Forest Resource Management and Its Climate-Change Mitigation Policies in Taiwan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Mining and Methodology
- Forest resources in Taiwan
- Inventory of GHG emissions from all sectors and carbon sequestration from the forestry sector
- Regulatory policies for mitigating GHG emissions from the forestry sector
3. Results
3.1. Trend Analysis of Forest Rresources in Taiwan
- -
- Broadleaf forests: 1470 thousand hectares (estimated) and 67% of forest area.
- -
- Coniferous forests: 299 thousand hectares (estimated) and 14% of forest area.
- -
- Mixed coniferous and broadleaf forests: 171 thousand hectares (estimated) and 8% of forest area.
- -
- Bamboo forests: 113 thousand hectares (estimated) and 5% of forest area.
- -
- Mixed bamboo forests: 115 thousand hectares (estimated) and 5% of forest area.
- -
- Pending forests: 29 thousand hectares (estimated) and 1% of forest area.
- -
- Broadleaf forests: 469.0 million metric tons (62.2%).
- -
- Coniferous forests: 156.3 million metric tons (20.7%).
- -
- Mixed coniferous and broadleaf forests: 103.5 million metric tons (13.7%).
- -
- Bamboo forests: 14.6 million metric tons (1.9%).
- -
- Mixed bamboo forests: 10.8 million metric tons (1.4%).
3.2. Trend Analysis of Carbon Sequestration in Taiwan’s Forestry Sector
- During the period 1990–2018, the change in the total carbon sequestration did not vary much (with the exception in 2009) ranging from 21.4 to 23.4 million metric tons. This stable situation was mainly due to the dynamic balance between increased sequestration from the annual growth of forest resources and decreased sequestration from falling and felling trees.
- Total carbon sequestration in 1990 was 23.4 million metric tons. By contrast, the value in 2018 dropped to 21.5 million metric tons, thus indicating an annually decline rate of 0.30%. Compared to the value (i.e., 21.9 million metric tons) in 2005 (base year), sequestration in 2018 was down by 1.88%.
- In recent years (2010–2018), biomass (i.e., wood) carbon sequestration indicated a slight increase from 20.4 million metric tons in 2010 to 20.7 million metric tons in 2018. This increase should be attributed to afforestation and forest management policies during this period. According to official statistics [22], forest land area increased from 2,101,719 hectares in 2010 to 2,197,090 hectares in 2018.
4. Discussion
4.1. Forestry Act
- (1)
- Carbon sequestration
- -
- To increase carbon reserves in forest and its soils, the central government agency requests that the central land administrative authority classifies the undeveloped mountains and lands as forestland (Article 6).
- -
- To maintain forest ecology and preserve biodiversity, a so-called “nature reserve” may be designated within a forest zone (Article 17-1).
- -
- To encourage reforestation and award forest business by private individuals and/or organizations, the central government agency may provide free seedings, rewards, long-term low-interest loans, or other assistances and promotions. In addition, the competent agency will establish a reforestation fund for the above-mentioned issue (Article 47, Article 48, and Article 48-1).
- (2)
- Carbon conservation
- -
- To conserve the carbon pool, a forest protection area may be designated in the forest periphery. Furthermore, prescribed burns and ignitions will not be permitted in the forest and forest protection zones (Article 33 and Article 34).
- -
- To prevent forest fire, the government agency will establish a forest fire squad and organize a volunteer forest fire squad as needed (Article 35).
- -
- To eliminate or prevent biological hazards or disturbances in the forest, the forest owner shall be responsible for them (Article 38).
- (3)
- Carbon substitution
- -
- To increase the transfer of carbon from forest biomass to other wood products such as building materials and/or biomass fuels, the harvesting of national forest yields shall be carried out according to the annual logging plan (Article 15).
- -
- To strengthen forest business, forestry practitioners may organize a forestry cooperative association based on the Cooperation Association Act (Article 19).
4.2. Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act
- (1)
- The relevant central government agencies will promote GHG reduction and climate-change adaptation through their actions, including
- -
- Development of renewable energy and energy technology; i.e., the use of wood-based biomass energy.
- -
- Reduction and management of GHG emissions from buildings; i.e., the use of woods.
- -
- Waste recycling and use; i.e., the reuse of waste wood as fuels or materials.
- -
- Forest resource management in the forest’s carbon sequestration.
- -
- Educational propaganda in climate-change adaptation and GHG reduction.
- (2)
- The central competent authority (i.e., EPA) will develop a “National Climate Change Action Guideline” and “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan” based on the nation’s economy, energy supplies, environments, international situation, and the assignment responsibilities by the relevant central government agencies [28,29].
- -
- The “National Climate Change Action Guideline” will be reviewed and examined once every five years.
- -
- The “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan” will contain regulatory items, including staged control goals, implementation timetables, implementation strategies, expected benefits, and an evaluation mechanism.
- -
- According to the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan”, the relevant central government agencies will include GHG emission targets, timetables, and economic incentive measures.
- (3)
- The central competent authority (i.e., EPA) will implement the cap-and-trade scheme based on the UNFCCC and its agreements, or relevant international conventions in response to international GHG reduction requirements.
- -
- After implementing GHG emission/sink accounting, verification, and registration as well as establishment of the regulations of allocation, offset, auction, sale, and allowance trading, the central competent authority in consultation with the central industrial competent authorities will implement the cap-and-trade scheme.
- -
- Major GHG emission sources may procure emissions allowances from the GHG emission reduction projects (e.g., offset project), which have been validated and registered in the holding account.
- -
- To reduce carbon footprint, the procurement of GHG reduction credits will give priority to domestic efforts.
5. Conclusions and Prospects
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Our World in Data—Emission by Sector. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Moomaw, W.R.; Law, B.E.; Goetz, S.J. Focus on the role of forests and soils in meeting climate change mitigation goals: Summary. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 045009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Nunes, L.J.R.; Meireles, C.I.R.; Pinto Gomes, C.J.; Almeida Ribeiro, N.M.C. Forest management and climate change mitigation: A review on carbon cycle flow models for the sustainability of resources. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nunes, L.J.R.; Meireles, C.I.R.; Pinto Gomes, C.J.; Almeida Ribeiro, N.M.C. Forest contribution to climate change mitigation: Management oriented to carbon capture and storage. Climate 2020, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, J.C.; Chiu, C.M.; Lin, Y.J.; Liu, W.Y. Thinning effects on biomass and carbon stock for young Taiwania plantations. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiou, C.R.; Lin, J.C.; Liu, W.Y. The carbon benefit of thinned wood for bioenergy in Taiwan. Forests 2019, 10, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, F.C.; Ko, C.H.; Tsai, M.J. Afforestation and tending operations affecting the carbon footprint and renewable resources at an artificial forest in Taiwan. BioResources 2020, 15, 641–653. [Google Scholar]
- Favero, A.; Daigneault, A.; Sohngen, B. Forests: Carbon sequestration, biomass energy, or both? Sci. Adv. 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Laws and Regulation Retrieving System. Available online: https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/index.aspx (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Environmental Protection Administration (EPA). Taiwan Greenhouse Gases Inventory: 1990–2018; EPA: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, W.T.; Chou, Y.H. Overview of Environmental Impacts, Prospects and Policies for Renewable Energy in Taiwan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2005, 9, 119–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.J.; Chang, W.R. Policy progress in mitigation of climate change in Taiwan. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.; Lin, C.H. Comparison of carbon sequestration potential in agricultural and afforestation farming systems. Sci. Agric. 2013, 70, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsai, W.T. Feed-in tariff promotion and innovative measures for renewable electricity: Taiwan case analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.C.; Lin, J.C.; Fan, C.T.; Lien, C.A.; Chung, S.M. A booming green business for Taiwan’s climate perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kung, C.C.; Zhang, L.; Chang, M.C. Promotion policies for renewable energy and their effects in Taiwan. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 965–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, K.T.; Walther, D.; Liou, H.M. The conundrums of sustainability: Carbon emissions and electricity consumption in the electronics and petrochemical industries in Taiwan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsai, W.T. Commentary on the Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Absorption by the forestry sector in Taiwan. Forest Res. 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forestry Bureau (FB). The 4th National Forest Resource Investigation; FB: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Qin, L.W.; Huang, Q.X.; Wu, C.C.; Hsien, H.T. The 4th National Forest Resource Investigation: Executive summary. Taiwan For. J. 2015, 41, 3–13. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Council of Agriculture (COA). Agriculture Statistics Yearbook 2019; COA: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Forestry Bureau (FB). Forest Resource Management. Available online: https://www.forest.gov.tw/EN/0002664 (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Wu, C.C. Typhoon Morakot—Key findings from the Journal TAO for improving prediction of extreme rains at landfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2013, 94, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- About the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed on 5 November 2020).
- Council for Sustainable Development. Annual Review Report on the Taiwan’s Sustainable Development Goals; Environmental Protection Administration: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). First FSC Forest Management Certificate Awarded in Taiwan. 2 February 2015. Available online: https://fsc.org/en/newsfeed/first-fsc-forest-management-certificate-awarded-in-taiwan (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- National Climate Change Action Guidelines. Available online: https://adapt.epa.gov.tw/TCCIP-1-D/TCCIP-1-D-6 (accessed on 10 November 2020). (In Chinese)
- Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan. Available online: https://ghgrule.epa.gov.tw/action/action_page/51 (accessed on 10 November 2020). (In Chinese)
Forest Type | Wood Density | Biomass Expansion Factor | Biomass Conversion and Expansion Factor | Ratio 2 | Carbon Fraction | Annual Growth (m3/Hectare) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural coniferous | 0.41 | 1.27 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.4821 | 4.14 |
Natural coniferous–broadleaf | 0.49 | 1.34 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 0.4756 | 10.05 |
Natural broadleaf | 0.56 | 1.40 | 0.92 | 0.24 | 0.4691 | 3.58 |
Artificial coniferous | 0.41 | 1.27 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.4821 | 8.11 |
Artificial coniferous–broadleaf | 0.49 | 1.34 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 0.4756 | 10.37 |
Artificial broadleaf | 0.56 | 1.40 | 0.92 | 0.24 | 0.4691 | 4.34 |
Mixed bamboo | 0.49 | 1.34 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 0.4756 | 3.31 |
Bamboo | 0.62 | 1.40 | - | 0.46 | 0.4732 | 13.84 3 |
Forest Type | Stock Volume (103 m3) |
---|---|
Natural forest | 429,525 |
Coniferous forest | 103,070 |
White fir | 11,562 |
Hemlock | 44,834 |
Spruce | 6191 |
Cypress | 22,189 |
Pine | 17,176 |
Others | 1118 |
Broadleaf forest | 268,874 |
Mixed coniferous–broadleaf forest | 57,581 |
Artificial forest | 64,491 |
Coniferous forest | 29,474 |
Cypress | 5740 |
Pine | 7940 |
Chinese fir | 1658 |
Willow | 11,882 |
Others | 2254 |
Broadleaf forest | 19,790 |
Mixed coniferous–broadleaf forest | 15,226 |
Mixed bamboo forest | 8018 |
Total | 502,034 |
Sequestration/Emission | Year | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | ||
Forests maintaining forests | Biomass carbon sequestration | 23,902 | 23,146 | 22,201 | 21,255 | 20,392 | 20,546 | 20,575 | 20,612 | 20,656 |
Biomass carbon emission | 607 | 202 | 389 | 369 | 218 | 189 | 153 | 111 | 83 | |
Other lands turned to forests | Biomass carbon sequestration | 91 | 288 | 665 | 1032 | 1240 | 1068 | 1029 | 981 | 934 |
Total carbon sequestration 2 | 23,386 | 23,233 | 22,476 | 22,918 | 22,413 | 21,425 | 21,451 | 21,482 | 21,507 |
Emission/Sink | Year | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
Total emission | 124,066 | 168,873 | 226,978 | 266,460 | 270,148 | 275,835 | 279,705 | 284,812 | 282,842 |
Sink by forestry sector | 23,386 | 23,233 | 22,476 | 22,918 | 22,413 | 21,425 | 21,451 | 21,482 | 21,507 |
Net emission | 100,680 | 145,640 | 204,502 | 244,542 | 248,735 | 254,410 | 258,254 | 263,330 | 261,335 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tsai, W.-T. Forest Resource Management and Its Climate-Change Mitigation Policies in Taiwan. Climate 2021, 9, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9010003
Tsai W-T. Forest Resource Management and Its Climate-Change Mitigation Policies in Taiwan. Climate. 2021; 9(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9010003
Chicago/Turabian StyleTsai, Wen-Tien. 2021. "Forest Resource Management and Its Climate-Change Mitigation Policies in Taiwan" Climate 9, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9010003
APA StyleTsai, W. -T. (2021). Forest Resource Management and Its Climate-Change Mitigation Policies in Taiwan. Climate, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9010003