Identifying Soybean Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Selection and Acquisition
2.2. Laboratory Seedling Vigor Testing Under PEG-Induced Dehydration
2.3. Greenhouse Trial Under Salinity Stress
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Identifying Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses
3. Results
3.1. PEG-Based Seedling Vigor Test
3.2. Salinity Test
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- McCouch, S.; Baute, G.J.; Bradeen, J.; Bramel, P.; Bretting, P.K.; Buckler, E.; Burke, J.M.; Charest, D.; Cloutier, S.; Cole, G.; et al. Agriculture: Feeding the future. Nature 2013, 499, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, B.; Sun, L.; Jiang, S.; Ren, H.; Sun, R.; Wei, Z.; Hong, H.; Luan, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Soybean genetic resources contributing to sustainable protein production. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 4095–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez, M.J.; De la Rosa, L.; Martín, I.; Guasch, L.; Cartea, M.E.; Mallor, C.; Casals, J.; Simó, J.; Rivera, A.; Anastasio, G.; et al. Plant genebanks: Present situation and proposals for their improvement. The case of the Spanish network. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. The Third Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoury, C.; Laliberte, B.; Guarino, L. Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: A review of global crop and regional conservation strategies. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2010, 57, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engels, J.M.; Ebert, A.W. A critical review of the current global ex situ conservation system for plant agrobiodiversity. II. Strengths and weaknesses of the current system and recommendations for its improvement. Plants 2021, 10, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, C. Reimaging the role of national genebanks: Purposes, priorities, and programs. Plant Genet. Resour. 2026, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.B. The vulnerability of plant genetic resources conserved ex situ. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 2314–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCouch, S.; Navabi, Z.K.; Abberton, M.; Anglin, N.L.; Barbieri, R.L.; Baum, M.; Bett, K.; Booker, H.; Brown, G.L.; Bryan, G.J.; et al. Mobilizing crop biodiversity. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1341–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghamkhar, K.; Hay, F.R.; Engbers, M.; Dempewolf, H.; Schurr, U. Realizing the potential of plant genetic resources: The use of phenomics for genebanks. Plants People Planet 2025, 7, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beversdorf, W.D.; Buzzell, R.I.; Ablett, G.R.; Voldeng, H.D. Soybean. In Harvest of Gold: The History of Field Crop Breeding in Canada; Slinkard, A.E., Knott, D.R., Eds.; University Extension Press, University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 1995; pp. 153–166. [Google Scholar]
- Voldeng, H.D.; Cober, E.R.; Hume, D.J.; Gillard, C.; Morrison, M.J. Fifty-eight years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soy Canada. Statistics at a Glance. Available online: http://soycanada.ca/statistics/at-a-glance/ (accessed on 23 March 2026).
- Richardson, K.J. Identifying Barriers and Drivers of Early Soybean Adoption in Saskatchewan. Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- MacMillan, K.P.; Gulden, R.H. Effect of seeding date, environment and cultivar on soybean seed yield, yield components, and seed quality in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 1666–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ort, N.; Morrison, M.; Cober, E.; McAndrew, D.; Lawley, Y. A comparison of soybean maturity groups for phenology, seed yield, and seed quality components between eastern Ontario and southern Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 102, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cober, E.R.; Voldeng, H.D. Developing high-Protein, high-yield soybean populations and lines. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cober, E.R.; Voldeng, H.D. A retrospective look at short-season soybean cultivar development in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 92, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, M.; Wu, L. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1994, 13, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiebe, B.H.; Eilers, R.G.; Eilers, W.D.; Brierley, J.A. Application of a risk indicator for assessing trends in dryland salinization risk on the Canadian Prairies. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2007, 87, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.J.; Negrão, S.; Tester, M. Salt resistant crop plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valencia, R.; Chen, P.; Ishibashi, T.; Conatser, M. A rapid and effective method for screening salt tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci. 2008, 48, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Shannon, G.; Vieira, C.C.; Nascimento, E.F.; Ali, M.L.; Lee, D.; Scaboo, A.; Crisel, M.; Smothers, S.; Clubb, M.; et al. Registration of ‘S16-14801C’: A high-yielding determinate maturity group V soybean cultivar with multiple disease resistance, salt tolerance, and broad adaptation. J. Plant Regist. 2022, 16, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakati, J.P.; Fallen, B.; Bridges, W.; Narayanan, S. Characterization of a soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) population for germination and seedling root traits under water stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Ge, L.; Fei, L.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Fan, W.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, L. A comprehensive evaluation of soybean germplasm resources for salt tolerance during germination. Plants 2025, 14, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, S.; Fallen, B. Evaluation of soybean plant introductions for traits that can improve emergence under varied soil moisture levels. Agronomy 2019, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalzotto, M.B. Selection of Drought-Tolerant Soybean Lines Using a Field Screening Method and Identification of QTLs for Slow Wilting and Nitrogen Fixation Associated with Drought-Tolerance. Master’s Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA, 2016. Available online: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1761 (accessed on 23 March 2026).
- Gobade, A.; Arathi, S.; Gijare, S.; Pamar, D.; Abhinandan, S.P. Evaluating salt tolerance in soybean core collection: Germination response under salinity stress. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2025, 72, 2059–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.-J.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, X.-M.; Wang, S.-J.; Chen, X.-Q.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, Q.-Y. Identification, evaluation and screening of salt-tolerant of soybean germplasm resources at seedling stage. Acta Agron. Sin. 2024, 50, 2179–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sloane, R.J.; Patterson, R.P.; Carter, T.E., Jr. Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci. 1990, 30, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, E.J.; Ali, M.L.; Beavis, W.D.; Chen, P.; Clemente, T.E.; Diers, B.W.; Graef, G.L.; Grassini, P.; Hyten, D.L.; McHale, L.K.; et al. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding: History, improvement, production and future opportunities. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Legumes; Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 431–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjarrez-Sandoval, P.; Chen, P.; Mozzoni, L.; Florez-Palacios, L.; Orazaly, M.; Wu, C.; Sinclair, T.R.; Carter, T.E., Jr.; Purcell, L.C.; King, A.C. Registration of soybean germplasm lines R10-2436 and R10-2710 with drought tolerance traits and high yield under moderate water stress. J. Plant Regist. 2020, 14, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.B.; Cober, E.R.; Morrison, M.J.; Marsolais, F.; Peterson, G.W.; Horbach, C. Patterns of genetic variation in a soybean germplasm collection as characterized with genotyping-by-sequencing. Plants 2021, 10, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, Y.B.; Cober, E.R.; Morrison, M.J.; Marsolais, F.; Zhou, R.; Xu, N.; Gahagan, A.C.; Horbach, C. Variability in maturity, oil and protein concentration, and genetic distinctness among soybean accessions conserved at Plant Gene Resources of Canada. Plants 2022, 11, 3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathan, S.M.; Lee, J.-D.; Sleper, D.A.; Fritschi, F.B.; Sharp, R.E.; Carter, T.E., Jr.; Nelson, R.L.; King, C.A.; Schapaugh, W.T.; Ellersieck, M.R.; et al. Two soybean plant introductions display slow leaf wilting and reduced yield loss under drought. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2014, 200, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, K.G.; Steppuhn, H.; Gatzke, M.C. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s Salinity Tolerance Testing Laboratory. Poster Presentation Soils and Crops Workshop 2015, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10388/8852 (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Hoagland, D.R.; Arnon, D.I. The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil; California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347. College of Agriculture, University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1950. Available online: https://www.nutricaodeplantas.agr.br/site/downloads/hoagland_arnon.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Maas, E.V. Crop salt tolerance. In Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management; Tanji, K.K., Ed.; American Society of Civil Engineers Manual 71; ASCE: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 262–304. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, J.W.; Hayward, H.E.; Richards, A.; Bernstein, L.; Hatcher, J.T.; Reeve, R.C.; Richards, L.A.; Allison, L.E.; Bower, C.A.; Fireman, M.; et al. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; Agriculture Handbook No. 60; Richards, L.A., Ed.; U. S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1954.
- Fehr, W.R.; Caviness, C.E. Stages of Soybean Development; Iowa State University of Science and Technology: Ames, IA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Kendall, M.G.; Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics; Charles Griffin and Company: London, UK, 1958; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
- Emmerich, W.E.; Hardegree, S.P. Polyethylene glycol solution contact effects on seed germination. Agron. J. 1990, 82, 1103–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Macdonald, S.E.; Zwiazak, J.J. Effects of cold storage and water stress on water relations and gas exchange of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1995, 15, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacomini, E.; Bertani, A.; Mapelli, S. Accumulation of polyethylene glycol 6000 and its effects on water content and carbohydrate level in water-stressed tomato plants. Can. J. Bot. 1988, 66, 970–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Shi, A.; Zhang, J.; Qie, L.; Miao, F.; Yin, Q. Field-based screening and evaluation of salt-tolerant tomato germplasm. HortScience 2025, 61, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ludlow, M.M.; Muchow, R.C. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv. Agron. 1990, 43, 107–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passioura, J.B. Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: When is it useful to breeders? Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, C.; Gao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Jing, Y.; Li, S.; Yan, Z.; Xu, K.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; et al. Unfolding molecular switches for salt stress resilience in soybean: Recent advances and prospects for salt-tolerant smart plant production. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1162014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Waqar, A.; Hu, Z.; Yang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Qi, Z.; Chen, Q.; Hu, L. Advances in salinity tolerance of soybean: Molecular mechanism and breeding strategy. Food Energy Secur. 2025, 14, e70073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gowda, V.R.; Henry, A.; Yamauchi, A.; Shashidhar, H.E.; Serraj, R. Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res. 2011, 122, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fried, H.G.; Narayanan, S.; Fallen, B. Characterization of a soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) germplasm collection for root traits. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arya, H.; Singh, M.B.; Bhalla, P.L. Towards developing drought-smart soybeans. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 750664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loxley, M. A Snapshot of the Changing Prairie Climate; ClimateWest: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2022; Available online: https://climatewest.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Snapshot-Changing_Prairie-Climate-2022.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2026).
- Anderson, R.; Bayer, P.E.; Edwards, D. Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 56, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Treatment | Baseline Nutrition | CaCl2(g L−1) | MgSO4(g L−1) | Na2SO4 (g L−1) | NaCl (g L−1) | ECi (dS m−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Included | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Moderate | Included | 1.019 | 0.503 | 2.639 | 1.192 | 8.1 |
| Severe | Included | 1.869 | 0.988 | 8.364 | 1.910 | 16.1 |
| Sources of Variation | Degree of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Square | F Value | Pr (>F) | Variance (%) for Transformed Data | Variance (%) for Original Data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG-based testing | |||||||
| Accession | 738 | 4377 | 5.90 | 9.56 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.457 | 0.367 |
| Treatment | 2 | 3341 | 1670.40 | 2691.56 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.349 | 0.303 |
| Rep | 1 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.3712 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Accession:Treatment | 579 | 1147 | 2.00 | 3.19 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.120 | 0.190 |
| Accession:Rep | 696 | 499 | 0.70 | 1.16 | 0.0639 | 0.052 | 0.092 |
| Treatment:Rep | 2 | 1 | 0.70 | 1.19 | 0.3047 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Residuals | 347 | 215 | 0.60 | 0.022 | 0.048 | ||
| Salinity testing | |||||||
| Accession | 71 | 180.6 | 2.54 | 13.41 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.180 | 0.303 |
| Salt | 2 | 524 | 262.01 | 1381.12 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.521 | 0.206 |
| Rep | 5 | 23.4 | 4.67 | 24.64 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.023 | 0.027 |
| Accession:Salt | 127 | 64.3 | 0.51 | 2.67 | 4 × 10−14 | 0.064 | 0.098 |
| Accession:Rep | 347 | 83.5 | 0.24 | 1.27 | 0.0092 | 0.083 | 0.174 |
| Salt:Rep | 10 | 45.1 | 4.51 | 23.77 | <2 × 10−16 | 0.045 | 0.022 |
| Residuals | 443 | 84 | 0.19 | 0.084 | 0.168 |
| Accession | Origin | Description | MG | Mean | SD | Ns | RT | RTsd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 accessions | ||||||||
| CN29798 | CHN | Wu Ding Choo | NA | 465.1 | NA | 1 | 0.471 | NA |
| CN107453 | CAN | Electron | NA | 46,267.2 | 22,717.2 | 2 | 0.274 | 0.098 |
| CN29789 | CHN | Hei Nung No. 18 | NA | 482.3 | NA | 1 | 0.266 | NA |
| TMP29567 | CHN | PI 567690, Fu yang (7) | NA | 51,566.6 | 42,386.4 | 2 | 0.164 | 0.126 |
| CN107411 | CAN | Micron | NA | 295.7 | NA | 1 | 0.153 | NA |
| CN107451 | CAN | OT96-25 | NA | 4800.0 | NA | 1 | 0.151 | NA |
| CN29792 | CHN | Feng Shou No. 12 | NA | 477.7 | NA | 1 | 0.126 | NA |
| CN114471 | CAN | Kamichis | NA | 6013.3 | 6576.7 | 2 | 0.103 | 0.016 |
| CN35343 | KOR | KAS362-5 | NA | 882.9 | NA | 1 | 0.098 | NA |
| CN33266 | CAN | Harcor | NA | 1192.0 | NA | 1 | 0.091 | NA |
| TMP29568 | CHN | PI 567731, Fu yang (56) | NA | 24,135.8 | 8615.6 | 2 | 0.091 | 0.027 |
| CN52740 | CAN | OT94-41 | NA | 726.1 | NA | 1 | 0.085 | NA |
| CN35371 | KOR | KAS643-1 | NA | 470.6 | NA | 1 | 0.073 | NA |
| CN107412 | CAN | AC Colibri | NA | 220.6 | NA | 1 | 0.073 | NA |
| CN107502 | FRA | B 10 | 3 | 30,435.0 | 9251.0 | 2 | 0.071 | 0.011 |
| CN115284 | RUS | Saliut | NA | 25,910.5 | NA | 1 | 0.070 | NA |
| TMP29570 | USA | PI 647960, R01-416F | NA | 25,052.7 | 10,705.9 | 2 | 0.063 | 0.016 |
| CN29793 | CHN | Jao Teh Jar Ching | NA | 795.1 | NA | 1 | 0.060 | NA |
| CN30389 | RUS | Amurskaja 042 | NA | 1575.0 | NA | 1 | 0.058 | NA |
| CN107577 | CHN | Shika No. 4 | 2 | 6811.9 | NA | 1 | 0.054 | NA |
| CN107511 | FRA | Jaune De Desme | 2 | 15,494.1 | NA | 1 | 0.051 | NA |
| TMP29565 | USA | PI 471938, 197 | NA | 15,993.5 | 18,561.7 | 2 | 0.046 | 0.066 |
| CN35757 | UKR | Terezikskaja 24 | NA | 1702.9 | NA | 1 | 0.045 | NA |
| CN44436 | KOR | Kaeri-Gnt 641-3 | NA | 12,921.8 | 1141.9 | 2 | 0.040 | 0.037 |
| CN107879 | UNK | V-16 | 2 | 1085.1 | NA | 1 | 0.039 | NA |
| CN45088 | YUG | 1015 | NA | 12,190.4 | 5892.6 | 2 | 0.038 | 0.041 |
| CN35364 | KOR | KAS629-1 | NA | 625.4 | NA | 1 | 0.037 | NA |
| CN107580 | HUN | Iregy soja | 2 | 4811.4 | NA | 1 | 0.036 | NA |
| CN107651 | RUS | Salut 216 UDSSR | NA | 9858.3 | NA | 1 | 0.035 | NA |
| TMP29569 | USA | PI 592756, Dillon | NA | 14,828.7 | 3390.3 | 2 | 0.033 | 0.010 |
| CN30633 | HUN | Iregi Korona | NA | 1319.6 | 837.0 | 2 | 0.031 | 0.006 |
| CN39086 | CAN | X702-3-2 | NA | 1382.6 | 702.6 | 2 | 0.031 | 0.016 |
| 16 control accessions | ||||||||
| Mean | 0.037 | 0.043 | ||||||
| Accession | Origin | Description | MG | Moderate Salinity | Accession | Origin | Description | MG | Severe Salinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | RT | RTsd | Mean | RT | RTsd | ||||||||
| 20 accessions | |||||||||||||
| CN29789 | CHN | Hei Nung No. 18 | NA | 2.93 | 0.886 | 0.709 | CN29789 | CHN | Hei Nung No. 18 | NA | 0.87 | 0.262 | 0.136 |
| CN39086 | CAN | X702-3-2 | NA | 3.44 | 0.866 | 1.172 | CN107808 | FRA | Grignon 1 | 3 | 0.96 | 0.229 | NA |
| CN107879 | UNK | V-16 | 2 | 6.56 | 0.854 | 0.793 | CN107490 | DEU | Strain No. 14 | 2 | 0.47 | 0.193 | 0.053 |
| CN32351 | ROU | No. 850 | NA | 8.46 | 0.762 | 0.521 | CN107587 | CHN | PI 358321b | 2 | 0.67 | 0.188 | 0.084 |
| CN33247 | CAN | Hardome | NA | 3.18 | 0.676 | 0.340 | CN107873 | POL | Mlochowska | 1 | 0.48 | 0.163 | NA |
| CN30318 | CHN | See Table S1 | NA | 3.07 | 0.605 | 0.239 | CN35757 | UKR | Terezikskaja 24 | NA | 0.57 | 0.152 | 0.064 |
| CN107474 | DEU | B-34 | 2 | 0.94 | 0.589 | 0.422 | OACAyton | CAN | Cultivar | NA | 1.47 | 0.146 | 0.270 |
| CN30633 | HUN | Iregi Korona | NA | 5.57 | 0.585 | 0.464 | CN107474 | DEU | B-34 | 2 | 0.22 | 0.137 | 0.154 |
| CN107590 | RUS | Amurskaja 310 | 3 | 1.30 | 0.576 | 0.580 | CN115283 | DEU | See Table S1 | NA | 0.40 | 0.126 | 0.143 |
| CN39087 | CAN | X702-3-3 | NA | 1.21 | 0.575 | 0.413 | CN107623 | RUS | Staroukrainskaja | 2 | 0.38 | 0.109 | 0.238 |
| CN35344 | KOR | KAS362-7 | NA | 2.92 | 0.575 | 0.529 | CN107582 | ROU | S-16 | 2 | 0.28 | 0.106 | 0.091 |
| CN107375 | CAN | Blackjack 21 | NA | 8.64 | 0.548 | 0.503 | CN30318 | CHN | See Table S1 | NA | 0.52 | 0.102 | NA |
| CN107582 | ROU | S-16 | 2 | 1.42 | 0.539 | 0.238 | CN107862 | DEU | No. 119-49 | 2 | 0.68 | 0.100 | 0.123 |
| CN107490 | DEU | Strain No. 14 | 2 | 1.27 | 0.516 | 0.262 | CN107819 | JPN | See Table S1 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.098 | 0.121 |
| CN107511 | FRA | Jaune De Desme | 2 | 1.18 | 0.515 | 0.394 | CN107451 | CAN | OT96-25 | NA | 0.19 | 0.088 | NA |
| CN35339 | KOR | KAS351-4 | NA | 4.43 | 0.511 | 0.412 | CN29795 | CHN | See Table S1 | NA | 0.29 | 0.085 | NA |
| CN107873 | POL | Mlochowska | 1 | 1.45 | 0.494 | 0.323 | CN45088 | YUG | 1015 | NA | 0.47 | 0.083 | 0.070 |
| CN107634 | JPN | B44 | 2 | 2.38 | 0.489 | 0.469 | CN107849 | SWE | 699-2-4 | 2 | 0.28 | 0.082 | 0.088 |
| CN52736 | CAN | OT94-49 | NA | 1.96 | 0.480 | 0.370 | CN39087 | CAN | X702-3-3 | NA | 0.17 | 0.081 | 0.104 |
| CN107557 | HUN | See Table S1 | 3 | 1.31 | 0.462 | 0.302 | CN107469 | CAN | Manitoba Brown | 2 | 0.16 | 0.079 | 0.186 |
| 4 control accessions | |||||||||||||
| Mean | 0.343 | 0.009 | 0.094 | 0.074 | |||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Fu, Y.-B.; Quilichini, S.M.; Cober, E.R.; Hou, A.; Warkentin, T.D.; Horbach, C.; Judiesch, T. Identifying Soybean Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses. Plants 2026, 15, 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15091355
Fu Y-B, Quilichini SM, Cober ER, Hou A, Warkentin TD, Horbach C, Judiesch T. Identifying Soybean Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses. Plants. 2026; 15(9):1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15091355
Chicago/Turabian StyleFu, Yong-Bi, Shanna M. Quilichini, Elroy R. Cober, Anfu Hou, Thomas D. Warkentin, Carolee Horbach, and Thomas Judiesch. 2026. "Identifying Soybean Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses" Plants 15, no. 9: 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15091355
APA StyleFu, Y.-B., Quilichini, S. M., Cober, E. R., Hou, A., Warkentin, T. D., Horbach, C., & Judiesch, T. (2026). Identifying Soybean Germplasm with Tolerance to Dehydration and Salinity Stresses. Plants, 15(9), 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15091355

