A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for Ziziphus jujuba
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Orthogonal Screening Identifies 6-BA and 2,4-D as the Primary Drivers of Callus Induction
2.2. Callus Morphological Grading Correlates with Biomass
2.3. Proliferation Optimization for the Dominance of 6-BA and Genotype-Specific Response to 2,4-D
2.4. Determination of Genotype-Specific Antibiotic Selection Thresholds
2.5. Orthogonal Screening of Acetosyringone and Vector Backbone
2.6. EGFP Fluorescence Analysis for Transformation Efficiency
2.7. Validation of ZjCBF3 Integration and Expression
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials
4.2. Callus Induction: Medium and L18 (37) Design
4.3. Callus Proliferation
4.4. Determination of Antibiotic Selection Thresholds for Transformation
4.5. Binary Vector Construction
4.6. Optimization of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Parameters
4.7. EGFP Fluorescence Observation and Transformation Efficiency Assessment
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, M.J.; Zhao, J.; Cai, Q.L.; Liu, G.C.; Wang, J.R.; Zhao, Z.H.; Liu, P.; Dai, L.; Yan, G.; Wang, W.J.; et al. The complex jujube genome provides insights into fruit tree biology. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Fei, Z.; Wan, K.K.; Zhang, Z.; Pang, X.; Yin, X.; Bai, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. The Jujube Genome Provides Insights into Genome Evolution and the Domestication of Sweetness/Acidity Taste in Fruit Trees. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, L.D.; Malnoy, M.; Gribaudo, I. Breeding next generation tree fruits: Technical and legal challenges. Hortic. Res. 2017, 4, 17067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, C.; Lu, L.; Guo, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, R. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the commercial hybrid poplar Populus alba × Populus glandulosa Uyeki. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Wu, T.; Han, Z.; Zhang, X. Genetic diversity and heritability of in vitro leaf regeneration ability in Malus species. HortScience 2017, 52, 1396–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabbadini, S.; Capriotti, L.; Molesini, B.; Pandolfini, T.; Navacchi, O.; Limera, C.; Ricci, A.; Mezzetti, B. Comparison of regeneration capacity and Agrobacterium-mediated cell transformation efficiency of different cultivars and rootstocks of Vitis spp. via organogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schröpfer, S.; Lempe, J.; Emeriewen, O.F.; Flachowsky, H. Recent Developments and Strategies for the Application of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Apple Malus × domestica Borkh. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 928292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Li, R.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Hyden, B.; Han, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Cao, H. Establishment of a genetic transformation system of peach callus. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 323, 112501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, X.F.; Meng, H.; Qi, G.; Zhang, J.R. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the winter jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.). In Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 94, pp. 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Maqbool, A.; Zang, J.; Niu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, M. Establishment of a Simple Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation System in Sour Jujube. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 341, 113984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.J.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhang, C.L.; Xie, X.B.; Zhao, C.; Hao, Y.J. The small ubiquitin-like modifier E3 ligase MdSIZ1 promotes anthocyanin accumulation by sumoylating MdMYB1 under low-temperature conditions in apple. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2068–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Zhou, L.J.; Gao, H.N.; Wang, X.F.; Li, Z.W.; Li, Y.Y. The transcription factor MdMYB2 influences cold tolerance and anthocyanin accumulation by activating SUMO E3 ligase MdSIZ1 in apple. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 2044–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, W.; Mei, Z.; Yu, L.; Gu, T.; Li, Z.; Zou, Q.; Zhang, S.; Fang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. The ABA-induced NAC transcription factor MdNAC1 interacts with a bZIP-type transcription factor to promote anthocyanin synthesis in red-fleshed apples. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, P.; Liao, G.; Lu, D.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Q.; Wu, C.; Wang, J. ZjHXK5 and ZjHXK6 negatively regulate the sugar metabolism of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1335120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Dai, L.; Qi, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, L.; et al. A Novel ZjbZIP33-ZjPRX1 Module Positively Regulates Lignin Formation in the Jujube Fruit Stone. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2025, 23, 4998–5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Ouyang, K.; Chen, X.; Bai, L. High frequency regeneration of plants via callus-mediated organogenesis from cotyledon and hypocotyl cultures in a multipurpose tropical tree (Neolamarckia cadamba). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Wang, D.; Long, X.; Hao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, Y.; Cheng, T.; Shi, J.; Chen, J. Agrobacterium-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Embryogenic Callus in a Liriodendron Hybrid (L. Chinense × L. Tulipifera). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 802128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, J.A.T.; Gulyás, A.; Magyar-Tábori, K.; Wang, M.R.; Wang, Q.C.; Dobránszki, J. In vitro tissue culture of apple and other Malus species: Recent advances and applications. Planta 2019, 249, 975–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, M.; Cao, F.; Tao, G.; Zhou, X. Combating browning: Mechanisms and management strategies in in vitro culture of economic woody plants. For. Res. 2024, 4, e032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verardo, G.; Gorassini, A.; Ricci, D.; Fraternale, D. High Triterpenic Acids Production in Callus Cultures from Fruit Pulp of Two Apple Varieties. Phytochem. Anal. 2017, 28, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gubitosa, F.; Fraternale, D.; De Bellis, R.; Gorassini, A.; Benayada, L.; Chiarantini, L.; Albertini, M.C.; Potenza, L. Cydonia oblonga Mill. Pulp Callus Inhibits Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Injured Cells. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gubitosa, F.; Benayada, L.; Fraternale, D.; De Bellis, R.; Carloni, S.; Potenza, L.; Chiarantini, L.; Gorassini, A.; Verardo, G.; Roselli, C.; et al. Long-lasting bioactive compounds production from Malusxdomestica Borkh var. Mela Rosa Marchigiana pulp callus culture with antioxidant activity: In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo validation. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 114, 106073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitiello, M.; Braca, A.; De Leo, M.; Fraternale, D. Profiling specialized metabolites of two Malus domestica Borkh. varieties: In vitro pulp callus culture vs fruit peel and pulp. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 338, 113821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laezza, C.; Maisto, M.; Imbimbo, P.; Monti, D.M.; Verrillo, M.; Di Loria, A.; Monti, S.M.; Marzocchi, A.; Grieco, P.; Tenore, G.C.; et al. Elicitor-mediated simultaneous accumulation of phloridzin and ursolic acid in Annurca apple peel-derived calli. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2025, 105, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bennur, P.L.; O’Brien, M.; Fernando, S.C.; Doblin, M.S. Improving transformation and regeneration efficiency in medicinal plants: Insights from other recalcitrant species. J. Exp. Bot. 2025, 76, 52–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagle, M.; Déjardin, A.; Pilate, G.; Strauss, S.H. Opportunities for innovation in genetic transformation of forest trees. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, D.K.; Dey, N.; Maiti, I.B. pSiM24 is a novel versatile gene expression vector for transient assays as well as stable expression of foreign genes in plants. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, A.; Bass, S.H.; Wu, E.; Wang, N.; McBride, K.E.; Annaluru, N.; Miller, M.; Hua, M.; Jones, T.J. An improved ternary vector system for Agrobacterium-mediated rapid maize transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 97, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szarzanowicz, M.J.; Waldburger, L.M.; Busche, M.; Geiselman, G.M.; Kirkpatrick, L.D.; Kehl, A.J.; Tahmin, C.; Kuo, R.C.; McCauley, J.; Pannu, H.; et al. Binary vector copy number engineering improves Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 43, 1708–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ming, N.J.; Mostafiz, S.B.; Johon, N.S.; Zulkifli, N.S.A.; Wagiran, A. Combination of plant growth regulators, maltose, and partial desiccation treatment enhance somatic embryogenesis in selected malaysian rice cultivar. Plants 2019, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pan, G.; Shen, Y. New Insights Into Tissue Culture Plant-Regeneration Mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 926752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lardon, R.; Geelen, D. Natural variation in plant pluripotency and regeneration. Plants 2020, 9, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, H.; Sun, X.; Yue, P.; Qiao, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, A.; Yuan, H.; Yu, W. The MdAux/IAA2 Transcription Repressor Regulates Cell and Fruit Size in Apple Fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasternak, T.P.; Steinmacher, D. Plant Growth Regulation in Cell and Tissue Culture In Vitro. Plants 2024, 13, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabbadini, S.; Ricci, A.; Limera, C.; Baldoni, D.; Capriotti, L.; Mezzetti, B. Factors affecting the regeneration, via organogenesis, and the selection of transgenic calli in the peach Rootstock Hansen 536 (Prunus persica × Prunus amygdalus) to express an RNAi construct against PPV virus. Plants 2019, 8, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirzaee, M.H.; Emadpour, M. Advances in the Transformation of Cyclamen persicum Mill. Through Direct Regeneration Based on an Optimized Kanamycin Selection Scheme. Mol. Biotechnol. 2024, 66, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.H.; Liu, F.; Liu, Z.H.; Wang, H.M.; Yao, C.B. Effects of kanamycin on tissue culture and somatic embryogenesis in cotton. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 33, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambhir, G.; Kumar, P.; Srivastava, D.K. Effect of antibiotic sensitivity on different cultured tissues and its significance in genetic transformation of cabbage Brassica oleracea. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2017, 10, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojo, F.P.; Seth, S.; Erskine, W.; Kaur, P. An improved protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervera, M.; Navarro, A.; Navarro, L.; Peña, L. Production of transgenic adult plants from clementine mandarin by enhancing cell competence for transformation and regeneration. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Brunner, A.M.; Meilan, R.; Strauss, S.H. Stability of transgenes in trees: Expression of two reporter genes in poplar over three field seasons. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philips, J.G.; Dudley, K.J.; Waterhouse, P.M.; Hellens, R.P. The rapid methylation of T-DNAs upon Agrobacterium inoculation in plant leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, G.Q.; Prieto, H.; Orbovic, V. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tree fruit crops: Methods, progress, and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dalla Costa, L.; Piazza, S.; Pompili, V.; Salvagnin, U.; Cestaro, A.; Moffa, L.; Vittani, L.; Moser, C.; Malnoy, M. Strategies to produce T-DNA free CRISPRed fruit trees via Agrobacterium tumefaciens stable gene transfer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y.; Wang, C.; Xiao, D.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y. Advances and Perspectives of Transgenic Technology and Biotechnological Application in Forest Trees. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 786328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dominguez, M.M.; Padilla, C.S.; Mandadi, K.K. A versatile Agrobacterium-based plant transformation system for genetic engineering of diverse citrus cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 878335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Ren, Y.; Du, K.; Wang, J.; Yang, M. Effect of T-DNA Integration on Growth of Transgenic Populus × euramericana cv. Neva Underlying Field Stands. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piao, C.L.; Ding, M.; Gao, Y.; Song, T.; Zhu, Y.; Cui, M.L. An Improved Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Method for an Important Fresh Fruit: Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Plants 2025, 14, 2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abudoukayoumu, A.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Cao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J. Nitrate enhances salt tolerance of wild jujube by regulating nutrient homeostasis and nitrate transporters. Plant Stress 2025, 17, 100927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, T.; Yang, H.; Zhou, D.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Huang, M.; Kong, D.; Liu, Y. Establishment of a Genetic Transformation and Gene Editing Method by Floral Dipping in Descurainia Sophia. Plants 2016, 13, 2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Test No. | Carbon Source | TDZ (mg L−1) | 6-BA (mg L−1) | IBA (mg L−1) | 2,4-D (mg L−1) | JZ60 Weight (g) | LWCZ Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sucrose | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.000 ± 0.000 f | 0.000 ± 0.000 h |
| 2 | Sucrose | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.343 ± 0.081 abc | 0.212 ± 0.035 cd |
| 3 | Sucrose | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.283 ± 0.067 bcd | 0.178 ± 0.029 d |
| 4 | Sucrose & Maltose | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.000 ± 0.000 f | 0.000 ± 0.000 h |
| 5 | Sucrose & Maltose | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.334 ± 0.079 abc | 0.179 ± 0.030 d |
| 6 | Sucrose & Maltose | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.000 ± 0.000 f | 0.000 ± 0.000 h |
| 7 | Maltose | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.363 ± 0.086 abc | 0.254 ± 0.038 bc |
| 8 | Maltose | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.257 ± 0.061 cde | 0.164 ± 0.024 d |
| 9 | Maltose | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.176 ± 0.070 de | 0.074 ± 0.023 efg |
| 10 | Sucrose | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.399 ± 0.095 a | 0.351 ± 0.067 a |
| 11 | Sucrose | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.226 ± 0.054 de | 0.080 ± 0.025 ef |
| 12 | Sucrose | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.205 ± 0.049 de | 0.103 ± 0.021 e |
| 13 | Sucrose & Maltose | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.275 ± 0.065 cd | 0.173 ± 0.029 d |
| 14 | Sucrose & Maltose | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.360 ± 0.085 abc | 0.247 ± 0.044 bc |
| 15 | Sucrose & Maltose | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 0.154 ± 0.061 e | 0.043 ± 0.010 fgh |
| 16 | Maltose | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 0.384 ± 0.091 ab | 0.284 ± 0.038 b |
| 17 | Maltose | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.181 ± 0.071 de | 0.029 ± 0.008 gh |
| 18 | Maltose | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.272 ± 0.065 cd | 0.184 ± 0.030 d |
| Test No. | Vector | Bacterial Optical Density | Infection Duration (min) | AS Concentration (μM) | Co-Cultivation Duration (days) | EGFP-Positive Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JZ60 | LWCZ | ||||||
| 1 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.6 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1.85 ± 1.60 f | 0.93 ± 1.60 f |
| 2 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.6 | 20 | 100 | 3 | 44.44 ± 7.35 d | 38.89 ± 5.56 de |
| 3 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.6 | 30 | 200 | 4 | 31.48 ± 11.56 e | 32.41 ± 4.24 e |
| 4 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.8 | 10 | 100 | 4 | 43.51 ± 3.21 d | 38.89 ± 2.78 de |
| 5 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.8 | 20 | 200 | 2 | 42.59 ± 6.42 de | 43.52 ± 4.24 d |
| 6 | pCAMBIA1301 | 0.8 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 1.85 ± 1.60 f | 1.85 ± 3.21 f |
| 7 | pCAMBIA1301 | 1.0 | 10 | 200 | 3 | 41.66 ± 2.78 de | 42.59 ± 4.24 d |
| 8 | pCAMBIA1301 | 1.0 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 1.85 ± 1.60 f | 1.85 ± 1.60 f |
| 9 | pCAMBIA1301 | 1.0 | 30 | 100 | 2 | 37.03 ± 5.78 de | 33.33 ± 4.81 e |
| 10 | pCY | 0.6 | 10 | 200 | 4 | 57.40 ± 11.23 c | 60.19 ± 1.60 c |
| 11 | pCY | 0.6 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 3.70 ± 1.61 f | 2.78 ± 2.78 f |
| 12 | pCY | 0.6 | 30 | 100 | 3 | 60.18 ± 5.78 bc | 54.63 ± 1.60 c |
| 13 | pCY | 0.8 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 3.70 ± 1.61 f | 3.70 ± 3.21 f |
| 14 | pCY | 0.8 | 20 | 100 | 4 | 74.07 ± 4.24 a | 67.59 ± 1.60 ab |
| 15 | pCY | 0.8 | 30 | 200 | 2 | 58.33 ± 2.78 c | 61.11 ± 5.56 bc |
| 16 | pCY | 1.0 | 10 | 100 | 2 | 66.66 ± 5.56 abc | 60.19 ± 1.60 c |
| 17 | pCY | 1.0 | 20 | 200 | 3 | 70.36 ± 6.99 ab | 74.07 ± 3.21 a |
| 18 | pCY | 1.0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 2.78 ± 4.81 f | 1.85 ± 1.60 f |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Song, J.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Wei, K.; Han, P.; Wan, Z.; Li, X. A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for Ziziphus jujuba. Plants 2026, 15, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050843
Song J, Zhang Z, Shi J, Wei K, Han P, Wan Z, Li X. A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for Ziziphus jujuba. Plants. 2026; 15(5):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050843
Chicago/Turabian StyleSong, Junyu, Zhong Zhang, Jingnan Shi, Kexin Wei, Peilin Han, Zhongwu Wan, and Xingang Li. 2026. "A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for Ziziphus jujuba" Plants 15, no. 5: 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050843
APA StyleSong, J., Zhang, Z., Shi, J., Wei, K., Han, P., Wan, Z., & Li, X. (2026). A Fruit-Pulp-Derived Callus-Level Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Platform for Ziziphus jujuba. Plants, 15(5), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050843

