Next Article in Journal
CRU–Urea Mixtures Improve Maize Protein Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Regions Associated with Drought Tolerance and Other Traits in Lentils (Lens sp.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response Mechanism of Litter to Soil Water Conservation Functions Under the Density Gradient of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Forests in the Loess Plateau of the Western Shanxi Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Calcium Cyanamide as an Alternative Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Agronomic and Environmental Impacts

by
Mzwakhile Petros Zakhe Simelane
1,
Puffy Soundy
1 and
Martin Makgose Maboko
1,2,*
1
Department of Crop Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
2
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2026, 15(5), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050673
Submission received: 3 December 2025 / Revised: 5 February 2026 / Accepted: 9 February 2026 / Published: 24 February 2026

Abstract

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2), commercially known as Perlka®, is re-emerging as a multifunctional nitrogen (N) fertilizer with significant agronomic and environmental advantages. Composed of 19.8% nitrogen and 50% calcium oxide (CaO), CaCN2 not only supplies slow-release nitrogen but also acts as a liming agent, improving soil pH and structure. Its transformation pathway: cyanamide → urea → ammonium → nitrate—ensures a gradual nitrogen release that aligns with crop demand, enhances nitrogen use efficiency, and minimizes nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Additionally, the presence of dicyandiamide, a known nitrification inhibitor, further stabilizes nitrogen in the soil. Field studies across diverse cropping systems, including curly endive and short-day onions, have demonstrated that CaCN2 improves yield, crop quality, and soil health. In onions, preplant application of 80 kg ha−1 N from CaCN2 increased bulb yield by up to 18%, enhanced phytochemical content (e.g., phenolics and flavonoids), and reduced nitrate leaching by over 40% compared to urea and limestone ammonium nitrate (LAN). In curly endive, CaCN2 significantly improved ascorbic acid, total soluble solids, and phenolic content, particularly in fall-grown crops, while reducing nitrate accumulation and improving physiological and recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen. Beyond its role as a nutrient supplier, CaCN2 exhibits biocidal properties that suppress soil-borne pathogens such as Sclerotinia and Plasmodiophora brassicae, reduce weed pressure, and stimulate beneficial microbial activity. Its high calcium content also addresses physiological disorders linked to calcium deficiency, such as tip-burn and blossom-end rot. However, proper application timing and dosage are critical to avoid phytotoxicity, especially in sensitive crops. This review synthesizes current knowledge on CaCN2’s chemical behavior, agronomic performance, and environmental implications, and identifies research gaps to guide its optimized use in climate-smart and resource-efficient agriculture.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) fertilization remains a cornerstone of modern agriculture, profoundly influencing both the yield and nutritional quality of vegetable crops [1]. As a fundamental component of amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids, chlorophyll, and various secondary metabolites, nitrogen is indispensable for plant metabolism, growth, and development [2]. Its strategic application underpins global food security by supporting intensive crop production systems. However, the widespread and often excessive use of conventional nitrogen fertilizers has led to a cascade of environmental challenges, including nitrate leaching, greenhouse gas emissions, and eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems [2,3,4]. These issues are particularly pronounced in developing regions, where limited access to precision agriculture tools and erratic climatic conditions exacerbate nitrogen inefficiencies and ecological degradation.
In response to these concerns, there is an urgent need for sustainable fertilization strategies that reconcile productivity with environmental stewardship. Conventional nitrogen sources such as urea and ammonium nitrate, while effective in promoting rapid vegetative growth, are highly soluble and quickly converted into nitrate, a mobile form that is prone to leaching, volatilization, and denitrification [5]. Alarmingly, it is estimated that only 30–50% of applied nitrogen is absorbed by crops, with the remainder lost to the environment, resulting in both economic inefficiencies and ecological harm [6].
Among the emerging alternatives, calcium cyanamide (CaCN2), commercially known as Perlka® (produced by AlzChem, Trostberg, Germany), is gaining renewed attention as a multifunctional nitrogen fertilizer. First synthesized in the late 19th century, CaCN2 contains 19.8% nitrogen and offers a slow-release profile that aligns nutrient availability with crop demand [7]. Beyond its role as a nitrogen source, CaCN2 functions as a soil conditioner and a biocontrol agent. Historically used in Europe under the trade name Azotniak, it was effective in weed suppression and soil disinfection, although its powdered form posed handling challenges that led to its decline in use [7,8,9]. Modern formulations have addressed these limitations, reintroducing CaCN2 in granulated form suitable for precision agriculture in a wide range of vegetable crops [10].
Agronomically, CaCN2 offers several advantages over conventional fertilizers. It supplies calcium, which acts as a liming agent to neutralize soil acidity and improve soil structure [11]. Its slow hydrolysis in moist soil releases cyanamide, which is gradually converted to urea, ammonium, and nitrate, thereby reducing nitrogen losses and enhancing nitrogen use efficiency [12]. Moreover, CaCN2 acts as a natural nitrification inhibitor, delaying the microbial conversion of ammonium to nitrate and thus minimizing leaching and gaseous losses [13,14].
Beyond nutrient management, CaCN2 contributes to integrated pest and disease control [15]. It has been shown to suppress weed seed germination, reduce populations of soil-borne pathogens such as Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Fusarium oxysporum, and mitigate nematode infestations [16,17]. These properties are particularly valuable in intensive vegetable systems with limited crop rotation, where pest and disease pressures are high.
Recent field studies have consistently reinforced the agronomic and environmental advantages of calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) across a variety of crops and growing conditions. In curly endive (Cichorium endivia L.), Sabatino et al. [18] demonstrated that pre-transplant application of CaCN2 at 100 kg ha−1 N significantly enhanced functional quality traits, including ascorbic acid, total phenolic content, and total soluble solids, compared to conventional ammonium nitrate fertilization. Notably, CaCN2-treated plants exhibited lower nitrate accumulation and higher physiological nitrogen use efficiency (PE_N), particularly in fall-grown crops, suggesting improved nitrogen synchronization and reduced environmental losses. Similar improvements in crop quality and nitrogen efficiency have been reported in lettuce [19] and strawberry [20], further validating CaCN2’s multifunctional role in horticultural systems.
Complementary findings in short-day onion production further underscore CaCN2’s efficacy. Simelane et al. [21] reported that preplant application of 80 kg ha−1 N from CaCN2 significantly increased bulb yield, reduced nitrate leaching, and minimized premature bolting compared to urea and LAN application. When combined with topdressings of urea or LAN, CaCN2 further enhanced plant vigour, bulb development, and nitrogen use efficiency [21]. Additionally, CaCN2 improved bulb nutritional quality by increasing phenolic and flavonoid concentrations, antioxidant activity, and essential mineral content [22]. However, excessive application rates of CaCN2 (e.g., 600 kg ha−1) were associated with postharvest issues such as sprouting and rot, highlighting the importance of optimized dosing strategies [22].
From an environmental standpoint, CaCN2 offers distinct advantages. Under simulated rainfall conditions, nitrogen leaching losses from CaCN2 (130 kg ha−1 N) were as low as 4.2% in clay soils, substantially lower than those observed with urea or LAN, particularly on steep slopes prone to runoff [22]. Moreover, its biocidal properties reduce the need for chemical herbicides and fungicides, supporting more integrated and sustainable crop management systems [9,23]. These findings collectively position CaCN2 as a viable and environmentally responsible alternative to conventional nitrogen fertilizers in both leafy and bulb vegetable production systems.
Despite these promising attributes, a comprehensive synthesis of CaCN2’s agronomic and environmental performance remains limited. Most studies have focused on isolated aspects such as nitrogen efficiency, disease suppression, or soil pH modification. A unified, critical review that integrates these findings and evaluates CaCN2’s comparative performance across diverse agroecological contexts is lacking. Moreover, regional variability in soil types, climate, and cropping systems limits the generalizability of existing data, highlighting the need for context-specific research and recommendations.
This review aims to bridge that gap by providing a comprehensive evaluation of calcium cyanamide as an alternative nitrogen fertilizer. It synthesises current knowledge on its agronomic benefits, environmental behaviour, and multifunctional roles in sustainable cropping systems. As agriculture faces increasing pressure to reduce its ecological footprint while maintaining productivity, CaCN2 emerges as a promising tool for climate-smart and regenerative farming.
By critically analysing the available evidence and identifying key areas for further research, this review seeks to inform researchers, extension agents, and practitioners about the potential of CaCN2 to enhance nitrogen use efficiency, reduce environmental harm, and support resilient vegetable production systems. Its reintroduction into modern agriculture represents a significant step toward more integrated, efficient, and ecologically responsible fertilization strategies.

2. Chemical Properties and Soil Transformations

2.1. Composition and Physicochemical Characteristics

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2), commonly supplied in granular, dust-reduced formulations (e.g., Perlka®), typically contains ~19.8% total N and >50% CaO, conferring both nitrogen supply and a net liming capacity per unit product and per unit N applied [24,25,26,27]. Modern commercial granules are wax-coated to reduce fines, moisture uptake, and premature hydrolysis during handling and storage, improving application uniformity relative to legacy powdered forms [26,27,28].
From a physicochemical standpoint, CaCN2 is sparingly soluble in water but reactive in moist soils, where hydrolysis proceeds rapidly once the fertilizer is incorporated and wetted. The accompanying release of Ca(OH)2 contributes to a local pH rise at the reaction front, influencing subsequent chemical and enzymatic steps [25,29,30,31,32]. Typical industrial specifications also include minor fractions of nitrate-N and dicyandiamide (DCD) present at manufacture, alongside DCD formed in situ during transformation [24,28].

2.2. Sequential Transformation Pathway in Moist Soil

Following incorporation and wetting, CaCN2 undergoes a multi-step transformation that regulates nitrogen speciation in the soil solution and exchange complex:
(i)
Initial hydrolysis to hydrogen cyanamide and calcium dihydroxide
CaCN2 + 2H2O → Ca(OH)2 + H2CN2
The product H2CN2 (hydrogen cyanamide) is a reactive intermediate; co-formation of Ca(OH)2 drives a local increase in pH, characteristic of CaCN2’s liming action [25,26,32].
(ii)
Conversion of cyanamide to urea and dicyandiamide (DCD)
H2CN2 → CO(NH2)2 + DCD
This step closes the highly reactive cyanamide phase and introduces DCD, a recognised nitrification inhibitor that slows the microbial oxidation of NH4+ to NO3 [25,28].
(iii)
Urea hydrolysis to ammonium (enzyme-mediated)
CO(NH2)2 + H2O → 2NH4+ + CO2
Generated NH4+ is less mobile than nitrate and is subject to exchange adsorption; the local pH (from Ca (OH)2) can further influence speciation and sorption [31,33,34,35].
(iv)
Nitrification: ammonium → nitrate
NH4+ → NO3 (Nitrosomonas/Nitrobacter)
This oxidation is delayed in CaCN2-amended soils by DCD, which inhibits the ammonia-oxidising step; the liming environment also modulates microbial activity and enzyme kinetics [25,28,36,37,38].
Time-course observations reported for the cyanamide → urea step range ~7–14 days under typical field moisture/temperature conditions; urea hydrolysis follows rapidly in biologically active soils, while nitrification is slowed proportionally to DCD presence, temperature, and moisture regime [25,26,32,33,36].

2.3. Kinetics and Controlling Soil Factors (pH, Moisture, Temperature, Matrix)

The rates and relative dominance of the reactions outlined in Section 2.2 are highly condition-dependent:
  • Moisture: Hydrolysis of Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) and subsequent cyanamide transformations require adequate soil water. Dry or intermittently wetted soils prolong the cyanamide phase and slow progression to urea/NH4+, extending the time window in which reactive intermediates are present [25,32,33].
  • pH and liming front: Co-formation of Ca(OH)2 elevates local pH, which can (i) affect cyanamide condensation/polymerisation equilibria, (ii) alter urease activity, and (iii) shift sorption–desorption behaviour of NH4+/NH3. The liming front propagates with diffusion and mixing, creating micro-zones where kinetics differ from bulk soil [25,31,33,38].
  • Temperature: Reaction and enzyme rates increase with temperature; in cool soils, cyanamide persistence and the interval before safe availability of NH4+/NO3 are extended, whereas warm, moist conditions compress the sequence toward urea → NH4+ formation [25,32,33].
  • Soil texture and organic matter: In coarse-textured (sandy) matrices, faster infiltration may speed hydrolysis but reduce residence time of intermediates; fine-textured or high-OM soils provide greater adsorption capacity (particularly for NH4+), influencing temporary partitioning of N forms and the spatial distribution of the liming effect [24,31,33].
Collectively, these factors explain field variability in the observed timing between application and the appearance of plant-available NH4+/NO3, and they underpin practical guidance (timing and incorporation) provided later in the manuscript to prevent phytotoxic exposure to cyanamide [25,26,32,33,38].

2.4. Intermediates and By-Products: Hydrogen Cyanamide and Dicyandiamide (DCD)

Two intermediates are central to CaCN2 chemistry in soil:
  • Hydrogen cyanamide (H2CN2): The immediate hydrolysis product; reactive and short-lived under favourable moisture/temperature. Its chemical reactivity underpins transient biocidal behaviour noted historically, but in Chapter Two, we emphasise chemistry: rapid conversion reduces persistence when moisture and temperature are adequate [25,26,32].
  • Dicyandiamide (DCD): Present as a minor manufactured fraction and formed in situ during cyanamide transformation. DCD inhibits ammonia oxidation (first step of nitrification), thereby delaying NO3 formation and prolonging the NH4+ phase. The extent and duration of inhibition depend on DCD concentration, temperature, and microbial community responsiveness [28].
These intermediates define the temporal speciation of N and the lag to nitrate formation following CaCN2 application. Their appearance/disappearance is constrained by the same environmental drivers outlined in Section 2.3 [25,28,32].

2.5. Nitrogen Speciation and Partitioning (Chemical Perspective)

Within the transformation sequence, soil nitrogen cycles through cyanamide → urea → ammonium → nitrate. From a chemical vantage:
  • Urea → NH4+ is enzyme-catalysed and typically rapid in biologically active soils; NH4+ can adsorb to exchange sites, reducing immediate mobility and shifting equilibria with NH3 depending on pH [31,33].
  • NH4+ → NO3 is microbially mediated; the presence of DCD introduces an induction period before nitrate predominates. The local liming effect can additionally modulate enzyme activity and sorption, indirectly influencing the NH4+/NO3 balance [25,28,38].
  • The net liming provided by Ca(OH)2 may alter carbonate equilibria and buffering capacity over the short term, though bulk pH changes depend on dose, soil buffering, and mixing [24,25,31].
This speciation pathway is foundational for later sections (Agronomic Benefits and Environmental Impacts), where plant uptake, leaching potential, and emission pathways are analysed; here we confine the discussion to chemical transformations and partitioning [25,31,33].

2.6. Handling Chemistry and Stability

Because Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) is reactive in the presence of water, storage and application protocols seek to minimise premature hydrolysis and worker exposure to reactive intermediates. Granular, wax-coated products show improved stability, reduced dust, and unlimited shelf life if kept dry and sealed; moisture ingress can initiate hydrolysis and release alkaline reaction products and volatile species linked to subsequent steps (e.g., NH3 from NH4+/NH3 equilibria in high-pH microsites) [39,40]. These aspects are operational rather than agronomic; they are summarised here to complete the chemical profile of the product and are referenced more fully in later practical guidelines [39,40,41].

3. Agronomic Benefits

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) is recognised for its unique nitrogen-release profile, which aligns well with the physiological demands of crops. Upon application to moist soil, CaCN2 undergoes a multi-step transformation through hydrogen cyanamide, urea, ammonium (NH4+), and finally nitrate (NO3) [20,26,38]. This gradual conversion ensures a sustained nitrogen supply and reduces nutrient losses via leaching or volatilization. The presence of dicyandiamide (DCD), a nitrification inhibitor formed during CaCN2 breakdown, further delays the conversion of NH4+ to NO3 and enhances nitrogen use efficiency [26,38]. This slow-release behaviour is particularly advantageous in high-rainfall or irrigated systems where conventional nitrogen fertilizers are prone to rapid leaching.

Agronomic Performance: Slow-Release Effects, Yield, and Quality

Calcium cyanamide’s slow-release nitrogen behaviour differs from highly soluble fertilizers such as urea, limestone ammonium nitrate (LAN), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). Comparative studies show that CaCN2 releases nitrogen gradually through the cyanamide → urea → NH4+ → NO3 sequence, increasing NH4+ residence time and lowering losses relative to urea or ammonium-nitrate programmes. Pleysier and de Willigen [42] reported higher nitrogen efficiency of CaCN2 across multiple soils versus urea/ammonium nitrate due to delayed nitrification and improved retention. Suzuki et al. [38] demonstrated that CaCN2 increased soil pH, reduced nitrification gene abundance, and lowered N2O emissions compared with urea. Consistent with these observations, meta-evidence on nitrification inhibitors indicates that DCD (formed in situ during CaCN2 transformation) slows the NH4+ → NO3 conversion, reducing leaching and improving nitrogen use efficiency [13]. Collectively, these studies indicate that CaCN2 provides more stable nitrogen availability than urea, LAN, or CAN, especially in leaching-prone environments.
Numerous field studies show that CaCN2 improves nitrogen use efficiency while enhancing crop yield and quality. In leafy vegetables such as lettuce, CaCN2 reduces nitrate accumulation in edible tissues while maintaining or increasing biomass [19]. In curly endive, pre-transplant CaCN2 at 100 kg ha−1 N significantly increased fresh head weight, visual quality, ascorbic acid, and total phenolics, with the strongest effects during spring–summer cycles when nitrogen losses are higher [18]. Strawberry grown on CaCN2-treated soil exhibited greater vegetative growth, higher antioxidant capacity, and improved fruit quality [20]. Grafted melon and eggplant systems also showed enhanced vigour and yield, with reduced symptoms of Fusarium and Verticillium wilts, following CaCN2 application [23].
Across diverse soils and environments, CaCN2 provides multifaceted agronomic benefits. In onion production, CaCN2 improves bulb size, uniformity, and marketable yield via synchronised nitrogen supply [21]. In Australian calabrese (broccoli) trials, banded CaCN2 reduced clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae) and doubled marketable yields relative to untreated controls, illustrating phytosanitary value alongside nutrition [39]. These advantages are pronounced in sandy-loam soils, which are susceptible to leaching and have low buffering capacity. CaCN2 has been shown to increase soil pH, shift microbial communities, reduce nitrification/denitrification gene abundance, and lower N2O emissions [38]. During its transient cyanamide phase, CaCN2 also exhibits fungicidal, herbicidal, and molluscicidal activity against pathogens such as Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Phytophthora capsici, and P. brassicae [40]. In composting systems, CaCN2 enhances sanitation and total nitrogen retention—effects that may translate to low-CEC field soils [41].
On sandy-loam soils in South Africa, CaCN2 significantly increased total and marketable onion yields, improved bulb uniformity, and enhanced nitrogen use efficiency relative to urea and ammonium-nitrate programmes [21]. CaCN2-treated onions also displayed improved storability, firmer bulbs, and reduced postharvest decay [22]. In addition, CaCN2 contributes to soil disinfection, pH buffering, and improved microbial balance, supporting nutrient cycling and recovery of soil function in coarse-textured soils [42,43]. Overall, agronomic benefits extend beyond yield to include improved uniformity, reduced physiological disorders, and enhanced postharvest quality, arising from the combined effects of slow-release nitrogen, calcium supply, transient sanitation, and liming-driven changes to soil structure and microbial activity [26,43].

4. Environmental Impacts

4.1. Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) improves nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) through both recovery and physiological pathways. Its slow-release transformation sequence—cyanamide → urea → ammonium (NH4+) → nitrate (NO3)—provides nitrogen in closer synchrony with crop demand, thereby reducing losses and increasing plant uptake compared with more soluble nitrogen sources [25,28,44]. During this process, dicyandiamide (DCD) forms in situ and acts as a nitrification inhibitor, delaying the conversion of NH4+ to NO3 and lowering losses via leaching and denitrification [44,45,46].
Physiologically, CaCN2 programs are often associated with enhanced nitrogen assimilation and lower nitrate accumulation in edible tissues [47]. For example, lettuce and curly endive fertilized with CaCN2 have consistently shown reduced tissue nitrate compared with ammonium nitrate or urea, contributing to improved food safety and quality [18,19]. In addition, short-day onion trials report higher marketable yield and improved nitrogen-use metrics when CaCN2 is used as a pre-plant source, particularly on leaching-prone soils [21,22]. The localized liming micro-environment generated by Ca(OH)2 during CaCN2 hydrolysis can further modulate enzyme activity and microbial pathways in acidic or coarse-textured soils, supporting higher NUE where leaching pressure is elevated [25,28,44]. To maintain these benefits and limit NH3 volatilization on high-pH surfaces, CaCN2 should be incorporated into moist soil and followed by light irrigation where appropriate [24,25,31,33].

4.2. Leaching and Emissions

CaCN2’s most compelling environmental advantage is its ability to reduce nitrate leaching, particularly under high rainfall or intensive irrigation [21]. Long-term studies in Portugal and tropical environments found that CaCN2-treated soils retained nitrogen more effectively than soils fertilized with ammonium nitrate or urea; in some trials, nitrate leaching losses were reported as low as ~3% of applied N with CaCN2—substantially lower than conventional programs [48,49]. Under simulated rainfall and in field comparisons, clay soils receiving CaCN2 also exhibited low loss fractions when dosing and timing were optimized [22].
Calcium cyanamide can additionally lower nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. In Japanese vegetable systems, lime-nitrogen applications significantly reduced N2O fluxes, with pronounced effects in poorly drained soils [30]. These reductions arise from the DCD-mediated delay of nitrification, which limits nitrate availability for denitrifiers, and from the liming effect that alters microbial pathway kinetics [33,38].
Examples of crop systems benefiting from CaCN2 in leaching/emissions contexts include curly endive [18], organic tomato with weed/disease control co-benefits [19], strawberry in protected cultivation [20], short-day onion under rainfall/irrigation [21,22], and calabrese/broccoli in clubroot-affected soils where CaCN2 improves sanitary status and marketable yield [39]. Because temperature and moisture influence both transformation rates and inhibitor persistence, pre-plant intervals should be adjusted to local conditions to sustain leaching and emissions reductions [25,33,38]. Benefits are generally larger in sandy or coarse-textured soils (high leaching risk) and poorly drained fields (higher denitrification potential) [21,48,49].

4.3. Biocidal and Disease Suppression Effects

Beyond nutrient management, CaCN2 exhibits biocidal properties that can reduce reliance on pesticides. In moist soil, the transient hydrogen-cyanamide phase creates a short-lived phytotoxic environment that inhibits pathogen sporulation and weed seed germination [27,42]. Suppression has been documented for Plasmodiophora brassicae (clubroot), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (white rot), Fusarium oxysporum, Verticillium spp., and Olpidium bornovanus [50,51,52,53]. These outcomes are mediated by both direct toxicity during the cyanamide phase and indirect stimulation of beneficial or antagonistic microbial groups [54]. CaCN2 use has also been associated with greater bacterial diversity and higher extracellular enzyme activities (e.g., amylase, protease, phosphatase), features commonly linked to soil suppressiveness [26,37].
Examples of crops reporting phytosanitary or quality co-benefits include brassicas (clubroot suppression; higher marketable yield) [39], strawberry (higher fruit quality and antioxidant traits) [20], onion (improved bulb uniformity and storability) [22], and organic tomato (integrated weed and soil-borne disease management alongside fertilization) [19]. CaCN2 also provides weed suppression—especially in pre-plant applications—by inhibiting seed germination, and it has been incorporated into integrated weed-management programs to reduce herbicide inputs [40,55,56]. To translate these benefits safely into practice, observe pre-plant waiting intervals so the cyanamide phase dissipates before seeding or transplanting; integrate CaCN2 with rotation, straw/organic amendments, or solarization where suitable to support microbial recovery and long-term soil function [20,37,42]. Timing and dose should align with crop sensitivity and local soil moisture/temperature to avoid phytotoxicity while maximizing sanitation and environmental gains [25,42].

5. Soil Health and Microbial Balance

Soil health is a cornerstone of sustainable agriculture, encompassing physical structure, chemical fertility, and biological activity [22]. The soil microbial community plays a pivotal role in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition and disease suppression. However, intensive agricultural practices, particularly the overuse of soluble synthetic nitrogen fertilizers can disrupt microbial diversity and function, reducing soil resilience and productivity [36,37,56].

5.1. Calcium Cyanamide and Soil Microbial Dynamics

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) is a multifunctional input that supplies nitrogen while modulating soil microbial ecology. After application, CaCN2 hydrolyzes to cyanamide and subsequently to urea, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3); during these transformations, dicyandiamide (DCD) forms in situ and acts as a nitrification inhibitor. By delaying NH4+ → NO3, CaCN2 reduces nitrogen losses and alters microbial nitrogen-cycling pathways [21,38].
Microcosm and field observations indicate that CaCN2 can suppress nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and shift bacterial community composition relative to urea-based programs. A local pH rise (via Ca(OH)2) is often associated with reduced activity or abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers, consistent with lower N2O potential and altered nitrogen transformations [23,38]. Studies have also reported increases in extracellular enzyme activities (e.g., amylase, protease, phosphatase) and changes in microbial network connectivity following CaCN2 use, suggesting enhanced nutrient turnover once the transient biocidal phase subsides [26,37].
Examples of crop systems showing microbial or functional improvements under CaCN2 include brassicas with clubroot pressure (enhanced suppressiveness and marketable yield) [39], organic tomato, where weed and soil-borne disease management co-benefits accompany fertilization [19], and strawberry in protected cultivation with improved plant vigor and antioxidant capacity [20].

5.2. Microbial Recovery and Soil Fertility

Although the cyanamide phase is transiently biocidal, effects are dose- and time-dependent rather than uniformly detrimental. In cucumber systems, CaCN2 combined with pepper straw improved yield and soil fertility while allowing microbial communities to recover during the growing season [39]. Populations of culturable bacteria and actinomycetes typically rebound within weeks, reflecting microbial resilience and restoration of soil biological activity [37]. Integrating CaCN2 with organic amendments (e.g., straw return, composts) and observing pre-plant waiting intervals (see Section 6) helps balance sanitation benefits with rapid reestablishment of beneficial microbiota [15,36]. Examples highlighting recovery and fertility gains include cucumber with pepper straw (yield and fertility improvements alongside microbial recovery) [39], strawberry systems where microbial diversity and nutrient turnover increase during the season [20], and onion rotations that pair CaCN2 with residue management to support microbial rebound [22].

5.3. Disease of Suppression and Microbial Balance

Beyond nutrient dynamics, CaCN2 has demonstrated efficacy against soil-borne pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum and Plasmodiophora brassicae. Shi et al. [36] reported lower pathogen abundance alongside increases in beneficial microbial groups, indicating a shift toward suppressive soils. In strawberry systems, CaCN2 treatment reduced seedling mortality by lowering pathogen loads and increasing beneficial taxa (e.g., actinomycetes, Alphaproteobacteria), while enhancing bacterial network connectivity and soil nutrient availability [37].
Illustrative crop examples include brassicas (clubroot suppression; higher marketable yield) [39], strawberry (lower seedling mortality and improved quality traits) [20,36], and onion (improved bulb uniformity and storability when phytosanitary effects complement nutrient management) [22].
Align CaCN2 dose and timing with crop sensitivity, maintain pre-plant waiting intervals, and pair applications with organic amendments or residue returns. This approach sustains the sanitation benefits of the cyanamide phase while supporting rapid microbial recovery and long-term soil function [15,36].

6. Practical Considerations and Limitations

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) delivers agronomic and environmental benefits, but disciplined implementation is essential to avoid phytotoxicity and to protect soil biological function. This section consolidates the key practices when to apply, how to incorporate, and how to integrate CaCN2 within broader programs so that efficacy is maximized while risks are minimized.

6.1. Application Timing and Incorporation Requirements

Effective use of CaCN2 begins with timing. In moist soil, CaCN2 hydrolyses to hydrogen cyanamide a short-lived, biocidal intermediate before transforming to urea and then plant-available forms. To protect emerging seedlings, CaCN2 should be incorporated into the soil, followed by irrigation, and allowed sufficient time to transform before planting [57,58]. Incorporation ensures uniform distribution and reduces volatilization losses; surface-only applications, especially on alkaline soils, increase the risk of NH3 loss and localized injury [24,25,31,33].
As a practical rule, apply CaCN2 at least 14 days before sowing or transplanting, with longer intervals in cool or dry conditions. In transplanted crops, split programs are common for example, ~500 kg ha−1 as a base dressing, followed by a second application 14–21 days after transplanting—provided the first application is safely transformed by transplant time [59]. To further manage risk, band placement can keep the cyanamide reaction zone away from the seed line in sensitive crops, while deeper incorporation is appropriate for robust crops and heavier soils [24,25,31,33]. Specific guidelines for different crops are presented in Table 1.
Integration into whole-farm practice also matters. CaCN2 can be paired with rotations and organic amendments (e.g., straw or compost) or solarization to enhance short-term sanitation while supporting microbial recovery. In high-rainfall systems, coordinate CaCN2 with nitrification management and irrigation scheduling to sustain nitrogen use efficiency and curb losses. Always separate CaCN2 from strong acids and from sensitive seedlings in both time (a clear pre-plant interval) and space (banding or deeper placement). Align the application with transplant dates and anticipated weather so the cyanamide phase has fully dissipated by the time plants are established [20,37,42,57].

6.2. Waiting Periods to Avoid Phytotoxicity and Crop Sensitivity

The phytotoxicity of hydrogen cyanamide necessitates a waiting interval between CaCN2 application and planting to allow conversion into less toxic forms such as urea and ammonium. Failure to observe this interval can result in poor germination, stunted growth, and root damage, particularly in sensitive crops [42,55]. The required interval depends on soil moisture, temperature, and microbial activity; degradation is slower under cool or dry conditions. Sensitive crops—especially at early stages—include lettuce, spinach, and young brassica seedlings, which may exhibit chlorosis, root inhibition, and reduced vigour if exposed too soon after application [25,59]. Risk mitigation includes applying during fallow or preceding with tolerant species or using CaCN2 as a pre-plant soil-conditioning step to suppress pathogens and weeds once the cyanamide phase has dissipated [20,37,42].
Crop-specific waiting-interval notes. Leafy greens: strict pre-plant interval; incorporate and irrigate. Brassicas: observe full interval; favour band placement. Onions: respect intervals to avoid early stress. Strawberry transplants: apply pre-plant with sufficient lead time for dissipation [21,22,25].

6.3. Storage and Handling Precautions

Commercial CaCN2 is supplied as a granular, dust-reduced (often wax-coated) product to enhance stability and reduce handling risks; when stored dry in sealed packaging it has an unlimited shelf life [60]. Because CaCN2 is reactive with moisture, key precautions include avoid inhalation and skin contact (use gloves, eye protection, and a dust mask or respirator); store dry in a well-ventilated area with bags sealed and off the floor; and do not mix with acidic fertilizers or materials, which can accelerate decomposition and increase phytotoxicity [60,61]. If the product becomes damp, handle with caution and avoid application near sensitive crops or immediately prior to seeding or transplanting [60,61].

7. Comparative Analysis with Conventional Fertilizers

7.1. Agronomic Performance vs. Urea, LAN, and CAN

Calcium cyanamide (CaCN2) has been widely evaluated against conventional nitrogen fertilizers such as urea, limestone ammonium nitrate (LAN), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) in terms of yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and disease suppression. In vegetable crops such as lettuce, onion, and brassicas, CaCN2 performs comparably to or better than urea and CAN [18,42]. In calabrese (broccoli), CaCN2 application resulted in a doubling of marketable yield compared with untreated controls and outperformed urea in disease-susceptible soils [39]. CaCN2 also enhances soil health by increasing microbial diversity and suppressing soil-borne pathogens such as Plasmodiophora brassicae and Fusarium oxysporum, benefits not typically associated with urea or LAN [36,37].
Mechanistically, CaCN2’s staged transformation from cyanamide to urea, ammonium, and nitrate results in sustained ammonium availability and delayed nitrification due to dicyandiamide (DCD) formed in situ. This reduces leaching risk and supports higher plant uptake relative to soluble nitrogen fertilizers [13,38]. These advantages are most evident under leaching-prone or disease-susceptible conditions, such as coarse-textured soils or high-rainfall systems [18,21,22,39].

7.2. Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs

Economically, CaCN2 is generally more expensive per unit nitrogen than urea or LAN due to its manufacturing process and smaller market scale [60]. However, its multifunctional roles as a nitrogen source, liming material, and phytosanitary agent can reduce the need for additional lime, fungicides, and herbicides, partially offsetting its higher cost [25].
Environmentally, CaCN2 provides significant advantages. It decreases nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions because of the natural formation of DCD during its transformation in soil [30,45]. In long-term studies conducted in Portugal and tropical regions, CaCN2-treated soils retained over 90% of applied nitrogen, whereas urea and CAN programs showed substantially higher losses [49,60]. These benefits make CaCN2 a strong candidate for systems facing nutrient losses due to rainfall, irrigation, or poor soil structure [21,22,30,38].

8. Research Gaps and Future Directions

Despite its agronomic and environmental benefits, several research gaps remain before CaCN2 can be widely adopted in modern, sustainable agricultural systems.
  • Long-term, multi-location trials. Current studies often focus on specific crops or localized systems. Broader trials across diverse agroecological zones are needed to evaluate CaCN2 performance under varying soil, climate, and management conditions [20,42].
  • Integration with organic and regenerative systems. CaCN2’s disease-suppressive and soil-conditioning properties offer potential for regenerative agriculture, but its compatibility with organic certification remains uncertain. Research on blending CaCN2 with composts, cover crops, and microbial inoculants is needed [36,37].
  • Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) potential. Given CaCN2’s capacity to reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emissions, its role in CSA strategies such as greenhouse-gas mitigation and soil-carbon dynamics should be evaluated in long-term field studies [30,60].
  • Decision-support tools. Effective use of CaCN2 requires precise timing. Decision tools integrating weather forecasts, soil data, and crop phenology could improve recommendations for waiting intervals, incorporation depth, and split applications.
  • Crop-specific sensitivity thresholds. Further work is required to define safe timing, dose, and band placement for sensitive crops such as leafy vegetables, young brassicas, and strawberries [21,25].
  • Transformation kinetics under field variability. More research is needed on cyanamide → urea → NH4+ → NO3 conversion under different pH, temperature, and moisture regimes to refine pre-plant interval guidance [25,33].
  • Comparative meta-analysis. Synthesizing results across systems to compare CaCN2 with urea, LAN, and CAN for yield, quality, NUE, nitrate leaching, and N2O/NH3 emissions would help define benefit ranges and strengthen agronomic recommendations [13,38,49,60].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.M., P.S. and M.P.Z.S.; methodology, M.M.M. and M.P.Z.S.; investigation, M.P.Z.S.; writing—original draft, M.P.Z.S. and M.M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M.M. and P.S.; supervision, P.S. and M.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting this work will be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kagan, K.; Jonak, K.; Wolińska, A. The impact of reduced N fertilization rates according to the “farm to fork” strategy on the environment and human health. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cao, W.; Sun, H.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Long, H.; Geng, X.; Zhang, Y. Progress in the study of plant nitrogen and potassium nutrition and their interaction mechanisms. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vasile Scăețeanu, G.; Madjar, R.M. The control of nitrogen in farmlands for sustainability in agriculture. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adebanjo-Aina, O.; Oludoye, O. Impact of nitrogen fertiliser usage in agriculture on water quality. Pollutants 2025, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Swify, S.; Mažeika, R.; Baltrusaitis, J.; Drapanauskaitė, D.; Barčauskaitė, K. Review: Modified urea fertilizers and their effects on improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability 2024, 16, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mahmud, K.; Panday, D.; Mergoum, A.; Missaoui, A. Nitrogen losses and potential mitigation strategies for a sustainable agroecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dixon, G.R. Managing clubroot disease (caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor.) by exploiting the interactions between cal-cium cyanamide fertilizer and soil microorganisms. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 155, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Du, Y.C.; Yuan, C.S.; Song, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Q.S.; Hou, Q.; Wang, D.; Wang, L. Enhancing soil health and strawberry disease resistance: The impact of calcium cyanamide treatment on soil microbiota and physicochemical properties. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1366814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dixon, G.R. Calcium cyanamide—A synoptic review of an environmentally begin fertilizer which enhances soil health. Acta Hortic. 2012, 938, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pagano, M.; Lunetta, E.; Belli, F.; Mocarli, G.; Cocozza, C.; Cacciotti, I. Advancements in agricultural nanotechnology: An updated review. Plants 2025, 14, 2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Olego, M.Á.; Quiroga, M.J.; Mendaña-Cuervo, C.; Cara-Jiménez, J.; López, R.; Garzón-Jimeno, E. Long-term effects of calcium-based liming materials on soil fertility, sustainability and rye production as soil quality indicators on a Typic Palexerult. Processes 2021, 9, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiu, Q.; Fan, D.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, X. Effect of calcium cyanamide on soil fungal community in successive tea-cuttings nursery. Agriculture 2021, 11, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiao, C.; Liu, L.; Hu, S.; Compton, J.E.; Greaver, T.L.; Li, Q. How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simujide, H.; Aorigele, C.; Wang, C.J.; Zhang, T.H.; Manda, B. Evaluation of calcium cyanamide addition during co-composting of manure and maize straw in a forced-aeration static-pile system. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2016, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Priyadarshini, C.; Lal, R.; Yuan, P.; Liu, W.; Adhikari, A.; Bhandari, S.; Xia, Y. Plant disease suppressiveness enhancement via soil health management. Biology 2025, 14, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mazzola, M.; Freilich, S. Prospects for biological soilborne disease control: Application of indigenous versus synthetic microbiomes. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sabatino, L.; Iapichino, G.; La Bella, S.; Tuttolomondo, T.; D’Anna, F.; Cardarelli, M.; Consentino, B.B.; Rouphael, Y. An appraisal of calcium cyanamide as alternative N source for spring-summer and fall season curly endive crops: Effects on crop performance, NUE and functional quality components. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Di Gioia, F.; Gonnella, M.; Buono, V.; Ayala, O.; Cacchiarelli, J.; Santamaria, P. Calcium cyanamide effects on nitrogen use efficiency, yield, nitrates, and dry matter content of lettuce. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sabatino, L.; D’Anna, F.; Prinzivalli, C.; Lapichino, G. Soil solarization and calcium cyanamide affect plant vigor, yield, nutritional traits, and nutraceutical compounds of strawberry grown in a protected cultivation system. Agronomy 2019, 9, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simelane, M.P.Z.; Soundy, P.; Maboko, M.M. Effect of calcium cyanamide as an alternative nitrogen source on growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of short-day onion. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Simelane, M.P.Z.; Soundy, P.; Maboko, M.M. Impacts of calcium cyanamide application as a nitrogen source on growth, yield, quality, and storage durability of short-day onion. HortScience 2024, 59, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bletsos, F.A. Grafting and calcium cyanamide as alternatives to methyl bromide for greenhouse eggplant production. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, X.; Chen, L.; Shi, Y.; Chai, A.; Fan, T.; Li, B.; Li, L. Response of microbial recovery rate to straw return after calcium cyanamide soil disinfection. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, J.; Sun, W.; Hu, Q.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Fu, J. Effects of cyanamide fertiliser on microbial community structure of continuous cropping soil. J. Zhejiang Univ. Agric. Life Sci. 2013, 39, 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bosch, M.; Amberger, A. Influence of long-term fertilizing with different forms of nitrogen fertilizer on soil biological activity. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd. 1983, 146, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Haenseler, C.M.; Moyer, T.R. Effect of calcium cyanamide on the soil microflora with special reference to certain plant parasites. Soil Sci. 1937, 43, 133–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amberger, A. Research on dicyandiamide as a nitrification inhibitor. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1989, 20, 1933–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor, M.; Miller, H.L. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yamamoto, A.; Akiyama, H.; Naokawa, T.; Yagi, K. Effect of lime-nitrogen application on N2O emission from an andosol vegetable field. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 58, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jacob, K.D.; Allison, F.E.; Braham, J.M. Chemical and biological studies with cyanamide and some of its transformation products. J. Agric. Res. 1924, 28, 37–69. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nõmmik, H. On decomposition of calcium cyanamide and dicyanamide in the soil. Acta Agric. Scand. 1958, 8, 404–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shaaban, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, L.; Hu, R.; Younas, A.; Nunez-Delgado, A.; Xu, P.; Sun, Z.; Lin, S.; Xu, X. Effects of pH change through liming on soil N2O emissions. Processes 2020, 8, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cui, L.; Li, D.; Wu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Song, Y.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, L.; Gong, P.; Zhang, K. Effects of nitrification inhibitors on nitrogen dynamics and ammonia oxidizers in three black agricultural soils. Agronomy 2022, 12, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, D.; Suter, H.; Islam, A.; Edis, R.; Freney, J.R.; Walker, C.N. Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2008, 46, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holtkamp, F.; Clemens, J.; Trimborn, M. Calcium cyanamide reduces methane and other trace gases during long-term storage of dairy cattle and fattening pig slurry. Waste Manag. 2023, 161, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Söchting, H.-P.; von Redwitz, C. Using calcium cyanamide for control of Senecio vulgaris in leafy vegetables. J. Crop Health 2025, 77, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suzuki, K.; Kashiwa, N.; Nomura, K.; Asiloglu, R.; Harada, N. Impacts of application of calcium cyanamide and the consequent increase in soil pH on N2O emissions and soil bacterial community compositions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2021, 57, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Güthner, T.; Mertschenk, B. Calcium cyanamide. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Thermo Fisher Scientific Chemicals, Inc. Safety Data Sheet: Calcium Cyanamide; Thermo Fisher Scientific: Ward Hill, MA, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  40. Donald, E.C.; Porter, I.J. Suppression of clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae) in vegetable brassicas by calcium cyanamide. Crop Prot. 2004, 23, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, S.C.; Tang, L.Z.; Shi, Q.; Yi, Z.X.; Zhou, W.X. Progress on application of calcium cyanamide in agricultural production. Soil Fertil. Sci. China 2017, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pleysier, J.L.; de Willigen, P.; van Noordwijk, M. Nitrogen efficiency of calcium cyanamide compared with other nitrogen fertilizers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1987, 12, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, L.; Huang, Y.; Ran, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, C.; Tang, J. Nitrogen transformation mechanisms and compost quality assessment in sustainable mesophilic aerobic composting of agricultural waste. Sustainability 2025, 17, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Q.F.; Xu, Q.F.; Qin, H.; Zhang, J.L.; Qian, M.; Qian, J.W. Effects of calcium cyanamide on soil microbial properties of intensively managed Phyllostachys violascens stands. J. Zhejiang Univ. 2014, 31, 352–357. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jindun Chemistry. How calcium cyanamide (lime nitrogen) enhances soil fertility and crop health. Jindun Chem. 2025, 43, 773–780. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Du, Y. Effect of dicyandiamide on grassland nitrous oxide emission rates: A meta-analysis. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2024, 33, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vilsmeier, K.; Amberger, A. Breakdown of calcium cyanamide fertilizers. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1978, 147, 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rathsack, K. Wirkung von Kalkstickstoff auf die Bodenbiologie. Landwirtsch. Forsch. 1978, 31, 347–358. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fan, C.; Wang, D.; Duan, P. Mitigating N2O emissions by dicyandiamide in tropical sandy soil. Sci. Direct. 2024, 35, 449–461. [Google Scholar]
  50. Brochado-Miranda, V.H. Influence of nitrogenous fertilizers upon some soil characteristics. Landwirtsch. Forsch. 1975, 29, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  51. Delgado, A.; Toro, M.; Memenza-Zegarra, M.; Zúñiga-Dávila, D. Control of white rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in strawberry using arbuscular mycorrhizae and plant-growth-promoting bacteria. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Memenza, M.; Mostacero, E.; Camarena, F.; Zúñiga, D. Disease control and plant growth promotion (PGP) of selected bacterial strains in Phaseolus vulgaris. In Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Beneficial Plant—Microbe Interactions; Gonzales-Andres, F., James, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 237–245. [Google Scholar]
  53. Huang, H.C.; Sun, S.K. Effects of calcium cyanamide on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1991, 23, 809–813. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stanghellini, M.; Mathews, D.; Misaghi, I. Pathogenicity and management of Olpidium bornovanus, a root pathogen of melons. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. da Silva, M.A.; Simões, V.J.L.P.; Silveira, D.C.; Savian, J.V.; Kunrath, T.R.; Duarte, L.P.; Coser, T.R.; Junklewitz, P.; de Faccio Carvalho, P.C. Effects of nitrogen sources on primary and secondary production from annual temperate and tropical pastures in Southern Brazil. Nitrogen 2024, 5, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sturkie, D.G. Control of weeds in lawns with calcium cyanamide. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 1937, 29, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shi, K.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.H.; Yu, Y.L.; Yu, J.Q. Effects of calcium cyanamide on soil microbial communities and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumberinum. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dixon, G.R.; Williamson, C.J. The use of calcium cyanamide in integrated pest management. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1985, 3, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar]
  59. Harling, R.; Oxley, S. Clubroot Disease of Oilseed Rape and Other Brassica Crops; Tech. Note TN602; Scottish Agricultural College: Edinburgh, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  60. McDonald, M.R.; McKeown, A.W.; Sturz, A.V. The potential of calcium cyanamide for disease suppression in vegetable crops. Acta Hortic. 2004, 635, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kamo, T.; Hiradate, S.; Fujii, Y. First isolation of natural cyanamide from hairy vetch. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Crop-specific timing and incorporation guidelines for CaCN2 (indicative best practices).
Table 1. Crop-specific timing and incorporation guidelines for CaCN2 (indicative best practices).
Crop/SystemWhen to ApplyIncorporation Depth/PlacementMinimum Waiting Interval *Notes
Leafy greens (lettuce, spinach)Pre-plant, before bed formationShallow incorporation; band away from seed line≥14 daysStrict interval to avoid seedling stress; irrigate after incorporation [18,19,24,25,31,33].
Brassicas/broccoliPre-plantBanded placement 5–10 cm from seed line≥14 daysBanding reduces early contact; clubroot contexts may benefit from sanitation co-effects [39].
Onions (direct-seeded or transplants)Pre-plant; optional split with early topdressIncorporate into bed zone; avoid seed line≥14 daysImproves bulb uniformity; light irrigation after incorporation; optional split after establishment [21,22].
Strawberry (transplants)Pre-plant, bed preparationIncorporate across bed profile≥14 daysAllow full dissipation before transplanting; quality and vigour benefits reported [20].
Organic/processing tomato (transplants)Pre-plantUniform incorporation; avoid transplant holes≥14 daysSupports weed and soil-borne disease suppression; confirm dissipation before transplanting [19,42].
* Extend the waiting interval under cool or dry conditions; shorten only where warm, moist, and biologically active soils accelerate transformation [25,31].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simelane, M.P.Z.; Soundy, P.; Maboko, M.M. Calcium Cyanamide as an Alternative Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Agronomic and Environmental Impacts. Plants 2026, 15, 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050673

AMA Style

Simelane MPZ, Soundy P, Maboko MM. Calcium Cyanamide as an Alternative Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Agronomic and Environmental Impacts. Plants. 2026; 15(5):673. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simelane, Mzwakhile Petros Zakhe, Puffy Soundy, and Martin Makgose Maboko. 2026. "Calcium Cyanamide as an Alternative Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Agronomic and Environmental Impacts" Plants 15, no. 5: 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050673

APA Style

Simelane, M. P. Z., Soundy, P., & Maboko, M. M. (2026). Calcium Cyanamide as an Alternative Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Agronomic and Environmental Impacts. Plants, 15(5), 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop