Foliar Application of Silicon and Sulfur Modifies Grain Mineral Composition of Spring Oats ( Avena sativa L.) Under Contrasting Seasonal Drought Conditions
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Assessment of Drought Severity in the Experimental Years Using the Pálfai Drought Index (PaDI)
2.2. Effects of Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Treatments, Genotype, and Environment on Macroelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.2.1. Effects of Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Treatments and Environment on Macroelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.2.2. Effects of Genotype and Environment on Macroelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.3. Effects of Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Treatments, Genotype, and Environment on Microelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.3.1. Effects of Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Treatments and Environment on Microelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.3.2. Effects of Genotype and Environment on Microelement Concentrations in Spring Oat Grain
2.4. Macro- and Microelement Concentrations as Affected by the Treatments, Varietal Differences, and Environmental Conditions
2.5. Treatment × Variety × Year Interactions
2.6. Pearson Correlation Analysis Results of Treatments, Sum of Precipitation During the Growing Season, PaDI Values, and Element Content in Spring Oat Whole Grains
2.7. Principal Component Analysis Results of Silicon and Sulfur Treatments on Macro- and Microelement Contents of Spring Oat Grains
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Soil Characteristics of the Experimental Site
4.2. Climatic Conditions and the Calculation of the Pálfai Drought Index (PaDi)
- = base-value of drought index (°C 100 mm−1);
- = monthly mean temperature from April to August (°C);
- = monthly sum of precipitation from October to September (mm);
- = weighting factor (Table 9);
- c = constant value (10 mm).
| Month | wi |
|---|---|
| October | 0.1 |
| November–December | 0.4 |
| January–April | 0.5 |
| May | 0.8 |
| June | 1.2 |
| July | 1.6 |
| August | 0.9 |
| September | 0.1 |
- n = reduction factor; value is 3.0 on the plain area, 5.0 on hilly or higher territories;
- = average multi-annual precipitation sum for period October-September (mm);
- = average precipitation sum for period October-September for previous three years (mm):
- = monthly precipitation sum (mm).
4.3. Experimental Design and Treatment
- •
- Seed dressing: tebuconazole;
- •
- Pest control: lambda-cihalotrin 0.15 L ha−1 against cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus) at end of tillering (BBCH29), and at end of flowering (BBCH69).
- Control, without fertilization;
- Silicon fertilization (Si) 0.5 L ha−1;
- Sulphur fertilization (S) 5.0 L ha−1;
- Silicon + Sulphur fertilization (Si + S) 0.5 + 5.0 L ha−1.
- •
- S: Jello Fluid (Kwizda Agro, Budapest, Hungary): liquid foliar fertilizer with high content S (lignosulfonate formulation) 1000 g L−1 SO3, 30 g L−1 N, 30 g L−1 MgO, 27 g L−1 B, 0.003 g L−1 Mo;
- •
- Si: Optysil (Intermag, Olkusz, Poland) with high content of Si: (200 g SiO2 L−1).
4.4. Analytical Method of Grain Element Content
4.5. Data Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Loskutov, I.G.; Khlestkina, E.K. Wheat, Barley, and Oat Breeding for Health Benefit Components in Grain. Plants 2021, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biel, W.; Kazimierska, K.; Bashutska, U. Nutritional Value of Wheat, Triticale, Barley and Oat Grains. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech. 2020, 19, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterna, V.; Zute, S.; Brunava, L. Oat Grain Composition and Its Nutrition Benefice. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2016, 8, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, O.; Mah, E.; Anderson, E.J.; Marwah, R.; Shanmugam, S.; Madamanchi, N.; Sudha, V.; Unnikrishnan, R.; Mohanraj, R.; Krishnaswamy, K.; et al. The Role of Oat Nutrients in the Immune System: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Özcan, M.M.; Bağcı, A.; Uslu, N.; Yilmaz, A.; Özkan, A.; Ghafoor, A. Macro and Micro Element Contents of Several Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotype and Variety Grains. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2017, 36, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoroddu, M.A.; Aaseth, J.; Crisponi, G.; Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M. The Essential Metals for Humans: A Brief Overview. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Peñas, E. Health Benefits of Oat: Current Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 14, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Elia, L. Potassium Intake and Human Health. Nutrients 2024, 16, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciosek, Ż.; Kot, K.; Kosik-Bogacka, D.; Łanocha-Arendarczyk, N.; Rotter, I. The Effects of Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Fluoride, and Lead on Bone Tissue. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzeszczak, K.; Kwiatkowski, S.; Kosik-Bogacka, D. The Role of Fe, Zn, and Cu in Pregnancy. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehri, A. Trace Elements in Human Nutrition (II)—An Update. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, F.H. Update on the Possible Nutritional Importance of Silicon. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, C.R.; Shafaei, A.; Balmer, L.; Lewis, J.R.; Hodgson, J.M.; Millar, A.H.; Blekkenhorst, L.C. Sulfur Compounds: From Plants to Humans and Their Role in Chronic Disease Prevention. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 8616–8638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, A.A.H. Overview of the Vital Roles of Macro Minerals in the Human Body. J. Trace Elem. Miner. 2023, 4, 100076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, E.E.; Webber, H.; Gaiser, T.; Naab, J.B.; Ewert, F. Climate Change Impacts on Crop Yields. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 831–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahra, N.; Iqbal, M.; Yousaf, M.; Akhtar, M.; Ahmad, R.; Iqbal, M.A.; Sarwar, M.B. Impact of Climate Change on Wheat Grain Composition and Quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 2745–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, J.C.; Santos, C.S.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Pintado, M.M.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Preserving the Nutritional Quality of Crop Plants under a Changing Climate: Importance and Strategies. Plant Soil 2019, 443, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melash, A.A.; Bogale, A.A.; Bytyqi, B.; Nyandi, M.S.; Ábrahám, É.B. Nutrient Management: As a Panacea to Improve the Caryopsis Quality and Yield Potential of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) under the Changing Climatic Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1232675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jankowski, K.; Hulanicki, P.S.; Sokólski, M.; Dubis, B. Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Response to Different Systems of Foliar Fertilization. J. Elem. 2016, 21, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bytyqi, B.; Kutasy, E. Leaf Reflectance Characteristics and Yield of Spring Oat Varieties as Influenced by Varietal Divergences and Nutritional Supply. Acta Agrar. Debr. 2023, 1, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutasy, E.; Buday-Bódi, E.; Virág, I.C.; Forgács, F.; Melash, A.A.; Zsombik, L.; Nagy, A.; Csajbók, J. Mitigating the Negative Effect of Drought Stress in Oat (Avena sativa L.) with Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Fertilization. Plants 2021, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helaly, M.N.; El-Hoseiny, H.; El-Sheery, N.I.; Rastogi, A.; Kalaji, H.M. Regulation and Physiological Role of Silicon in Alleviating Drought Stress of Mango. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, A.; Kadioglu, Y.K.; Pilbeam, D.J.; Inal, A.; Coban, S.; Aksu, A. Influence of Silicon on Sunflower Cultivars under Drought Stress, II: Essential and Nonessential Element Uptake Determined by Polarized Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2008, 39, 1904–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, H.; Chen, K. The Regulatory Role of Silicon on Water Relations, Photosynthetic Gas Exchange, and Carboxylation Activities of Wheat Leaves in Field Drought Conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 1589–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emam, M.M.; Khattab, H.E.; Helal, N.M.; Deraz, A.E. Effect of Selenium and Silicon on Yield Quality of Rice Plant Grown under Drought Stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 596–605. [Google Scholar]
- Zenda, T.; Liu, S.; Dong, A.; Duan, H. Revisiting Sulfur—The Once Neglected Nutrient: Its Roles in Plant Growth, Metabolism, Stress Tolerance and Crop Production. Agriculture 2021, 11, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Z.; Chang, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Ma, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, G. Effects of Sulfur Fertilization and Short-Term High Temperature on Wheat Grain Production and Wheat Flour Proteins. Crop J. 2018, 6, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palfai, I.; Herceg, A. Palfai Drought Index (PaDI)—Expansion of Applicability of Hungarian PAI for Southeast Europe (SEE) Region; Lower-Tisza District Water Directorate, Szeged—Hungary, 2012, Drought Management Centre for South-East Europe (DMCSEE)–Summary of the result of the project; Slovenian Environmental Agency: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Leszczyńska, D.; Wirkijowska, A.; Gasiński, A.; Średnicka-Tober, D.; Trafiałek, J.; Kazimierczak, R. Oat and Oat Processed Products—Technology, Composition, Nutritional Value, and Health. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Mariem, S.; Soba, D.; Zhou, B.; Loladze, I.; Morales, F.; Aranjuelo, I. Climate Change, Crop Yields, and Grain Quality of C3 Cereals: A Meta-Analysis of [CO2], Temperature, and Drought Effects. Plants 2021, 10, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Högy, P.; Poll, C.; Marhan, S.; Kandeler, E.; Fangmeier, A. Impacts of Temperature Increase and Change in Precipitation Pattern on Crop Yield and Yield Quality of Barley. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1470–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakala, K.; Jauhiainen, L.; Rajala, A.A.; Jalli, M.; Kujala, M.; Laine, A. Different Responses to Weather Events May Change the Cultivation Balance of Spring Barley and Oats in the Future. Field Crops Res. 2020, 259, 107956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, H.W. Sulphur in crop production—Invited paper. Eur. J. Agron. 2001, 14, 81–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmood, M.Z.; Afzal, O.; Ahmed, M.; Qadir, G.; Kheir, A.M.; Aslam, M.A.; Din, A.M.U.; Khan, I.; Hassan, M.J.; Meraj, T.A.; et al. Can sulphur improve the nutrient uptake, partitioning, and seed yield of sesame? Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barczak, B.; Knapowski, T.; Kozera, W.; Ralcewicz, M. Effects of Sulfur Fertilization on the Content and Uptake of Macroelements in Narrow-Leaf Lupin. Rom. Agric. Res. 2014, 31, 245–251. [Google Scholar]
- Kutasy, E.; Diósi, G.; Buday-Bódi, E.; Nagy, P.T.; Melash, A.A.; Forgács, F.Z.; Virág, I.C.; Vad, A.M.; Bytyqi, B.; Buday, T.; et al. Changes in Plant and Grain Quality of Winter Oat (Avena sativa L.) Varieties in Response to Silicon and Sulfur Foliar Fertilisation under Abiotic Stress Conditions. Plants 2023, 12, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barczak, B.; Klikocka, H.; Kozera, W.; Knapowski, T. Assessment of the Effect of Sulfur Fertilisation on Oat Grain Yield and Micronutrient Uptake. J. Elem. 2018, 23, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodowska, M.; Kaczor, A. The Effect of Various Forms of Sulfur and Nitrogen on Calcium and Magnesium Content and Uptake in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). J. Elem. 2012, 14, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greger, M.; Landberg, T.; Vaculík, M. Silicon influences soil availability and accumulation of mineral nutrients in various plant species. Plants 2018, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaller, J.; Scherwietes, E.; Gerber, L.; Vaidya, S.; Kaczorek, D.; Pausch, J.; Barkusky, D.; Sommer, M.; Hoffmann, M. Silica fertilization improved wheat performance and increased phosphorus concentrations during drought at the field scale. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walsh, O.; Shafian, S.; McClintick-Chess, J.; Belmont, K.; Blanscet, S. Potential of Silicon Amendment for Improved Wheat Production. Plants 2018, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helal, N.M.; Khattab, H.I.; Emam, M.M.; Niedbała, G.; Wojciechowski, T.; Hammami, I.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Darwish, D.B.E.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Hassan, H.M. Improving Yield Components and Desirable Eating Quality of Two Wheat Genotypes Using Si and NanoSi Particles under Heat Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torbica, A.; Belović, M.; Popović, L.; Čakarević, J.; Jovičić, M.; Pavličević, J. Comparative Study of Nutritional and Technological Quality Aspects of Minor Cereals. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artyszak, A. Effect of Silicon Fertilization on Crop Yield Quantity and Quality—A Literature Review in Europe. Plants 2018, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Huang, X.; Zhang, A.; Liu, M. Impacts of Silicon on Biogeochemical Cycles of Carbon and Nutrients in Croplands. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 2182–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, D.M. Composition and Nutritional Characteristics of Oat Grain and Products. In Oat Science and Technology; Marshall, H.G., Sorrells, M.E., Eds.; Agronomy Monograph; American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1992; Volume 33, pp. 265–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yli-Halla, M.; Palko, J. Mineral Element Content of Oats (Avena sativa L.) in an Acid Sulphate Soil Area of Tupos Village, Northern Finland. Agric. Food Sci. 1987, 59, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mut, Z.; Erbaș Köse, Ö.D.; Akay, H. Variation in Grain Mineral Contents of Oat Genotypes Grown at Six Locations. Gesunde Pflanz. 2022, 74, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakobsone, I.; Zute, S.; Bleidere, M.; Kantane, I.; Ece, L.; Bartkevics, V. Macro and Trace Elements in Oat Cultivars Bred in Latvia. Zemdirb.-Agric. 2019, 106, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruja, A.; Cozma, A.; Cozma, B.; Horablaga, N.M.; Dinulescu, C.; Alexa, E.; Buzna, C.; Cocan, I.; Berbecea, A.; Dossa, S.; et al. Nutritional, Phytochemical, and Rheological Profiles of Different Oat Varieties and Their Potential in the Flour Industry. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, E. Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999, 50, 641–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, 4th ed.; International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS): Vienna, Austria, 2022; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
- MSZ EN 15510:2017; Takarmány; Mintavételi és Elemzési Módszerek. A Kalcium-, Nátrium-, FOSZFOR-, magnézium-, Kálium-, VAS-, cink-, Réz-, Mangán-, Kobalt-, Molibdén- és Ólomtartalom Meghatározása ICP-AES-sel. (Animal FEEDING stuffs: Methods of Sampling and Analysis—Determination of CALCIUM, Sodium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, potassium, Iron, Zinc, Copper, Manganese, COBALT, molybdenum and Lead by ICP-AES). Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 2017. (In Hungarian)
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 30 September 2025).











| Year | P36 month mm | Monthly Average P for Previous 36 Month mm | Sum of Precipitation April–August mm | mm | PaDI0 °C 100 mm−1 | PaDI °C 100 mm−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1519.7 | 42.2 | 160.9 | 10.5 | 8.75 | 11.6 |
| 2023 | 1567.3 | 43.5 | 359.8 | 35.9 | 3.76 | 4.3 |
| 2024 | 1761.7 | 48.9 | 282.2 | 17.0 | 5.19 | 6.5 |
| PaDI °C 100 mm−1 | Classification |
|---|---|
| <4 | droughtless year |
| 4–6 | mild drought |
| 6–8 | moderate drought |
| 8–10 | medium drought |
| 10–15 | serious drought |
| 15–30 | very serious drought |
| >30 | extreme drought |
| Variety | Macroelements (mg kg−1) | Microelements (mg kg−1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | P | S | Mg | Ca | Na | Si | Fe | Mn | Cu | |
| GK Kormorán | 4976 | 4885 | 1930 | 1618 | 1064 | 121 | 69.7 | 61.4 | 59.3 | 10.4 |
| GK Pillangó | 4903 | 5156 | 1833 | 1546 | 1007 | 128 | 63.7 | 55.5 | 53.1 | 8.7 |
| Lota | 4773 | 5436 | 1920 | 1607 | 1097 | 128 | 68.2 | 58.5 | 54.5 | 10 |
| Panni | 4995 | 5610 | 1918 | 1566 | 1020 | 121 | 81.5 | 54.7 | 52.7 | 10.5 |
| Mv Kengyel | 5022 | 5098 | 1789 | 1550 | 1015 | 116 | 65.2 | 53 | 53.3 | 9.1 |
| Mv Ménes | 4931 | 4925 | 1804 | 1593 | 1127 | 142 | 68.5 | 53.4 | 54 | 10.7 |
| Mv Pehely | 5425 | 5710 | 2053 | 1662 | 994 | 141 | 55 | 57 | 51.8 | 11.1 |
| Mv Szellő | 4912 | 5493 | 1915 | 1544 | 1022 | 136 | 72.2 | 56 | 51.7 | 10.7 |
| LSD0.05 | 43 | 21.7 | 18 | 17.5 | 15.8 | 4.8 | 1.99 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.18 |
| Treatment | Macroelements (mg kg−1) | Microelements (mg kg−1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | P | S | Mg | Ca | Na | Si | Fe | Mn | Cu | |
| Control | 4780 | 4859 | 1768 | 1493 | 924 | 107 | 47.3 | 50.5 | 48.4 | 7.3 |
| Si | 4841 | 5075 | 1802 | 1559 | 958 | 124 | 80 | 53.7 | 50.8 | 9.2 |
| S | 5250 | 5623 | 2032 | 1640 | 1179 | 146 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 58.9 | 12.3 |
| Si + S | 5098 | 5600 | 1979 | 1651 | 1113 | 139 | 83.3 | 59.1 | 57.1 | 11.8 |
| LSD0.05 | 32.4 | 20.4 | 14.8 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 2.7 | 1.26 | 0.7 | 0.47 | 0.13 |
| Year | Macroelements (mg kg−1) | Microelements (mg kg−1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | P | S | Mg | Ca | Na | Si | Fe | Mn | Cu | |
| 2022 | 7153 | 4913 | 2077 | 1608 | 930 | 110 | 55.4 | 56.1 | 55.2 | 9.3 |
| 2023 | 4869 | 6501 | 1862 | 1580 | 1110 | 137 | 76.1 | 59.9 | 50.5 | 13.6 |
| 2024 | 2954 | 4453 | 1746 | 1569 | 1090 | 140 | 72.6 | 52.6 | 55.6 | 7.5 |
| LSD0.05 | 25.7 | 15.3 | 11.6 | 9.8 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 0.99 | 0.51 | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| Element | df | F | p | Partial η 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si | 42 | 33.66 | 0.000 | 0.88 |
| P | 42 | 29.57 | 0.000 | 0.87 |
| Cu | 42 | 28.70 | 0.000 | 0.86 |
| Ca | 42 | 26.38 | 0.000 | 0.85 |
| K | 42 | 17.40 | 0.000 | 0.79 |
| S | 42 | 8.25 | 0.000 | 0.64 |
| Mn | 42 | 7.29 | 0.000 | 0.61 |
| Na | 42 | 5.97 | 0.000 | 0.57 |
| Mg | 42 | 5.65 | 0.000 | 0.55 |
| Fe | 42 | 3.91 | 0.000 | 0.46 |
| Treatment | P03–07 | PaDI | Ca | Cu | Fe | K | Mg | Mn | Na | P | S | Si | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.497 ** | 0.500 ** | 0.542 ** | 0.086 | 0.578 ** | 0.596 ** | 0.483 ** | 0.288 ** | 0.437 ** | 0.368 ** |
| P03–07 | 0.000 | 1 | −0.999 ** | 0.442 ** | 0.380 ** | 0.152 * | −0.663 ** | −0.121 * | −0.257 ** | 0.440 ** | 0.497 ** | −0.475 ** | 0.328 ** |
| PaDI | 0.000 | −0.999 ** | 1 | −0.447 ** | −0.352 ** | −0.132 * | 0.696 ** | 0.125 * | 0.245 ** | −0.450 ** | −0.465 ** | 0.494 ** | −0.330 ** |
| Ca | 0.497 ** | 0.442 ** | −0.447 ** | 1 | 0.411 ** | 0.464 ** | −0.281 ** | 0.463 ** | 0.415 ** | 0.684 ** | 0.363 ** | 0.166 ** | 0.234 ** |
| Cu | 0.500 ** | 0.380 ** | −0.352 ** | 0.411 ** | 1 | 0.678 ** | 0.191 ** | 0.396 ** | 0.191 ** | 0.344 ** | 0.796 ** | 0.437 ** | 0.338 ** |
| Fe | 0.542 ** | 0.152 * | −0.132 * | 0.464 ** | 0.678 ** | 1 | 0.275 ** | 0.568 ** | 0.451 ** | 0.385 ** | 0.517 ** | 0.561 ** | 0.178 ** |
| K | 0.086 | −0.663 ** | 0.696 ** | −0.281 ** | 0.191 ** | 0.275 ** | 1 | 0.268 ** | 0.070 | −0.342 ** | 0.168 ** | 0.687 ** | −0.266 ** |
| Mg | 0.578 ** | −0.121 * | 0.125 * | 0.463 ** | 0.396 ** | 0.568 ** | 0.268 ** | 1 | 0.548 ** | 0.446 ** | 0.255 ** | 0.629 ** | 0.146 * |
| Mn | 0.596 ** | −0.257 ** | 0.245 ** | 0.415 ** | 0.191 ** | 0.451 ** | 0.070 | 0.548 ** | 1 | 0.241 ** | −0.093 | 0.435 ** | 0.198 ** |
| Na | 0.483 ** | 0.440 ** | −0.450 ** | 0.684 ** | 0.344 ** | 0.385 ** | −0.342 ** | 0.446 ** | 0.241 ** | 1 | 0.214 ** | 0.022 | 0.223 ** |
| P | 0.288 ** | 0.497 ** | −0.465 ** | 0.363 ** | 0.796 ** | 0.517 ** | 0.168 ** | 0.255 ** | −0.093 | 0.214 ** | 1 | 0.346 ** | 0.205 ** |
| S | 0.437 ** | −0.475 ** | 0.494 ** | 0.166 ** | 0.437 ** | 0.561 ** | 0.687 ** | 0.629 ** | 0.435 ** | 0.022 | 0.346 ** | 1 | −0.021 |
| Si | 0.368 ** | 0.328 ** | −0.330 ** | 0.234 ** | 0.338 ** | 0.178 ** | −0.266 ** | 0.146 * | 0.198 ** | 0.223 ** | 0.205 ** | −0.021 | 1 |
| Soil Parameters at the Experimental Station | Soil Profile Layers (cm) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–20 | 20–40 | 40–60 | 60–80 | 80–100 | 100–120 | 120–140 | 140–160 | 160–180 | 180–200 | |
| pH (KCl) | 6.93 | 7.46 | 7.51 | 7.56 | 7.55 | 7.59 | 7.60 | 7.73 | 7.74 | 7.76 |
| KA | 45 | 52 | 52 | 53 | 53 | 56 | 54 | 51 | 50 | 49 |
| Soluble Salts (%) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| CaCO3% | 0.52 | 1.45 | 1.97 | 2.07 | 1.86 | 2.48 | 2.80 | 2.90 | 3.00 | 3.11 |
| Humus (%) | 2.89 | 2.87 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.37 | 2.55 | 1.22 | 0.741 | 0.445 | 0.407 |
| P2O5 (AL) (mg kg−1) | 1538 | 1149 | 1020 | 390 | 321 | 954 | 229 | 161 | 105 | 97.5 |
| K2O (AL) (mg kg−1) | 638 | 586 | 366 | 315 | 103 | 421 | 146 | 97.8 | 92.1 | 87.5 |
| NO3¯ (KCl) (mg kg−1) | 82.2 | 53.4 | 48.5 | 36.5 | 31.6 | 144 | 98.8 | 82.5 | 66.5 | 54.6 |
| Na (Al) (mg kg−1) | 73.7 | 68.6 | 66.9 | 52.1 | 50.4 | 107 | 99.3 | 91.3 | 87.7 | 86.3 |
| Mg (KCl) (mg kg−1) | 552 | 463 | 352 | 324 | 269 | 584 | 694 | 664 | 540 | 450 |
| S (KCl) (mg kg−1) | 14.1 | 7.31 | 3.69 | 3.38 | 2.43 | 4.60 | 47.8 | 39.6 | 36.4 | 32.6 |
| Mn (EDTA) (mg kg−1) | 25.4 | 25.2 | 21.7 | 15.6 | 13.2 | 17.6 | 15.4 | 10.2 | 9.36 | 7.96 |
| Zn (EDTA) (mg kg−1) | 2.77 | 2.24 | 1.84 | 1.36 | 1.21 | 2.19 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 0.851 | 0.726 |
| Cu (EDTA) (mg kg−1) | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.03 | 0.967 | 0.952 | 1.09 | 0.555 | 0.533 | 0.345 | 0.297 |
| Soluble Si (mg kg−1) | 35.8 | 28.0 | 23.0 | 6.65 | 5.66 | 14.8 | 3.96 | 3.18 | 3.74 | 3.09 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bytyqi, B.; Forgács, F.Z.; Melash, A.A.; Virág, I.C.; Csajbók, J.; Appiah, E.A.; Kutasy, E.T. Foliar Application of Silicon and Sulfur Modifies Grain Mineral Composition of Spring Oats ( Avena sativa L.) Under Contrasting Seasonal Drought Conditions. Plants 2026, 15, 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020316
Bytyqi B, Forgács FZ, Melash AA, Virág IC, Csajbók J, Appiah EA, Kutasy ET. Foliar Application of Silicon and Sulfur Modifies Grain Mineral Composition of Spring Oats ( Avena sativa L.) Under Contrasting Seasonal Drought Conditions. Plants. 2026; 15(2):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020316
Chicago/Turabian StyleBytyqi, Bekir, Fanni Zsuzsa Forgács, Anteneh Agezew Melash, István Csaba Virág, József Csajbók, Ebenezer Ayew Appiah, and Erika Tünde Kutasy. 2026. "Foliar Application of Silicon and Sulfur Modifies Grain Mineral Composition of Spring Oats ( Avena sativa L.) Under Contrasting Seasonal Drought Conditions" Plants 15, no. 2: 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020316
APA StyleBytyqi, B., Forgács, F. Z., Melash, A. A., Virág, I. C., Csajbók, J., Appiah, E. A., & Kutasy, E. T. (2026). Foliar Application of Silicon and Sulfur Modifies Grain Mineral Composition of Spring Oats ( Avena sativa L.) Under Contrasting Seasonal Drought Conditions. Plants, 15(2), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020316

