Optimization of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Optimization of PGR Combinations for Somatic Embryo Differentiation
2.2. Effect of Basal Media on Somatic Embryo Differentiation
2.3. Orthogonal Optimization of PGRs, Nitrogen Source, and Carbon Source
2.4. Shoot Germination and Rooting
2.5. Cytological Characterization of Embryogenic and Non-Embryogenic Callus
2.6. Histological Tracking of Somatic Embryo Development
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Culture Conditions
4.2. Effect of Plant Growth Regulator Combinations
4.3. Effect of Basal Media
4.4. Orthogonal Optimization of PGRs, Nitrogen Source, and Carbon Source
4.5. Somatic Embryo Germination and Rooting
4.6. Cytological Observation
4.7. Statistical Analysis
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, C.L.; Zhang, H.J. Sustainable Development of Areca Palm Planting Industry in Hainan under Negative Public Opinion. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2024, 44, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.Y.; Zhu, H.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhou, H.Q.; Liu, F. Current Situation and Development Suggestions of Areca Nut Seedling Industry in Hainan. China Trop. Agric. 2024, 1, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, D.Y.; Qiu, S.H.; Lin, Z.Q.; Liu, D. Cost-benefit Analysis and Industrial Development Suggestions for Areca Palm Planting in Hainan Province. Trop. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2025, 48, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
- Fehér, A. Callus, dedifferentiation, totipotency, somatic embryogenesis: What these terms mean in the era of molecular plant biology? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fehér, A.; Pasternak, T.P.; Dudits, D. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 74, 201–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Rojas-Herrera, R.; Galaz-Avalos, R.M.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006, 86, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Shen, L.S.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y. Establishment of Somatic Embryogenesis and Genetic Transformation System for Pinus koraiensis. For. Eng. 2026, 42, 452–462. [Google Scholar]
- Steward, F.C.; Mapes, M.O.; Smith, J. Growth and organized development of cultured cells. I. Growth and division of freely suspended cells. Am. J. Bot. 1958, 45, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ree, J.F.; Guerra, M.P. Palm (Arecaceae) somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015, 51, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kordrostami, M.; Mafakheri, M.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) genetic improvement via biotechnological approaches. Tree Genet. Genomes 2022, 18, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaligot, E.; Rival, A.; Beulé, T.; Dussert, S.; Verdeil, J.L. Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): The DNA methylation hypothesis. Plant Cell Rep. 2000, 19, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandoval-Cancino, G.; Saenz, L.; Chan, L.J.; Oropeza, C. Improved formation of embryogenic callus from coconut immature inflorescence explants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016, 52, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solangi, N.; Jatoi, M.A.; Abul-Soad, A.A.; Mirani, A.A.; Solangi, M.A.; Markhand, G.S. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of date palm using immature floral buds. Sarhad J. Agric. 2023, 39, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karun, A.; Sajini, K.K.; Nirmal Babu, K. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from zygotic embryo-derived callus of Areca catechu L. (Arecaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2002, 38, 203–207. [Google Scholar]
- Karun, A.; Siril, E.A.; Radha, E.; Parthasarathy, V.A. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaf and inflorescence explants of arecanut (Areca catechu L.). Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 1623–1628. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.C.; Chen, J.T.; Chang, W.C. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf, root and stem-derived callus of Areca catechu L. J. Trop. Crops 2024, 22, 4733–4746. [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez, V.M. Involvement of plant hormones and plant growth regulators on in vitro somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 47, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaj, M.D. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis induction and plant regeneration with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 43, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, Q.T.; Bandupriya, H.D.D.; Lopez-Villalobos, A.; Sisunandar, S.; Foale, M.; Adkins, S.W. Tissue culture and associated biotechnological interventions for the improvement of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): A review. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016, 52, 377–389. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez Gonzalez, D.; López Torres, J.; Rayas, A.; Montano Pérez, N.; Santos Pino, A.; Basail Pérez, M.; Alvarez, R.; Beovides García, Y.; Medero Vega, V. Somatic embryogenesis in the plantain cultivar ‘FHIA-25’ (AAB) from meristematic apices. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2015, 17, 457–466. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, Y.; Guo, S.L.; Chen, S.H.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Callus Induction, Proliferation and Histocytological Observation of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). J. Yantai Univ. (Nat. Sci. Eng. Ed.) 2024, 37, 482–489. [Google Scholar]
- Horstman, A.; Bemer, M.; Boutilier, K. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis. Regeneration 2017, 4, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Britto, D.T.; Kronzucker, H.J. NH4+ toxicity in higher plants: A critical review. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 159, 567–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipavská, H.; Konrádová, H. Somatic embryogenesis in conifers: The role of carbohydrate metabolism. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2004, 40, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishnan, M.; Ceasar, S.A.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Ignacimuthu, S. Efficacious somatic embryogenesis and fertile plant recovery from shoot apex explants of onion (Allium cepa L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.S.; Zhao, J.; Yang, X.Q.; Zou, J.X.; Li, D.D. Molecular mechanism of the effect of PEG and UV stress on the metabolism of arecoline in Areca catechu callus. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321, 112299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Treatment | PGR Combination (mg/L) | Induction Rate (%) | Browning Mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Control) | 2,4-D 2.0 + Kin 0.5 | 7.76 ± 2.87 | 3.10 ± 1.10 |
| 2 | 6-BA 2.0 + 2ip 0.5 + NAA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 | 12.27 ± 2.64 | 7.14 ± 0.75 |
| 3 | TDZ 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | 11.76 ± 2.78 | 8.47 ± 1.50 |
| 4 | 6-BA 2.0 + 2ip 0.5 + NAA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 + KN 0.5 + NOA 0.5 | 17.16 ± 3.03 | 9.73 ± 1.40 |
| 5 | 2ip 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | 21.07 ± 3.60 | 19.67 ± 2.57 |
| 6 | 2ip 1.0 + IAA 0.5 | 15.53 ± 4.61 | 24.57 ± 4.48 |
| 7 | 6-BA 2.0 + Pic 1.0 | 16.79 ± 6.22 | 25.33 ± 5.57 |
| 8 | TDZ 1.0 + 6-BA 2.0 | 27.40 ± 3.60 | 9.53 ± 1.61 |
| 9 | 6-BA 2.0 + 2,4-D 1.0 | 16.07 ± 7.11 | 22.46 ± 1.41 |
| Treatment | Basal Medium | Induction Rate (%) | Browning Mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/2 MS | 3.71 ± 0.57 | 17.33 ± 5.25 |
| 2 | Y3 | 11.33 ± 1.15 | 9.52 ± 2.93 |
| 3 | MS | 7.52 ± 1.83 | 23.61 ± 4.59 |
| 4 | WPM | 12.57 ± 5.16 | 16.38 ± 3.31 |
| 5 | White | 2.38 ± 0.59 | 14.85 ± 2.34 |
| 6 | B5 | 8.09 ± 2.14 | 21.99 ± 3.86 |
| Treatment | PGR Combination (mg/L) | Basal Medium | Sucrose (g/L) | Induction Rate (%) | Browning Mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2ip 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | Y3 | 20 | 14.63 ± 0.86 | 16.08 ± 0.61 |
| 2 | 2ip 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | WPM | 10 | 17.31 ± 0.61 | 20.27 ± 1.24 |
| 3 | 2ip 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | WPM | 30 | 24.53 ± 1.81 | 18.09 ± 1.19 |
| 4 | 2ip 1.0 + NAA 0.5 | B5 | 40 | 19.32 ± 0.65 | 22.37 ± 0.91 |
| 5 | 6-BA 2.0 + TDZ 1.0 | B5 | 10 | 8.57 ± 0.77 | 23.66 ± 1.28 |
| 6 | 6-BA 2.0 + TDZ 1.0 | B5 | 20 | 15.78 ± 1.06 | 13.79 ± 0.90 |
| 7 | 6-BA 2.0 + TDZ 1.0 | Y3 | 30 | 48.62 ± 4.83 | 13.61 ± 0.71 |
| 8 | 6-BA 2.0 + TDZ 1.0 | WPM | 40 | 30.67 ± 2.30 | 10.85 ± 0.85 |
| 9 | 6-BA 2.0 + NAA 0.5 + NOA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 + 2ip 0.5 + KN 0.5 | Y3 | 10 | 9.00 ± 1.00 | 17.86 ± 0.79 |
| 10 | 6-BA 2.0 + NAA 0.5 + NOA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 + 2ip 0.5 + KN 0.5 | Y3 | 40 | 23.33 ± 0.57 | 21.19 ± 0.73 |
| 11 | 6-BA 2.0 + NAA 0.5 + NOA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 + 2ip 0.5 + KN 0.5 | B5 | 30 | 26.00 ± 5.97 | 19.90 ± 1.19 |
| 12 | 6-BA 2.0 + NAA 0.5 + NOA 0.5 + IAA 0.5 + 2ip 0.5 + KN 0.5 | WPM | 20 | 23.34 ± 3.93 | 23.52 ± 1.40 |
| No | 6-BA (mg/L) | Budding Rate (%) | Mortality Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 28.33 ± 0.13 | 23.33 ± 0.19 |
| 2 | 1 | 47.46 ± 0.13 | 17.67 ± 0.07 |
| 3 | 2 | 65.63 ± 0.14 | 9.33 ± 0.08 |
| 4 | 3 | 61.69 ± 0.06 | 23.00 ± 0.05 |
| 5 | 4 | 55.53 ± 0.12 | 26.33 ± 0.08 |
| Type | Cell Length (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | |
| Embryonic | 0.07896 | 0.08143 | 0.08945 | 0.06684 | 0.06405 | 0.07615 |
| Non-Embryonic | 0.12889 | 0.11880 | 0.11474 | 0.11997 | 0.11836 | 0.12015 |
| Type | Cell width (mm) | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | |
| Embryonic | 0.04577 | 0.04828 | 0.05590 | 0.05186 | 0.05326 | 0.05101 |
| Non-Embryonic | 0.07674 | 0.07094 | 0.09464 | 0.07939 | 0.07938 | 0.08022 |
| Type | Cell area (mm2) | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | |
| Embryonic | 0.00291 | 0.00278 | 0.00340 | 0.00298 | 0.00307 | 0.00303 |
| Non-Embryonic | 0.00749 | 0.00800 | 0.00830 | 0.00748 | 0.00802 | 0.00786 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhang, Q.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Ouyang, C.; Zou, J.; Li, D. Optimization of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.). Plants 2026, 15, 2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15142151
Zhang Q, Li Q, Li Y, Ouyang C, Zou J, Li D. Optimization of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.). Plants. 2026; 15(14):2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15142151
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Qikai, Qiongxiang Li, Yu Li, Chao Ouyang, Jixin Zou, and Dongdong Li. 2026. "Optimization of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.)" Plants 15, no. 14: 2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15142151
APA StyleZhang, Q., Li, Q., Li, Y., Ouyang, C., Zou, J., & Li, D. (2026). Optimization of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.). Plants, 15(14), 2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15142151

