Isotopic Nitrogen and Carbon Allocation Among Soybean Plant Parts Under Impact of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Effects of Treatment on Nitrogen Stable Isotope Ratio and N Content in Different Plant Parts at Flowering and Full-Maturity Stages
2.1.1. Effects of Variety and Amendment on Nitrogen Isotopic Signatures at Flowering and Full-Maturity Stages
2.1.2. Accumulated Nitrogen and Effects of Variety and Amendment on N Content
2.2. Variation in Carbon Among Soybean Varieties
2.3. Productivity Parameters of Inoculated and Non-Inoculated Soybeans
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Site and Experimental Design
4.2. Weather Conditions
4.3. Stable Isotope Analysis
4.4. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mishra, R.; Tripathi, M.; Sikarwar, R.; Singh, Y.; Tripathi, N. Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill): A multipurpose legume shaping our world. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2024, 25, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerzak, M.A. The Impact of the European Green Deal Strategy on Security in the Supply of Native Plant Protein for Animal Feed in Poland. Ann. Ann. PAAAE 2021, XXIII, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toleikiene, M.; Slepetys, J.; Sarunaite, L.; Lazauskas, S.; Deveikyte, I.; Kadziuliene, Z. Soybean development and productivity in response to organic management above the northern boundary of soybean distribution in Europe. Agronomy 2021, 11, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, M.; Pham, T.H.; Nieuwenhuis, A.; Ali, W.; Zaeem, M.; Ashiq, W.; Gillani, S.S.M.; Manful, C.; Adigun, O.A.; Galagedara, L. Adaptation strategies of forage soybeans cultivated on acidic soils under cool climate to produce high quality forage. Plant Sci. 2019, 283, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, L.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Peng, H.; Shan, J. Modeling the current land suitability and future dynamics of global soybean cultivation under climate change scenarios. Field Crops Res. 2021, 263, 108069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skipitytė, R.; Barisevičiūtė, R.; Toleikienė, M. Impact of microbial strain on the nitrogen fixation of soybean varieties of different maturity under cool climate conditions of Northern Europe. Plants 2025, 14, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kebede, E. Contribution, utilization, and improvement of legumes-driven biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 767998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivares, J.; Bedmar, E.J.; Sanjuán, J. Biological nitrogen fixation in the context of global change. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, L.; Ma, S.; Chen, G.; Lu, X.; Chai, Q.; Li, S. Mechanisms and mitigation strategies for the occurrence of continuous cropping obstacles of legumes in China. Agronomy 2023, 14, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beruk, H.; Yoseph, T.; Ayalew, T. Unlocking the potential of inoculation with Bradyrhizobium for enhanced growth and symbiotic responses in soybean varieties under controlled conditions. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarecki, W.; Borza, I.M.; Rosan, C.A.; Vicas, S.I.; Domuța, C.G. Soybean response to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and/or nitrogen fertilization. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirriam, A.; Mugwe, J.; Nasar, J.; Kisaka, O.; Ranjan, S.; Gitari, H. Role of phosphorus and inoculation with Bradyrhizobium in enhancing soybean production. Adv. Agric. 2023, 2023, 3231623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, J.T.; Rasmussen, J.; Eriksen, J.; Arf, O.; De Notaris, C.; Moretti, L.G. Biological N fixation activity in soybean can be estimated based on nodule dry weight and is increased by additional inoculation. Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, T.; Pant, L.M.; Angaw, T. Effects of inoculation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) varieties on nitisols of Bako, Western Ethiopia. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012, 2012, 261475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Zimmer, S.; Messmer, M.; Haase, T.; Piepho, H.-P.; Mindermann, A.; Schulz, H.; Habekuß, A.; Ordon, F.; Wilbois, K.-P.; Heß, J. Effects of soybean variety and Bradyrhizobium strains on yield, protein content and biological nitrogen fixation under cool growing conditions in Germany. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 72, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzieri, M.; Marchettini, N.; Hallam, T. Importance of the Bradhyrizobium japonicum symbiosis for the sustainability of a soybean cultivation. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W. Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes: Genetic Mechanisms and Agricultural Applications. Field Crop 2024, 7, 58–69. [Google Scholar]
- Steele, K.; Bonish, P.; Daniel, R.M.; O’hara, G. Effect of rhizobial strain and host plant on nitrogen isotopic fractionation in legumes. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 1001–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoneyama, T.; Fujita, K.; Yoshida, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Kambayashi, I.; Yazaki, J. Variation in natural abundance of 15N among plant parts and in 15N/14N fractionation during N2 fixation in the legume-rhizobia symbiotic system. Plant Cell Physiol. 1986, 27, 791–799. [Google Scholar]
- Hubick, K.; Farquhar, G. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 503–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalcsits, L.A.; Buschhaus, H.A.; Guy, R.D. Nitrogen isotope discrimination as an integrated measure of nitrogen fluxes, assimilation and allocation in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 151, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hartmann, H.; Trumbore, S. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees–from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 386–403. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hartmann, H.; Bahn, M.; Carbone, M.; Richardson, A.D. Plant carbon allocation in a changing world–challenges and progress. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Stitt, M.; Schulze, E.D. Plant growth, storage, and resource allocation: From flux control in a metabolic chain to the whole plant level. In Flux Control in Biological Systems: From Enzymes to Populations and Ecosystems; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1994; pp. 57–118. [Google Scholar]
- Pillay, T.; Ngcobo, S.; Ward, D. Nutrient addition, fire and grass competition affects biological nitrogen fixation in Vachellia sieberiana, and associated soil respiration. Pedobiologia 2023, 96, 150848. [Google Scholar]
- Kleinert, A.; Venter, M.; Kossmann, J.; Valentine, A. The reallocation of carbon in P deficient lupins affects biological nitrogen fixation. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friel, C.A.; Friesen, M.L. Legumes modulate allocation to rhizobial nitrogen fixation in response to factorial light and nitrogen manipulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serraj, R. Effects of drought stress on legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation: Physiological mechanisms. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 41, 1136–1141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, M.-L. Nitrogen Fixation by Pulse Crops and the Use of Nitrogen Isotopic Techniques to Measure the Fixation Capacity. In Soil Nitrogen Uses and Environmental Impacts; Series: Advances in Soil Science; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, R.D. Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, X.; Fan, H.; Zhang, F.; Wang, K.; Ippolito, J.; Li, J.; Jiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Su, J. Soil carbon and nitrogen transformations under soybean as influenced by organic farming. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 1883–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szpak, P.; Longstaffe, F.J.; Millaire, J.-F.; White, C.D. Large variation in nitrogen isotopic composition of a fertilized legume. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 45, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, W.J.; Ryu, J.S.; Mayer, B.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, I. Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Oxygen Isotope Ratios of Animal-and Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Used in South Korea. J. Environ. Qual. 2017, 46, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bateman, A.S.; Kelly, S.D. Fertilizer nitrogen isotope signatures. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2007, 43, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peixoto, L.; Enggrob, K.L.; Martins, J.T.; Rasmussen, J.; De Notaris, C. Grain legumes combined with cover crops secure positive residual N effects in food production systems. Plant Soil 2026, 518, 789–802. [Google Scholar]
- Toleikiene, M.; Skipityte, R.; Bariseviciute, R.; Martins, J.T.; Rasmussen, J. The effects of legume-cereal intercropping on the symbiotically fixed N2 in soybean, N accumulation, and C allocation. Plants 2025, 14, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, R.; Liu, S.; Considine, M.J.; Siddique, K.H.; Lam, H.M.; Chen, Y. Root system architecture, physiological and transcriptional traits of soybean (Glycine max L.) in response to water deficit: A review. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.J.; Younas, R.; Saleem, A.; Khan, M.; Khan, Q.; Ahmed, R. Comprehensive Account of Inoculation and Coinoculation in Soybean. In Nitrogen Fixation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
- de Souza, G.K.; Sampaio, J.; Longoni, L.; Ferreira, S.; Alvarenga, S.; Beneduzi, A. Soybean inoculants in Brazil: An overview of quality control. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Martins, J.T.; Peixoto, L.; Giannini-Kurina, F.; Han, E.; Rasmussen, J. Effect of additional inoculation on in situ biomass, nodule formation and N2 fixation in soybean under Northern European conditions. Plant Soil 2026, 518, 197–210. [Google Scholar]
- Jochum, T.; Fastnacht, A.; Trumbore, S.E.; Popp, J.r.; Frosch, T. Direct Raman spectroscopic measurements of biological nitrogen fixation under natural conditions: An analytical approach for studying nitrogenase activity. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Campos, B.-H.C.d.; Gnatta, V. Inoculant and foliar fertilizer in soybean under no-tillage cultivated in areas with established Bradyrhizobium populations. Rev. Bras. De Ciência Do Solo 2006, 30, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehring, C.; Vlek, P.L. Limitations of the 15N natural abundance method for estimating biological nitrogen fixation in Amazonian forest legumes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2004, 5, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, A.; Moraes, L.; Schroth, G.; Becker, F.; Mandarino, J. Soybean yield and nutritional status response to nitrogen sources and rates of foliar fertilization. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saranga, Y.; Flash, I.; Yakir, D. Variation in water-use efficiency and its relation to carbon isotope ratio in cotton. Crop Sci. 1998, 38, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szpunar-Krok, E.; Bobrecka-Jamro, D.; Pikuła, W.; Jańczak-Pieniążek, M. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum on nodulation and yielding of soybean. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binacchi, F.; Niether, W.; Brock, C.; Knebl, L.; Brændholt, A.; Wolf, B.; Gattinger, A. Demystifying the agronomic and environmental N performance of grain legumes across contrasting soil textures of central Germany. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 356, 108645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Treatment | Nodule Number (Plant−1) | Nodule DW (g Plant−1) | Root | Shoot | Root to Shoot | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ(15N), ‰ | N, % | δ(15N), ‰ | N, % | Δ(15N), ‰ | |||
| M/Control | 1.4 ± 0.7 a | 2.4 ± 0.3 a | 4.0 ± 0.8 b | 2.4 ± 0.4 ab | −2.6 | ||
| M + Fertilizer | 1.3 ± 0.8 a | 2.2 ± 0.2 ab | 2.9 ± 0.6 ab | 2.3 ± 0.4 a | −1.6 | ||
| M + AGF78 | 23.1 ± 8.2 b | 0.10 ± 0.06 a | 1.7 ± 0.8 a | 2.4 ± 0.3 a | 2.8 ± 0.5 ab | 2.8 ± 0.3 ab | −1.1 |
| M + SEMIA5079 | 18.8 ± 7.1 ab | 0.09 ± 0.03 a | 1.3 ± 0.7 a | 2.1 ± 0.1 ab | 2.7 ± 0.6 a | 2.8 ± 0.2 ab | −1.4 |
| M + RF10 | 9.7 ± 9.3 ab | 0.06 ± 0.04 a | 2.3 ± 0.8 a | 1.6 ± 0.2 bc | 4.0 ± 0.5 b | 3.0 ± 0.3 b | −1.7 |
| L/Control | 1.4 ± 0.8 a | 1.7 ± 0.2 bc | 3.0 ± 0.3 ab | 2.4 ± 0.2 ab | −1.6 | ||
| L + Fertilizer | 1.8 ± 1.0 a | 1.2 ± 0.1 c | 2.9 ± 0.6 ab | 2.3 ± 0.2 ab | −1.1 | ||
| L + AGF78 | 13.0 ± 4.6 ab | 0.07 ± 0.03 a | 1.6 ± 0.9 a | 1.6 ± 0.3 bc | 2.7 ± 0.6 a | 2.9 ± 0.4 ab | −1.1 |
| L + SEMIA5079 | 11.2 ± 2.6 ab | 0.07 ± 0.03 a | 1.3 ± 0.6 a | 2.1 ± 0.2 ab | 2.5 ± 0.4 a | 2.8 ± 0.5 ab | −1.2 |
| L + RF10 | 6.2 ± 3.7 a | 0.10 ± 0.05 a | 2.0 ± 0.6 a | 1.3 ± 0.4 c | 3.3 ± 0.6 ab | 2.5 ± 0.4 ab | −1.3 |
| Treatment | Root | Stem and Pod | Root−Stem/Pod | Seed | Root−Seed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ(15N), ‰ | N, % | δ(15N), ‰ | N, % | Δ(15N), ‰ | δ(15N), ‰ | N, % | Δ(15N), ‰ | |
| M/Control | 2.2 ± 1.1 a | 0.6 ± 0.2 ab | 1.5 ± 0.4 ab | 0.5 ± 0.1 ab | −0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.2 abe | 5.0 ± 0.4 a | +0.2 |
| M + Fertilizer | 2.8 ± 0.6 ab | 0.7 ± 0.04 ab | 1.6 ± 0.4 ab | 0.5 ± 0.03 ab | −1.2 | 2.1 ± 0.3 ab | 5.2 ±0.5 a | −0.7 |
| M + AGF78 | 3.5 ± 0.3 abc | 0.6 ± 0.1 ab | 0.8 ± 0.2 cd | 0.6 ± 0.04 ab | −2.7 | 0.8 ± 0.4 cd | 6.6 ± 0.4 bc | −2.7 |
| M + SEMIA5079 | 3.5 ± 0.2 abc | 0.8 ± 0.1 ab | 0.0 ± 0.3 e | 0.6 ± 0.1 ab | −3.5 | 0.7 ± 0.3 c | 6.7 ± 0.4 b | −2.8 |
| M + RF10 | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | 0.7 ± 0.1 ab | 0.9 ± 0.4 acd | 0.6 ± 0.1 ab | −1.8 | 0.8 ± 0.3 cd | 5.7 ± 0.3 acde | −1.9 |
| L/Control | 2.0 ± 0.4 a | 0.5 ± 0.1 a | 1.2 ± 0.2 abc | 0.5 ± 0.04 a | −0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.4 ae | 5.6 ± 0.3 ade | +0.5 |
| L + Fertilizer | 2.6 ± 0.5 a | 0.7 ± 0.2 ab | 1.8 ± 0.3 b | 0.5 ± 0.03 ab | −0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.2 e | 5.4 ± 0.4 ad | +0.4 |
| L + AGF78 | 4.1 ± 0.8 bc | 0.9 ± 0.03 bc | 0.6 ± 0.4 cde | 0.6 ± 0.1 b | −3.5 | 1.1 ± 0.3 cdf | 6.3 ± 0.6 bcde | −3.0 |
| L + SEMIA5079 | 4.4 ± 0.9 c | 1.3 ± 0.4 c | 0.5 ± 0.3 de | 0.6 ± 0.1 ab | −3.9 | 1.4 ± 0.2 df | 6.4 ± 0.4 bce | −3.0 |
| L + RF10 | 3.0 ± 0.3 abc | 0.8 ± 0.1 bc | 0.8 ± 0.2 cde | 0.5 ± 0.1 ab | −2.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 bf | 5.9 ± 0.2 abcde | −1.3 |
| Treatment | kg DW N ha−1 | kg DW C ha−1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | |
| M/Control | 19.7 ± 3.85 ab | 118 ± 16 a | 291 ± 33 a | 2211 ± 219 a |
| M + Fertilizer | 18.0 ± 3.46 abc | 125 ± 50 a | 299 ± 81 a | 2312 ± 797 a |
| M + AGF78 | 23.8 ± 6.05 b | 198 ± 96 a | 384 ± 148 a | 2942 ± 1160 a |
| M + SEMIA5079 | 23.1 ± 5.80 ab | 187 ± 65 a | 344 ± 62 a | 2837 ± 717 a |
| M + RF10 | 17.3 ± 7.14 abc | 210 ± 84 a | 408 ± 117 a | 3013 ± 1187 a |
| L/Control | 15.0 ± 3.57 abc | 211 ± 70 a | 422 ± 126 a | 3180 ± 1302 a |
| L + Fertilizer | 7.21 ± 2.59 c | 145 ± 75 a | 260 ± 94 a | 3255 ± 1144 a |
| L + AGF78 | 12.4 ± 4.00 ac | 154 ± 66 a | 307 ± 37 a | 2396 ± 1098 a |
| L + SEMIA5079 | 15.3 ± 1.66 abc | 183 ± 67 a | 305 ± 56 a | 2817 ± 814 a |
| L + RF10 | 8.16 ± 0.81 c | 136 ± 29 a | 263 ± 58 a | 2452 ± 707 a |
| Treatment | kg DW N ha−1 | kg DW C ha−1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Stem and Pod | Seed | Root | Stem and Pod | Seed | |
| M/Control | 4.94 ± 1.88 a | 18.8 ± 4.70 a | 195.86 ± 46.98 a | 330 ± 65 ab | 1234 ± 864 b | 1944 ± 504 a |
| M + Fertilizer | 6.95 ± 1.46 a | 26.2 ± 5.80 a | 229.49 ± 59.90 a | 335 ± 54 ab | 2125 ± 401 ab | 2215 ± 734 a |
| M + AGF78 | 6.03 ± 1.34 a | 35.8 ± 8.85 a | 486.64 ± 160.11 b | 375 ± 120 a | 2613 ± 655 ab | 3561 ± 1006 a |
| M + SEMIA5079 | 6.10 ± 0.46 a | 28.0 ± 1.98 a | 374.76 ± 50.89 ab | 301 ± 25 ab | 2107 ± 385 ab | 2791 ± 388 a |
| M + RF10 | 6.95 ± 1.22 a | 30.1 ± 5.94 a | 347.61 ± 72.06 ab | 372 ± 67 a | 2523 ± 329 ab | 3040 ± 745 a |
| L/Control | 4.47 ± 0.40 a | 33.3 ± 8.57 a | 339.60 ± 113.35 ab | 338 ± 53 ab | 3174 ± 724 a | 2909 ± 848 a |
| L + Fertilizer | 4.73 ± 0.93 a | 27.9 ± 4.82 a | 228.42 ± 62.20 a | 277 ± 45 ab | 2211 ± 294 ab | 2022 ± 438 a |
| L + AGF78 | 6.14 ± 0.46 a | 35.8 ± 6.22 a | 326.88 ± 28.47 ab | 268 ± 22 ab | 2285 ± 454 ab | 2505 ± 406 a |
| L + SEMIA5079 | 5.71 ± 4.67 a | 29.1 ± 9.53 a | 323.80 ± 107.36 ab | 170 ± 124 b | 2237 ± 984 ab | 2528 ± 863 a |
| L + RF10 | 4.95 ± 1.90 a | 30.4 ± 6.52 a | 286.68 ± 67.08 ab | 267 ± 79 ab | 2388 ± 502 ab | 2429 ± 575 a |
| Treatment | Root | Shoot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ(13C), ‰ | C, % | C/N | δ(13C), ‰ | C, % | C/N | |
| M/Control | –27.0 ± 0.3 a | 35.7 ± 1.2 bc | 15.0 ± 2.5 b | –27.0 ± 0.4 ab | 41.9 ± 1.1 a | 18.8 ± 1.2 bc |
| M + Fertilizer | –27.0 ± 0. 5 a | 36.0 ± 1.6 abc | 16.5 ± 1.6 ab | –26.8 ± 0.2 ab | 42.5 ± 1.1 a | 17.4 ± 1.4 abc |
| M + AGF78 | –26.8 ± 0.4 a | 36.6 ± 2.9 abc | 15.7 ± 2.3 ab | –27.0 ± 0.5 ab | 42.7 ± 0.7 a | 15.6 ± 1.7 abc |
| M + SEMIA5079 | –26.8 ± 0.3 a | 32.1 ± 2.2 b | 15.1 ± 1.7 ab | –26.9 ± 0.3 ab | 42.4 ± 1.1 a | 15.4 ± 1.3 ab |
| M + RF10 | –26.7 ± 0.2 a | 39.6 ± 1.7 ac | 24.7 ± 4.4 abc | –27.1 ± 0.2 a | 44.0 ± 2.7 a | 14.5 ± 0.6 a |
| L/Control | –26.8 ± 0.7 a | 41.2 ± 2.3 ac | 23.8 ± 4.2 abcd | –25.9 ± 0.2 c | 42.8 ± 0.4 a | 17.9 ± 1.7 abc |
| L + Fertilizer | –26.6 ± 0.2 a | 41.2 ± 0.3 a | 36.2 ± 3. 7 d | –26.4 ± 0.5 abc | 42.8 ± 0.6 a | 19.3 ± 0.9 c |
| L + AGF78 | –26.7 ± 0.4 a | 40.6 ± 0.8 ac | 25.9 ± 5.9 acd | –26.2 ± 0.3 bc | 43.3 ± 0.7 a | 15.3 ± 1.9 ab |
| L + SEMIA5079 | –26.3 ± 0.2 a | 40.4 ± 3.2 ac | 19.8 ± 2.7 ab | –26.3 ± 0.4 abc | 43.0 ± 0.3 a | 15.9 ± 2.4 abc |
| L + RF10 | –26.4 ± 0.4 a | 41.1 ± 1.4 a | 32.5 ± 8.2 cd | –26.3 ± 0.5 abc | 42.9 ± 0.4 a | 15.2 ± 1.3 abc |
| Treatment | Root | Stem and Pod | Seed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ(13C), ‰ | C, % | C/N | δ(13C), ‰ | C, % | C/N | δ(13C), ‰ | C, % | C/N | |
| M/Control | –26.2 ± 0.4 ac | 39.4 ± 1.8 bcd | 70.8 ± 14.2 bc | –26.6 ± 0.2 ab | 41.9 ± 3.3 a | 88.2 ± 4.5 bc | –26.8 ± 0.2 abcd | 49.4 ± 1.4 a | 9.2 ± 0.2 abc |
| M + Fertilizer | –25.9 ± 0.3 abcd | 35.3 ± 1.0 ab | 48.6 ± 2.9 abc | –26.6 ± 0.3 ab | 40.0 ± 0.5 a | 81.6 ± 3.7 abc | –26.8 ± 0.2 abcd | 49.5 ± 1.3 a | 9.6 ± 1.1 a |
| M + AGF78 | –26.2 ± 0.3 abc | 36.7 ± 1.0 abc | 61.1 ± 6.8 abc | –26.4 ± 0.5 ac | 40.3 ± 0.3 a | 73.3 ± 4.9 abd | –27.7 ± 0. 5 a | 48.8 ± 0.5 a | 7.4 ± 0.5 b |
| M + SEMIA5079 | –26.3 ± 0.2 c | 36.7 ± 2.1 abc | 49.5 ± 4.8 abc | –26.6 ± 0.4 ab | 42.4 ± 3.5 a | 69.4 ± 8.1 ad | –27.4 ± 0.3 abc | 49.8 ± 1.8 a | 7.5 ± 0.4 b |
| M + RF10 | –26.1 ± 0.4 abc | 35.0 ± 2.7 a | 54.8 ± 12.6 abc | –27.2 ± 0.3 b | 41.5 ± 2.1 a | 84.6 ± 6.6 abc | –27.7 ± 0.3 ac | 49.6 ± 3.3 a | 8.7 ± 0.7 abc |
| L/Control | –25.0 ± 0.2 e | 40.6 ± 0.7 cd | 75.7 ± 9.6 b | –25.9 ± 0.2 acd | 43.9 ± 2.9 a | 95.9 ± 3.8 c | –26.4 ± 0.3 bd | 48.4 ± 0.8 a | 8.7 ± 0.6 abc |
| L + Fertilizer | –25.5 ± 0.3 abde | 39.3 ± 2.7 abcd | 61.4 ± 21.1 abc | –26.3 ± 0.2 ac | 40.0 ± 0.4 a | 79.9 ± 4.9 ab | –26.6 ± 0.4 bcd | 48.1 ± 1.9 a | 8.9 ± 0.5 ac |
| L + AGF78 | –25.3 ± 0.3 de | 40.1 ± 0.8 cd | 43.7 ± 1.2 ac | –25.7 ± 0.2 cd | 40.3 ± 1.0 a | 60.1 ± 9.3 d | –25.8 ± 0.5 d | 48.0 ± 0.9 a | 7.6 ± 0.6 bc |
| L + SEMIA5079 | –25.4 ± 0.4 bde | 38.6 ± 2.6 abcd | 32.4 ± 13.2 a | –25.5 ± 0.3 d | 40.6 ± 1.0 a | 66.3 ± 8.8 ad | –26.7 ± 0.9 abcd | 49.7 ± 1.5 a | 7.8 ± 0.5 bc |
| L + RF10 | –25.6 ± 0.3 abcde | 41.5 ± 1.3 d | 58.0 ± 11.6 abc | –25.9 ± 0.5 acd | 41.3 ± 1.2 a | 74.2 ± 10.4 abd | –26.3 ± 0.5 bd | 49.9 ± 1.1 a | 8.5 ± 0.4 abc |
| Treatment | Seed Yield, g m−2 | 1000-Seed Weight, g | Seed Protein, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/Control | 202 ± 75 abc | 161 ± 16.8 a | 31.1 ± 2.75 ad |
| M + Fertilizer | 234 ± 66 abc | 158 ± 7.5 a | 30.5 ± 1.29 a |
| M + AGF78 | 294 ± 55 ab | 176 ± 7.1 ab | 36.8 ± 0.29 b |
| M + SEMIA5079 | 315 ± 74 b | 179 ± 12.0 ab | 36.9 ± 0.45 b |
| M + RF10 | 261 ± 93 abc | 174 ± 12.0 ab | 33.8 ± 1.56 cd |
| L/Control | 153 ± 28 c | 194 ± 2.0 bc | 32.9 ± 0.42 acd |
| L + Fertilizer | 136 ± 30 c | 191 ± 5.6 bc | 32.6 ± 0.44 acd |
| L + AGF78 | 178 ± 42 ac | 209 ± 3.2 c | 37.4 ± 0.20 b |
| L + SEMIA5079 | 181 ± 30 abc | 206 ± 5.9 c | 36.7 ± 0.84 b |
| L + RF10 | 136 ± 20 c | 195 ± 4.1 bc | 34.9 ± 0.82 bc |
| Factor 1—Soybean Variety (Merlin—M or Laulema—L) | |||
| Factor 2—Amendment | |||
| No. | Amendment | Manufacturer | Abbreviation |
| 1 | Control (neither fertilization, nor inoculation) | No inoculation, no fertilizers | Control |
| 2 | Organic cattle manure | Granulated cattle manure fertilizer (N—3%, δ(15N)—6.5‰, P2O5—1.5%, K2O—7%, organic matter ~72%, pH 9), Agrolinija | Fertilizer |
| 3 | B. japonicum strain AGF_78 | Bactolive RHIZO-MIC UG, St. Johann, Germany | AGF_78 |
| 4 | B. japonicum strain SEMIA 5079 | Basf HiStick HiStick® Soy (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany) | SEMIA_5079 |
| 5 | B. japonicum strain RF10 | RhizoFix RF-10 Feldsaaten Freudenberger GmbH & Co. KGcontaining, Krefeld, Germany | RF_10 |
| 10 treatments as the combination of factors: (1) M/Control; (2) M + Fertilizer; (3) M + AGF78; (4) M + SEMIA5079; (5) M + RF10; (6) L/Control; (7) L + Fertilizer; (8) L + AGF78; (9) L + SEMIA5079; (10) L + RF10 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Skipitytė, R.; Barisevičiūtė, R.; Jamil, Y.; Toleikienė, M. Isotopic Nitrogen and Carbon Allocation Among Soybean Plant Parts Under Impact of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains. Plants 2026, 15, 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121900
Skipitytė R, Barisevičiūtė R, Jamil Y, Toleikienė M. Isotopic Nitrogen and Carbon Allocation Among Soybean Plant Parts Under Impact of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains. Plants. 2026; 15(12):1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121900
Chicago/Turabian StyleSkipitytė, Raminta, Rūta Barisevičiūtė, Yasha Jamil, and Monika Toleikienė. 2026. "Isotopic Nitrogen and Carbon Allocation Among Soybean Plant Parts Under Impact of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains" Plants 15, no. 12: 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121900
APA StyleSkipitytė, R., Barisevičiūtė, R., Jamil, Y., & Toleikienė, M. (2026). Isotopic Nitrogen and Carbon Allocation Among Soybean Plant Parts Under Impact of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains. Plants, 15(12), 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15121900

