Next Article in Journal
Major Gene with Polygene Inheritance Analysis of Prostrate Growth Habit in Hybrids of Chrysanthemum yantaiense × C. indicum
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in Typification Within Taxonomically Complex Groups: The Case of the Linnaean Name Centaurea phrygia (Asteraceae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Light Adaptations of Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth: Functional Analysis of Leaf and Petal Interfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Record of Flower Bud Galls in Senega (Fabales: Polygalaceae): The Case of S. salasiana and Their Effect on Plant Reproduction

by
Agustina Martinez
1,*,
Nicolás Kuzmanich
2 and
Alejandro Farji-Brener
3
1
Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA), Universidad Nacional del Comahue-CRUB, CONICET, Bariloche 8400, Argentina
2
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal-CONICET, Edificio de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas, Córdoba 5000, Argentina
3
Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA, LIHO), Universidad Nacional del Comahue-CRUB, CONICET, Bariloche 8400, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(9), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091337
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 27 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025

Abstract

:
We report the first case of flower bud galls in a species of the mainly American genus Senega (Polygalaceae), specifically in the South Andean Patagonian plant species S. salasiana. The galls were found to be induced by gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) and mites (Acari). We also assessed their impact on plant reproduction by measuring the relationship between inflorescence density (number of inflorescences/plant cover) and gall abundance in two populations next to San Carlos de Bariloche, Patagonia, Argentina. Plant reproduction was negatively related to the number of galled inflorescences, suggesting that high levels of gall abundance strongly reduced plant reproductive success. Our study illustrates a novel case of flower galls in the genus Senega and highlights the negative impact of this type of herbivory on plant fitness.

1. Introduction

Plants face different kinds of herbivory that may differentially affect their fitness. One well-documented example is foliar herbivory, where leaf loss can significantly reduce a plant’s ability to photosynthesize and allocate resources to reproduction [1]. This can lead to decreased flower production, lower seed set, and reduced overall reproductive success [2]. Unlike leaf-feeding herbivores, gall-inducing organisms modify plant tissues by creating novel structures called galls, which can alter resource allocation, disrupting normal development and impacting reproductive structures. While some studies have explored these effects [3,4,5], more research is needed to fully understand how galls influence plant fitness.
Galls are a type of herbivory in which an organism induces a tissue reorganization in a plant organ and gives place to a new structure that provides food, shelter, and/or protection to the gall inducer and its progeny [6]. Galls can take place in different organs of the plants, affecting their growth and reproduction [7]. They are usually located in leaves, stems, roots, and flowers [8,9,10]. A less common type of gall affects the whole inflorescence, as is the case reported here for the first time in a species of the mainly American genus Senega.
Senega species (Polygalaceae) are known for their medicinal properties [11]. However, they have only gained importance in recent years, with the systematic and phylogenetic studies led mostly by Pastore [12,13,14], which resulted in the segregation of the genus from the traditional Polygala Old World Clade [15]. This work was carried out in collaboration with Martinez et al. [16,17], who included the Andean Patagonian species.
This recently addressed gap in basic taxonomic information on the Andean Patagonian Senega species explains the lack of studies related to their biological interactions, ecology, and phytochemistry, which are critical for understanding the group. Currently, herbivory studies in the whole plant family are scarce, with only a few documented cases of galls. In the Americas, there are three reported cases of Polygalaceae species hosting gall-inducing organisms. Stem galls were caused by an unidentified gall inducer in the Brazilian shrub Bredemeyera floribunda [18]; flower bud galls were induced by Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) in the genus Securidaca [19], and stem galls were caused by Lepidoptera (Saphenista muerta) in Costa Rica’s shrub Monnina crepinii [20]. In Argentina, where eight genera and 61 Polygalaceae species occur [17], no records of this interaction exist in the literature. In South Africa, the native Polygala myrtifolia and related Polygalaceae species have been extensively studied to identify phytophagous organisms for potential biological control of this plant in Australia. These studies reported bud galls in the leaves and flowers of P. myrtifolia, P. virgata, and P. leptophylla; as well as stem galls in Muraltia spinosa and M. heisteria and the Australian species P. japonica and Comesperma volubile, all of them caused by Acari of the genus Aceria (A. myrtifoliae and A. virgatae) [21,22]. The same study also reported that Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the genus Dasineura induce galls in the South African P. peduncularis and P. teretifolia, leading to stunted stem growth and, in some cases, death of the stem meristems [21].
Senega salasiana is a prostrate herbaceous species endemic to Argentina and Chile, distributed along the Andes from approximately 30° S Coquimbo (Chile) to the southernmost regions of South America in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). It occupies a wide elevational range, growing from sea level up to 2900 m a.s.l. on slopes and mountain peaks. This species is characterized by its small (4 to 5 mm), zygomorphic flowers arranged in “capituliform” racemes, typically comprising around seven flowers per inflorescence. The spathulate, glabrous leaves may sometimes extend beyond the inflorescence (for further details and photographs, see Martinez [17]). In San Carlos de Bariloche, S. salasiana populations occur very isolated and are scarce (A. Martinez, personal observation). In this region, populations remain under snow during the winter months and begin to emerge in late October. Flowering starts in mid-November, with the earliest blooms observed in the eastern populations. By mid-December, fruit development is underway, and by early February, most of the capsules with their seeds fall.
Despite the limited research on herbivory in Polygalaceae, no studies have examined the effects of the galling organism on plant reproduction. Galls are frequently linked to decreased plant growth and reproduction. It has been suggested that galled plants produce fewer flowers and fruits, resulting in lower reproductive success [23,24]. Furthermore, the negative impacts of galling organisms can be more pronounced when gall induction occurs during the early stages of the reproductive season. Additionally, galls near the reproductive organs can significantly affect fruit and seed production, directly influencing the host plant’s fitness [7].
Here, we studied the interactions between two galling organisms and S. salasiana (Polygalaceae) with the aim of describing the gall morphotypes and assessing the effect of gall abundance on plant reproduction in two populations near San Carlos de Bariloche, Rio Negro, and Patagonia, Argentina. If galls negatively affect plant reproduction, we expect that inflorescence density decreases as the gall abundance per plant increases.

2. Results

2.1. Galls Description

In S. salasiana, we identified two distinct flower gall morphotypes. The first morphotype (Diptera) was found in both populations (Cerro Villegas and Cerro San Martin), while the second morphotype (Acari) was observed exclusively in the Cerro San Martin population. Single plants hosting mixed galls induced by both agents were frequently observed. Galls were found in the early stages of plant development, forming in flower buds, and continued to be present throughout the plant’s reproductive season, eventually drying up and falling off. The first morphotype is a well-defined, rosette-like structure of overlapping abnormal leaves that are thickened and bunched together to form a bulbous swelling of around 5 mm in diameter (Figure 1A). This gall morphotype was found to be induced by Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). Each gall contained two to five larvae, each one residing in a cup-like cavity at the center of the abnormal leaves surrounding the shoot meristem. The larvae later pupated inside silky cocoons on these abnormal leaves (Figure 2).
The second morphotype is an irregular and amorphous growth of the flower bud. It is characterized by stunted, fleshy, crinkled terminal and irregularly thickened leaves forming a distorted rosebud-like terminal structure (Figure 1B). This gall type was induced by whitish mites (Acari: Eriophyinae: Acerini), which were observed under a magnified glass within the hypertrophied inflorescences (Figure 3).
Through the citizen science platform iNaturalist [25], we identified at least one record of galls in S. salasiana from Tierra del Fuego province, Argentina [26], and another from the department of Minas, Neuquén province, Argentina [27] (Figure 4).

2.2. Effect on the Number of Inflorescences

The mean gall abundance per plant was 5 ± 0.43 (Mean ± SE). Most plants hosted three galls (16%), while a small proportion (2%) had a maximum of 22 galls.
The inflorescence density was negatively affected by the gall abundance (F1,96 = 6.6, p = 0.01). Plants with fewer than six galls showed a high variation in the inflorescence density, whereas those with more than eight galls consistently showed lower inflorescence density (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

This study presents two key findings. First, it provides the first quantitative data on previously unknown interactions between a plant and two galling organisms in Patagonia. Second, it confirms that galls have a negative effect on plant reproduction, especially in plants with high gall abundance.
The discovery of this novel interaction highlights the importance of studying plant–animal interactions, as previously unknown species or host relationships may exist, especially in underexplored places such as Patagonia. Given that new species and even genera continue to be identified within Cecidomyiidae [28,29,30,31,32] and Acari [33,34,35,36], further research is necessary to clarify the taxonomic identity of the gall-inducing species on S. salasiana. Identifying these organisms would enhance our understanding of their evolutionary history, biogeographical distribution, life cycles, and ecological interactions with their host plant and the broader ecological community.
The galls observed on S. salasiana in the Argentinian Patagonia closely resemble those reported by Adair et al. [21] for the South African Polygalaceae species. Specifically, the gall morphotype induced by Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) shares striking similarities with those caused by Dasineura sp., while the second morphotype induced by Acari is comparable to the galls caused by Aceria sp. [21]. This morphological resemblance suggests possible convergent evolution or a historical biogeographical connection between these gall-inducing taxa across continents.
Through records obtained via the citizen science platform iNaturalist [25], we documented at least one observation of galls on S. salasiana in Tierra del Fuego, the southernmost distribution of the species [26]. Additionally, another observation was recorded in the Minas department, Neuquén province, Argentina [27], at almost the northern limit of its range (Figure 4). These records confirm the presence of the gall–plant interaction across nearly the entire distribution of S. salasiana. This broad geographic occurrence raises questions about potential evolutionary relationships between the plant and its gall-inducing organisms, warranting further investigation, such as whether the same galling species are present throughout the entire plant’s range or if different species are present in different regions. Additionally, the role of environmental factors like climate and elevation in shaping the distribution and intensity of gall formation remains to be explored.
Galls can affect plant fitness in several ways, depending on their location and severity. When they develop on leaves, they can reduce the plant’s photosynthetic capacity, thereby limiting the resources available for reproductive structures such as flowers and seeds. However, in this case, the galls exclusively affect the inflorescences, having a direct impact on reproduction. By atrophying the complete inflorescence, these galls can obstruct pollination in multiple ways: physically reducing the number of flowers available for pollinators and potentially altering the visual and chemical cues that attract pollinators, leading to reduced visitation rates.
The negative impact on plant reproduction suggests that gall formation could influence S. salasiana population dynamics, potentially reducing seed production and altering plant fitness. This may have consequences on the local ecosystem, especially if S. salasiana serves as a resource for other organisms. For example, in Cerro Villegas, S. salasiana flowers have been observed as a food source for Pseudomeloe beetles, a previously unreported interaction [37]. This highlights the plant’s ecological role in supporting both herbivores and pollinators. Furthermore, as S. salasiana seeds appear to be adapted for ant-mediated dispersal, reduced seed availability due to galling might also impact the assembly of seed and dispersers. Further research is also needed to investigate the presence of parasitoids associated with gall-inducing arthropods. Identifying these factors could provide valuable insight into the broader ecological dynamics of gall formation and its impact on both the host plant and associated species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area

In San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro province, Argentina, S. salasiana populations were searched using herbarium records published in a recent taxonomic revision of Senega subg. Clinclinia [17], as well as observations from the citizen science platform iNaturalist [25]. Four populations above 1100 m a.s.l., from late October 2024 to the beginning of February 2025, were found. From East to West: 1. Cerro Villegas; 2. Cerro Otto; 3. Cerro San Martín; and 4. Cerro Catedral. Galled plants were found only in populations from Cerro Villegas and Cerro San Martin. Thus, the only populations analyzed in this study were Cerro Villegas and Cerro San Martin (Figure 4).
  • Cerro Villegas 41°02′51″ S, 71°06′44″ W, 1175 to1202 m a.s.l., measured 28 November 2024. The site vegetation showed a predominance of Acaena sp. and grasses, with the presence of Astragalus sp., Adesmia sp., and Viola maculata. The population area measured was approximately 3240 m2;
  • Cerro San Martin, 41°9′36″ S, 71°25′45″ W, 1260 to 1266 m a.s.l., measured 8 and 17 December 2024. The site vegetation showed a predominance of Anemone multifida, Quinchamalium sp., Acaena sp., Alstroemeria aurea, and Berberis microphylla. The population area measured was approximately 3080 m2.

4.2. Methodology

Through field observations, we searched for galls in S. salasiana. Sample galls were collected, observed, and photographed through a magnifying glass. In Acari galls, a gall sample was kept in 70% ethanol together with a herbarized gall sample. In the laboratory, Diptera galls, along with some larvae and pupae, were kept in glass jars under natural environmental conditions for approximately 1 to 7 days until adults emerged. Larvae, pupae, and adult stages were photographed (Figure 2) and kept in 70% ethanol together with a herbarized gall sample. All samples were deposited at the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (MACN) in Buenos Aires. Vouchers were identified as “A. Martinez 1 to 3” for Diptera and “A. Martinez 4” for Acari. Galling inducers were identified at the highest level of taxonomic resolution possible by comparison with reference material and identification keys available in the literature [28,38].

4.3. Data Collection

4.3.1. Gall Abundance per Plant, Number of Inflorescences, and Plant Cover

S. salasiana plants were inspected for galls during the spring of 2024. We found 98 plants, and for each plant, we measured the number of galls (gall abundance), the number of inflorescences, and the plant cover. The plant cover was estimated as an ellipse, measuring the length and width of the plant with a hand ruler (Figure 6, Table S1).

4.3.2. Data Analysis

To determine the effect of gall abundance on plant reproduction, we conducted a linear regression using the software Statistica® Version 8.0 between the number of galls per plant as the independent variable and the inflorescence density (i.e., the number of inflorescences per plant/plant cover) as the dependent variable (Figure 5).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14091337/s1, Table S1. Gall abundance and inflorescence density per plant during November and December 2024.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and A.F.-B.; methodology, A.M. and A.F.-B.; taxa identification, A.M. and N.K.; formal analysis, A.M. and A.F.-B.; investigation, A.M.; resources, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.F.-B. and N.K.; figures, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

A.M. gratefully acknowledges support from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Marquis, R.J. Leaf Herbivores Decrease Fitness of a Tropical Plant. Science 1984, 226, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Viana, L.R.; Silveira, F.A.O.; Santos, J.C.; Rosa, L.H.; Cares, J.E.; Café-Filho, A.C.; Fernandes, G.W. Nematode-induced galls in Miconia albicans: Effect of host plant density and correlations with performance. Plant Species Biol. 2013, 28, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Silva, I.M.; Andrade, G.I.; Fernandes, G.W.; Lemos Filho, J.P. Parasitic Relationships between a Gall-forming Insect Tomoplagia rudolphi (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its Host Plant (Vernonia polyanthes, Asteraceae). Ann. Bot. 1996, 78, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Petro, R.; Madoffe, S.S.; Iddi, S.; Mugasha, W.A. Impact of Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa infestation on growth and biomass production of Eucalyptus grandis and E. saligna seedlings in Tanzania. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2015, 61, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Strydom, M.; Veldtman, R.; Ngwenya, M.Z.; Esler, K.J. Questioning the effectiveness of seed-reducing agents on invasive Acacia: Pod production relative to gall abundance of classical biological control agents. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2024, 64, 125813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shorthouse, J.D.; Wool, D.; Raman, A. Gall-inducing insects—Nature’s most sophisticated herbivores. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barrancos, M.L.; Moncaglieri, R.; Farji-Brener, A. Infección por agallas y producción de inflorescencias en el arbusto Schinus patagonicus. Ecol. Austral. 2008, 18, 133–137. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mani, M.S. Ecology of Plant Galls; Monographiae Biologicae; Weisbach, W.W., Van Oye, P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuzmanich, N.; Altamirano, A.A.; Salvo, A. Agallas de insectos de la región Rioplatense, Buenos Aires. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent 2015, 74, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuzmanich, N.; Giorgis, M.A.; Salvo, A. Insect galls from Córdoba, Argentina: A case where stem galls predominate. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2018, 66, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Medicinal Plant Names Services Portal, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Version 14. 2025. Available online: http://mpns.kew.org/mpns-portal (accessed on 28 April 2025).
  12. Pastore, J.F.B.; Abbott, J.R.; Neubig, K.M.; Van Den Berg, C.; Mota, M.C.D.A.; Cabral, A.; Whitten, W.M. Phylogeny and biogeography of Polygala (Polygalaceae). Taxon 2019, 68, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pastore, J.F.B.; Mota, M.; Amano, E.; Martinez, A. Disentangling Polygala obovata Complex (Polygalaceae), with a Description of Three New Species for Brazil. Syst. Bot. 2021, 46, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pastore, J.F.B. Revision of the ‘Polygala herbiola group’ (Polygalaceae): A new species and a new variety. Kew Bull. 2022, 77, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pastore, J.F.B.; Martinez, A.; Abbott, J.R.; Neubig, K. Toward New Generic Delimitations in Polygalaceae II: Senega. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2023, 108, 126–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martinez, A.; Acosta, J.M.; Ferrero, M.A.; Pastore, F.B.; Aagesen, L. Evolutionary patterns within the New World Clade Polygala sections Clinclinia and Monninopsis (Polygalaceae). Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2022, 55, 125673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martinez, A. Revisión de Senega subgénero Clinclinia (Polygalaceae). Darwiniana Nueva Ser. 2023, 11, 541–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Urso-Guimarães, M.V.; Scareli-Santos, C. Galls and gall makers in plants from the Pé-de-Gigante Cerrado Reserve, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 2006, 66, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ramos Rodrigues, A.; Maia, V.C.; Souto Couri, M. Insect galls of restinga areas of Ilha da Marambaia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2014, 58, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nishida, K.; Adamski, D. Two new gall-inducing Saphenista Walsingham (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Cochylini) from Costa Rica. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2004, 106, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  21. Adair, R.J.; Neser, S.; Stajsic, V. Phytophagous Organisms Associated with the Woody Shrub “Polygala myrtifolia” (Polygalaceae) and Their Potential for Classical Biological Control in Australia. Plant Prot. Q. 2011, 26, 72–80. [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith Meyer, M.K.P.; Ueckermann, E.A. Three new species of Aceria (Acari: Eriophyidae) from South African Polygalaceae and Polygonaceae. Int. J. Acarol. 1996, 22, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martini, V.C.; Raymundo, D.; Prado-Junior, J.; Oliveira, D.C. Bottom-up and top-down forces in plant-gall relationships: Testing the hypotheses of resource concentration, associational resistance, and host fitness reduction. Ecol. Entomol. 2021, 46, 1072–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leege, L.M. The relationship between psyllid leaf galls and redbay (Persea borbonia) fitness traits in sun and shade. Plant Ecol. 2006, 184, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. iNaturalist. 2025. Available online: https://www.inaturalist.org/home (accessed on 28 April 2025).
  26. Castillo, C. Observation of Senega salasiana. In iNaturalist. 2021. Available online: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102924729 (accessed on 28 April 2025).
  27. Sersic, A. Observation of Senega salasiana. In iNaturalist. 2007. Available online: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103823852 (accessed on 28 April 2025).
  28. Gagné, R.J.; Jaschof, M. A Catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the World, 5th ed.; Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington; Entomological Society of Washington: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; 816p. Available online: https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80420580/Gagne_Jaschhof_2021_World_Cat_5th_Ed.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2025).
  29. Kolesik, P.; McFadyen, R.E.C.; Wapshere, A.J. New gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) infesting native and introduced Solanum spp. (Solanaceae) in Australia. Trans. R Soc. S Aust. Inc. 2000, 124, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolesik, P.; Sutton, G.F.; Steenderen, C.J.M.; Martins, D.J.; Plowes, R.; Paterson, I.D. A new genus and two new species of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) feeding on Guinea grass Megathyrsus maximus (Poaceae) in Africa. Austral. Entomol. 2025, 64, 12719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kolesik, P.; Sutherland, R.; Gillard, K.; Gresham, B.; Withers, T.M. A new species of Mycodiplosis gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) feeding on myrtle rust Austropuccinia psidii. N. Z. Entomol. 2021, 44, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kolesik, P.; Adair, R.J.; Eick, G. Nine new species of Dasineura (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from flowers of Australian Acacia (Mimosaceae). Syst. Entomol. 2005, 30, 454–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Flechtmann, C.H.W.; De Queiroz, D.L. New taxa in the Eriophyidae (Acari, Prostigmata) from forest trees in southern Brazil. Zootaxa 2010, 2337, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chetverikov, P.E.; Desnitskiy, A.G.; Letukhova, V.Y.; Ozman-sullivan, S.K.; Romanovich, A.E.; Sarratt, J.V.; Sukhareva, S.I. A new species, new records, and DNA barcodes of eriophyine mites (Eriophyidae, Eriophyinae) from southeast Crimea and remarks on ability to form galls in conspecific eriophyoids. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 26, 1721–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khaustov, A.A.; Fjellberg, A.; Lindquist, E.E. A new genus and species of Pseudotarsonemoidini (Acari: Heterostigmata: Tarsonemidae) associated with xylophagous gall midges in Norway. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 27, 1020–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Situngu, S.; Elhalawany, A.S.; Ngubane-Ndhlovu, N.P.; Chetverikov, P.E. New species and records of gall mites of the genus Aceria (Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae) associated with Tamarix in Egypt and South Africa. Acarologia 2023, 63, 1271–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Safenraiter, M.E.; Campos-Soldini, M.P.; Fernández, E.E.N.; Del Rio, M.G. Escarabajos vesicantes Sudamericanos (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Aportes al estado del conocimiento del género andino Pseudomeloe Fairmaire y Germain. Idesia Arica 2019, 37, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Manson, D.C.M. Eriophyinae (Arachnida: Acari: Eriophyoidea). Fauna N. Z. 1984, 5, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gall morphotypes. (A) Diptera bud gall, a rosette-like structure of overlapping abnormal leaves, which are thickened and bunched together to form a bulbous swelling around 5 mm in diameter. (B) Acari bud gall, an irregular and amorphous structure, stunted, fleshy, crinkly terminal, and irregularly thickened leaves forming an amorphous rosebud-like terminal structure.
Figure 1. Gall morphotypes. (A) Diptera bud gall, a rosette-like structure of overlapping abnormal leaves, which are thickened and bunched together to form a bulbous swelling around 5 mm in diameter. (B) Acari bud gall, an irregular and amorphous structure, stunted, fleshy, crinkly terminal, and irregularly thickened leaves forming an amorphous rosebud-like terminal structure.
Plants 14 01337 g001
Figure 2. Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) life stages observed. (A) Two larvae on a hypertrophied leaf. (B) Pupae with part of the cocoon removed. (C) Adult female. (D) Adult male.
Figure 2. Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) life stages observed. (A) Two larvae on a hypertrophied leaf. (B) Pupae with part of the cocoon removed. (C) Adult female. (D) Adult male.
Plants 14 01337 g002
Figure 3. White mites (Acari) and their eggs were observed on bud galls.
Figure 3. White mites (Acari) and their eggs were observed on bud galls.
Plants 14 01337 g003
Figure 4. (A) Known distribution of Senega salasiana in Patagonia indicated by yellow dots (adapted from [17]). Black dots indicate gall occurrences in San Carlos de Bariloche, documented in this study, along with additional records from iNaturalist in Neuquén and Tierra del Fuego provinces [26,27]. (B) Populations of S. salasiana analyzed in this study around San Carlos de Bariloche. Yellow stars indicate the populations studied; yellow dots represent populations where no galls were found.
Figure 4. (A) Known distribution of Senega salasiana in Patagonia indicated by yellow dots (adapted from [17]). Black dots indicate gall occurrences in San Carlos de Bariloche, documented in this study, along with additional records from iNaturalist in Neuquén and Tierra del Fuego provinces [26,27]. (B) Populations of S. salasiana analyzed in this study around San Carlos de Bariloche. Yellow stars indicate the populations studied; yellow dots represent populations where no galls were found.
Plants 14 01337 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between the gall abundance per plant and the inflorescence density per plant in Senega salasiana in both populations (Villegas and San Martin) (F1,96 = 6.6, p = 0.01). Each dot represents a single plant observation (n = 96). Solid blue line indicates a negative linear regression between gall abundance and inflorescence density across all observations. Dashed blue lines indicate the confidence intervals (96%) around the regression line.
Figure 5. Relationship between the gall abundance per plant and the inflorescence density per plant in Senega salasiana in both populations (Villegas and San Martin) (F1,96 = 6.6, p = 0.01). Each dot represents a single plant observation (n = 96). Solid blue line indicates a negative linear regression between gall abundance and inflorescence density across all observations. Dashed blue lines indicate the confidence intervals (96%) around the regression line.
Plants 14 01337 g005
Figure 6. Senega salasiana with Cecidomiidae galls. The number of inflorescences is 8, and the number of galls is 2. Also, length and width are depicted as measured for this study.
Figure 6. Senega salasiana with Cecidomiidae galls. The number of inflorescences is 8, and the number of galls is 2. Also, length and width are depicted as measured for this study.
Plants 14 01337 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinez, A.; Kuzmanich, N.; Farji-Brener, A. First Record of Flower Bud Galls in Senega (Fabales: Polygalaceae): The Case of S. salasiana and Their Effect on Plant Reproduction. Plants 2025, 14, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091337

AMA Style

Martinez A, Kuzmanich N, Farji-Brener A. First Record of Flower Bud Galls in Senega (Fabales: Polygalaceae): The Case of S. salasiana and Their Effect on Plant Reproduction. Plants. 2025; 14(9):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinez, Agustina, Nicolás Kuzmanich, and Alejandro Farji-Brener. 2025. "First Record of Flower Bud Galls in Senega (Fabales: Polygalaceae): The Case of S. salasiana and Their Effect on Plant Reproduction" Plants 14, no. 9: 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091337

APA Style

Martinez, A., Kuzmanich, N., & Farji-Brener, A. (2025). First Record of Flower Bud Galls in Senega (Fabales: Polygalaceae): The Case of S. salasiana and Their Effect on Plant Reproduction. Plants, 14(9), 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop