Next Article in Journal
Physiological, Biochemical, and Transcriptomic Responses to Iron Deficiency in Two Potato Varieties
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of High- and Low-Cadmium (Cd)-Accumulating Rice Cultivars Using Combined Molecular Markers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microwave Treatment for Citrus Huanglongbing Control: Pathogen Elimination and Metabolomic Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of Highly Virulent Beauveria bassiana Strains Against Tuta absoluta Larvae and Evaluation of Their Endophytic Colonization-Mediated Suppression in Tomato Plants

1
Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Waterlogging Disaster and Agricultural Use of Wetland, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Invasive Alien Species of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
3
Agroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(18), 2932; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182932
Submission received: 20 July 2025 / Revised: 28 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 September 2025 / Published: 21 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Plant Protection)

Abstract

To identify highly virulent Beauveria bassiana strains against Tuta absoluta and evaluate their biocontrol potential, four strains were phylogenetically characterized via ITS sequence analysis of rDNA and assessed for virulence against second-instar T. absoluta larvae. Foliar spray and root irrigation methods were used to establish B. bassiana endophytic colonization in tomato plants, with untreated plants serving as controls. A population life table was constructed to quantify the impact of colonized plants on larval development, fecundity, and key demographic parameters. Results showed variation in virulence among the four B. bassiana strains Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, Bb1M, and BbC with Bb1Bm exhibiting the highest pathogenicity (85.00% corrected mortality at 1 × 108 spores/mL). Maximum endophytic colonization in tomato leaves was observed 14 days post-inoculation with both foliar spray and root irrigation treatments. Life table analyses revealed that T. absoluta feeding on colonized plants exhibited significantly reduced survival rates, shorter adult lifespans, and lower female fecundity compared to controls. Key population parameters, including net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), and finite rate of increase (λ), were significantly reduced, while mean generation time (T) was significantly prolonged. These findings highlight the dual role of B. bassiana in T. absoluta management, demonstrating its potential as both a direct pathogen and an endophytic biocontrol agent capable of disrupting pest population dynamics.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the world’s most economically significant vegetable crop, with China leading global production and continuously expanding cultivation areas [1]. The South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta (syn: Phthorimaea absoluta) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a major pest of tomato crops, with larvae acting as leaf miners that tunnel into leaves, stems, and terminal buds, causing extensive necrosis [2]. Feeding within the mesophyll tissue reduces photosynthetic capacity and significantly diminishes yields [3]. Without effective management, T. absoluta infestations can lead to 80–100% annual yield losses [4].
Chemical insecticides have been widely used to control T. absoluta [2]. However, continuous pesticide applications have led to rapid resistance development in T. absoluta populations [5,6], diminishing their efficacy. Additionally, excessive pesticide use disrupts natural enemy populations and contributes to environmental contamination [7,8,9]. Given these challenges, sustainable and environmentally friendly pest management strategies are urgently needed. Biopesticides, particularly entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), have emerged as promising alternatives and are increasingly integrated into pest management programs [10,11].
Biocontrol agents, such as entomopathogenic fungi, have prominent virulence factors and have rapidly emerged as prime substitutes for synthetic insecticides [12]. EPF, such as Beauveria bassiana, offer an effective and environmentally friendly approach to pest suppression [13]. B. bassiana has been successfully established as an endophyte in multiple crop species, including tomato [14], tobacco [15], grape [16], and cowpea [17]. As an endophyte, B. bassiana not only directly kills insect pests but also enhances plant defense responses, reducing herbivore damage [16,18]. Additionally, it produces specialized metabolites that exert insecticidal effects beyond the fungal infection [19]. Among lepidopteran pests, B. bassiana has demonstrated high virulence, making it a strong candidate for T. absoluta management [20].
Research on screening highly virulent B. bassiana strains for T. absoluta control has gained global attention [21,22]. In Ethiopia [23] and Tunisia [24], researchers have identified B. bassiana strains with strong pathogenicity against T. absoluta, while commercial formulations are being evaluated for large-scale implementation [25,26,27]. Studies also indicate that B. bassiana endophytic colonization in tomato plants enhances its effectiveness against T. absoluta. For instance, tomato plants colonized by B. bassiana strain LPP139 achieved 100% larval mortality [14], while strain SN182 significantly increased larval mortality and reduced leaf damage [28]. These findings suggest that endophytic colonization can effectively suppress T. absoluta populations. However, detailed studies on how B. bassiana colonization affects T. absoluta life history traits and population dynamics remain limited. In particular, research on high-virulence B. bassiana strains for T. absoluta control in China is still in its early stages.
This study aims to identify a highly virulent B. bassiana strain against T. absoluta larvae and assess its impact on pest population dynamics when established as an endophyte in tomato plants. By analyzing life table parameters, we seek to clarify the effects of B. bassiana colonization on T. absoluta development and reproduction, providing a foundation for integrating B. bassiana into sustainable pest management strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Entomopathogenic Fungi, Insects, and Plants

Four B. bassiana strains (Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, BbC, and BbM) used in this study were isolated from infected Bombyx mori (silkworms) purchased from markets, and were provided by Professor Yi Zhou (College of Agriculture, Yangtze University). Although molecular identification was not performed, all strains were purified and maintained under laboratory conditions.
T. absoluta larvae were collected in January 2024 from unmanaged tomato greenhouses in Datong City, Shanxi Province, China. The collected colony was maintained in the laboratory on tomato plants (“Fenjiaren” tomato, provided by Shandong Shouhe Seed Industry Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) under controlled conditions (26 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, 14:10 h L:D photoperiod). The colony had been reared for two generations prior to the experiment.
Tomato seeds (Zhongza No. 9) were obtained from China Vegetable Seed Technology (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd. Before sowing, seeds were surface-sterilized in 1% NaClO for 5 min with agitation, rinsed three times in sterile distilled water, and dried on sterile filter paper. The growth substrate (nutrient soil/vermiculite = 2.5:1; Beijing Xinbo Weiye Flower Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min and cooled to room temperature before use. Sterilized seeds were soaked in sterile ddH2O for 2 h, placed on moistened filter paper for germination. After 2 days, seeds were transferred with a sterilized brush to a 64-cell seedling tray containing sterilized substrate (one seed per cell) and grown in an insect-free greenhouse (26 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, 14:10 h L:D photoperiod). Seedlings at the two-true-leaf stage were moved to pots (10 cm height × 7.5 cm diameter) filled with sterile substrate and maintained with uniform water and nutrient management until required for experimentation.

2.2. Identification of B. bassiana

The four B. bassiana strains were cultured on PDA at 26 ± 1 °C in complete darkness for 14 days. Conidia were harvested and submitted to Rui Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China for internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. The obtained sequences were analyzed using the NCBI BLAST+ 2.17.0 tool to confirm species identity. To clarify phylogenetic relationships, ITS sequences of 14 reported Beauveria species were retrieved from the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 28 January 2024), including Beauveria majiangensis (NR_158356.1), Beauveria asiatica (NR_111596.1), Beauveria australis (NR_111597.1), Beauveria brongniartii (NR_111595.1), Beauveria pseudobassiana (NR_111598.1), Beauveria amorpha (NR_111601.1), Beauveria caledonica (NR_077147.1), Beauveria vermiconia (NR_151832.1), Beauveria kipukae (NR_111600.1), Beauveria sungii (NR_111602.1), Beauveria malawiensis (NR_136979.1), Beauveria varroae (NR_111599.1), Beauveria lii (NR_111678.1), and Beauveria bassiana (ON796013.1). Cordyceps ningxiaensis (Cordycipitaceae) (NR_137117.1) was selected as the outgroup. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA 7.0 with the neighbor-joining method, and bootstrap support was assessed using 1000 replicates.

2.3. Pathogenicity Bioassay of B. bassiana Strains Against T. absoluta

Fungi were cultured as described in Section 2.2. Conidia were harvested, suspended in sterile 0.1% (v/v) Tween-80 solution, and homogenized by magnetic stirring for 5 min. The suspension was adjusted to 1 × 107 spores/mL using a hemocytometer.
When the transplanted tomato plants described in Section 2.1 reached approximately 35 cm in height, pinnately compound leaves of about 10 cm in length were excised for use in the experiments. Petioles were inserted into 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes filled with water to maintain leaf turgor, and each leaf was placed in a sterile 15 cm Petri dish lined with sterile filter paper. Uniformly sized second-instar T. absoluta larvae selected from rearing cages were immersed in 100 mL of conidial suspension for 10 s at 21 April 2024. Control larvae were treated with sterile water containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-80. Treated larvae were moved onto tomato leaves and incubated under controlled conditions (26 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% RH, 14:10 h L:D photoperiod) for 14 days. Mortality was recorded daily, and corrected mortality was calculated using the following formula [29]:
Corrected mortality rate = [(mortality rate of treatment − mortality rate of control)/(1 − mortality rate of control)] × 100%

2.4. Lethal Concentration and Time of B. bassiana Bb1Bm Against T. absoluta

The most virulent strain, Bb1Bm (identified in Section 2.3), was evaluated for median lethal concentration (LC50) and median lethal time (LT50) against T. absoluta larvae following Silva et al., (2020) [14]. Spore suspensions at 1 × 108, 1 × 107, 1 × 106, 1 × 105, and 1 × 104 spores/mL were prepared as described in Section 2.2, and uniformly staged second-instar larvae were exposed to each concentration at 10 May 2024. Cumulative mortality was recorded daily for 14 days, and the final mortality rates were analyzed by probit regression. Each concentration treatment was replicated eight times.

2.5. Inoculation and Detection of B. bassiana Colonization

A conidial suspension of B. bassiana strain Bb1Bm was prepared at 1 × 108 conidia/mL as described in Section 2.3 and used immediately for inoculation. Inoculation was performed when the transplanted tomato plants described in Section 2.1 had developed four pinnately compound leaves. Two inoculation methods were employed: foliar spraying (BbFS) and root irrigation (BbRI).
For the BbFS method, to prevent cross-contamination from soil splash, the lower stem and soil surface were wrapped in cling film before inoculation. A handheld sprayer was used to evenly apply 10 mL of the spore suspension per plant onto the upper leaf surfaces. For the BbRI method, 10 mL of the spore suspension was slowly introduced into the topsoil (0–5 cm depth) surrounding the root zone using a 10 mL syringe. Control plants were sprayed with a 10 mL 0.1% (v/v) Tween-80 solution on 13 May 2024. All treated plants were maintained at 26 ± 1 °C and 75 ± 5% relative humidity under a 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod.
Endophytic colonization of B. bassiana in tomato tissues was confirmed using PDA isolation. At 3, 7, 14, and 21 days post-inoculation, six plants per treatment were randomly selected. Stems and leaves were excised, triple-rinsed with sterile water to remove epiphytic fungi, and surface-sterilized sequentially in 70% ethanol (1 min), 2% sodium hypochlorite (2 min), followed by three rinses with sterile water. Residual moisture was blotted with sterile filter paper. To verify sterilization effectiveness, negative control plants (non-inoculated) were sprayed with the spore suspension (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and immediately subjected to the same sterilization process before plating.
Sterilized tissue samples were cut into 1 × 1 cm fragments, with 10 fragments per stem/leaf sample plated onto PDA (10 plates per plant). Plates were incubated at 26 ± 1 °C in complete darkness for five days and removed daily at 17:00 for fungal growth monitoring under light conditions. Colonization was recorded as positive if characteristic B. bassiana colonies emerged on at least one plate per plant. The colonization rate (%) was calculated as follows: Colonization rate = (Number of fungal-positive plants/Total plants tested) × 100%.

2.6. Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis of T. absoluta Populations Grown on B. bassiana Colonized Tomato Plants

Fifty mated females were confined in mesh cages (50 × 50 × 50 cm) from 20:00 to 24:00 under dark-phase conditions at 10 June 2024, with a tomato plant provided for oviposition. Upon completion of oviposition, the plant bearing eggs was removed, and freshly laid eggs were collected. At 08:00 the following day, 300 eggs were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: (1) BbFS, (2) BbRI, and (3) untreated control, with 100 eggs per group.
Pinnately compound leaves (five primary leaflets) from tomato plants subjected to the corresponding treatments were excised using sterilized scissors and placed in 15 cm Petri dishes with moistened cotton to maintain humidity. One egg was placed on each leaflet, totaling 100 eggs per treatment. Egg and larval development and survival were observed daily at 20:00. Moisture was replenished as needed, and foliage was replaced daily to ensure sufficient feeding.
Upon pupation, pupal sex was determined morphologically, and pupal duration was recorded. Newly emerged adults were paired in a 1:1 ratio within cylindrical plastic chambers (20 cm height × 10 cm diameter) featuring a 1 cm basal aperture. A transparent plastic bowl filled with water was positioned beneath the aperture, with a tomato leaf (from identically treated plants) inserted through the opening so that its petiole remained submerged, preserving turgor for oviposition. Paired adults were provided fresh leaves daily, and fecundity (egg counts) and adult survival were recorded until all individuals had died.

2.7. Life Table Analysis

The life table parameters of T. absoluta were analyzed using the age-stage, two-sex life table method described by Chi, implemented in TWOSEX-MSChart [30]. Age-stage life expectancy (exj), reproductive value (vxj), and intrinsic rate of increase (r) were calculated as per Chi and Liu [31]. The age-specific survival rate (lx) was calculated as follows: l x = j = 0 m s x j . Age-stage specific fecundity (fxj) and age-specific fecundity (mx) were determined using: m x = j = 1 m s x j f x j j = 1 m s x j . The net reproductive rate (R0), representing the expected number of offspring produced per individual, was calculated as: R 0 = x = 0 l x m x . The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was estimated using the Lotka–Euler equation using age indexed from 0 as follows: x = 1 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1 . The finite rate of increase (λ) was determined as: λ = e r . The mean generation time (T), which reflects the time required for a population to increase R0-fold under stable age-stage distribution, was computed as: T = l n R 0 r .

2.8. Data Analysis

All experimental data were organized in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The corrected mortality rate was subjected to arcsine square root transformation before one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess treatment effects. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the LSD’s test, followed by correction of the comparison results with the Bonferroni-Holm method.
LC50 and LT50 were estimated by probit regression in SPSS 23.0, using dose–response and time–mortality regression models, respectively. Life history data for T. absoluta were analyzed within the age-stage, two-sex life table framework using TWOSEX-MSChart [30]. Developmental duration and reproductive parameters (oviposition and fecundity) between B. bassiana-colonized and control plants were compared via one-way ANOVA with LSD’s test, followed by correction of the comparison results with the Bonferroni-Holm method.
To ensure statistical robustness, 100,000 bootstrap resampling iterations were conducted [32], and a paired bootstrap test within TWOSEX-MSChart was used to compare population parameters (R0, λ, r, and T) between host plants.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Strains

PCR amplification of the B. bassiana strains Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, BbC, and BbM yielded fragment sizes of 598, 587, 573, and 575 bp, respectively. These sequences were submitted to the GenBank database for BLAST comparison.
Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the four strains clustered within the same evolutionary branch as the B. bassiana strain (ON796013.1), exhibiting sequence similarities of 99.5%, 99.3%, 99.5%, and 98.6% for Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, BbC, and BbM, respectively (Figure 1). Based on morphological characteristics and rDNA-ITS sequence similarity, the strains were conclusively identified as B. bassiana.

3.2. Evaluation of the Insecticidal Activity of B. bassiana Against Larvae of T. absoluta

All four B. bassiana strains displayed pathogenicity against second-instar T. absoluta larvae at the start of the experiment, though their virulence differed. Among them, Bb1Bm induced the highest larval mortality (57.0%), followed by BbM (55.0%), Bb2Bm (50.0%), and BbC (33.0%) when evaluated 14 days after exposure to 1 × 107 conidia/mL. Despite these differences, larval mortality did not vary significantly among the four strains at this concentration (F = 1.957, p > 0.050) (Table 1).
The LT50 values were also determined (Table 1). BbM exhibited a lower LT50 (8.07 days), indicating the faster mortality induction, compared to Bb1Bm with an LT50 of 8.71 days. The cumulative mortality for Bb2Bm and BbC was insufficient to allow logistic regression fitting, preventing LT50 estimation for these strains.

3.3. Virulence of B. bassiana Bb1Bm Against Larvae of T. absoluta

The corrected mortality rate of second-instar T. absoluta larvae exhibited a dose-dependent response to increasing concentrations of B. bassiana Bb1Bm conidial suspensions. At the highest concentration (1 × 108 spores/mL), larval mortality began to rise significantly from day 7 post-treatment, reaching 61.25% (F = 18.688, p < 0.001), which was significantly higher than at lower concentrations. By day 14, mortality further escalated to 85.00% (F = 16.124, p < 0.001), highlighting the strong virulence of Bb1Bm against T. absoluta larvae (Table 2). These results confirm a pronounced concentration-dependent mycocidal effect of B. bassiana Bb1Bm.

3.4. Colonization of B. bassiana in Tomato Plants

Following surface sterilization, tomato leaves and stems were incubated on selective medium. As shown in Figure 2A, the sterilization protocol effectively eliminated surface microorganisms. After five days, the inoculated strain was successfully re-isolated from tomato leaf (Figure 2B) and stem tissues (Figure 2C), confirming the ability of B. bassiana to establish endophytic colonization within tomato plants. Colonization of Bb1Bm was detected in leaf tissues under both inoculation methods, becoming evident by day 7 post-inoculation (Figure 3). Colonization rates peaked at day 14, reaching 75.00% for foliar spraying and 65.00% for root irrigation. By day 21, the rates decreased to 23.33% and 21.67%, respectively, indicating a gradual decline in fungal persistence within host tissues (Figure 3).

3.5. Developmental Duration, Fecundity, and Offspring Sex Ratio of T. absoluta on Endophytic B. bassiana in Tomato

T. absoluta successfully completed its life cycle when reared on control tomato plants, as well as those treated with B. bassiana via foliar spraying (BbFS) and root irrigation (BbRI). Tomato cultivar significantly influenced pupal duration (F = 4.914, p < 0.010) and adult longevity for both sexes (female: F = 8.840, p < 0.010; male: F = 17.727, p < 0.010). BbFS and BbRI treatments significantly extended pupal development, reduced adult longevity, and markedly decreased female oviposition capacity (F = 6.540, p < 0.010). However, neither treatment had a significant effect on egg or larval duration (Table 3).

3.6. Life Table Analysis

The age-specific survival rate (sxj) of T. absoluta reared on tomato plants treated with BbFS and BbRI is shown in Figure 4. Overlapping survival curves indicate developmental asynchrony among individuals, resulting in distinct stage-specific overlaps. The probability of reaching adulthood was highest in the control group (62.67%, Figure 4A), whereas it dropped significantly in the BbFS (36.00%, Figure 4B) and BbRI (37.14%, Figure 4C) treatments.
The age-stage-specific survival rate (lx), population age-stage-specific fecundity (fx), and age-stage-specific fertility (mx) curves are presented in Figure 5. The lx curve, a simplified representation of the Sxj curve, does not account for individual variation. Compared to the control, the survival curves of T. absoluta under BbFS and BbRI treatments declined sharply between days 5–15, indicating higher mortality rates at larval stage (Figure 5).
The age-specific fecundity (mx) peaked on days 24, 23, and 25 in the control, BbFS, and BbRI treatments, respectively. The highest mx values recorded were 12.8, 6.8, and 10.3, respectively, while female fecundity onset was observed on days 20, 21, and 22 for the control, BbFS, and BbRI treatments, respectively (Figure 5).
The age-stage-specific reproductive value (vxj) of T. absoluta increased significantly upon adult emergence-on day 19 in both the control and BbFS treatments, and on day 21 in the BbRI treatment. As adult lifespan increased, reproductive values gradually declined to zero on days 38, 38, and 44 for the control, BbFS, and BbRI treatments, respectively (Figure 6).
Age-stage life expectancy (exj) represents the expected remaining lifespan of an individual at age x and stage j. As x increases, lifespan gradually declines to zero. The estimated life expectancy at hatching (exj) was 30.23, 22.01, and 23.74 days for T. absoluta reared on control, BbFS, and BbRI-treated plants, respectively (Figure 7).
The control group exhibited significantly higher values (p < 0.05) for net reproductive rate (R0: 44.84 ± 7.93), finite rate of increase (λ: 1.16 ± 0.00), and intrinsic rate of increase (r: 0.15 ± 0.00) compared to both BbFS (R0: 20.53 ± 5.22; λ: 1.13 ± 0.00; r: 0.12 ± 0.01) and BbRI (R0: 25.95 ± 6.22; λ: 1.13 ± 0.01; r: 0.12 ± 0.00) treatments. However, no significant differences in R0, λ, or r were detected between BbFS and BbRI. Additionally, BbRI treatment resulted in a significantly longer mean generation time (T: 26.45 ± 0.51) than both the control (24.85 ± 0.26) and BbFS (24.59 ± 0.46), while no significant difference in T was observed between the control and BbFS (Table 4).

4. Discussion

B. bassiana is one of the earliest described entomopathogenic fungi and remains the most extensively studied and widely applied filamentous pathogen for insect control [33]. It combines broad environmental adaptability, scalable mass production methods, and strong biocontrol potential [33,34]. Its efficacy has been demonstrated against multiple lepidopteran pests, including Spodoptera frugiperda [35], Helicoverpa armigera [36], Plutella xylostella [37], and Spodoptera exigua [38]. In the present study, strain Bb1Bm showed high virulence against T. absoluta larvae, with a corrected mortality of 85.00% at 1 × 108 conidia/mL, identifying it as a promising biocontrol candidate. Although this mortality is substantial, it is slightly lower than the >90% reported for strains LPP139, LEF140, and LEF141 at the same concentration [14], underscoring well-documented strain-specific differences in virulence. Moreover, strains achieving >90% mortality at lower concentrations have been reported (e.g., 1 × 107 conidia/mL) [39], indicating that further strain screening or optimization of Bb1Bm application (e.g., formulation, timing) may improve efficacy.
Endophytic colonization of plants by B. bassiana can promote plant growth and confer antagonism to herbivores [40,41]. We achieved successful colonization of tomato via both foliar spray and root irrigation, with colonization becoming detectable at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) and peaking at 14 dpi before declining. No significant difference in colonization efficiency was observed between inoculation methods (p > 0.05), a temporal pattern consistent with reports of maximal colonization at 14 dpi in tomato under varied inoculation regimes [42]. By contrast, some studies have observed progressive increases in root-inoculated plants reaching near-complete colonization at later time points [40]. Such discrepancies likely reflect strain-and host-specific interactions that govern colonization dynamics [43,44].
Feeding on B. bassiana-colonized tomato plants significantly reduced T. absoluta fitness, manifested as lower pre-adult survival, shortened adult longevity, and decreased fecundity relative to controls (p < 0.05). These effects are consistent with prior reports of reduced larval survival and increased mortality of T. absoluta on colonized tomatoes [14,45]. This extends to other herbivores. For example, impaired survival and reproduction of Trialeurodes vaporariorum nymphs on tomato [46] and reduced performance of Tetranychus urticae on bean [47]. Together, these studies indicate that endophyte-mediated suppression of herbivores is broadly effective across taxa.
Population life-table analyses corroborated the adverse demographic effects of endophytic colonization: net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), and finite rate of increase (λ) were significantly reduced, while mean generation time (T) was prolonged (p < 0.05). These shifts indicate extended development and lower reproductive output on colonized plants, which together impose strong constraints on potential population growth of T. absoluta.
The significantly impaired fitness of T. absoluta on colonized tomatoes likely arises from two complementary plant-mediated mechanisms. First, endophytic colonization can induce or prime plant defense responses, elevating secondary metabolites and other anti-herbivore factors that indirectly reduce pest performance [48]. Examples include upregulation of ZmWRKY36 in colonized maize, which suppresses S. frugiperda growth [49] and altered α-solanine levels in tomato that reduce B. tabaci reproduction [50]. Second, endophytes can secrete bioactive, insecticidal compounds within host tissues [51,52,53], with destruxin A from colonized tomatoes inducing lethality in S. littoralis [19].

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study identifies B. bassiana strain Bb1Bm as a highly virulent candidate for controlling T. absoluta. Life table analysis confirms that both foliar spray and root irrigation treatments significantly reduce T. absoluta population fitness, supporting the potential of B. bassiana as an effective component of integrated pest management strategies. However, the precise mechanisms through which B. bassiana-colonized tomato plants impair T. absoluta fitness, as well as the specific pathways involved, require further investigation.

Author Contributions

B.X.: Writing—original draft, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Methodology, Visualization, C.H.: Writing—review and editing, Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, S.C.: Investigation, Methodology, J.R.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, J.C.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, G.Z. (Guifen Zhang): Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Y.Z.: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, G.Z. (Guohui Zhang): Conceptualization, F.W.: Funding acquisition, Resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (grant numbers 2021YFD1400200, and 2022YFC2601000), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. S2025XM32), and the Project of the Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education (grant numbers KFG202421).

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate Yi Zhou of the College of Agriculture at Yangtze University for providing the Beauveria bassiana strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Costa, J.M.; Heuvelink, E.P. The Global Tomato Industry. In Tomatoes; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2018; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biondi, A.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Wan, F.-H.; Desneux, N. Ecology, Worldwide Spread, and Management of the Invasive South American Tomato Pinworm, Tuta absoluta: Past, Present, and Future. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guedes, R.N.C.; Picanço, M.C. The Tomato Borer Tuta absoluta in South America: Pest Status, Management and Insecticide Resistance. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E.; Wyckhuys, K.A.G.; Burgio, G.; Arpaia, S.; Narváez-Vasquez, C.A.; González-Cabrera, J.; Catalán Ruescas, D.; Tabone, E.; Frandon, J.; et al. Biological Invasion of European Tomato Crops by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, Geographic Expansion and Prospects for Biological Control. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guedes, R.N.C.; Roditakis, E.; Campos, M.R.; Haddi, K.; Bielza, P.; Siqueira, H.A.A.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Vontas, J.; Nauen, R. Insecticide Resistance in the Tomato Pinworm Tuta absoluta: Patterns, Spread, Mechanisms, Management and Outlook. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 1329–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roditakis, E.; Vasakis, E.; García-Vidal, L.; del Rosario Martínez-Aguirre, M.; Rison, J.L.; Haxaire-Lutun, M.O.; Nauen, R.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Bielza, P. A Four-Year Survey on Insecticide Resistance and Likelihood of Chemical Control Failure for Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta in the European/Asian Region. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González-Pérez, E.; Ortega-Amaro, M.A.; Bautista, E.; Delgado-Sánchez, P.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F. The Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae Enhances Arabidopsis, Tomato, and Maize Plant Growth. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 176, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Özkara, A.; Akyıl, D.; Konuk, M.; Özkara, A.; Akyıl, D.; Konuk, M. Pesticides, Environmental Pollution, and Health. In Environmental Health Risk—Hazardous Factors to Living Species; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-953-51-2402-3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pereira, J.L.; Antunes, S.C.; Castro, B.B.; Marques, C.R.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.; Gonçalves, F.; Pereira, R. Toxicity Evaluation of Three Pesticides on Non-Target Aquatic and Soil Organisms: Commercial Formulation versus Active Ingredient. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chandler, D.; Bailey, A.S.; Tatchell, G.M.; Davidson, G.; Greaves, J.; Grant, W.P. The Development, Regulation and Use of Biopesticides for Integrated Pest Management. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 1987–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elhajj, A.K.; Rizk, H.; Gharib, M.; Houssein, M.; Talj, V.; Taha, N.; Aleik, S.; Moussa, Z. Management of Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Using Biopesticides on Tomato Crop under Greenhouse Conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rani, A.T.; Kammar, V.; Keerthi, M.C.; Rani, V.; Majumder, S.; Pandey, K.K.; Singh, J. Biopesticides: An Alternative to Synthetic Insecticides. In Microbial Technology for Sustainable Environment; Bhatt, P., Gangola, S., Udayanga, D., Kumar, G., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 439–466. ISBN 978-981-16-3840-4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rajula, J.; Rahman, A.; Krutmuang, P. Entomopathogenic Fungi in Southeast Asia and Africa and Their Possible Adoption in Biological Control. Biol. Control 2020, 151, 104399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Silva, A.C.L.; Silva, G.A.; Abib, P.H.N.; Carolino, A.T.; Samuels, R.I. Endophytic Colonization of Tomato Plants by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana for Controlling the South American Tomato Pinworm, Tuta absoluta. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2020, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Russo, M.L.; Pelizza, S.A.; Cabello, M.N.; Stenglein, S.A.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic Colonisation of Tobacco, Corn, Wheat and Soybeans by the Fungal Entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota, Hypocreales). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rondot, Y.; Reineke, A. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana in Grapevine Vitis vinifera (L.) Reduces Infestation with Piercing-Sucking Insects. Biol. Control 2018, 116, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pachoute, J.; Nascimento, V.L.; de Souza, D.J. Beauveria bassiana Enhances the Growth of Cowpea Plants and Increases the Mortality of Cerotoma arcuata. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 3762–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vega, F.E. The Use of Fungal Entomopathogens as Endophytes in Biological Control: A Review. Mycologia 2018, 110, 4–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Resquín-Romero, G.; Garrido-Jurado, I.; Delso, C.; Ríos-Moreno, A.; Quesada-Moraga, E. Transient Endophytic Colonizations of Plants Improve the Outcome of Foliar Applications of Mycoinsecticides against Chewing Insects. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 136, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wraight, S.P.; Ramos, M.E.; Avery, P.B.; Jaronski, S.T.; Vandenberg, J.D. Comparative Virulence of Beauveria bassiana Isolates against Lepidopteran Pests of Vegetable Crops. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010, 103, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tarusikirwa, V.L.; Machekano, H.; Mutamiswa, R.; Chidawanyika, F.; Nyamukondiwa, C. Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on the “Offensive” in Africa: Prospects for Integrated Management Initiatives. Insects 2020, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vivekanandhan, P.; Swathy, K.; Sarayut, P.; Patcharin, K. Biology, Classification, and Entomopathogen-Based Management and Their Mode of Action on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in Asia. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1429690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shiberu, T.; Degaga, E. Entomopathogenic Effect of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) and Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Larvae Under Laboratory and Glasshouse Conditions in Ethiopia. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Borgi, I.; Dupuy, J.-W.; Blibech, I.; Lapaillerie, D.; Lomenech, A.-M.; Rebai, A.; Ksantini, M.; Bonneu, M.; Gargouri, A. Hyper-Proteolytic Mutant of Beauveria bassiana, a New Biological Control Agent against the Tomato Borer. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Aynalem, B.; Muleta, D.; Jida, M.; Shemekite, F.; Aseffa, F. Biocontrol Competence of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Bacillus thuringiensis against Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick 1917 under Greenhouse and Field Conditions. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Ghany, N.M.A.; Abdel-Razek, A.S.; Ebadah, I.M.A.; Mahmoud, Y.A. Evaluation of Some Microbial Agents, Natural and Chemical Compounds for Controlling Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Plant Prot. Res. 2016, 56, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ndereyimana, A.; Nyalala, S.; Murerwa, P.; Gaidashova, S. Pathogenicity of Some Commercial Formulations of Entomopathogenic Fungi on the Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamed Mahmoud, F.; Bendebbah, R.; Benssaci, B.; Toudji, F.; Tafifet, L.; Krimi, Z. Entomopathogenic Efficacy of the Endophytic Fungi: Clonostachys Sp. and Beauveria bassiana on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Larvae under Laboratory and Greenhouse Conditions. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2021, 31, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abbott, W.S. A Method of Computing the Effectiveness of an Insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chi, H.; You, M.; Atlıhan, R.; Smith, C.L.; Kavousi, A.; Özgökçe, M.S.; Güncan, A.; Tuan, S.-J.; Fu, J.-W.; Xu, Y.-Y.; et al. Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table: An Introduction to Theory, Data Analysis, and Application. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 40, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two New Methods for Study of Insect Population Ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1984, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  32. Akca, I.; Ayvaz, T.; Yazici, E.; Smith, C.L.; Chi, H. Demography and Population Projection of Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae): With Additional Comments on Life Table Research Criteria. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 1466–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. St Leger, R.; Screen, S. Prospects for Strain Improvement of Fungal Pathogens of Insects and Weeds. In Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems and Potential; CABI Books: Wallingford, UK, 2001; pp. 219–237. ISBN 978-0-85199-356-0. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mascarin, G.M.; Jaronski, S.T. The Production and Uses of Beauveria bassiana as a Microbial Insecticide. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Idrees, A.; Afzal, A.; Qadir, Z.A.; Li, J. Bioassays of Beauveria bassiana Isolates against the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tahir, M.; Wakil, W.; Ali, A.; Sahi, S. Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae Isolates against Larvae of the Polyphagous Pest Helicoverpa armigera. Entomol. Gen. 2018, 38, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Agboyi, L.K.; Ketoh, G.K.; Douro Kpindou, O.K.; Martin, T.; Glitho, I.A.; Tamò, M. Improving the Efficiency of Beauveria bassiana Applications for Sustainable Management of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in West Africa. Biol. Control 2020, 144, 104233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Islam, S.M.N.; Chowdhury, M.Z.H.; Mim, M.F.; Momtaz, M.B.; Islam, T. Biocontrol Potential of Native Isolates of Beauveria bassiana against Cotton Leafworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Aynalem, B.; Muleta, D.; Venegas, J.; Assefa, F. Molecular Phylogeny and Pathogenicity of Indigenous Beauveria bassiana against the Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta Meyrick 1917 (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in Ethiopia. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghaffari, S.; Karimi, J.; Cheniany, M.; Seifi, A.; Loverodge, J.; Butt, T.M. Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungi Enhance Plant Immune Responses against Tomato Leafminer. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2025, 209, 108270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lopez, D.C.; Sword, G.A. The Endophytic Fungal Entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Purpureocillium lilacinum Enhance the Growth of Cultivated Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Negatively Affect Survival of the Cotton Bollworm (Helicoverpa zea). Biol. Control 2015, 89, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wei, Q.-Y.; Li, Y.-Y.; Xu, C.; Wu, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.-R.; Liu, H. Endophytic Colonization by Beauveria bassiana Increases the Resistance of Tomatoes against Bemisia tabaci. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2020, 14, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kasambala Donga, T.; Vega, F.E.; Klingen, I. Establishment of the Fungal Entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana as an Endophyte in Sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 35, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nishi, O.; Sushida, H.; Higashi, Y.; Iida, Y. Epiphytic and Endophytic Colonisation of Tomato Plants by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA. Mycology 2021, 12, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Allegrucci, N.; Velázquez, M.S.; Russo, M.L.; Pérez, M.E.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic Colonisation of Tomato by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana: The Use of Different Inoculation Techniques and Their Effects on the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Plant Prot. Res. 2017, 57, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barra-Bucarei, L.; González, M.G.; Iglesias, A.F.; Aguayo, G.S.; Peñalosa, M.G.; Vera, P.V. Beauveria bassiana Multifunction as an Endophyte: Growth Promotion and Biologic Control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum, (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Tomato. Insects 2020, 11, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dash, C.K.; Bamisile, B.S.; Keppanan, R.; Qasim, M.; Lin, Y.; Islam, S.U.; Hussain, M.; Wang, L. Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungi Enhance the Growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) and Negatively Affect the Development and Reproduction of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shrivastava, G.; Ownley, B.H.; Augé, R.M.; Toler, H.; Dee, M.; Vu, A.; Köllner, T.G.; Chen, F. Colonization by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi Enhanced Terpene Production in Tomato Plants and Their Defense against a Herbivorous Insect. Symbiosis 2015, 65, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Batool, R.; Xuelian, G.; Hui, D.; Xiuzhen, L.; Umer, M.J.; Rwomushana, I.; Ali, A.; Attia, K.A.; Jingfei, G.; Zhenying, W. Endophytic Fungi-Mediated Defense Signaling in Maize: Unraveling the Role of WRKY36 in Regulating Immunity against Spodoptera frugiperda. Physiol. Plant. 2024, 176, e14243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.; Yan, G.; Liu, W.; Chen, H.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana of Tomato Resisted the Damage from Whitefly Bemisia tabaci by Mediating the Accumulation of Plant-Specialized Metabolites. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 13244–13254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bamisile, B.S.; Dash, C.K.; Akutse, K.S.; Keppanan, R.; Wang, L. Fungal Endophytes: Beyond Herbivore Management. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumar, S.; Kaushik, N. Metabolites of Endophytic Fungi as Novel Source of Biofungicide: A Review. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Segaran, G.; Sathiavelu, M. Fungal Endophytes: A Potent Biocontrol Agent and a Bioactive Metabolites Reservoir. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 21, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the B. bassiana strains Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, BbC, and BbM, along with closely related strains, constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method based on ITS sequences. Numbers in parentheses indicate GenBank accession numbers. Bootstrap support values are displayed at each branch point. The scale bar represents a branch length of 0.01.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the B. bassiana strains Bb1Bm, Bb2Bm, BbC, and BbM, along with closely related strains, constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method based on ITS sequences. Numbers in parentheses indicate GenBank accession numbers. Bootstrap support values are displayed at each branch point. The scale bar represents a branch length of 0.01.
Plants 14 02932 g001
Figure 2. Detection of Colonization by B. bassiana in tomato plants: (A) Surface sterilization assessment following inoculation of tomato with B. bassiana. (B) Isolation and screening of endophytic fungi from tomato leaves and stems at 7 days post-inoculation with B. bassiana via foliar spray; (C) Isolation and screening of endophytic fungi from tomato leaves and stems at 7 days post-inoculation with B. bassiana via root irrigation.
Figure 2. Detection of Colonization by B. bassiana in tomato plants: (A) Surface sterilization assessment following inoculation of tomato with B. bassiana. (B) Isolation and screening of endophytic fungi from tomato leaves and stems at 7 days post-inoculation with B. bassiana via foliar spray; (C) Isolation and screening of endophytic fungi from tomato leaves and stems at 7 days post-inoculation with B. bassiana via root irrigation.
Plants 14 02932 g002
Figure 3. Colonization rate of B. bassiana in tomato. (A) BbFS; (B) BbRI. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison).
Figure 3. Colonization rate of B. bassiana in tomato. (A) BbFS; (B) BbRI. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison).
Plants 14 02932 g003
Figure 4. Specific age-stage survival rate (Sxj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Figure 4. Specific age-stage survival rate (Sxj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Plants 14 02932 g004
Figure 5. Specific age-stage survival rate (lx), specific age-stage fecundity (fx), and specific age-stage fecundity of total population (mx) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Figure 5. Specific age-stage survival rate (lx), specific age-stage fecundity (fx), and specific age-stage fecundity of total population (mx) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Plants 14 02932 g005
Figure 6. Specific age-stage reproductive value (vxj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Figure 6. Specific age-stage reproductive value (vxj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Plants 14 02932 g006
Figure 7. Specific age-stage life expectancies (exj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Figure 7. Specific age-stage life expectancies (exj) of T. absoluta that fed on control group tomato (A), BbFS (B), and BbRI (C).
Plants 14 02932 g007
Table 1. Corrected mortality rates and probit regression parameters of four B. bassiana strains against T. absoluta larvae at 1 × 107 spores/mL.
Table 1. Corrected mortality rates and probit regression parameters of four B. bassiana strains against T. absoluta larvae at 1 × 107 spores/mL.
StrainCorrected Mortality Rate (%)Regression EquationR2LT50
(Days)
95% Confidence Interval
Bb1Bm57.00 ± 10.91 aY = 58.781/(1 + Exp(3.142 − 0.560X))0.9568.718.74−10.70
Bb2Bm50.00 ± 4.47 aY = 49.349/(1 + Exp(3.677 − 0.719X))0.995
BbM55.00 ± 9.22 aY = 56.994/(1 + Exp(3.749 − 0.708X))0.9770.9777.21−8.94
BbC33.00 ± 4.36 aY = 36.042/(1 + Exp(3.731 − 0.508X))0.938
Data in the “Corrected mortality rate (%)” column represent mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters in the “Corrected mortality rate (%)” column indicate significant differences within the same column (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison). A dash “—“ indicates failure in fitting due to the relatively low mortality rate.
Table 2. Corrected mortality of the B. bassiana Bb1Bm strain at varying concentrations against T. absoluta larvae.
Table 2. Corrected mortality of the B. bassiana Bb1Bm strain at varying concentrations against T. absoluta larvae.
Spore Concentration (Spores/mL)Corrected Mortality of Larvae at Different Time Points After Infection (%)
3 Days7 Days14 Days
1 × 10810.00 ± 3.78 a61.25 ± 5.32 a85.00 ± 4.43 a
1 × 1077.50 ± 3.66 a34.38 ± 6.37 b57.50 ± 9.11 b
1 × 1065.00 ± 3.27 a29.38 ± 4.36 b38.75 ± 5.32 b,c
1 × 1055.00 ± 3.27 a21.25 ± 3.10 b,c33.75 ± 5.88 b,c
1 × 1042.50 ± 2.50 a5.63 ± 3.71 c18.13 ± 6.19 c
Data in the table represent mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison).
Table 3. Duration of developmental stages and lifetime fecundity (mean ± SE) of T. absoluta on control group tomato, BbFS, and BbRI.
Table 3. Duration of developmental stages and lifetime fecundity (mean ± SE) of T. absoluta on control group tomato, BbFS, and BbRI.
ParametersTreatment
ControlBbFSBbRI
Duration of egg (d)3.89 ± 0.05 a3.96 ± 0.04 a3.96 ± 0.04 a
Duration of 1st instar larval (d)2.68 ± 0.10 a,b2.93 ± 0.13 a2.22 ± 0.08 b
Duration of 2nd instar larval (d)2.51 ± 0.10 b2.68 ± 0.12 b3.30 ± 0.13 a
Duration of 3rd instar larval (d)3.09 ± 0.15 a2.79 ± 0.13 a3.07 ± 0.16 a
Duration of 4th instar larval (d)3.32 ± 0.10 a3.68 ± 0.19 a3.52 ± 0.15 a
Duration of Larva stage (d)11.60 ± 0.18 a12.07 ± 0.21 a12.11 ± 0.26 a
Duration of Pupa stage (d)5.94 ± 0.16 b6.11 ± 0.25 a,b6.78 ± 0.19 a
Adult female longevity (d)18.48 ± 0.72 a12.20 ± 1.36 b13.27 ± 1.63 b
Adult male longevity (d)17.13 ± 0.86 a9.08 ± 1.20 b11.25 ± 1.19 b
Number of eggs laid per female147.82 ± 4.99 a112.07 ± 8.92 b124.79 ± 9.60 b
Data are mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison).
Table 4. Population parameters (mean ± SE) of T. absoluta fed on B. bassiana-colonized tomato and control group.
Table 4. Population parameters (mean ± SE) of T. absoluta fed on B. bassiana-colonized tomato and control group.
ParametersTreatment
ControlBbFSBbRI
Net reproductive rate (R0)44.84 ± 7.93 a20.53 ± 5.22 b25.95 ± 6.22 b
Finite rate of increase (λ)1.16 ± 0.00 a1.13 ± 0.00 b1.13 ± 0.01 b
Intrinsic rate of increase (r)0.15 ± 0.00 a0.12 ± 0.01 b0.12 ± 0.00 b
Mean generation time (T)24.85 ± 0.26 b24.59 ± 0.46 b26.45 ± 0.51 a
Data are mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters within the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD’s multiple range comparison).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, B.; Huang, C.; Cheng, S.; Romeis, J.; Collatz, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wan, F. Screening of Highly Virulent Beauveria bassiana Strains Against Tuta absoluta Larvae and Evaluation of Their Endophytic Colonization-Mediated Suppression in Tomato Plants. Plants 2025, 14, 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182932

AMA Style

Xu B, Huang C, Cheng S, Romeis J, Collatz J, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Wan F. Screening of Highly Virulent Beauveria bassiana Strains Against Tuta absoluta Larvae and Evaluation of Their Endophytic Colonization-Mediated Suppression in Tomato Plants. Plants. 2025; 14(18):2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Bo, Cong Huang, Sheng Cheng, Jörg Romeis, Jana Collatz, Guifen Zhang, Yibo Zhang, Guohui Zhang, and Fanghao Wan. 2025. "Screening of Highly Virulent Beauveria bassiana Strains Against Tuta absoluta Larvae and Evaluation of Their Endophytic Colonization-Mediated Suppression in Tomato Plants" Plants 14, no. 18: 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182932

APA Style

Xu, B., Huang, C., Cheng, S., Romeis, J., Collatz, J., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., & Wan, F. (2025). Screening of Highly Virulent Beauveria bassiana Strains Against Tuta absoluta Larvae and Evaluation of Their Endophytic Colonization-Mediated Suppression in Tomato Plants. Plants, 14(18), 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop