Next Article in Journal
Plants from Bulgarian Botanical Gardens: Some Selected Species with Potential for Health Food and Medical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Iminosugars of the Invasive Arboreal Amorpha fruticosa and Glycosidase Inhibition Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of As from Tambo River Using Sodium Alginate from Lessonia trabeculata (Aracanto)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Allelopathy and Identification of Allelochemicals in the Leaves of Hakea decurrens subsp. physocarpa W.R. Barker
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Invasive Mechanism and Impact of Arundo donax, One of the World’s 100 Worst Invasive Alien Species

Department of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki 761-0795, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(14), 2175; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142175
Submission received: 17 June 2025 / Revised: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 10 July 2025 / Published: 14 July 2025

Abstract

Arundo donax L. has been introduced in markets worldwide due to its economic value. However, it is listed in the world’s 100 worst alien invasive species because it easily escapes from cultivation, and forms dense monospecific stands in riparian areas, agricultural areas, and grassland areas along roadsides, including in protected areas. This species grows rapidly and produces large amounts of biomass due to its high photosynthetic ability. It spreads asexually through ramets, in addition to stem and rhizome fragments. Wildfires, flooding, and human activity promote its distribution and domination. It can adapt to various habitats and tolerate various adverse environmental conditions, such as cold temperatures, drought, flooding, and high salinity. A. donax exhibits defense mechanisms against biotic stressors, including herbivores and pathogens. It produces indole alkaloids, such as bufotenidine and gramine, as well as other alkaloids that are toxic to herbivorous mammals, insects, parasitic nematodes, and pathogenic fungi and oomycetes. A. donax accumulates high concentrations of phytoliths, which also protect against pathogen infection and herbivory. Only a few herbivores and pathogens have been reported to significantly damage A. donax growth and populations. Additionally, A. donax exhibits allelopathic activity against competing plant species, though the allelochemicals involved have yet to be identified. These characteristics may contribute to its infestation, survival, and population expansion in new habitats as an invasive plant species. Dense monospecific stands of A. donax alter ecosystem structures and functions. These stands impact abiotic processes in ecosystems by reducing water availability, and increasing the risk of erosion, flooding, and intense fires. The stands also negatively affect biotic processes by reducing plant diversity and richness, as well as the fitness of habitats for invertebrates and vertebrates. Eradicating A. donax from a habitat requires an ongoing, long-term integrated management approach based on an understanding of its invasive mechanisms. Human activity has also contributed to the spread of A. donax populations. There is an urgent need to address its invasive traits. This is the first review focusing on the invasive mechanisms of this plant in terms of adaptation to abiotic and biotic stressors, particularly physiological adaptation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Arundo donax L., belonging to the Poaceae family, is a perennial cane grass commonly known as a giant reed, giant cane, Spanish cane, bamboo reed, and many other local names. Its stem (culm) grows to a height of 3–9 m, and its hollow internodes are 2–20 cm long and 1.5–3.5 cm in diameter. The stems become woody and develop branches from axillary buds at the nodes with maturity. The leaves are distichous phyllotaxis, measuring 30–80 cm in length and 2–12 cm in width. They have glabrous sheaths that split to the leaf bases, and membranous leaf ligules. The sheaths tightly envelop the stem from the base of the leaf to the next lower node [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The membranous leaf ligules are one of the features that distinguish this species apart from similar Phragmites species [5]. This species has well-developed rhizomes. The rhizomes are horizontal, 3.5–5 cm thick, and solid, forming a dense network. Each stem has a lifespan of three to four years. However, the rhizomes survive and continuously produce ramets that grow into new shoots with leaves and stems [5,6,7] (Figure 1).
Since ancient times, A. donax has been cultivated throughout the Mediterranean Basin, the Middle East, and South and East Asia. It has been used to make woodwind reeds, furniture, and household items, such as baskets, containers, and mats. It has also been used for construction materials and agricultural structures, including for those that support orchards and crops [5,7]. Genetic and morphological analyses have identified A. donax as an invasive archaeophyte in the Mediterranean Basin. Populations of A. donax in the Middle East and in South and East Asia exhibit significant genetic and morphological variation. In contrast, populations of A. donax in the Mediterranean Basin exhibit lower genetic and morphological variation [5,7,8,9,10]. The chromosome number of A. donax has been reported to be approximately 108 (2n = 18x) in the populations from the Mediterranean Basin, and 72 (2n = 12x) in the populations from the Middle East [11,12,13]. Defective development of the female and male gametophytes has been observed in the populations from the Mediterranean Basin, resulting in sterility [12,14,15]. Therefore, A. donax is thought to be native to the Middle East and South and East Asia. The ploidy level of A. donax has also been reported as 2n = 7x = 84 in Australian populations [16], and 3n = 9x = 108 (autoalloenneaploid) in Chinese populations [17,18]. Further global-scale investigations into the chromosomes of this species may be imperative.
European colonialists widely introduced A. donax from the Mediterranean Basin to tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate areas around the world [2,5,7]. It was introduced to North America in the early 1500s for textile production. By the early 1800s, it had spread to California for applications in erosion control and windbreaks. It was introduced to South Africa for applications in erosion control in the 1700s, and to Australia in the 1800s [2,19,20,21]. In addition to its economic benefits, A. donax has ornamental value, and the potential to produce bioenergy [22,23,24,25]. It has already been distributed over 100 countries in the tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate regions of Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Oceania [2,5,7,26].
However, A. donax easily escapes from cultivation during high-water events, such as flooding. It also escapes through human activities. It forms dense monospecific stands in riparian habitats, including floodplains, streams, and channels. It also grows in agricultural areas and along roadsides and hillsides, including protected areas [2,5,7,21]. In Europe, A. donax populations are found in countries ranging from the Mediterranean region to Germany [22]. In North America, populations are distributed across 39 U.S. states, ranging from California to New York, and from Texas to northern Portland, as well as in Hawaii. They are also found across 27 states in Mexico [27,28]. Infestations are estimated to cover 6400 and 8400 hectares in the Rio Grande Basin in Texas and in Mexico, respectively, and 4100 hectares in California [29,30,31]. Currently, A. donax has been found along the entire river channels, from bank to bank, in the coastal river basins in Southern California [32]. A. donax is considered to be one of the worst invasive plants because of the risks it poses to native flora and fauna. It is listed among the world’s 100 worst invasive alien species [33] (Figure 2).
Management strategies for A. donax have been reviewed and summarized in detail [5,7]. Control measures include chemical, physical, mechanical, biological, and ecological methods. Eradicating the species from these infested areas seems difficult, and relying solely on the existing methods is unsafe and unsustainable at the ecosystem level [7,34,35]. Restoring the flora and fauna, which negatively impacted by A. donax, is also difficult [36,37]. Long-term, continuous integrated management programs utilizing new technology are necessary to eradicate A. donax. Understanding the biology of the species may be a key to controlling it [38,39]. The life history traits of several invasive plant species have been studied to understand their invasion mechanisms. These mechanisms include growth and reproductive capabilities, as well as their adaptive abilities in response to abiotic and biotic stressors [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Understanding the invasion mechanisms of A. donax is also important for the long-term integrated weed management programs.
This review provides an overview of the growth and reproductive capacity of A. donax, and its adaptability to abiotic and biotic stressors. It also discusses the impact of A. donax on abiotic and biotic ecosystem processes.

2. Literature Survey

A combination of major online search engines was used to review the literature: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The following terms were searched in combination with Arundo donax: invasion, ecology, distribution, impact, genetic variation, growth, reproduction, habitat, adaptation, flooding, temperature, drought, salinity, herbivory, pathogens, allelopathy, toxicity, and alkaloids. We discuss the identified papers as thoroughly as possible. We excluded those with unclear methods.

3. Life History Traits of Arundo donax

3.1. Growth

A. donax is known for its rapid growth. It can grow 2.6–10 cm per day, making it one of the fastest-growing terrestrial plants [48,49]. A. donax is a C3 plant with a photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rate of 33–38 μmol m−2 s−1 under optimal conditions [50,51,52,53]. This rate exceeds the standard value of 18–20 μmol m−2 s−1 for C3 plants [54]. The high photosynthetic ability of A. donax may be due to its ability to absorb high levels of irradiance for the electron transport saturation, and its high levels for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP)-limited and RuBP-saturated photosynthesis [55,56].
It has been estimated that A. donax produces 125 tons of above-ground biomass (dry weight) per hectare in one growing season in Australia [57]; 23–172 tons of above-ground biomass in Western and Southeastern U.S. [58,59,60,61]; 36–167 tons of above-ground biomass in India [62]; 22–137 tons of above-ground biomass in the Nile Delta in Egypt [63]. Estimates of European populations range from 15 to 63 tons of above-ground biomass in Spain [64,65]; 5 to 51 tons in Italy [66,67,68]; 20 to 25 tons in France [22]; 7 to 26 tons in Germany [22]; 7 to 22 tons in Greece [69]; 13 to 53 tons in Turkey [70,71]. Production in European populations was lower than in other areas. Different levels of solar irradiation and temperature may be important factors in determining total above-ground biomass [72,73]. Therefore, A. donax grows rapidly and produces large amounts of biomass. One reason for this is its high photosynthetic ability.

3.2. Reproduction and Establishment

The flowering of A. donax is either regular or irregular, depending on the environment and population. The panicles, 30–80 cm long and 5–30 cm wide, are generated at the end of the stems (culms), and contain a large number of spikelets. The spikelets are 10–15 mm long and have two to four bisexual florets. However, the populations in the Mediterranean region, USA, Australia, and India have not been observed to produce viable seeds [12,16,74,75,76,77]. Defective development of the female and male gametophytes, including failure of the meiotic processes of these gametophytes, has been observed in these populations, causing sterility [12,14,78]. Viable seeds of A. donax have been reported in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran [79], and the germination of seeds from Chinese populations has also been observed [80,81]. However, detailed information on the production and germination of viable seeds of A. donax in its native ranges is limited. According to the genetic and ecological analyses, some A. donax populations in central Mexico were implied to reproduce sexually [82]. The seed production and germination processes of A. donax still need to be investigated globally in the future (Figure 3).
A. donax spreads asexually through ramet sprouting [5,7,31]. New ramets arise from adventitious buds at the nodes of rhizomes (Figure 3). In California, individual A. donax plants were observed to expand by 0.3–0.5 m per year via rhizome ramets. A. donax populations expanded by 4.7 hectares per year through rhizome ramets [83]. When A. donax stems come into contact with the soil due to some environmental conditions, such as flooding or strong winds, ramets and nodal roots emerge from the adventitious buds at stem nodes. Independent clonal plants form when the rooted nodes detach from the mother plants due to the death of the layering stems. Expansion by layering stems was 7.4 times faster than rhizome expansion [83]. These vegetative reproductions may contribute to the horizontal expansion and the formation of the dense monospecific stands.
Stem and rhizome fragmentation of A. donax is often observed following flooding and other disturbance to its stands [2,31]. If the fragments contain at least one node, they can easily sprout ramets and establish new stands. However, the ability to sprout is affected by temperature, moisture, and the time since fragmentation [84,85,86]. Reproduction through fragmentation contributes to the long-distance expansion of A. donax populations. Following significant flooding, the populations expanded into coastal river basins in Southern California [31,87]. A molecular analysis of A. donax populations along the Santa Ana River in California suggested that most of these populations were spread along the river via vegetative reproduction [88]. Similarly, A. donax populations in Southern Australia spread along rivers via vegetative reproduction [16]. Rhizome fragments establish A. donax populations much more frequently than stem fragments [89]. Following flooding, 57% of the vegetative reproduction along the Santa Margarita River originated from rhizome fragments. Of that, 33% came from stem fragments. The remaining 7% could not be identified [90]. Populations of A. donax have also increased due to stem and rhizome fragmentation caused by human activity, such as the use of bulldozers and other equipment. It is also an escaped garden plant [91,92]. Dumping garden waste along roads, canals, and field borders is a recognized method by which A. donax spreads [91,92]. Most of the invasive populations in Southern California have been identified as the result of plants escaping or being displaced from commercial plantations and horticultural propagation. These plants then spread along rivers and roads via vegetative propagules [31].
The reestablishment of A. donax after a wildfire was observed on 300 hectares of riparian forest along the Santa Clara River in Southern California. The plant sprouted from its rhizomes shortly after the fire, and reached heights of up to 2.3 m within three months. In contrast, the emergence of native woody riparian plants was not observed for two months after the fire. One year later, the density of the A. donax population was 20 times higher than that of the native woody plants [48]. Wildfires have also been observed to promote the spread of A. donax into native riparian habitats in the Central Valley and coastal watersheds of California [93,94]. Therefore, wildfires promote A. donax infestation by replacing native vegetation with A. donax-dominant vegetation.
A. donax expands its stands horizontally, and forms dense monospecific stands through the ramets from the adventitious buds of its rhizomes, and layering stems. Reproduction through stem and rhizome fragments, which are generated by flooding and human activity, contributes to the long-distance expansion of A. donax populations. Wildfires also promote the spread of A. donax into native vegetation and its domination.

4. Adaptation of Arundo donax to Abiotic Stress

A. donax adapts to tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate climates. It grows in gravelly soils, coarse sands, clays, and river sediments. It inhabits areas ranging from well-drained soils to moist soils, including those where the water table is near the surface. It also grows in areas with freshwater–semi-saline water. The pH of these soils ranges from 5.0 to 8.7 [2,95]. A. donax maintains high biomass production under conditions of low soil nutrient availability [96]. The plant grows in coastal river basins, thickets, estuaries, and on sand dunes near seashores. It grows along riverbanks, in lakes, on floodplains, in agricultural areas, in irrigation canals, along field borders, in grasslands, along roadsides and hillsides, in open forests, and in other moist disturbed areas [2,91,97] (Figure 2). It is cultivated as an ornamental and industrial crop in gardens and fields [31,98]. Therefore, A. donax grows in a wide range of habitats. It is also tolerant of various abiotic stresses such as cold temperatures, drought, flooding, and salinity.

4.1. Cold Temperature

A. donax thrives in temperatures ranging from approximately 10 to 30 °C. It does not grow well in areas with winter frost. Its above-ground parts die in cold temperatures. However, A. donax can survive cold temperatures by maintaining its underground parts such as rhizomes and roots. Is sprouts ramets from the axillary buds at the rhizome nodes when the temperature becomes adequate [2,22,31,91,97]. It has been reported that A. donax can survive at temperatures as low as −10 °C if it is acclimated to 10 °C for at least one week. During this time, its total soluble sugar concentration increases, giving it tolerance [99]. The global warming trend may further expand the A. donax populations northward in the Northern Hemisphere and southward in the Southern Hemisphere [100].

4.2. Drought

A. donax grows in areas ranging from highly humid to dry, with long drought periods, and with annual precipitation ranging from 300 to 4000 mm [2,101]. The species adapts to the drought stress conditions through morphological and physiological changes. Under these conditions, A. donax produces small thick leaves, but does not reduce its leaf number [102,103]. Smaller leaves have lower water consumption and transpiration rates. This results in higher water-use efficiency than that of larger leaves [104,105,106]. Water-use efficiency is the ratio of total biomass production to total water consumption. Under conditions of 20% available water, A. donax increased the water-use efficiency index by 1.5-fold compared to the control treatment [103]. Under drought stress conditions, A. donax also reduces above-ground biomass rather than below-ground biomass for its survival [102,103]. Some A. donax ecotypes have reduced xylem vessel size and impaired water transport, enabling the plants to grow under moderate drought conditions [106].
Under drought stress conditions, A. donax reduces the osmotic potential of its leaves; however, their water content does not differ from that of control leaves [103]. This suggests that the lower osmotic potential was due to the osmotic adjustment through solute accumulation [107,108]. Osmotic adjustment contributes to the maintenance of turgor in cells and plant vigor under drought conditions [109].
Drought stress increases the production of in the different cellular compartments, such as chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes. This results in extensive cellular damage and death. Since solar light energy is received and transferred to light-harvesting systems (photosystems I and II) on the chloroplast thylakoid membranes, chloroplasts are the main cellular sites for ROS production [110]. Under drought conditions, A. donax reduces ROS production by effectively controlling stomatal conductance through an increase in the content of the plant hormone ABA in the leaves [111,112]. Drought stress was found to not seriously damage the photosynthetic apparatus of A. donax, allowing it to maintain photosynthesis [103]. These morphological and physiological changes in A. donax may be adaptations that increase water-use efficiency and survival under drought stress conditions.

4.3. Flooding

A. donax often suffers from waterlogging conditions in the riparian habitats during high-water events, including flooding. This results in a low oxygen condition (hypoxia) for the roots and rhizomes of A. donax [113]. Under stress conditions, A. donax switches from aerobic respiration to alternate anaerobic respiration [113,114]. This process produces supplemental energy [115,116,117,118] and enables A. donax to grow [119]. Intensive oxygen deprivation reduces the growth and photosynthesis of A. donax. However, the re-oxygenation rapidly restores its physiological functions [119]. Prolonged waterlogging has also been shown to induce aerenchyma development in the roots of A. donax [113,120]. Aerenchyma forms in the roots and shoots of wetland species under low-oxygen conditions. Root aerenchyma delivers oxygen to the root tips and contributes to their survival under these conditions [121,122]. These physiological and morphological adaptations to waterlogging stress likely explain why monospecific A. donax stands are so widespread in wetlands, which frequently experience waterlogging conditions.

4.4. Salinity

Salinity stress negatively affects plant growth and photosynthesis. It can even cause death [123,124,125]. A. donax exhibited decreases its growth and biomass production as salinity increases; however, the plants show high tolerance to salinity stress conditions [102,126,127]. At a salinity level of 12 dS m−1, A. donax growth decreased by 50% compared to the control. Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rates were maintained at 7–12 μmol m−2 s−1 under salinity levels of 38–42 dS m−1. These rates are 18–36% of those under optimal conditions (33–38 μmol m−2 s−1) [50,53,102,111,126]. Its mortality rate was not recorded, even at high salinity levels [128,129,130,131]. Soils are classified as saline when their electrical conductivity exceeds 4 dS m−1, which is equivalent to 40 mM of sodium chloride, generating an osmotic pressure of approximately 0.2 MPa. The electrical conductivity of seawater is 20–50 dS m−1 [132]. Therefore, A. donax exhibited relatively high growth and photosynthetic capacity under high-salinity conditions.
Salinity stress is primarily caused by the osmotic effect of the salt around plant roots. This results in the temporary loss of water in leaf cells, producing effects similar to those of drought stress [123,124,125]. In A. donax, salinity stress induces stomatal closure to decrease transpiration by increasing ABA synthesis. Stress also increases sucrose production and gene expression related to carbohydrate metabolism in A. donax leaves [133]. Sucrose may counteract the increase in osmotic potential caused by salinity stress, thereby decreasing it. Stress also increases zeaxanthin content in the leaves [133]. Zeaxanthin is a carotenoid and yellow pigment that acts as a light energy modulator and a photochemical quenching molecule [134,135]. Thus, zeaxanthin protects A. donax against the oxidative stress caused by salinity, including ROS production, as described in Section 4.2. A. donax is well adapted to coastal riparian environments, where salinity levels are often high due to tidal waves. Consequently, some authors have categorized A. donax as a halophyte due to its salinity tolerance [136,137,138].

5. Adaptation of Arundo donax to Biotic Stresses

Biotic stressors affect the germination, growth, development, and reproduction of plants. These stressors include herbivores, pathogens, and competing plant species. These stressors exert significant selective pressure on plant survival, abundance, and distribution [139,140,141,142,143,144]. Several invasive plant species have been documented to exhibit defense responses, and these defensive mechanisms likely contribute to increasing their populations and distribution in the introduced range [145,146,147,148]. A. donax has also been reported to exhibit toxic activity against various biotic stressors.

5.1. Defensive Response Against Herbivores and Pathogens

The first reports of A. donax poisoning occurred in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and mice (Mus musculus). The main active component responsible for the toxicity was identified as bufotenidine, an indole alkaloid. Administrating 10 mg kg−1 of bufotenidine caused the sudden death in mice and the ataxia in rats [149]. Bufotenidine acts as a selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor blocker. These receptors are involved in a wide range of functions, including those of the central nervous system. Blocking these receptors causes various adverse physiological and behavioral changes in mammals [150,151,152,153] (Figure 4). However, the distribution and concentration of bufotenidine in A. donax remains unknown.
As another indole alkaloid, gramine has been identified in the leaves, flowers, and rhizomes of A. donax [149,154,155] (Figure 4). A dosage of over 0.3 g kg−1 of gramine was found to decrease the feed intake and body weight gain of rats [156]. Gramine exhibits insecticidal activity against various herbivorous insects, including aphids (Rhopalosiphum padi and Sitobion avenae), the European elm bark beetle (Scolytus multistriatus), the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens), and the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) [157,158,159,160]. Gramine has been demonstrated to have antifungal activity against the pathogen Fusarium graminearum [161]. Additionally, the extracts of A. donax and gramine induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde and catalase activity, while decreasing superoxide dismutase in the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa [162,163]. These results suggest that the extracts and gramine induce oxidative stress in Microcystis aeruginosa. M. aeruginosa causes toxic blooms [164,165]. The concentration of gramine in the shoots of A. donax was found to be 17.3 nmol g−1 of fresh A. donax weight [166]. However, the mechanism by which gramine exerts its toxic effects remains unclear.
Several other alkaloids were found in A. donax [167,168]. One of these alkaloids, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-N,N-bis(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-cyclobutane-1,3-diimine, exhibited antifeedant activity against the boll weevil Anthonomus grandis [169,170] (Figure 4). Extracts of A. donax increased the mortality of caddisfly larvae, Lepidostoma unicolor [171], and the intestinal parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus [172]. The extracts also inhibited the growth of the oomycete pathogen Pythium ultimum [173]. Pythium ultimum infests a wide range of the host plants, causing root rot and damping-off diseases [174,175]. However, the active components responsible for these toxic effects have not yet been identified.
In addition, A. donax accumulates high concentrations of phytoliths, which are microscopic amorphous silica particles, in its leaves and stems [176,177]. Plant roots absorb silicon (Si) as monosilicic acid (H4SiO4) from groundwater. The vascular system then carries the monosilicic acids to different parts of the plant, where phytoliths form through a process called biosilicification [178,179,180]. Phytoliths in the plant tissues play a defensive role against fungal pathogen infections and herbivory by insects and mammals [181,182]. Thus, the phytoliths contribute to the survival of A. donax from pathogen infection and herbivory.
Furthermore, only a limited number of herbivores and pathogens affecting A. donax have been reported, and the specific damage they cause is unclear [2,31,183]. Moderate–low levels of leaf damage and defoliation alone do not significantly impact the survival or growth of A. donax. These levels of damage may not reduce the A. donax population in a given habitat [184]. Therefore, herbivores and pathogens may not significantly impact the growth and population of A. donax. Toxic substances, including bufotenidine, gramine, other alkaloids, and phytoliths may contribute to the plant’s defenses against herbivores and pathogens.

5.2. Defensive Response Against Competing Plant Species

Many invasive plant species have been reported to inhibit the germination and growth of competing plants through allelopathy, which involves the release of allelochemicals [185,186,187,188,189]. This suppression of neighboring plants gives these invasive plants an advantage in acquiring resources, such as light, water, and nutrients. These plants synthesize and store allelochemicals in various parts of the plant, including the leaves, stems, and rhizomes. They release these allelochemicals into neighboring environments as necessary [190,191,192,193,194,195,196]. The allelopathic activity of A. donax was determined using its extracts. Aqueous extracts of A. donax leaves suppressed the germination and growth of Lens culinaris under laboratory and greenhouse conditions [197]. Aqueous extracts of A. donax leaves and rhizomes suppressed the growth of the grass species Megathyrsus maximus, and five woody species, Pseudobombax tomentosum (Malvaceae), Guazuma ulmifolia (Sterculiaceae), and Parkia platycephala (Malvaceae), Eriotheca pubescens (Malvaceae), and Handroanthus impetiginosus (Bignoniaceae). The inhibitory activity of the leaf extracts was greater than that of the rhizome extracts [198]. However, the allelochemicals responsible for this activity have not yet been identified.
Additionally, methanol extracts from the above-ground parts of A. donax inhibited the growth of the haptophyte Prymnesium parvum, and gramine was identified as a toxic substance in the extracts [199]. P. parvum causes toxic algal blooms [200]. Gramine inhibited the growth of P. parvum with 50% growth inhibition values of 2.78 μg mL−1. Gramine also suppressed the growth of the raphidophyte Chattonella marina, which is associated with red tides [201], as well as the green alga Desmodesmus armatus [202].
Based on these observations, A. donax appears to exhibit allelopathic activity. Identifying the allelochemicals of A. donax will be necessary in the future to understand its defensive response against competing plant species. A. donax is also toxic to certain alga species, including haptophytes, raphidophytes, and green algae. Gramine also exhibited toxicity toward these algae. However, the ecological significance of this toxicity remains unclear.

6. Impacts of Arundo donax on Abiotic and Biotic Ecosystem Processes

A. donax forms dense monospecific stands in riparian areas, such as floodplains, riverbanks, streams, and channels, including those in protected areas. This alters the structure and function of these ecosystems, including their abiotic and biotic components [2,5].

6.1. Impacts on Abiotic Ecosystem Processes

The estimated water consumption was 9.1 mm per day for the A. donax populations in the Rio Grande Basin in Texas, and 41.1 mm per day for the populations in Southern California [31,203]. Along the Nueces River in Texas, the water uptake of A. donax populations was 7.2% higher than that of the native grass species Panicum virgatum, which was displaced by A. donax infestation [204]. The A. donax population (405 hectares) along the Santa Margarita River in California consumes 1100 mm of water per year, which is equivalent to the annual consumption of a downstream community of 20,000 inhabitants [19]. Therefore, A. donax infestations reduce river flow and the amount of available water for residents, agriculture, and industry.
The stem density of A. donax has been reported to range from 17 to 400 stems per m2, with an average of 130 stems per m2 in California watersheds [205], and 63 stems per m2 along the Russian River in California [206]. The dense stands of A. donax within streams affect water movement, disturb irrigation systems, and increase stream sedimentation. This narrows the channels and increases flood risk [207,208].
The woody plant species Salix laevigata used to dominate the riverbanks along the lower Santa Clara River in California. However, an A. donax infestation occurred. The two species have significantly different belowground architectures. S. laevigata has much stronger and deeper roots than A. donax. The root tensile strength of S. laevigata is five times higher. Banks with S. laevigata are more than twice as stable as banks with A. donax. Therefore, A. donax weakens the stability of the river and channel banks and increases erosion during high-flow events [207]. Additionally, A. donax collapses into rivers and channels during these events. Large masses of debris plug bridges and form sandbars and dams. This prevents flood control structures from functioning properly and increases flood risk [205,207,209].
Due to its lower moisture content, higher surface-to-volume ratio, and dense biomass, including senescent and dead stems, A. donax increases fuel load and fire risk and intensity [19,210,211]. The frequency of wildfires is positively correlated with the areas occupied by A. donax [31,61]. It is also believed that A. donax modifies the microclimate of its infested areas by raising temperatures and reducing dissolved oxygen levels in the water. Unlike native forests, A. donax stands do not form a canopy. This allows direct solar irradiation of the water surface, and affects the climate [5,19]. However, detailed climate information, including solar irradiation in the A. donax-infested areas, is unavailable.
As described herein, A. donax has negative impacts on the hydrology and geographical features of infested areas. These effects include reduced water availability, increased erosion and flooding, and increased fire risk and intensity in riparian areas.

6.2. Impacts on Biotic Ecosystem Processes

A. donax outcompetes native plant species and forms its dominant vegetation. Dense monospecific stands of A. donax threaten the native flora in infested habitats. Compared to uninfested areas, A. donax significantly reduces plant diversity [31,212,213,214,215,216]. The presence of dense A. donax stands also results in a significant lack of understory vegetation. In coastal Southern California watersheds, A. donax has been observed displacing all vegetation, including shrubs and herbs except mature tall trees [31]. A. donax has replaced Salix laevigata forests along the lower Santa Clara River in California [208], and Panicum virgatum grasslands along the Nueces River in Texas [204]. In California, A. donax endangers protected plant species in riparian areas, such as Ambrosia pumila, Arenaria paludicola, Atriplex coronata var. notatior, and Berberis nevinii [31]. As described in Section 6.1, fire and flood events are exacerbated by A. donax infestation. Following these events, the removal of riparian vegetation leads to the dominance of A. donax and alters plant succession patterns [94]. The A. donax population also expands through stem and rhizome fragments along riverbanks after flooding as described in Section 3.2. These positive feedback loops may contribute to the dominance of A. donax.
Replacing native vegetation with A. donax also alters the structure and function of ecosystems. Dense monospecific stands of A. donax negatively impact fauna by affecting the food availability, nesting opportunities, movement, and the food chain and trophic level modifications. A. donax infestation endangers several protected amphibians, fish, birds, mammals, and other invertebrates and vertebrates [31,216].
The abundance and diversity of ants and beetles were much lower in A. donax-dominant vegetation than in native vegetation along the Rio Grande Basin in Texas [217,218]. The abundance and taxonomic richness of aerial invertebrates, as well as that measured with the Shannon Index (which indicates species richness and evenness within a community), were twice as high in the native riparian vegetation as in the A. donax-dominant vegetation at Sonoma Creek in California. Insects recorded in A. donax vegetation rarely exhibit feeding activity [219]. The abundance and species composition of arthropods in A. donax-dominant vegetation was significantly lower than in native vegetation in riparian areas across Mediterranean rivers in Spain due to poor understory vegetation and litter accumulation. Some entire trophic groups have even been lost in A. donax-dominated vegetation areas [220]. The greater species diversity and abundance of arthropods in native riparian vegetation compared to A. donax-dominant vegetation may be due to the greater habitat structure, including thick litter layers, and the higher-quality food availability. A. donax produces a large amount of biomass. However, it provides limited food availability and a short food chain, which significantly impacts invertebrate populations. Additionally, the number of non-native invertebrate species associated with A. donax infestation increased [221].
The presence of A. donax creates physical barriers that disturb the movement of amphibians between the riparian habitats and upland habitats. Since amphibians transform from aquatic larvae into air-breathing adults; so, migration from aquatic to upland environments is necessary. A. donax endangers protected species of amphibians, such as the arroyo toad (Bufo californicus) and the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) in the riparian areas in California [31,222].
A. donax endangers fish species, such as the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the northern tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) in California riparian areas [31]. As discussed in Section 6.1, A. donax affects water movement in terms of hydrology and geomorphology. As mentioned in Section 5.2, the plant produces toxic substances that can contaminate water through the residue. These alterations to hydrology and geomorphology, as well as the presence of these toxic substances, may affect fish populations.
The abundance and species richness of birds in California riparian areas decreased as A. donax increased [223]. This invasive species endangers several protected bird species, including the least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) [31,216]. Nesting opportunities for the least Bell’s vireo in A. donax stands were less than 1% of those in native shrub and tree vegetation, such as Salix laevigata and Baccharis salicifolia. The physical structure of A. donax, such as its branching, differs greatly from that of native shrubs and trees [31]. The impact of A. donax on birds may be due to its physical structure, and the reduction in available invertebrates for food. The detection of carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) and bobcats (Lynx rufus), is significantly lower in A. donax dominated habitats than in native habitats in the Santa Clara River Valley in California, due to limited movement and hunting opportunities for small animals [224]. A. donax has complicated effects on herbivorous mammals. While A. donax stands may provide hiding places from carnivores, food resources are lower compared to native plants due to a lack of seeds and low-quality forage [224].
An A. donax infestation significantly reduces plant diversity and richness. It also alters the structure and function of ecosystems, decreasing the fitness of habitats for invertebrates and vertebrates, including arthropods, amphibians, fish, birds, and mammals. This decrease in fitness leads to a reduction in species diversity and richness. However, the effects of A. donax infestation on soil microorganisms remain unclear. These microorganisms may play an important role in ecosystem functions.

7. Conclusions

A. donax has been introduced to over 100 countries in the tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate regions across Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Oceania [2,5,7,26]. One reason for its introduction is its economic value [5,7]. However, it easily escapes from cultivation, and forms dense monospecific stands in riparian areas, agricultural areas, and roadsides, including protected areas [2,5,7,31]. A. donax is listed among the world’s 100 worst invasive alien species due to the risks it poses to native flora and fauna [33]. A. donax grows rapidly and produces large amounts of biomass due to its high photosynthetic ability. It is considered to be one of the fastest-growing terrestrial plants [48,49,50,51,52,53]. This species spreads asexually through the ramets from adventitious buds at the rhizome and stem nodes, forming dense stands [31,83]. Stem and rhizome fragments can easily sprout ramets, establishing new plants and populations along rivers, and promoting long-distance distribution [16,31,87,88,89,90]. Wildfires, flooding and human activity promote the distribution and domination of A. donax [16,48,88,92]. However, information on the production and germination of viable A. donax seeds in its native range is limited. Further research is needed to investigate A. donax seeds production and germination globally.
A. donax can adapt to the various habitats and tolerate to various adverse environmental conditions [2,91,95,96,97,98]. It thrives in temperatures ranging from 10 to 30 °C. However, it can survive in cold temperatures by increasing its sugar concentration and sprouting ramets, even after dieback [2,22,31,91,97,99]. The species tolerates drought stress through morphological and physiological adaptations. It produces small, thick leaves to maintain water-use efficiency. It also maintains vigor and photosynthesis by adjusting osmotic potential and avoiding ROS production [102,103,105,108,111,112]. Under flooding conditions, A. donax switches from aerobic to anaerobic respiration, and produces supplemental energy. Re-oxygenation rapidly enhances its physiological functions [113,114,115]. The species also induces aerenchyma during prolonged waterlogging conditions [113,120]. Aerenchyma contributes to oxygen movement [121,122]. A. donax also has strong salinity tolerance due to physiological adaptations that increase gene expression related to salinity tolerance, maintaining its osmotic potential [126,127,128,129,130,131,133]. Because of its high salinity tolerance, the species is categorized as a halophyte [136,137,138].
A. donax exhibits defense responses against biotic stressors, including herbivores, pathogens, and competing plant species. This species produces indole alkaloids, such as bufotenidine and gramine, as well as the alkaloid, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-N,N-bis(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-cyclobutane-1,3-diimine [149,154,155,169]. These alkaloids are toxic to herbivorous mammals, insects, parasitic nematodes, and pathogenic fungi and oomycetes [149,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,169,170,171,172,173,174,175]. A. donax also accumulates high concentrations of phytoliths [176,177], which protect against pathogen infection and herbivory. Only a few numbers of herbivores and pathogens have been reported to cause significant damage to the growth and populations of A. donax [2,31,183]. Therefore, A. donax may have strong defense mechanisms against biotic stressors. It also exhibits allelopathic activity against competing plant species [197,198] (Table 1).
The characteristics of A. donax, such as its rapid growth and reproductive ability, adaptability to various stress conditions, and defense functions against biotic stressors, may contribute to its infestation, survival, and population expansion in new habitats as an invasive plant species. These characteristics make A. donax difficult to control with a single control measure [5,7,31,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Eradication of A. donax from a habitat requires an ongoing long-term integrated management approach based on its invasive mechanisms. This approach should incorporate smart decision-making tools, innovative equipment, various herbicides, and other methods [225,226,227,228,229,230]. This is the first review to focus on the invasive mechanisms in terms of adaptation to abiotic and biotic stressors, particularly physiological adaptation. However, the mechanisms of mode of action of toxic substances against pathogens and herbivores are unclear. The allelochemicals of A. donax have not yet been identified. Additionally, the effects of A. donax infestation on soil microorganisms remain unclear. This information is necessary to understand the invasive mechanisms A. donax. A. donax is widely cultivated for its economic value. However, its invasive populations have also spread by human activity. There is a need for more concern regarding its invasive traits.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Arundo donax L. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:390837-1 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  2. CABI Compendium Arundo donax (Giant Reed). Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.1940 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  3. PROSEA—Plant Resources of South East Asia. Available online: https://prosea.prota4u.org/view.aspx?id=6525 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  4. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) Arundo donax. Available online: http://www.hear.org/pier/imagepages/singles/ardonp1.htm (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  5. Jiménez-Ruiz, J.; Hardion, L.; Del Monte, J.P.; Vila, B.; Santín-Montanyá, M.I. Monographs on invasive plants in Europe, no. 4: Arundo donax L. Bot. Lett. 2021, 168, 131–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ngernsaengsaruay, C.; Puangsin, B.; Leksungnoen, N.; Khantayanuwong, S.; Chanton, P.; Thaepthup, T.; Wessapak, P.; Meeboonya, R.; Yimlamai, P.; Wanitpinyo, K.; et al. Morphology, taxonomy, culm internode and leaf anatomy, and palynology of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.), Poaceae, growing in Thailand. Plants 2023, 12, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goolsby, J.A.; Moran, P.J.; Jiménez, M.M.; Yang, C.; Canavan, K.; Paynter, Q.; Ota, N.; Kriticos, D.J. Biology of invasive plants 4. Arundo donax L. Invas. Plant Sci. Manag. 2023, 16, 81–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pilu, R.; Cassani, E.; Landoni, M.; Badone, F.C.; Passera, A.; Cantaluppi, E.; Corno, L.; Adani, F. Genetic characterization of an Italian giant reed (Arundo donax L.) clone collection: Exploiting clonal selection. Euphytica 2013, 196, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hardion, L.; Verlaque, R.; Saltonstall, K.; Leriche, A.; Vila, B. Origin of the invasive Arundo donax (Poaceae): A trans-Asian expedition in herbaria. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Danelli, T.; Laura, M.; Savona, M.; Landoni, M.; Adani, F.; Pilu, R. Genetic improvement of Arundo donax L.: Opportunities and challenges. Plants 2020, 9, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bucci, A.; Cassani, E.; Landoni, M.; Cantaluppi, E.; Pilu, R. Analysis of chromosome number and speculations on the origin of Arundo donax L. (giant reed). Cytol. Genet. 2013, 47, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hardion, L.; Verlaque, R.; Rosato, M.; Rossello, J.R.; Vila, B. Impact of polyploidy on fertility variation of Mediterranean Arundo donax L. (Poaceae). Curr. Rev. Biol. 2015, 338, 298–306. [Google Scholar]
  13. Touchell, D.H.; Ranney, T.G.; Panthee, D.R.; Gehl, R.J.; Krings, A. Genetic diversity, cytogenetics, and biomass yields among taxa of giant reeds (Arundo species). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 141, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mariani, C.; Cabrini, R.; Danin, A.; Piffanelli, P.; Fricano, A.; Gomarasca, S.; Dicandilo, M.; Grassi, F.; Soave, C. Origin, diffusion and reproduction of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.): A promising weedy energy crop. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 157, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Balogh, E.; Herr, J.M., Jr.; Czakó, M.; Márton, L. Defective development of male and female gametophytes in Arundo donax L. (Poaceae). Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 45, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haddadchi, A.; Gross, C.L.; Fatemi, M. The expansion of sterile Arundo donax (Poaceae) in southeastern Australia is accompanied by genotypic variation. Aquat. Bot. 2013, 104, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jike, W.; Li, M.; Zadra, N.; Barbaro, E.; Sablok, G.; Bertorelle, G.; Rota-Stabelli, O.; Varotto, C. Phylogenomic proof of recurrent demipolyploidization and evolutionary stalling of the “Triploid Bridge” in Arundo (Poaceae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ren, M.; Liu, F.; Han, X.; Wu, D.; Peng, H. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the autoalloenneaploid Arundo donax. Grassl. Res. 2024, 3, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bell, G.P. Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. In Plant Invasion: Studies from North America and Europe; Brock, J.H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., Green, D., Eds.; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherland, 1997; pp. 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  20. USDA-Field Release of the Arundo Wasp, Tetramesa romana (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), an Insect for Biological Control of Arundo donax (Poaceae). Available online: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/Tetramesa-romana-ea.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  21. Virtue, J.G.; Reynolds, T.; Malone, J.; Preston, C.; Williams, C. Managing the weed risk of cultivated Arundo donax L. New Frontiers in New Zealand: Together We Can Beat the Weeds. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Australasian Weeds Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 26–30 September 2010; pp. 176–179. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bacher, W.; Sauerbeck, G.; Mix-Wagner, G.; El-Bassam, N. Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) Network: Improvement Productivity and Biomass Quality; Final Report FAIR-CT-96-2028. Available online: https://www.openagrar.de/receive/timport_mods_00001974 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  23. Antal, G. Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) from ornamental plant to dedicated bioenergy species: Review of economic prospects of biomass production and utilization. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 24, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jambor, A.; Török, A. The economics of Arundo donax—A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ortega, Z.; Bolaji, I.; Suárez, L.; Cunningham, E. A review of the use of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in the biorefineries context. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2024, 40, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Canavan, K.; Paterson, I.D.; Hill, M.P. Exploring the origin and genetic diversity of the giant reed, Arundo donax in South Africa. Invas. Plant Sci. Manag. 2017, 10, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. EDDMapS, State and County Distribution Map for Giant Reed. Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System. Available online: https://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/viewmap.cfm?sub=3009 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  28. Instituto Méxicano de Tecnologia del Agua, Invasive Species with High Impact on Biodiversity, Priorities in Mexico. Available online: https://www.invasive.org/gist/products/library/mex-especies-invadoras.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  29. Yang, C.; Everitt, J.H.; Goolsby, J.A. Mapping giant reed (Arundo donax) infestations along the Texas–Mexico portion of the Rio Grande with aerial photography. Invas. Plant Sci. Manag. 2011, 4, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, C.; Goolsby, J.A.; Everitt, J.H. Mapping giant reed with Quick-Bird imagery in the Mexican portion of the Rio Grande Basin. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2009, 3, 033530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Giessow, J.; Casanova, J.; MacArthur, R.; Leclerc, R.; Fleming, G. Arundo Donax Distribution and Impact Report; 06-374-559-0, Cal-IPC, 2011; California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC): Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011; Available online: https://www.cal-ipc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Arundo_Distribution_Impact_Report_Cal-IPC_March-2011_small.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  32. Arundo donax Workshop Proceedings, California Exotic Pest Plant Council (CalEPPC), Pismo Beach, CA, USA, 19 November 1993; Jackson, N.E., Frandsen, P., Douthit, P., Eds. Available online: https://www.cal-ipc.org/docs/symposia/archive/pdf/Arundo_Proceedings_1993.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  33. IUCN, 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2000-126.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  34. Howe, C.E. A review of the removal of Arundo donax from a riparian area within San Timoteo Canyon. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 2014, 106. Available online: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/106 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  35. Briggs, M.K.; Poulos, H.M.; Renfrow, J.; Ochoa-Espinoza, J.; Larson, D.; Manning, P.; Sirotnak, J.; Crawford, K. Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo borderlands. River Res. Appl. 2021, 37, 1471–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bruno, D.; Zapata, V.; Guareschi, S.; Picazo, F.; Dettori, E.; Carbonell, J.A.; Millán, A.; Velasco, J.; Robledano, F. Short-term responses of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity to riparian restoration measures designed to control the invasive Arundo donax L. Water 2021, 11, 2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coffey, J.E.; Pomara, L.Y.; Mackey, H.L.; Wood, E.M. Removing invasive giant reed reshapes desert riparian butterfly and bird communities. J. Wildlife Manag. 2023, 87, e22380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Holmes, P.M.; Richardson, D.M.; Esler, K.J.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Fourie, S. A decision-making framework for restoring riparian zones degraded by invasive alien plants in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2005, 101, 553–564. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lawson, D.M.; Giessow, J.A.; Giessow, J.H. The Santa Margarita River Arundo donax control project: Development of methods and plant community response. In Planning for Biodiversity: Bringing Research and Management Together; Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-195; Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture: Albany, CA, USA, 2005; pp. 229–244. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr195/psw_gtr195_2_14_Lawson.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  40. Theoharides, K.A.; Dukes, J.S. Plant invasion across space and time: Factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 256–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Warren, R.J.; Matt Candeias, M.; Labatore, A.; Olejniczak, M.; Yang, L. Multiple mechanisms in woodland plant species invasion. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 12, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kato-Noguchi, H. The impact and invasive mechanisms of Pueraria montana var. lobata, one of the world’s worst alien species. Plants 2023, 12, 3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kurniadie, D. The invasive mechanisms of the noxious alien plant species Bidens pilosa. Plants 2024, 13, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Invasive characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia and its impacts on the species diversity. Diversity 2024, 16, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Clements, D.R.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Defensive mechanisms of Mikania micrantha likely enhance its invasiveness as one of the world’s worst alien species. Plants 2025, 14, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kato-Noguchi, H. Allelopathy of knotweeds as invasive plants. Plants 2022, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Defense molecules of the invasive plant species Ageratum conyzoides. Molecules 2024, 29, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Coffman, G.C.; Ambrose, R.F.; Rundel, P.W. Wildfire promotes dominance of invasive giant reed (Arundo donax) in riparian ecosystems. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 2723–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dudley, T.L. Arundo donax. In Invasive Plants of California Wildlands; Bossard, C.C., Randal, J.M., Hosovsky, M.C., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  50. Erickson, J.E.; Soikaew, A.; Sollenberger, L.E.; Bennet, J.M. Water use and water-use efficiency of three perennial bioenergy grass crops in Florida. Agriculture 2012, 2, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sánchez, E.; Lino, G.; Arias, C.; Serrat, X.; Nogués, S. Photosynthesis, resource acquisition and growth responses of two biomass crops subjected to water stress. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 6, 68–86. [Google Scholar]
  52. Haworth, M.; Catola, S.; Marino, G.; Brunetti, C.; Michelozzi, M.; Riggi, E.; Avola, G.; Cosentino, S.L.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Moderate drought stress induces increased foliar dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) concentration and isoprene emission in two contrasting ecotypes of Arundo donax. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cosentino, S.L.; Patanè, C.; Sanzone, E.; Testa, G.; Scordia, D. Leaf gas exchange, water status and radiation use efficiency of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in a changing soil nitrogen fertilization and soil water availability in a semi-arid Mediterranean area. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 72, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mohr, H.; Schopfer, P. Plant Physiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; pp. 1–629. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rossa, B.; Rüffers, A.V.; Naidoo, G.; von Willert, D.J. Arundo donax L. (Poaceae)—A C3 species with unusually high photosynthetic capacity. Plant Biol. 1998, 111, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Webster, R.J.; Driever, S.M.; Kromdijk, J.; McGrath, J.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Siebke, K.; Demetriades-Shah, T.; Bonnage, S.; Peloe, T.; Lawson, T.; et al. High C3 photosynthetic capacity and high intrinsic water use efficiency underlies the high productivity of the bioenergy grass Arundo donax. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Idris, S.M.; Jones, P.L.; Salzman, S.A.; Croatto, G.; Allinson, G. Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of dairy processing factory wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 3525–3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Spencer, D.F.; Liow, P.S.; Chan, W.K.; Ksander, G.G.; Getsinger, K.D. Estimating Arundo donax shoot biomass. Aquat. Bot. 2006, 84, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kering, M.K.; Butler, T.J.; Biermacher, J.T.; Guretzky, J.A. Biomass yield and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses under nitrogen fertilization. Bioenergy Res. 2012, 5, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Acharya, M.; Burner, D.M.; Ashworth, A.J.; Fritschi, F.B.; Adams, T.C. Growth rates of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus× giganteus) and giant reed (Arundo donax) in a low-input system in Arkansas, USA. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. CAL-IPC-2023, California Invasive Plant Council, Central Valley Arundo donax: Distribution, Impacts, and Management. Available online: https://www.cal-ipc.org/solutions/research/central-valley-arundo/ (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  62. Sharma, K.P.; Kushwaha, S.P.S.; Gopal, B. A comparative study of stand structure and standing crops of two wetland species Arundo donax and Phragmites karka, and primary production in Arundo donax with observations on the effect of clipping. Trop. Ecol. 1998, 39, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  63. Eid, E.M.; Youssef, M.S.; Shaltout, K.H. Population characteristics of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in cultivated and naturalized habitats. Aquat. Bot. 2016, 129, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Curt, M.D.; Sanz, M.; Mauri, P.V.; Plaza, A.; Cano-Ruiz, J.; Sánchez, J.; Aguado, P.L.; Chaya, C.; Fernández, J. Effect of water regime change in a mature Arundo donax crop under a Xeric Mediterranean climate. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 115, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hidalgo, M.; Fernandez, J. Biomass production of ten populations of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) under the environmental conditions of Madrid (Spain). In Biomass for Energy and Industry, Proceeding of the First World Conference, Sevilla, Spain, 5–9 June 2000; Kyritsis, S., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2001; p. 1811. [Google Scholar]
  66. Angelini, L.G.; Ceccarini, L.; Bonari, E. Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in Central Italy as related to different management practices. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22, 375–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fagnano, M.; Impagliazzo, A.; Mori, M.; Fiorentino, N. Agronomic and environmental impacts of giant reed (Arundo donax L.): Results from a long-term field experiment in hilly areas subject to soil erosion. Bioenergy Res. 2015, 8, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Amaducci, S.; Perego, A. Field evaluation of Arundo donax clones for bioenergy production. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 75, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tzanakakis, V.A.; Paranychianakis, N.V.; Angelakis, A.N. Nutrient removal and biomass production in land treatment systems receiving domestic effluent. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 35, 1485–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Günes, K.; Saygin, Ö. Productivity of the energy crops: Giant reed and sweet sorghum in Turkey. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 1996, 5, 756–761. [Google Scholar]
  71. Nazli, R.I.; Tansi, V.; Öztürk, H.H.; Kusvuran, A. Miscanthus, switchgrass, giant reed and bulbous canary grass as potential bioenergy crops in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 125, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mantineo, M.; D’Agosta, G.M.; Copani, V.; Patanè, C.; Cosentino, S.L. Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 2009, 114, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Corno, L.; Pilu, R.; Adani, F. Arundo donax L.: A non-food crop for bioenergy and bio-compound production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1535–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lewandowski, I.; Scurlock, J.M.O.; Lindvall, E.; Christou, M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 25, 335–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Johnson, M.; Dudley, T.; Burns, C. Seed production in Arundo donax. Cal-IPC News 2006, 14, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  76. Saltonstall, K.; Lambert, A.; Meyerson, L.A. Genetics and reproduction of common (Phragmites australis) and giant reed (Arundo donax). Invas. Plant Sci. Manag. 2010, 3, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nikhade, C.; Makde, K. Reproductive behavior of Arundo donax L. Int. J. Res. Biosci. Agric. Technol. 2014, 2, 670–679. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cantaluppi, E.; Cassani, E.; Puglisi, D.; Corno, L.; Munaro, M.; Landoni, M.; Adani, F.; Pilu, R. Study on the inflorescences of Arundo donax L. clones sampled in Italy. Braz. J. Bot. 2016, 39, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Perdue Jr, R.E. Arundo donax—Source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot. 1958, 12, 368–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wen, S. Influence of sewage on seed germination of 12 kinds of plants in wetlands. Wetland Sci. 2015, 13, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cao, C.; Huang, J.; Wang, N.; Yan, C.N.; Peng, C. Impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on seed germination of wetland plant. J. Southeast Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2017, 47, 5. [Google Scholar]
  82. Colin, R.; Aguirre-Planter, E.; Eguiarte, L.E. Genetic and ecological characterization of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in Central Mexico. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0319214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Boland, J.M. The importance of layering in the rapid spread of Arundo donax (giant reed). Madrono 2006, 53, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Boose, A.B.; Holt, J.S. Environmental effects on asexual reproduction in Arundo donax. Weed Res. 1999, 39, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kui, L.; Li, F.; Moore, G.; West, J. Can the riparian invader, Arundo donax, benefit from clonal integration? Weed Res. 2013, 53, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Calazans, E.; Lopes, A.; Girotto, L.; de Paula, A.L.O.; Franco, A.C.; Ferreira, C.S. Mechanical control inadvertently increases risk of alien plant invasion: Influence of stem fragmentation and inundation regimes on Arundo donax regeneration in Neotropical savanna. Aust. J. Bot. 2023, 71, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Else, J.A.; Zedler, P. Dynamics of the flood disturbed zone of a riparian system: Vegetative establishment and resprouting of woody native species and the exotic, Arundo donax. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 1996, 77, 129. [Google Scholar]
  88. Khudamrongsawat, J.; Tayyar, R.; Holt, J.S. Genetic diversity of giant reed (Arundo donax) in the Santa Ana River, California. Weed Sci. 2004, 52, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Decruyenaere, J.G.; Holt, J.S. Seasonality of clonal propagation in giant reed. Weed Sci. 2001, 49, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Else, J.A. Post-Flood Establishment of Native Woody Species and an Exotic, Arundo donax, in a Southern California Riparian System. Master’s Thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  91. PIER-2023, Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk: Plant Threats to Pacific Ecosystems; Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, US Forest Service/HEAR, University of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2023; Available online: http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  92. USDA-APHIS. Weed Risk Assessment for Arundo donax L. (Poaceae)—Giant Reed; Plant Protection and Quarantine, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2012. Available online: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/arundo_donax_wra.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  93. Lambert, A.M.; D’Antonio, C.; Dudley, T.L. Invasive species and fire in California. Fremontia 2010, 38, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ambrose, R.F.; Rundel, P.W. Influence of Nutrient Loading on the Invasion of an Alien Plant Species, Giant Reed (Arundo donax), in Southern California Riparian Ecosystems, UC Water Resources Center Technical Completion Report Project No. W-960. 2007. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qt3s5c4 (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  95. Mann, J.J.; Barney, J.N.; Kyser, G.B.; Di Tomaso, J.M. Miscanthus x giganteus and Arundo donax shoot and rhizome tolerance of extreme moisture stress. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ren, L.; Eller, F.; Lambertini, C.; Guo, W.Y.; Brix, H.; Sorrel, B.K. Assessing nutrient responses and biomass quality for selection of appropriate paludiculture crops. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 1150–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Walshaw, S. Plant Resources of Tropical Africa; PROTA-2023; University Fund Wageningen: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2023; Available online: https://prota.prota4u.org/ (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  98. Csurhes, S. Giant reed, Arundo donax. In Invasive Plant Risk Assessment; Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland: Brisbane, Australia, 2016. Available online: https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/59973/IPA-Giant-Reed-Risk-Assessment.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  99. Pompeiano, A.; Vita, F.; Miele, S.; Guglielminetti, L. Freeze tolerance and physiological changes during cold acclimation of giant reed [Arundo donax (L.)]. Grass Forage Sci. 2015, 70, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hansen, J.; Sato, M.; Ruedy, R.; Lacis, A.; Oinas, V. Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9875–9880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mack, R.N. Evaluating the credits and debits of a proposed biofuel species: Giant reed (Arundo donax). Weed Sci. 2008, 56, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sánchez, E.; Scordia, D.; Lino, G.; Arias, C.; Cosentino, S.L.; Nogués, S. Salinity and water stress effects on biomass production in different Arundo donax L. clones. Bioenergy Res. 2015, 8, 1461–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Romero-Munar, A.; Baraza, E.; Cifre, J.; Achir, C.; Gulías, J. Leaf plasticity and stomatal regulation determines the ability of Arundo donax plantlets to cope with water stress. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Anjum, S.; Xie, X.; Wang, L. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar]
  105. Meier, I.C.; Leuschner, C. Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: Competing effects of precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Haworth, M.; Centritto, M.; Giovannelli, A.; Marino, G.; Proietti, N.; Capitani, D.; De Carlo, A.; Loreto, F. Xylem morphology determines the drought response of two Arundo donax ecotypes from contrasting habitats. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chen, H.; Jiang, J.G. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity. Environ. Rev. 2010, 18, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zivcak, M.; Brestic, M.; Sytar, O. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to drought stress. In Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol. 1: Physiology and Biochemistry; Hossain, M., Wani, S., Bhattacharjee, S., Burritt, D., Tran, L.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 105–143. [Google Scholar]
  109. Ali, O.; Cheddadi, I.; Landrein, B.; Long, Y. Revisiting the relationship between turgor pressure and plant cell growth. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cruz de Carvalho, M.H. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Haworth, M.; Marino, G.; Cosentino, S.L.; Brunetti, C.; De Carlo, A.; Avola, G.; Riggi, E.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Increased free abscisic acid during drought enhances stomatal sensitivity and modifies stomatal behavior in fast growing giant reed (Arundo donax L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 147, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Haworth, M.; Marino, G.; Riggi, E.; Avola, G.; Brunetti, C.; Scordia, D.; Testa, G.; Gomes, M.T.G.; Loreto, F.; Cosentino, S.L.; et al. The effect of summer drought on the yield of Arundo donax is reduced by the retention of photosynthetic capacity and leaf growth later in the growing season. Ann. Bot. 2019, 124, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tshapa, L.; Naidoo, K.; Naidoo, G. Morphological and physiological responses of Arundo donax and Phragmites australis to waterlogging stress. Flora 2021, 279, 151816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pompeiano, A.; Vita, F.; Alpi, A.; Guglielminetti, L. Arundo donax L. response to low oxygen stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 111, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kato-Noguchi, H. Pyruvate metabolism in rice coleoptiles under anaerobiosis. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 50, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kato-Noguchi, H. Submergence tolerance and ethanolic fermentation in rice coleoptiles. Plant Prod. Sci. 2001, 4, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Armstrong, W.; Beckett, P.M.; Colmer, T.D.; Setter, T.L.; Greenway, H. Tolerance of roots to low oxygen: ‘Anoxic’ cores, the phytoglobin nitric oxide cycle and energy or oxygen sensing. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 239, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Banti, V.; Giuntoli, B.; Gonzali, S.; Loreti, E.; Magneschi, L.; Novi, G.; Paparelli, E.; Parlanti, S.; Pucciariello, C.; Santaniello, A.; et al. Low oxygen response mechanisms in green organisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 4734–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pompeiano, A.; Reyes, H.T.; Moles, T.M.; Guglielminetti, L.; Scartazza, A. Photosynthetic and growth responses of Arundo donax L. plantlets under different oxygen deficiency stresses and re-oxygenation. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Speck, O.; Spatz, H.C. Mechanical properties of the rhizome of Arundo donax L. Plant Biol. 2003, 5, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Evans, D.E. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytol. 2004, 161, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yamauchi, T.; Shimamura, S.; Nakazono, M.; Mochizuki, T. Aerenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field Crops Res. 2013, 152, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Parihar, P.; Singh, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Negrão, S.; Schmöckel, S.M.; Tester, M.J.A.O.B. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sánchez, E.; Gil, S.; Azcón-Bieto, J.; Nogués, S. The response of Arundo donax L. (C3) and Panicum virgatum (C4) to different stresses. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 85, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Andreu-Rodríguez, J.; Pérez-Espinosa, A.; Pérez-Murcia, M.D.; Moral, R.; Agulló, E.; Ferrández-Villena, M.; Bustamante, M.A. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for the assessment of biomass production and C sequestration by Arundo donax L. in salt-affected environments. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 183, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pompeiano, A.; Landi, M.; Meloni, G.; Vita, F.; Guglielminetti, L.; Guidi, L. Allocation pattern, ion partitioning, and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Arundo donax L. in responses to salinity stress. Plant Biosyst. 2017, 151, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jia, Y.; Fan, Y.; Chen, T.; Duan, Z.; Liu, S.; Gao, X. Leaf plasticity and biomass allocation of Arundo donax under combined irrigation and nitrogen conditions in Salinized soil. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nackley, L.L.; Kim, S.H. A salt on the bioenergy and biological invasions debate: Salinity tolerance of the invasive biomass feedstock Arundo donax. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 2015, 7, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Michela, J.; Claudia, C.; Federico, B.; Sara, P.; Filippo, V.; Nicola, C.; Manuele, B.; Davide, C.; Loreto, F.; Zappettini, A. Real-time monitoring of Arundo donax response to saline stress through the application of in vivo sensing technology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tyler, R.H.; Boyer, T.P.; Minami, T.; Zweng, M.M.; Reagan, J.R. Electrical conductivity of the global ocean. Earth Planets Space 2017, 69, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cocozza, C.; Brilli, F.; Miozzi, L.; Pignattelli, S.; Rotunno, S.; Brunetti, C.; Giordano, C.; Pollastri, S.; Centritto, M.; Accotto, G.P.; et al. Impact of high or low levels of phosphorus and high sodium in soils on productivity and stress tolerance of Arundo donax plants. Plant Sci. 2019, 289, 110260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Demmig-Adams, B.; Stewart, J.J.; López-Pozo, M.; Polutchko, S.K.; Adams, W.W., III. Zeaxanthin, a molecule for photoprotection in many different environments. Molecules 2020, 25, 5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Havaux, M.; Dall’Osto, L.; Bassi, R. Zeaxanthin has enhanced antioxidant capacity with respect to all other xanthophylls in Arabidopsis leaves and functions independent of binding to PSII antennae. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1506–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Müller, B.; Arcoverde Cerveira Sterner, V.; Papp, L.; May, Z.; Orlóci, L.; Gyuricza, C.; Sági, L.; Solti, Á.; Fodor, F. Alkaline salt tolerance of the biomass plant Arundo donax. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cai, Y.; Cao, X.; Liu, B.; Lin, H.; Luo, H.; Liu, F.; Su, D.; Lv, S.; Lin, Z.; Lin, D. Saline-alkali tolerance evaluation of giant reed (Arundo donax) genotypes under saline–alkali stress at seedling stage. Agronomy 2023, 9, e15521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lino, G.; Espigul, P.; Nogués, S.; Serrat, X. Arundo donax L. growth potential under different abiotic stress. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Evolution of the secondary metabolites in invasive plant species Chromolaena odorata for the defense and allelopathic functions. Plants 2023, 12, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Defensive compounds Involved in the invasiveness of Tithonia diversifolia. Molecules 2025, 30, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Evolution of the defense compounds against biotic stressors in the invasive plant species Leucaena leucocephala. Molecules 2025, 30, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Karban, R.; Myers, J.H. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Maron, J.L.; Crone, E. Herbivory: Effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 2575–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gong, B.; Zhang, G. Interactions between plants and herbivores: A review of plant defense. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Compounds involved in the invasive characteristics of Lantana camara. Molecules 2025, 30, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Allelopathy and allelochemicals of Solidago canadensis L. and S. altissima L. for their naturalization. Plants 2022, 11, 3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kato-Noguchi, H. Allelopathy and allelochemicals of Imperata cylindrica as an invasive plant species. Plants 2022, 11, 2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Kato-Noguchi, H. Defensive molecules momilactones A and B: Function, biosynthesis, induction and occurrence. Toxins 2023, 15, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ghosal, S.; Dutta, S.K.; Sanyal, A.K.; Bhattacharya, S.K. Arundo donax L. (Graminae). Phytochemical and pharmacological evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 1969, 12, 480–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bhattacharya, S.K.; Sanyal, A.K. Neuromuscular blocking activity of bufotenidine isolated from Arundo donax L. Naturwissenschaften 1972, 59, 650–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Shen, H.W.; Jiang, X.L.; Winter, J.C.; Yu, A.M. Psychedelic 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine: Metabolism, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and pharmacological actions. Curr. Drug Metab. 2010, 11, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Roth, B.; Choudhary, M.; Khan, N.; Uluer, A. High-affinity agonist binding is not sufficient for agonist efficacy at 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptors: Evidence in favor of a modified ternary complex model. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997, 280, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Qi, J.; Zulfiker, A.H.M.; Li, C.; Good, D.; Wei, M.Q. The development of toad toxins as potential therapeutic agents. Toxins 2018, 10, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ghosal, S.; Chaudhuri, R.K.; Dutta, S.K. Alkaloids of the flowers of Arundo donax. Phytochemistry 1971, 10, 2852–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Khuzhaev, V.U. Alkaloids of the flora of Uzbekistan, Arundo donax. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2004, 40, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Pastuszewska, B.; Smulikowska, S.; Wasilewko, J.; Buraczewska, L.; Ochtabinska, A.; Mieczkowska, A.; Lechowski, R.; Bielecki, W. Response of animals to dietary gramine. I. Performance and selected hematological, biochemical and histological parameters in growing chicken, rats and pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2001, 55, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sun, X.Q.; Zhang, M.X.; Yu, J.Y.; Jin, Y.; Ling, B.; Du, J.P.; Li, G.H.; Qin, Q.M.; Cai, Q.N. Glutathione S-transferase of brown planthoppers (Nilaparvata lugens) is essential for their adaptation to gramine-containing host plants. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Cai, Q.N.; Zhang, Q.W.; Cheo, M. Contribution of indole alkaloids to Sitobion avenae (F.) resistance in wheat. J. Appl. Entomol. 2004, 128, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cai, Q.N.; Han, Y.; Cao, Y.Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Bi, J.L. Detoxification of gramine by the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Wang, Y.; Cai, Q.N.; Zhang, Q.W.; Han, Y. Effect of the secondary substances from wheat on the growth and digestive physiology of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2006, 103, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Schreiber, K.J.; Nasmith, C.G.; Allard, G.; Singh, J.; Subramaniam, R.; Desveaux, D. Found in translation: High-throughput chemical screening in Arabidopsis thaliana identifies small molecules that reduce fusarium head blight disease in wheat. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hong, Y.; Hu, H.Y.; Xie, X.; Sakoda, A.; Sagehashi, M.; Li, F.M. Gramine-induced growth inhibition, oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in freshwater cyanobacterium microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 91, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hong, Y.; Hu, H.Y.; Sakoda, A.; Sagehashi, M. Isolation and characterization of antialgal allelochemicals from Arundo donax L. Allelopathy J. 2010, 25, 357–368. [Google Scholar]
  164. Kaneko, T.; Nakajima, N.; Okamoto, S.; Suzuki, I.; Tanabe, Y.; Tamaoki, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Kasai, F.; Watanabe, A.; Kawashima, K.; et al. Complete genomic structure of the bloom-forming toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843. DNA Res. 2007, 14, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wilson, A.E.; Sarnelle, O.; Neilan, B.A.; Salmon, T.P.; Gehringer, M.M.; Hay, M.E. Genetic variation of the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa within and among lakes: Implications for harmful algal blooms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6126–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kokubo, Y.; Nishizaka, M.; Ube, N.; Yabuta, Y.; Tebayashi, S.I.; Ueno, K.; Taketam, S.; Ishihara, A. Distribution of the tryptophan pathway-derived defensive secondary metabolites gramine and benzoxazinones in Poaceae. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Al-Snafi, A.E. The constituents and biological effects of Arundo donax. A review. Int. J. Phytopharm. Res. 2015, 6, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  168. Kumar, P.; Singh, S.; Sharma, A.; Kaur, G.; Kaur, R.; Singh, A.N. Arundo donax L.: An overview on its traditional and ethnomedicinal importance, phytochemistry, and pharmacological aspects. J. Herb. Med. Pharmacol. 2021, 10, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Miles, D.H.; Tunsuwan, K.; Chittawong, V.; Kokpol, U.; Choudhary, M.I.; Clardy, J. Boll weevil antifeedants from Arundo donax. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 1277–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mochizuki, K.; Takikawa, H.; Mori, K. Synthesis of 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-N, N′-bis(2, 6-dimethylphenyl) cyclobutane-1, 3-diimine, a unique compound from Arundo donax, and its analogues to test their antifeedant activity against the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Going, B.M.; Dudley, T.L. Invasive riparian plant litter alters aquatic insect growth. Biol. Invasions 2008, 10, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Badar, S.N.; Iqbal, Z.; Sajid, M.S.; Rizwan, H.M.; Shareef, M.; Malik, M.A.; Khan, M.N. Comparative anthelmintic efficacy of Arundo donax, Areca catechu, and Ferula assa-foetida against Haemonchus contortus. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2021, 30, e001221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Galletti, S.; Cianchetta, S.; Righini, H.; Roberti, R. A lignin-rich extract of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) as a possible tool to manage soilborne pathogens in horticulture: A preliminary study on a model pathosystem. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Augspurger, C.K.; Wilkinson, H.T. Host specificity of pathogenic Pythium species: Implications for tree species diversity. Biotropica 2007, 39, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lévesque, C.A.; Brouwer, H.; Cano, L.; Hamilton, J.P.; Holt, C.; Huitema, E.; Raffaele, S.; Robideau, G.P.; Thines, M.; Win, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chauhan, D.K.; Tripathi, D.K.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, Y. Diversity, distribution and frequency based attributes of phytolith in Arundo donax L. Int. J. Innov. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2011, 1, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  177. Shakoor, S.; Soodan, A.S.; Kumar, K. Morphological diversity and frequency of phytolith types in giant reed Arundo donax (L.). World Appl. Sci. J. 2014, 29, 926–932. [Google Scholar]
  178. Perry, C.C.; Keeling-Tucker, T. Biosilicification: The role of the organic matrix in structure control. J. Biol. Inorganic Chem. 2000, 5, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hodson, M.J.; White, P.J.; Mead, A.; Broadley, M.R. Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 1027–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Piperno, D.R. Phytoliths: A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists; Rowman Altamira Press: Lanham, MD, USA, 2006; pp. 1–248. [Google Scholar]
  181. Strömberg, C.A.; Di Stilio, V.S.; Song, Z. Functions of phytoliths in vascular plants: An evolutionary perspective. Funct. Ecol. 2016, 30, 1286–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nawaz, M.A.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Zemchenko, I.V.; Haider, M.S.; Ali, M.A.; Imtiaz, M.; Chung, G.; Tsatsakis, A.; Sun, S.; Golokhvast, K.S. Phytolith formation in plants: From soil to cell. Plants 2019, 8, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Arundo donax; EPPO-2023; EPPO Global Database: Paris, France, 2023; Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ABKDO (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  184. Spencer, D.F. Response of Arundo donax L. (giant reed) to leaf damage and partial defoliation. J. Freshw. Ecol. 2012, 27, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  185. Kato-Noguchi, H. Invasive mechanisms of one of the world’s worst alien plant species Mimosa pigra and its management. Plants 2023, 12, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. Invasive Characteristics and Impacts of Ambrosia trifida. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Muller-Scharer, H.; Schaffner, U.; Steinger, T. Evolution in invasive plants: Implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Chengxu, W.; Mingxing, Z.; Xuhui, C.; Bo, Q. Review on allelopathy of exotic invasive plants. Procedia Eng. 2011, 18, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rice, E.L. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 1984; pp. 1–422. [Google Scholar]
  190. Belz, R.G. Allelopathy in crop/weed interactions—An update. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Fushimi, Y.; Shigemori, H. An allelopathic substance in red pine needles (Pinus densiflora). J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ota, K.; Ino, T. Release of momilactone A and B from rice plants into the rhizosphere and its bioactivities. Allelopathy J. 2008, 22, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  193. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Nakamura, K.; Ohno, O.; Suenaga, K.; Okuda, N. Asparagus decline: Autotoxicity and autotoxic compounds in asparagus rhizomes. Plant Physiol. 2017, 213, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Suzuki, M.; Noguchi, K.; Suenaga, K.; Laosinwattana, C. A potent phytotoxic substance in Aglaia odorata Lour. Chem. Biodiversity 2016, 13, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Mizutani, J.; Hasegawa, K. Allelopathy of oats. II. Allelochemical effect of L-tryptophan and its concentration in oat root exudates. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Kato-Noguchi, H. Convergent or parallel molecular evolution of momilactone A and B: Potent allelochemicals, momilactones have been found only in rice and the moss Hypnum plumaeforme. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Abu-Romman, S.; Ammari, T. Allelopathic effect of Arundo donax, a Mediterranean invasive grass. Plant Omics 2015, 8, 287–291. [Google Scholar]
  198. Girotto, L.; Franco, A.C.; Nunez, C.V.; Oliveira, S.C.; De Souza, M.C.S.; Fachin-Espinar, M.T.; Ferreira, C.S. Phytotoxicity and allelopathic potential of extracts from rhizomes and leaves of Arundo donax, an invasive grass in neotropical savannas. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Patiño, R.; Rashel, R.H.; Rubio, A.; Longing, S. Growth-suppressing and algicidal properties of an extract from Arundo donax, an invasive riparian plant, against Prymnesium parvum, an invasive harmful alga. Harmful Algae 2018, 71, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Manning, S.R.; La Claire, J.W. Prymnesins: Toxic metabolites of the golden alga, Prymnesium parvum Carter (Haptophyta). Marine Drugs 2010, 8, 678–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Liu, S.L.; Wang, W.W.; Liu, F.; Li, H.Y.; Liu, J.S.; Yang, W.D. Removal of two species of harmful algae using gramine modified montmorillonite. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Laue, P.; Bährs, H.; Chakrabarti, S.; Steinberg, C.E. Natural xenobiotics to prevent cyanobacterial and algal growth in freshwater: Contrasting efficacy of tannic acid, gallic acid, and gramine. Chemosphere 2014, 104, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Watts, D.A.; Moore, G.W. Water-use dynamics of an invasive reed, Arundo donax, from leaf to stand. Wetlands 2011, 31, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Jain, S.; Ale, S.; Munster, C.L.; Ansley, R.J.; Kiniry, J.R. Simulating the hydrologic impact of Arundo donax invasion on the headwaters of the Nueces River in Texas. Hydrology 2015, 2, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Spencer, D.F.; Tan, W.; Liow, P.S.; Ksander, G.G.; Whitehand, L.C.; Weaver, S.; Olson, J.; Newhouser, M. Evaluation of glyphosate for managing giant reed (Arundo donax). Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2008, 1, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Cushman, J.H.; Gaffney, K.A. Community-level consequences of invasion: Impacts of exotic clonal plants on riparian vegetation. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 2765–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Stover, J.E.; Keller, E.A.; Dudley, T.L.; Langendoen, E.J. Fluvial geomorphology, root distribution, and tensile strength of the invasive giant reed, Arundo donax and its role on stream bank stability in the Santa Clara River, Southern California. Geosciences 2018, 8, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Spencer, D.F.; Colby, L.; Norris, G.R. An evaluation of flooding risks associated with giant reed (Arundo donax). J. Freshw. Ecol. 2013, 28, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Buldrini, F.; Landi, S.; Titti, G.; Parodi, S.; Valente, M.; Borgatti, L.; Bolpagni, R. Invasive alien plant species, riverbank instability and hydraulic risk: What do we know about Amorpha fruticosa, Arundo donax and Reynoutria japonica? J. Limnol. 2024, 83, 2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Scott, G. Fire threat from Arundo donax. In Proceedings of the Arundo Donax Workshop Proceedings, Ontario, QC, Canada, 19 November 1993; Jackson, N.E., Frandsen., P., Douthit, S., Eds.; University of California Cooperative Extension: Imperial, CA, USA, 1994; pp. 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  211. D’Antonio, C.M. Fire, plant invasions, and global changes. In Invasive Species in a Changing World; Mooney, H.A., Hobbs, R.J., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; pp. 65–93. [Google Scholar]
  212. Jasprica, N.; Bogdanović, S.; Dolina, K.; Ruščić, M.; Pandža, M.; Kovačić, S. Syntaxonomy of Arundo stands along the eastern Adriatic coast. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 887–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Coffman, G.C. Factors Influencing Invasion of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) in Riparian Ecosystems of Mediterranean-Type Climate Regions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  214. Guthrie, G. Impacts of the Invasive Reed Arundo donax on Biodiversity at the Community-Ecosystem Level. Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  215. Gaffney, K.A.; Gledhill, K. Influence of giant reed on floodplain riparian plant communities: Implications for invasive plant control and habitat restoration at the watershed level. In Proceedings of the Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference, Sacramento, CA, USA, 12–25 March 2001; Faber, P.M., Ed.; University of California Press: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  216. Frandsen, P.; Jackson, N. The impact of Arundo donax on flood control and endangered species. In Proceedings of the Arundo donax Workshop, Ontario, QC, Canada, 19 November 1993; Jackson, N.E., Frandsen, P., Duthoit, S., Eds.; California Exotic Pest Plant Council: Riverside, CA, USA, 1993; pp. 13–16. Available online: https://www.cal-ipc.org/docs/symposia/archive/pdf/Arundo_Proceedings_1993.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  217. Osbrink, W.L.; Goolsby, J.A.; Thomas, D.B.; Mejorado, A.; Showler, A.T.; Pérez De León, A. Higher ant diversity in native vegetation than in stands of the invasive Arundo, Arundo donax L., along the Rio Grande basin in Texas, USA. Int. J. Insect Sci. 2017, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Osbrink, W.L.A.; Thomas, D.B.; Goolsby, J.A.; Showler, A.T.; Leal, B. Higher beetle diversity in native vegetation than in stands of the invasive Arundo, Arundo donax L., along the Rio Grande basin in Texas, USA. J. Insect Sci. 2018, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Herrera, A.M.; Dudley, T.L. Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of giant reed (Arundo donax) invasion. Biol. Invasions 2003, 5, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Maceda-Veiga, A.; Basas, H.; Lanzaco, G.; Sala, M.; De Sostoa, A.; Serra, A. Impacts of the invader giant reed (Arundo donax) on riparian habitats and ground arthropod communities. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 731–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Lovich, R.E.; Ervin, E.L.; Fisher, R.N. Surface-dwelling and subterranean invertebrate fauna associated with giant reed (Arundo donax Poaceae) in Southern California. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2009, 108, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Kisner, D.A. The Effect of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) on the Southern California Riparian Bird Community. Master’s Thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  223. Orr, D.A. Avian Response to Arundo donax Invasion on the Lower Santa Clara River. California Invasive Plant Council Symposium, Ventura, CA, USA, poster No. 30. 2010. Available online: https://www.cal-ipc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2010Cal-IPCFinalProgram.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  224. Hardesty-Moore, M.; Orr, D.; McCauley, D.J. Invasive plant Arundo donax alters habitat use by carnivores. Biol. Invasions 2020, 22, 1983–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Gerhards, R.; Sanchez, D.A.; Hamouz, P.; Peteinatos, G.G.; Christensen, S.; Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Advances in site-specific weed management in agriculture: A review. Weed Res. 2022, 62, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Korres, N.E.; Burgos, N.R.; Travlos, I.; Vurro, M.; Gitsopoulos, T.K.; Varanasi, V.K.; Duke, S.O.; Kudsk, P.; Brabham, C.; Rouse, C.E.; et al. Chapter six—New directions for integrated weed management: Modern technologies, tools, and knowledge discovery. Adv. Agron. 2019, 155, 243–319. [Google Scholar]
  227. Monteiro, A.; Santos, S. Sustainable approach to weed management: The role of precision weed management. Agronomy 2022, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Sharma, G.; Shrestha, S.; Kunwar, S.; Tseng, T. Crop diversification for improved weed management: A review. Agriculture 2021, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Westwood, J.H.; Charudattan, R.; Duke, S.O.; Fennimore, S.A.; Marrone, P.; Slaughter, D.C.; Swanton, C.; Zollinger, R. Weed management in 2050: Perspectives on the future of weed science. Weed Sci. 2018, 66, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhang, W.; Miao, Z.; Li, N.; He, C.; Sun, T. Review of current robotic approaches for precision weed management. Curr. Robot. Rep. 2022, 3, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Arundo donax. (A) Stand; (B) base of the stand; (C) stem; (D) branches (E) leaves; (F) leaf base and ligule.
Figure 1. Arundo donax. (A) Stand; (B) base of the stand; (C) stem; (D) branches (E) leaves; (F) leaf base and ligule.
Plants 14 02175 g001
Figure 2. Arundo donax habitats. (A) Bay area; (B) roadside; (C) hillside.
Figure 2. Arundo donax habitats. (A) Bay area; (B) roadside; (C) hillside.
Plants 14 02175 g002
Figure 3. Arundo donax. (A) Panicle; (B) ramet.
Figure 3. Arundo donax. (A) Panicle; (B) ramet.
Plants 14 02175 g003
Figure 4. Compounds involved in the defense functions of Arundo donax. 1: Bufotenidine; 2: gramine; 3: 2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl-N,N-bis(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-cyclobutane-1,3-diimine.
Figure 4. Compounds involved in the defense functions of Arundo donax. 1: Bufotenidine; 2: gramine; 3: 2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl-N,N-bis(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-cyclobutane-1,3-diimine.
Plants 14 02175 g004
Table 1. Invasive mechanisms of Arundo donax.
Table 1. Invasive mechanisms of Arundo donax.
Invasive CharacteristicsReferences
Rapid growth and large biomass production
Efficient photosynthetic capacity
[48,49,50,51,52,53]
High vegetative reproduction
Ramets from stem and rhizome nodes
[2,31,83]
Stem and rhizome fragments that contain at least one node
[16,31,87,88,89,90]
High morphological and physiological adaptation to adverse conditions
Wide range of habitats
[2,95,96,97,98]
Cold temperature: Sugar accumulations, ramet sprouting after dieback
[2,22,31,91,97,99]
Drought: High water-use efficiency, adjustment of osmotic potential, ROS protection
[102,103,105,106,108,111,112]
Flooding: Aerenchyma formation, anaerobic respiration
[113,114,120]
Salinity: Adjustment of osmotic potential, ROS protection
[102,126,127,128,129,130,131,133]
High defense ability against biotic stressors
Production of toxic substances against pathogens and herbivores
[149,154,155,169]
Phytolith accumulation against pathogens and herbivores
[176,177]
Allelopathy
[197,198]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kato, M. The Invasive Mechanism and Impact of Arundo donax, One of the World’s 100 Worst Invasive Alien Species. Plants 2025, 14, 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142175

AMA Style

Kato-Noguchi H, Kato M. The Invasive Mechanism and Impact of Arundo donax, One of the World’s 100 Worst Invasive Alien Species. Plants. 2025; 14(14):2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kato-Noguchi, Hisashi, and Midori Kato. 2025. "The Invasive Mechanism and Impact of Arundo donax, One of the World’s 100 Worst Invasive Alien Species" Plants 14, no. 14: 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142175

APA Style

Kato-Noguchi, H., & Kato, M. (2025). The Invasive Mechanism and Impact of Arundo donax, One of the World’s 100 Worst Invasive Alien Species. Plants, 14(14), 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop