Next Article in Journal
Validation of Management Zones, Variability, and Spatial Distribution of the Physiological Quality of Soybean Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of In Vitro Germination, Viability Tests and Storage of Daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) Pollen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variation in Odour Profiles of Cauliflower, Curly Kale and Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) Cultivars Is Affected More by Genotype Rather than Herbivore Feeding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Olfactory Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis and Orius similis to Volatiles from Houttuynia cordata: Implications for Thrip Management

1
Department of Resources and Environment, Moutai Institute, Renhuai 564507, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350000, China
3
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Rare Animal and Economic Insect of the Mountainous Region, Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Guiyang University, Guiyang 550005, China
4
Institute of Plant Protection, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
5
Chemistry Interdisciplinary Project (ChIP) Research Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
6
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(12), 1855; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121855
Submission received: 4 May 2025 / Revised: 6 June 2025 / Accepted: 12 June 2025 / Published: 16 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Ecology of Plant and Insect Pests)

Abstract

:
Thrips can be attracted or repelled by volatiles from different host plant species. Houttuynia cordata is a common plant species with a strong, offensive smell, and few pests have been detected on this plant. Here, the olfactory responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to H. cordata volatiles were tested using electroantennography (EAG) and behavioral bioassays in different types of olfactometers, and the behavioral responses of Orius similis, a natural enemy of F. occidentalis, to the related main volatile compounds were also evaluated. Y-tube olfactometer bioassays showed that F. occidentalis performed negative responses to H. cordata volatiles. Decanal (47.21%), 1-decanol (11.02%), dodecanal (7.13%), β-myrcene (5.12%), and decanoyl acetaldehyde (3.76%) were the more abundant components in the H. cordata volatile profile in gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. EAG recordings showed that the antennae of female thrips could perceive these five compounds at a wide range of concentrations. In six-arm olfactometer bioassays, F. occidentalis exhibited negative responses to decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde at various doses but performed positive responses to 1-decanol and β-myrcene at certain doses. Furthermore, decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde at all concentrations showed no significant influences on the behavioral responses of O. similis. According to the results above, H. cordata can be a repellent plant species to F. occidentalis, and decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde show great potential for development as repellents for the control of F. occidentalis. In short, our results suggest that an integrated pest management system combining H. cordata-derived biopesticides with releases of the predator O. similis could effectively control F. occidentalis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), first arose as one of the world’s most significant invasive pests of agricultural and horticultural crops in the 1970s and 1980s [1]. F. occidentalis was originally described in 1895 in California, USA, and has since become an economically significant destructive pest with a geographic range that has rapidly expanded over the last 20 years. F. occidentalis causes direct damage through feeding and oviposition on leaves, flowers, and fruits, affecting yields and aesthetic appearance; it also causes indirect damage through the transmission of viruses [2,3].
As a phytophagous pest, F. occidentalis can attack over 250 crop species from over 60 families [4], yet its full host range is likely much broader, including vegetables, ornamentals, fruits, and cotton, among others [5]. In addition, F. occidentalis occurs on many uncultivated plants [6]. F. occidentalis has spread extensively through increased international trade and has become a dominant thrips species in many of the areas it has invaded [1,7,8]. Reliable estimates of economic losses are scarce and difficult to determine; however, given the high polyphagia of this pest as well as the plant pathogenic viruses it transmits, economic losses are likely very high [9,10]. Therefore, great attention has been paid to the effective control of this pest species.
For the control of F. occidentalis, reliance on a single management tactic, especially insecticides, has not been effective or sustainable [5,11]. Despite integrated pest management strategies being implemented, insecticides remain the cornerstone of many F. occidentalis management programs [5,12]. Such reliance on insecticides is unfortunate because F. occidentalis populations have a propensity for developing insecticide resistance, and resistance to several insecticide groups has been reported, including organophosphate, pyrethroid, and organochlorine pesticides [13,14,15,16]. Thus, novel strategies as alternatives to conventional insecticides for managing F. occidentalis are urgently needed.
In recent years, ethological control strategies have been considered more sustainable and environmentally friendly for pest management. However, most ethological control studies using semiochemicals have focused on larger insect pests, such as moths and beetles, with fewer studies on the numerous smaller insect pests, such as thrips [11,17]. Since the middle of the last century, the use of semiochemicals for pest control as a replacement for insecticides has been studied as a sustainable alternative [18]. Therefore, studies on thrips–host plant interactions are necessary for determining effective volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to implement practical F. occidentalis control methods [18]. Functional VOCs act as semiochemicals, which determine and/or modify the behavior of insects, through attraction or repulsion; in some cases, they are toxic to certain insect species [19,20].
Houttuynia cordata Thunb. (Piperales: Saururaceae), commonly known as fish mint, is a creeping aromatic medicinal herb with thin spreading rhizomes and a height of 30–60 cm [21]. It is an important traditional medicine in East and Southeast Asia, especially in China, Japan, and Thailand, where the plant is known as Kao-Tong or Plu Kao [22]. H. cordata can be commonly found in the wild and in cultivated fields in Guizhou Province, China; their fresh leaves and rhizomes are consumed as a vegetable, condiments, and spices. In particular, few phytophagous insects have been detected on this plant species, which may relate to the plant’s specific odor [22,23] that repels insects or is not preferred by them.
Therefore, in the present study, the behavioral and electrophysiological responses of F. occidentalis to the volatiles of fresh H. cordata leaves were investigated. Further, behavioral responses of Orius similis Zheng (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), an important natural enemy of F. occidentalis [24], to the volatile compounds identified from H. cordata were also evaluated. Our study is based on the ecological regulation of “pest–host plant–natural enemy” for pest management. Taken together, these results can help narrow the gap between theoretical research and the practical application of behavioral regulation for pest control. In particular, this study provides useful information for the development of new attractants/repellents for the safe and sustainable control of F. occidentalis in agroforestry crops, in which O. similis can also be used to suppress F. occidentalis populations in combination with these semiochemicals.

2. Results

2.1. Behavioral Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to Plant Volatiles

In the Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, F. occidentalis showed significant responses when offered a choice between the odor of plant materials in one chamber and clean air in the other, responding positively to the volatiles of Rosa rugosa (χ2 = 21.33, df = 1, p < 0.001) and Cucumis sativus (χ2 = 17.89, df = 1, p < 0.001) but negatively to those of H. cordata (χ2 = 25.92, df = 1, p < 0.001) (Figure 1A).
Given a choice between pairs of these plant materials, F. occidentalis showed positive responses to the odors of R. rugosa paired with C. sativus (χ2 = 12.76, df = 1, p = 0.011) and H. cordata (χ2 = 38.75, df = 1, p < 0.001) and also showed positive responses to C. sativus paired with H. cordata (χ2 = 32.67, df = 1, p < 0.001) (Figure 1B).

2.2. Analysis of Houttuynia cordata Volatiles

Thirty-eight components were identified in the volatiles from H. cordata leaves (Table 1). The component with the highest relative content was decanal (47.21%), followed by 1-decanol (11.02%), dodecanal (7.13%), and β-myrcene (5.12%). There were no other components with a relative content exceeding 4%, but decanoyl acetaldehyde (3.76%), nonanal (3.50%), and undecanal (3.48%) also showed relatively higher contents compared with the other components in the volatile profile of H. cordata leaves.

2.3. Electroantennography Analyses

Two-way ANOVAs testing the effect of compound, and concentration on the EAG responses of F. occidentalis are shown in Table 2. The EAG responses of F. occidentalis were significantly affected by compound (F = 221.11, p < 0.001), concentration (F = 16.56, p < 0.001), and their interactions (F = 33.41, p < 0.001).
Further, one-way ANOVA showed different responses of thrips to the five compounds at the 0.01 μg (F4,20 = 28.89, p < 0.001), 0.1 μg (F4,20 = 90.48, p < 0.001), 1 μg (F4,20 = 492.26, p < 0.001), 10 μg (F4,20 = 242.33, p < 0.001), and 100 μg (F4,20 = 48.84, p < 0.001) doses (Figure 2). The mean EAG response to dodecanal at 0.01 μg was significantly higher than those recorded for decanal, β-myrcene, and 1-decanol, but not significantly different from that to decanoyl acetaldehyde. At the 0.1, 10, and 100 μg doses, the mean EAG response to dodecanal was significantly higher than those to decanal, β-myrcene, and decanoyl acetaldehyde. At the 1 µg dose, the highest mean EAG response was recorded on stimulation with β-myrcene among the different stimuli tested.

2.4. Behavioral Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to Houttuynia cordata Volatiles in a Six-Arm Olfactometer

In these bioassays, compared with the mineral oil control, F. occidentalis was repelled by decanal at all concentrations (Friedman test: χ2 = 22.56, df = 5, p < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.042–0.043), with the 50 µg/µl concentration eliciting a significantly higher repellent effect than the other concentrations (Figure 3). Similarly, compared with the mineral oil control, F. occidentalis was also repelled by dodecanal (Friedman test: χ2 = 14.05, df = 5, p < 0.015; Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.042–0.043) and decanoyl acetaldehyde (Friedman test: χ2 = 22.56, df = 5, p < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.042–0.043) at all concentrations, and there were no significant differences in repellent effect among the concentrations of each of these two compounds. β-Myrcene was attractant to F. occidentalis at various concentrations (Friedman test: χ2 = 24.00, df = 5, p < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.042–0.043), with the most attractant dose being 5 μg/μL. For 1-Decanol, thrips showed attraction only to the concentration of 5 μg/μL (Friedman test: χ2 = 14.45, df = 5, p < 0.001; Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.039–0.043).

2.5. Behavioral Responses of Predator Orius similis to compounds of Houttuynia cordata Volatiles in a Six-Arm Olfactometer

In the six-arm olfactometer bioassay, O. similis showed no attraction to decanal (Friedman test: χ2 = 3.44, df = 5, p = 0.632), dodecanal (Friedman test: χ2 = 3.33, df = 5, p < 0.649), or decanoyl acetaldehyde (Friedman test: χ2 = 6.39, df = 5, p = 0.270) at any concentration (Figure 4). There were no significant differences in the number of O. similis that entered into each arm for each concentration of these three compounds.

3. Discussion

It was reported that cucumber and rose flowers are the preferred host plants of F. occidentalis [25,26,27,28]. Here, when compared with cucumber and rose, H. cordata was not a preferred host plant, and it even repelled F. occidentalis in behavioral assays using the volatiles of H. cordata leaves. Usually, phytophagous insects rely on semiochemicals to search for suitable food, oviposition, and mating sites [29,30,31]. Therefore, the identification of behaviorally active compounds, either attractants or repellents, can provide a means for the monitoring and direct control of insect pests and can be used to improve integrated pest management systems.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry revealed 38 volatile compounds in H. cordata, among which decanal, 1-decanol, dodecanal, and β-myrcene were the most abundant. Further, EAG showed that these four main compounds were perceived by the peripheral olfactory systems of F. occidentalis females in a wide range of concentrations, with responses scaled in a dose-dependent manner. Although decanoyl acetaldehyde showed a relatively lower content among the volatile components of H. cordata, it is a characteristic component of the H. cordata odor [22,23]. Similarly to the above four main components, decanoyl acetaldehyde also elicited significant EAG responses in F. occidentalis.
In the six-arm olfactometer bioassays investigating the biological activity of these VOCs, F. occidentalis showed varying behavioral responses. β-Myrcene was attractive to F. occidentalis at various concentrations (0.1–50 μg/μL), and its most attractive concentration was 5 μg/μL. This compound has been reported as attractive at low concentrations to another thrip pollinator, Cycadothrips chadwicki (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripdae), and is also a repellant at high concentrations [32]. For 1-decanol, F. occidentalis showed no attraction except at the concentration of 5 μg/μL. Olfactory repellence was seen in F. occidentalis to the other three compounds (decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde) over the range of concentrations (0.1–50 μg/μL) used in this study. To a certain extent, this may explain why F. occidentalis exhibits negative responses to the odor of H. cordata leaves.
For thrips, the repellence of some plant odors can be attributed to single constituents. For example, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is repelled by volatiles from freshly cut lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) leaves, with one of the major compounds being the volatile monoterpenoid citral [33]. However, the influences of the ratios of plant volatiles on behavioral responses have also been highlighted for many phytophagous insects, including F. occidentalis [34,35,36,37]. Further, olfactory repellence in thrips has been demonstrated to be concentration-dependent, with some volatiles being effective only at specific concentrations and others over a range of concentrations [38]. Therefore, the present study used different concentrations of decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde individually, and it is possible that more compounds identified from the H. cordata volatiles are involved. The role of combinations of the VOCs and the ratio of their concentrations on the repellence or control of F. occidentalis should be further investigated in the field in future. In the laboratory, it is difficult to determine which VOCs repel thrips better, as most F. occidentalis chose clean air in the olfactometer bioassays.
There have been numerous studies on plant volatiles that are attractive or repellent to F. occidentalis. In these studies, p-anisaldehyde, benzaldehyde, ethyl nicotinate, nonanal, and other plant-produced semiochemicals have been reported to attract F. occidentalis in the laboratory, open field, and greenhouse [11,39,40,41,42,43], while 2-phenylethyl acetate, β-ionone, methyl salicylate, salicylaldehyde and other semiochemicals were found to repel F. occidentalis in the laboratory [27,38,44,45]. In addition, “insect pests–host plants–predators” systems regulated by semiochemicals can be useful in biological control strategies for the management of thrips [11,24,32]. For example, methyl isonicotinate can attract both F. occidentalis and their anthocorid predators (e.g., Orius laevigatus [Hemiptera: Anthocoridae]) [46]. Here, although β-myrcene was attractive to F. occidentalis at various concentrations, we focused on the repellent effects of VOCs on this thrip species for the purpose of pest control. Although decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde showed no attractiveness to O. similis, they were all repellent to F. occidentalis. Therefore, in the future, better control may be achieved by incorporating these volatile compounds as thrip-repellent biopesticides with biological control releases of O. similis in a multitactic integrated pest management system.
For interactions between thrips and host plants, prior to locating a potential host plant, thrips use plant volatiles as olfactory cues at a distance to avoid unsuitable hosts and at close range to avoid unsuitable plant parts. Therefore, based on the olfactory bioassays reported herein, H. cordata can be considered as an unsuitable host plant species for F. occidentalis, and decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde have the potential to be developed as repellents or deterrents for the control of F. occidentalis. Repellents cause insects to move away from an odor source and prevent adult insects from landing on a plant, further preventing contact between the insect and the stimulus [11,47,48]; further, odorants present on the plant surface or in the plant can act after alighting and may inhibit feeding or oviposition. It is difficult to discriminate repellents from deterrents, because the volatilization of compounds may give provide olfactory input even after contact with the plant [49,50]. In this manner, decanal, dodecanal, decanoyl acetaldehyde, and the other volatile chemicals identified herein should be further evaluated for their influence on the feeding, oviposition, and other behaviors of F. occidentalis during interactions with host plants. This will help in better understanding the physicochemical characteristics of these chemicals (e.g., used as repellents or deterrents) and making full use of them for the management of thrips as pest species. It has been reported that repellent volatiles may be involved in the resistance of chrysanthemum and cowpea cultivars to F. occidentalis [33,51], and these plants also show promise for developing cultivars with resistance to F. occidentalis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Insects and Plants

Mixed populations of F. occidentalis collected from various host plant species in the Nanming District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China, were used to establish a laboratory colony [25]. The independent colony was continuously reared for more than five generations on bean pods of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabales: Leguminosae) in plastic containers [25,26]. The containers were kept in a climate-controlled room at 26 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5% relative humidity with a 14:10 h light/dark photoperiod.
H. cordata seedlings were collected from the wild in Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China, and planted in greenhouses in the nursery of Guiyang University (Guiyang, China); two common vegetable/flower host plant species of F. occidentalis, cucumber (C. sativus L. var. Qianyou No. 1) and rose (R. rugosa Thunb. var. Carola), were also grown in the nursery. These plants were cultivated without the application of pesticides. Rose flowers at anthesis with intact petals were collected for olfactory tests. Leaves of H. cordata and cucumber were used for experiments when the plants had eight true leaves.

4.2. Behavioral Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to Plant Volatiles in a Y-Tube Olfactometer

The olfactory responses of F. occidentalis were tested in a Y-tube olfactometer using the method described in our previous study [25]. We made two types of comparisons: (1) each plant versus clean air and (2) all plants versus each other. Based on the results of previous studies, cucumber (C. sativus L. var. Qianyou No. 1) and rose (R. rugosa Thunb. var. Carola), were used in these comparisons [25,52]. The airflow rate was 250 mL/min. All bioassays were conducted between 08:00 and 18:00 in a room at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity, and 1000 lux illumination. For each comparison, 50–60 females that were 2–3 days old were tested individually, and there was 5 min for each thrip to make a choice or not [25]. Thrips were starved for 6 h before the bioassay, and the plant material (20.0 g) was replaced after every 10 tested individuals.

4.3. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Plant volatiles were collected and analyzed as described by Cao et al. [52]. Plant material (0.3 g) was kept in a glass bottle (200 mL) for 2 h before the volatiles emitted were captured using a solid-phase microextraction fiber (a ~50/30 µm DVB/CAR/PDMS StableFlex fiber). The volatiles were extracted for 40 min at 80 °C before the fiber head was quickly removed. The collected volatiles were analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HP6890/5975C; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). To identify compounds, we compared the mass spectra of compounds with those in databases (Nist 2005 and Wiley 275), and their constituents were confirmed through co-injection with authentic standards. The volatiles from the leaves of H. cordata were collected and analyzed.

4.4. Electroantennograms

The antennal sensitivity of F. occidentalis females (2–3 days old) to increasing concentrations of the five test compounds was evaluated using electroantennography (EAG) with a technique described by Abdullah et al. [53] and detailed in our previous study [34]. The antennae of F. occidentalis females were excised at the groove between antennal segments 7 and 8 (most distal to the head) to achieve better contact with electrodes. The antenna was placed between the head end of a reference electrode and the top of a recording electrode, with the aid of a micromanipulator. The EAG equipment (IDAC-2; Syntech GmbH, Kirchzarten, Germany) consisted of a data acquisition collector, an AC/DC amplifier, a stimulus flow controller, a single-ended probe, and a micromanipulator. To ensure electrical continuity between the antennal preparation and the EAG apparatus, the recording and reference electrodes were silver-coated wires in pulled glass micropipettes containing 0.5 M KCl conductive saline solution. For each test compound, 10 μL of different mineral oil solutions, providing doses of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg, was adsorbed onto a piece of filter paper (1 cm2, Whatman No. 1) inserted into a Pasteur pipette, which was used as an odor cartridge [34]. Mineral oil was used as the control in each experiment. Each dose of the four compounds was tested on five different antennae from different female thrips; each antenna sample was stimulated by each dose of each compound in the following order: control, sample, control. The average of the two controls was used for analysis. The EAG responses of thrips to the compounds were calculated as
Relative EAG value = T − CK,
where T is the absolute EAG value for the antennae samples and CK is the absolute EAG value for the control. For the five tested compounds, decanal (chemical purity ≥ 97%), dodecanal (chemical purity ≥ 95%), and β-myrcene (chemical purity ≥ 90%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; 1-decanol (chemical purity ≥ 97%) was purchased from Dr. A. Maisch GmbH (Baden-Württemberg, Germany); decanoyl acetaldehyde (chemical purity ≥ 95%) was purchased from National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.

4.5. Behavioral Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to Houttuynia cordata Volatiles in a Six-Arm Olfactometer

As decanal, 1-decanol, dodecanal, β-myrcene, and decanoyl acetaldehyde were the five compounds with the highest relative abundances in the volatile profile of H. cordata, behavioral responses of F. occidentalis to different doses of each of these compounds were further assessed in a six-arm olfactometer [54,55]. The six-arm olfactometer consisted of a central chamber (12 cm internal diameter) with six arms, each of which was connected to a glass tube (angles between pairs of tubes were 60°) that projected outwards at an equal distance. Each arm was connected with Teflon tubing to a glass vessel, which was used as the odor chamber that contained a test (10 µL of each compound solution at 0.1, 1, 5, 25, and 50 μg/μL) or control stimulus (10 μL mineral oil). The airflow was set at 200 mL/min to drive the odor towards the thrips. Female F. occidentalis (2–3 days old, starved for 6 h) were introduced into the olfactometer in groups of 200 individuals. The thrips were counted and considered as having made a choice for a particular odor source within 30 min, any thrips that entered into one of these arms were considered to make a choice [54,55,56]. The bioassays were replicated five times and carried out between 09:00 and 17:00 at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C).

4.6. Behavioral Responses of Orius similis to Houttuynia cordata Volatiles in a Six-Arm Olfactometer

To evaluate potential influences on the behavioral response of predators of F. occidentalis, the olfactory responses of O. similis to decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde at various concentrations mentioned above were also tested. Similar to the process for the six-arm olfactometer bioassay described above (see Section 4.5), O. similis (2–3 days old, starved for 8 h) were introduced into the olfactometer in groups of 120 individuals (1:1 male/female ratio). The airflow was set at 200 mL/min to drive the odor towards the O. similis. The bioassays were replicated five times, and each bioassay was accomplished within 30 min.

4.7. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The null hypothesis that F. occidentalis adults showed no preference for either Y-tube arm (a response equal to 50:50) was tested using a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test. The number of thrips and O. similis found in the different arms of the six-arm olfactometers were subjected to Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks. In the case of significance (p < 0.05), the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for the separation of means. Two-way ANOVA was carried out to examine the effects of compound, concentration, and their interactions on the EAG responses of thrips. If ANOVA indicated significant treatment effects, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05) was used to test the separate means. Before ANOVA, data were submitted to the Shapiro–Wilk test to verify the normal distribution of data and to Levene’s test to assess the homogeneity of variances.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that F. occidentalis showed negative olfactory responses to the volatiles of H. cordata leaves, which were closely related to the components of H. cordata volatiles. Further, decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde, identified from the volatile profile of H. cordata, had repellent effects on F. occidentalis but exhibited neither attraction nor repellence to O. similis, the natural predator of F. occidentalis. Therefore, new control measures for F. occidentalis can be considered by incorporating these volatile compounds (repellent effects) with the release of O. similis (preying on thrips).

Author Contributions

Y.C., F.M. and G.S.G. conceived and designed the research. G.Z., S.L., F.J., R.Y., S.H. and L.W. conducted the experiments. F.M., Y.C., S.L., C.Z. and G.S.G. analyzed the data. G.Z., Y.C. and G.S.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Training Project for High-Level Innovative Talent in Guizhou Province (GCC[2023]074), Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province (ZK[2022]001), Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity (Qiankehe ZSYS[2025]024), Program for Natural Science Research in Guizhou Education Department QJJ[2023]024, and High-Level Talents Program of Moutai Institute (mygccrc[2022]069) for financial support.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reitz, S.R. Biology and ecology of the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): The making of a pest. Fla. Entomol. 2009, 92, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pappu, H.R.; Jones, R.A.C.; Jain, R.K. Global status of tospovirus epidemics in diverse cropping systems: Successes achieved and challenges ahead. Virus Res. 2009, 141, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Whitfield, A.E.; Ullman, D.E.; German, T.L. Tospovirus-thrips interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 459–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewis, T. Thrips as Crop Pests; CAB Int: Wallingford, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  5. Reitz, S.R.; Gao, Y.L.; Kirk, W.D.J.; Hoddle, M.S.; Funderburk, J.E. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nyasani, J.O.; Meyhöfer, R.; Subramanian, S.; Poehling, H.M. Feeding and oviposition preference of Frankliniella occidentalis for crops and weeds in Kenyan French bean fields. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kirk, W.D.J.; Terry, L.I. The spread of the western fower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Agric. For. Entomol. 2003, 5, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, S.Y.; Xing, Z.L.; Ma, T.T.; Xu, D.W.; Li, Y.Y.; Lei, Z.Z.; Gao, Y.L. Competitive interaction between Frankliniella occidentalis and locally present thrips species: A global review. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goldbach, R.; Peters, D. Possible causes of the emergence of tospovirus diseases. Semin. Virol. 1994, 5, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rotenberg, D.; Whitfield, A.E. Molecular interactions between tospoviruses and thrips vectors. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2018, 33, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kirk, W.D.J.; de Kogel, W.J.; Koschier, E.H.; Teulon, D.A.J. Semiochemicals for Thrips and Their Use in Pest Management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021, 66, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, Y.L.; Lei, Z.R.; Reitz, S.R. Western fower thrips resistance to insecticides: Detection, mechanisms and management strategies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1111–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Götte, E.; Rybak, M. Pest control of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) with proven insecticide resistance in cut flowers in greenhouses. Gesunde Pflanze 2011, 62, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, D.G.; Shang, X.Y.; Reitz, S.R.; Nauen, R.; Lei, Z.R.; Lee, S.H.; Gao, Y.L. Field resistance to spinosad in western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2803–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.H.; Gong, Y.J.; Jin, G.H.; Li, B.Y.; Chen, J.C. Field-evolved resistance to insecticides in the invasive western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in China. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mavridis, K.; Ilias, A.; Papapostolou, K.M.; Varikou, K.; Michaelidou, K.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Vontas, J. Molecular diagnostics for monitoring insecticide resistance in the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 1615–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Broughton, S.; Cousins, D.A.; Rahman, T. Evaluation of semiochemicals for their potential application in mass trapping of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) in roses. Crop Prot. 2015, 67, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beck, J.J.; Torto, B.; Vannette, R.L. Eavesdropping on plant-insectmicrobe chemical communications in agricultural ecology: A virtual issue on semiochemicals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5101–5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Renwick, A. Phytochemical modifcation of taste: An insect model. In Biologically Active Natural Products: Agrochemicals, 1st ed.; Cutler, H., Cutler, S., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1999; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  20. Petroski, R.J.; Stanley, D.W. Natural compounds for pest and weed control. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8171–8179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhuyan, H.; Das, S.R.C. Evaluation of anthelmintic activity of Houttuynia cordata. J. Fundam. Pharm. Res. 2013, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fu, J.; Dai, L.; Lin, Z.; Lu, H. Houttuynia cordata Thunb: A review of phytochemistry and pharmacology and quality control. Chin. Med. 2013, 4, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, M.; Prasad, S.K.; Hemalatha, S. A current update on the phytopharmacological aspects of Houttuynia cordata Thunb. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2014, 8, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Mouden, S.; Sarmiento, K.F.; Klinkhamer, P.G.L.; Leiss, K.A. Integrated pest management in western flower thrips: Past, present and future. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cao, Y.; Zhi, J.R.; Cong, C.L.; Margolies, D.C. Olfactory cues used in host selection by Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in relation to host suitability. J. Insect Behav. 2014, 27, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, Y.; Zhi, J.R.; Zhang, R.Z.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Lv, Z.Y.; Gao, Y.L. Different population performances of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips hawaiiensis on flowers of two horticultural plants. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 1, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Avellaneda1, J.; Díaz1, M.; Coy-Barrera, E.; Rodríguez1, D.; Osorio, C. Rose volatile compounds allow the design of new control strategies for the western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, W.D.; Zhang, P.J.; Zhang, J.M.; Zhang, Z.J.; Huang, F.; Bei, Y.W.; Lin, W.C.; Lu, Y.B. An evaluation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Frankliniella intonsa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) performance on different plant leaves based on life history characteristics. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Knolhoff, L.M.; Heckel, D.G. Behavioral assays for studies of host plant choice and adaptation in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bruce, T.J.A.; Wadhams, L.J.; Woodcock, C.M. Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dyer, L.A.; Philbin, C.S.; Ochsenrider, K.M.; Richards, L.A.; Massad, T.J.; Smilanich, A.M.; Forister, M.L.; Parchman, T.L.; Galland, L.M.; Hurtado, P.J.; et al. Modern approaches to study plant–insect interactions in chemical ecology. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Terry, I.; Walter, G.H.; Moore, C.; Roemer, R.; Hull, C. Odor-mediated push-pull pollination in cycads. Science 2007, 318, 19–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diabate, S.; Martin, T.; Murungi, L.; Fiaboe, K.; Subramanian, S.; Wesonga, J.; Delétré, E. Repellent activity of Cymbopogon citratus and Tagetes minuta and their specific volatiles against Megalurothrips sjostedti. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 143, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tian, H.J.; Chen, Y.X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Lin, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, G.; Wei, H. A mixture of p-anisaldehyde and ethyl nicotinate elicits positive antennal and behavioral responses in Frankliniella occidentalis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2022, 170, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Webster, B.; Bruce, T.; Pickett, J.; Hardie, J. Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become non-host cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Anim. Behav. 2010, 79, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Najar-Rodriguez, A.J.; Galizia, C.G.; Stierle, J.; Dorn, S. Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant-derived volatile mixtures. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 3388–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Egger, B.; Spangl, B.; Koschier, E.H. Habituation in Frankliniella occidentalis to deterrent plant compounds and their blends. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2014, 151, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Koschier, E.H.; Nielsen, M.C.; Spangl, B.; Davidson, M.M.; Teulon, D.A.J. The effect of background plant odours on the behavioural responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to attractive or repellent compounds in a Y-tube olfactometer. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2017, 163, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brødsgaard, H.F. The effect of anisaldehyde as a scent attractant for Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and the response mechanism involved. IOBC WPRS Bull. 1990, 13, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  40. Frey, J.E.; Cortada, R.V.; Helbling, H. The potential of flower odours for use in population monitoring of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis Perg. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1994, 4, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koschier, E.H.; de Kogel, W.J.; Visser, J.H. Assessing the attractiveness of volatile plant compounds to western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26, 2643–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Davidson, M.M.; Perry, N.B.; Larsen, L.; Green, V.C.; Butler, R.C.; Teulon, D.A.J. 4-pyridyl carbonyl compounds as thrips lures: Effectiveness for western flower thrips in Y-tube bioassays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6554–6561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Davidson, M.M.; Butler, R.C.; Teulon, D.A.J. Pyridine compounds increase thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) trap capture in an onion crop. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 1468–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chermenskaya, T.D.; Burov, V.N.; Maniar, S.P.; Pow, E.M.; Roditakis, N.; Selytskaya, O.G.; Shamshev, I.V.; Wadhams, L.J.; Woodcock, C.M. Behavioural responses of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), to volatiles from three aromatic plants. Insect Sci. Appl. 2001, 21, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Koschier, E.H.; Hoffmann, D.; Riefler, J. Influence of salicylaldehyde and methyl salicylate on post-landing behaviour of Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande. J. Appl. Entomol. 2007, 131, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davidson, M.M.; Nielsen, M.C.; Butler, R.C.; Castañé, C.; Alomar, O.; Riudavets, J.; Teulon, D.A.J. Can semiochemicals attract both western flower thrips and their anthocorid predators? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2015, 155, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Deletre, E.; Schatz, B.; Bourguet, D.; Chandre, F.; Williams, L.; Ratnadass, A.; Martin, T. Prospects for repellent in pest control: Current developments and future challenges. Chemoecology 2016, 26, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dethier, V.G.; Browne, B.L.; Smith, C.L. The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 1960, 53, 134–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Renwick, J.A.A. Oviposition stimulants and deterrents. In CRC Handbook of Natural Pesticides, Attractants and Repellents; Morgan, E.D., Mandava, N.B., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; pp. 151–153. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, T.; Stoopen, G.; Thoen, M.; Wiegers, G.; Jongsma, M.A. Chrysanthemum expressing a linalool synthase gene “smells good”, but “tastes bad” to western flower thrips. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McKellar, R.C.; McGarvey, B.D.; Tsao, R.; Lu, X.W.; Knight, K.P. Application of the electronic nose to the classification of resistance to western flower thrips in chrysanthemums. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cao, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.W.; Gao, Y.L. Laboratory and field investigation on the orientation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) to more suitable host plants driven by volatiles and component analysis of volatiles. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abdullah, Z.S.; Ficken, K.J.; Greenfield, B.P.J.; Butt, T.M. Innate responses to putative ancestral hosts: Is the attraction of western flower thrips to pine pollen a result of relict olfactory receptors? J. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 40, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cao, Y.; Benelli, G.; Germinara, G.S.; Maggi, F.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, S.L.; Yang, H.; Li, C. Innate positive chemotaxis to paeonal from highly attractive Chinese medicinal herbs in the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, X.F.; Chen, H.H.; Li, J.K.; Zhang, R.; Turlings, T.C.J.; Li, C. Volatiles released by Chinese liquorice roots mediate host location behaviour by neonate Porphyrophora sophorae, (Hemiptera: Margarodidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1959–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Turlings, T.C.J.; Davison, A.C.; Tamo, C. A six-arm olfactometer permitting simultaneous observation of insect attraction and odour trapping. Physiol. Entomol. 2010, 29, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Behavioral responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to host plant odors in a Y-tube olfactometer. (A) host plant odors versus clean air; (B) host plant odors versus each other. CA: clean air. Asterisks indicate highly significant (** p < 0.01) and significant (* p < 0.05) differences in the selectivity of F. occidentalis between two paired odors by χ2 test.
Figure 1. Behavioral responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to host plant odors in a Y-tube olfactometer. (A) host plant odors versus clean air; (B) host plant odors versus each other. CA: clean air. Asterisks indicate highly significant (** p < 0.01) and significant (* p < 0.05) differences in the selectivity of F. occidentalis between two paired odors by χ2 test.
Plants 14 01855 g001
Figure 2. Electroantennography responses of Frankliniella occidentalis females to decanal, 1-decanol, dodecanal, β-myrcene, and decanoyl acetaldehyde. Mean values are shown. For each dose, different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s honest significant difference test).
Figure 2. Electroantennography responses of Frankliniella occidentalis females to decanal, 1-decanol, dodecanal, β-myrcene, and decanoyl acetaldehyde. Mean values are shown. For each dose, different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s honest significant difference test).
Plants 14 01855 g002
Figure 3. Olfactory responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to different compounds from the volatile profile of H. cordata in a six-arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, different letters indicate significant differences (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Olfactory responses of Frankliniella occidentalis to different compounds from the volatile profile of H. cordata in a six-arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, different letters indicate significant differences (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05).
Plants 14 01855 g003
Figure 4. Behavioral responses of Orius similis to decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde in a six-arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, the same letter indicates no significant differences (Friedman test, p > 0.05).
Figure 4. Behavioral responses of Orius similis to decanal, dodecanal, and decanoyl acetaldehyde in a six-arm olfactometer. The control was mineral oil. Each box plot represents the median and its range of dispersion (lower and upper quartiles and outliers). Above each box plot, the same letter indicates no significant differences (Friedman test, p > 0.05).
Plants 14 01855 g004
Table 1. Volatile components of Houttuynia cordata leaves.
Table 1. Volatile components of Houttuynia cordata leaves.
NumberCompoundMolecular FormulaMolecular WeightContent (%)
13-HexenalC6H10O980.61
23-Hexen-1-ol, (E)-C6H12O1002.15
32-Hexenal, (E)-C6H10O980.79
41-HexanolC6H14O1020.09
5NonaneC9H201280.31
62,4-Hexadienal, (E,E)-C6H8O960.05
7α-ThujeneC10H161360.04
8α-PineneC10H161360.29
9CampheneC10H161360.05
104-Oxohex-2-enalC6H8O21120.08
11SabineneC10H161361.57
12β-PineneC10H161360.41
13β-MyrceneC10H161365.12
14OctanalC8H16O1280.06
15α-TerpineneC10H161360.07
16LimoneneC10H161360.11
17(Z)-β-OcimeneC10H161360.06
18(E)-β-OcimeneC10H161361.69
19γ-TerpineneC10H161360.11
20UndecaneC11H241560.06
21NonanalC9H18O1423.50
221-NonanolC9H20O1441.32
23DecanalC10H20O15647.21
241-DecanolC10H22O15811.02
25l-Bornyl acetateC12H20O21960.12
262-UndecanoneC11H22O1701.65
27UndecanalC11H22O1703.48
28n-Decanoic acidC10H20O21720.12
29Geranyl acetateC12H20O21960.78
30DodecanalC12H24O1847.13
31Decanoyl acetaldehydeC12H22O21983.76
32(E)-CaryophylleneC15H242040.86
33α-HumuleneC15H242040.08
34(E)-β-FarneseneC15H242040.67
35BicyclogermacreneC15H242040.49
36(E, E)-α-FarneseneC15H242040.15
37TetradecanalC14H28O2120.47
38HexadecanalC16H32O2400.07
Table 2. Two-way ANOVAs testing for the effects of compound and concentrations on the electroantennography responses of Frankliniella occidentalis.
Table 2. Two-way ANOVAs testing for the effects of compound and concentrations on the electroantennography responses of Frankliniella occidentalis.
ParameterSourcedfMSFp
Relative EAG value (mv)Compound40.613221.11<0.001
Concentration40.04616.56<0.001
Compound × Concentration160.09333.41<0.001
Error800.003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, G.; Lin, S.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, C.; Yuan, R.; Huang, S.; Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; Maggi, F.; Germinara, G.S. Olfactory Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis and Orius similis to Volatiles from Houttuynia cordata: Implications for Thrip Management. Plants 2025, 14, 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121855

AMA Style

Zeng G, Lin S, Jiang F, Zhang C, Yuan R, Huang S, Wang L, Cao Y, Maggi F, Germinara GS. Olfactory Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis and Orius similis to Volatiles from Houttuynia cordata: Implications for Thrip Management. Plants. 2025; 14(12):1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121855

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Guang, Shuo Lin, Feiyu Jiang, Changrong Zhang, Rongrong Yuan, Shuai Huang, Lijuan Wang, Yu Cao, Filippo Maggi, and Giacinto Salvatore Germinara. 2025. "Olfactory Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis and Orius similis to Volatiles from Houttuynia cordata: Implications for Thrip Management" Plants 14, no. 12: 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121855

APA Style

Zeng, G., Lin, S., Jiang, F., Zhang, C., Yuan, R., Huang, S., Wang, L., Cao, Y., Maggi, F., & Germinara, G. S. (2025). Olfactory Responses of Frankliniella occidentalis and Orius similis to Volatiles from Houttuynia cordata: Implications for Thrip Management. Plants, 14(12), 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121855

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop