Next Article in Journal
Pharmacognostic Evaluation, Chemical Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity of Bassia indica (Wight) A.J. Scott
Next Article in Special Issue
Pyroxsulam Resistance in Apera spica-venti: An Emerging Challenge in Crop Protection
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Climate Change on the Distribution of Suitable Habitats and Ecological Niche for Trollius Wildflowers in Ili River Valley, Tacheng, Altay Prefecture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance to Mesosulfuron-methyl and Identification of Candidate Genes in Bromus japonicus

1
Institute of Plant Protection, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300381, China
2
Key Laboratory of Pesticide Toxicology and Application Technique, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection, Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2024, 13(13), 1751; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131751
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 22 June 2024 / Published: 25 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds)

Abstract

:
The evolved resistance of Bromus japonicus Houtt. to ALS-inhibiting herbicides is well established. Previous studies have primarily focused on target-site resistance; however, non-target-site resistance has not been well characterized. This investigation demonstrated that ALS gene sequencing did not detect any previously known resistance mutations in a mesosulfuron-methyl-resistant (MR) population, and notably, treatment with the P450 monooxygenase (P450) inhibitor malathion markedly heightened susceptibility to mesosulfuron-methyl. Utilizing UPLC-MS/MS analysis confirmed elevated mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism in MR plants. The integration of Isoform Sequencing (Iso-Seq) and RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) facilitated the identification of candidate genes associated with non-target sites in a subpopulation with two generations of herbicide selection. Through qRT-PCR analysis, 21 differentially expressed genes were characterized, and among these, 10 genes (comprising three P450s, two glutathione S-transferases, one glycosyltransferase, two ATP-binding cassette transporters, one oxidase, and one hydrolase) exhibited constitutive upregulation in resistant plants. Our findings substantiated that increased herbicide metabolism is a driving force behind mesosulfuron-methyl resistance in this B. japonicus population.

1. Introduction

Weeds are a serious threat to food security, as they reduce crop yields worldwide [1]. Because of their high efficiency, simplicity, and low cost, herbicides have become the most important means of weed control in modern agriculture. However, their long-term and widespread use has resulted in weed resistance to herbicides, which has become a critical global problem [2]. A better understanding of weed resistance mechanisms is crucial for monitoring resistance and weed management.
Weed resistance mechanisms can be divided into two main categories: target-site resistance (TSR) and non-target-site resistance (NTSR) [3,4]. TSR mainly results from mutations in genes encoding herbicide-binding sites, whereas NTSR is a form of resistance mechanism that reduces the amount of herbicide reaching the target site, such as decreased herbicide penetration into the plant, decreased rates of herbicide translocation, and increased rates of herbicide sequestration/metabolism [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Enhanced herbicide metabolism, also named metabolic resistance, has been reported in some important weed species [9], involving P450 monooxygenase (P450), glucosyltransferases (GT), glutathione S-transferases (GST), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, and peroxidase (POD) [6,7]. For example, enhanced metabolism by cytochrome P450s is likely a mechanism of resistance to pyroxsulam in Bromus sterilis [10]. Owing to these unpredictable processes, herbicide metabolic genes may have pleiotropic effects on weeds [11]. It has been reported that P450 is associated with fitness costs, although this link is sometimes nonexistent [12,13]. Metabolic resistance has the potential to endow plants with tolerance to a range of herbicides, irrespective of their mode of action, thus posing a significant risk to herbicide efficacy and sustainability [14]. Therefore, research on NTSR mechanisms is critical for continuous weed control.
Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) technology offers a robust approach for exploring the genetic mechanisms underlying herbicide stress responses in weeds [15,16], especially for identifying the genetic differences between herbicide-resistant and susceptible plants [17,18,19]. Recently, RNA-Seq has been used to identify several genes related to NTSR in weeds, such as Lolium rigidum Gaudin [17,20,21], Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. [22], Beckmannia syzigachne Steud. [23], Descurainia sophia L. [24], Alopecurus aequalis Sobol. [25], and Myosoton aquaticum L. [26]. Nevertheless, the limitations present in transcript reconstruction create significant challenges in computation and complicate the detection of splice events [27]. Recently, full-length transcriptomes that offer long reads extending up to 10 kb have been generated. This enables the precise reconstruction of full-length splice variants, resulting in a more reliable isoform dataset compared to that from RNA-Seq [28].
Bromus japonicus Houtt. is an annual grass weed that severely invades winter wheat fields in China [29]. Seedlings typically emerge during September and October, initiate flower in early May, and commence seed dispersal by early October [30]. A B. japonicus plant can produce approximately 1885 seeds, which are generally dispersed by wind and water flow because of their light weight. These seeds can germinate over a wide temperature range of 5 to 30 °C, under varying pH levels, and even in the absence of light [29]. B. japonicus competes with wheat, leading to at least a 30% yield loss in fields heavily infested with 640 plants m−2 [31]. Furthermore, extensive genetic variability has occurred among and within the Chinese populations of B. japonicus, which is likely to contribute significantly to their adaptability and infestation as a weed species [32]. Herbicides, as strong selective factors, can result in selection for resistance among populations in a short time, making resistant plants dominant. Currently, postemergence treatment with herbicides, such as flucarbazone-sodium, pyroxsulam, and mesosulfuron-methyl, have been widely adopted for controlling B. japonicus. Unfortunately, B. japonicus has developed a remarkable degree of target-site resistance to these herbicides in certain regions of China because of their extensive and persistent use [33,34]. In this study, we identified a population of B. japonicus (TJ07) that showed high resistance to the herbicide methyl 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)carbamoylsulfamoyl]-4-(methanesulfonamidomethyl)benzoate (mesosulfuron-methyl), with no known ALS resistance mutations in surviving individuals. In addition, P450s may play an important role because the P450 inhibitor malathion can significantly reduce weed resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl. However, the genes responsible for metabolic resistance remain unclear. Therefore, we performed ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assays and second- and third-generation sequencing in this study to confirm metabolism-based resistance in TJ07 and to provide abundant genetic information on crucial herbicide-metabolizing enzymes.

2. Results

2.1. Mesosulfuron-methyl Dose–Response in the Absence and Presence of Malathion

Whole-plant dose–response experiments demonstrated that the MR population had a significant resistance level (resistance index, RI = 51.8-fold) to mesosulfuron-methyl (Table 1). When malathion was applied alone (1000 g a.i. ha−1), there was no visual effect on MR or S seedling growth. However, malathion significantly reduced the resistance of the MR population to mesosulfuron-methyl. Under combined mesosulfuron-methyl and malathion treatments, the GR50 values of mesosulfuron-methyl decreased by 83.2% and 34% in the MR and S populations, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1). Malathion is typically used as a P450 indicator of herbicide metabolic resistance. These results indicated that P450s likely mediate enhanced mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism in the MR population.

2.2. ALS Gene Sequencing

ALS gene sequencing revealed no known ALS resistance mutations in MR plants (Table 2). Therefore, whole-plant resistance in the MR population may not be due to a TSR mechanism.

2.3. Mesosulfuron-methyl Absorption and Metabolism in B. japonicus Plants

UPLC-MS/MS analysis revealed no noteworthy disparity in the absorption rates of mesosulfuron-methyl between the MR and S populations in the absence of malathion pretreatment at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days (Figure 2). Compared to the sole use of mesosulfuron-methyl, pre-treatment with malathion did not significantly enhance the absorption rate of mesosulfuron-methyl in either the MR or S populations (Figure 2). No statistically significant differences were observed between the MR and S populations at the same time points or under identical treatment conditions (Figure 2).
Concerning herbicide metabolism, the mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism rate was significantly higher in the MR population without malathion pre-treatment compared to the S plants (Figure 3). Specifically, the metabolic rates in the MR plants at 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT were 56.6%, 64.9%, 79.8%, and 82.0%, respectively, markedly surpassing those observed in the S plants, which were 46.9%, 58.7%, 69.3%, and 69.0%, respectively (Figure 3).
The application of malathion effectively minimized the disparity in metabolic rates between the MR and S populations. After malathion pre-treatment, the metabolic rate of MR plants decreased by 11.3, 11.8, 13.3, and 13.5% on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th day, respectively. However, the metabolic rate of S plants did not change significantly. Additionally, there was no notable disparity in the rate of mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism between the MR and S plants on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th day following malathion pre-treatment.

2.4. Transcriptome Sequencing, Assembly, and Functional Annotation

We employed Illumina sequencing technology in conjunction with PacBio SMRT sequencing to conduct a comprehensive analysis of gene expression disparities between MR and S populations under various treatments based on transcriptomic data. After quality filtering, approximately 249,000,000 high-quality clean data points were generated, ranging from 20,619,829 to 21,379,828 points per sample. The average Q30 percentage for each library was 94.43. After quality control, 413,904 circular consensus numbers with an average length of 1578 bp were obtained from PacBio SMRT sequencing. By eliminating polyA and chimeric sequences from the full-length sequences, we obtained 73,729 high-quality transcripts through clustering and error correction processes.
Based on redundant transcript sequences, 34,794 ORFs were predicted. Three different software programs (i.e., the coding potential calculator, coding non-coding index, and coding potential assessment tool) were used to predict the coding sequences. After excluding RNA molecules that possessed coding potential, a total of 2149 overlapping lncRNA predictions were pinpointed. Altogether, 33,220 assembled genes were annotated across eight databases, with the NR database yielding the highest degree of similarity (Table 3). Based on the NR database annotations, the assembled genes of B. japonicus were most similar to those of Aegilops tauschii, Hordeum vulgare, Triticum urartu, Triticum aestivum, Brachypodium distachyon, and Oryza sativa (Figure S1).
In the GO analysis, genes assigned to “biological process”, “cellular component”, and “molecular function” contained 50 functional subgroups (Figure S2). Among the 21 subgroups of biological processes, metabolic (53.38%) and cellular (50.73%) processes were the two major contributors. Cells (66.86%), cell parts (66.74%), and organelles (55.36%) were the three major contributors among the 15 subgroups of cellular components. Among the 14 molecular function subgroups, the catalytic activity (51.67%) and binding (51.57%) subgroups represented the two major contributors. KEGG analysis was used to annotate the information of the identified genes at the pathway level to further understand the function of the genes. They were assigned to 50 KEGG pathways, primarily involved in “Metabolism” (2120 genes, 73.66%), “Genetic information processing” (521 genes, 18.10%), “Cellular processes” (135 genes, 4.69%), “Environmental information processing” (54 genes, 1.88%), and “Organismal systems” (48 genes, 1.67%) (Figure S3).

2.5. Identification and Functional Analysis of DEGs

Transcript levels were reported as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (RPKM). The full-length non-chimeric transcripts’ isoforms served as the reference sequence. Subsequently, we aligned the second-generation high-throughput sequencing data to this reference using RSEM software. Among the reads, 88.10% to 88.75% aligned to the reference sequence, while 49.77% to 52.04% mapped to multiple positions.
We identified 4270 DEGs between the untreated and herbicide-treated MR samples with 2396 upregulated genes and 1874 downregulated genes. Compared with untreated S samples, 3141 upregulated and 1918 downregulated genes were found in herbicide-treated S samples. Compared with herbicide-treated samples, 6171 upregulated and 6754 downregulated genes were found in MR and S samples, respectively. Additionally, 5906 genes were upregulated, while 6107 were downregulated in untreated MR samples compared to untreated S samples (Figure 4A). Differential expression between MR and S samples in the three treatments (S_T vs. S_CK, MR_T vs. MR_CK, and MR_T vs. S_T) was evident in 809 contigs (Figure 4B).
Next, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed on the annotated DEGs between the MR_T and S_T samples (Figure S4). In GO analysis, 9808 DEGs were enriched in the GO subgroups “metabolic process” (5467, 55.74%) and “cellular process” (5084, 51.83%) in biological processes; “cell” (6542, 66.70%), “cell part” (6528, 66.56%), and “organelle” (5394, 55.00%) in cellular components; and “catalytic activity” (5232, 53.34%) and “binding” (5123, 52.23%) in molecular function. Moreover, DEGs were enriched in 123 KEGG pathways. Among the top 15 enriched pathways of upregulated genes (Table 4), 34 upregulated genes were enriched in “Glutathione metabolism” pathways. Overall, annotation and enrichment analyses suggested that GST genes and other genes involved in metabolic/signaling pathways are vital for the metabolic resistance of B. japonicus against mesosulfuron-methyl.

2.6. Selection of Candidate Metabolic-Resistance Genes and Their Relative Expressions

We analyzed the constitutive and herbicide-inducible DEGs related to metabolic resistance in MR and S plants to identify and validate candidate genes. Based on metabolism-related functional annotations, we identified genes associated with detoxification (e.g., those encoding P450, GST, GT, ABC transporter, oxidase, hydrolase, and POD), resulting in the identification of 21 contigs (Table 5). Their expression levels were verified through two rounds of qRT-PCR.
Findings revealed that in the transcriptome sample group, 14 out of 21 candidate genes exhibited significantly higher expression levels in MR (TJ07) plants compared to S (TJ01) plants. In the parallel sample group, 11 out of 21 candidate genes were notably upregulated, with 10 contigs consistently upregulated in both groups (Table 5). They encoded proteins with homology to three P450s (CYP71C4, CYP90D2, and CYP72A15), two GSTs (MEE6.28 and GSTZ5), one GT (SGT31), two ABC transporters (ABCC10 and ABCC2), one oxidase, and one hydrolase.

3. Discussion

Mesosulfuron-methyl is a highly effective ALS-inhibiting herbicide extensively used in China over the last decade. However, extensive and persistent use has inevitably resulted in the development of herbicide resistance. Resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl has been identified in many monocotyledonous weeds such as A. aequalis, B. japonicus, A. tauschii, Lolium multiflorum, Alopecurus japonicus, and B. syzigachne [25,33,34,35,36,37,38]. With increasing levels of mesosulfuron-methyl resistance in weeds, there is an urgent need to elucidate potential resistance mechanisms. NTSR plays a crucial role in resistance to ACCase- and ALS-inhibiting herbicides [7,39].
In recent years, RNA-Seq technology has been instrumental in illuminating the mechanisms underlying metabolic herbicide resistance in weeds [24,25,26,40]. Unfortunately, the limitations of RNA-Seq in sequencing fragments of less than 300bp prevent accurate acquisition and assembly of complete transcripts, thus hindering the identification of isoforms, homologous genes, superfamily genes, and allele genes, especially in cases with low-quality or non-existent reference genomes [41]. Single-molecule sequencing technology eliminates the need to disrupt RNA molecules, enabling precise determination of the entire structure of a single transcript and the subsequent derivation of a complete cDNA sequence [42,43]. Enhancing the ability to uncover intricate details can offer a deeper understanding of transcriptome complexity. Our study utilized RNA-Seq and full-length transcriptome data to pinpoint genes involved in metabolic herbicide resistance mechanisms.
P450s are the most prevalent enzymes involved in herbicide detoxification. However, owing to their vast quantity and complex functionality, fully exploring the potential of herbicide metabolism mediated by P450 remains challenging [44]. We identified three P450 genes (CYP71C4, CYP90D2, and CYP72A15) in B. japonicus that are important for metabolic resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl groups. These findings are similar to those of many other weeds with metabolic herbicide resistance, and approximately 30 P450s have been demonstrated to possess herbicide-metabolizing function [45]. For example, CYP71D10 is significantly transcribed in A. aequalis with mesosulfuron-methyl resistance [25]. Several P450 genes (CYP710A1, CYP74A, CYP96A13, CYP96B116, CYP76M51, CYP94A1, CYP77A3, CYP86A8, and CYP86A2) are overexpressed in herbicide-resistant M. aquaticum [26], D. sophia [24], P. fugax [40], A. aequalis [25], and C. bursa-pastoris [28]. Several P450 genes that confer herbicide resistance have been identified in crop species, such as CYP71A10 in soybean [46], CYP749A16 in cotton [47], and CYP71C6v1 in wheat [48]. Transgenic technology can enhance our understanding of the crucial role of P450s in herbicide resistance. For example, the CYP76 family enhances the resistance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana to monoterpenol and phenylurea herbicides [49].
GST and GT are two additional enzyme families that play crucial roles in herbicide detoxification. These enzymes can either directly bind to herbicides or catalyze the reactions involved in their metabolism [6]. We identified two GST genes (MEE6.28 and GSTZ5) and one GT gene (SGT31) in B. japonicus exhibiting metabolic resistance. Previous studies reported that GST-mediated metabolic resistance is an important factor in the high resistance of Amaranthus palmeri to atrazine [50]. Tau-, Phi-, Cys-, and Ser-GSTs are primarily responsible for herbicide detoxification in plants [51,52]. Dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), a GST member, is important for GSH binding and oxidized glutathione release [53], and is more active in wheat than in L. multiflorum Lam [54]. Similarly, ALS-inhibiting herbicides elicit an increase in GT gene activity in A. thaliana [55]. UGT90A1 and UGT83A1 in B. syzigachne [56] and GST23 and UGT73C5 in P. fugax [40] were overexpressed, leading to metabolic resistance. These findings imply that the overexpression of GST and GT in the B. japonicus population could potentially contribute to mesosulfuron-methyl resistance. Moreover, metabolic detoxification observed in A. myosuroides is partially attributed to the elevated expression of P450s and GSTs, ultimately resulting in enhanced O-glucosyl transferase activity [57]. This implies that the herbicide defense mechanism operates in collaboration with multiple gene families, necessitating further investigation to elucidate the precise roles of P450s, GSTs, and GTs.
Compared with P450s, GSTs, and GTs, ABC transporters generally segregate herbicides and their metabolites to express resistance [6]. In the present study, two ABC transporters (ABCC10 and ABCC2) were found to be involved in B. japonicus resistance, supporting the results of previous studies on herbicide detoxification [58]. Similarly, AB8G and AB14G are related to the resistance of C. bursa-pastoris to tribenuron-methyl [28]. ABCC and ABCG are likely to participate in fenoxaprop-p-ethyl metabolic resistance in P. fugax [40]. Moreover, the ABC transporter AtOPT6 may confer resistance to primisulfuron in A. thaliana by transporting glutathione derivatives [59]. Overexpression of ABCC8 can also confer resistance to glyphosate in several crops, such as rice, soybean, and maize [60]. Therefore, the ABC transporter is likely involved in mesosulfuron-methyl resistance in B. japonicus, indicating that this population may have two NTSR mechanisms: an enhanced metabolism and a protective mechanism. This protective mechanism warrants further investigation in the future.
We identified two other genes encoding hydrolases and oxidases that are likely associated with mesosulfuron-methyl metabolic resistance in B. japonicus. Hydrolases can cleave herbicide molecules and, subsequently, oxidases transform them into hydrophilic metabolites [6]. This process shields plant cells from oxidative damage triggered by herbicides, thereby contributing to herbicide resistance [3].
NTSR serves as a universally adaptive trait for weeds, potentially granting resistance to a diverse array of herbicides [61]. We speculated that the NTSR mechanism exhibited by the TJ07 population may confer broad-spectrum resistance to other herbicides. To gain insight into the potential metabolic resistance mechanisms of B. japonicus, further experiments are needed to verify the resistance functions and mechanisms of the candidate genes in subsequent stages.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Seeds of the resistant B. japonicus population (TJ07) were collected from wheat fields in Tianjin China, in 2018, where mesosulfuron-methyl failed to control this weed. The seeds, harvested from a minimum of 50 mature plants randomly scattered across the field, were thoroughly blended, air-dried, and subsequently stored in paper bags at a temperature of 4 °C for future utilization. The susceptible population (TJ01) (hereafter designated as S) was described by Li et al. [33]. Prior to planting, seeds were sown on 9 cm Petri dishes lined with two layers of Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Maidstone, UK) moistened with 5 mL distilled water. Petri dishes were kept in growth chambers at 25 °C and for a 12 h photoperiod (Model RXZ, Ningbojiangnan Instrument Factory, Ningbo, China). After four days, 90 germinated seeds were transplanted into six plastic pots (11 cm × 9 cm) filled with mixed soil (50% organic matter and moist loam soil, pH 5.6). The pots were randomly placed in a controlled greenhouse, and watered every 48 h. B. japonicus seedlings were thinned to ten seedlings that were evenly sized at the two- to three-leaf stage, and treated with herbicides when they reached the three- to four-leaf stage. Herbicides were applied using a laboratory sprayer equipped with a flat fan nozzle delivering 450 L ha−1 at 275 kPa. After spraying, the weeds were returned to the greenhouse, and the surviving seedlings (plants with new growth were considered alive) or biomass (aboveground dry weight) were recorded 21 d after treatment (DAT). Finally, there were 40 surviving plants.
Forty plants that survived treatment with 27 g a.i. ha−1 (2-fold higher than the field-recommended rate) of mesosulfuron-methyl (30 g L−1 OD; Bayer, Hangzhou, China) were selected for ALS gene sequencing. Twenty resistant plants with no known ALS resistance mutations were isolated before flowering, and seeds were obtained and used for a second round of mesosulfuron-methyl resistance selection (27 g a.i. ha−1). Plants surviving the second round of selection were also isolated to produce seeds (hereafter designated as MR), which were used for subsequent experiments.

4.2. Effect of Malathion on Mesosulfuron-methyl Resistance

Whole-plant dose–response experiments were conducted to determine the GR50 values of the MR and S populations for mesosulfuron-methyl in the absence and presence of malathion (45% EC; Huayu, Tianjin, China). Malathion was applied at a rate of 1000 g a.i. ha−1, with no negative effects on B. japonicus seedling growth [25,28]. Mesosulfuron-methyl was sprayed 1 h after malathion application at rates of 0, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, and 729 g a.i. ha−1 for MR plants and 0, 0.11, 0.33, 1, 3, 9, and 27 g a.i. ha−1 for S plants. Herbicides were applied using a laboratory sprayer equipped with a flat fan nozzle delivering 450 L ha−1 at 275 kPa. After spraying, weeds were transferred to a greenhouse. Aboveground shoots were harvested 21 DAT, dried at 80 °C for 72 h, and the dry weights were recorded. Each treatment had three replicates, and the experiment was performed twice.
Data from the repeated experiments were analyzed using ANOVA with SPSS software (version 22.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and there was no significant (p < 0.05) trial-by-treatment interaction between the repeated experiments. Data were pooled and fitted to a nonlinear regression analysis using SigmaPlot (version 13.0; Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The herbicide dose causing 50% growth reduction (GR50) was evaluated using a four-parameter log-logistic equation as follows:
y = c + (d − c)/(1 + (x/GR50)b)
where c is the lower limit, d is the upper limit, b is the slope of GR50, x is the independent variable (herbicide dose), and y is the dependent variable (percentage of dry weight). The resistance index (RI) was calculated as the ratio of MR GR50 to S GR50.

4.3. ALS Gene Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaf tissues of each B. japonicus plant at the three- to four-leaf stage using an EasyPure Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TranGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The primers used to amplify the B. japonicus ALS gene fragment and the PCR protocol have been described by Li et al. [33]. The amplification products were purified using an EasyPure Quick Gel Extraction Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and sequenced by GENEWIZ Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The ALS gene was aligned and compared using DNAMAN v.6.0.3 software (Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, QC, Canada).

4.4. UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Mesosulfuron-methyl Residue in B. japonicus Plants

Mesosulfuron-methyl (4 μg per plant) was applied to B. japonicus plants of MR and S populations at the three- to four-leaf stage using micropipettes. Ten plants were randomly collected from the MR and S B. japonicus populations at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT. These plants were thoroughly washed with 20 mL acetonitrile, and subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at −20 °C. Mesosulfuron-methyl extraction and residue analysis were performed as previously reported [26]. Validation of the analytical methods is presented in Table S1 and Figure S5. The absorption rate was calculated by dividing the amount of absorbed mesosulfuron-methyl by the applied amount of mesosulfuron-methyl, multiplied by 100%, while the metabolism rate was determined by dividing the metabolized amount of mesosulfuron-methyl by the absorbed amount, also multiplied by 100%. Each treatment had three replicates, and the experiment was performed twice.

4.5. Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing

Leaf samples were collected from herbicide-treated and untreated plants 24 h after the application of mesosulfuron-methyl (T; 9 g a.i. ha−1). Each treatment had three biological replicates, and 12 samples were collected (three biological replicates × two treatments × two populations). All samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.
Total RNA was extracted using Transzol Up (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and treated with DNase I (Takara, Beijing, China). RNA quality was monitored using 1% agarose gels, a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and an RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). High-quality RNA was used for cDNA library construction, Illumina sequencing, and isoform sequencing (Iso-Seq) by Biomarket Technologies Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) using the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Oligo (dT)-enriched RNA with a PolyA tail was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a SMARTer PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit. The cDNA was then amplified and purified using 0.8X AMPure PB beads (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, USA) for the construction of PacBio full-length Iso-Seq libraries. After screening the fragments, an SMRTbell Template Prep kit (version 2.0) was used to construct the SMRTbell library for damage repair and end repair. After the library was quantified, a PacBio Binding Kit was used to combine the library template and enzyme complex, which were then transferred to the nanopores of a PacBio Sequel II sequencer for computer sequencing. The transcripts of the full-length sequences were used to predict open reading frames (ORFs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and the transcriptome data of the second generation were used for transcriptome quantitative, differential, and functional enrichment analyses.
To refine protein-coding sequence (CDS) prediction for redundant transcripts, we utilized TransDecoder (version 3.0.1). Among the transcripts, six open reading frames (ORFs) exceeding 300 bp in length and possessing a positive log-likelihood score for their approximate function were evaluated. The ORF with the highest score among those retained in the CDS was chosen, and specifically, the longest ORF transcripts were selected for further redundancy analysis. Gene function was annotated using eight publicly accessible databases: NCBI nonredundant protein sequences (NR), a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database (Swiss-Prot), Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), euKaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG), Protein Family (PFAM), Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and evolutionary genealogy of genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups (eggNOG). Next, GO annotation and functional classification were implemented using Blast2GO and WeGO software, respectively. Pathways were assigned using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/) (accessed on 9 October 2023).

4.6. Identification and Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

Full-length transcripts served as the reference to identify differentially expressed transcripts between the comparison groups. Second-generation sequencing data were used for comparison and quantification, and the quantitative read count was used to compare the differences between groups. Differential expression abundance for each gene per transcript between sample pairs was calculated using DESeq2 v.1.4.5. Genes with a |log2(foldchange)| ≥ 1 and a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01 were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Comparisons of expression differences were conducted between untreated MR and untreated S samples at time 0 (MR_CK and S_CK), and between MR and S samples at 24 h post mesosulfuron-methyl treatment (MR_T and S_T). Further comparisons were made between MR and S samples for both untreated (CK) and treated (T) conditions. DEGs were further analyzed through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses using a hypergeometric test, with GO or KEGG terms considered significantly enriched if q < 0.05.

4.7. Selection and Validation of Candidate Metabolic Resistance Genes

We selected 15 overlapping genes identified as mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism-related genes using transcriptome annotation that were significantly upregulated in MR_T relative to S_T and in MR_T relative to MR_CK. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase genes (GAPDH, JN599100.1) were chosen as an internal control to measure gene expression and as internal control genes to ensure the reliability of qRT-PCR [62]. Gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The 20 µL mixture reaction contained 10 µL of SYBR Mix, 0.6 µL of forward primer, 0.6 µL of reverse primer, 1 µL of cDNA, 0.4 µL of ROX Reference Dye, and 7.4 µL of RNase-free ddH2O, and there were three replicates per cDNA sample. The qRT-PCR programs were as follows: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. To ensure primer specificity, melting curve analysis was conducted at the reaction’s end, with a similar amplification efficiency observed for both target and internal control genes. Fold change in gene expression was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method, expressed as 2−ΔCT.
Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) in SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
The expression patterns of these genes were measured using qRT-PCR using the original RNA samples used for RNA-Seq. Then they were also examined in the other plants of MR and S populations as parallel materials collected at 72 h after mesosulfuron-methyl treatment [26,63].

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study demonstrated that B. japonicus population TJ07 has P450-involved metabolic resistance and ABC transporter-involved protective resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl. RNA-Seq and full-length transcriptome analyses provided abundant gene information on herbicide metabolism and revealed the genes related to mesosulfuron-methyl metabolism in a B. japonicus subpopulation with two generations of herbicide selection. Metabolic resistance in TJ07 is likely to be comprehensively regulated by multiple genes, including P450s, GSTs, GTs, and ABC transporters. Future studies should aim to elucidate these relationships.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13131751/s1: Figure S1: Species distributions of the BLASTX matches of B. japonicus transcriptome genes; Figure S2: GO function classification of the annotated genes in B. japonicus. The genes were allocated to three categories: cellular component, molecular function, and biological process; Figure S3: KEGG function classification results of the annotated genes in B. japonicus. The y-axis lists the various KEGG pathways. The x-axis indicates the number of genes. According to their participation in these KEGG pathways; the genes were divided into five color-coded groups: metabolism, genetic information processing, cellular processes, environmental information processing, and organismal systems; Figure S4: The annotated DEGs between the MR_T vs. S_T samples using GO (A) and KEGG (B) enrichment analyses; Figure S5: Typical chromatograms of mesosulfuron-methyl from extracted B. japonicus samples; Table S1: The analysis method of mesosulfuron-methyl in B. japonicus using QuEChERS and UPLC-MS/MS was validated in terms of its linearity, limit of quantification (LOQ), accuracy, and precision; Table S2: Primer pairs used for qRT-PCR relative quantification of gene expression in B. japonicus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and Y.L.; methodology, H.W.; software, J.Y.; validation, Q.L., H.W. and J.Y.; formal analysis, Q.L. and W.G.; investigation, W.Z.; resources, Q.L.; data curation, J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L.; writing—review and editing, H.W. and W.G.; funding acquisition, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Tianjin Natural Science Foundation, grant number 23JCQNJC00450 and the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China, grant number 2021CXGC010811.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oerke, E.C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 144, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Powles, S. Global herbicide resistance challenge. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Délye, C.; Jasieniuk, M.; Corre, V. Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trends Genet. 2013, 29, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Powles, S.B.; Yu, Q. Evolution in action: Plants resistant to herbicides. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 317–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Preston, C. Herbicide resistance in weeds endowed by enhanced detoxification: Complications for management. Weed Sci. 2004, 52, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, J.S.; Tranel, P.J.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Non-target-site herbicide resistance: A family business. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Délye, C. Unravelling the genetic bases of non-target-site-based resistance (NTSR) to herbicides: A major challenge for weed science in the forthcoming decade. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Q.; Powles, S.B. Metabolism-based herbicide resistance and cross-resistance in crop weeds: A threat to herbicide sustainability and global crop production. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, Q.; Powles, S.B. Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: Current understanding. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1340–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sen, M.K.; Hamouzova, K.; Mikulka, J.; Bharati, R.; Kosnarova, P.; Hamouz, P.; Roy, A.; Soukup, J. Enhanced metabolism and target gene overexpression confer resistance against acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Bromus sterilis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 2122–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petit, C.; Duhieu, B.; Boucansaud, K.; Délye, C. Complex genetic control of non-target-site-based resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetylcoenzyme a carboxylase and acetolactate-synthase in Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. Plant Sci. 2010, 178, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dasgupta, K.; Ganesan, S.; Manivasagam, S.; Ayre, B.G. A cytochrome P450 monooxygenase commonly used for negative selection in transgenic plants causes growth anomalies by disrupting brassinosteroid signaling. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vila-Aiub, M.M.; Neve, P.; Powles, S.B. Resistance cost of a cytochrome P450 herbicide metabolism mechanism but not an ACCase target site mutation in a multiple resistant Lolium rigidum population. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beckie, H.J.; Tardif, F.J. Herbicide cross resistance in weeds. Crop Prot. 2012, 35, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Unver, T.; Bakar, M.; Shearman, R.C.; Budak, H. Genome-wide profiling and analysis of Festuca arundinacea miRNAs and transcriptomes in response to foliar glyphosate application. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2010, 283, 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. An, J.; Shen, X.; Ma, Q.; Yang, C.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y. Transcriptome profiling to discover putative genes associated with paraquat resistance in goosegrass (Eleusine indica L.). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Metzker, M.L. Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gaines, T.A.; Lorentz, L.; Figge, A.; Herrmann, J.; Maiwald, F.; Ott, M.C.; Han, H.; Busi, R.; Yu, Q.; Powles, S.B. RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis to identify genes involved in metabolism-based diclofop resistance in Lolium rigidum. Plant J. 2014, 78, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Türktaş, M.; Kurtoğlu, K.Y.; Dorado, G.; Zhang, B.; Hernandez, P.; Ünver, T. Sequencing of plant genomes? A review. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2015, 39, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duhoux, A.; Carrere, S.; Gouzy, J.; Bonin, L.; Délye, C. RNASeq analysis of rye-grass transcriptomic response to an herbicide inhibiting acetolactate-synthase identifies transcripts linked to non-target-site-based resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duhoux, A.; Carrère, S.; Duhoux, A.; Délye, C. Transcriptional markers enable identification of rye-grass (Lolium sp.) plants with non-target-site-based resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate-synthase. Plant Sci. 2017, 257, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gardin, J.A.; Gouzy, J.; Carrere, S.; Délye, C. ALOMYbase, a resource to investigate non-target-site-based resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate-synthase (ALS) in the major grass weed Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pan, L.; Gao, H.; Xia, W.; Zhang, T.; Dong, L. Establishing an herbicide-metabolizing enzyme library in Beckmannia syzigachne to identify genes associated with metabolic resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Q.; Deng, W.; Li, X.; Yu, Q.; Bai, L.; Zheng, M. Target-site and non-target-site based resistance to the herbicide tribenuronmethyl in flixweed (Descurainia sophia L.). BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, N.; Li, W.; Bai, S.; Guo, W.L.; Yuan, G.H.; Wang, F.; Liu, W.T.; Wang, J.X. Transcriptome Profiling to Identify Genes Involved in Mesosulfuron-Methyl Resistance in Alopecurus aequalis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bai, S.; Liu, W.T.; Wang, H.; Zhao, N.; Jia, S.; Zou, N.; Guo, W.L.; Wang, J.X. Enhanced Herbicide Metabolism and Metabolic Resistance Genes Identified in Tribenuron-Methyl Resistant Myosoton aquaticum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9850–9857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chao, Q.; Gao, Z.F.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, B.G.; Dong, F.Q.; Fu, C.X.; Liu, L.J.; Wang, B.C. The developmental dynamics of the Populus stem transcriptome. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Bei, F.; Wu, C.; Zhang, L.; Jia, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, W. Investigating the Mechanism of Metabolic Resistance to Tribenuron-Methyl in Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. by Full-Length Transcriptome Assembly Combined with RNA-Seq. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3692–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Q.; Tan, J.N.; Li, W.; Yuan, G.H.; Du, L.; Ma, S.; Wang, J.X. Effects of environmental factors on seed germination and emergence of Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus). Weed Sci. 2015, 63, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Ecology of germination and flowering in the weedy winter annual grass Bromus japonicus. J. Range Manag. 1981, 34, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Q.; Du, L.; Yuan, G.H.; Guo, W.L.; Li, W.; Wang, J.X. Density effect and economic threshold of Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus Houtt.) in wheat. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 76, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Q.; Yu, J.; Du, L.; Bai, P.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus Thunb. ex Murr.) populations in China. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2024, 38, 2326810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Q.; Yu, J.; Guo, W.; Du, L.; Bai, P.; Liu, Y. Target-site basis for resistance to flucarbazone-sodium in Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus Houtt.) in China. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 82, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, L.; Wu, L.; Li, Z.; Fang, Y.; Ju, B.; Zhang, S.; Bai, L.; Pan, L. The Pro-197-Thr mutation in the ALS gene confers novel resistance patterns to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in Bromus japonicus in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1348815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Huang, Z.F.; Sui, B.F.; Zhang, C.X.; Huang, H.J.; Wei, S.H. The basis of resistance mechanism to mesosulfuron-methyl in Tausch’s goatgrass (Aegilops tauschii Coss.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 155, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kuk, Y.I.; Bugos, N.R. Cross-resistance profile of mesosulfuron-methyl-resistant Italian ryegrass in the southern United States. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bi, Y.L.; Liu, W.T.; Li, L.X.; Yuan, G.H.; Jin, T.; Wang, J.X. Molecular basis of resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl in Japanese foxtail, Alopecurus japonicus. J. Pestic. Sci. 2013, 38, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.Z.; Cao, W.F.; Guo, Q.S.; Yang, Y.; Bai, L.Y.; Pan, L. Resistance to mesosulfuron-methyl in Beckmannia syzigachne may involve ROS burst and non-target-site resistance mechanisms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 229, 113072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Giacomini, D.A.; Gaines, T.; Beffa, R.; Tranel, P.J. Optimizing RNA-seq studies to investigate herbicide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2260–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, N.; Yang, J.J.; Jiang, M.H.; Liao, M.; Cao, H.Q. Identification of essential genes involved in metabolism-based resistance mechanism to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in Polypogon fugax. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 1164–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Steijger, T.; Abril, J.F.; Abril, J.F.; Engström, P.G.; Kokocinski, F.; Hubbard, T.J.; Guigó, R.; Harrow, J.; Bertone, P. Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Hamilton, M.; Jacobi, J.L.; Ngam, P.; Devitt, N.; Schilkey, F.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S.N. A survey of the sorghum transcriptome using single- molecule long reads. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, B.; Tseng, E.; Regulski, M.; Clark, T.A.; Hon, T.; Jiao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Olson, A.; Stein, J.C.; Ware, D. Unveiling the complexity of the maize transcriptome by single-molecule long-read sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hrycay, E.G.; Bandiera, S.M. Monooxygenase, Peroxidase and Peroxygenase Properties and Reaction Mechanisms of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 851, pp. 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dimaano, N.G.; Iwakami, S. Cytochrome P450-mediated herbicide metabolism in plants: Current understanding and prospects. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Siminszky, B.; Corbin, F.T.R.; Ward, E.; Fleischmann, T.J.; Dewey, R.E. Expression of a soybean cytochrome P450 monooxygenase cDNA in yeast and tobacco enhances the metabolism of phenylurea herbicides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1750–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thyssen, G.N.; Naoumkina, M.; McCarty, J.C.; Jenkins, J.N.; Florane, C.; Li, P.; Fang, D.D. The P450 gene CYP749A16 is required for tolerance to the sulfonylurea herbicide trifloxysulfuron sodium in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiang, W.; Wang, X.; Ren, T. Expression of a wheat cytochrome P450 monooxygenase cDNA in yeast catalyzes the metabolism of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 85, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hofer, R.; Boachon, B.; Renault, H.; Gavira, C.; Miesch, L.; Iglesias, J.; Ginglinger, J.F.; Allouche, L.; Miesch, M.; Grec, S.; et al. Dual function of the CYP76 family from Arabidopsis thaliana in the metabolism of monoterpenols and phenylurea herbicides. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nakka, S.; Godar, A.S.; Thompson, C.R.; Peterson, D.E.; Jugulam, M. Rapid detoxification via glutathione S-transferase (GST) conjugation confers a high level of atrazine resistance in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 2236–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sylvestre-Gonon, E.; Law, S.R.; Schwartz, M.; Robe, K.; Keech, O.; Didierjean, C.; Dubos, C.; Rouhier, N.; Hecker, A. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Labrou, N.E.; Papageorgiou, A.C.; Pavli, O.; Flemetakis, E. Plant GSTome: Structure and functional role in xenome network and plant stress response. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rahantaniaina, M.S.; Li, S.; Chatel-Innocenti, G.; Tuzet, A.; Issakidis-Bourguet, E.; Mhamdi, A.; Noctor, G. Cytosolic and Chloroplastic DHARs Cooperate in Oxidative Stress-Driven Activation of the Salicylic Acid Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 956–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Del Buono, D.; Ioli, G.; Nasini, L.; Proietti, P. A comparative study on the interference of two herbicides in wheat and italian ryegrass and on their antioxidant activities and detoxification rates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 12109–12115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Manabe, Y.; Tinker, N.; Colville, A.; Miki, B. CSR1, the sole target of imidazolinone herbicide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 1340–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bai, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Luo, X.; Li, L. Identification and expression of main genes involved in non-target site resistance mechanisms to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl in Beckmannia syzigachne. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2619–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Brazier, M.; Cole, D.J.; Edwards, R. O-Glucosyltransferase activities toward phenolic natural products and xenobiotics in wheat and herbicide-resistant and herbicide-susceptible black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Phytochemistry 2002, 59, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rea, P.A. Plant ATP-binding cassette transporters. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 347–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cagnac, O.; Bourbouloux, A.; Chakrabarty, D.; Zhang, M.Y.; Delrot, S. AtOPT6 transports glutathione derivatives and is induced by primisulfuron. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pan, L.; Yu, Q.; Wang, J.; Han, H.; Mao, L.; Nyporko, A.; Maguza, A.; Fan, L.J.; Bai, L.Y.; Powles, S.B. An ABCC-type transporter endowing glyphosate resistance in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2100136118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, S.; Liu, M.; Chen, W.; Bai, D.; Liao, Y.; Bai, L.; Pan, L. Eleusine indica Cytochrome P450 and Glutathione S-Transferase Are Linked to High-Level Resistance to Glufosinate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 14243–14250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Petit, C.; Pernin, F.; Heydel, J.M.; Délye, C. Validation of a set of reference genes to study response to herbicide stress in grasses. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, W.; Bai, S.; Zhao, N.; Jia, S.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Non-target site-based resistance to tribenuron-methyl and essential involved genes in Myosoton aquaticum (L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Dose–response curves depicting the dry weight of B. japonicus populations, MR (TJ07) and S (TJ01), were generated following treatment with various mesosulfuron-methyl dosages, both with (+) and without the addition of 1000 g a.i. ha−1 of malathion. The presented values are normalized to represent the percentage relative to the untreated control. Each data point represents the mean ± SE derived from two replicated experiments. The lines were fitted based on these mean values for clarity and accuracy by “four-parameter log-logistic equation”.
Figure 1. Dose–response curves depicting the dry weight of B. japonicus populations, MR (TJ07) and S (TJ01), were generated following treatment with various mesosulfuron-methyl dosages, both with (+) and without the addition of 1000 g a.i. ha−1 of malathion. The presented values are normalized to represent the percentage relative to the untreated control. Each data point represents the mean ± SE derived from two replicated experiments. The lines were fitted based on these mean values for clarity and accuracy by “four-parameter log-logistic equation”.
Plants 13 01751 g001
Figure 2. Mesosulfuron-methyl absorption rate in S (susceptible) and MR (resistant) B. japonicus at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT. The absorption rate was calculated by dividing the absorption amount of mesosulfuron-methyl by the application amount of mesosulfuron-methyl multiplied by 100%.
Figure 2. Mesosulfuron-methyl absorption rate in S (susceptible) and MR (resistant) B. japonicus at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT. The absorption rate was calculated by dividing the absorption amount of mesosulfuron-methyl by the application amount of mesosulfuron-methyl multiplied by 100%.
Plants 13 01751 g002
Figure 3. The metabolism rate of mesosulfuron-methyl in both susceptible (S) and resistant (MR) populations of B. japonicus at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT was determined by dividing the metabolized quantity of mesosulfuron-methyl by the absorbed amount, and then multiplying by 100%.
Figure 3. The metabolism rate of mesosulfuron-methyl in both susceptible (S) and resistant (MR) populations of B. japonicus at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 DAT was determined by dividing the metabolized quantity of mesosulfuron-methyl by the absorbed amount, and then multiplying by 100%.
Plants 13 01751 g003
Figure 4. Statistics of the DEGs between the B. japonicus treatment groups. (A) The number of DEGs between the different groups. (B) Venn diagram showing the number of DEGs between MR (TJ07) and S (TJ01) samples in the three treatment comparisons.
Figure 4. Statistics of the DEGs between the B. japonicus treatment groups. (A) The number of DEGs between the different groups. (B) Venn diagram showing the number of DEGs between MR (TJ07) and S (TJ01) samples in the three treatment comparisons.
Plants 13 01751 g004
Table 1. GR50 values of susceptible (S) and resistant (MR) B. japonicus populations’ response to mesosulfuron-methyl with or without malathion pre-treatment.
Table 1. GR50 values of susceptible (S) and resistant (MR) B. japonicus populations’ response to mesosulfuron-methyl with or without malathion pre-treatment.
HerbicideGR50 ± SE (g a.i. ha−1) 1RI 2
SMR
Mesosulfuron-methyl0.90 ± 0.17 a 346.64 ± 3.63 a 51.8
Mesosulfuron-methyl + Malathion0.59 ± 0.21 a7.83 ± 1.40 b13.3
1 GR50, herbicide dose causing 50% growth reduction in B. japonicus; SE, standard error: n = 6. 2 Resistance index (RI) = GR50(MR)/GR50(S). 3 Means with different letters in a row for each herbicide are significantly different by the Tukey’s HSD test (α = 0.05).
Table 2. Sequence alignment and deduced amino acid of the resistant and susceptible B. japonicus populations.
Table 2. Sequence alignment and deduced amino acid of the resistant and susceptible B. japonicus populations.
PopulationThe Amino Acid Position, Relative Nucleotide, and Amino Acid
122197205376377574653654
TJ01GCACCTGCGGATCGTTGGAGTGGT
AlaProAlaAspArgTrpSerGly
TJ07GCACCTGCGGATCGTTGGAGTGGT
AlaProAlaAspArgTrpSerGly
Note: the amino acid sequence is based on the ALS sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana (AY042819.1); the mutated amino acid and corresponding codon are underlined.
Table 3. Sequence annotation of the B. japonicus transcriptome.
Table 3. Sequence annotation of the B. japonicus transcriptome.
Public DatabaseNumber of TranscriptsPercentage (%)
Annotated in NR33,07699.56
Annotated in Swiss-Prot22,71268.37
Annotated in KEGG14,19942.74
Annotated in KOG19,47658.63
Annotated in eggNOG31,85695.89
Annotated in PFAM24,83574.76
Annotated in GO27,31282.21
Annotated in COG13,72841.32
Table 4. The fifteen enriched KEGG pathway terms of the DEGs between mesosulfuron-methyl-treated MR and S B. japonicus populations.
Table 4. The fifteen enriched KEGG pathway terms of the DEGs between mesosulfuron-methyl-treated MR and S B. japonicus populations.
KEGG Pathway TermMap IDGene Count 1Genes in Background 2p-Value
UpDown
Starch and sucrose metabolismmap0050081753582.85 × 10−3
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesismap0094051532031.00 × 10−5
Cyanoamino acid metabolismmap0046035431331.37 × 10−7
Glutathione metabolismmap0048034652097.09 × 10−4
Cysteine and methionine metabolismmap0027034562051.62 × 10−2
Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotesmap0300831591942.65 × 10−3
Fatty acid degradationmap0007128201001.16 × 10−2
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesismap0097027351182.45 × 10−4
Photosynthesis—antenna proteinsmap0019624451401.20 × 10−3
alpha-Linolenic acid metabolismmap0059223271026.12 × 10−3
Sulfur metabolismmap0092023281057.11 × 10−3
Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesismap001302121824.33 × 10−3
beta-Alanine metabolismmap004101724831.05 × 10−2
Isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesismap009501415561.35 × 10−2
Monoterpenoid biosynthesismap0090257157.35 × 10−4
1 Number of up- and downregulated genes enriched in this pathway. 2 Number of genes annotated in this pathway.
Table 5. Identification of upregulated genes related to metabolic-resistance in B. japonicus by RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR (2−ΔCt) 1.
Table 5. Identification of upregulated genes related to metabolic-resistance in B. japonicus by RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR (2−ΔCt) 1.
Gene IDPFAM IDFunction AnnotationRNA-SeqqRT-PCR (2−ΔCt)
log2 Fold Change
(MR_T vs. S_T)
PadjRNA-Seq
Samples
(MR_T vs. S_T)
Additional
Samples
(MR_T vs. S_T)
E_transcript_38404PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C42.187.30 × 10−151.012.28
E_transcript_8113PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C42.411.56 × 10−262.86 *6.60 *
E_transcript_31473PF00067.21CytP450, CYP90B11.295.11 × 10−61.0358.42
E_transcript_5503PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C12.251.03 × 10−210.7143.16
E_transcript_6685PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C21.895.02 × 10−160.60 *20.76
E_transcript_13219PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C22.161.10 × 10−190.65 *3.05 *
E_transcript_5754PF00067.21CytP450, CYP90D21.021.51 × 10−41.29 *9.37 *
E_transcript_48605PF00067.21CytP450, CYP71C2.735.75 × 10−200.76 *8.11
E_transcript_71401PF00067.21CytP450, CYP72A152.272.22 × 10−237.13 *14.27 *
E_transcript_44243PF02798.19GST, MEE6.281.254.63 × 10−71.71 *9.12 *
E_transcript_14304PF13410.5GST, GSTZ58.121.72 × 10−1503.31 *18.27 *
E_transcript_38926PF02798.19GST, PUR71.435.46 × 10−71.77 *37.08
E_transcript_56910PF00201.17UDP-glucosyl transferase, SGT312.842.26 × 10−175.17 *5.50 *
E_transcript_53473PF00005.26ABC transporter, ABCC101.526.64 × 10−61.62 *20.18 *
E_transcript_71047PF00005.26ABC transporter, ABCC26.895.78 × 10−1182.72 *1.47 *
E_transcript_5168PF03109.15ABC1 family, At5g052001.202.21 × 10−41.133.24
E_transcript_15373PF01786.16Oxidase, MCB17.111.302.48 × 10−62.532.66
E_transcript_48732PF00724.19Oxidase, OPR111.731.31 × 10−111.21 *1.58 *
E_transcript_65166PF12697.6Hydrolase1.622.54 × 10−63.342.68
E_transcript_19506PF01738.17Hydrolase1.206.84 × 10−31.263.42
E_transcript_38621PF01156.18Hydrolase1.612.09 × 10−42.23 *4.83 *
1 MR_T, resistant B. japonicus plants treated with mesosulfuron-methyl. S_T, susceptible B. japonicus plants treated with mesosulfuron-methyl. The obtained p-value was adjusted and represented as the q-value through application of the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, aiming to effectively manage the false discovery rate. * Significant differences between MR_T and S_T at a 0.05 level according to Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, W.; Guo, W.; Liu, Y. Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance to Mesosulfuron-methyl and Identification of Candidate Genes in Bromus japonicus. Plants 2024, 13, 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131751

AMA Style

Li Q, Wang H, Yu J, Zhang W, Guo W, Liu Y. Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance to Mesosulfuron-methyl and Identification of Candidate Genes in Bromus japonicus. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qi, Hengzhi Wang, Jinping Yu, Wei Zhang, Wenlei Guo, and Yixue Liu. 2024. "Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance to Mesosulfuron-methyl and Identification of Candidate Genes in Bromus japonicus" Plants 13, no. 13: 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131751

APA Style

Li, Q., Wang, H., Yu, J., Zhang, W., Guo, W., & Liu, Y. (2024). Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance to Mesosulfuron-methyl and Identification of Candidate Genes in Bromus japonicus. Plants, 13(13), 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131751

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop