Next Article in Journal
High Temperature Alters Phenology, Seed Development and Yield in Three Rice Varieties
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Sagittaria trifolia L. to Phytotoxic Ethyl Acetate Fungal Extract from Curvularia lunata Strain CLST-01
Previous Article in Journal
Ozone and Temperature May Hinder Adaptive Capacity of Mediterranean Perennial Grasses to Future Global Change Scenarios
Previous Article in Special Issue
Colletotrichum echinochloae: A Potential Bioherbicide Agent for Control of Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Mycotoxin Fumagillin, Mevastatin, Radicicol, and Wortmannin on Photosynthesis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

by Jiale Shi 1,†, Mengyun Jiang 1,†, He Wang 1, Zhi Luo 1, Yanjing Guo 1, Ying Chen 1, Xiaoxi Zhao 1, Sheng Qiang 1, Reto Jörg Strasser 1,2, Hazem M. Kalaji 3 and Shiguo Chen 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioherbicide Development for Weed Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

1. check Mevastatin line 72

2. check figure 2 title

3. check statistics: ANOVA was not employed as stated

4. concentration choice? – Did the effects depend on the concentration? Please, add the information. 

5. Mycotoxins as poisons is a bad choice for direct application of pesticides. Could you stress that these compounds will be just a model for the synthesis? Please, add the information, if appropriate.

6. Did you assay the algal growth inhibition or phytotoxicity to plants treated with the 4 mycotoxins used in this study? Is there correlation between ChlA inhibition and the phytotoxicity? Please, add the information.

7. In your this and previous research many compounds (different mycotoxins)  affected D1 protein. What a mechanism or explanation? Please, add the information or your opinion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

The manuscript entitled "Effects of Mycotoxin Fumagillin, Mevastatin, Radicicol and Wortmannin on Photosynthesis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii" adds valuable information regarding the effects of mycotoxins on PSII, suggesting the development of novel herbicides. 

The introduction is well-written and organized and it was easy to read. I really enjoyed reading it. The material and methods are also well described which explains all the methodology adopted by the authors to conduct the whole experiment. The results and discussion also present timely information and adequate references.

I recommend the authors to check all figures' citations that must be added to the text before the figure appears.

There are some minor corrections that I have added in the PDF version.

Kind Regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much. We are truly appreciative of the reviewer’s enthusiasm and encouraging comments, which were very helpful in revising the manuscript.

We have made changes based on your friendly suggestions and highlighted them with tracking changes.

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript “Effects of mycotoxin fumagillin, mevastatin, radicicol and wortmannin on photosynthesis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii” gives very interesting study that investigated impact of four mycotoxins on photosynthesis. In the study it is found that mycotoxins affect photosynthesis, and therefore their chemical structure can provide ideas for discovering new herbicides.

In the study state-of-the-art methods were used, and several endpoints were assessed. Clear conclusions based on obtained results were made. There are only some minor comments that authors could introduce in the manuscript.

 Minor comments

In the manuscript it is not explained why Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is used for experiments.

Check Figure 2 caption. “Chemical structure of four mycotoxins” should be omitted.

Author Response

RE: We thank the reviewer for his general appreciation. As explained below, we have revised the manuscript in light of these helpful comments. We would like to also thank this reviewer for his effort in the whole review process.

Minor comments

In the manuscript it is not explained why Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is used for experiments.

RE: Thanks. Line 108-111 in track changes version.

Check Figure 2 caption. “Chemical structure of four mycotoxins” should be omitted.

RE: Thanks. Line 134 in track changes version.

Back to TopTop