Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Influence of Biodiversity on Soil Respiration in a Temperate Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Characterization of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Gene Family and Their Expression Patterns in Response to Drought and Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides in Walnut (Juglans regia)
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Flavonoids and Bioactivity Features of Pericarp of Citrus reticulata “Chachi” at Different Harvest Periods
Previous Article in Special Issue
MIR390 Is Involved in Regulating Anthracnose Resistance in Apple
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MdWRKY120 Enhance Apple Susceptibility to Alternaria alternata

1
College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2
School of Horticulture, Liaoning Vocational College of Ecological Engineering, Shenyang 110101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3389; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233389
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics of Disease Resistance in Fruits)

Abstract

:
Alternaria alternata (A. alternata) is a common pathogen that greatly influences apples’ quantity and quality. However, chemical treatments produce increased health risks along with decreased food and environmental safety. Advancements in plant molecular biology, such as transgenic technology, have increased apple trees’ resistance to pathogens and have therefore attracted widespread attention. WRKY transcription factors are involved in abiotic and biotic stress regulation; however, their biological role in non-model plants such as apple, is still unknown. In this investigation, MdWRKY120 was isolated from the ‘GL-3′ apple to determine its function during Alternaria alternate infection. The MdWRKY120-GFP fusion protein was located in the nucleus. MdWRKY120 in yeast cells exhibited activating transcriptional activity, meaning it is a transcription activator. MdWRKY120 overexpression transgenic plants were more sensitive to A. alternata, while RNAi transgenic plants showed increased resistance to A. alternata. This investigation demonstrates that MdWRKY120 enhances the susceptibility of apples to A. alternata.

1. Introduction

Apple (Malus × domestica) is among the most important fruit crops, belongs to the family Rosaceae, and is widely cultivated globally due to its elevated nutritional and economic values. However, various fungal diseases seriously threaten the yield and quality of apples all around the world [1]. Apple Alternaria leaf spot is a fungal disease caused by the Alternaria alternata (A. alternata) and is one of the most serious diseases that affect apple [2]. Circular black or brownish leaf spots cause defoliation and reduce photosynthesis, fruit quality, and apple production [3]. Currently, chemical treatments are the main methods to control the disease; however, these treatments produce food safety concerns and environmental pollution. Sustainable crop production and minimal chemical use against plant-pathogen interactions have attracted great attention. Although extensive breeding studies have been conducted, the knowledge of genetic understanding of pathogen defense is still limited. Further, since apples have a long breeding cycle, little progress has been made in this field. Therefore, it is important to find disease-resistant genes and explore the potential molecular mechanisms associated with their anti-infection activity.
The WRKY family is an important transcription factor family in higher plants, regulating growth and development [4]. The WRKY transcription factor contains at least 1~60 amino acids-long conserved domain of WRKY, a highly conserved N-terminal heptapeptide called WRKYGQK, and a C-terminal-, C2H2-, or C2HC-type zinc finger structure [5]. Based on the number of WRKY conserved domains and the type of zinc finger structure, the WRKY transcription factors are classified into three groups [6]. Genome sequencing has helped identify many WRKY gene families in various crops. Arabidopsis thaliana consists of 75 genes [7], the apple of 127 genes [8], maize of 119 genes [9], and rice of 103 genes [10]. The WRKY family is crucial for regulating biotic and abiotic stress, such as drought [11], salt stress [12], disease resistance [13], seed germination [14], and flower development [15].
As has been recently reported, WRKY40s are essential for plant immune response. WRKY protein’s function against biotic stresses in horticultural plant species has also been studied. In pepper immunity, WRKY40 directly regulates ChiIV3 expression level, thereby significantly increasing its resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum [16]. It was also found that, in the resistant (WR315) plants, there was WRKY40 up-regulation under Fusarium stress, whereas, in susceptible (JG62) plants, it lacked expression. Furthermore, in Arabidopsis, heterologous chickpea WRKY40 over-expression stimulated an immune response against Pseudomonas syringae [17]. In Arabidopsis, simultaneous WRKY18 and WRKY40 mutations render otherwise susceptible wild-type species resistant to the Golovinomyces orontii, a biotrophic powdery mildew fungus [18]. In some species, WRKY40 is reported to have opposite regulations; for instance, the GhWRKY40 transcription levels in cotton increased after bacterial pathogen R. solanacearum infection, and it improved most of the defense-associated genes, increased the wounding tolerance, and the resisitance to R. solanacearum [19]. Overall, WRKY40 significantly regulates a variety of plant stress responses; however, little is known about its function in apples against A. alternata.
In our previous study, we found that AtWRKY40 and MdWRKY120 are homologous genes and, thus, it was hypothesized that they have similar functions. Therefore, this study is focused on MdWRKY120, which was expressed in all the studied tissues and was relatively high in the fruit and root. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) labeled MdWRKY120 protein was localized in the nucleus and displayed transcriptional activity in yeast cells. When non-transformed plants were compared with overly expressed MdWRKY120 plants, the latter were more susceptible to A. alternata. Overall, MdWRKY120 is crucial for regulating A. alternata resistance in apples. This study on MdWRKY120 against A. alternata resistance will pave the foundation for the molecular genetic breeding of apple disease resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of MdWRKY120 in Apple

The apple’s transcription factor MdWRKY120 gene sequence was downloaded from the JGI database (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/ accessed on 2 November 2022). To investigate the evolutionary association between MdWRKY120 and other WRKY proteins, a phylogenetic evaluation was carried out of MEGA 6.06 software by the Neighbor-Joining method. As indicated by Figure 1a, MdWRKY120 is closely related to PbWRKY120 in pear. The sequence alignment of MdWRKY120 amino acid and other WRKY120 proteins revealed one shared conversed WRKY domain (Figure 1b). Since the WRKY120 transition factor is involved in pathogen defense and stress response, its close homology in various species may indicate some similar functions, especially in A. alternate defense, and some of these proteins are reported to take part in plantss defense against bacteria [17] and fungi [18].

2.2. Expression of MdWRKY120 in Multiple Organs

For elucidating MdWRKY120 expression levels in various tissues, real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using four-year-old ‘GL-3’ trees. The results indicated that MdWRKY120 was expressed in different tissues, including flower, stem, leaf, root, and fruit, with the highest levels in the fruit (Figure 2).
To determine the mechanism responsible for MdWRKY120′s expression patterns, its promoter region of 1591 bp was evaluated. The Plant CARE database predicted various response elements for biotic and abiotic stresses, such as hormone responses, tissue-specific expression, light, and development, as shown in Table S2. The core W-box, GARE cis-acting elements were found in the MdWRKY120 promoter region. The data collected from the above experiments suggested that MdWRKY120 may be involved in defense and stress.

2.3. Subcellular Localization of MdWRKY120

It was reported that most WRKYs were nucleus-localized proteins [20]. To elucidate whether MdWRKY120 was a nuclear protein like other WRKYs, the MdWRKY120 coding sequence was attached to the pRI-GFP via the CaMV 35S promoter, followed by transient expression of the MdWRKY120-GFP fusion gene in tobacco leaves. As indicated by Figure 3, the MdWRKY120-GFP fusion protein’s signals were limited to the nucleus, whereas the positive control GFP signals were expressed throughout the cell, proving that MdWRKY120 was localized in the nucleus and is thus a nuclear protein.

2.4. Transcription Activation Analysis of MdWRKY120

To analyze the transcriptional activity of MdWRKY120, the complete MdWRKY120 coding sequence was inserted into pGBT9 to obtain the pGBT9-MdWRKY120 construct, which was then transformed in the yeast cells. The empty pGBT9 vector was kept as the negative control. As Figure 4 indicates, the Y2H Gold yeast strain containing pGBT9 only propagated in SD/-Trp, while the yeast strain containing pGBT9-MdWRKY120 propagated in both SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp-His-Ade with X-α-Gal. The result indicated that MdWRKY120 was a transcription activator.

2.5. Overexpression and RNAi Knockdown of MdWRKY120 in ‘GL-3′ Apple

Furthermore, to investigate the extent to which its role is important, especially MdWRKY120’s response to A. alternata in apples, overly expressed ‘GL-3′ apples were developed by transforming with the pRI101-MdWRKY120 plasmid. Putative transgenic plants were acquired via Agrobacterium-mediated ‘GL-3′ apples’ transformation, performed following the instructions of Zhang et al. [21]. Six independent kanamycin-resistant MdWRKY120-overexpressing apple plants were propagated; its overexpression was subsequently determined by PCR analysis using a primer set MdWRKY120F/MdWRKY120R. A 963 bp band from the genomic DNA of 3 overly-expressed MdWRKY120 transgenic lines was amplified. No corresponding bands were observed in ‘GL-3′ plants (Figure 5b). Compared with non-transformed control plants, the MdWRKY120 expressions in the 3 lines were notably enhanced. The relative MdWRKY120 expressions were remarkably enhanced in OE1, and OE1 -4 and -5 (Figure 5c). Thus, the MdWRKY120 was successfully overexpressed in apples with high levels and OE1 and OE5 were selected for further investigation. ‘GL-3′ apples’ MdWRKY120 RNAi silencing was also carried out via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Three independent kanamycin-resistant plants were propagated and authenticated by PCR (Figure 5e) and qRT-PCR (Figure 5f). The MdWRKY120 expression in these propagated plants was sharply decreased, and RNAi-2 and RNAi-5 were chosen to represent MdWRKY120-RNAi transgenic plants.

2.6. MdWRKY120 Confers A. Alternata Resistance to Apple

In A. alternate-infected apples, there was subsequent cell death. The circular black or brownish spots on the leaves expanded in late spring to early summer, eventually causing defoliation. To figure out the role of MdWRKY120 in defending against A. alternata, the leaves 5 days post fungi inoculation were observed and the morbidity and disease index was analyzed. As shown in Figure 6a, after 2 days of fungi inoculation, brown spots appeared in MdWRKY120-RNAi plants and controls, while brown spots were much more obvious in overexpressed plants. After 3 days of inoculation, the overexpressed plants showed more disease spots than MdWRKY120-RNAi plants. In gene-silenced plants, no disease spots appeared until 5 days after inoculation. Moreover, the area of disease spots in MdWRKY120-silenced plants was markedly smaller than that in overexpression and control plants. In brief, after 5 days of inoculation, the morbidity in MdWRKY120-RNAi plants was <45%, compared with >80% morbidity of MdWRKY120 overexpressed plants and 65% of control plants (Figure 6b). The statistics of disease index after 4 days of inoculation in overexpressed plants was lower and, in the gene-silenced plants, was higher than the control. The result indicated that MdWRKY120 enhances apple susceptibility to spotted leaf litter pathogen.

3. Discussion

A. alternata is a fungus that leads to crop diseases, especially in Asian countries such as China. Alternaria infection produces circular black or brownish spots that develop on apple leaves during late spring to early summer and which cause defoliation. The infection leads to reduced photosynthesis, fruit quality, and apple production [3]. Currently, effective treatment methods mainly include chemical use, which can cause cross-resistance [22]. The disease can also arouse the inherent immune response of plants, although little is known about this [23].
The literature suggests the involvement of WRKY proteins in microbe-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity and other important mechanisms. The immune system of plants has two models, including (1) PAMP-triggered immunity, and (2) effector-triggered immunity. Pathogen resistance is a complicated process involving transcriptional regulation, and transcription factors are essential for plant defense responses [24,25,26]. With the recent rapid advancements in molecular biology and transgenic technology, plants’ immunity can be improved by genetic modification. WRKY transcription factors directly or indirectly regulate the expression of downstream stress resistance genes (such as disease resistance-related genes, PR) and improve pathogenic resistance by regulating the immune response in many species [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In a preliminary study, Hawthorns infected by apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (ACLSV) were investigated by high-throughput sequencing, and it was found that plant-pathogen interaction-related genes (WRKY transcription factors) were significantly up-regulated in the infected group [34].
WRKY40 (WRKY family member) is associated with resistance against biotic stress [35,36,37,38,39]. Many complex and overlapping networks, including WRKYs, regulate multiple biological processes in plants. The heterologous expression of GhWRKY40 enhanced the susceptibility of tobacco to R. solanacearum and its reduction in the expression of PR1 and PR2 genes in the SA signal transduction pathway, ACS6 genes in the ET signal transduction pathway, and JAZ1 and JAZ3 genes in the JA signal transduction pathway has been reported [29]. In poplar plants, PtrWRKY40 overexpression enhances its sensitivity to ulcerative pathogens and decreases the expression of genes related to SA signaling pathways PR1.1, PR2.1, PR5.9, and CPR5 [39]. These results suggest that WRKY40 proteins are the transcription factors that are functionally conserved and regulate plants’ abiotic stress response. According to phylogenetic alignment, MdWRKY120 and AtWRKY40 are homologous genes. MdWRKY120 protein had activating transcriptional activity and its overexpression reduced the resistance to A. alternata. Unlike other species, WRKY40 family genes play a negative regulatory role in the immune resistance mechanism against spotted fall disease in apples. An in-depth investigation to evaluate the exact mechanism is needed. This research puts forth crucial information regarding the apple plants’ resistance to Alternaria.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Apple genotype ‘GL-3′ tissues were cultured in the greenhouse of Shenyang Agricultural University, China, and then used in the genetic transformations and fungal inoculation experiments. The tissue for Agrobacterium-mediated leaf transformation was cultured in the subculture MS medium augmented with 0.3 mg/L 6-BA, 0.2 mg/L IAA, and 0.1 mg/L GA3. The experiment was performed after plants grew 5–6 leaves. Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) plants were propagated in a growth chamber at 25 °C under a 14 h day/light cycle. These were subsequently utilized for subcellular localization.
For gene expression analysis, roots, leaves, stems, fruits, and flowers of ‘GL-3′ were harvested, snap freezed in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C.

4.2. Cloning MdWRKY120 Gene

The primer pairs were designed with the sequence of MdWRKY120 (MDP0000794439) and then amplified by utilizing cDNA as a template. ‘GL-3′ leaves’ total RNA was obtained via an improved CTAB protocol [24], followed by cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Then, with this cDNA, the full-length MdWRKY120 coding sequence was amplified. The amplification program was as follows: one cycle of 10 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. The purification of PCR products was carried out with TaKaRa MiniBEST Agarose Gel DNA Extraction Kit Ver.4.0 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), followed by cloning into a pMD18-T Vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and, finally, sequencing.

4.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The WRKY120s amino acid sequences in different species were acquired from the NCBI based on their reported accession number and assessed via the DNAMAN 6.0 software. With the help of MEGA 6.0 software, a phylogenetic tree was generated. (PbWRKY120, XP_009349633.1; MhWRKY120, AGG23550.1; MbWRKY120, TQD95607.1; PmWRKY120, XP_008228795.1; PaWRKY120, XP_021821871.1; RcWRKY120, XP_024182559.1; FvWRKY120, XP_004303242.1; ZjWRKY120, XP_015869638.1; MeWRKY120, XP_021609717.1; AtWRKY120, NP_178199.1; SiWRKY120, XP_011073326.1; CaWRKY120, XP_027121557.1; CsWRKY120, AFJ20666.1; ZmWRKY120, AQK69076.1; OsWRKY120, AAL78375.1.)

4.4. Subcellular Localization

The MdWRKY120 coding sequence (in the absence of stop codon) was attached to the Green Fluorescent Protein gene, and then the fusion gene was cloned in the pRI-GFP vector under the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter regulation. The fusion vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. In the 1-month-old N. benthamiana leaves, A. tumefaciens cells harboring pRI101-GFP and pRI101-MdWRKY120-GFP were administered. The GFP signals were evaluated by a confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica DMi8 A, Wetzlar, Germany) after 2 days.

4.5. Transcriptional Activation Analysis in Yeast Cells

The MdWRKY120 coding region was incorporated in the pGBT9 vector. All the primers that were utilized in this investigation are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The constructs of negative pGBT9-control and pGBT9-MdWRKY120 were transformed into a Y2H Gold yeast strain by following Yeast Protocols Handbook. The transformants were cultured at 28 °C on SD/-Trp for 48 h in an incubator, followed by their 10-, 100-, 1000-, and 10,000-times dilution and transfer onto the SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade plates.

4.6. Vector Construction and Apple ‘GL-3′ Transformation

MdWRKY120 with Sal I and Kpn I restriction sites was incorporated into the pRI101-AN vector and then sequenced at Sangon Biotech (China). The MdWRKY120 gene RNAi vector was constructed as described previously. Briefly, a 311 bp MdWRKY120 specificity fragment was incorporated into the right (Kpn I and Sac I) and left (Xba I and Sal I) pRNAi-E vector’s multiple clone sites. The primer pairs are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The prepared plasmids were then inserted into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 via the freeze-thaw method [40]. Then, the Agrobacterium-mediated method was performed for transforming ‘GL-3′ apples and obtaining transgenic plants [41].

4.7. PCR Confirmation of Transgenic Plants

For further confirmation of the positive transgenic plants, the putative transgenic and ‘GL-3′ plantlets’ total genomic DNA was obtained via a modified CTAB method [42], followed by PCR assessment with MdWRKY120-F/MdWRKY120-R primer set (Table S1). The primer set’s amplicon size was 963 bp and the amplification program was one cycle of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 35 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, 90 s at 72 °C, and a final 10 min extension at 72 °C. Non-transformed plant DNA was set as the negative control.

4.8. Gene Expression Analysis

Gene expression level was evaluated using qRT-PCR and quantified using the 2−ΔΔCT method [43]. Initially, cDNA was prepared via PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), followed by qRT-PCR using SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) [42]. Apple actin gene was taken as a reference. Primers were enlisted in Table S1. The entire experiment was performed three times.

4.9. Alternaria Mali Culture and Infection

The A. alternata fungi were propagated for 7 days on potato dextrose agar at 25 °C. Then, the ‘GL-3′ apple leaves and transgenic apple plants were both inoculated with A. alternata and cultured for 25 days at 23 °C in an incubator. The plants were observed daily and photographed at 0, 1, and 2 days after inoculation. After the specified period, the obtained tissue samples were snap frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Each sample was processed in three biological and technical replicates.
According to the classification standard of apple leaf spots disease:
Incidence   of   a   disease = Number   of   diseased   leaves Investigate   the   total   number   of   leaves × 100 %
Disease   index = Number   of   diseased   leaves   ×   Representative   value   at   all   levels Investigate   the   total   number   of   leaves   ×   highest   level   representative   value × 100 %
The grading standard is shown in Table 1.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was utilized for the statistical assessment of the data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out by Duncan’s multiple-range test. p < 0.05 was deemed a significant difference.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study finds that MdWRKY120 overexpression transgenic plants were more sensitive to A. alternata, while RNAi transgenic plants showed increased resistance to A. alternata. This research puts forth crucial information regarding the apple plants’ resistance to Alternaria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11233389/s1. Table S1: Primers used for vector construction and qRT-PCR of MdWRKY120; Table S2: Prediction of putative cis-regulatory elements of MdWRKY120 promoter.

Author Contributions

H.D. and Y.M. planned and organized the study. H.D. provided the plant material. W.C. and Y.L. established the fungal cultures and performed the infections. L.L., W.G. and J.S. performed the transformation. W.G. performed the RNA isolation and quality assessment. L.L. and W.G. performed the qRT-PCR measurements. L.L. and X.L. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972380), the Key Project of the Department of Science & Technology of Liaoning Provence (2020-MS-349) and the project of the education department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0647).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972380), the Key Project of the Department of Science & Technology of Liaoning Provence (2020-MS-349) and the project of the education department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0647). And extending the Acknowledgements to Shenyang Agricultural University and School of Horticulture Liaoning Vocational College of Ecological Engineering for providing the necessary support to conduct this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, S.; Peduto Hand, F. Determining the sources of primary and secondary inoculum and seasonal inoculum dynamics of fungal pathogens causing fruit rot of deciduous holly. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Miyamoto, Y.; Ishii, Y.; Honda, A.; Masunaka, A.; Tsuge, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Ohtani, K.; Fukumoto, T.; Gomi, K.; Peever, T.L.; et al. Function of genes encoding Acyl-CoA synthetase and Enoyl-CoA hydratase for host-selective act-toxin biosynthesis in the tangerine pathotype of Alternaria alternata. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moriya, S.; Terakami, S.; Okada, K.; Shimizu, T.; Adachi, Y.; Katayose, Y.; Fujisawa, H.; Wu, J.; Kanamori, H.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Identification of candidate genes responsible for the susceptibility of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) to Alternaria blotch. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dong, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z. Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 51, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ulker, B.; Somssich, I.E. WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meng, D.; Li, Y.; Bai, Y.; Li, M.; Cheng, L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of WRKY transcriptional factor family in apple and analysis of their responses to waterlogging and drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, K.F.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.F.; Wu, L.J.; Xie, D.X. Molecular phylogenetic and expression analysis of the complete WRKY transcription factor family in maize. DNA Res. 2012, 19, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ross, C.A.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.J. The WRKY gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiong, C.; Zhao, S.; Yu, X.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Ruan, C.; Li, J. Yellowhorn drought-induced transcription factor XsWRKY20 acts as a positive regulator in drought stress through ROS homeostasis and ABA signaling pathway. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY8 functions antagonistically with its interacting partner VQ9 to modulate salinity stress tolerance. Plant J. 2013, 74, 730–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, D.; Jiang, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. The WRKY53 transcription factor enhances stilbene synthesis and disease resistance by interacting with MYB14 and MYB15 in Chinese wild grape. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 3211–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, C.; Lin, Q.; Lan, J.; Zhang, T.; Liu, X.; Miao, R.; Mou, C.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. WRKY transcription factor OsWRKY29 represses seed dormancy in rice by weakening abscisic acid response. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, R.; Liu, D.; Huang, M.; Ma, J.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; Sui, S. CpWRKY71, a WRKY transcription factor gene of wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox), promotes flowering and leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Z.; Shi, L.; Weng, Y.; Zou, H.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Qiu, S.; Huang, X.; Huang, J.; Hussain, A.; et al. ChiIV3 Acts as a novel target of WRKY40 to mediate pepper immunity against Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chakraborty, J.; Ghosh, P.; Sen, S.; Das, S. Epigenetic and transcriptional control of chickpea WRKY40 promoter activity under Fusarium stress and its heterologous expression in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced resistance against bacterial pathogen. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schön, M.; Töller, A.; Diezel, C.; Roth, C.; Westphal, L.; Wiermer, M.; Somssich, I.E. Analyses of wrky18 wrky40 plants reveal critical roles of SA/EDS1 signaling and indole-glucosinolate biosynthesis for Golovinomyces orontii resistance and a loss-of resistance towards Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato AvrRPS4. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Yan, Y.; Li, Y.; Chu, X.; Wu, C.; Guo, X. GhWRKY40, a multiple stress-responsive cotton WRKY gene, plays an important role in the wounding response and enhances susceptibility to Ralstonia solanacearum infection in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.T.; Ru, J.N.; Liu, Y.W.; Li, M.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.F.; Fu, J.D.; Xu, Z.S. Maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY106 confers drought and heat tolerance in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3046–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, S.; Hao, L.; Wang, S.; Li, T. Md-miR156ab and Md-miR395 target WRKY transcription factors to influence apple resistance to leaf spot disease. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 3389–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, L.N.; He, M.H.; Ouyang, H.B.; Zhu, W.; Pan, Z.C.; Sui, Q.J.; Shang, L.P.; Zhan, J. Cross-resistance of the pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata to fungicides with different modes of action. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shi, J.; Zhang, F.; Su, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Nie, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; et al. MdIPT8, an isopentenyl transferase enzyme, enhances the resistance of apple to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 303, 111245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chisholm, S.T.; Coaker, G.; Day, B.; Staskawicz, B.J. Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nejat, N.; Mantri, N. Plant immune system: Crosstalk between responses to biotic and abiotic stresses the missing link in understanding plant defence. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2017, 23, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Muthamilarasan, M.; Prasad, M. Plant innate immunity: An updated insight into defense mechanism. J. Biosci. 2013, 38, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dang, F.; Lin, J.; Xue, B.; Chen, Y.; Guan, D.; Wang, Y.; He, S. CaWRKY27 negatively regulates H2O2-mediated thermotolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, C.; He, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Guo, X. The cotton MAPK kinase GhMPK20 negatively regulates resistance to Fusarium oxysporum by mediating the MKK4-MPK20-WRKY40 cascade. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1624–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lin, L.; Cui, M.; Long, Y.; Xing, Z. Genome-wide identification of WRKY transcription factors in the Asteranae. Plants 2019, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, T.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genomics. 2018, 19, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sahebi, M.; Hanafi, M.M.; Rafii, M.Y.; Mahmud, T.M.M.; Azizi, P.; Osman, M.; Abiri, R.; Taheri, S.; Kalhori, N.; Shabanimofrad, M.; et al. Improvement of drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Genetics, genomic tools, and the WRKY gene family. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 3158474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, W.Y.; Du, Y.T.; Ma, J.; Min, D.H.; Jin, L.G.; Chen, J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.B.; Ma, Y.Z.; Xu, Z.S.; et al. The WRKY transcription factor GmWRKY12 confers drought and salt tolerance in soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, W.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, N.; Liu, L.; Ma, Y.; Dai, H. The hawthorn CpLRR-RLK1 gene targeted by ACLSV-derived vsiRNA positively regulate resistance to bacteria disease. Plant Sci. 2020, 300, 110641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gu, L.; Li, L.; Wei, H.; Wang, H.; Su, J.; Guo, Y.; Yu, S. Identification of the group IIa WRKY subfamily and the functional analysis of GhWRKY17 in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abeysinghe, J.K.; Lam, K.M.; Ng, D.W. Differential regulation and interaction of homoeologous WRKY18 and WRKY40 in Arabidopsis allotetraploids and biotic stress responses. Plant J. 2019, 97, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, X.; Chen, C.; Fan, B.; Chen, Z. Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1310–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pandey, S.P.; Roccaro, M.; Schön, M.; Logemann, E.; Somssich, I.E. Transcriptional reprogramming regulated by WRKY18 and WRKY40 facilitates powdery mildew infection of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 64, 912–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karim, A.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, L.; Ling, Z.; Ye, S.; Duan, Y.; Li, C.; Luo, K. Isolation and characterization of a subgroup IIa WRKY transcription factor PtrWRKY40 from Populus trichocarpa. Tree Physiol. 2015, 35, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, Y.; Xue, H.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, S.; Yue, P.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; He, P.; et al. The miR156/SPL module regulates apple slat stress tolerance by activing MdWRKY100 expression. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, H.; Li, W.; Han, G.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z. Development of a seedling clone with high regeneration capacity and susceptibility to Agrobacterium in apple. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 164, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, K.; Guo, Y.; Song, M.; Liu, L.; Xue, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Z. Dual Role of MdSND1 in the Biosynthesis of Lignin and in Signal Transduction in Response to Salt and Osmotic Stress in Apple. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, K.; Tang, X.; Song, M.; Guo, Y.; Liu, L.; Xue, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, K.; Tang, X.; et al. Functional Identification of MdMYB5 Involved in Secondary Cell Wall Formation in Apple. Fruit Res. 2021, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic alignment of MdWRKY120 homologous proteins. (a) The Phylogenetic tree of MdWRKY120. The red dot represents apple WRKY120. Pb, Pyrus bretschneideri; Md, Malus domestica; Mh, Malus hupehensis; Mb, Malus baccata; Pm, Prunus mume; Pa, Prunus armeniaca; Rc, Ricinus communis; Fv, Fragaria vesca; Zj, Ziziphus jujube; Me, Manihot esculenta; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Si, Setaria italica; Ca, Coffea arabica; Cs, Camellia sinensis; Zm, Zea mays; Os, Oryza sativa. (b) Sequence alignment of MdWRKY120 amino acids.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic alignment of MdWRKY120 homologous proteins. (a) The Phylogenetic tree of MdWRKY120. The red dot represents apple WRKY120. Pb, Pyrus bretschneideri; Md, Malus domestica; Mh, Malus hupehensis; Mb, Malus baccata; Pm, Prunus mume; Pa, Prunus armeniaca; Rc, Ricinus communis; Fv, Fragaria vesca; Zj, Ziziphus jujube; Me, Manihot esculenta; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Si, Setaria italica; Ca, Coffea arabica; Cs, Camellia sinensis; Zm, Zea mays; Os, Oryza sativa. (b) Sequence alignment of MdWRKY120 amino acids.
Plants 11 03389 g001
Figure 2. Expression patterns of MdWRKY120 in various tissues as assessed by qRT-PCR. The error bars represent data from 3 experimental replicates.
Figure 2. Expression patterns of MdWRKY120 in various tissues as assessed by qRT-PCR. The error bars represent data from 3 experimental replicates.
Plants 11 03389 g002
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of MdWRKY120. The MdWRKY120-GFP (bottom) and GFP (top) vectors were transformed in tobacco protoplasts, respectively.
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of MdWRKY120. The MdWRKY120-GFP (bottom) and GFP (top) vectors were transformed in tobacco protoplasts, respectively.
Plants 11 03389 g003
Figure 4. Transcriptional Activity Analysis of MdWRKY120. The empty BD (pGBT9) or yeast strains transformed BD-MdWRKY120 constructs propagated in SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade and SD/-Trp media, respectively.
Figure 4. Transcriptional Activity Analysis of MdWRKY120. The empty BD (pGBT9) or yeast strains transformed BD-MdWRKY120 constructs propagated in SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade and SD/-Trp media, respectively.
Plants 11 03389 g004
Figure 5. Molecular confirmation of MdWRKY120-overexpressing transgenic lines. (a) Structural diagram of the pRI101-MdWRKY120 construct with increased expression of MdWRKY120, driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. (b) PCR evaluation of T-DNA sequences from ‘GL-3′ plants and MdWRKY120 transgenic lines. (c) qPCR assessment of ‘GL-3′ plants and independent positive transgenic lines’ MdWRKY120 transcripts. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05. (d) Structural diagram of the pRNAi-MdWRKY120 construct. (e) PCR evaluation of T-DNA sequences from ‘GL-3′ plants and MdWRKY120 transgenic lines. (f) qPCR assessment of ‘GL-3′ plants and independent positive transgenic lines’ MdWRKY120 transcripts. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Molecular confirmation of MdWRKY120-overexpressing transgenic lines. (a) Structural diagram of the pRI101-MdWRKY120 construct with increased expression of MdWRKY120, driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. (b) PCR evaluation of T-DNA sequences from ‘GL-3′ plants and MdWRKY120 transgenic lines. (c) qPCR assessment of ‘GL-3′ plants and independent positive transgenic lines’ MdWRKY120 transcripts. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05. (d) Structural diagram of the pRNAi-MdWRKY120 construct. (e) PCR evaluation of T-DNA sequences from ‘GL-3′ plants and MdWRKY120 transgenic lines. (f) qPCR assessment of ‘GL-3′ plants and independent positive transgenic lines’ MdWRKY120 transcripts. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05.
Plants 11 03389 g005
Figure 6. MdWRKY120 overexpression increases the sensitivity to Alternaria blotch in apples. (a) Disease reaction phenotypes from ‘GL-3′ and transgenic apple leaves, bars = 1 cm. (b) The disease incidence of apple transgenic plants and controls under A. alternate stress. (c) The disease index of apple transgenic plants and controls under A. alternate stress. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05.
Figure 6. MdWRKY120 overexpression increases the sensitivity to Alternaria blotch in apples. (a) Disease reaction phenotypes from ‘GL-3′ and transgenic apple leaves, bars = 1 cm. (b) The disease incidence of apple transgenic plants and controls under A. alternate stress. (c) The disease index of apple transgenic plants and controls under A. alternate stress. Vertical bars depict the SDs (n = 3). ‘*’ demonstrate p < 0.05.
Plants 11 03389 g006
Table 1. Grading standard of disease.
Table 1. Grading standard of disease.
(X) Value
of Grade
Percentage of the Disease Spots in Total LeavesSeverity
0X = 0No disease spot
10 < X ≤ 10The disease spot area < 1/10
310 < X ≤ 251/10 < The disease spot area < 1/4
525 < X ≤ 501/4 < The disease spot area < 2/5
750 < X ≤ 752/5 < The disease spot area < 3/4
9X > 75.0The disease spot area > 3/4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Shi, J.; Chen, W.; Lei, Y.; Ma, Y.; Dai, H. MdWRKY120 Enhance Apple Susceptibility to Alternaria alternata. Plants 2022, 11, 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233389

AMA Style

Liu L, Li X, Guo W, Shi J, Chen W, Lei Y, Ma Y, Dai H. MdWRKY120 Enhance Apple Susceptibility to Alternaria alternata. Plants. 2022; 11(23):3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233389

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Lifu, Xiaoming Li, Wei Guo, Jiajun Shi, Wenjun Chen, Yingying Lei, Yue Ma, and Hongyan Dai. 2022. "MdWRKY120 Enhance Apple Susceptibility to Alternaria alternata" Plants 11, no. 23: 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233389

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop