Next Article in Journal
Allelopathy of Lantana camara as an Invasive Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Change, Crop Yields, and Grain Quality of C3 Cereals: A Meta-Analysis of [CO2], Temperature, and Drought Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Foliar Endophytic Fungi from the Endangered Eastern Mountain Avens (Geum peckii, Rosaceae) in Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Tuber Developmental Processes in Response of Potato to High Temperature and Elevated CO2
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Elevated CO2 and Heat on Wheat Grain Quality

by and *
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630 Tåstrup, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(5), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10051027
Received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Adaptation to Elevated CO2 and Temperature)

Abstract

:
Wheat is one of the most important staple foods in temperate regions and is in increasing demand in urbanizing and industrializing countries such as China. Enhancing yield potential to meet the population explosion around the world and maintaining grain quality in wheat plants under climate change are crucial for food security and human nutrition. Global warming resulting from greenhouse effect has led to more frequent occurrence of extreme climatic events. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) along with rising temperature has a huge impact on ecosystems, agriculture and human health. There are numerous studies investigating the eCO2 and heatwaves effects on wheat growth and productivity, and the mechanisms behind. This review outlines the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the effects of eCO2 and heat stress, individually and combined, on grain yield and grain quality in wheat crop. Strategies to enhance the resilience of wheat to future warmer and CO2-enriched environment are discussed.

1. Introduction

Global atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) is expected to reach levels of 420 ppm (RCP2.6) to 1300 ppm (RCP8.5) by the end of this century (IPCC, 2013) with a concomitant rise in mean global temperature of about 2 °C by 2050 (IPCC, 2014). Extreme climatic events (ECEs), such as heat waves and droughts, which often affect plant growth and pose a growing threat to natural and agricultural ecosystems, are predicted to increase in frequency and severity in many cropping areas [1,2]. Wheat is one of the world’s major food crops with an average annual global production of over 750 million tons from 2015 to 2019 (http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 14 May 2021)). It is considered an important source of starch and energy. Wheat provides significant amounts of important nutrients, including proteins and mineral elements, as well as other components that are beneficial to human health, such as vitamins (especially vitamin B), phytochemicals and dietary fibers [3]. The effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) on wheat grain yield and grain quality has been well studied [4,5,6]. A general increase in grain yield and a reduction of grain quality of plants grown under eCO2, especially the decrease of nitrogen (N) concentration and thus also protein contents, have often been reported, leading to the conclusion that eCO2 potentially exacerbates the prevalence of “hidden hunger” for human nutrition [7,8].
Another environmental factor, heat waves, limits wheat yields globally [9]. Air temperatures have increased since the beginning of the century and global temperature is predicted to increase 1.5–5.5 °C in the next 50 to 75 years [10]. Such increases in the temperature can lead to heat stress, a severe threat to wheat production, particularly when it occurs during reproductive and grain-filling phases [11]. Previous studies showed that exposure to temperatures above the optimum temperature for wheat at anthesis and grain filling stage (12 to 20 °C) can significantly reduce grain yield of more than 20% [12,13]. All the physiological processes of wheat plants are sensitive to temperature and can be damaged by heat permanently. Heat stress during anthesis can increase floret abortion [14] and temperatures over 30 °C during floret formation may lead to complete sterility [15]. Heat stress during reproductive stage can lead to pollen sterility, tissue dehydration, lower CO2 assimilation, increased photorespiration and reduced time to capture resources due to accelerated growth and senescence, consequently reducing the yield [11,16]. Besides the effects on grain yield, heat stress also has great impact on wheat grain quality. It was reported that heat stress could alter the ratio of gliadin to glutenin, which may lead to weaker dough properties and reduce baking quality [17]. However, there was a great diversity of the dough weakening effect under heat stress in other studies [18,19] because wheat quality mainly depends on genotype (G), environment (E) and their interactive effects (G × E) [20]. Several studies carried out at the CIMMYT showed diverse responses of different cultivars in quality traits under drought and heat stressed conditions. Hernandez-Espinosa et al. [21] reported that grain morphology (grain density and size), protein content and flour yield were strongly affected by the environment, while the traits related to gluten quality (gluten strength and extensibility, and bread loaf volume) were mainly determined by genotype, but the environmental and G × E effects were also important, especially for gluten extensibility. Li et al. [22] tested 15 quality parameters and found similar results that environmental factors have large effect on grain yield, while grain hardness and gluten quality-related traits are mainly controlled by genotype. Moreover, they found that drought and heat stress showed contrasting effects on dough rheological properties, where heat stress decreased dough tenacity (increased extensibility), slightly reduced dough strength and increased bread loaf volume while drought stress is the opposite. These results suggest that wheat quality is determined by many inter-related factors.
Although the impact of rising CO2 concentration and elevated temperature on plant growth and development has been well studied, the combined effects of heat stress with eCO2 on wheat crop performance remain unclear. Stomatal closure is induced by eCO2, which leads to the reduction of transpirational canopy cooling; however, higher temperature results in higher water vapor deficits in the air, causing an increased transpiration rate thereby offsetting the effect of stomatal closure induced by eCO2 on crop water relations [23]. On the other hand, reduced stomatal conductance under eCO2 will slow transpiration rate thereby alleviating the impact of water stress, which is often concurrent with heat stress [24]. However, plants’ ability to sustain leaf gas exchange is dependent on genotype and stress intensity [25]. More detailed studies are required to assess the balance of these processes and how they acclimate to different environmental factors, because under eCO2 growth environment plants’ response to these abiotic stresses can be much more complicated. Therefore, this review summarizes current knowledge regarding the effects of eCO2 and heat stress on grain yield and quality in wheat and aims to (i) introduce wheat quality traits that are sensitive to abiotic growth conditions, (ii) discuss the impacts of eCO2 and heat stress on wheat grain yield and quality and the underlying mechanisms.

2. Wheat Quality and Grain Protein

Wheat is the most important staple food in the world due to its wide adaptation to diverse growth conditions and its unique property of gluten protein fraction in the grain. Wheat has evolved itself from emmer wheat into the cultivated species today by both nature and anthropogenic processes since primitive times (ca. 3000–4000 BC). There are two major wheat species nowadays utilized for food production. The first one is common bread wheat (Triticum aestevum L.), a hexaploid wheat that is mainly processed into baking products and the other one is tetraploid durum wheat (T. turgidum L. var. durum), which is used to make coarse flour (semolina) for pasta making. Wheat species can be classified by grain hardness, color (red, white and amber) and growing season (spring or winter wheat) and within each class, wheat grain can be evaluated by different grading factors [26]. Wheat grain quality is a combination of many specific parameters. The processing and end-use quality is determined by the multiple phenotypic characteristics of grain, flour, dough and final products [27]. Grain protein content (GPC) is considered as one of the most important components affecting the baking quality [28]. Besides, concentration of mineral nutrients, grain hardness (milling properties), grain size, starch content and minor grain constituents such as lipids and soluble proteins also play important roles in determining end-use properties [10,29].
Baking quality mainly depends on the protein composition and concentrations of wheat grains. Wheat grain proteins are divided into three categories according to their solubility in different solvents: (1) water-soluble non-prolamins, albumins and globulins (ALGL), which play important roles in grain metabolism, development and response to environmental factors [30]; (2) gliadins (GLIA), which are soluble in 70% ethanol at room temperature and (3) glutenins (GLUT), which are soluble in dissolving media [31,32]. Gliadins and glutenins are storage proteins, which decide the baking quality, and they are collectively called gluten proteins. Gliadins are mixtures of single polypeptides and are classified into four subgroups: α-, β-, γ- and ω-GLIA, which can be separated by gel electrophoresis at low pH and by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) [33], whereas glutenins comprise the subunits that are aggregated together by disulphide bonds which are high (HMW-GS) and low molecular weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS). Gliadins and glutenins are responsible for different biophysical properties where gliadins decide the dough viscosity while glutenins determine the dough elasticity and strength [32,34].
The concentrations and composition of gluten proteins are dependent on both the genotypic (variety) and the environmental factors (climate, fertilization, soil, etc.) [35], especially the availability of N fertilization [3,36]. Wieser and Seilmeier [31] reported that different N fertilization strongly influenced the quantities of gluten proteins where the effect on gliadins was more pronounced than that on glutenins, whereas albumins and globulins were barely affected. Moreover, the proportions of gluten proteins were changed significantly, where the hydrophilic proteins (ω-GLIA, HMW-GS) were increased by higher N supply and hydrophobic proteins (γ-GLIA, LMW-GS) were decreased. Daniel and Triboi [33] showed similar results that the percentage of proteins and gliadins in the flour increased with the increase of N supply and the proportion of ω-GLIA in total gliadin increased with N while the α- and β-GLIA decreased with N fertilization. In durum wheat, heat and/or drought stress during cultivation affect the grain quality attributes. According to Li et al. [37], drought tends to enhance gluten strength through increased lactic acid retention capacity (LARC) and mixograph peak time (MPT), while heat stress tends to decrease these parameters. Guzmán et al. [38] reported that the concentration of micronutrients (Fe and Zn) and flour yellowness (processing and pasta-making quality) in durum wheat were improved by drought but reduced by heat stress except Zn content, which increased under severe heat stress due to “concentration effect” induced by smaller grain. Moreover, heat stress was found to reduce gluten strength (alveograph energy, W) leading to a weakening effect on grain quality in durum wheat. However, in bread wheat, Hernandez-Espinosa et al. [21] did not detect the absolute weakening dough effect under severe heat stressed condition; both drought and heat stress led to higher gluten strength due to the higher protein content level. Joshi et al. [39] found that Fe and Zn concentrations in wheat grains varied across locations and years and are influenced by higher temperature and soil availability of Zn content in 30–60 cm soil depth. However, the effects of growing conditions are only based on quantitative effects, the influences on the structures, quantities and proportions of flour protein groups and the gluten protein types are largely dependent on the variety [31].

3. The Effects of eCO2 on Wheat Plants and the Mechanisms Behind

Elevated CO2 enhances plant growth (productivity and total biomass) through promoting net CO2 assimilation rate (A) and improving water use efficiency (WUE) due to reduced stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration in C3 plants (e.g., rice and wheat) and therefore leading to a higher yield [40,41]. Wheat grain yield is mainly derived from photosynthates of leaf, stem and ear during the grain filling stage. The translocation of storage of carbohydrates in stem only contributes 5–10% to final grain weight [42], while flag provides major source of photoassimilate to grain during the period of grain development [43].
According to Wang et al. [4], a meta-analysis of the effects of eCO2 on wheat physiology and yield showed that eCO2 (450–800 ppm) significantly increased A by 33% and decreased gs by 23%, Rubisco total activity by 26% and Rubisco content by 14%, hence increasing grain yield by 24%. However, the yield increase in free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments was 44% less than those obtained in non-FACE (i.e., enclosure) facilities. While Broberg et al. [41] reported that wheat grain yield increased by 26% under eCO2 (605 ppm) on an average, mainly through the increase in grain number. Similar results were found in rice where eCO2 (627 ppm), on an average, increased rice yields by 23% through increasing grain mass, panicle and grain number, while FACE experiments showed only a 12% increase in rice yield [44]. In addition, Wang et al. [45] reported that eCO2 enhanced rice yield by 20% on average, however, the yield responses to eCO2 were smaller under FACE conditions (+16%) compared with other methods including greenhouses (+37%), growth chambers (+24%), and open-top chambers (+20%).
Moreover, the type of cultivars also plays an important role in determining the physiological and yield responses of crops to eCO2. Lv et al. [46] reported that eCO2 enhanced rice yields by 13.5%, 22.6% and 32.8% for japonica, indica and hybrid cultivars, respectively, in FACE experiments. In wheat, eCO2 had significantly different effects on A between the two types of wheat cultivars (i.e., spring and winter wheat) with a higher increase (71%) in spring wheat cultivars and only 23% increase in winter wheat cultivars [47]. In addition to grain crops, eCO2 was also reported to increase the yield of vegetables, ornamentals, non-agricultural herbaceous species and woody species by 33% on average with a doubling atmospheric CO2 concentration [48]. According to a meta-analysis conducted by Dong et al. [49], eCO2 (827 ppm) generally enhanced yield of vegetables by 34% mainly through the increasing number of organs and vegetable mass. However, other environmental factors could modulate the eCO2 effects on yield responses including temperature, light, water availability and nutrient supply. For example, the eCO2 yield stimulation in wheat plants was stronger in the regions with low agronomic productivity [41] and the enhancement in A of wheat and rice plants was greater under sufficient nutrient compared to that under lower nutrient supply [4,44]. Therefore, optimizing growth environments are required to maximize the eCO2-induced yield benefit in agricultural systems, such as additional light (PAR) and high N availability [50,51].
Although eCO2 can enhance the productivity and yield of agricultural crops, it on the other hand alters and decreases the plant quality, depressing the concentrations of macronutrients (i.e., carbohydrates, protein, and fat) and micronutrients (i.e., minerals, vitamins and phytonutrients) [7,8,52]. Dong et al. [53] reported that eCO2 increased the concentrations of fructose, glucose and total soluble sugar in the edible part of vegetables but decreased the concentrations of protein, N, magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) by 9.5%, 18.0%, 9.2%, 16.0% and 9.4%, respectively. A meta-analysis conducted by Taub et al. [54] on several major food crops showed that eCO2 (540–958 ppm) reduced cereal grain protein concentrations by 10–15% on an average in wheat, barley and rice and reduced tuber protein concentration in potato by 14%. Moreover, for soybean, there was a smaller but statistically significant decrease of protein concentration of 1.4% compared with that grown under ambient CO2 concentration (aCO2). In rice, the nutritive value of grains was also negatively affected by eCO2 under FACE conditions through a decrease in protein by 6% and copper (Cu) content by 20% [55].
It is well known that eCO2 has direct effect on C and N metabolism in wheat, resulting in changes in the chemical composition in plants [8,56]. In a FACE experiment, Högy et al. [5] reported that eCO2 leads to an overall reduction in grain protein concentration by 7.4% in spring wheat cultivars, particularly the N- and glutamine-rich gliadin fraction, thus lowering the gluten concentration and reducing baking quality. Along with the lowered protein concentration in grain, the composition of amino acids and their concentrations were also modified under eCO2, and the size distribution was significantly shifted towards smaller grains [5]. Blandino et al. [57] also suggested a 7% decrease of protein content in four winter wheat cultivars, accompanied by a reduction in dough strength of plants grown under FACE conditions. A three-year field trial in Australia demonstrated that eCO2 consistently decreased baking quality and grain protein content in wheat, and protein composition changed towards a greater glutenin/gliadin ratio in all years [58]. Moreover, eCO2 could also reduce concentration of minerals in wheat grain. For instance, a significant decrease in concentrations of Zn and Fe in wheat grain has been reported [6]. Similar reduction in grain S [59], Ca, Fe and Zn [60] concentrations was documented for wheat grown under eCO2.
There are many different hypotheses explaining these changes of grain quality traits (summarized in Figure 1) and the most frequently mentioned one is the dilution effect, which includes two aspects, biomass dilution and functional dilution [61]. Biomass dilution mainly results from the accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) (i.e., soluble sugars, starch, fructans, etc.) which are initial long-term C-storage products of enhanced photosynthesis induced by eCO2 and therefore reduces the concentration of other constituents [62]. It means that proteins and minerals are diluted by the increased photosynthetic assimilation of carbon, which poses a great threat to future food security because the calories in the food may be sufficient but undernourishment with essential mineral nutrients. For example, eCO2 greatly increased the ratio of C to N by increasing the starch and total NSC concentrations and decreasing grain N concentration in wheat [63]. However, Taub et al. [54] found that the magnitude of the negative eCO2 effect on wheat grains was smaller under high soil N conditions than under low soil N with the decrease of grain protein concentrations by 9.8% and 16.4%, respectively, suggesting that the dilution effect may be compensated by a higher nutrient supply. Besides, a relative increase in the synthesis of C-based secondary compounds that are low in N (e.g., lignins, tannins or other polyphenolics) may lead to dilution as well [64], but there was no consistent response [65,66,67].
Functional dilution refers to a decrease in dry mass concentration of N (Nm) due to increased shoot specific activity, which means that N concentration declines due to the accumulation of additional photosynthates by shoots [61]. This theory bases on the functional-balance model:
Nm     root   mass   ×   rate   ( absorption ) leaf   mass   ×   rate   ( photosynthesis ) ,
where the tissue N concentrations are dependent on the relative activities of roots and shoots and the partitioning of photosynthates is controlled by the relative rates of root absorption of soil nutrients and leaf photosynthesis [68,69]. Functional dilution seems to be pervasive because increased photosynthetic rates for plants grown under eCO2 is frequently observed if we assume the shoot specific activity equal to photosynthetic rate [70].
Within either biomass dilution or functional dilution, all other mineral elements except C, H and O that are assimilated through photosynthesis should be diluted to a similar ratio. However, there are many heterogeneous responses of different mineral concentrations for crops under eCO2. For instance, the decrease in Zn concentrations in rice grains under eCO2 was significantly different from those in Cu, Ca, B and P [6] indicating that dilution is not the only mechanism responsible for decreasing nutrient concentrations in plants under eCO2 [54,61,71]. Li et al. [72] reported that both the concentrations of K, Ca and Mg in wheat organs and the total accumulations of these elements in the plants were significantly decreased by eCO2. Moreover, they also found decreases of the concentration of these minerals in the xylem sap, suggesting that the reduced mineral concentrations were not only because of dilution effect but also due to a reduced nutrient acquisition by roots. Within the functional balance concept mentioned above, decreased specific root activity could also play a role in the reduction of nutrient concentrations in plants through a decreased root uptake rate under eCO2, but the effect is larger for plants grown in soil than in hydroponics [73]. It is reported that the average mean decrease of specific root uptake rate of N (i.e., uptake per unit root mass or length) for plants grown in solid media is 16.4% [74,75,76]. While the results for root uptake kinetics in solution were quite different and variable [69], but the overall trend was to increase rather than decrease the specific N uptake [77,78]. Therefore, there are some elements influencing the root uptake that are not present in hydroponics. This indicates that the soil microbiomes, rhizosphere conditions and/or root architecture may play a role in nutrient uptake as well.
When it comes to the acquisition of nutrients, there are two aspects: uptake and demand by the plants. On the one hand, eCO2 could affect the ability of soil-root system to supply N, which refers to source effect. On the other hand, eCO2 could also increase source use efficiencies, which allows plants to sustain growth in a lower N concentration leading to a lower demand of nutrients (demand effect) [61]. Besides the root specific activity mentioned above, it is widely recognized that the eCO2-induced decrease in plant mineral uptake associated with the reduced mass flow or diffusion of mineral ions from the soil solution to the root surface due to lower transpiration rate which results from a reduced stomatal conductance under eCO2. There is evidence that eCO2 enhances the root growth, which may enable the plants to acquire more nutrients; while a number of studies have also indicated that eCO2 depresses root hydraulic conductance [79] probably via down-regulating genes encoding aquaporin hereby reducing the mass flow. In addition, it has been proposed that the effect of transpiration rate on mineral uptake is more pronounced with those primarily transported via mass flow (e.g., N, Ca and Mg) than those via diffusion (e.g., P, K and most micronutrients) [80]. This may lead to a shift in the stoichiometry, further affecting nutritive value of the grain [7]. However, to date these possible effects of eCO2 on root water and mineral uptake have not been fully illustrated.

4. The Effects of Heat Stress on Wheat Grain Quality

Wheat is a temperate crop adapted to temperatures below 30 °C and the threshold temperature during post-anthesis stage is 26 °C [18]. Heat stress (over 35 °C) has a huge impact on both grain yield and grain quality during anthesis and grain-filling phase; however, most of the studies focused on the heat stress effects on grain yield components [18,81,82], only a few studies investigated the impact of heat stress on grain quality traits [17,18,35,83,84]. Increased temperature affects grain development due to the limitation of assimilate supply, grain-filling duration and rate, and starch biosynthesis and deposition [11]. The effects of heat stress on wheat grain quality are summarized in Table 1. The response of wheat to heat stress varied between genotypes and the degree of heat-caused damage depends on the intensity, duration and frequency of heat stress [83,85].
Although extremely high temperatures have more detrimental impact on grain quality, within moderate or chronic temperature range (15–35 °C), there are also marked changes in grain quality. For example, dough strength (measured by resistance to extension of a dough piece in the Babender Extensograph) was increased with rise in daily average temperature up to about 30 °C; however, when the temperature was above this threshold value to max. 36 °C, even applied for only 3 days, it tended to decrease dough strength. This occurred independent of the timing of the stress, but the degree of reduction varied with different growth stages [89]. In addition, the protein content per grain increases without a change for starch when the temperature rises between 15 and 21 °C during grain-filling stage; however, when temperature reaches 30 °C, the deposition of both protein and starch reduces but with more pronounced decrease in starch than protein [86]. These discrepancies indicate that different growth stages have different threshold and sensitivity to high temperatures. However, the overall higher temperatures generally reduce wheat grain yield through producing smaller grains, reducing grain number and lowering kernel weight [15,90,91], and alter grain quality by increasing GPC but decreasing starch deposition and functional properties of wheat flour [18,35,87], although different wheat genotypes respond differently under heat stress [84,92,93]. For example, Castro et al. [84] evaluated 14 spring wheat genotypes to characterize their response to high temperatures and detected a significant genotype × treatment interaction, suggesting that varieties possess a thermos tolerant response could be used as genetic sources for breeding heat tolerance wheat cultivars.
GPC is the most important characteristic determining wheat grain quality and is in essence determined by the relative rates and durations of protein and starch synthesis [88]. Starch accounting for 65–75% of wheat grain dry weight and over 80% of endosperm weight, which is a decisive factor of grain yield and flour quality [94]. During grain development, starch is deposited into three types of granules differing in size and their formative period in amyloplasts. Large lenticular A-type granules with diameters greater than 15.9 µm are synthesized early during endosperm development; spherical B-type granules with diameters between 5.3 µm and 15.9 µm are produced during mid-development and smaller C-type granules with diameters less than 5.3 µm are initiated late in development [95]. It is reported that high temperatures applied post anthesis reduced the duration of starch accumulation and starch content and modified the size distribution of starch granules with less B-type granules produced in the grain under higher temperatures [88,96]. For the functional properties, starch is composed of two classes of glucose polymers: straight-chained amylose, which is an almost linear α-1,4 glucan molecule comprising 25–30% of grain starch, and highly branched amylopectin, which constitutes 70–75% grain starch [97,98]. Under heat stress during grain-filling stage, the amylose to amylopectin ratio increases, leading to a reduction in dough elasticity [99]. Extension of α-1,4 glucan chains is catalyzed by starch synthases, which are sensitive to heat stress [100], indicating that high temperatures decrease metabolism and enzyme activities involved in starch biosynthesis and reducing the rate of conversion of sucrose to starch [101]. The decreasing starch deposition affects protein concentration by allowing more N per unit of starch [91], leading to smaller grain size, which as a result causing a decrease in milling quality [83].
Under heat stress, the reduction of dough properties of wheat is mainly associated with the reduction of glutenins in gluten proteins especially the HMW-GS [102] that accounts for the genotypic variance in wheat quality [35]. Although there is a general increase in grain protein proportion relative to starch content under high temperatures, due to less temperature sensitivity of N accumulation than starch deposition [88], the protein composition alters towards a poorer flour quality by the following reasons summarized by Blumenthal et al. [102]. First, heat stress decreases synthesis of glutenins therefore leading to the reduction in glutenin/gliadin ratio with gliadin synthesis being maintained or increased [103]. This is explained by the molecular mechanism that there are heat-shock elements (HSE) in the upstream of coding regions of gliadin but not for glutenin [104,105]. However, the effect also depends on genotypes. Stone and Nicolas [18] reported variety difference in glutenin/gliadin ratio in response to heat stress where only one variety (Oxley) showed a decrease in this ratio and Sun 9E-16 increased in this component while the other three varieties had no significant response to high temperature. This suggested that wheat varieties vary in their response of gliadin synthesis to heat stress. The second hypothesis is that heat shocks lower the degree of polymerization of glutenin subunits and reduce the large sized glutenin polymers by altering the formation of disulphide bonds between glutenin peptides therefore weakening the dough properties [106]. In addition, heat-shock proteins (HSP) play an important role in determining the dough-protein function. On one hand, HSP per se is involved in guiding the formation, folding and polymerization of peptides in the grain and can disaggregate and hydrolyze deformed proteins under stress conditions. Therefore, under heat stress, HSP may break off the glutenin synthesis and polymerization thus influencing dough structure [99]. On the other hand, the synthesis of HSP and their prevailing presence in the mature grain could result in the heat-related loss of dough quality. However, according to Blumenthal et al. [102], although the concentration of HSP 70 in mature grain increased under a few days’ heat treatment, there was no strong correlation between the amount of HSP 70 and the loss of dough strength. Moreover, they failed to find the presence of HSE in the upstream coding region of the genes for HMW-GS, suggesting that the weakening of dough properties under heat stress may be more relevant to the degree of polymerization of glutenin molecules and the roles of HSP family during grain development.
Besides GPC, heat stress also affects mineral nutrition of wheat grains with a general decline in the concentration of micronutrients, especially Fe, Zn and Mn [38,107], but the results strongly depend on varieties and meteorological factors. For example, Dias et al. [108] reported that under heat stress, Fe concentration in the stems and leaves decreased in bread wheat but increased in durum wheat, and Mn concentration increased significantly in shoot during grain-filling stage for all genotypes except Golia, which is a less heat tolerant genotype. In addition, Kumar et al. [107] reported that under heat stress, the accumulation of Fe and Mn in flag leaf and spike diminished significantly during booting and grain-filling stages, while some of the varieties showed increased accumulation of micronutrients in either flag leaf or spike. Narendra et al. [109] found a high Zn or Fe content in some heat-tolerant varieties under heat stress, suggesting that these genotypes can be used for future breeding to cope with the problem of malnutrition. Furthermore, it is reported that the proportions of gliadins and polymeric protein were less affected by heat stress in the grain with high Zn concentrations, indicating that grain Zn nutrition may interact with grain-filling temperatures and alter protein composition under heat stress [110].

5. The Interactive Effects of eCO2 and Heat Stress on Wheat Plants

So far, there are many studies of plant response to single eCO2 or high temperature stress, but the research on the combined effect of these two factors on wheat plants is quite limited, especially on grain quality traits. Kadam et al. [111] summarized that the eCO2 × high temperature interaction strongly depends on the growth and developmental stages of plants. During vegetative stage, heat stress decreases net CO2 assimilation rates in wheat grown under aCO2, but eCO2 moderates the negative effect of heat stress on canopy photosynthesis. This is because increased temperature will decrease the ratio of solubility of CO2 and of O2 in water and reduce the specificity of Rubisco for CO2 relative to O2 [112], leading to a preference to oxygenation rather than carboxylation in C3 photosynthesis. Rising CO2 concentration can inhibit photorespiration and increase ribulose bisphosphate (RuBp) regeneration capacity thus increasing the net photosynthesis. However, the response varies between species. For example, in rice, leaf photosynthesis increased up to 63%, while in sorghum, the increase was not significant [111]. In wheat, Abdelhakim et al. [113] tested the physiological responses of different spring wheat genotypes of heat-tolerance to eCO2 × heat interaction and found that under eCO2, all genotypes showed higher photosynthetic rate and maintained maximum quantum efficiency of PSII under heat stress compared to aCO2.
Despite the advantage brought by eCO2 on the vegetative tissue, during the reproductive phase (especially anthesis and grain-filling stage), temperature is the main factor determining the wheat grain yield and quality when exposed to both eCO2 and heat stress [111]. This is due to the irreversible damage of high temperatures to the anabolic and metabolic processes in wheat flowers and grains, which has been mentioned in other studies only focusing on the heat stress effects [11,25]. Chavan et al. [81] reported that although eCO2 alleviates the negative impact of heat stress on photosynthesis in wheat, grain yield was reduced equally under aCO2 and eCO2 by heat stress due to grain abortion and shortened grain filling duration. Moreover, Macabuhay et al. [114] found an increase in stem water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) under eCO2 in both control and heat stressed wheat plants; however, there is limitation of WSC translocation to grains under heat stress, which decreases WSC remobilization. Therefore, the overriding impact of heat stress on crop production seems to limit the potential benefits provided by carbon fertilization of eCO2. However, there are some positive responses of wheat in the combined situation (reviewed by Kadam et al. [111]) such as increase in grain yield, number of ears and harvest index. While for thousand grain weight, number of spikelets and grain number, the results were inconsistent, indicating a partial ameliorative effect of eCO2 on grain yield when combined with heat stress. Furthermore, varietal difference, seasonal conditions and different experimental treatment applied also contribute to the inconsistency of the plant response under such situation. Besides, the interaction of weeds such as little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium murale) in wheat field could accelerate the yield loss under eCO2 and thermal scenario due to the similar photosynthetic pathway and nutritional level in weeds and main crop, and the greater response of weeds than crop to eCO2 condition [115].
Although eCO2 cannot buffer the negative impact of heat stress on reproductive stage, the reduction of grain N concentration under eCO2 could be slightly alleviated in heat-treated plants because N accumulation is less sensitive to temperature than C in wheat grain resulting in less carbohydrates relative to N [114]. However, overall, the grain quality seems to decrease in the case of eCO2 and high temperature combined situation mainly due to the reduction of storage protein under both conditions [33,116], especially the synthesis of GLUT polymers leading to a diminished dough functionality and baking quality. The effect of eCO2 and heat stress interactions on mineral nutrient composition of wheat grains was rarely investigated. However, a study in rice under field conditions showed a significant decrease in grain mineral content, including Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn under combined eCO2 and heat stress situation across different cultivars. Moreover, some of the micronutrients (Cu, Fe and Zn) were reduced more prominently as compared to eCO2 alone [117], suggesting that heat stress may further exacerbate the negative effect of eCO2 on grain mineral nutrition.

6. Conclusions

Although eCO2 increases wheat grain yield, its negative impact on grain quality poses a great threat to human nutrition. This is mainly due to the dilution effect by higher accumulation of photosynthetic assimilates of C and the decreased root N uptake associated with lower transpiration rate and mass flow under eCO2. Heat stress generally counteracts the positive effect of eCO2 on yield components and may aggravate the negative effect of eCO2 on grain quality because wheat is quite sensitive to high temperature stress especially during anthesis and grain-filling stage, which leads to permanent and irreversible damage during flower and grain development. However, grain quality is strongly dependent on variety and environment, and different quality attributes show diverse responses to abiotic stresses. Since eCO2 cannot protect wheat plants from high temperature stress, other environmental factors should be taken into consideration, such as enhancing nutrient fertilizing and improving soil water content, etc. Selecting and breeding new genotypes of heat tolerance could be another way to deal with climate change and the increasing demand for food. Moreover, the contemporary crop models for evaluating the effects of different environmental conditions on wheat quality can provide new insights into adaptation strategies to cope with the impacts of climate change on global crop production and grain quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W. and F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, F.L.; supervision, F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The article does not contain original data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mirza, M.M.Q. Climate change and extreme weather events: Can developing countries adapt? Clim. Policy 2003, 3, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ray, D.K.; West, P.C.; Clark, M.; Gerber, J.S.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Chatterjee, S. Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shewry, P.R.; Hey, S.J. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015, 4, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, L.; Feng, Z.; Schjoerring, J.K. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on physiology and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A meta-analytic test of current hypotheses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 178, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Högy, P.; Wieser, H.; Köhler, P.; Schwadorf, K.; Breuer, J.; Franzaring, J.; Muntifering, R.; Fangmeier, A. Effects of elevated CO2 on grain yield and quality of wheat: Results from a 3-year free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Myers, S.S.; Zanobetti, A.; Kloog, I.; Huybers, P.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Bloom, A.J.; Carlisle, E.; Dietterich, L.H.; Fitzgerald, G.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 2014, 510, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Loladze, I. Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: Toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Loladze, I. Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO2 depletes minerals at the base of human nutrition. Elife 2014, 2014, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cossani, C.M.; Reynolds, M.P. Physiological Traits for Improving Heat Tolerance in Wheat 1 [W]. Plant Physiol. 2020, 160, 1710–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Melaku, T.A. Environmental Impact on Processing Quality of Wheat Grain. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farooq, M.; Bramley, H.; Palta, J.A.; Siddique, K.H.M.M. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McDonald, G.K.; Sutton, B.G.; Ellison, F.W. The effect of time of sowing on the grain yield of irrigated wheat in the Namoi Valley, New South Wales. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1983, 34, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mullarkey, M.; Jones, P. Isolation and analysis of thermotolerant mutants of wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wardlaw, I.F.; Wrigley, C.W. Heat Tolerance in Temperate Cereals: An Overview. Funct. Plant Biol. 1994, 21, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saini, H.S.; Aspinall, D. Abnormal sporogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by short periods of high temperature. Ann. Bot. 1982, 49, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaše, M.; Čatský, J. Maintenance and growth components of dark respiration rate in leaves of C3 and C4 plants as affected by leaf temperature. Biol. Plant. 1984, 26, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blumenthal, C.S.; Barlow, E.W.R.; Wrigley, C.W. Growth environment and wheat quality: The effect of heat stress on dough properties and gluten proteins. J. Cereal Sci. 1993, 18, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stone, P.; Nicolas, M. Wheat Cultivars Vary Widely in Their Responses of Grain Yield and Quality to Short Periods of Post-Anthesis Heat Stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 1994, 21, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fleitas, M.C.; Mondal, S.; Gerard, G.S.; Hernández-Espinosa, N.; Singh, R.P.; Crossa, J.; Guzmán, C. Identification of CIMMYT spring bread wheat germplasm maintaining superior grain yield and quality under heat-stress. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Williams, R.M.; O’Brien, L.; Eagles, H.A.; Solah, V.A.; Jayasena, V. The influences of genotype, environment, and genotype ¾ environment interaction on wheat quality. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2008, 59, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández-Espinosa, N.; Mondal, S.; Autrique, E.; Gonzalez-Santoyo, H.; Crossa, J.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Singh, R.P.; Guzmán, C. Milling, processing and end-use quality traits of CIMMYT spring bread wheat germplasm under drought and heat stress. Field Crop. Res. 2018, 215, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Hernandez-Espinosa, N.; Peña, R.J. The influence of drought and heat stress on the expression of end-use quality parameters of common wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 57, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kimball, B.A.; Pinter, P.J.; Garcia, R.L.; Lamorte, R.L.; Wall, G.W.; Hunsaker, D.J.; Wechsung, G.; Wechsung, F.; Kartschall, T. Productivity and water use of wheat under free-air CO2 enrichment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1995, 1, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morison, J.I.L. Response of plants to CO2 under water limited conditions. Vegetatio 1993, 104, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peña, R.J. Wheat for bread and other foods. In Bread Wheat Improvement and Production; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; pp. 483–542. [Google Scholar]
  27. Battenfield, S.D.; Guzmán, C.; Gaynor, R.C.; Singh, R.P.; Peña, R.J.; Dreisigacker, S.; Fritz, A.K.; Poland, J.A. Genomic Selection for Processing and End-Use Quality Traits in the CIMMYT Spring Bread Wheat Breeding Program. Plant Genome 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Zhao, L.; Zhang, K.P.; Liu, B.; Deng, Z.Y.; Qu, H.L.; Tian, J.C. A comparison of grain protein content QTLs and flour protein content QTLs across environments in cultivated wheat. Euphytica 2010, 174, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coles, G.D.; Hartunian-Sowa, S.M.; Jamieson, P.D.; Hay, A.J.; Atwell, W.A.; Fulcher, R.G. Environmentally-induced variation in starch and non-starch polysaccharide content in wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 1997, 26, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arena, S.; D’Ambrosio, C.; Vitale, M.; Mazzeo, F.; Mamone, G.; Di Stasio, L.; Maccaferri, M.; Curci, P.L.; Sonnante, G.; Zambrano, N.; et al. Differential representation of albumins and globulins during grain development in durum wheat and its possible functional consequences. J. Proteom. 2017, 162, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wieser, H.; Seilmeier, W. The influence of nitrogen fertilisation on quantities and proportions of different protein types in wheat flour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 76, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Payne, P.I.; Holt, L.M.; Jackson, E.A.; Law, C.N.; Damania, A.B.; Trans, P.; Lond, R.S. Wheat storage proteins: Their genetics and their potential for manipulation by plant breeding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1984, 304, 359–371. [Google Scholar]
  33. Daniel, C.; Triboi, E. Effects of temperature and nitrogen nutrition on the grain composition of winter wheat: Effects on gliadin content and composition. J. Cereal Sci. 2000, 32, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dier, M.; Hüther, L.; Schulze, W.X.; Erbs, M.; Köhler, P.; Weigel, H.J.; Manderscheid, R.; Zörb, C. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Has Limited Effect on Wheat Grain Quality Regardless of Nitrogen Supply. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3711–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Uhlen, A.K.; Hafskjold, R.; Kalhovd, A.H.; Sahlström, S.; Longva, Å.; Magnus, E.M. Effects of cultivar and temperature during grain filling on wheat protein content, composition, and dough mixing properties. Cereal Chem. 1998, 75, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kunkulberga, D.; Linina, A.; Ruza, A. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on protein content and rheological properties of winter wheat wholemeal. Foodbalt 2019, 2019, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Hernandez-espinosa, N.; Peña, R.J. Heat and drought stress on durum wheat: Responses of genotypes, yield, and quality parameters. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 57, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guzmán, C.; Autrique, J.E.; Mondal, S.; Singh, R.P.; Govindan, V.; Morales-dorantes, A.; Posadas-Romano, G.; Crossa, J.; Ammar, K.; Javier, R.; et al. Response to drought and heat stress on wheat quality, with special emphasis on bread-making quality, in durum wheat. Field Crop. Res. 2016, 186, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joshi, A.K.; Crossa, J.; Arun, B.; Chand, R.; Trethowan, R.; Vargas, M.; Ortiz-monasterio, I. Genotype x environment interaction for zinc and iron concentration of wheat grain in eastern Gangetic plains of India. Field Crop. Res. 2010, 116, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Long, S.P.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A.; Ort, D.R. Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Plants FACE the future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 591–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Broberg, M.C.; Högy, P.; Feng, Z.; Pleijel, H. Effects of elevated CO2 on wheat yield: Non-linear response and relation to site productivity. Agronomy 2019, 9, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Wardlaw, I.F.; Porter, H.K. The redistribution of stem sugars in wheat during grain development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1967, 20, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Evans, L.T.; Rawson, H.M. Photosynthesis and respiration by the flag leaf and components of the ear during grain development in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1970, 23, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ainsworth, E.A. Rice production in a changing climate: A meta-analysis of responses to elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone concentration. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 1642–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Chen, N.; Xiong, Z.; Wolfe, D.; Zou, J. Response of rice production to elevated [CO2] and its interaction with rising temperature or nitrogen supply: A meta-analysis. Clim. Chang. 2015, 130, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lv, C.; Huang, Y.; Sun, W.; Yu, L.; Zhu, J. Response of rice yield and yield components to elevated [CO2]: A synthesis of updated data from FACE experiments. Eur. J. Agron. 2020, 112, 125961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barnes, J.D.; Ollerenshaw, J.H.; Whitfield, C.P. Effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on growth, development and physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Glob. Chang. Biol. 1995, 1, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kimball, B.A. Carbon Dioxide and Agricultural Yield: An Assemblage and Analysis of 430 Prior Observations 1. Agron. J. 1983, 75, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dong, J.; Gruda, N.; Li, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Duan, Z. Sustainable vegetable production under changing climate: The impact of elevated CO2 on yield of vegetables and the interactions with environments-A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fierro, A.; Tremblay, N.; Gosselin, A. Supplemental carbon dioxide and light improved tomato and pepper seedling growth and yield. HortScience 1994, 29, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Demmers-Derks, H.; Mitchell, R.A.C.; Mitchell, V.J.; Lawlor, D.W. Response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and biochemical composition to elevated CO2 and temperature at two nitrogen applications. Plant Cell Environ. 1998, 21, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Chumley, H.; Hewlings, S. The effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide [CO2] on micronutrient concentration, specifically iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in rice; a systematic review. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 1571–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dong, J.; Gruda, N.; Lam, S.K.; Li, X.; Duan, Z. Effects of elevated CO2 on nutritional quality of vegetables: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Taub, D.R.; Miller, B.; Allen, H. Effects of elevated CO2 on the protein concentration of food crops: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, G.; Gu, H.; Huang, J.; Zhu, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, G.; Han, Y. The impact of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and nitrogen supply on grain quality of rice. Field Crop. Res. 2007, 102, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, X.; Jiang, D.; Liu, F. Dynamics of amino acid carbon and nitrogen and relationship with grain protein in wheat under elevated CO2 and soil warming. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 132, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Blandino, M.; Badeck, F.W.; Giordano, D.; Marti, A.; Rizza, F.; Scarpino, V.; Vaccino, P. Elevated CO2 Impact on Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield, Wholemeal Quality, and Sanitary Risk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10574–10585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Panozzo, J.F.; Walker, C.K.; Partington, D.L.; Neumann, N.C.; Tausz, M.; Seneweera, S.; Fitzgerald, G.J. Elevated carbon dioxide changes grain protein concentration and composition and compromises baking quality. A FACE study. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Erbs, M.; Manderscheid, R.; Jansen, G.; Seddig, S.; Pacholski, A.; Weigel, H.J. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in a crop rotation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 136, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fernando, N.; Panozzo, J.; Tausz, M.; Norton, R.; Fitzgerald, G.; Seneweera, S. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration affects mineral nutrient and protein concentration of wheat grain. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Taub, D.R.; Wang, X. Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO2? A critical examination of the hypotheses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kuehny, J.S.; Peet, M.M.; Nelson, P.V.; Willits, D.H. Nutrient dilution by starch in CO2-enriched chrysanthemum. J. Exp. Bot. 1991, 42, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pandey, V.; Sharma, M.; Deeba, F.; Maurya, V.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Singh, S.P.; Mishra, A.; Nautiyal, C.S. Impact of Elevated CO2 on Wheat Growth and Yield under Free Air CO2 Enrichment Impact of Elevated CO2 on Wheat Growth and Yield under Free Air CO2 Enrichment. Am. J. Clim. Chang. 2017, 6, 573–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  64. Gifford, R.M.; Barrett, D.J.; Lutze, J.L. The effects of elevated [CO2] on the C:N and C:P mass ratios of plant tissues. Plant Soil 2000, 224, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Henning, F.P.; Wood, C.W.; Rogers, H.H.; Runion, G.B.; Prior, S.A. Composition and decomposition of soybean and sorghum tissues grown under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Qual. 1996, 25, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chu, C.C.; Field, C.B.; Mooney, H.A.; Chu, C.C.; Field, C.B.; Mooney, H.A. Effects of CO2 and nutrient enrichment on tissue quality of two California annuals. Oecologia 1996, 107, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hattenschwiler, S.; Schweingruber, F.H.; Korner, C. Tree ring responses to elevated CO2 and increased N deposition in Picea abies. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Davidson, R.L. Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann. Bot. 1969, 33, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. BassiriRad, H.; Gutschick, V.P.; Lussenhop, J. Root system adjustments: Regulation of plant nutrient uptake and growth responses to elevated CO2. Oecologia 2001, 126, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ellsworth, D.S.; Reich, P.B.; Naumburg, E.S.; Koch, G.W.; Kubiske, M.E.; Smith, S.D. Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 2121–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  71. Runion, G.B.; Entry, J.A.; Prior, S.A.; Mitchell, R.J.; Rogers, H.H. Tissue chemistry and carbon allocation in seedlings of Pinus palustris subjected to elevated atmospheric CO2 and water stress. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  72. Li, X.; Jiang, D.; Liu, F. Soil warming enhances the hidden shift of elemental stoichiometry by elevated CO2 in wheat. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Poorter, H.; Nagel, O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: A quantitative review. Funct. Plant Biol. 2000, 27, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  74. Bazzaz, F.A. Ecological Society of America effects of c02 and temperature on growth and. Ecology 2015, 73, 1244–1259. [Google Scholar]
  75. Israel, D.W.; Rufty, T.W., Jr.; Cure, J.D. Nitrogen and phosphorus nutritional interactions in a CO2 enriched environment. J. Plant Nutr. 1990, 13, 1419–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zerihun, A.; Gutschick, V.P.; Bassirirad, H. Compensatory roles of nitrogen uptake and photosynthetic N-use efficiency in determining plant growth response to elevated CO2: Evaluation using a functional balance model. Ann. Bot. 2000, 86, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chu, C.C.; Coleman, J.S.; Mooney, H.A.; Chu, C.C.; Coleman, J.S.; Mooney, H.A. Controls of biomass partitioning between roots and shoots: Atmospheric CO2 enrichment and the acquisition and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in wild radish. Oecologia 1992, 89, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gloser, V.; Frehner, M.; Luscher, A.; Nosberger, J.; Hartwig, U.A. Does the response of perennial ryegrass to elevated CO2 concentration depend on the from of the supplied nitrogen? Biol. Plant. 2002, 45, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Locke, A.M.; Ort, D.R. Diurnal depression in leaf hydraulic conductance at ambient and elevated [CO2] reveals anisohydric water management in fi eld-grown soybean and possible involvement of aquaporins. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 116, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mcgrath, J.M.; Lobell, D.B. Reduction of transpiration and altered nutrient allocation contribute to nutrient decline of crops grown in elevated CO2 concentrations. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chavan, S.G.; Duursma, R.A.; Tausz, M.; Ghannoum, O. Elevated CO2 alleviates the negative impact of heat stress on wheat physiology but not on grain yield. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 6447–6459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, J.; Sears, R.G.; Gill, B.S.; Paulsen, G.M. Genotypic differences in utilization of assimilate sources during maturation of wheat under chronic and heat shock stresses: Utilization of assimilate sources by wheat under heat stresses. Euphytica 2002, 125, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wrigley, C.; Blumenthal, C.; Gras, P.; Barlow, E. Temperature Variation during Grain Filling and Changes in Wheat-Grain Quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 1994, 21, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Castro, M.; Peterson, C.J.; Rizza, M.D.; Dellavalle, P.D.í.; Vázquez, D.; IbáÑez, V.; Ross, A. Influence of Heat Stress on Wheat Grain Characteristics and Protein Molecular Weight Distribution. Mol. Breed. Forage Turf 2007, 12, 365–371. [Google Scholar]
  85. Spiertz, J.H.J.; Hamer, R.J.; Xu, H.; Primo-Martin, C.; Don, C.; van der Putten, P.E.L. Heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Effects on grain growth and quality traits. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sofield, I.; Evans, L.; Cook, M.; Wardlaw, I. Factors Influencing the Rate and Duration of Grain Filling in Wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 1977, 4, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Corbellini, M.; Canevar, M.G.; Mazza, L.; Ciaffi, M.; Lafiandra, D.; Borghi, B. Effect of the duration and intensity of heat shock during grain filling on dry matter and protein accumulation, technological quality and protein composition in bread wheat and durum wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 1997, 24, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhullar, S.; Jenner, C. Differential Responses to High Temperatures of Starch and Nitrogen Accumulation in the Grain of Four Cultivars of Wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 1985, 12, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Randall, P.J.; Moss, H.J. Some effects of temperature regime during grain filling on wheat quality. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1990, 41, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ferris, R.; Ellis, R.H.; Wheeler, T.R.; Hadley, P. Effect of High Temperature Stress at Anthesis on Grain Yield and Biomass of Field-grown Crops of Wheat. Ann. Bot. 1998, 82, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  91. Stone, P.J.; Nicolas, M.E. The effect of duration of heat stress during grain filling on two wheat varieties differing in heat tolerance: Grain growth and fractional protein accumulation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 25, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tahir, I.S.A.; Nakata, N. Remobilization of nitrogen and carbohydrate from stems of bread wheat in response to heat stress during grain filling. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Viswanathan, C.; Khanna-Chopra, R. Effect of heat stress on grain growth, starch synthesis and protein synthesis in grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties differing in grain weight stability. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2001, 186, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wardlaw, F.; Sofieldb, I.; Cartwrightc, P.M. Factors Limiting the Rate of Dry Matter Accumulation in the Grain of Wheat Grown at High Temperature. Funct. Plant Biol. 1980, 7, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bechtel, D.B.; Zayas, I.; Kaleikau, L.; Pomeranz, Y. Size-Distribution of Wheat Starch Granules during Endosperm Development.pdf. Cereal Chem. 1990, 67, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  96. Hurkman, W.J.; McCue, K.F.; Altenbach, S.B.; Korn, A.; Tanaka, C.K.; Kothari, K.M.; Johnson, E.L.; Bechtel, D.B.; Wilson, J.D.; Anderson, O.D.; et al. Effect of temperature on expression of genes encoding enzymes for starch biosynthesis in developing wheat endosperm. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ball, S.G.; Van De Wal, M.H.; Visser, R.G.F. Progress in understanding the biosynthesis of amylose. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Myers, A.M.; Morell, M.K.; James, M.G.; Ball, S.G. Update on Biochemistry Recent Progress toward Understanding Biosynthesis of the Amylopectin Crystal 1. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  99. Nuttall, J.G.; O’Leary, G.J.; Panozzo, J.F.; Walker, C.K.; Barlow, K.M.; Fitzgerald, G.J. Models of grain quality in wheat—A review. Field Crop. Res. 2017, 202, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  100. Keeling, P.L.; Bacon, P.J.; Holt, D.C. Elevated temperature reduces starch deposition in wheat endosperm by reducing the activity of soluble starch synthase. Planta 1993, 191, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rijven, A.H.G.C. Heat Inactivation of Starch Synthase in Wheat Endosperm Tissue. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Blumenthal, C.; Stone, P.J.; Gras, P.W.; Bekes, F.; Clarke, B.; Barlow, E.W.R.; Appels, R.; Wrigley, C.W. Heat-shock protein 70 and dough-quality changes resulting from heat stress during grain filling in wheat. Cereal Chem. 1998, 75, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Majoul, T.; Bancel, E.; Triboi, E.; Ben Hamida, J.; Branlard, G. Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: Characterization of heat-responsive proteins from total endosperm. Proteomics 2003, 3, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Blumenthal, C.S.; Batey, I.L.; Bekes, F.; Wrigley, C.W.; Barlow, E.W.R. Gliadin genes contain heat-shock elements: Possible relevance to heat-induced changes in grain quality. J. Cereal Sci. 1990, 11, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Blumenthal, C.; Batey, I.; Wrigley, C.; Barlow, E. Involvement of a Novel Peptide in the Heat Shock Response of Australian Wheats. Funct. Plant Biol. 1990, 17, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ciaffi, M.; Colapricoz, B.M.G.; De Stefanis, E. Effect of high temperature during grain filling on the amount of insoluble proteins in durum wheat. J. Genet. Breed. 1995, 49, 285–296. [Google Scholar]
  107. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P.; Singh, S.K. Comparative study of Fe and Mn micronutrient accumulation in flag leaf and spike of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under heat stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 2979–2982. [Google Scholar]
  108. Dias, A.S.; Lidon, F.C.; Ramalho, J.C. IV. Heat stress in triticum: Kinetics of Fe and Mn accumulation. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 21, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Narendra, M.C.; Roy, C.; Kumar, S.; Virk, P.; De, N. Effect of terminal heat stress on physiological traits, grain zinc and iron content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2021, 57, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  110. Peck, A.W.; Mcdonald, G.K.Ã.; Graham, R.D. Zinc nutrition influences the protein composition of flour in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 47, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kadam, N.N.; Xiao, G.; Melgar, R.J.; Bahuguna, R.N.; Quinones, C.; Tamilselvan, A.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Agronomic and physiological responses to high temperature, drought, and elevated CO2 interactions in cereals. Adv. Agron. 2014, 127, 111–156. [Google Scholar]
  112. LONG, S.P. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: Has its importance been underestimated? Plant. Cell Environ. 1991, 14, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Abdelhakim, L.O.A.; Palma, C.F.F.; Zhou, R.; Wollenweber, B.; Ottosen, C.O.; Rosenqvist, E. The effect of individual and combined drought and heat stress under elevated CO2 on physiological responses in spring wheat genotypes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Macabuhay, A.; Houshmandfar, A.; Nuttall, J.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Tausz, M.; Tausz-Posch, S. Can elevated CO2 buffer the effects of heat waves on wheat in a dryland cropping system? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kannojiya, S.; Singh, S.D.; Prasad, S.; Kumar, S.; Malav, L.C.; Kumar, V. Effect of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on wheat (Triticum aestivum) productivity with and without weed interaction. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 89, 751–756. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wieser, H.; Manderscheid, R.; Erbs, M.; Weigel, H.-J. Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on the Quantitative Protein Composition of Wheat Grain. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6531–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Bahuguna, R.N.; Pal, M.; Shah, D.; Maurya, S.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Elevated CO2 and heat stress interactions affect grain yield, quality and mineral nutrient composition in rice under field conditions. Field Crop. Res. 2017, 206, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Possible mechanisms explaining the effects of eCO2 on wheat grain quality.
Figure 1. Possible mechanisms explaining the effects of eCO2 on wheat grain quality.
Plants 10 01027 g001
Table 1. The effects of heat stress on different grain quality traits.
Table 1. The effects of heat stress on different grain quality traits.
TraitsImpactsReferences
Gliadin/glutenin ratio+/−/ns[17,18]
Grain protein content (GPC)+[21,35]
Starch content[86,87,88]
Dough strength (W)+/−/ns[21,37,38]
Gluten extensibility (L)+[19,22]
Dough tenacity (P)[22]
Bread loaf volume (LV)+[22,38]
Micronutrient concentration (Zn, Fe)+/−[38,39]
The “+” sign indicates an increase and the “−” sign indicates a decrease in the performance of the trait of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Liu, F. Effects of Elevated CO2 and Heat on Wheat Grain Quality. Plants 2021, 10, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10051027

AMA Style

Wang X, Liu F. Effects of Elevated CO2 and Heat on Wheat Grain Quality. Plants. 2021; 10(5):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10051027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xizi, and Fulai Liu. 2021. "Effects of Elevated CO2 and Heat on Wheat Grain Quality" Plants 10, no. 5: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10051027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop