1. Introduction
One of the principles of the European Green Deal is the proposal of greenhouse gas emissions cut by at least 55% by the year 2030, which should set Europe to a path to becoming climate-neutral by the year 2050 [
1]. According to the European Biogas Association (EBA), biogas, biomethane, and other renewable gases will play a key role in helping Europe’s transition to a clean energy system [
2], and the European Commission’s strategies promise targeted support for biogas in the revised Renewable Energy Directive and gas legislation. EBA, Eurogas, and the Gas for Climate consortium are calling for an EU-wide renewable target of at least 11%. The annual production of biogas in Europe reaches 15.8 bcm and is relatively stable with a total of 18,943 biogas plants according to the EBA [
3].
A biogas plant produces biogas, which can then be used for the cogeneration of electricity and heat. Biogas is a mixture of methane, carbon dioxide, and other components such as hydrogen sulfide (H
2S) [
4]. The biogas must be pretreated before use. The first step of the purification process is the removal of H
2S, which is corrosive and harmful to health [
5,
6]. Biogas production is thus associated with the production of waste products. The utilization of waste sulfur obtained from the purification process seems to be promising from the point of view of plant nutrition and especially from the economic aspect of biogas production [
7,
8] and sulfur deficiency in the environment.
European SO
2 emissions have been reduced by 70–80% since 1990 [
9,
10]. According to results of Engardt et al. [
11], sulfur deposition in Europe will decrease until, at least, 2050. For example, in the Czech Republic, atmospheric sulfur deposition is about 5 kg/ha per year [
12], so there is a shortage of sulfur in the soil, as it has been presented by many authors [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18]. According to Zbíral et al. [
19], a statistically highly significant decrease in the soil S content caused by reduction of SO
2 emissions in the long-term field experiments in Czech Republic from 33 mg/kg in 1981 to 8 mg/kg in 2017. Therefore, it is necessary to pay special attention to fertilization by sulfur in addition to the other essential nutrients, especially because of the increased cultivation of crops with high sulfur requirements [
19,
20]. Sulfur in plants is essential for the synthesis of cysteine, methionine, and some vitamins [
21]. The deficiency of sulfur in maize as the main crop for biogas production not only reduces yield but also quality parameters such as the content of starch, carbohydrates, and proteins [
22]. Sulfur is usually applied in the form of mineral fertilizers, and co-application with nitrogen is recommended by many authors as these nutrients have been proven to have good synergy [
23,
24]. Salvagiotti and Miralles [
25] showed that S addition increased the biomass and grain yield of cereal and the positive interaction of N and S, which resulted in a greater nitrogen use efficiency. A shortage of S supply also lowers the utilization of nitrogen and results in a deterioration in crop quality [
26]. As sulfur is an essential constituent of enzymes involved in nitrogen metabolism, its deficiency could lead to a decrease in N assimilation [
27,
28]. Some reports have shown the accumulation of nitrates in S-deficient plants [
29]. In addition, Haneklaus et al. [
30] reported that each kg of S deficit causes 15 kg of nitrogen to be lost in the environment. Maize is an important crop that, despite its relatively low sulfur requirements, is severely affected by its deficiency [
31,
32].
Nitrogen is essential for plants in terms of biomass and yield production [
33]. In addition to the conventional nitrogen fertilization of the soil, the nutritional status of the plants can be optimized by foliar fertilization during the plant growth [
34]. Foliar fertilization could be used under farming conditions as a quick correction for unexpected nutrient deficiencies, for the late supply of N (and another nutrients) during advanced growth stages, and as a preventive measure against unsuspected (or hidden) deficiencies [
35,
36,
37,
38]. The foliar application of nutrients is also recommended when the soil or the plant conditions limit the availability of some nutrients [
39] and is appropriate under conditions when high loss rates of soil-applied nutrients may occur [
40]. For example, the foliar application of nitrogen has significantly improved the grain yield of maize [
41] and other cereal crops [
42].
The aim of this study was to verify the effect of the foliar application of waste elemental sulfur from biogas production in combination with conventional liquid fertilizers UAN applied in different ratios. Such a reutilization of waste sulfur from biogas plants back in agriculture is suitable from the economic aspect of biogas purification and waste management. The application of this sulfur could help to reduce the consumption of mineral fertilizers and, at the same time, address the deficient sulfur content in the soil and plants.
2. Results and Discussion
The application of UAN fertilizer alone and in combination with sulfur increased the chlorophyll content (N-tester value) in maize leaves compared to the unfertilized control. The increase in chlorophyll was evident at both monitoring terms (t1 and t2), while the differences between the control (N-unfertilized treatment) and the N (UAN) and NS (UANS1-3)-fertilized treatments increased over time (
Table 1).
The N-tester values were significantly correlated with the rate of nitrogen applied in fertilizers at both terms, as presented in
Figure 1. The results agree with several studies that have reported a strong correlation between chlorophyll content and the amount of nitrogen in leaves [
43,
44,
45,
46,
47].
Nitrogen is part of the enzymes associated with chlorophyll synthesis [
48] and the chlorophyll concentration reflects relative crop N status. Statistically significant highest N-tester values were found for the treatment fertilized with UAN applied without sulfur (UAN) on both measurement terms (t1; t2). The highest nitrogen dose was applied on this treatment. The application of UAN in combination with elemental sulfur (UANS1–3) significantly increased the N-tester value compared to the unfertilized (control) treatment, but the level of chlorophyll content did not reach the values found in plants fertilized with UAN alone. While, in the first measurement term (t1), the highest N-tester value was found for the UANS2 treatment (
Table 1), in term t2, the N-tester values were in direct dependence on the nitrogen doses contained in the UAN–sulfur mixture. The N-tester values found at both terms (t1; t2) were significantly correlated with the plant nitrogen content detected at term t3 (r = 0.711,
p ˂ 0.001; r = 0.707,
p ˂ 0.001, respectively). Evaluation of the nutritional status after the joint application of nitrogen and sulfur using the N-tester was also performed on several dates by Lacroux et al. [
49], and their results showed a significant increase in measured values compared to the control, with the highest values achieved by the joint foliar application of N and S.
The ability of the photosystem II to absorb radiation is expressed by the variable chlorophyll fluorescence for dark-adapted leaves (
Fv). The more radiation a plant can absorb, the more radiation the plant can use for photosynthesis. Although the ability of the plant tissue to absorb radiation decreased over time (comparison of
Fv levels between t1 and t2), this decrease was not significant for the UAN and UAN combination with sulfur. A significant reduction in
Fv values was only observed in the unfertilized treatment (
Figure 2). Even though the treatment with the highest sulfur dose (UANS3) showed the lowest
Fv values, the results showed that the decrease in
Fv between terms t1 and t2 was smallest on this treatment. Nitrogen deficiency decreases the photosynthetic assimilation capacity of CO
2 of plant leaves, leading to decreases in light-saturated photosynthetic rates [
50]. In addition, Ciompi et al. [
51] and Jin et al. [
52] reported a positive correlation between the nitrogen content in the plant tissue of leaves and photosynthetic capacity.
After dark adaptation of the maize leaves, the maximum photosynthetic capacity (
ΦPSII) was estimated as the quotient between variable and maximum fluorescence (
Fv/
Fm). The quantum yield, which indicates the actual capacity for photochemical processes by the availability of reaction centers of the photosystem II (PSII), was significantly (
p ≤ 0.05) influenced by the fertilizer application (
Figure 3). It is clear that nitrogen significantly affects photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of the plant. This was demonstrated by the response of maize to nitrogen fertilization in a study by Ahmad et al. [
53], in which the effect of nitrogen application increased the electron transport rate, photochemical quenching coefficient, variable fluorescence, maximal quantum yield, and effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry. A significant increase in
ΦPSII values in three maize varieties due to a high nitrogen dose was demonstrated by Jin et al. [
52]. Reductions in the quantum yield of PSII electron transfer due to nitrogen deficiency were also described by Nunes et al. [
54] and Verhoeven et al. [
55]. In our study, the values of
ΦPSII were decreased over time regardless of fertilization treatment. The highest value of
ΦPSII was determined after the application of UAN with the highest elemental sulfur content (UANS3). These results contradict the above studies, but, on the other hand, they show a positive effect of applied sulfur on nitrogen utilization and its use by the plant. A high linear dependence between the efficiency of carbon fixation and quantum yield value was presented by Fryer et al. [
56].
The rate of fluorescence decline (
RFd), an empirical parameter for the quantification of plant vitality under tested conditions, was measured. In contrast to the values of the variable chlorophyll fluorescence (
Fv) and quantum yield of PSII (
ΦPSII), the rate of fluorescence decline was not statistically significantly affected by foliar fertilization. Only at term t2 did the
RFd value of plants grown on the UANS2 treatment decrease significantly below the control level, but no trend in the decrease in
RFd due to UAN fertilization in combination with elemental sulfur was observed (
Figure 4).
The average dry weight of the above-ground biomass (AGB) of plants determined on the 35th day after the foliar application of fertilizer (t3) is shown in
Figure 5. The highest plant dry weight was found for the treatment fertilized with UAN, which provided the most nitrogen to the plants. The dry weight of plants produced on this treatment was 2.4 times higher compared to the unfertilized Control. The dry weight of plants fertilized with the UANS fertilizer combination ranged from 17.44 to 17.84 g/plant and was not statistically different from the UAN treatment (
Figure 5). A significant effect of foliar nitrogen application on plant dry matter yield has been demonstrated in the available literature [
57,
58,
59], in agreement with our results. The increase in plant weight due to foliar sulfur fertilization was also documented. Perveen et al. [
60] observed a significant increase in root and shoot biomass and root and shoot length of maize grown under salinity conditions due to the foliar application of different sulfur compounds. An increased barley yield after elemental sulfur application was described by Grzebisz and Przygocka-Cyna [
61] in their long-term experiment. A positive effect of the foliar application of sulfur on canola pods formation and subsequent seed yield was demonstrated by Khalid et al. [
62].
The UAN fertilizer application significantly increased the nitrogen content of maize leaves. The highest N content, 10.3 g/kg DM, was found in leaves after the application of UAN fertilizer alone (
Table 2). There was no significant difference in plant N content among treatments fertilized with a mixture of UAN and elemental sulfur (UANS1-3), but the data showed a relative increase in N content with sulfur rate. An increased leaf N concentration following sulfur fertilization has also been described [
31,
63]. An increase in the nitrogen content of wheat grain, due to the foliar application of sulfur, was observed by Tea et al. [
64] and Rossini et al. [
65]. This effect could be due to a better assimilation of foliar-applied N and S compared to their soil-applied counterparts.
Sutar et al. [
22] described the critical sulfur concentration in dry matter of maize leaves as 1.5 g/kg DM. The sulfur content in the ABG of maize plants ranged from 2.8 to 3.6 g/kg DM (
Table 2). Its content in the ABG of plants grown on the treatments fertilized with a mixture of UAN and elemental sulfur (UANS1–3) was identical to that of unfertilized plants (Control). Only in the nitrogen-fertilized treatment (UAN) was the amount of sulfur significantly lowest (
Table 2). This fact is not only related to the absence of sulfur in the fertilizer, but it can also be explained by the dilution of nutrients in the maize plant tissue that occurred as a result of the increase in DM weight of AGB on this treatment (
Figure 5). Therefore, the nutrient uptake by the plant was calculated as a more appropriate parameter expressing the nutritional status of the plants (
Figure 6). Nutrient uptake is the relationship between the DM weight of AGB and its nutrient content, expressed in g of nutrient per plant (g/plant). Logically, the highest nitrogen uptake was recorded in the UAN-fertilized treatment, i.e., the treatment with the highest applied nitrogen rate. Even though nitrogen uptake by plants was not significantly different among the treatments fertilized with UAN and elemental sulfur mixtures, plants fertilized with fertilizers containing a higher proportion of elemental sulfur (UANS2 and UANS3) showed a higher uptake of nitrogen by plant AGB. A positive significant interaction between nitrogen and sulfur uptake and utilization was confirmed.
The N:S ratio of the plant may also be an interesting indicator of nutritional status, as reported by some authors [
31,
66]. The principle behind this assessment is the fact that plants need a balanced amount of nitrogen and sulfur for proper amino acid synthesis. Therefore, nitrogen-to-sulfur ratios above a N:S ratio threshold indicate S deficiency [
67]. A possible disadvantage of this assessment is the decreasing value of the N:S ratio during the growing season, as reported, for example, by Calvo et al. [
68,
69] or Scherer [
70]. A 15-19:1 N:S ratio has been reported as a limiting ratio for cereals at the time of tillering [
71], and an ideal N:S ratio for the optimum growth and development of maize is 15:1 [
72]. The observed N:S ratio (
Table 2) indicated that the sulfur contained in maize was not deficient in any of the fertilization treatments. From the ratios obtained, it is possible to observe the already described trend, where the highest ratio of nitrogen and sulfur was logically found on the treatment fertilized only with UAN fertilizer. In contrast to our study, significant changes in the N:S ratio after sulfur application were observed [
73,
74]. However, they agreed that an increase in the sulfur content of the plant does not necessarily predict increased yield. Sutradhar et al. [
31] also confirmed the same conclusion.
The previously mentioned synergism between nitrogen and sulfur can be documented by crop nitrogen use efficiency. The nitrogen supplied by foliar nutrition from fertilizer applied without sulfur addition (UAN) was utilized by the plant at 30.5% (
Table 3). A similar level of NUE
Crop was found on the treatment fertilized with the lowest sulfur fertilizer mixture (UANS1), whereas an increase in the proportion of sulfur in the fertilizer mixture increased nitrogen use efficiency. The relationship between nitrogen recovery from applied fertilizers and the dose of sulfur applied by the fertilizer mixture was statistically significant (NUE
Crop = 22.9 + 0.171 × sulfur dose, r = 0.709;
p = 0.002).
In agreement with our results, several studies showed that sulfur fertilization may increase NUE [
75,
76,
77]. As sulfur is an essential constituent of enzymes involved in nitrogen metabolism [
78], its deficiency may lead to ineffective utilization of the nitrogen content in plant [
79,
80]. An increase in nitrogen uptake by maize plants due to graded doses of foliar sulfur application was presented by Sarfaraz et al. [
81].