Next Article in Journal
General Limitations to Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungi Use as Plant Growth Promoters, Pests and Pathogens Biocontrol Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Periphytic Algae and Cyanobacteria from the Rio Doce Basin Respond Differently to Metals and Salinity, Showing Different Potential for Bioremediation
Previous Article in Journal
Embryogenesis of European Radish (Raphanus sativus L. subsp. sativus Convar. Radicula) in Culture of Isolated Microspores In Vitro
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Low Temperature, Nitrogen Starvation and Their Combination on the Photosynthesis and Metabolites of Thermosynechococcus E542: A Comparison Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interaction Effect of EDTA, Salinity, and Oxide Nanoparticles on Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas euryale

1
Laboratory of Environmental & Analytical Biochemistry of Contaminants, Department of Chemistry, University of Quebec at Montreal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
2
Centro Universitário—Católica de Santa Catarina, Rua Visconde de Taunay, 427, Joinville CEP-89203-005, SC, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Toxicologia Ambiental—LABTOX, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Campus Universitário, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis CEP-88040-970, SC, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(10), 2118; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102118
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 1 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 October 2021 / Published: 6 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Environmental Factors on Algae and Cyanobacteria)

Abstract

:
The interaction effects of organic ligand ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) and oxide nanoparticles (magnetite Fe3O4-NPs and copper CuO-NPs) were investigated during a 72 h period on two green algal species—Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under freshwater conditions and Chlamydomonas euryale under saltwater conditions. Fe3O4-NPs had larger agglomerates and very low solubility. CuO-NPs, having smaller agglomerates and higher solubility, were more toxic than Fe3O4-NPs in freshwater conditions for similar mass-based concentrations, especially at 72 h under 100 mg L−1. Furthermore, the effect of EDTA increased nanoparticle solubility, and the salinity caused a decrease in their solubility. Our results on C. euryale showed that the increase in salinity to 32 g L−1 caused the formation of larger nanoparticle agglomerates, leading to a decrease in the toxicity impact on algal cells. In addition, EDTA treatments induced a toxicity effect on both freshwater and saltwater Chlamydomonas species, by altering the nutrient uptake of algal cells. However, C. euryale was more resistant to EDTA toxicity than C. reinhardtii. Moreover, nanoparticle treatments caused a reduction in EDTA toxicity, especially for CuO-NPs. Therefore, the toxicity impact caused by these environmental factors should be considered in risk assessment for metallic nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials are widely used in industries for many technological applications. Nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4-NPs) are applied in magnetic resonance imaging and medical treatments, such as cancer [1] and in wastewater treatment [2,3,4]. Nanoparticles of copper oxide (CuO-NPs) are in fabrics and electronic products, providing antimicrobial and thermal conductivity properties [5,6]. In the long-term, massive production of these nanomaterials may represent a risk of contamination for aquatic environments, from their manufacturing into consumer products to their utilization and degradation [7].
It was previously suggested that the toxicity mechanisms of metallic NPs were dependent on their physicochemical properties [8,9,10,11]. Several studies investigated the toxicity effects of Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs on a wide variety of microorganisms, such as bacteria Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio fischeri and Streptococcus aureus [12,13], cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa [14], microalgae Chlorella vulgaris, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Coelastrella terrestris [13,15,16,17,18,19,20], and picoplankton Picochlorum sp. [21]. These studies focused on the cellular toxicity impact in a concentration–response relationship, related to the time of exposure. However, they did not consider the interaction effect of environmental parameters on the physicochemical and toxicity properties of tested NPs. Indeed, these properties might change due to abiotic conditions, such as light intensity, temperature degree, pH, salinity level, or organic ligands. Only one study previously investigated the effect of light on the toxicity of CuO-NPs by monitoring biological endpoints of the alga C. reinhardtii [22]. The authors demonstrated that the exposure to 0.8 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs combined with light-enhanced UVB radiation caused a synergistic toxicity impact on algal cells.
Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), known as a strong organic ligand, is widely used in detergents, wastewater treatment, pulp and paper industry, food products, and metal phytoremediation [23,24,25]. High concentrations of EDTA were found in rivers, showing the persistence of this compound in aquatic environments [24,26,27]. Ma et al. (2003) [28] showed that EDTA and fulvic acid significantly decreased the toxicity of copper on Scenedesmus subspicatus by complexing Cu ions. Another study on the macroalga Gracilaria domingensis showed that the toxicity effects of EDTA complexes with cadmium, copper, zinc, and lead were significantly lower compared to free metals [29]. Recently, Pascual et al. (2020) [30] demonstrated that the presence of EDTA in media was important to control the toxicity of copper, zinc, and lead on the growth of alga P. subcapitata. Moreover, it was suggested that organic ligands would tend to stabilize metallic NPs agglomerations (ZnS and Ag), from both electrostatic and steric effects [31,32,33]. However, the effect of organic ligands on the toxicological properties of non-functionalized metallic NPs was little investigated. One study previously reported that the fulvic acid of the Suwannee River increased the toxicity of CuO-NPs on the freshwater cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa, by increasing the dissolution of Cu ions and their absorption through the cell wall [14]. Therefore, more studies need to be conducted concerning the effect of organic ligands, such as EDTA, on the properties of metallic NPs and their combined toxicity effects on organisms.
In this study, the main objective was to investigate the interaction effect of environmental factors on the growth and viability of two green alga species—Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under freshwater conditions, and Chlamydomonas euryale under saltwater conditions. In fact, strains of the Chlamydomonas genus were widely used as model organisms in laboratory studies of stress conditions on algal physiology [34,35]. Here, the marine species C. euryale was, for the first time, used in abiotic stress toxicity testing. As environmental factors, we tested the change of salinity level (10 and 32 g L−1), the presence of organic ligand EDTA (10 and 100 mg L−1), and the effect of Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs (50 and 100 mg L−1). Therefore, the toxicity impact on algal cells is discussed according to the change of these environmental factors and their interactions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Salinity and EDTA on NPs Properties

In this study, we characterized NPs in suspension to determine the surface charge, the average hydrodynamic diameter, and the solubility property in relation to the change of salinity level and the concentration of EDTA. The obtained results showed that the chemical properties of both NPs in modified high salt medium (HSM) changed similarly related to the salinity level. Indeed, a stronger salinity level induced a higher ionic strength in the medium. The HSM freshwater condition had an ionic strength of 1.75 × 10−2 eq L−1, and the HSM with salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1 had 1.043 × 10−1 and 2.914 × 10−1 eq L−1, respectively. The results on zeta potential indicated that the ionic strength of HSM induced a negative surface charge to both NPs, and the charge intensity was higher for CuO-NPs compared to Fe3O4-NPs (Figure 1).
When comparing all conditions, the surface charge of both NPs showed a decrease in the intensity, which was correlated with the increase of the ionic strength. The results in Figure 1 showed that values of the Zeta potential of both NPs got closer to zero under salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1 in comparison to freshwater conditions. Consequently, this neutralizing effect of NPs surface charge caused an increase in NPs agglomeration, as indicated by the change of the hydrodynamic diameter distribution of particle size (Figure 2). The EDTA did not have a significant effect on the distribution of particle size diameters compared to the control for both NPs. Under salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1, the average hydrodynamic diameter of particles was 395–460 nm for tested 50 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs (Figure 2), whereas it was 165–190 nm for 50 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs (Figure 2). Therefore, these results indicated that a salinity from 10 g L−1 significantly induced the formation of larger agglomerates of NPs caused by a higher ionic strength in the medium.
When comparing both NPs in freshwater HSM (Figure 2), CuO-NPs did form smaller agglomerates (100–250 nm) than Fe3O4-NPs (200–450 nm). In fact, a higher intensity of the surface charge allowed the NPs dispersion to be more stable due to electrostatic repulsion forces. Our results showed that Fe3O4-NPs had a surface charge of −43.0 ± 2.1 mV, and −59.9 ± 2.4 mV for CuO-NPs (Figure 1). Since the HSM had a neutral pH, the isoelectric point of Fe3O4-NPs (6.5 ± 0.2) was much lower and near the neutral pH than the isoelectric point of CuO-NPs (9.5 ± 0.4), which explained the lower intensity of the surface charge for Fe3O4-NPs. Consequently, these zeta potential values explained the difference in the formation of agglomerates between the two NPs.
When comparing the effect of 50 and 100 mg L−1 of NPs, the intensity of the surface charge was not significantly affected (Figure 1). However, our results showed that a higher NPs concentration induced the formation of larger agglomerates (Figure 2). From 50 to 100 mg L−1 of NPs, the average of Fe3O4-NPs diameters increased by 100 nm in freshwater HSM (Figure 2), while it increased by 20 nm for CuO-NPs (Figure 2). Indeed, the formation of larger NPs agglomerates is explained here by more particle-particle interactions in the highest concentrated solution (100 mg L−1), destabilizing NPs dispersion in the medium [9]. For NPs at 100 mg L−1, salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1 caused significantly (p < 0.05) the formation of larger NPs agglomerates compared to freshwater condition. Our results indicated that, from 50 to 100 mg L−1 of NPs, the average of Fe3O4-NPs diameters increased by 135–160 nm (Figure 2), while it increased by 30–55 nm for CuO-NPs (Figure 2).
The solubility of NPs was also determined under various salinity and EDTA concentrations. Fe3O4-NPs had a very low solubility in freshwater HSM, and the methodology used did not permit to quantify the concentration as being less than the detection limit of the device (<0.02 mg L−1). The salinity and EDTA did not significantly affect the solubility of Fe3O4-NPs, when compared to the control. Considering known properties of metallic NPs in solution [9], the low solubility of Fe3O4-NPs was explained by the strong aggregation state of primary particles sintered (atoms held by strong chemical bonds), and to the formation of large agglomerates (suspensions held by weak van der Waals forces) reducing surface contact in solution. On the contrary, our results indicated that the solubility of CuO-NPs was correlated with the NPs concentration. The soluble fraction of free Cu released from 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs in freshwater HSM (no added salt and no EDTA) was of 0.17 and 0.33 mg L−1 per day, respectively (Figure 3). However, the salinity at 32 g L−1 caused a lower solubility of CuO-NPs (compared to controls for p < 0.05) reaching 0.07 and 0.11 mg L−1 per day, respectively, for 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs. Under this condition, the salinity caused the formation of larger agglomerates, reducing the surface contact in solution.
The interaction of EDTA with NPs increased significantly (p < 0.05) the solubility of CuO-NPs, which was concentration dependent (Figure 3). When CuO-NPs suspensions were exposed to 100 mg L−1 of EDTA in HSM, the soluble fraction of released Cu increased by 87 and 47 times compared to controls (p < 0.05) for 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs, respectively. The formation of EDTA complexes with metals can be estimated by the constant stability of the complex metal-ligand and the metal concentration [36]. The ionic forms of Cu and Fe are known to have a good affinity with EDTA compounds, since the dissociation constants of EDTA-metal complexes (pKc) are 18.8 for Cu2+, 14.3 for Fe2+, and 25.1 for Fe3+ [37]. However, the effect of EDTA on the solubility property of metallic NPs such as Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs has not been documented. Only one previous study investigated the effect of humic and fulvic acids on the release of Cu from Cu-NPs in solution [38]. The authors demonstrated that a high concentration of humic substances (100 mg L−1) was effective in promoting the dissolution of Cu-NPs during 24 h, and the release of Cu from NPs was able to reach 13.79 mg L−1. This phenomenon was explained by the complexation reactions between Cu-NP and the functional groups (carboxylic and/or phenolic) of humic acids. In fact, our results showed a similar effect of EDTA on the solubility of CuO-NPs. The EDTA compounds were able to interact with carboxylic groups of CuO-NPs, and the release of copper would remain solubilized as a complex EDTA-Cu or as free Cu2+ in solution. Therefore, our results suggested that the lack of chemical interaction between EDTA and Fe3O4-NPs was caused by its more complex atomic structure (aggregation state) compared to the simple oxide CuO-NPs. At high salinity (32 g L−1), the effect of 100 mg L−1 EDTA caused a release of 11.31 and 15.01 mg L−1 of Cu, respectively, for 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs. However, under this EDTA treatment, the concentration of released Cu significantly decreased by 29% and 24% when compared to HSM (no added salt for p < 0.05) for 50 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs under salinities of 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1, respectively. For 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs, the concentration of released Cu significantly decreased by 12% only under salinity of 10 g L−1 (Figure 3).

2.2. Toxicity Testing on Algal Cells

The effects of Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs was investigated during 72 h on algal cells of C. reinhardtii and C. euryale, and under different EDTA concentrations (Figure 4). The growth rate of C. reinhardtii exposed to Fe3O4-NPs (without EDTA) was not significantly affected in comparison to the control, but algal cells exposed to CuO-NPs at 50 and 100 mg L−1 showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05) by 8 and 19%, respectively (Figure 4). In addition, the EDTA induced a significant effect on the growth rate of C. reinhardtii in HSM compared to control (no EDTA and no NPs treatments). This inhibitory effect was of 34 and 75% (compared to control) under EDTA treatments of 10 and 100 mg L−1, respectively (Figure 4). However, the combined effect of EDTA and NPs treatments was different for Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs. Under high EDTA treatment (100 mg L−1), the growth rate of C. reinhardtii exposed to Fe3O4-NPs at 50 and 100 mg L−1 significantly decreased (p < 0.05) by 60 and 100%, respectively. On the other hand, the toxic effect of EDTA on the growth rate of C. reinhardtii was attenuated or completely neutralized by CuO-NPs in HSM (Figure 4). This phenomenon was explained by the high EDTA affinity to react with CuO-NPs suspensions in HSM, leaving algal cells free from EDTA effect.
The growth rate of C. euryale exposed to Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs was not significantly inhibited (compared to controls, p < 0.05) in HSM with salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1, even under EDTA effect (Figure 4). Only the effect of high EDTA concentration alone (100 mg L−1) induced a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the growth rate of C. euryale by 56–58% compared to controls. It was interesting to notice that this inhibitory effect was weaker compared to the effect on C. reinhardtii in HSM (75%), indicating that C. euryale was less sensitive to the toxicity of EDTA probably because of the salinity level in the media in which EDTA molecules formed complexes with sodium.
The obtained results showed that EDTA treatments during 24–72 h caused a significant decrease in the proportion of C. reinhardtii living cells (p < 0.05), which was dependent to the EDTA concentration and the time of exposure (Figure 5). The cellular mortality was by 23–32% under 10 mg L−1 of EDTA during 24–72 h. When algal cells were exposed to 100 mg L−1 of EDTA, the cellular mortality was by 66% at 24 h and reaching 100% at 48–72 h. This toxicity effect indicated that EDTA molecules were trapping essential elements causing a deficiency in nutrient uptake at the surface of algal cells, as it was previously suggested [30,39]. On the other hand, only 100 mg L−1 of EDTA induced a significant toxicity effect (p < 0.05) on the cellular viability of C. euryale (Figure 5). Under a salinity of 10 g L−1, the cellular mortality was of 30 and 52% at 48 and 72 h, respectively. Under a salinity of 32 g L−1, it was only of 7, 12, and 20% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. These results are in accordance with the change of growth rate, indicating that the increase of salinity level significantly reduced the toxicity effect of EDTA on algal cells.
Without EDTA treatments, the cellular viability of C. reinhardtii and C. euryale exposed during 24–72 h to Fe3O4-NPs did not significantly decrease (p < 0.05) in comparison to controls (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). It appeared that these Chlamydomonas species were more resistant to the toxic effects of Fe3O4-NPs than the previous studied green alga Chlorella vulgaris, and this was probably due to its cellular characteristics such as the cell size and morphology [16]. In this work, the authors showed that the cellular viability decreased by 45 and 60%, when algal cells of C. vulgaris were exposed during 72 h to 50 and 100 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs, respectively. Furthermore, the combined effect of EDTA and Fe3O4-NPs treatments did not cause a higher cellular mortality on C. reinhardtii and C. euryale during 24–72 h. Even under some conditions, the effect of EDTA was less strong under Fe3O4-NPs treatments, showing an antagonistic effect of this NP on EDTA toxicity (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). In particular, the inhibitory effect of EDTA on the cellular viability of C. reinhardtii was respectively lower compared to the control (no NPs) by 43%, 32%, 26% at 24, 48, and 72 h (p < 0.05), under 100 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs. Under a salinity of 10 g L−1, the inhibitory effect of EDTA on the cellular viability of C. euryale exposed to 100 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs was lower by 16% and 20% at 48 and 72 h, respectively (p < 0.05).
Without EDTA treatments, the cellular viability of C. reinhardtii and C. euryale was significantly affected (p < 0.05) only under 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs. For C. reinhardtii, this parameter decreased by 45 % at 72 h, and it slightly decreased (1–2%) for C. euryale at 48 and 72 h only under a salinity of 10 g L−1 (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Furthermore, the combination of EDTA and CuO-NPs treatments did not induce an additive effect on the cellular mortality of C. reinhardtii and C. euryale during 24–72 h. During 24–72 h, the toxicity effect of EDTA was counterbalanced by 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8).

3. Conclusions

The interaction effect of environmental factors (EDTA, oxide NPs and/or salinity-depending on the species) was investigated during 72 h on the growth and viability of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under freshwater condition, and Chlamydomonas euryale under saltwater conditions. Due to lower particles agglomeration and higher solubility, CuO-NPs were more toxic than Fe3O4-NPs in freshwater condition, especially at 72 h under high concentration (100 mg L−1). Even though the specific surface area of CuO-NPs was twice smaller than Fe3O4-NPs, it was important to notice that the toxicity of CuO-NPs was stronger than Fe3O4-NPs for similar mass-based concentration. Indeed, Fe3O4-NPs had larger agglomerates and a very low solubility. Furthermore, the effect of EDTA increased the solubility of NPs, and the salinity caused a decrease in their solubility. Our results on C. euryale showed that the increase in the salinity level caused the formation of larger NPs agglomerates, leading to a decrease in the toxicity impact on algal cells. The increase of agglomerates could induce a lower bioavailability of NPs to interact with algal cells, and most of these agglomerates would sediment. Therefore, Fe3O4-NPs and CuO-NPs would be less dangerous in marine environments compared to freshwater ones. Moreover, our results showed that EDTA treatments induced a cellular toxicity effect on both freshwater and saltwater Chlamydomonas species, indicating the property of EDTA to alter the nutrient uptake at the surface of algal cells. Toxicity testing during 72 h demonstrated that algal cells of C. euryale were more resistant to EDTA toxic effects than algal cells of C. reinhardtii. In addition, our results indicated that NPs treatments induced an antagonistic effect on EDTA toxicity, especially for CuO-NPs. The marine condition (salinity level of 32 g L−1) also caused a decrease in the toxicity of EDTA on algal cells. In this perspective, more studies need to be done on chronic toxicity testing of these stressors to determine the long-term impact on algal population. Although the contamination of EDTA and oxide NPs is not alarming at a very low concentration, recent data in situ are missing for both freshwater and marine environments. Nevertheless, the toxicity impact caused by the interaction effect of environmental factors (EDTA and salinity) should be considered in risk assessment for metallic NPs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Algal Strains and Culture

The freshwater alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CC-125) was provided by the Chlamydomonas Resource Center (The University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA), and the marine species Chlamydomonas euryale (UTEX 2274) was provided by the UTEX Culture Collection of Algae (The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA). Both strains were grown in modified high salt medium (HSM), aka Sueoka’s medium [40]: NH4Cl 500 μg mL−1; MgSO4∙7H2O 20 μg mL−1; CaCl2 10 μg mL−1; KH2PO4 740 μg mL−1; K2HPO4 1.44 mg mL−1; H3BO3 185.5 μg mL−1; MnCl2∙4H2O 415.4 μg mL−1; ZnCl2 3.3 μg mL−1; FeCl3∙6H2O 159.8 μg mL−1; Na2EDTA∙2H2O 300.0 μg mL−1; CoCl2∙6H2O 2.6 μg mL−1; Na2MoO4∙2H2O 7.3 μg mL−1; CuCl2∙2H2O 0.012 μg mL−1. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.1 using 1N NaOH. All media were sterilized either in autoclave or by filtration (0.22 μm). The marine strain C. euryale could not survive in freshwater HSM, thus the salinity level was adjusted by adding NaCl at 10 and 32 g L−1. The ionic strength of culture media was estimated using the software MINEQL+ [41]. Algal cultures were maintained continuously on a rotating shaker (80 rpm), under a light intensity of 100 ± 20 μmol of photons m−2 s−1, and a temperature of 23 ± 1 °C. Samples of algal cultures in their exponential growth phase were used for analysis.

4.2. Characterization of Nanoparticles

Fe3O4-NPs were purchased from MTI Corporation (Richmond, VA, USA), having a purity of 99.9%, a size of 20 nm, a spherical shape, and a specific surface area >60 m2/g. CuO-NPs were obtained from Aldrich (Cat. 544868; Darmstadt, Germany), having a size <50 nm, a spherical shape, and a specific surface area of 29 m2/g. Before the characterization, NPs were dispersed in solution using ultrasonication (probe 1/4″, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 30% of power during 2 min, and then suspensions were incubated during 1 h at room temperature.
The Zeta potential of NPs was measured with a ZetaPlus (BrookHaven Instrument Corp., Long Island, NY, USA), and the hydrodynamic size distribution using a Zetasizer Nano S90 (DLS, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). To determine the solubility of NPs, suspensions were incubated in HSM during 24 h, and then centrifuged at a speed of 12,000 g during 30 min (centrifuge J2-HC, JA-20 rotor, Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA). The supernatant was collected, and the Cu or Fe in the soluble fraction was quantified by optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, model 5100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Prior to this analysis, the supernatant was examined using a Zetasizer Nano S90 to verify that the sample was free of NPs.

4.3. Nanoparticles and EDTA Treatments

Culture of algal cells having an initial cell density of 500,000 cells mL−1 were exposed to 50 and 100 mg L−1 of CuO-NPs or Fe3O4-NPs during 72 h in a final volume of 20 mL of medium. Alga C. euryale was exposed to NPs under salinity conditions of 10 and 32 g L−1, and C. reinhardtii only in freshwater HSM. Under these conditions, the effect of EDTA was tested at 10 and 100 mg L−1. The EDTA stock solution was of 400 mg L−1, and the pH was adjusted to the pH of the medium, 7 for HSM and 8.1 for HSM with salinities of 10 and 32 g L−1. In this study, we used gravimetric units for CuO and Fe3O4 NPs characterization, since NPs had properties totally different from their bulk counterpart. Indeed, nanotoxicity testing studies still employed mass-based concentration in water quality standards to discriminate toxicological properties of NPs versus their dissolved ionic species [42].

4.4. Growth Rate and Cellular Viability

The change in the cell density was determined by using a Multisizer Z3 (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA), and the growth rate (GR) was calculated according to this formula: GR = (lnW72h − lnW0)/72 h, where W72h represents the cell density at 72 h, and W0 the initial cell density. Cellular viability was assessed using propidium iodide at 40 μM (as a cellular mortality marker) by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6, Becton, Dickinson & co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Results of cellular viability were presented as the proportion of living cells (in %).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in two testing series and in triplicate. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey post-hoc test was conducted using Origin Pro 9 (2016) Graphing and Analysis software. Significant differences between the controls and treatments were considered for p values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; methodology, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; software, E.C. and C.V.; validation, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; formal analysis, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; investigation, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; resources, D.D. and W.G.M.; data curation, D.D.; writing—original draft preparation, E.C. and D.D.; writing—review and editing, E.C., C.V., D.D. and W.G.M.; supervision, D.D. and W.G.M.; project administration, D.D. and W.G.M.; funding acquisition, D.D. and W.G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by Ressources Aquatiques Québec (RAQ-FQRNT, C3-301672), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, RGPIN 415572-2013), Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (FRQNT, 2014-NC-173484), Fondation de l’UQAM, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq—Brazil, process number 200368/2014-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the results are presented in the article. The raw data and calculation files are available from the corresponding author David Dewez.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the technical support of Hermine Betis as an undergraduate trainee student at the Université du Québec à Montréal. The authors wish to thank Philippe Juneau for providing access to the Multisizer Z3 (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) at his laboratory (Dept. Biological Sciences, UQAM).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pankhurst, Q.A.; Thanh, N.T.K.; Jones, S.K. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D 2009, 42, 224001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Panneerselvam, P.; Morad, N.; Tan, K.A. Magnetic nanoparticle (Fe3O4) impregnated onto tea waste for the removal of nickel (II) from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tang, W.W.; Zeng, G.M.; Gong, J.L. Impact of humic/fulvic acid on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using nanomaterials: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468-469, 1014–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, Y.; Keller, A.A. EDTA functionalized magnetic nanoparticle sorbents for cadmium and lead contaminated water treatment. Water Res. 2015, 80, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hwang, Y.; Park, H.S.; Jung, W.H. Thermal conductivity and lubrication characteristics of nanofluids. Cur. Appl. Phys. 2006, 6, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dastjerdi, R.; Montazer, M. A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: Focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids Surf. B 2010, 79, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gottschalk, F.; Nowack, B. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J. Environ. Monitor. 2011, 13, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klaine, S.J.; Alvarez, P.J.J.; Batley, G.E.; Fernandes, T.F.; Handy, R.D.; Lyon, D.Y.; Mahendra, S.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Lead, J.R. Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27, 1825–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, J.; Oberdörster, G.; Biswas, P. Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhatt, I.; Tripathi, B.N. Interaction of engineered nanoparticles with various components of the environment and possible strategies for their risk assessment. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vale, G.; Mehennaoui, K.; Cambier, S.; Libralato, G.; Jomini, S.; Domingos, R.F. Manufactured nanoparticles in the aquatic environment-biochemical responses on freshwater organisms: A critical overview. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 170, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baek, Y.W.; An, Y.J. Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb2O3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 1603–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aruoja, V.; Pokhrel, S.; Sihtmäe, M.; Mortimer, M.; Mädler, L.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2015, 2, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Zhao, J. Toxicity and internalization of CuO nanoparticles to prokaryotic alga Microcystis aeruginosa as affected by dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6532–6540. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aruoja, V.; Dubourguier, H.C.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barhoumi, L.; Dewez, D. Toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on green alga Chlorella vulgaris. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 647974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Melegari, S.P.; Perreault, F.; Matias, W.G. Evaluation of toxicity and oxidative stress induced by copper oxide nanoparticles in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 142–143, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, J.; Cao, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; White, J.; Xing, B. Interactions of CuO nanoparticles with the algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa: Adhesion, uptake, and toxicity. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saxena, P.; Sangela, V.; Harish. Toxicity evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticles and accumulation by microalgae Coelastrella terrestris. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2020, 27, 19650–19660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saxena, P.; Saharan, V.; Baroliya, P.K.; Gour, V.S.; Rai, M.K.; Harish. Mechanism of nanotoxicity in Chlorella vulgaris exposed to zinc and iron oxide. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hazeem, L.; Waheed, F.; Rashdan, S.; Bououdina, M.; Loïc, B.; Slomianny, C.; Boukherroub, R.; Elmeselmani, W. Effect of magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles on the growth and photosynthetic pigment content of Picochlorum sp. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 11728–11739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheloni, G.; Marti, E.; Slaveykova, V.I. Interactive effects of copper oxide nanoparticles and light to green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 170, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brul, S.; Coote, P. Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nowack, B.; VanBriesen, J.M. Chelating agents in the environment. In Biogeochemistry of Chelating Agents; Nowack, B., Van Briesen, J.M., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Evangelou, M.W.H.; Ebel, M.; Schaeffer, A. Chelate assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals from soil. Effect, mechanism, toxicity, and fate of chelating agents. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 989–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bucheli-Witschel, M.; Egli, T. Environmental fate and microbial degradation of aminopolycarboxylic acids. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 25, 69–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Reemtsma, T.; Weiss, S.; Mueller, J.; Petrovic, M.; Gonzalez, S.; Barcelo, D.; Ventura, F.; Knepper, T.P. Polar pollutants entry into the water cycle by municipal wastewater: A European perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5451–5458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ma, M.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Z. Accumulation, assimilation and growth inhibition of copper on freshwater alga (Scenedesmus subspicatus 86.81 SAG) in the presence of EDTA and fulvic acid. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 63, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mendes, L.; Zambotti-Villela, L.; Simas, C.; Colepicolo, P. Toxicological effects of metal-EDTA/NTA complex formation in a synthetic medium on the macroalga Gracilaria domingensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pascual, G.; Sano, D.; Sakamaki, T.; Nishimura, O. Effects of chemical interaction of nutrients and EDTA on metals toxicity to Pseudokirckneriella subcapitata. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 110966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hsu-Kim, H.; Lau, B.L.T. Precipitation and growth of zinc sulfide nanoparticles in the presence of thiol-containing natural organic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 7236–7241. [Google Scholar]
  32. Deonarine, A.; Lau, B.L.T.; Aiken, G.R.; Ryan, J.N.; Hsu-Kim, H. Effects of humic substances on precipitation and aggregation of zinc sulfide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3217–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kennedy, A.J.; Chappell, M.A.; Bednar, A.J.; Ryan, A.C.; Laird, J.G.; Stanley, J.K.; Steevens, A. Impact of organic carbon on the stability and toxicity of fresh and stored silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 10772–10780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hanikenne, M. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a eukaryotic photosynthetic model for studies of heavy metal homeostasis and tolerance. New Phytol. 2003, 159, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Harris, E.H. The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook: Introduction to Chlamydomonas and Its Laboratory Use, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; p. 444. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nowack, B. Environmental chemistry of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4009–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tardat-Henry, M.; Beaudry, J.P. Chimie Des Eaux., 2nd ed.; Le Griffon d’Argile: Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, L.F.; Habibul, N.; He, D.Q.; Li, W.W.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.Q. Copper release from copper nanoparticles in the presence of natural organic matter. Water Res. 2015, 68, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ward, T.J.; Rausina, G.A.; Stonebraker, P.M.; Robinson, W.E. Apparent toxicity resulting from the sequestering of nutrient trace metals during standard Selenastrum capricornutum toxicity tests. Aquat. Toxicol. 2002, 60, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sueoka, N.; Chiang, K.S.; Kates, J.R. Deoxyribonucleic acid replication in meiosis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Isotopic transfer experiments with a strain producing eight zoospores. J. Mol. Biol. 1967, 25, 44–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schecher, W.D.; McAvoy, D.C. MINEQL+: A Chemical Equilibrium Modeling System, Version 4.5 for Windows, User’s Manual, 2nd ed.; Environmental Research Software: Hallowel, ME, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hull, M.; Kennedy, A.J.; Detzel, C.; Vikesland, P.; Chappell, M.A. Moving beyond mass: The unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 10881–10882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Zeta potential values of NPs in HSM (no salt added), and under two salinity conditions (10 and 32 g L−1). NPs were also exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 mg L−1 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash) and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) For both NPs, the salinity significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the values of the zeta potential compared to the respective controls (no salt added), even in the presence of EDTA (determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test).
Figure 1. Zeta potential values of NPs in HSM (no salt added), and under two salinity conditions (10 and 32 g L−1). NPs were also exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 mg L−1 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash) and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) For both NPs, the salinity significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the values of the zeta potential compared to the respective controls (no salt added), even in the presence of EDTA (determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test).
Plants 10 02118 g001
Figure 2. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4 and CuO particle size in HSM (dots), and under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 (dash) and 32 g L−1 (line).
Figure 2. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4 and CuO particle size in HSM (dots), and under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 (dash) and 32 g L−1 (line).
Plants 10 02118 g002
Figure 3. Solubility of CuO-NPs (50 and 100 mg L−1) in HSM (no salt added), and under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. NPs were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) The EDTA effect on NPs significantly caused an increase (p < 0.05) in the concentration of free Cu compared to respective controls (no EDTA). Moreover, the same letters (a, b, or c) indicated a significant difference for p < 0.05 (determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test).
Figure 3. Solubility of CuO-NPs (50 and 100 mg L−1) in HSM (no salt added), and under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. NPs were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) The EDTA effect on NPs significantly caused an increase (p < 0.05) in the concentration of free Cu compared to respective controls (no EDTA). Moreover, the same letters (a, b, or c) indicated a significant difference for p < 0.05 (determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test).
Plants 10 02118 g003
Figure 4. Growth rate (h−1) of algal cells exposed during 72 h to 50 and 100 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs for C. reinhardtii in HSM, and C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Tested concentrations of EDTA: 0 mg L−1 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash) and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 4. Growth rate (h−1) of algal cells exposed during 72 h to 50 and 100 mg L−1 of Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs for C. reinhardtii in HSM, and C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Tested concentrations of EDTA: 0 mg L−1 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash) and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Plants 10 02118 g004
Figure 5. Living algal cells (%) at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to different concentrations of EDTA (0, 10 and 100 mg L−1) for C. reinhardtii in HSM, and C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 5. Living algal cells (%) at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to different concentrations of EDTA (0, 10 and 100 mg L−1) for C. reinhardtii in HSM, and C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Plants 10 02118 g005
Figure 6. Living algal cells (%) at 24 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 6. Living algal cells (%) at 24 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Plants 10 02118 g006
Figure 7. Living algal cells (%) at 48 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 7. Living algal cells (%) at 48 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Plants 10 02118 g007
Figure 8. Living algal cells (in %) at 72 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 8. Living algal cells (in %) at 72 h for the control and treated cells to 50 and 100 mg L−1 Fe3O4-NPs or CuO-NPs: C. reinhardtii in HSM; C. euryale in HSM under two salinity conditions, 10 g L−1 and 32 g L−1. Under these conditions, algal cells were exposed to EDTA concentrations: 0 (white), 10 mg L−1 (dash), and 100 mg L−1 (gray). (*) Significant differences between the controls and treatments (p < 0.05) were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test.
Plants 10 02118 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Canuel, E.; Vaz, C.; Matias, W.G.; Dewez, D. Interaction Effect of EDTA, Salinity, and Oxide Nanoparticles on Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas euryale. Plants 2021, 10, 2118. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102118

AMA Style

Canuel E, Vaz C, Matias WG, Dewez D. Interaction Effect of EDTA, Salinity, and Oxide Nanoparticles on Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas euryale. Plants. 2021; 10(10):2118. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Canuel, Emilie, Cleiton Vaz, William Gerson Matias, and David Dewez. 2021. "Interaction Effect of EDTA, Salinity, and Oxide Nanoparticles on Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas euryale" Plants 10, no. 10: 2118. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop