Next Article in Journal
Semantic Segmentation of Remote-Sensing Imagery Using Heterogeneous Big Data: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Potsdam and Cityscape Datasets
Next Article in Special Issue
Geoinformation Technologies in Support of Environmental Hazards Monitoring under Climate Change: An Extensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Patterns of Childhood Obesity Prevalence in Relation to Socioeconomic Factors across England
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment and Mapping of Spatio-Temporal Variations in Human Mortality-Related Parameters at European Scale

Assessing Quality of Life Inequalities. A Geographical Approach

Department of Geography, School of Environment, Geography and Applied Economics, Harokopio University, 17671 Athens, Greece
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(10), 600;
Received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 27 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 October 2020 / Published: 12 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GIS-Based Analysis for Quality of Life and Environmental Monitoring)
This study proposes an integrated methodology for evaluating and mapping quality of life (QoL) and the quality of a place as residence area, at local level. The QoL assessment was based on the development of composite criteria, using geographical variables that evaluate QoL, and geographic information systems. The composite criteria are related to the natural and the socioeconomic environment, the housing conditions, the infrastructure and services, and the cultural and recreational facilities. Each criterion was evaluated by a set of variables and each variable was weighted based on the residents’ preferences and the analytical hierarchy process. The criteria were also weighted and combined to assess overall QoL. The methodology was implemented in the Municipality of Katerini, Greece, and QoL mapping led to the zoning of the study area and the identification of areas with low and high QoL. The results revealed the highest level of overall QoL in three out of twenty-nine communities, which provide better housing conditions and access to public services and infrastructures, combining also qualitative natural environment, whereas five mountainous and remote communities scored the lowest level. Mapping QoL may support decision making strategies that target to improve human well-being, increase QoL levels and upgrade living conditions. View Full-Text
Keywords: quality of life; geographic information systems; analytical hierarchy process quality of life; geographic information systems; analytical hierarchy process
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Faka, A. Assessing Quality of Life Inequalities. A Geographical Approach. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 600.

AMA Style

Faka A. Assessing Quality of Life Inequalities. A Geographical Approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(10):600.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faka, Antigoni. 2020. "Assessing Quality of Life Inequalities. A Geographical Approach" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, no. 10: 600.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop