Assessing Spatial Information Themes in the Spatial Information Infrastructure for Participatory Urban Planning Monitoring: Indonesian Cities
1
GIS Technology Section, Dept. of Support Architecture at the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
2
Center for Spatial Data Management and Dissemination at Badan Informasi Geospasial, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia
3
Geoinformation Section, Dept of Urbanism at the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8(7), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8070305
Received: 22 May 2019 / Revised: 3 July 2019 / Accepted: 12 July 2019 / Published: 17 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Algorithms and Techniques in Urban Monitoring)
Abstract
Most urban planning monitoring activities were designed to monitor implementation of aggregated sectors from different initiatives into practical and measurable indicators. Today, cities utilize spatial information in monitoring and evaluating urban planning implementation for not only national or local goals but also for the 2030 Agenda of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Modern cities adopt Participatory Geographic Information System (PGIS) initiative for their urban planning monitoring. Cities provide spatial information and online tools for citizens to participate. However, the selection of spatial information services for participants is made from producers’ perception and often disregards requirements from the regulation, functionalities, and broader user’s perception. By providing appropriate spatial information, the quality of participatory urban monitoring can be improved. This study presents a method for selecting appropriate spatial information for urban planning monitoring. It considers regulation, urban planning, and spatial science theories, as well as citizens’ requirements, to support participatory urban planning monitoring as a way to ensure the success of providing near real-time urban information to planners and decision-makers. View Full-TextKeywords:
urban planning; participatory mapping; urban planning monitoring; spatial data infrastructure; spatial information infrastructure; citizens science
▼
Figures
Graphical abstract
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Indrajit, A.; Van Loenen, B.; Van Oosterom, P. Assessing Spatial Information Themes in the Spatial Information Infrastructure for Participatory Urban Planning Monitoring: Indonesian Cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 305.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Related Articles
Article Metrics
Comments
[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.
EISSN 2220-9964
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert