Next Article in Journal
Study on Spatial Equity of Greening in Historical and Cultural Cities Based on Multi-Source Spatial Data
Previous Article in Journal
Geological Disaster Risk Assessment Under Extreme Precipitation Conditions in the Ili River Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Size Facility Allocation Under Competition: A Model with Competitive Decay and Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Genetic Algorithm

1
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14(9), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090347
Submission received: 9 April 2025 / Revised: 5 June 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025

Abstract

In modern urban planning, the problem of bank location requires not only considering geographical factors but also integrating competitive elements to optimize resource allocation and enhance market competitiveness. This study addresses the multi-size bank location problem by incorporating competitive factors into the optimization process through a novel reinforcement learning-enhanced genetic algorithm (RL-GA) framework. Building upon an attraction-based model with competitive decay functions, we propose an innovative hybrid optimization approach that combines evolutionary computation with intelligent decision-making capabilities. The RL-GA framework employs Q-learning principles to adaptively select optimal genetic operators based on real-time population states and search progress, enabling meta-learning where the algorithm learns how to optimize rather than simply optimizing. Unlike traditional genetic algorithms with fixed operator probabilities, our approach dynamically adjusts its search strategy through an ε-greedy exploration mechanism and multi-objective reward functions. Experimental results demonstrate that the RL-GA achieves improvements in early-stage convergence speed while maintaining solution quality comparable to traditional methods. The algorithm exhibits enhanced convergence characteristics in the initial optimization phases and demonstrates consistent performance across multiple optimization trials. These findings provide evidence for the potential of intelligence-guided evolutionary computation in facility location optimization, offering moderate computational efficiency gains and adaptive strategic guidance for banking facility deployment in competitive environments.
Keywords: facility location problem; competitive decay; heuristic algorithm; enhanced genetic algorithm; multi-size bank facility location problem; competitive decay; heuristic algorithm; enhanced genetic algorithm; multi-size bank

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Su, C.; Liang, H. Multi-Size Facility Allocation Under Competition: A Model with Competitive Decay and Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Genetic Algorithm. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090347

AMA Style

Zhao Z, Wang S, Su C, Liang H. Multi-Size Facility Allocation Under Competition: A Model with Competitive Decay and Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Genetic Algorithm. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2025; 14(9):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Zixuan, Shaohua Wang, Cheng Su, and Haojian Liang. 2025. "Multi-Size Facility Allocation Under Competition: A Model with Competitive Decay and Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Genetic Algorithm" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 14, no. 9: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090347

APA Style

Zhao, Z., Wang, S., Su, C., & Liang, H. (2025). Multi-Size Facility Allocation Under Competition: A Model with Competitive Decay and Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Genetic Algorithm. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(9), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop