Next Article in Journal
Increasing Bioactive Compound Production in Lettuce by Application of Trichoderma sp. Strain STP8
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Multi-Omics Reveal Metabolic Reprogramming by Ketogenic Diet in Melanoma Xenografts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Dynamics and SLC25 Transporters in Neurodegeneration: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Mammalian Models for Mitochondria Research in CNS Disorders

by
Dubravka Svob Strac
1,*,
Vedrana Filic
1,
Ana Filosevic Vujnovic
2,
Ivana Vrhovac Madunic
3,
Josip Madunic
3,
Ana Cipak Gasparovic
1,
Ana Havelka Mestrovic
4 and
Rozi Andretic Waldowski
2
1
Ruđer Bošković Institute, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Faculty of Biotechnology and Drug Development, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
3
Division of Toxicology, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Psychology, Algebra Bernays University, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2026, 16(7), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16071072
Submission received: 25 May 2026 / Revised: 7 July 2026 / Accepted: 21 July 2026 / Published: 22 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondria and Central Nervous System Disorders: 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Mitochondrial dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. Animal models are essential for elucidating disease mechanisms and supporting the development of new therapeutic strategies. Among these models, non-mammalian organisms offer distinct advantages, including low cost, rapid life cycles, genetic tractability, and suitability for large-scale, high-throughput studies. Organisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Dictyostelium discoideum, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Danio rerio have substantially advanced the understanding of mitochondrial processes relevant to CNS pathology. Studies using these models have revealed conserved mechanisms involving mitophagy, mitochondrial quality control, respiratory function, bioenergetic signaling, and neurodegenerative pathways. Their strengths, including scalability, live imaging capacity, and efficient genetic manipulation, have accelerated disease modeling and therapeutic discovery. However, simplified physiology, evolutionary distance from humans, and the incomplete representation of complex CNS organization limit their translational relevance and often require validation in higher-order organisms. Nevertheless, integrating these models into CNS research, particularly alongside emerging technologies, provides a powerful strategy for linking fundamental mitochondrial biology with translational neuroscience. This review summarizes the use of non-mammalian models in neuroscience research, with an emphasis on mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders and their potential to support future therapeutic advances.

1. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in CNS Disorders

The central nervous system (CNS) has exceptionally high metabolic demands, making neurons highly dependent on proper mitochondrial integrity and function. Mitochondria are essential for neuronal survival and function because they regulate ATP production required for synaptic transmission, calcium homeostasis, redox balance, lipid metabolism, apoptotic signaling, and overall neuronal viability [1]. Mitochondrial quality control is also crucial for preserving cellular homeostasis. When mitochondrial membrane potential collapses, damaged organelles are selectively removed through mitophagy, a process required to maintain mitochondrial integrity and cellular function. Disruption of this pathway has been implicated in a wide range of pathological conditions [2]. Given these pivotal roles, mitochondrial dysfunction is increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of many CNS disorders, including both neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases [3]. Growing evidence indicates that mitochondrial dysfunction is not only a downstream consequence of disease but may also act as a primary driver of pathogenesis, by contributing to neuronal degeneration, synaptic dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. To date, more than 150–350 distinct diseases have been associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, including a wide range of CNS disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Huntington’s disease (HD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Leigh syndrome (LS), NARP (neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa) syndrome, and hereditary spastic paraplegia [4,5]. Primary mitochondrial diseases constitute a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders characterized by impaired mitochondrial function resulting from mutations in either mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or nuclear DNA (nDNA), which encode mitochondrial structural or functional components. These mutations disrupt key mitochondrial processes, including oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), mitochondrial dynamics, and protein import. A substantial proportion of genes implicated in neurodegenerative disorders are directly linked to mitochondrial pathways, underscoring the critical importance of mitochondrial integrity for neuronal survival and function [6,7,8]. In addition to primary mitochondrial disorders, many genetic and non-genetic diseases, including numerous CNS conditions, exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction as a secondary pathological feature. In these cases, mitochondrial impairment may arise from processes such as protein aggregation, intracellular calcium overload, and oxidative stress. CNS disorders are typically multifactorial, and mitochondrial dysfunction often represents a convergent mechanism that exacerbates disease progression [6,7,9]. This dysfunction is commonly characterized by impaired respiratory chain activity, excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), altered mitochondrial dynamics, and defective quality control mechanisms, such as mitophagy. These alterations contribute to neuronal damage and degeneration, even when mitochondrial dysfunction is not the primary etiological factor [6,7,9].

2. Animal Models in CNS Research

Neuroscience research relies extensively on animal models to advance our understanding of neural function, behavior, and the molecular mechanisms underlying neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. These models are critical for elucidating CNS disease pathogenesis and for supporting the development and preclinical evaluation of new therapeutic strategies. The selection of appropriate animal models is guided by practical and scientific considerations, including experimental throughput, reproductive capacity, developmental timeline, ease of maintenance, availability of genomic and transcriptomic resources, susceptibility to genetic manipulation, and similarity to the human nervous system [10]. Although rodents, particularly mice and rats, remain the most widely used models in neuroscience, comparative studies across species are essential for distinguishing conserved biological mechanisms from species-specific features [11]. Non-mammalian model organisms provide simplified systems for elucidating fundamental neurobiological processes. These models are especially valuable for studying complex mechanisms associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, which are often difficult, time-consuming, and costly to examine in mammalian systems. Importantly, non-mammalian organisms enable high-throughput hypothesis testing and are frequently used in early-stage investigations of disease pathways, biomarker discovery, and drug screening before validation in higher-order models [10,12]. Moreover, non-mammalian animal models align closely with ethical frameworks and the principles of the 3Rs in animal experimentation because they offer valuable alternatives to traditional mammalian models while reducing ethical concerns associated with the use of higher vertebrates [13]. They can substitute for mammalian species in early-stage mechanistic and neurodevelopmental studies (replacement), and their high reproductive output supports statistically robust experiments with fewer breeding animals and lower overall animal use (reduction). Refinement is supported through their simpler husbandry requirements, lower perceived capacity for suffering, and suitability for non-invasive imaging and high-throughput analyses. Zebrafish embryos, for example, are frequently not considered protected experimental animals before reaching independent feeding stages, supporting their ethical utility.

3. Non-Mammalian Models to Study Mitochondrial Dysfunction in CNS

A key advantage of non-mammalian models for studying mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders is the strong evolutionary conservation of mitochondrial genes and pathways between these organisms and humans. This conservation enables investigation of essential processes such as OXPHOS, mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy, mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt), and redox signaling, thereby providing translational insights into human disease [14]. Species such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Dictyostelium discoideum, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Danio rerio have proven invaluable in elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS diseases. The following sections provide an overview of these non-mammalian models and their applications in neuroscience research, with a particular emphasis on mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders.

3.1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a single-cell eukaryote, is widely used in molecular biology and biochemistry. Yeast shares several practical advantages with bacteria, including rapid division, a well-characterized and relatively simple genome (approximately 6000 genes), straightforward genetic manipulation and suitability for large-scale experiments [15]. At the same time, as a eukaryote, yeast provides an excellent system for studying post-translational modifications and protein folding. In addition, deletion-mutant collections containing more than 4800 gene deletions are available [16] and nearly half of the essential yeast genes can be replaced by human homologs [17]. The yeast mitochondrial genome is a circular DNA ranging from approximately 78,000 bp in shorter genomes to 85,000 bp in longer genomes, mainly because of strain-specific variation in intron and non-coding-region length [18]. Yeast mtDNA can also undergo massive deletions (ρ- mutants), or complete loss (ρ0 mutants), resulting in “petite” phenotype characterized by tiny colonies on agar plates [19]. This combination of features makes yeast a valuable model for studying the metabolic and signaling pathways involved in eukaryotic diseases while retaining many advantages of bacterial systems, such as high-throughput capacity, genetic tractability, and experimental efficiency. Yeast cultivation is also substantially less expensive than that of mammalian cell culture, providing a cost-effective yet powerful system for investigating fundamental cellular processes. However, yeast has important limitations, particularly for studies of cell–cell interactions, tissue organization, or organ-related physiology, which cannot be replicated in this unicellular system.
The advantages of yeast as a model organism in biological and biochemical research have driven the development of yeast-based systems for studying neurodegenerative disorders. Its ease of genetic manipulation, short life cycle, conservation of fundamental eukaryotic cellular pathways, and the presence of endogenous amyloid and prions [20], enabled the establishment of the first yeast model of HD [21]. Since then, several HD yeast models have been developed and successfully used as high-throughput platforms for screening potential therapeutic compounds [22,23]. In addition, a yeast model expressing huntingtin fragments containing flanking polyglutamine (polyQ) regions has been established to investigate huntingtin protein aggregation, providing insights into the mechanisms governing the transition between benign and toxic protein conformations [24]. ALS is another neurodegenerative disorder for which several yeast models have been developed [25]. Although ALS pathology is complex, most patients exhibit defects in fundamental cellular processes, including dysregulated RNA metabolism and protein folding, making yeast an effective system for investigating these pathways and the functional consequences of disease-associated mutations [25]. However, because yeast lacks an immune system, inflammation mechanisms contributing to ALS pathology cannot be modeled in this system. Similarly, yeast models have been developed for PD, which is characterized by the intracellular aggregation of α-synuclein, despite the absence of a yeast ortholog of α-synuclein. These models are generated by expressing α-synuclein fused to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of an inducible promoter, allowing protein expression to be switched on or off by changing the growth medium from glucose to galactose [26]. Considering the evolutionary origin of mitochondria, it is not surprising that yeast and humans share approximately 70% of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, many of which are implicated in mitochondrial disorders [27]. Consequently, essential mitochondrial processes including mitochondrial import, mitochondrial dynamics, quality control, and mitochondria-derived signaling are highly conserved across these species [28]. One of the key advantages of yeast is its ability to survive without functional OXPHOS due to its capacity for fermentation [29,30], enabling the analysis of otherwise lethal mutations and deletions in essential mitochondrial genes [31].
In PD, for example, two mitochondrial Hsp70 variants, P509S and R126W, have been shown to contribute to disease susceptibility [32]. In yeast models, these variants exhibited increased aggregation resulting from reduced protein stability or enhanced interactions with J-proteins, thereby recapitulating the cellular defects observed in PD patients [32]. Yeast models have also provided valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying ALS. The first gene linked to ALS was SOD1, which encodes copper/zinc superoxide dismutase. Although more than 200 SOD1 mutations have been identified in ALS patients, yeast strains expressing human SOD1 in place of the endogenous yeast ortholog demonstrated that all these mutant variants remain functional [33]. Furthermore, these models revealed that ALS-associated SOD1 mutants preferentially aggregate near mitochondria due to factors such as reduced acetylation of Lys 123 or modifications of His47, His49, His64, His72, His81, and His121, which compromise protein stability and conformation, thereby promoting aggregation [34]. In studies of LS, yeast has served as a valuable model for validating mitochondrial defects associated with the disease. For example, yeast-based assays confirmed the pathogenicity of two novel OPA1 mutations identified in patients with early-onset LS [35], as well as a splice variant in the ATP5PO gene associated with the syndrome [36]. Interestingly, certain point mutations are shared among multiple CNS-related mitochondrial diseases. One notable example is MT-ATP6 gene (yeast ortholog: ATP6), in which mutations have been associated with ataxia, NARP and maternally inherited LS (MILS) [37,38]. MT-ATP6 point mutations severely impair ATP synthase function, and yeast models have demonstrated that these defects also reduce the levels of Complex IV, closely recapitulating the mitochondrial disfunction observed in affected patients [37,39,40]. In addition to neurodegenerative diseases, yeast is an exceptionally valuable system for studying primary mitochondrial disorders, particularly mitochondrial maintenance disorders such as progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO). The molecular basis of PEO is linked to mutations in the DNA polymerase γ catalytic subunit encoded by POLG [41]. The yeast ortholog Mip1, together with the ability of yeast to survive the complete loss of mtDNA through petite colony formation, provides an exceptionally attractive system for investigating the functional consequences of DNA polymerase γ mutations [41]. Overall, S. cerevisiae is an affordable and powerful model for investigating the molecular mechanisms of CNS mitochondria-related disorders due to its easy genetic manipulation, evolutionary conserved pathways, the ability to tolerate mitochondrial dysfunction, suitability for studying pathogenic processes, identifying therapeutic targets and high-throughput screening for candidate therapeutics (Table 1).

3.2. Dictyostelium discoideum

Another simple yet valuable model in mitochondrial research related to human CNS disorders is the protist Dictyostelium discoideum. This amoeba naturally lives in soil, feeds by phagocytosing bacteria, and grows through mitotic division. Laboratory strains possess mutations that strongly upregulate fluid uptake, enabling axenic growth in liquid culture medium. D. discoideum is remarkable because, under unfavorable conditions, it transitions from isolated vegetative cells to multicellular development and produces spores. Its nuclear [42] and mitochondrial [43] genomes have been fully sequenced. Vegetative D. discoideum cells are haploid and contain six chromosomes encoding approximately 12,500 genes [42]. Molecular tools for gene editing by homologous recombination [44] or CRISPR/Cas [45] are readily available, and protocols for standard molecular biology techniques, cellular assays, and cell imaging are well established. Together with its unicellular and multicellular lifestyles, these features make D. discoideum an attractive model for studying cell motility, endocytosis, cytokinesis, adhesion, multicellularity, social behavior, and human diseases [46]. D. discoideum emerged from the animal-fungal lineage after the split between plants and animals but before the fungal lineages diverged from animals [42,47]. Nevertheless, many of its proteins are more similar to human proteins than those from S. cerevisiae, and it contains numerous genes orthologous to human disease-related genes [42,48]. This has led the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States to recognize Dictyostelium as an important non-mammalian biomedical model [49]. As a model for human pathology, D. discoideum has been used to study bacterial infections [50], amoeboid migration relevant to immune and cancer cells [51,52], extracellular vesicles in intercellular communication, drug delivery and detoxification [53], endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress responses [54], autophagy [55], cancer [56], mitochondrial disorders [57], and neurological diseases [58].
The D. discoideum mitochondrial genome is a 55.6 kb circular DNA molecule comprising 61 genes, making it substantially larger than the highly reduced human mitochondrial genome, which is approximately 16.6 kb and contains 37 genes [43,59]. All genes are located on the same DNA strand and share a common transcriptional orientation, primarily encoding proteins and RNAs required for respiration and translation. To study mitochondrial disorders in D. discoideum, several approaches have been developed to induce sublethal inhibition of the expression of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins, or mitochondrial genes encoding proteins required for mitochondrial protein translation, respiratory chain function, and OXPHOS. These approaches include the knockout of nuclear genes encoding non-essential mitochondrial proteins, RNA interference or antisense inhibition of mitochondrial proteins, and ethidium bromide treatment to deplete cells of mtDNA [60]. Because each D. discoideum cell contains approximately 200 copies of the mitochondrial genome, a strategy has also been developed to mimic heteroplasmy observed in human mitochondrial diseases [61]. This approach relies on homologous recombination between mtDNA and a plasmid vector carrying a 500–1000 bp fragment of the targeted gene. However, a limitation of this method is the potential for off-target incorporation into the nuclear genome, which must be considered when interpreting the transformant phenotypes. Whereas the relationship between genetic mutations and phenotype is often complex and poorly understood in human mitochondrial diseases, D. discoideum, provides a genetically tractable system for reproducible phenotypic analysis of mitochondrial disease states because it has a haploid genome and displays numerous phenotypes throughout its short life cycle. In addition, a method for measuring mitochondrial respiratory function in D. discoideum has been established [62]. Phenotypes associated with OXPHOS-related mitochondrial dysfunction in D. discoideum include impaired growth in liquid culture medium and on bacterial lawns without effects on macropinocytosis or phagocytosis; impaired cell aggregation during the transition to multicellular development; defective phototaxis and thermotaxis during the multicellular slug stage; and disturbed cell differentiation during multicellular development, with an increased number of stalk cells [60]. These phenotypes have been observed in most mitochondrially diseased cells, regardless of the underlying mutation [63,64,65]. Based on phototaxis- and thermotaxis-deficient mitochondrial mutants, Dictyostelium researchers were the first to propose that defective mitochondria affect cellular signaling [63]. It was later shown that the phenotypes of mitochondrially diseased D. discoideum cells are induced by constitutively active AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a sensor of cellular energy levels, rather than by decreased ATP levels or reduced mitochondrial mass [66,67,68]. Chronic AMPK activation has also been demonstrated in neurons of patients with PD, AD, and HD [69].
D. discoideum has been used as a model for both primary mitochondrial diseases and diseases of non-mitochondrial origin that affect mitochondrial function [57]. For example, D. discoideum has been utilized as the first NDUFAF5 model to study LS, since it contains a highly similar protein, crucial for the function of complex I of the electron transport chain [70,71,72,73,74]. The ndufaf5 null cells showed a significant reduction in complex I respiratory activity, a marked growth defect, defective slug phototaxis and delayed development, resulting in non-viable spores. In contrast to other mitochondrially diseased cells, the phenotypes of ndufaf5 null cells are not caused by increased AMPK activity. Nevertheless, bulk autophagy was increased, representing the first evidence linking autophagy to complex I defects [74]. An example of a non-mitochondrial disease that affects mitochondrial function and has been investigated using D. discoideum is PD, with 5–10% of cases being hereditary due to mutations in PARK genes [75,76]. Mutations in DJ-1 (PARK7), LRRK2 (PARK8), and HTRA2 (PARK13) have been modeled in D. discoideum [77,78,79] (Table 2). Although loss-of-function mutations in DJ-1 cause mitochondrial dysfunction, a major contributor to PD pathogenesis [76,80], studies in D. discoideum, which contains a single DJ-1 homolog encoded by the deeJ gene, have demonstrated a non-mitochondrial role for DJ-1 in unstressed cells as a positive regulator of phagocytosis and growth on bacterial lawns [81]. Interestingly, DJ-1 knockdown does not impair mitochondrial function but instead increases mitochondrial respiration, and the overall phenotype does not mimic typical mitochondrial dysfunction [81]. Under oxidative stress, however, these cells exhibit AMPK-dependent phenotypes characteristic of mitochondrial disease, indicating that DJ-1 protects cells from AMPK hyperactivation during oxidative stress [77]. Alternatively, D. discoideum can be used to investigate the functions of human disease-related proteins that lack homologs in this organism. For example, the cytotoxicity of human neurodegeneration-associated proteins tau and α-synuclein has been examined in naïve D. discoideum cells [82]. Additional examples of mitochondrial dysfunctions associated with neurological disorders studied in D. discoideum are also listed in Table 2.

3.3. Caenorhabditis elegans

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is a small, transparent metazoan that has emerged as a fundamental model for neurobiology and disease research [89]. It was the first organism to have its entire synaptic connectome reconstructed [90,91], enabling single-cell and synapse-level analysis of neural circuits. Despite this simplicity, its nervous system exhibits architectural features such as small-world topology, modular organization, and hub “rich-club” connectivity, a network property in which highly connected hub neurons are preferentially interconnected and act as central communication nodes linking distinct neuronal modules. In addition, C. elegans possesses an extensive “wireless” signaling architecture based on neuropeptide–receptor interactions that resembles signaling systems found in mammalian brains [92,93,94,95]. The organism’s transparency facilitates real-time imaging of mitochondrial dynamics, synaptic transmission, and protein aggregation within an intact multicellular context [96,97,98,99,100]. C. elegans genome is fully sequenced, and approximately 40–80% of human genes, including 40–50% of disease-associated genes, have orthologs in C. elegans. Many of these genes are involved in lipid metabolism and insulin/IGF-1, AMPK, and mTOR signaling [101,102,103,104]. This high degree of conservation, together with advanced molecular tools including RNA interference, CRISPR/Cas editing, and transgenics [105,106,107], enables high-throughput genetic and pharmacological screening. The genome encodes more than 150 neuropeptide precursors and a similar number of peptide-activated G protein-coupled receptors [108,109], reflecting remarkable biochemical diversity and molecular conservation with humans. The nematode develops rapidly, progressing from embryo to adult in only three days. Combined with the complexity of a multicellular organism, this feature makes it ideal for studying cellular differentiation, development, apoptosis, autophagy, and mitochondrial quality control [110,111,112]. Its short life cycle, small body size, and low maintenance cost make C. elegans a versatile and powerful system for investigating aging, metabolism, stress responses, reproductive biology, host–microbiome interactions, and toxicology [113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120]. Behavioral outputs such as locomotion, chemotaxis, learning, and mechanosensation provide robust functional readouts of neuronal integrity and connectivity, making C. elegans an indispensable model for linking molecular perturbations to organismal phenotypes associated with CNS disorders [121,122]. Transgenic strains expressing human neurodegeneration-associated proteins, including α-synuclein (PD) [123,124], amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau (AD), polyglutamine (HD), and mutant SOD1 or TDP-43 (ALS) [125], have been used to identify genetic and pharmacological factors that alleviate neuronal loss, many of which exert their effects on mitochondrial homeostasis, autophagy, and proteostatic regulation [126,127].
C. elegans also provides a uniquely powerful in vivo system for investigating mitochondrial biology [128]. Mitochondrial dynamics in C. elegans are tightly regulated by FZO-1, EAT-3 and DRP-1, the orthologs of mammalian mitofusins (MFN1/2), OPA1, and human DNM1L/Drp1, respectively [129]. Disruption of these genes results in fragmented or hyperfused mitochondrial networks, impaired ATP production, and neurobehavioral deficits, highlighting their critical roles in maintaining neuronal homeostasis [130]. Disturbances in mitochondrial dynamics often signal selective organelle degradation through mitophagy, which is regulated by the kinase PINK-1 and the ubiquitin ligase PDR-1, functional orthologs of human PINK1 and Parkin [131]. Loss of PINK-1 or PDR-1 causes accumulation of depolarized mitochondria, elevated oxidative stress, and dopaminergic neurodegeneration, closely resembling PD pathology [132]. Another conserved pathway investigated in C. elegans is UPRmt, a stress-response pathway that “detects” mitochondrial dysfunction and activates the nuclear transcriptional factor ATFS-1, leading to the upregulation of chaperones HSP-6 and HSP-60, to restore mitochondrial function [133,134]. C. elegans has also been widely used to investigate surveillance systems that integrate mitochondrial function with cellular metabolism and longevity pathways, including AMPK, sirtuins, and insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS) [135,136,137]. Moreover, C. elegans is highly sensitive to mitochondrial toxins, including rotenone, paraquat, and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+), making it a well-established model for exploring how environmental and chemical insults cause mitochondrial stress and neuronal damage [138]. Table 3 summarizes representative C. elegans models of CNS diseases and primary mitochondrial disorders, highlighting the corresponding genetic or transgenic manipulations and the key phenotypes observed in each model.
In C. elegans models of PD, expression of human α-synuclein in dopaminergic neurons or mutations in the PINK-1 and Parkin orthologs (pdr-1) cause progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration accompanied by mitochondrial fragmentation, impaired respiration, and excessive ROS production [112,139], mirroring mitochondrial pathology in human PD. In AD models, neuronal expression of human Aβ or tau leads to mitochondrial fragmentation, reduced ATP synthesis, increased oxidative stress, and disrupted calcium homeostasis [140], contributing to synaptic failure and neuronal dysfunction and resembling early AD pathology. Activation of UPRmt and upregulation of mitochondrial chaperones such as HSP-6 and HSP-60 mitigate these phenotypes by restoring energy metabolism and reducing oxidative damage [141,142]. In C. elegans models of HD, polyQ expanded fragments of the human huntingtin protein cause mitochondrial dysfunction characterized by an altered fission–fusion balance, impaired respiratory capacity, and elevated ROS levels in GABAergic and cholinergic neurons [143,144,145]. These defects recapitulate HD-related mitochondrial pathology and correlate with behavioral and locomotor impairments. In ALS, C. elegans models expressing mutant SOD1, TDP-43, or FUS demonstrate impaired mitochondrial transport along axons, accumulation of oxidatively damaged mitochondria, and defective mitophagy, resulting in motor neuron degeneration [125,146]. Together, these models closely parallel mitochondrial dysfunction observed in human neurodegenerative disorders and enable high-throughput screening of compounds with neuroprotective potential. Beyond well-studied neurodegenerative diseases, C. elegans has also been widely used to model primary mitochondrial diseases affecting the CNS. Nematode homologs of genes implicated in human LS and Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA) recapitulate key pathological features, including impaired electron transport chain activity, defective iron–sulfur cluster assembly, and oxidative stress-driven neuronal degeneration [147,148]. In addition, C. elegans has provided valuable insights into mtDNA maintenance disorders through models targeting polg-1, the nematode ortholog of the human POLG gene. Deficiency or mutation of polg-1 disrupts mitochondrial genome maintenance, resulting in mtDNA depletion or the accumulation of mtDNA mutations, impaired mitochondrial function, shortened lifespan, sterility, and widespread physiological dysfunction. These models are relevant to POLG-related primary mitochondrial disorders, which in humans commonly present with encephalopathy, ataxia, neuropathy, epilepsy, and progressive external ophthalmoplegia [149,150,151].

3.4. Drosophila melanogaster

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful model organism in both fundamental and applied biomedical research [152,153,154]. Its short life cycle, high reproductive rate, and ease of genetic manipulation, supported by a fully sequenced genome, make it well suited for diverse laboratory studies. Advanced genetic tools, including the GAL4/UAS binary expression system [155], CRISPR/Cas genome editing [156], and RNA interference [157], further expand its experimental applications. Because approximately 75% of human disease-associated genes have homologs in Drosophila, the model has substantial translational value for investigating complex biological processes [158]. Beyond genetics, flies are also widely used in behavioral research, ranging from relatively simple traits such as locomotor activity [159] to more complex phenomena including sleep [160,161,162], aggression [163,164], and addiction [165,166,167]. These features position Drosophila as a model for dissecting the molecular, cellular, and behavioral mechanisms underlying human diseases. The Drosophila CNS contains approximately 135,000 neurons that form well-defined circuits [168]. Despite its relative simplicity compared to mammalian brains, it exhibits conserved neuronal architecture and neurotransmitter systems, including dopaminergic, serotonergic, and cholinergic networks that are also present in mammals [169,170], enhancing its translational relevance. The fruit fly has been used to study neurodevelopment, from establishing neuronal identity [171] and axon guidance [172,173], to synapse formation [174,175] and plasticity [176,177,178]. A wide range of genetic tools, such as the split-GAL4 lines, thermogenetics, and optogenetics, allows precise manipulation of specific neuronal populations [179]. In parallel, imaging approaches such as calcium- and voltage-sensitive reporters enable real-time monitoring of neuronal activity in intact, behaving flies [180,181,182]. Because of these advantages, Drosophila has been used to investigate synaptic transmission, molecular mechanisms of behavior, and conserved signaling pathways. Importantly, transgenic fly models mimicking human neurodegenerative disorders, including AD [183,184], PD [185], and HD [186], have enabled investigation of pathogenic mechanisms such as protein aggregation, impaired synaptic function, and neuronal loss. These studies deepen understanding of CNS biology and support preclinical testing of therapeutic strategies.
A major contribution of Drosophila to mitochondrial research lies in studies of mitochondrial dynamics, including fission, fusion, biogenesis, and transport [187,188]. Core regulators of these processes, such as Opa1, Mitofusin/Marf, and Drp1, are conserved in the fly, and genetic manipulation of these proteins has revealed their roles in maintaining mitochondrial morphology, distribution, and functional integrity [185,189,190]. Studies in Drosophila have shown that imbalances in fission and fusion cause profound defects in neuronal survival, muscle function, and lifespan, establishing direct links between mitochondrial dynamics and organismal health [191,192]. Respiratory chain deficiencies generated through targeted genetic mutations in Drosophila have revealed how impaired OXPHOS leads to reduced ATP production, increased ROS generation, and subsequent cellular damage [193,194,195]. These models have proven valuable for studying mitochondrial contributions to aging and for identifying antioxidant pathways that counteract oxidative stress [196]. The fly has also been used to study mitochondrial–nuclear communication, revealing how mitochondrial dysfunction triggers transcriptional reprogramming and systemic responses. For example, mitochondrial stress in Drosophila activates the UPRmt and alters metabolic and stress-resistance pathways, providing insight into how mitochondrial signaling integrates with organismal physiology [197,198]. Drosophila melanogaster is also widely used to study primary mitochondrial diseases. Many fly genes are highly conserved with their human orthologs, allowing researchers to model defects in OXPHOS, mtDNA maintenance, mitochondrial translation, and mitochondrial dynamics [199]. Drosophila has emerged as a valuable model for POLG-associated mitochondrial maintenance disorders. Mutations in the fly POLG ortholog, tamas (tam), lead to mtDNA depletion, accumulation of mitochondrial genome mutations, respiratory-chain dysfunction, locomotor impairment, and reduced lifespan, recapitulating key features of human POLG-related diseases such as Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome and PEO [200,201,202].
Another area in which Drosophila has been highly informative is the study of mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders. The discovery of Pink1 and Parkin pathways in Drosophila provided a mechanistic basis for mitophagy, the selective degradation of damaged mitochondria [185,189]. Loss-of-function mutations in Pink1 or Parkin led to mitochondrial fragmentation, disrupted respiratory chain function, and dopaminergic neuronal degeneration, closely recapitulating features of PD [190,195]. These findings clarified conserved mechanisms of mitochondrial maintenance and highlighted Drosophila as a valuable model for mitochondrial research in neurodegeneration [197]. Similarly, Drosophila models of AD (expressing Aβ or tau) and HD (expressing mutant huntingtin) have demonstrated mitochondrial abnormalities, including disrupted dynamics, reduced ATP production, oxidative stress, and defective axonal transport [203,204,205,206]. These models show how mitochondrial impairment contributes to synaptic dysfunction, neuronal loss, and progressive behavioral decline. In addition to classical neurodegenerative disorders, Drosophila has emerged as a valuable model for psychiatric conditions, including addiction and schizophrenia [207,208,209], in which mitochondrial dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a contributing factor. Repeated exposure to ethanol or psychostimulants in flies alters mitochondrial dynamics and energy metabolism in dopaminergic circuits, mirroring findings in mammalian models. Mitochondrial dysfunction in these neurons disrupts dopamine release, reward processing, and behavioral plasticity, thereby contributing to addictive phenotypes. Moreover, Drosophila provides a powerful high-throughput platform to study how genetic manipulation of mitochondrial regulators (e.g., Drp1, Marf, Pink1) modulates drug sensitivity, tolerance, and withdrawal behaviors [210]. Table 4 summarizes key findings from D. melanogaster models linking CNS disorders to mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting major genes, pathways, and phenotypes, and underscoring Drosophila as a powerful model for studying mitochondrial contributions to neuronal dysfunction, synaptic plasticity, and disease.

3.5. Danio rerio

Zebrafish (Danio rerio), a small tropical teleost belonging to the Cyprinidae family, has emerged as one of the most versatile vertebrate models for biomedical research [220]. Embryos develop major organs and a functional CNS within 72 h post-fertilization, while adults reach sexual maturity in approximately 12 weeks, producing hundreds of offspring weekly [221,222]. The zebrafish brain shares strong structural and functional homology with mammals, displaying conserved dopaminergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic neurotransmitter systems [223]. At the genetic level, zebrafish share at least one ortholog with more than 70% of human genes, including numerous loci implicated in neurological and mitochondrial disorders [224]. Genetic manipulation is straightforward through microinjection and a broad range of genome-editing tools [225,226], which have generated libraries of mutant and reporter lines, facilitating detailed tracking of developmental and disease processes at subcellular resolution [227]. Additional advantages of zebrafish include high fertility, external fertilization, optical transparency during embryonic and larval stages, rapid development, a fully sequenced diploid genome, and excellent genetic and pharmacological tractability [220,226,227]. Zebrafish have emerged as a cost-effective and high-throughput vertebrate platform for modeling neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders [228]. They recapitulate key behavioral and neurochemical features observed in rodents and humans, including motor control, cognition, and anxiety-related behaviors. Moreover, many human genes linked to neurodegeneration, such as SNCA, PINK1, Parkin, and LRRK2 in PD; PSEN1 and PSEN2 in AD; and SOD1, TARDBP, C9orf72, and FUS in ALS, have functional zebrafish orthologs [224,227,229]. Robust chemical and genetic zebrafish models of PD are well established. Exposure to neurotoxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) induces dopaminergic neuron loss, mimicking mammalian PD pathology [229]. Likewise, mutations in mitochondrial-associated PD genes (pink1, parkin, DJ-1, LRRK2) reproduce dopaminergic neurodegeneration and motor deficits, enabling mechanistic studies and therapeutic screening [230,231]. In ALS research, mutant sod1 zebrafish display motor-neuron degeneration, neuromuscular-junction (NMJ) disorganization, and mitochondrial abnormalities [232], whereas C9orf72 loss-of-function models exhibit defective synaptic vesicle release, cytoplasmic TDP-43 accumulation, and locomotor deficits [233]. AD-like phenotypes are generated through either toxin exposure or targeted genetic modifications [234]. Synthetic Aβ42 injection into zebrafish embryos induces cognitive impairment by day 5 post-fertilization, while okadaic acid or acrylamide trigger tau hyperphosphorylation and neuronal loss [235,236]. Insertion of the human mutant APPswe gene leads to Aβ accumulation, neuronal death, and enlarged perivascular spaces, recapitulating features of human AD pathology [237]. A fluorescent Tau-P301L transgenic line enables real-time visualization of tau aggregation, axonal degeneration, and cell death in live zebrafish, providing a platform for therapeutic screening [238]. Additionally, non-invasive imaging approaches, including functional MRI, micro-CT, calcium imaging, and electroencephalography, allow monitoring of neuronal activity and network dysfunction [239,240]. Chronic-stress paradigms and exposure to psychedelics, such as LSD and psilocybin, induce anxiolytic and neuroplastic responses, expanding the utility of zebrafish to psychiatric and stress-related research [241].
Because zebrafish neurons are energy-intensive and optically accessible, they are well suited for studying mitochondrial dynamics, biogenesis, and disease mechanisms in vivo [226,242]. The zebrafish and human mitochondrial genomes share approximately 65% sequence identity, identical gene order, and similar codon usage, supporting cross-species translation of results [243]. A broad range of genetic toolkits [242] and reporters, including Mitotimer, MitoFish, and fluorescent chemical probes such as MitoSOX and rhodamine dyes, enables systematic interrogation of mitochondrial physiology and real-time visualization of mitochondrial turnover, redox status, and membrane potential [244,245,246,247]. Using these approaches, zebrafish researchers have mapped ATP:ADP ratios, calcium fluxes between cytoplasm and mitochondria, and ROS dynamics under both physiological and stress conditions [248,249]. Live imaging of the zebrafish posterior lateral-line and motor neurons revealed that retrograde mitochondrial transport is essential for maintaining healthy organelle distribution, because disruption of the dynactin component actr10 arrests retrograde trafficking and leads to distal mitochondrial accumulation [250,251]. Mutant zebrafish lines targeting key mitochondrial genes replicate several human mitochondrial diseases. For example, zebrafish polg mutants model mitochondrial maintenance disorders by disrupting mtDNA replication and repair. TALEN-generated polg/ zebrafish exhibit severe mtDNA depletion, impaired mitochondrial respiration, growth abnormalities, and reduced regenerative capacity [252]. Additional polg models generated using antisense, ENU, and CRISPR approaches reproduce mitochondrial dysfunction and tissue-specific phenotypes, supporting studies of POLG pathogenesis and therapies [253,254]. In addition, zebrafish models of multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD) link mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction to neural defects, highlighting their relevance for studying CNS disorders caused by impaired bioenergetics [249]. As in humans, Ndufb7 mutations in zebrafish cause lactic acidosis, brain malformation, and neuronal volume loss [255], whereas knockdown of tfam, opa1, surf1, mfn2, and slc25a1 results in severe developmental abnormalities affecting the eye, heart, and brain, recapitulating features of human syndromes, including LS and MELAS (mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) [229]. Furthermore, mutations in mfn2, slc25a1, kbp, kif1b, and actr10 mirror human Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT), producing defective mitochondrial transport and NMJ abnormalities [256,257,258]. These examples highlight zebrafish as valuable models for studying both primary mitochondrial diseases and secondary mitochondrial dysfunction in neurological disorders (Table 5).
Bestman et al. [259] used 2,4-dinitrophenol, an OXPHOS uncoupler, during early development to establish a zebrafish model of mitochondrial disease characterized by ATP depletion, developmental arrest, and motor-neuron and retinal abnormalities. Likewise, Pinho et al. [260] demonstrated that inhibition of the electron transport chain induces developmental and cardiovascular defects, further supporting the utility of zebrafish as a platform for studying mitochondrial pathophysiology and screening mitochondria-targeted therapeutics. Mitochondrial toxicology studies further underscore the sensitivity of zebrafish to environmental and pharmacological insults. Exposure to toxins such as chloroaniline or triphenyltin acetate [261], methylmercury [262], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, arsenic, cadmium, and dioxins [263,264], as well as microcystin-LR [265], titanium dioxide and graphene oxide [266], and tramadol [267], induces mtDNA damage and oxidative stress, disrupts mitochondrial function and morphology, and provokes apoptosis. New fluorescent probes such as ZMJ214 have enabled real-time visualization of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization [268], whereas DdCBE (DddA-derived cytosine base editor)–mediated mtDNA editing in zebrafish has enabled direct modeling of mitochondrial-genome mutations affecting the CNS [269]. Furthermore, Arribat et al. [270] defined mitochondria-dependent developmental checkpoints and demonstrated that mitochondrial network distribution during zebrafish embryogenesis follows three defined spatial patterns. Wang et al. [271] showed that aging zebrafish retinas exhibit progressive declines in mtDNA integrity, fusion/fission balance, and antioxidant capacity and demonstrated therapeutic potential of resveratrol for age-related retinal degeneration. By using fluorescent dyes and genetically encoded biosensors, mitochondrial potential, Ca2+, ATP/ADP ratios, and ROS have been quantified in the lateral-line hair cells and afferent neurons of zebrafish [272]. In addition, Kim et al. [273] developed a transgenic zebrafish model expressing mitochondrially targeted GFP enabling visualization of organelle morphology and fragmentation following stressors such as valinomycin and carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP). These studies establish zebrafish as a unique model for analyzing mitochondrial function, biogenesis, and disease enabling studies of disease mechanisms, therapeutic target identification, and in vivo drug screening in developmental, neurological, aging, and toxicological research (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

Non-mammalian model organisms have become indispensable tools for investigating mitochondrial mechanisms underlying CNS disorders because they provide complementary experimental advantages across multiple levels of biological complexity (Table 6).
Mitochondrial pathways are highly conserved across species, therefore, simpler organisms provide powerful systems for dissecting fundamental mechanisms, whereas more complex models are required to reproduce neuronal architecture, brain function, and disease-associated phenotypes. From the simplicity and high-throughput capacity of unicellular systems such as S. cerevisiae and D. discoideum to the physiological and behavioral relevance of C. elegans, D. melanogaster, and D. rerio, these models offer unique advantages for investigating mitochondrial function and dysfunction in CNS disorders, and their selection should be guided by the conserved biological processes each model best recapitulates (Table 7).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Dictyostelium discoideum represent valuable platforms for studying fundamental aspects of mitochondrial biology because of their genetic accessibility and the conservation of essential mitochondrial processes. These models have been extensively used to investigate mechanisms such as OXPHOS defects, mitochondrial protein homeostasis, mitochondrial DNA maintenance, oxidative stress responses, and mitochondrial quality-control pathways. Although they lack a nervous system, they provide important insights into cellular mechanisms underlying CNS disorders and enable the rapid identification of disease-associated pathways and potential therapeutic targets. For studies focused on mitochondrial quality control and mitophagy, particularly pathways involving PINK1, Parkin, autophagy, and lysosomal regulation, Dictyostelium discoideum, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster have been highly informative. These models have contributed substantially to understanding how impaired mitochondrial clearance contributes to neuronal dysfunction, especially in PD and other neurodegenerative disorders. Caenorhabditis elegans provides an important transition between unicellular models and more complex animal models because it possesses a well-defined nervous system and allows direct visualization of mitochondrial behavior within neurons. Its transparent body, mapped neuronal network, genetic tractability, and short lifespan make it particularly well suited for investigating neuronal aging, mitochondrial transport, axonal degeneration, and mechanisms of neuroprotection. It has been widely employed to model PD, AD, ALS, HD, FRDA, and mitochondrial encephalopathies. Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most extensively used invertebrate models for mitochondrial CNS disease research because it combines genetic tools with measurable neurological phenotypes. It enables tissue-specific manipulation of mitochondrial genes and facilitates the analysis of locomotor behavior, neuronal survival, synaptic function, and neurodegeneration. Accordingly, Drosophila models have provided major contributions to understanding mitochondrial dysfunction in PD, AD, ALS, HD, FTD, spinocerebellar ataxias, and mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. For studies requiring greater physiological relevance to humans, Danio rerio offers a valuable vertebrate model. Its conserved CNS organization, rapid development, optical transparency, and compatibility with both genetic and chemical screening approaches allow real-time analysis of mitochondrial abnormalities in vivo. Zebrafish models have proven particularly useful for modeling mitochondrial encephalopathies, neurodevelopmental disorders, movement disorders, optic neuropathies, and neurodegenerative diseases. Their vertebrate nervous system provides a strong translational bridge toward mammalian studies.
Although no single non-mammalian model organism can fully recapitulate the complexity of human mitochondrial disorders affecting the CNS, their complementary use has enabled major advances in understanding of conserved mitochondrial pathways, including mitophagy, mitochondrial quality control, bioenergetic regulation, signaling networks, and neurodegenerative mechanisms. Features such as genetic tractability, rapid life cycles, live imaging capabilities, and suitability for high-throughput screening have accelerated both CNS disease modeling and therapeutic discovery. Furthermore, non-mammalian animal models are consistent with ethical frameworks and the principles of the 3Rs in animal experimentation, serving as effective alternatives to traditional mammalian models, thereby minimizing ethical concerns related to the use of higher vertebrates. Although each system has limitations arising from evolutionary distance, simplified nervous systems, or reduced translational complexity, their use in complementary and sequential research provides opportunities for mechanistic studies and preclinical therapeutic discovery. Collectively, these models continue to link fundamental mitochondrial biology with translational neuroscience, advancing understanding of CNS disorders and facilitating the development of novel therapeutic approaches.

5. Conclusions

Non-mammalian model organisms have become indispensable tools for advancing our understanding of mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders by offering diverse and complementary experimental advantages. Models ranging from the unicellular systems such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Dictyostelium discoideum to the multicellular organisms including Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and the vertebrate Danio rerio provide experimental platforms spanning different levels of biological complexity. Their use has generated major discoveries in conserved mitochondrial pathways, including mitophagy, mitochondrial quality control, respiratory function, bioenergetic signaling, and neurodegenerative mechanisms that are central to human CNS pathology. Their key strengths, including genetic tractability, rapid life cycles, optical transparency for live imaging, scalability, and compatibility with high-throughput screening, have enabled efficient disease modeling and accelerated therapeutic discovery. On the other hand, each model also possesses limitations arising from simplified physiology, evolutionary distance from humans, and incomplete representation of complex CNS organization. Consequently, findings from these systems often require validation in mammalian models. Nevertheless, integrating them with complementary research offers a powerful approach for linking fundamental mitochondrial biology with translational neuroscience. Technological advances, including genome editing, single-cell and spatial omics technologies, and advanced in vivo imaging, will further expand the utility of these models, accelerating mechanistic discoveries and the development of novel therapeutic strategies for mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.S.; investigation, D.S.S., A.H.M., A.C.G., V.F., I.V.M., A.F.V., R.A.W. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.S., A.H.M., A.C.G., V.F., I.V.M., A.F.V., R.A.W. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, D.S.S.; visualization, D.S.S., A.C.G., V.F., I.V.M., A.F.V. and J.M.; supervision, D.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (GPT-5.5, OpenAI) for text editing (grammar, structure, spelling, punctuation, and formatting). The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
3Rs-Replacement, reduction, and refinement
6-OHDA6-hydroxydopamine
ADAlzheimer’s disease
ADPAdenosine diphosphate
ALSAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis
AMPKAMP-activated protein kinase
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
Amyloid-β
CIComplex I
CMTCharcot–Marie–Tooth disease
CNSCentral nervous system
CRISPRClustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
DADopamine
DdCBEDddA-derived cytosine base editor
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
EREndoplasmic reticulum
FCCPCarbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone
FRDAFriedreich’s ataxia
FTDFrontotemporal dementia
GFPGreen fluorescent protein
HDHuntington’s disease
IISInsulin/IGF-1 signaling
KDKnockdown
KOKnockout
LHON-Leber hereditary optic neuropathy
LSLeigh syndrome
LSDLysergic acid diethylamide
MADDMultiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency
MELASMitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes
Micro-CTMicro-computed tomography
MILSMaternally inherited LS
MPP+1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
MPTP1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
mtDNAMitochondrial DNA
N/ANot applicable
NARPNeuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa syndrome
nDNANuclear DNA
NCLNeuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
NIHNational institutes of health
NMJNeuromuscular junction
OEOverexpression
OXPHOSOxidative phosphorylation
PDParkinson’s disease
PEOProgressive external ophthalmoplegia
POLGDNA polymerase γ catalytic subunit
PolyQPolyglutamine
RNARibonucleic acid
ROSReactive oxygen species
TALENTranscription activator-like effector nuclease
UPRmtMitochondrial unfolded protein response

References

  1. Alshial, E.E.; Abdulghaney, M.I.; Wadan, A.S.; Abdellatif, M.A.; Ramadan, N.E.; Suleiman, A.M.; Waheed, N.; Abdellatif, M.; Mohammed, H.S. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurological disorders: A narrative review and treatment overview. Life Sci. 2023, 334, 122257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Lu, T. Role of mitochondria in physiological activities, diseases, and therapy. Mol. Biomed. 2025, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Nunnari, J.; Suomalainen, A. Mitochondria: In sickness and in health. Cell 2012, 148, 1145–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Gorman, G.S.; Chinnery, P.F.; DiMauro, S.; Hirano, M.; Koga, Y.; McFarland, R.; Suomalainen, A.; Thorburn, D.R.; Zeviani, M.; Turnbull, D.M. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016, 2, 16080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Russell, O.M.; Gorman, G.S.; Lightowlers, R.N.; Turnbull, D.M. Mitochondrial Diseases: Hope for the Future. Cell 2020, 181, 168–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, L.; Yang, Z.; He, X.; Pu, S.; Yang, C.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Cen, X.; Zhao, H. Mitochondrial protein dysfunction in pathogenesis of neurological diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022, 15, 974480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Valenti, D.; Vacca, R.A. Primary and Secondary Mitochondrial Diseases: Etiologies and Therapeutic Strategies. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, W.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y. Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease: Mechanisms and potential targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Lin, M.T.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 2006, 443, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Maximino, C.; Silva, R.X.; da Silva Sde, N.; Rodrigues, L.S.; Barbosa, H.; de Carvalho, T.S.; Leão, L.K.; Lima, M.G.; Oliveira, K.R.; Herculano, A.M. Non-mammalian models in behavioral neuroscience: Consequences for biological psychiatry. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Ellenbroek, B.; Youn, J. Rodent models in neuroscience research: Is it a rat race? Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Mishra, R.; Upadhyay, A. An update on mammalian and non-mammalian animal models for biomarker development in neurodegenerative disorders. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2025, 82, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Neziri, S.; Köseoğlu, A.E.; Deniz Köseoğlu, G.; Özgültekin, B.; Özgentürk, N.Ö. Animal models in neuroscience with alternative approaches: Evolutionary, biomedical, and ethical perspectives. Anim. Model. Exp. Med. 2024, 7, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Y.; Dai, X.; Li, H.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, S.; Guo, J.; Shen, L.; Yang, H.; Lin, J.; et al. The role of mitochondrial dynamics in disease. MedComm 2023, 4, e462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Goffeau, A.; Barrell, B.G.; Bussey, H.; Davis, R.W.; Dujon, B.; Feldmann, H.; Galibert, F.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Jacq, C.; Johnston, M.; et al. Life with 6000 Genes. Science 1996, 274, 546–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Giaever, G.; Chu, A.M.; Ni, L.; Connelly, C.; Riles, L.; Véronneau, S.; Dow, S.; Lucau-Danila, A.; Anderson, K.; André, B.; et al. Functional Profiling of the Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Genome. Nature 2002, 418, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Kachroo, A.H.; Laurent, J.M.; Yellman, C.M.; Meyer, A.G.; Wilke, C.O.; Marcotte, E.M. Systematic Humanization of Yeast Genes Reveals Conserved Functions and Genetic Modularity. Science 2015, 348, 921–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. de Zamaroczy, M.; Bernardi, G. Sequence organization of the mitochondrial genome of yeast--a review. Gene 1985, 37, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Nagley, P.; Linnane, A.W. Mitochondrial DNA deficient petite mutants of yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1970, 39, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Wickner, R.B.; Kryndushkin, D.; Shewmaker, F.; McGlinchey, R.; Edskes, H.K. Study of Amyloids Using Yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1779, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Krobitsch, S.; Lindquist, S. Aggregation of Huntingtin in Yeast Varies with the Length of the Polyglutamine Expansion and the Expression of Chaperone Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1589–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Rencus-Lazar, S.; DeRowe, Y.; Adsi, H.; Gazit, E.; Laor, D. Yeast Models for the Study of Amyloid-Associated Disorders and Development of Future Therapy. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Walter, G.M.; Raveh, A.; Mok, S.-A.; McQuade, T.J.; Arevang, C.J.; Schultz, P.J.; Smith, M.C.; Asare, S.; Cruz, P.G.; Wisen, S.; et al. High-Throughput Screen of Natural Product Extracts in A Yeast Model of Polyglutamine Proteotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2014, 83, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Duennwald, M.L.; Jagadish, S.; Muchowski, P.J.; Lindquist, S. Flanking Sequences Profoundly Alter Polyglutamine Toxicity in Yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 11045–11050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Di Gregorio, S.E.; Duennwald, M.L. ALS Yeast Models—Past Success Stories and New Opportunities. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Outeiro, T.F.; Lindquist, S. Yeast Cells Provide Insight into Alpha-Synuclein Biology and Pathobiology. Science 2003, 302, 1772–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Vafai, S.B.; Mootha, V.K. Mitochondrial Disorders as Windows into an Ancient Organelle. Nature 2012, 491, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Lasserre, J.-P.; Dautant, A.; Aiyar, R.S.; Kucharczyk, R.; Glatigny, A.; Tribouillard-Tanvier, D.; Rytka, J.; Blondel, M.; Skoczen, N.; Reynier, P.; et al. Yeast as a System for Modeling Mitochondrial Disease Mechanisms and Discovering Therapies. Dis. Model. Mech. 2015, 8, 509–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Rutter, J.; Hughes, A.L. Power2: The Power of Yeast Genetics Applied to the Powerhouse of the Cell. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 26, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Malina, C.; Larsson, C.; Nielsen, J. Yeast Mitochondria: An Overview of Mitochondrial Biology and the Potential of Mitochondrial Systems Biology. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Macreadie, I.G. My Early Years of Yeast Mitochondrial Genetics. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Goswami, A.V.; Samaddar, M.; Sinha, D.; Purushotham, J.; D’Silva, P. Enhanced J-Protein Interaction and Compromised Protein Stability of mtHsp70 Variants Lead to Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 3317–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Kalia, M.; Miotto, M.; Ness, D.; Opie-Martin, S.; Spargo, T.P.; Di Rienzo, L.; Biagini, T.; Petrizzelli, F.; Al Khleifat, A.; Kabiljo, R.; et al. Molecular Dynamics Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase 1 Mutations Suggests Decoupling between Mechanisms Underlying ALS Onset and Progression. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 5296–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Freitas de Souza, G.; Magalhães, R.S.S.; Monteiro-Neto, J.R.; Martins, M.; Follmer, C.; Junqueira, M.; Eleutherio, E.C.A. The Effect of Aging on Post-Translational Modifications of Wild-Type Human SOD1 and the A5V ALS Mutant. GeroScience 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Di Nottia, M.; Rizza, T.; Baruffini, E.; Nesti, C.; Torraco, A.; Diodato, D.; Martinelli, D.; Dal Canto, F.; Gilea, A.I.; Zoccola, M.; et al. Severe Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy Caused by de Novo Variants in OPA1 Gene. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1437959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Ganapathi, M.; Friocourt, G.; Gueguen, N.; Friederich, M.W.; Le Gac, G.; Okur, V.; Loaëc, N.; Ludwig, T.; Ka, C.; Tanji, K.; et al. A Homozygous Splice Variant in ATP5PO, Disrupts Mitochondrial Complex V Function and Causes Leigh Syndrome in Two Unrelated Families. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2022, 45, 996–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Su, X.; Rak, M.; Tetaud, E.; Godard, F.; Sardin, E.; Bouhier, M.; Gombeau, K.; Caetano-Anollés, D.; Salin, B.; Chen, H.; et al. Deregulating Mitochondrial Metabolite and Ion Transport Has Beneficial Effects in Yeast and Human Cellular Models for NARP Syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 3792–3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Carli, S.; Levarlet, A.; Diodato, D.; Bertini, E.S.; Martinelli, D.; Malandrini, A.; Lopergolo, D.; Gallus, G.N.; Ganetzky, R.D.; La Morgia, C.; et al. Natural History of Patients with Mitochondrial ATPase Deficiency Due to Pathogenic Variants of MT-ATP6 and MT-ATP8. Neurology 2025, 104, e213462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Paul, M.F.; Velours, J.; Arselin de Chateaubodeau, G.; Aigle, M.; Guerin, B. The Role of Subunit 4, a Nuclear-Encoded Protein of the F0 Sector of Yeast Mitochondrial ATP Synthase, in the Assembly of the Whole Complex. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 185, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Soto, I.C.; Fontanesi, F.; Valledor, M.; Horn, D.; Singh, R.; Barrientos, A. Synthesis of Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit 1 Is Translationally Downregulated in the Absence of Functional F1F0-ATP Synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1793, 1776–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Chan, S.S.; Copeland, W.C. DNA polymerase gamma and mitochondrial disease: Understanding the consequence of POLG mutations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1787, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Eichinger, L.; Pachebat, J.A.; Glöckner, G.; Rajandream, M.-A.; Sucgang, R.; Berriman, M.; Song, J.; Olsen, R.; Szafranski, K.; Xu, Q.; et al. The Genome of the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium Discoideum. Nature. 2005, 435, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Ogawa, S.; Yoshino, R.; Angata, K.; Iwamoto, M.; Pi, M.; Kuroe, K.; Matsuo, K.; Morio, T.; Urushihara, H.; Yanagisawa, K.; et al. The Mitochondrial DNA of Dictyostelium Discoideum: Complete Sequence, Gene Content and Genome Organization. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2000, 263, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Faix, J.; Linkner, J.; Nordholz, B.; Platt, J.L.; Liao, X.-H.; Kimmel, A.R. The Application of the Cre-loxP System for Generating Multiple Knock-out and Knock-in Targeted Loci. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 983, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Yamashita, K.; Iriki, H.; Kamimura, Y.; Muramoto, T. CRISPR Toolbox for Genome Editing in Dictyostelium. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 721630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Bozzaro, S. The Past, Present and Future of Dictyostelium as a Model System. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2019, 63, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Bapteste, E.; Brinkmann, H.; Lee, J.A.; Moore, D.V.; Sensen, C.W.; Gordon, P.; Duruflé, L.; Gaasterland, T.; Lopez, P.; Müller, M.; et al. The Analysis of 100 Genes Supports the Grouping of Three Highly Divergent Amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 1414–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Fey, P.; Dodson, R.J.; Basu, S.; Hartline, E.C.; Chisholm, R.L. dictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center (Version 2.0)—A Progress Report. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2019, 63, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Martín-González, J.; Montero-Bullón, J.-F.; Lacal, J. Dictyostelium Discoideum as a Non-Mammalian Biomedical Model. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Bozzaro, S.; Eichinger, L. The Professional Phagocyte Dictyostelium Discoideum as a Model Host for Bacterial Pathogens. Curr. Drug Targets. 2011, 12, 942–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Artemenko, Y.; Lampert, T.J.; Devreotes, P.N. Moving towards a Paradigm: Common Mechanisms of Chemotactic Signaling in Dictyostelium and Mammalian Leukocytes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 3711–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Stuelten, C.H.; Parent, C.A.; Montell, D.J. Cell Motility in Cancer Invasion and Metastasis: Insights from Simple Model Organisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Tatischeff, I. Dictyostelium: A Model for Studying the Extracellular Vesicle Messengers Involved in Human Health and Disease. Cells 2019, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Domínguez-Martín, E.; Hernández-Elvira, M.; Vincent, O.; Coria, R.; Escalante, R. Unfolding the Endoplasmic Reticulum of a Social Amoeba: Dictyostelium Discoideum as a New Model for the Study of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Cells 2018, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Mesquita, A.; Cardenal-Muñoz, E.; Dominguez, E.; Muñoz-Braceras, S.; Nuñez-Corcuera, B.; Phillips, B.A.; Tábara, L.C.; Xiong, Q.; Coria, R.; Eichinger, L.; et al. Autophagy in Dictyostelium: Mechanisms, Regulation and Disease in a Simple Biomedical Model. Autophagy 2017, 13, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Mathavarajah, S.; VanIderstine, C.; Dellaire, G.; Huber, R.J. Cancer and the Breakdown of Multicellularity: What Dictyostelium Discoideum, a Social Amoeba, Can Teach Us. Bioessays 2021, 43, e2000156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Pearce, X.G.; Annesley, S.J.; Fisher, P.R. The Dictyostelium Model for Mitochondrial Biology and Disease. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2019, 63, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Haver, H.N.; Scaglione, K.M. Dictyostelium Discoideum as a Model for Investigating Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2021, 15, 759532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Andrews, R.M.; Kubacka, I.; Chinnery, P.F.; Lightowlers, R.N.; Turnbull, D.M.; Howell, N. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Francione, L.M.; Annesley, S.J.; Carilla-Latorre, S.; Escalante, R.; Fisher, P.R. The Dictyostelium Model for Mitochondrial Disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  61. Francione, L.M.; Fisher, P.R. Heteroplasmic Mitochondrial Disease in Dictyostelium Discoideum. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1510–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Lay, S.; Sanislav, O.; Annesley, S.J.; Fisher, P.R. Mitochondrial Stress Tests Using Seahorse Respirometry on Intact Dictyostelium Discoideum Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1407, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Wilczynska, Z.; Barth, C.; Fisher, P.R. Mitochondrial Mutations Impair Signal Transduction in Dictyostelium Discoideum Slugs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 234, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Inazu, Y.; Chae, S.C.; Maeda, Y. Transient Expression of a Mitochondrial Gene Cluster Including Rps4 Is Essential for the Phase-Shift of Dictyostelium Cells from Growth to Differentiation. Dev. Genet. 1999, 25, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Kotsifas, M.; Barth, C.; de Lozanne, A.; Lay, S.T.; Fisher, P.R. Chaperonin 60 and Mitochondrial Disease in Dictyostelium. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2002, 23, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Bokko, P.B.; Francione, L.; Bandala-Sanchez, E.; Ahmed, A.U.; Annesley, S.J.; Huang, X.; Khurana, T.; Kimmel, A.R.; Fisher, P.R. Diverse Cytopathologies in Mitochondrial Disease Are Caused by AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 1874–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Francione, L.; Smith, P.K.; Accari, S.L.; Taylor, P.E.; Bokko, P.B.; Bozzaro, S.; Beech, P.L.; Fisher, P.R. Legionella Pneumophila Multiplication Is Enhanced by Chronic AMPK Signalling in Mitochondrially Diseased Dictyostelium Cells. Dis. Model. Mech. 2009, 2, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Carilla-Latorre, S.; Gallardo, M.E.; Annesley, S.J.; Calvo-Garrido, J.; Graña, O.; Accari, S.L.; Smith, P.K.; Valencia, A.; Garesse, R.; Fisher, P.R.; et al. MidA Is a Putative Methyltransferase That Is Required for Mitochondrial Complex I Function. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 1674–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Domise, M.; Vingtdeux, V. AMPK in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Exp. Suppl. 2016, 107, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. Bakare, A.B.; Lesnefsky, E.J.; Iyer, S. Leigh Syndrome: A Tale of Two Genomes. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 693734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Sugiana, C.; Pagliarini, D.J.; McKenzie, M.; Kirby, D.M.; Salemi, R.; Abu-Amero, K.K.; Dahl, H.-H.M.; Hutchison, W.M.; Vascotto, K.A.; Smith, S.M.; et al. Mutation of C20orf7 Disrupts Complex I Assembly and Causes Lethal Neonatal Mitochondrial Disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 83, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Gerards, M.; Sluiter, W.; van den Bosch, B.J.C.; de Wit, L.E.A.; Calis, C.M.H.; Frentzen, M.; Akbari, H.; Schoonderwoerd, K.; Scholte, H.R.; Jongbloed, R.J.; et al. Defective Complex I Assembly Due to C20orf7 Mutations as a New Cause of Leigh Syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 2010, 47, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  73. Saada, A.; Edvardson, S.; Shaag, A.; Chung, W.K.; Segel, R.; Miller, C.; Jalas, C.; Elpeleg, O. Combined OXPHOS Complex I and IV Defect, Due to Mutated Complex I Assembly Factor C20ORF7. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2012, 35, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Carilla-Latorre, S.; Annesley, S.J.; Muñoz-Braceras, S.; Fisher, P.R.; Escalante, R. Ndufaf5 Deficiency in the Dictyostelium Model: New Roles in Autophagy and Development. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Li, W.; Fu, Y.; Halliday, G.M.; Sue, C.M. PARK Genes Link Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Alpha-Synuclein Pathology in Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 612476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  76. Skou, L.D.; Johansen, S.K.; Okarmus, J.; Meyer, M. Pathogenesis of DJ-1/PARK7-Mediated Parkinson’s Disease. Cells 2024, 13, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, S.; Annesley, S.J.; Jasim, R.A.F.; Fisher, P.R. The Parkinson’s Disease-Associated Protein DJ-1 Protects Dictyostelium Cells from AMPK-Dependent Outcomes of Oxidative Stress. Cells 2021, 10, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  78. Rosenbusch, K.E.; Oun, A.; Sanislav, O.; Lay, S.T.; Keizer-Gunnink, I.; Annesley, S.J.; Fisher, P.R.; Dolga, A.M.; Kortholt, A. A Conserved Role for LRRK2 and Roco Proteins in the Regulation of Mitochondrial Activity. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 734554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Chen, S.; Sanislav, O.; Annesley, S.J.; Fisher, P.R. Mitochondrial HTRA2 Plays a Positive, Protective Role in Dictyostelium Discoideum but Is Cytotoxic When Overexpressed. Genes. 2018, 9, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Zhang, L.; Shimoji, M.; Thomas, B.; Moore, D.J.; Yu, S.-W.; Marupudi, N.I.; Torp, R.; Torgner, I.A.; Ottersen, O.P.; Dawson, T.M.; et al. Mitochondrial Localization of the Parkinson’s Disease Related Protein DJ-1: Implications for Pathogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Chen, S.; Annesley, S.J.; Jasim, R.A.F.; Musco, V.J.; Sanislav, O.; Fisher, P.R. The Parkinson’s Disease-Associated Protein DJ-1 Plays a Positive Nonmitochondrial Role in Endocytosis in Dictyostelium Cells. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  82. Mroczek, K.; Fernando, S.; Fisher, P.R.; Annesley, S.J. Interactions and Cytotoxicity of Human Neurodegeneration- Associated Proteins Tau and α-Synuclein in the Simple Model Dictyostelium Discoideum. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 741662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Bross, P.; Fernandez-Guerra, P. Disease-Associated Mutations in the HSPD1 Gene Encoding the Large Subunit of the Mitochondrial HSP60/HSP10 Chaperonin Complex. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2016, 3, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  84. Torija, P.; Vicente, J.J.; Rodrigues, T.B.; Robles, A.; Cerdán, S.; Sastre, L.; Calvo, R.M.; Escalante, R. Functional Genomics in Dictyostelium: MidA, a New Conserved Protein, Is Required for Mitochondrial Function and Development. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Shahul Hameed, U.F.; Sanislav, O.; Lay, S.T.; Annesley, S.J.; Jobichen, C.; Fisher, P.R.; Swaminathan, K.; Arold, S.T. Proteobacterial Origin of Protein Arginine Methylation and Regulation of Complex I Assembly by MidA. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 1996–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Quirós, P.M.; Langer, T.; López-Otín, C. New Roles for Mitochondrial Proteases in Health, Ageing and Disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Vande Walle, L.; Lamkanfi, M.; Vandenabeele, P. The Mitochondrial Serine Protease HtrA2/Omi: An Overview. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. van Egmond, W.N.; van Haastert, P.J.M. Characterization of the Roco Protein Family in Dictyostelium Discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  89. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974, 77, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  90. White, J.G.; Southgate, E.; Thomson, J.N.; Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1986, 314, 1–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Cook, S.J.; Jarrell, T.A.; Brittin, C.A.; Wang, Y.; Bloniarz, A.E.; Yakovlev, M.A.; Nguyen, K.C.Q.; Tang, L.T.; Bayer, E.A.; Duerr, J.S.; et al. Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes. Nature 2019, 571, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  92. Varshney, L.R.; Chen, B.L.; Paniagua, E.; Hall, D.H.; Chklovskii, D.B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, e1001066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Towlson, E.K.; Vértes, P.E.; Ahnert, S.E.; Schafer, W.R.; Bullmore, E.T. The rich club of the C. elegans neuronal connectome. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 6380–6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Witvliet, D.; Mulcahy, B.; Mitchell, J.K.; Meirovitch, Y.; Berger, D.R.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Koh, W.X.; Parvathala, R.; Holmyard, D.; et al. Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation. Nature 2021, 596, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. Ripoll-Sánchez, L.; Watteyne, J.; Sun, H.; Fernandez, R.; Taylor, S.R.; Weinreb, A.; Bentley, B.L.; Hammarlund, M.; Miller, D.M., 3rd; Hobert, O.; et al. The neuropeptidergic connectome of C. elegans. Neuron 2023, 111, 3570–3589.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, J.; Averbukh, M.; Alcala, A.; Aviles Barahona, R.; Vega, M.; Garcia, G.; Higuchi-Sanabria, R.; Dutta, N. Imaging and Quantifying Mitochondrial Morphology in C. elegans During Aging. J. Vis. Exp. 2025, 215, 10.3791/67610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Laine, R.F.; Sinnige, T.; Ma, K.Y.; Haack, A.J.; Poudel, C.; Gaida, P.; Curry, N.; Perni, M.; Nollen, E.A.A.; Dobson, C.M.; et al. Fast Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Reveals the Aggregation Processes of α-Synuclein and Polyglutamine in Aging Caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  98. Mitra, K.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Analysis of mitochondrial dynamics and functions using imaging approaches. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2010, 46, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  99. Shah, P.; Bao, Z.; Zaidel-Bar, R. Visualizing and quantifying molecular and cellular processes in Caenorhabditis elegans using light microscopy. Genetics 2022, 221, iyac068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  100. Corsi, A.K.; Wightman, B.; Chalfie, M. A Transparent Window into Biology: A Primer on Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2015, 200, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Kim, W.; Underwood, R.S.; Greenwald, I.; Shaye, D.D. OrthoList 2: A New Comparative Genomic Analysis of Human and Caenorhabditis elegans Genes. Genetics 2018, 210, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  102. Murphy, C.T.; Hu, P.J. Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling in C. elegans. In WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology; WormBook: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2013; pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, Y.; Zou, X.; Ding, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, X.; Liang, B. Comparative genomics and functional study of lipid metabolic genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Berk, Ş. Insulin and IGF-1 extend the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans by inhibiting insulin/insulin-like signaling and mTOR signaling pathways: C. elegans—Focused cancer research. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 729, 150347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Dickinson, D.J.; Ward, J.D.; Reiner, D.J.; Goldstein, B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  107. Mello, C.; Fire, A. DNA transformation. Methods Cell Biol. 1995, 48, 451–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  108. Li, C.; Kim, K. Neuropeptides. In WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology; WormBook: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  109. Frooninckx, L.; Van Rompay, L.; Temmerman, L.; Van Sinay, E.; Beets, I.; Janssen, T.; Husson, S.J.; Schoofs, L. Neuropeptide GPCRs in C. elegans. Front. Endocrinol. 2012, 3, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. Youle, R.J.; van der Bliek, A.M. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 2012, 337, 1062–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Onraet, T.; Zuryn, S. C. elegans as a model to study mitochondrial biology and disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 154, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  112. Maulik, M.; Mitra, S.; Bult-Ito, A.; Taylor, B.E.; Vayndorf, E.M. Behavioral Phenotyping and Pathological Indicators of Parkinson’s Disease in C. elegans Models. Front. Genet. 2017, 13;8, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Zhou, T.; Wang, G.; Li, Z. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Useful Model for Studying Aging Mutations. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 554994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Hunt, P.R. The C. elegans model in toxicity testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017, 37, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  115. Zimmermann, J.; Obeng, N.; Yang, W.; Pees, B.; Petersen, C.; Waschina, S.; Kissoyan, K.A.; Aidley, J.; Hoeppner, M.P.; Bunk, B.; et al. The functional repertoire contained within the native microbiota of the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. ISME J. 2020, 14, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  116. Naranjo-Galindo, F.J.; Ai, R.; Fang, E.F.; Nilsen, H.L.; SenGupta, T. C. elegans as an Animal Model to Study the Intersection of DNA Repair, Aging and Neurodegeneration. Front. Aging. 2022, 3, 916118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Zhou, K.I.; Pincus, Z.; Slack, F.J. Longevity and stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging 2011, 3, 733–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  118. Athar, F.; Templeman, N.M. C. elegans as a model organism to study female reproductive health. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2022, 266, 111152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  119. Fox, B.W.; Ponomarova, O.; Lee, Y.U.; Zhang, G.; Giese, G.E.; Walker, M.; Roberto, N.M.; Na, H.; Rodrigues, P.R.; Curtis, B.J.; et al. C. elegans as a model for inter-individual variation in metabolism. Nature 2022, 607, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  120. Dyczkowska, A.A.; Chabowska-Kita, A. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism in obesity research. BioTechnologia 2021, 102, 337–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  121. Bryden, J.; Cohen, N. Neural control of Caenorhabditis elegans forward locomotion: The role of sensory feedback. Biol. Cybern. 2008, 98, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  122. Bargmann, C.I. Genetic and cellular analysis of behavior in C. elegans. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1993, 16, 47–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lakso, M.; Vartiainen, S.; Moilanen, A.M.; Sirviö, J.; Thomas, J.H.; Nass, R.; Blakely, R.D.; Wong, G. Dopaminergic neuronal loss and motor deficits in Caenorhabditis elegans overexpressing human alpha-synuclein. J. Neurochem. 2003, 86, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  124. Kuwahara, T.; Koyama, A.; Gengyo-Ando, K.; Masuda, M.; Kowa, H.; Tsunoda, M.; Mitani, S.; Iwatsubo, T. Familial Parkinson mutant alpha-synuclein causes dopamine neuron dysfunction in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  125. Vaccaro, A.; Tauffenberger, A.; Aggad, D.; Rouleau, G.; Drapeau, P.; Parker, J.A. Mutant TDP-43 and FUS cause age-dependent paralysis and neurodegeneration in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  126. Koopman, M.; Michels, H.; Dancy, B.M.; Kamble, R.; Mouchiroud, L.; Auwerx, J.; Nollen, E.A.; Houtkooper, R.H. A screening-based platform for the assessment of cellular respiration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 1798–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  127. Wang, Y.; Xu, E.; Musich, P.R.; Lin, F. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and the potential countermeasure. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 25, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  128. Houtkooper, R.H.; Mouchiroud, L.; Ryu, D.; Moullan, N.; Katsyuba, E.; Knott, G.; Williams, R.W.; Auwerx, J. Mitonuclear protein imbalance as a conserved longevity mechanism. Nature 2013, 497, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  129. Kanazawa, T.; Zappaterra, M.D.; Hasegawa, A.; Wright, A.P.; Newman-Smith, E.D.; Buttle, K.F.; McDonald, K.; Mannella, C.A.; van der Bliek, A.M. The C. elegans Opa1 homologue EAT-3 is essential for resistance to free radicals. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  130. Adebayo, M.; Singh, S.; Singh, A.P.; Dasgupta, S. Mitochondrial fusion and fission: The fine-tune balance for cellular homeostasis. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. O’Callaghan, B.; Hardy, J.; Plun-Favreau, H. PINK1: From Parkinson’s disease to mitophagy and back again. PLoS Biol. 2023, 21, e3002196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  132. Cooper, J.F.; Machiela, E.; Dues, D.J.; Spielbauer, K.K.; Senchuk, M.M.; Van Raamsdonk, J.M. Activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response promotes longevity and dopamine neuron survival in Parkinson’s disease models. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  133. Zhao, Q.; Wang, J.; Levichkin, I.V.; Stasinopoulos, S.; Ryan, M.T.; Hoogenraad, N.J. A mitochondrial specific stress response in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4411–4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  134. Bahr, T.; Katuri, J.; Liang, T.; Bai, Y. Mitochondrial chaperones in human health and disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 179, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  135. Palikaras, K.; Lionaki, E.; Tavernarakis, N. Coordination of mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis during ageing in C. elegans. Nature 2015, 521, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  136. Schiavi, A.; Maglioni, S.; Palikaras, K.; Shaik, A.; Strappazzon, F.; Brinkmann, V.; Torgovnick, A.; Castelein, N.; De Henau, S.; Braeckman, B.P.; et al. Iron-Starvation-Induced Mitophagy Mediates Lifespan Extension upon Mitochondrial Stress in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 1810–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  137. Guo, X.; Lu, J.; Miao, L.; Shen, E. Mitochondrial Proteome Reveals Metabolic Tuning by Restricted Insulin Signaling to Promote Longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biology 2025, 14, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. Zhou, S.; Wang, Z.; Klaunig, J.E. Caenorhabditis elegans neuron degeneration and mitochondrial suppression caused by selected environmental chemicals. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 4, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  139. Martinez, T.N.; Greenamyre, J.T. Toxin models of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 920–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  140. Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Ma, X.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Torres, A.K.; Fleischhart, V.; Inestrosa, N.C. Mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt): What we know thus far. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 12, 1405393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  142. Nargund, A.M.; Pellegrino, M.W.; Fiorese, C.J.; Baker, B.M.; Haynes, C.M. Mitochondrial import efficiency of ATFS-1 regulates mitochondrial UPR activation. Science 2012, 337, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  143. Jurcau, A. Molecular Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Huntington’s Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. Reddy, P.H. Increased mitochondrial fission and neuronal dysfunction in Huntington’s disease: Implications for molecular inhibitors of excessive mitochondrial fission. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Garret, M.; Du, Z.; Chazalon, M.; Cho, Y.H.; Baufreton, J. Alteration of GABAergic neurotransmission in Huntington’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2018, 24, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Chen, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, S. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mechanism: Insights from the Caenorhabditis elegans Models. Cells 2024, 13, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Rolland, S.G.; Motori, E.; Memar, N.; Hench, J.; Frank, S.; Winklhofer, K.F.; Conradt, B. Impaired complex IV activity in response to loss of LRPPRC function can be compensated by mitochondrial hyperfusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2967–E2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  148. Ast, T.; Meisel, J.D.; Patra, S.; Wang, H.; Grange, R.M.H.; Kim, S.H.; Calvo, S.E.; Orefice, L.L.; Nagashima, F.; Ichinose, F.; et al. Hypoxia Rescues Frataxin Loss by Restoring Iron Sulfur Cluster Biogenesis. Cell 2019, 177, 1507–1521.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  149. Bratic, I.; Hench, J.; Henriksson, J.; Antebi, A.; Bürglin, T.R.; Trifunovic, A. Mitochondrial DNA level, but not active replicase, is essential for Caenorhabditis elegans development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1817–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  150. Haroon, S.; Li, A.; Weinert, J.L.; Fritsch, C.; Ericson, N.G.; Alexander-Floyd, J.; Braeckman, B.P.; Haynes, C.M.; Bielas, J.H.; Gidalevitz, T.; et al. Multiple Molecular Mechanisms Rescue mtDNA Disease in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 3115–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  151. Casas, R.B.; Risato, G.; Zuppardo, A.; Viscomi, C.; Argenton, F.; Doimo, M.; Facchinello, N.; Tiso, N. Model organisms in POLG-related disorders: Insights from yeast to multicellular systems. Cell Death Dis. 2025, 17, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  152. Giansanti, M.G.; Frappaolo, A.; Piergentili, R. Drosophila melanogaster: How and Why It Became a Model Organism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  153. Obafemi, O.T.; Ayeleso, A.O.; Adewale, O.B.; Unuofin, J.; Ekundayo, B.E.; Ntwasa, M.; Lebelo, S.L. Animal models in biomedical research: Relevance of Drosophila melanogaster. Heliyon 2024, 11, e41605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  154. Victor Atoki, A.; Aja, P.M.; Shinkafi, T.S.; Ondari, E.N.; Adeniyi, A.I.; Fasogbon, I.V.; Dangana, R.S.; Shehu, U.U.; Akin-Adewumi, A. Exploring the versatility of Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism in biomedical research: A comprehensive review. Fly 2025, 19, 2420453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  155. Brand, A.H.; Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 1993, 118, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  156. Gratz, S.J.; Rubinstein, C.D.; Harrison, M.M.; Wildonger, J.; O’Connor-Giles, K.M. CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in Drosophila. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2015, 111, 31.2.1–31.2.20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  157. Bernstein, E.; Caudy, A.A.; Hammond, S.M.; Hannon, G.J. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 2001, 409, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  158. Rubin, G.M.; Yandell, M.D.; Wortman, J.R.; Gabor Miklos, G.L.; Nelson, C.R.; Hariharan, I.K.; Fortini, M.E.; Li, P.W.; Apweiler, R.; Fleischmann, W.; et al. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 2000, 287, 2204–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  159. Chiu, J.C.; Low, K.H.; Pike, D.H.; Yildirim, E.; Edery, I. Assaying locomotor activity to study circadian rhythms and sleep parameters in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 43, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  160. Hendricks, J.C.; Finn, S.M.; Panckeri, K.A.; Chavkin, J.; Williams, J.A.; Sehgal, A.; Pack, A.I. Rest in Drosophila is a sleep-like state. Neuron 2000, 25, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Shaw, P.J.; Cirelli, C.; Greenspan, R.J.; Tononi, G. Correlates of sleep and waking in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2000, 287, 1834–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  162. Artiushin, G.; Sehgal, A. The Drosophila circuitry of sleep-wake regulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017, 44, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  163. Kravitz, E.A.; Fernandez, M.P. Aggression in Drosophila. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 129, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  164. Palavicino-Maggio, C.B.; Sengupta, S. The Neuromodulatory Basis of Aggression: Lessons from the Humble Fruit Fly. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 836666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  165. Kaun, K.R.; Devineni, A.V.; Heberlein, U. Drosophila melanogaster as a model to study drug addiction. Hum. Genet. 2012, 131, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Cummins-Beebee, P.N.; Chvilicek, M.M.; Rothenfluh, A. The Stage-Based Model of Addiction-Using Drosophila to Investigate Alcohol and Psychostimulant Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  167. Kanno, M.; Hiramatsu, S.; Kondo, S.; Tanimoto, H.; Ichinose, T. Voluntary intake of psychoactive substances is regulated by the dopamine receptor Dop1R1 in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  168. Alivisatos, A.P.; Chun, M.; Church, G.M.; Greenspan, R.J.; Roukes, M.L.; Yuste, R. The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron 2012, 74, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  169. Kasture, A.S.; Hummel, T.; Sucic, S.; Freissmuth, M. Big Lessons from Tiny Flies: Drosophila melanogaster as a Model to Explore Dysfunction of Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Neurotransmitter Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  170. Kratsios, P.; Stolfi, A.; Levine, M.; Hobert, O. Coordinated regulation of cholinergic motor neuron traits through a conserved terminal selector gene. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 15, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  171. Leyssen, M.; Hassan, B.A. A fruitfly’s guide to keeping the brain wired. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  172. Sullivan, K.G.; Bashaw, G.J. Commissureless acts as a substrate adapter in a conserved Nedd4 E3 ubiquitin ligase pathway to promote axon growth across the midline. eLife 2025, 13, RP92757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Agcaoili, J.; Evans, T.A. Drosophila Robo3 guides longitudinal axons partially independently of its cytodomain. Micropublication Biol. 2024, 2024, 10-17912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  174. Fernandes, A.R.; Martins, J.P.; Gomes, E.R.; Mendes, C.S.; Teodoro, R.O. Drosophila motor neuron boutons remodel through membrane blebbing coupled with muscle contraction. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  175. Nelson, N.; Miller, V.; Broadie, K. Neuron-to-glia and glia-to-glia signaling directs critical period experience-dependent synapse pruning. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1540052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  176. Yamada, D.; Davidson, A.M.; Hige, T. Cyclic nucleotide-induced bidirectional long-term synaptic plasticity in Drosophila mushroom body. J. Physiol. 2024, 602, 2019–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  177. Huang, N.; Zhou, J.; Gao, Y.; Peng, Y.; Hu, W.; Ou, G.; Li, Q.; Zhong, Y. Rapid memory shift between different synaptic ensembles promotes forgetting in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2025, 35, 3119–3132.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  178. Filošević Vujnović, A.; Saftić Martinović, L.; Medija, M.; Andretić Waldowski, R. Distinct and Dynamic Changes in the Temporal Profiles of Neurotransmitters in Drosophila melanogaster Brain following Volatilized Cocaine or Methamphetamine Administrations. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  179. Venken, K.J.; Simpson, J.H.; Bellen, H.J. Genetic manipulation of genes and cells in the nervous system of the fruit fly. Neuron 2011, 72, 202–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  180. Aimon, S.; Katsuki, T.; Jia, T.; Grosenick, L.; Broxton, M.; Deisseroth, K.; Sejnowski, T.J.; Greenspan, R.J. Fast near-whole-brain imaging in adult Drosophila during responses to stimuli and behavior. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e2006732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  181. Yang, H.H.; St-Pierre, F.; Sun, X.; Ding, X.; Lin, M.Z.; Clandinin, T.R. Subcellular Imaging of Voltage and Calcium Signals Reveals Neural Processing In Vivo. Cell 2016, 166, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  182. Kirk, M.J.; Benlian, B.R.; Han, Y.; Gold, A.; Ravi, A.; Deal, P.E.; Molina, R.S.; Drobizhev, M.; Dickman, D.; Scott, K.; et al. Voltage Imaging in Drosophila Using a Hybrid Chemical-Genetic Rhodamine Voltage Reporter. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 754027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  183. Prüßing, K.; Voigt, A.; Schulz, J.B. Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2013, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  184. Chakraborty, R.; Vepuri, V.; Mhatre, S.D.; Paddock, B.E.; Miller, S.; Michelson, S.J.; Delvadia, R.; Desai, A.; Vinokur, M.; Melicharek, D.J.; et al. Characterization of a Drosophila Alzheimer’s disease model: Pharmacological rescue of cognitive defects. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  185. Clark, I.E.; Dodson, M.W.; Jiang, C.; Cao, J.H.; Huh, J.R.; Seol, J.H.; Yoo, S.J.; Hay, B.A.; Guo, M. Drosophila pink1 is required for mitochondrial function and interacts genetically with parkin. Nature 2006, 441, 1162–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  186. Krench, M.; Littleton, J.T. Modeling Huntington disease in Drosophila: Insights into axonal transport defects and modifiers of toxicity. Fly 2013, 7, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  187. Bateman, J.M. Mitochondrial DNA Transport in Drosophila Neurons. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2431, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  188. Baltzer, C.; Tiefenböck, S.K.; Marti, M.; Frei, C. Nutrition controls mitochondrial biogenesis in the Drosophila adipose tissue through Delg and cyclin D/Cdk4. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  189. Poole, A.C.; Thomas, R.E.; Yu, S.; Vincow, E.S.; Pallanck, L. The mitochondrial fusion-promoting factor mitofusin is a substrate of the PINK1/parkin pathway. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  190. Ziviani, E.; Tao, R.N.; Whitworth, A.J. Drosophila parkin requires PINK1 for mitochondrial translocation and ubiquitinates mitofusin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5018–5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  191. Dorn, G.W., 2nd; Clark, C.F.; Eschenbacher, W.H.; Kang, M.Y.; Engelhard, J.T.; Warner, S.J.; Matkovich, S.J.; Jowdy, C.C. MARF and Opa1 control mitochondrial and cardiac function in Drosophila. Circ. Res. 2011, 108, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  192. Uttekar, B.; Verma, R.K.; Tomer, D.; Rikhy, R. Mitochondrial morphology dynamics and ROS regulate apical polarity and differentiation in Drosophila follicle cells. Development 2024, 151, dev201732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  193. Walker, D.W.; Hájek, P.; Muffat, J.; Knoepfle, D.; Cornelison, S.; Attardi, G.; Benzer, S. Hypersensitivity to oxygen and shortened lifespan in a Drosophila mitochondrial complex II mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16382–16387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  194. Scialò, F.; Sriram, A.; Fernández-Ayala, D.; Gubina, N.; Lõhmus, M.; Nelson, G.; Logan, A.; Cooper, H.M.; Navas, P.; Enríquez, J.A.; et al. Mitochondrial ROS Produced via Reverse Electron Transport Extend Animal Lifespan. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  195. Burman, J.L.; Itsara, L.S.; Kayser, E.B.; Suthammarak, W.; Wang, A.M.; Kaeberlein, M.; Sedensky, M.M.; Morgan, P.G.; Pallanck, L.J. A Drosophila model of mitochondrial disease caused by a complex I mutation that uncouples proton pumping from electron transfer. Dis. Model. Mech. 2014, 7, 1165–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  196. Graham, C.; Stefanatos, R.; Yek, A.E.H.; Spriggs, R.V.; Loh, S.H.Y.; Uribe, A.H.; Zhang, T.; Martins, L.M.; Maddocks, O.D.K.; Scialo, F.; et al. Mitochondrial ROS signalling requires uninterrupted electron flow and is lost during ageing in flies. Geroscience 2022, 44, 1961–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  197. Copeland, J.M.; Cho, J.; Lo, T., Jr.; Hur, J.H.; Bahadorani, S.; Arabyan, T.; Rabie, J.; Soh, J.; Walker, D.W. Extension of Drosophila life span by RNAi of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1591–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  198. Vesala, L.; Basikhina, Y.; Tuomela, T.; Nurminen, A.; Siukola, E.; Vale, P.F.; Salminen, T.S. Mitochondrial perturbation in immune cells enhances cell-mediated innate immunity in Drosophila. BMC Biol. 2024, 22, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  199. Brischigliaro, M.; Fernandez-Vizarra, E.; Viscomi, C. Mitochondrial Neurodegeneration: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster Models. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  200. Rodrigues, A.P.C.; Novaes, A.C.; Ciesielski, G.L.; Oliveira, M.T. Mitochondrial DNA maintenance in Drosophila melanogaster. Biosci. Rep. 2022, 42, BSR20211693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  201. Matsushima, Y.; Kaguni, L.S. Differential phenotypes of active site and human autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia mutations in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA helicase expressed in Schneider cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 9436–9444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  202. Garesse, R.; Kaguni, L.S. A Drosophila model of mitochondrial DNA replication: Proteins, genes and regulation. IUBMB Life 2005, 57, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  203. Sun, Z.D.; Hu, J.X.; Wu, J.R.; Zhou, B.; Huang, Y.P. Toxicities of amyloid-beta and tau protein are reciprocally enhanced in the Drosophila model. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 2286–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  204. Barati, A.; Masoudi, R.; Yousefi, R.; Monsefi, M.; Mirshafiey, A. Tau and amyloid beta differentially affect the innate immune genes expression in Drosophila models of Alzheimer’s disease and β- D Mannuronic acid (M2000) modulates the dysregulation. Gene 2022, 808, 145972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  205. Lewis, E.A.; Smith, G.A. Using Drosophila models of Huntington’s disease as a translatable tool. J. Neurosci. Methods 2016, 265, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  206. Green, E.W.; Giorgini, F. Choosing and using Drosophila models to characterize modifiers of Huntington’s disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  207. Lin, R.; Rittenhouse, D.; Sweeney, K.; Potluri, P.; Wallace, D.C. TSPO, a Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Protein, Controls Ethanol-Related Behaviors in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  208. Flippo, K.H.; Strack, S. An emerging role for mitochondrial dynamics in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2017, 187, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  209. Samardžija, B.; Petrović, M.; Zaharija, B.; Medija, M.; Meštrović, A.; Bradshaw, N.J.; Filošević Vujnović, A.; Andretić Waldowski, R. Transgenic Drosophila Melanogaster Carrying a Human Full-Length DISC1 Construct (UAS-hflDISC1) Showing Effects on Social Interaction Networks. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 8526–8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  210. Lathen, D.R.; Merrill, C.B.; Rothenfluh, A. Flying Together: Drosophila as a Tool to Understand the Genetics of Human Alcoholism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  211. de Castro, I.P.; Costa, A.C.; Celardo, I.; Tufi, R.; Dinsdale, D.; Loh, S.H.; Martins, L.M. Drosophila ref(2)P is required for the parkin-mediated suppression of mitochondrial dysfunction in pink1 mutants. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  212. Cornelissen, T.; Vilain, S.; Vints, K.; Gounko, N.; Verstreken, P.; Vandenberghe, W. Deficiency of parkin and PINK1 impairs age-dependent mitophagy in Drosophila. eLife 2018, 7, e35878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  213. Iijima-Ando, K.; Hearn, S.A.; Shenton, C.; Gatt, A.; Zhao, L.; Iijima, K. Mitochondrial mislocalization underlies Abeta42-induced neuronal dysfunction in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  214. Ling, D.; Song, H.J.; Garza, D.; Neufeld, T.P.; Salvaterra, P.M. Abeta42-induced neurodegeneration via an age-dependent autophagic-lysosomal injury in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  215. Li, X.J.; Orr, A.L.; Li, S. Impaired mitochondrial trafficking in Huntington’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1802, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  216. Campesan, S.; Del Popolo, I.; Marcou, K.; Straatman-Iwanowska, A.; Repici, M.; Boytcheva, K.V.; Cotton, V.E.; Allcock, N.; Rosato, E.; Kyriacou, C.P.; et al. Bypassing mitochondrial defects rescues Huntington’s phenotypes in Drosophila. Neurobiol. Dis. 2023, 185, 106236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  217. Godfrey, R.K.; Alsop, E.; Bjork, R.T.; Chauhan, B.S.; Ruvalcaba, H.C.; Antone, J.; Gittings, L.M.; Michael, A.F.; Williams, C.; Halaufia, G.; et al. Modelling TDP-43 proteinopathy in Drosophila uncovers shared and neuron-specific targets across ALS and FTD relevant circuits. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2023, 11, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  218. Nemtsova, Y.; Steinert, B.L.; Wharton, K.A. Compartment specific mitochondrial dysfunction in Drosophila knock-in model of ALS reversed by altered gene expression of OXPHOS subunits and pro-fission factor Drp1. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2023, 125, 103834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  219. Knabbe, J.; Protzmann, J.; Schneider, N.; Berger, M.; Dannehl, D.; Wei, S.; Strahle, C.; Tegtmeier, M.; Jaiswal, A.; Zheng, H.; et al. Single-dose ethanol intoxication causes acute and lasting neuronal changes in the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2122477119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  220. Chia, K.; Klingseisen, A.; Sieger, D.; Priller, J. Zebrafish as a Model Organism for Neurodegenerative Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022, 15, 940484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  221. Lawrence, C.; Adatto, I.; Best, J.; James, A.; Maloney, K. Generation Time of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) and Medakas (Oryzias Latipes) Housed in the Same Aquaculture Facility. Lab. Anim. 2012, 41, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  222. Schmidt, R.; Strähle, U.; Scholpp, S. Neurogenesis in Zebrafish—From Embryo to Adult. Neural Dev. 2013, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  223. Wasel, O.; Freeman, J.L. Chemical and Genetic Zebrafish Models to Define Mechanisms of and Treatments for Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  224. Howe, K.; Clark, M.D.; Torroja, C.F.; Torrance, J.; Berthelot, C.; Muffato, M.; Collins, J.E.; Humphray, S.; McLaren, K.; Matthews, L.; et al. The Zebrafish Reference Genome Sequence and Its Relationship to the Human Genome. Nature 2013, 496, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  225. Martier, R.; Konstantinova, P. Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Slowing Down the Ticking Clock. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 580179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  226. Fichi, G.; Naef, V.; Barca, A.; Longo, G.; Fronte, B.; Verri, T.; Santorelli, F.M.; Marchese, M.; Petruzzella, V. Fishing in the Cell Powerhouse: Zebrafish as a Tool for Exploration of Mitochondrial Defects Affecting the Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  227. Bashirzade, A.A.; Zabegalov, K.N.; Volgin, A.D.; Belova, A.S.; Demin, K.A.; de Abreu, M.S.; Babchenko, V.Y.; Bashirzade, K.A.; Yenkoyan, K.B.; Tikhonova, M.A.; et al. Modeling Neurodegenerative Disorders in Zebrafish. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 138, 104679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  228. Kalueff, A.V.; Gebhardt, M.; Stewart, A.M.; Cachat, J.M.; Brimmer, M.; Chawla, J.S.; Craddock, C.; Kyzar, E.J.; Roth, A.; Landsman, S.; et al. Towards a Comprehensive Catalog of Zebrafish Behavior 1.0 and Beyond. Zebrafish 2013, 10, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  229. Otsuka, T.; Matsui, H. Fish Models for Exploring Mitochondrial Dysfunction Affecting Neurodegenerative Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  230. Hughes, G.L.; Lones, M.A.; Bedder, M.; Currie, P.D.; Smith, S.L.; Pownall, M.E. Machine Learning Discriminates a Movement Disorder in a Zebrafish Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Dis. Models Mech. 2020, 13, dmm045815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  231. Sallinen, V.; Kolehmainen, J.; Priyadarshini, M.; Toleikyte, G.; Chen, Y.C.; Panula, P. Dopaminergic Cell Damage and Vulnerability to MPTP in Pink1 Knockdown Zebrafish. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  232. Ramesh, T.; Lyon, A.N.; Pineda, R.H.; Wang, C.; Janssen, P.M.L.; Canan, B.D.; Burghes, A.H.M.; Beattie, C.E. A Genetic Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Zebrafish Displays Phenotypic Hallmarks of Motoneuron Disease. Dis. Models Mech. 2010, 3, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  233. Butti, Z.; Pan, Y.E.; Giacomotto, J.; Patten, S.A. Reduced C9orf72 Function Leads to Defective Synaptic Vesicle Release and Neuromuscular Dysfunction in Zebrafish. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  234. Javed, I.; Zhang, Z.; Adamcik, J.; Andrikopoulos, N.; Li, Y.; Otzen, D.E.; Lin, S.; Mezzenga, R.; Davis, T.P.; Ding, F.; et al. Accelerated Amyloid Beta Pathogenesis by Bacterial Amyloid FapC. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  235. Nery, L.R.; Eltz, N.S.; Hackman, C.; Fonseca, R.; Altenhofen, S.; Guerra, H.N.; Freitas, V.M.; Bonan, C.D.; Vianna, M.R.M.R. Brain Intraventricular Injection of Amyloid-β in Zebrafish Embryo Impairs Cognition and Increases Tau Phosphorylation, Effects Reversed by Lithium. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  236. Koehler, D.; Williams, F.E. Utilizing Zebrafish and Okadaic Acid to Study Alzheimer’s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 1538–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  237. Pu, Y.-Z.; Liang, L.; Fu, A.-L.; Liu, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, Q.; Wu, D.; Sun, M.-J.; Zhang, Y.-G.; Zhao, B.-Q. Generation of Alzheimer’s Disease Transgenic Zebrafish Expressing Human APP Mutation Under Control of Zebrafish Appb Promotor. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016, 14, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  238. Paquet, D.; Bhat, R.; Sydow, A.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Berg, S.; Hellberg, S.; Fälting, J.; Distel, M.; Köster, R.W.; Schmid, B.; et al. A Zebrafish Model of Tauopathy Allows in Vivo Imaging of Neuronal Cell Death and Drug Evaluation. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  239. Lee, J.-G.; Cho, H.-J.; Jeong, Y.-M.; Lee, J.-S. Genetic Approaches Using Zebrafish to Study the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis in Neurological Disorders. Cells 2021, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  240. Merrifield, G.D.; Mullin, J.; Gallagher, L.; Tucker, C.; Jansen, M.A.; Denvir, M.; Holmes, W.M. Rapid and Recoverable in Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Adult Zebrafish at 7T. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2017, 37, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  241. Khan, K.M.; Collier, A.D.; Meshalkina, D.A.; Kysil, E.V.; Khatsko, S.L.; Kolesnikova, T.; Morzherin, Y.Y.; Warnick, J.E.; Kalueff, A.V.; Echevarria, D.J. Zebrafish Models in Neuropsychopharmacology and CNS Drug Discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1925–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  242. Sabharwal, A.; Campbell, J.M.; Schwab, T.L.; WareJoncas, Z.; Wishman, M.D.; Ata, H.; Liu, W.; Ichino, N.; Hunter, D.E.; Bergren, J.D.; et al. A Primer Genetic Toolkit for Exploring Mitochondrial Biology and Disease Using Zebrafish. Genes 2022, 13, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  243. Broughton, R.E.; Milam, J.E.; Roe, B.A. The Complete Sequence of the Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Mitochondrial Genome and Evolutionary Patterns in Vertebrate Mitochondrial DNA. Genome Res. 2001, 11, 1958–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  244. Pickett, S.B.; Thomas, E.D.; Sebe, J.Y.; Linbo, T.; Esterberg, R.; Hailey, D.W.; Raible, D.W. Cumulative Mitochondrial Activity Correlates with Ototoxin Susceptibility in Zebrafish Mechanosensory Hair Cells. eLife 2018, 7, e38062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  245. Plucińska, G.; Paquet, D.; Hruscha, A.; Godinho, L.; Haass, C.; Schmid, B.; Misgeld, T. In Vivo Imaging of Disease-Related Mitochondrial Dynamics in a Vertebrate Model System. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 16203–16212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  246. Dowling, J.J.; Arbogast, S.; Hur, J.; Nelson, D.D.; McEvoy, A.; Waugh, T.; Marty, I.; Lunardi, J.; Brooks, S.V.; Kuwada, J.Y.; et al. Oxidative Stress and Successful Antioxidant Treatment in Models of RYR1-Related Myopathy. Brain 2012, 135, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  247. Song, Y.; Selak, M.A.; Watson, C.T.; Coutts, C.; Scherer, P.C.; Panzer, J.A.; Gibbs, S.; Scott, M.O.; Willer, G.; Gregg, R.G.; et al. Mechanisms Underlying Metabolic and Neural Defects in Zebrafish and Human Multiple Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency (MADD). PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  248. Mandal, A.; Pinter, K.; Drerup, C.M. Analyzing Neuronal Mitochondria in Vivo Using Fluorescent Reporters in Zebrafish. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 6, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  249. Vicente, M.; Salgado-Almario, J.; Soriano, J.; Burgos, M.; Domingo, B.; Llopis, J. Visualization of Mitochondrial Ca2+ Signals in Skeletal Muscle of Zebrafish Embryos with Bioluminescent Indicators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  250. Mandal, A.; Wong, H.T.C.; Pinter, K.; Mosqueda, N.; Beirl, A.; Lomash, R.M.; Won, S.; Kindt, K.S.; Drerup, C.M. Retrograde Mitochondrial Transport Is Essential for Organelle Distribution and Health in Zebrafish Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 1371–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  251. Drerup, C.M.; Herbert, A.L.; Monk, K.R.; Nechiporuk, A.V. Regulation of Mitochondria-Dynactin Interaction and Mitochondrial Retrograde Transport in Axons. eLife 2017, 6, E22234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  252. Rahn, J.J.; Bestman, J.E.; Stackley, K.D.; Chan, S.S. Zebrafish lacking functional DNA polymerase gamma survive to juvenile stage, despite rapid and sustained mitochondrial DNA depletion, altered energetics and growth. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 10338–10352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  253. Facchinello, N.; Laquatra, C.; Locatello, L.; Beffagna, G.; Brañas Casas, R.; Fornetto, C.; Dinarello, A.; Martorano, L.; Vettori, A.; Risato, G.; et al. Efficient clofilium tosylate-mediated rescue of POLG-related disease phenotypes in zebrafish. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  254. Brañas Casas, R.; Zuppardo, A.; Risato, G.; Dinarello, A.; Celeghin, R.; Fontana, C.; Grelloni, E.; Gilea, A.I.; Viscomi, C.; Rasola, A.; et al. Zebrafish polg2 knock-out recapitulates human POLG-disorders; implications for drug treatment. Cell Death Dis. 2024, 15, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  255. Chen, Y.L.; Chung, B.H.Y.; Mimaki, M.; Uchino, S.; Chien, Y.H.; Mak, C.C.Y.; Peng, S.S.F.; Wang, W.C.; Lin, Y.L.; Hwu, W.L.; et al. NDUFB7 Mutations Cause Brain Neuronal Defects, Lactic Acidosis, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Humans and Zebrafish. Cell Death Discov. 2025, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  256. Vettori, A.; Bergamin, G.; Moro, E.; Vazza, G.; Polo, G.; Tiso, N.; Argenton, F.; Mostacciuolo, M.L. Developmental Defects and Neuromuscular Alterations Due to Mitofusin 2 Gene (MFN2) Silencing in Zebrafish: A New Model for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 2A Neuropathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2011, 21, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  257. Chapman, A.L.; Bennett, E.J.; Ramesh, T.M.; De Vos, K.J.; Grierson, A.J. Axonal Transport Defects in a Mitofusin 2 Loss of Function Model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease in Zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  258. Chaouch, A.; Porcelli, V.; Cox, D.; Edvardson, S.; Scarcia, P.; De Grassi, A.; Pierri, C.L.; Cossins, J.; Laval, S.H.; Griffin, H.; et al. Mutations in the Mitochondrial Citrate Carrier SLC25A1 Are Associated with Impaired Neuromuscular Transmission. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2014, 1, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  259. Bestman, J.E.; Stackley, K.D.; Rahn, J.J.; Williamson, T.J.; Chan, S.S.L. The Cellular and Molecular Progression of Mitochondrial Dysfunction Induced by 2,4-Dinitrophenol in Developing Zebrafish Embryos. Differentiation 2015, 89, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  260. Pinho, B.R.; Santos, M.M.; Fonseca-Silva, A.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Oliveira, J.M.A. How Mitochondrial Dysfunction Affects Zebrafish Development and Cardiovascular Function: An in Vivo Model for Testing Mitochondria-Targeted Drugs. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 1072–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  261. Azevedo, R.D.S.; Falcão, K.V.G.; Amaral, I.P.G.; Leite, A.C.R.; Bezerra, R.S. Mitochondria as Targets for Toxicity and Metabolism Research Using Zebrafish. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2020, 1864, 129634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  262. Strungaru, S.A.; Robea, M.A.; Plavan, G.; Todirascu-Ciornea, E.; Ciobica, A.; Nicoara, M. Acute Exposure to Methylmercury Chloride Induces Fast Changes in Swimming Performance, Cognitive Processes and Oxidative Stress of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) as Reference Model for Fish Community. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2018, 47, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  263. Lindberg, C.D.; Di Giulio, R.T. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and Hypoxia Exposures Result in Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Zebrafish. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 216, 105298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  264. Doganlar, O.; Doganlar, Z.B.; Muranll, F.D.G.; Guner, U. Genotoxic Effect and Carcinogenic Potential of a Mixture of As and Cd in Zebrafish at Permissible Maximum Contamination Levels for Drinking Water. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2016, 227, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  265. Wang, M.; Chan, L.L.; Si, M.; Hong, H.; Wang, D. Proteomic Analysis of Hepatic Tissue of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Experimentally Exposed to Chronic Microcystin-LR. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 113, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  266. Chen, Y.; Hu, X.; Sun, J.; Zhou, Q. Specific Nanotoxicity of Graphene Oxide during Zebrafish Embryogenesis. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  267. Zhuo, H.-Q.; Huang, L.; Huang, H.-Q.; Cai, Z. Effects of Chronic Tramadol Exposure on the Zebrafish Brain: A Proteomic Study. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 3351–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  268. Sasagawa, S.; Nishimura, Y.; Koiwa, J.; Nomoto, T.; Shintou, T.; Murakami, S.; Yuge, M.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawase, R.; Miyazaki, T.; et al. In Vivo Detection of Mitochondrial Dysfunction Induced by Clinical Drugs and Disease-Associated Genes Using a Novel Dye ZMJ214 in Zebrafish. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  269. Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Sun, H.; Dai, Y.; Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Tan, L.; Lou, X.; Shen, B. Precision Modeling of Mitochondrial Diseases in Zebrafish via DdCBE-Mediated MtDNA Base Editing. Cell Discov. 2021, 7, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  270. Arribat, Y.; Grepper, D.; Lagarrigue, S.; Richard, J.; Gachet, M.; Gut, P.; Amati, F. Mitochondria in Embryogenesis: An Organellogenesis Perspective. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  271. Wang, N.; Luo, Z.; Jin, M.; Sheng, W.; Wang, H.T.; Long, X.; Wu, Y.; Hu, P.; Xu, H.; Zhang, X. Exploration of Age-Related Mitochondrial Dysfunction and the Anti-Aging Effects of Resveratrol in Zebrafish Retina. Aging 2019, 11, 3117–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  272. Wong, H.T.C.; Lukasz, D.; Drerup, C.M.; Kindt, K.S. In Vivo Investigation of Mitochondria in Lateral Line Afferent Neurons and Hair Cells. Hear. Res. 2023, 431, 108740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  273. Kim, M.J.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, C.H.; Choi, S.Y. Real-Time Imaging of Mitochondria in Transgenic Zebrafish Expressing Mitochondrially Targeted GFP. Biotechniques 2008, 45, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  274. Prokisch, H.; Scharfe, C.; Camp, D.G., 2nd; Xiao, W.; David, L.; Andreoli, C.; Monroe, M.E.; Moore, R.J.; Gritsenko, M.A.; Kozany, C.; et al. Integrative analysis of the mitochondrial proteome in yeast. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, e160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  275. Dancy, B.M.; Sedensky, M.M.; Morgan, P.G. Effects of the mitochondrial respiratory chain on longevity in C. elegans. Exp. Gerontol. 2014, 56, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  276. Byrnes, J.; Ganetzky, R.; Lightfoot, R.; Tzeng, M.; Nakamaru-Ogiso, E.; Seiler, C.; Falk, M.J. Pharmacologic modeling of primary mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction in zebrafish. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 117, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  277. Contamine, V.; Picard, M. Maintenance and integrity of the mitochondrial genome: A plethora of nuclear genes in the budding yeast. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 281–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  278. Tsang, W.Y.; Lemire, B.D. Mitochondrial genome content is regulated during nematode development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 291, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  279. Haag-Liautard, C.; Coffey, N.; Houle, D.; Lynch, M.; Charlesworth, B.; Keightley, P.D. Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  280. Artuso, L.; Romano, A.; Verri, T.; Domenichini, A.; Argenton, F.; Santorelli, F.M.; Petruzzella, V. Mitochondrial DNA metabolism in early development of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1817, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  281. Sesaki, H.; Jensen, R.E. Division versus fusion: Dnm1p and Fzo1p antagonistically regulate mitochondrial shape. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  282. Woods, L.C.; Berbusse, G.W.; Naylor, K. Microtubules Are Essential for Mitochondrial Dynamics-Fission, Fusion, and Motility-in Dictyostelium discoideum. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  283. Labrousse, A.M.; Zappaterra, M.D.; Rube, D.A.; van der Bliek, A.M. C. elegans dynamin-related protein DRP-1 controls severing of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Mol. Cell. 1999, 4, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  284. Poole, A.C.; Thomas, R.E.; Andrews, L.A.; McBride, H.M.; Whitworth, A.J.; Pallanck, L.J. The PINK1/Parkin pathway regulates mitochondrial morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 105, 1638–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  285. Rahn, J.J.; Stackley, K.D.; Chan, S.S. Opa1 is required for proper mitochondrial metabolism in early development. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  286. Kanki, T.; Wang, K.; Cao, Y.; Baba, M.; Klionsky, D.J. Atg32 is a mitochondrial protein that confers selectivity during mitophagy. Dev. Cell. 2009, 17, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  287. Flinn, L.J.; Keatinge, M.; Bretaud, S.; Mortiboys, H.; Matsui, H.; De Felice, E.; Woodroof, H.I.; Brown, L.; McTighe, A.; Soellner, R.; et al. TigarB causes mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal loss in PINK1 deficiency. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  288. Jamieson, D.J. Oxidative stress responses of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14, 1511–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Park, S.O.; Kim, H.L.; Lee, S.W.; Park, Y.S. Tetrahydropteridines possess antioxidant roles to guard against glucose-induced oxidative stress in Dictyostelium discoideum. BMB Rep. 2013, 46, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  290. Honda, Y.; Honda, S. The daf-2 gene network for longevity regulates oxidative stress resistance and Mn-superoxide dismutase gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  291. Owusu-Ansah, E.; Banerjee, U. Reactive oxygen species prime Drosophila haematopoietic progenitors for differentiation. Nature 2009, 461, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  292. Wu, M.; Xu, H.; Shen, Y.; Qiu, W.; Yang, M. Oxidative stress in zebrafish embryos induced by short-term exposure to bisphenol A, nonylphenol, and their mixture. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011, 30, 2335–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  293. Solieri, L. Mitochondrial inheritance in budding yeasts: Towards an integrated understanding. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  294. Sure, G.R.; Chatterjee, A.; Mishra, N.; Sabharwal, V.; Devireddy, S.; Awasthi, A.; Mohan, S.; Koushika, S.P. UNC-16/JIP3 and UNC-76/FEZ1 limit the density of mitochondria in C. elegans neurons by maintaining the balance of anterograde and retrograde mitochondrial transport. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  295. Stowers, R.S.; Megeath, L.J.; Górska-Andrzejak, J.; Meinertzhagen, I.A.; Schwarz, T.L. Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends on milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron 2002, 36, 1063–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  296. Lang, A.E.; Stein, C.; Schultz, R.; Drerup, C.M. Retrograde mitochondrial transport is required for mitochondrial biogenesis in zebrafish neurons. Nat. Commun. 2026; in press. [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  297. Rawson, R.L.; Yam, L.; Weimer, R.M.; Bend, E.G.; Hartwieg, E.; Horvitz, H.R.; Clark, S.G.; Jorgensen, E.M. Axons degenerate in the absence of mitochondria in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  298. Verstreken, P.; Ly, C.V.; Venken, K.J.; Koh, T.W.; Zhou, Y.; Bellen, H.J. Synaptic mitochondria are critical for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Neuron. 2005, 47, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  299. Cosson, P.; Soldati, T. Eat, kill or die: When amoeba meets bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  300. Pukkila-Worley, R.; Ausubel, F.M. Immune defense mechanisms in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestinal epithelium. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  301. Lemaitre, B.; Hoffmann, J. The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 25, 697–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  302. Meijer, A.H.; Spaink, H.P. Host-pathogen interactions made transparent with the zebrafish model. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 1000–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. D. rerio as a model for CNS and mitochondria research.
Figure 1. D. rerio as a model for CNS and mitochondria research.
Biomolecules 16 01072 g001
Table 1. Selected S. cerevisiae models of CNS disorders with mitochondrial malfunction.
Table 1. Selected S. cerevisiae models of CNS disorders with mitochondrial malfunction.
Model forModel DescriptionKey FindingsReferences
HDExpression of huntingtin fragments containing flanking polyQ regionsDefective mitochondrial transport, dynamic imbalances, modulated conversion of benign to toxic protein aggregates[21,24]
PDInducible expression of α-synuclein fused to GFP (galactose-regulated), expression of mitochondrial Hsp70 variants (P509S, R126W)Impaired ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking leads to mitochondrial stress; enhanced interaction and activation of the mutated mtHsp70 variant with mitochondrial J-proteins, protein instability, increased intracellular protein aggregation[26,32]
ALSExpression of human mutant SOD1 variants replacing the native yeast ortholog (sod1Δ)Disrupted protein stability and conformation due to altered acetylation/amino acid modifications, possible impaired antioxidant protection in the mitochondrial intermembrane space where SOD1 also localizes in addition to the cytoplasm[25,33,34]
LSExpression of novel single-point OPA1 mutations or splice variants in the ATP5PO geneValidation of disease-associated mitochondrial pathogenicity and structural defects[35,36]
Ataxia, NARP, and MILSModels harboring point mutations in the ATP6 gene (MT-ATP6 ortholog)Severe impairment of ATP synthase function leading to downstream reduction in Complex IV levels[37,38,39,40]
ALS—Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; HD—Huntington’s disease; LS—Leigh syndrome; MILS—maternally inherited Leigh syndrome; NARP—neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa; PD—Parkinson’s disease.
Table 2. D. discoideum as a model for primary mitochondrial dysfunction and PD.
Table 2. D. discoideum as a model for primary mitochondrial dysfunction and PD.
Model forModel DescriptionKey FindingsReferences
Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by incorrect folding and assembly of mitochondrial proteinsReduced expression of chaperonin 60 (Cpn60)KO is lethal, the KD phenotype is consistent with respiratory dysfunction (severe defects in slug phototaxis and thermotaxis, growth defects not due to impaired phagocytosis or macropinocytosis, impaired development), chronic
activation of AMPK is responsible for the phenotype
[65,66,83]
Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by CI deficiencyDeficiency of MidA (Ndufaf7)The KO phenotype is not fully consistent with mitochondrial dysfunction (severely reduced growth on bacterial lawns but only moderately reduced axenic growth, reduced phagocytosis and macropinocytosis, developmental defects with reduced viability of spores, strong defect in slug phototaxis and thermotaxis), reduced ATP levels, a 50% reduction in CI activity, partially dependent on AMPK activation[68,84,85]
PDReduced expression and overexpression of wild type and protease-dead mutant of HtrA2KD and OE of the protease-dead mutant have the same phenotype, which is not fully consistent with mitochondrial dysfunction (reduced growth on bacterial lawns, mildly reduced axenic growth, aberrant fruiting body morphology, no defect in slug phototaxis), no respiratory defects, OE of wild type protein is lethal due to high protease activity[79,86,87]
PDDeficiency and
increased kinase activity of Roco4
KO and increased kinase activity (conserved PD mutation): severe developmental defects, strong defect in slug phototaxis associated with mitochondrial dysfunction; KO: increased basal respiration, ATP synthesis and CI activity; increased kinase activity: reduced basal and maximal respiration[75,78,88]
CI—Complex I; KD—knockdown; KO—knockout; OE—overexpression; PD—Parkinson’s disease.
Table 3. Selected C. elegans models of CNS disorders and mitochondrial phenotypes.
Table 3. Selected C. elegans models of CNS disorders and mitochondrial phenotypes.
Model forModel DescriptionKey FindingsReferences
PDα-synuclein expression; pink-1 or pdr-1 mutantsFragmented mitochondria, impaired mitophagy, respiration defects, excessive ROS production, dopaminergic neuron loss[112,139]
ADNeuronal Aβ or tau expressionATP depletion, increased ROS, mitochondrial fragmentation, disrupted calcium homeostasis, synaptic failure, neuronal dysfunction, phenotypes mitigated by UPRmt activation and HSP-6 and HSP-60 upregulation[140,141,142]
HDPolyQ expansion modelsDefective mitochondrial transport, altered fission–fusion balance, impaired respiratory capacity, elevated ROS levels in GABAergic and cholinergic neurons, behavioral and locomotor impairments [143,144,145]
ALSMutant SOD1 or TDP-43 expressionImpaired mitochondrial transport along axons, accumulation of oxidatively damaged mitochondria, oxidative stress, defective mitophagy, impaired axonal transport, motor neuron degeneration[125,146]
LSReduced mma-1 (LRPPRC) functionMitochondrial hyperfusion, decreased activity of complex IV of the electron transport chain[147]
FRDAFrataxin homolog (frh-1) knockdown or deletion mutants; RNAi-mediated frataxin suppressionReduced mitochondrial respiration, mitochondrial iron accumulation, defective Fe–S cluster biogenesis, elevated ROS levels, impaired ATP production, neuronal degeneration, locomotor dysfunction[148]
POLG-related mtDNA maintenance disorderspolg-1 deficiency or mutant polg-1 modelsmtDNA depletion or accumulation of mtDNA mutations, impaired mitochondrial genome maintenance, reduced mitochondrial function, shortened lifespan, sterility and organismal dysfunction[149,150,151]
ALS—Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FRDA—Friedreich’s ataxia; HD—Huntington’s disease; LS—Leigh syndrome; mtDNA—mitochondrial DNA; PD—Parkinson’s disease; POLG—mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ catalytic subunit.
Table 4. Key studies in D. melanogaster on mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders.
Table 4. Key studies in D. melanogaster on mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS disorders.
Model forModel DescriptionKey FindingsReferences
PDPink1 mutantsSevere mitochondrial fragmentation and swelling, disrupted cristae, impaired mitochondrial function, defective mitochondrial quality control and mitophagy, dopaminergic neuron degeneration, locomotor defects[185]
PDPink1/Parkin
pathway
PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to damaged mitochondria activates mitophagy, conserved mitochondrial quality control pathway in vivo[190]
PDPink1/Parkin with ref(2)P mutantsDefective mitophagy due to impaired autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria, persistent mitochondrial dysfunction[211]
PD/AgingAging fly tissues with Pink1/Parkin deficiencyAge-dependent decline in mitophagy, accumulation of damaged mitochondria, impaired mitochondrial turnover, progressive tissue and neuronal dysfunction[212]
ADNeuronal Aβ42
expression
Impaired mitochondrial transport, depletion of mitochondria from axons and dendrites and accumulation in neuronal soma, preceding neuronal dysfunction[213]
ADAβ42 expressionDisrupted mitochondrial homeostasis associated with impaired autophagy/mitophagy, accumulation of autophagic vesicles, age-dependent neuronal dysfunction[214]
HDMutant huntingtin expressionImpaired mitochondrial axonal transport, disrupted mitochondrial dynamics and fission–fusion balance, bioenergetic defects, synaptic dysfunction[215]
HDDrosophila HD
models
Genetic restoration of mitochondrial function, including Parkin activation rescues mitochondrial defects and improves neuronal and muscle phenotypes[216]
ALS/FTDTDP-43 overexpression or mutationsAltered mitochondrial dynamics and distribution, impaired mitochondrial function, mitochondrial contribution to neurodegeneration and neuronal loss[217]
ALSSod1 mutantEarly compartment-specific mitochondrial dysfunction preceding overt symptoms and contributing to motor neuron vulnerability[218]
AddictionSingle-dose ethanol
exposure
Altered mitochondrial trafficking required for reward memory formation, disruption of mitochondrial transport abolishes ethanol-induced reward behavior[219]
AD—Alzheimer’s disease; ALS—Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FTD—Frontotemporal Dementia; PD—Parkinson’s disease.
Table 5. Selected D. rerio models for mitochondrial and CNS-related disorders.
Table 5. Selected D. rerio models for mitochondrial and CNS-related disorders.
Model forModel DescriptionKey Mitochondrial FindingsReferences
PDNeurotoxin-based models using MPTP or 6-OHDA; genetic models involving pink1, Parkin, DJ-1, and LRRK2-associated pathwaysVulnerability to oxidative stress, upregulation of genes associated with OXPHOS, dopaminergic neuron loss, altered motor behavior, mitochondrial-associated PD phenotypes[229,230,231]
ALSMutant sod1 zebrafish; c9orf72 loss-of-function modelMotor-neuron degeneration, NMJ disruption, mitochondrial vacuolation, impaired synaptic vesicle release, TDP-43 mislocalization, locomotor impairment[232,233]
ADAβ42 injection, okadaic acid exposure, human mutant APP (APPswe) transgenic zebrafish, Tau-P301L transgenic lineCognitive impairment, increased tau phosphorylation and aggregation, Aβ accumulation, neuronal death, enlarged perivascular spaces, axonal degeneration[234,235,236,237,238]
Complex I dysfunctionHuman NDUFB7-related mitochondrial disease modeled using ndufb7-deficient zebrafishLactic acidosis, brain malformation, reduced neuronal volume, mitochondrial dysfunction[255]
LS
MELAS
Knockdown or mutation of mitochondrial genes including tfam, opa1, surf1, mfn2, and slc25a1ROS overproduction, mitochondrial dysfunction, severe developmental abnormalities affecting the eye, heart, and brain[229]
MADDZebrafish models compared with human MADD mechanismsMetabolic and neural defects associated with impaired mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation and mitochondrial dysfunction[249]
CMTmfn2, slc25a1, kbp, kif1b, and actr10 modelsDefective mitochondrial transport, reduced motile mitochondria, accumulation of mitochondria, abnormal motor neurons, impaired neuromuscular transmission, NMJ pathology[229,251,256,257,258]
POLG-related mitochondrial diseasepolg−/− TALEN, polg antisense/CRISPR, polg2 mutant line (polg2ia304) modelsmtDNA depletion, altered mitochondrial network and dynamics, reduced mitochondrial respiration, impaired growth and regeneration[252,253,254]
AD—Alzheimer’s disease; ALS—Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMT—Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease; LS—Leigh syndrome; MADD—multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; MELAS—mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes; MPTP-1—methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; mtDNA—mitochondrial DNA; NMJ—neuromuscular junction; PD—Parkinson’s disease; POLG—mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ catalytic subunit; 6-OHDA—6-hydroxydopamine.
Table 6. Key features, advantages, limitations, translational relevance, and applications of non-mammalian models in mitochondrial and CNS research.
Table 6. Key features, advantages, limitations, translational relevance, and applications of non-mammalian models in mitochondrial and CNS research.
Model
Organism
Key
Characteristics
AdvantagesLimitationsCNS Disease
Investigated
Translational RelevanceResearch
Applications
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
Single-celled eukaryote; highly conserved mitochondrial genome and pathways; no nervous systemRapid growth; low cost; powerful genetic manipulation; high-throughput screening; well-characterized mitochondrial biochemistry, allows study of mitochondrial defects (loss of OXPHOS) incompatible with higher organisms No neurons; no nervous system; cannot model neuronal circuits, behavior or neuroinflammation; lack of cell–cell interactions; limited disease phenotypingPD (α-synuclein toxicity, PINK1/Parkin pathways); AD (Aβ and tau toxicity studies); HD (polyQ toxicity); ALS (TDP-43 and FUS toxicity); mitochondrial encephalopathies (OXPHOS defects); POLG-related mitochondrial diseaseIdentifies conserved cellular mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration, but requires validation in neuronal modelsMitochondrial biogenesis; OXPHOS; mtDNA maintenance; protein import and folding; mitophagy; oxidative stress; pathogenic variant testing; drug-target identification
Dictyostelium
discoideum
Social amoeba; unicellular organism with multicellular developmental stages; conserved mitochondrial quality-control pathwaysIntermediate complexity between yeast and animals; Easy genetic manipulation; suitable for studying autophagy, mitophagy, and stress responsesNo nervous system; limited disease-specific phenotypesPD (PINK1, Parkin, LRRK2 studies); HD (mutant huntingtin toxicity); rare mitochondrial disorders affecting energy metabolismUseful for dissecting evolutionarily conserved mitochondrial and lysosomal pathways relevant to neurodegenerationMitophagy; mitochondrial dynamics; autophagy; oxidative stress; lysosomal–mitochondrial interactions
Caenorhabditis
elegans
Multicellular nematode; 302 neurons; transparent body; conserved mitochondrial pathways and aging mechanismsFully mapped nervous system; live imaging; RNA interference; short lifespan enables aging studies; easy generation of transgenic lines; robust neurodegeneration modelsSimple nervous system lacking mammalian brain complexity and regions and vertebrate immune interactions PD (PINK1, Parkin, DJ-1); AD; ALS; HD; FRDA; LS; CMT; mitochondrial complex I deficiency; age-related neurodegeneration; POLG-related mitochondrial disease Model for conserved pathways linking mitochondrial dysfunction to neuronal degeneration and behaviorAging; mitochondrial transport; proteostasis, neurodegeneration; behavioral phenotyping; drug screening; stress-response
Drosophila
melanogaster
Multicellular animal, invertebrate; complex brain structures; conserved mitochondrial genes and neurotransmitter systems; sophisticated genetic toolsCell-specific gene manipulation; behavioral phenotyping; rapid generation time; models neuronal degeneration and locomotor defects; high-throughput genetic screensLacks mammalian brain complexity and architecture; no adaptive immune system; differences in metabolism and drug processingPD (PINK1, Parkin, DJ-1, LRRK2); AD; ALS; HD; FTD; LS; mitochondrial encephalomyopathies; optic neuropathies; POLG-related mitochondrial diseaseHighly informative for mechanisms linking mitochondrial dysfunction to neuronal degeneration and behaviorMitochondrial dynamics; neuronal energy metabolism; synaptic dysfunction; genetic modifier screens; neurodegeneration mechanisms; behavioral phenotyping; therapeutic testing
Danio
rerio
Vertebrate with conserved CNS organization, transparent embryos, and human-like mitochondrial geneticsVertebrate nervous system; rapid development; live imaging of neurons and mitochondria, CRISPR editing, high-throughput drug screeningLower CNS complexity than mammals; some physiological differencesPD; AD; ALS; HD; LS; MELAS; mitochondrial complex I and IV deficiencies; optic neuropathies; neurodevelopmental disorders; POLG-related mitochondrial diseaseStrong bridge between invertebrate and mammalian models; allows visualization of CNS pathology in vivo; models disease phenotypesMitochondrial encephalopathies, neurodevelopmental disorders, neuronal survival, mitochondrial trafficking, drug discovery; precision genetic models
AD—Alzheimer’s disease; ALS—Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FRDA-Friedreich’s ataxia; FTD—Frontotemporal Dementia; LS—Leigh syndrome; MELAS—mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes; mtDNA—mitochondrial DNA; PD—Parkinson’s disease; POLG—DNA polymerase γ catalytic subunit.
Table 7. Conservation of key biological processes across non-mammalian model organisms.
Table 7. Conservation of key biological processes across non-mammalian model organisms.
Biological
Process
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeDictyostelium
discoideum
Caenorhabditis elegansDrosophila
melanogaster
Danio
rerio
OXPHOSHigh—Conserved respiratory chain; lacks Complex I [274].Moderate–High—Conserved mitochondrial respiratory pathways [42].High—Conserved mitochondrial respiration [275].High—Conserved mitochondrial bioenergetics [193].High—Models mitochondrial respiratory defects [276].
mtDNA
maintenance
High—Conserved genome inheritance/stability [277].Moderate—Genome organization conserved; mechanisms less defined [42].High—Developmental regulation of mtDNA [278].High—Conserved mtDNA maintenance [279].High—Conserved mtDNA metabolism [280].
Mitochondrial
dynamics
High—Dnm1p fission/Fzo1p fusion [281].Moderate–High—Conserved fission/fusion pathways [282].High—DRP-1-dependent fission [283].High—PINK1/Parkin regulates morphology [284].High—Conserved mitochondrial fusion/fission pathways [285].
Mitophagy/
mitochondrial quality control
Moderate—Atg32-dependent mitophagy; no PINK1/Parkin [286].Low–Moderate—Autophagy conserved; selective mitophagy less defined [55].High—PINK-1/PDR-1 quality control [135].High—PINK1/Parkin pathway conserved [284].High—Conserved PINK1-dependent mitochondrial quality control [287].
ROS signaling/oxidative stressHigh—Conserved stress responses [288].Moderate—Conserved ROS responses and antioxidant mechanisms [289].High—Oxidative stress resistance pathways [290].High—ROS regulates stress responses [291].High—ROS responses and antioxidant pathways conserved [292].
Mitochondrial transportLow—Mitochondrial inheritance during budding [293].Moderate—Microtubule-dependent mitochondrial motility [282].High—Neuronal mitochondrial transport [294].High—Milton-dependent transport [295].High—Axonal mitochondrial transport in vivo [296].
Synaptic
mitochondrial function
N/A—No nervous system.N/A—No nervous system.Moderate—Neuronal mitochondrial function [297].High—Synaptic mitochondria regulate neurotransmission [298].Moderate–High—Mitochondrial function supports neuronal survival [287].
Neuroimmune/immune responsesN/A—No nervous or immune system.Low–Moderate—Phagocytosis and innate immunity-like responses [299].Moderate—Innate immunity conserved [300].Moderate—Toll-mediated immunity conserved [301].High—Innate and adaptive immunity conserved [302].
High—core conserved mitochondrial processes; Moderate—conserved but lineage-specific differences; Low—limited homology or major functional divergence; N/A—not applicable, absent biological system; mtDNA—mitochondrial DNA; OXPHOS—oxidative phosphorylation; ROS—reactive oxygen species.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Svob Strac, D.; Filic, V.; Filosevic Vujnovic, A.; Vrhovac Madunic, I.; Madunic, J.; Cipak Gasparovic, A.; Havelka Mestrovic, A.; Andretic Waldowski, R. Non-Mammalian Models for Mitochondria Research in CNS Disorders. Biomolecules 2026, 16, 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16071072

AMA Style

Svob Strac D, Filic V, Filosevic Vujnovic A, Vrhovac Madunic I, Madunic J, Cipak Gasparovic A, Havelka Mestrovic A, Andretic Waldowski R. Non-Mammalian Models for Mitochondria Research in CNS Disorders. Biomolecules. 2026; 16(7):1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16071072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Svob Strac, Dubravka, Vedrana Filic, Ana Filosevic Vujnovic, Ivana Vrhovac Madunic, Josip Madunic, Ana Cipak Gasparovic, Ana Havelka Mestrovic, and Rozi Andretic Waldowski. 2026. "Non-Mammalian Models for Mitochondria Research in CNS Disorders" Biomolecules 16, no. 7: 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16071072

APA Style

Svob Strac, D., Filic, V., Filosevic Vujnovic, A., Vrhovac Madunic, I., Madunic, J., Cipak Gasparovic, A., Havelka Mestrovic, A., & Andretic Waldowski, R. (2026). Non-Mammalian Models for Mitochondria Research in CNS Disorders. Biomolecules, 16(7), 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16071072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop