Proteoglycans as Molecular Regulators of Bone Metastasis: Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Tumor–Bone Crosstalk, Dormancy, and Therapeutic Opportunities

Background: Bone metastasis is a frequent and debilitating complication of advanced cancer, particularly in breast and prostate cancer, and is driven by complex interactions among tumor cells, bone-resident cells, immune populations, vascular components, and the extracellular matrix. Within this specialized microenvironment, proteoglycans have emerged as key molecular regulators of tumor–bone crosstalk, matrix remodeling, metastatic niche formation, dormancy, and therapeutic resistance. Methods: We conducted a narrative review using targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published through 31 May 2026. Search terms included combinations of proteoglycan- and glycosaminoglycan-related concepts, including “proteoglycans,” “glycosaminoglycans,” “heparan sulfate proteoglycans,” “hyaluronan,” “heparanase,” “syndecans,” “glypicans,” “perlecan/HSPG2,” “versican,” and “decorin,” with disease- and process-related terms such as “bone metastasis,” “extracellular matrix,” “tumor–bone crosstalk,” “breast cancer,” “prostate cancer,” “metastatic niche,” “osteolytic metastasis,” “osteoblastic metastasis,” “dormancy,” “reactivation,” “immune regulation,” and “therapy resistance.” Original studies, reviews, and translational reports were selected according to their relevance to cell-surface, pericellular, and extracellular proteoglycans in bone metastatic progression. Results: Proteoglycans and associated GAG/ECM axes are implicated in multiple processes involved in skeletal metastasis, including growth factor availability, extracellular matrix organization, osteolytic and osteoblastic niche formation, angiogenesis, immune evasion, metastatic dormancy, reactivation, and therapy resistance. These functions are highly context-dependent and are influenced by proteoglycan localization, core protein structure, glycosaminoglycan composition, sulfation patterns, proteolytic processing, and cellular source. Conclusions: Proteoglycans represent critical molecular nodes in the bone metastatic microenvironment and hold potential as biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and tools for stratifying metastatic niche heterogeneity. Their clinical translation will require validation in human bone metastasis samples, improved models that reproduce the mineralized and immune-rich bone niche, and a clearer distinction between causal mechanisms and correlative associations. Future studies should integrate matrisome profiling, spatial proteomics, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, glycosaminoglycan omics, degradomics, and three-dimensional bone niche models to define actionable proteoglycan-dependent mechanisms and improve therapeutic targeting of metastatic bone disease.