In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 4 as published. One of the images originally included in Figure 4 for the PRE 1 µg/mL and Zn (II) 0.1 mM experimental condition was included in error, as it is a duplicate of another image correctly included in this Figure for the PRE 0.1 µg/mL and Zn (II) 0.1 mM experimental condition. The corrected Figure 4 appears below.
Figure 4.
Representative time-lapse microscopy images of gingival fibroblast migration and wound repopulation at 48 h, following treatment with PRE and punicalagin (0.1–10 μg/mL) alone and with 0.1 mM Zn (II), White dashed lines show original scratch wounds at 0 h. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Affiliation 3 was also updated to the correct format, “Melbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Celiksoy, V.; Moses, R.L.; Sloan, A.J.; Moseley, R.; Heard, C.M. Evaluation of the In Vitro Oral Wound Healing Effects of Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Rind Extract and Punicalagin, in Combination with Zn (II). Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.