Next Article in Journal
Obesogenic Inflammatory Memory: A New Concept Related to the Dangerous Effects of Weight Cycling
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemicals Possess Selective Chemopreventive Mechanisms That Safeguard Human Cells from Oxidative Toxicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis of Bread Wheat MicroRNAs in Response to Zinc Availability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wheat Class I TCP Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Positively Regulates Cutin and Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis

College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2026, 16(2), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16020192
Submission received: 20 December 2025 / Revised: 16 January 2026 / Accepted: 23 January 2026 / Published: 27 January 2026

Abstract

Cutin matrices and wax mixtures are major components of lipophilic cuticles, shielding plant tissues from stressful environments. Identifying the key regulators governing biosynthesis of cutin and cuticular wax in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) could contribute to wheat breeding for stress resistance. In this study, we reported that the wheat class I TCP transcription factor TaTCP15 positively regulates cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis. The CYP86A family cytochrome P450 enzymes, TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4, were characterized as essential components of wheat cutin biosynthetic machinery. Wheat transcription factor TaSHN1 targets TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR and recruits the mediator subunit TaCDK8 to activate these genes’ transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TaSHN1 gene transcription is directly activated by the transcription factor TaTCP15. Expression of TaSHN1, TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes, as well as cutin and wax accumulation, was attenuated by silencing of the TaTCP15 gene. Collectively, these findings suggest that wheat class I TCP transcription factor TaTCP15 positively regulates cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis, probably via directly targeting the TaSHN1 gene and upregulating TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR expression, providing valuable information for developing wheat plants with improved cuticle-associated traits.

1. Introduction

During the transition from aquatic to terrestrial habitats, early land plants acquired a hydrophobic skin, the cuticle, to shield plant tissues from desiccation [1]. The lipophilic cuticle not only covers the aboveground organs, like leaves, fruits, flowers, and nonwoody stems, but also temporally coats the underground root tips [2]. As an evolutionary innovation, the waxy cuticle mainly functions as a barrier to restrict plant non-stomatal water loss, screen ultraviolet (UV) radiation, attenuate mechanical damage, impair gas exchanges and heat transference between plant tissues and surrounding environments, and protect plant tissues from pathogen infections and pest infestations [3,4,5,6]. A plethora of developmental processes, such as organ separation, seedling establishment, and lateral root formation, are also affected by the cuticle [7]. Cutin matrices and wax mixtures are two major lipophilic components of the cuticle. As an organic solvent-insoluble fraction, cutin consists of crosslinked polyesters of oxygenated C16 and C18 fatty acids, like ω-hydroxy fatty acids (FAs), polyhydroxy FAs, and dicarboxylic acids [8]. In contrast, cuticular waxes are organic solvent-extractable and predominantly composed of very long-chain (VLC, ≥C20) fatty acids and derivatives, including VLC alcohols, alkanes, aldehydes, ketones, and alkyl esters [9,10].
As described by prior reviews, biosynthesis of plant cutin and wax is extensively studied in the dicot model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [11]. For cutin biosynthesis, C16 and C18 fatty acyl-CoAs generated by long-chain acyl-coenzyme A synthases (LACS) undergo oxidation and acyl transfer reactions catalyzed by CYP86A and CYP77A family cytochrome P450 enzymes, the HOTHEAD protein, and glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) acyltransferase (GPAT) enzymes to form the cutin precursors monoacylglycerols (MAGs) [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. For cuticular wax biosynthesis, these C16 and C18 fatty acyl-CoAs are modified by fatty acid elongase (FAE) enzymes to generate elongated VLC acyl-CoAs [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Cuticular wax components are concerted from VLC acyl-CoAs via the alkane-forming pathway and alcohol-forming pathway [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. These synthesized wax components and cutin precursors are then exported to the extracellular cuticular region [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. However, the mechanism underlying cutin and wax biosynthesis in agronomically important crops like bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) remains poorly understood.
In this study, we reported that the wheat class I TCP transcription factor TaTCP15 directly activates transcription of TaSHN1, a transcriptional activator gene of wheat cutin and wax biosynthesis, thereby positively regulating wheat cuticle biosynthesis. Cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR were identified as target genes of TaSHN1. This study revealed a novel regulatory mechanism underlying wheat cuticle biosynthesis and provided valuable information for developing wheat plants with improved cuticle-associated traits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

After surface disinfection, as described in [47], seeds of winter wheat cultivar Yannong 999 were germinated in glass dishes containing sterile Hoagland solution, and seedlings were cultivated in climate chambers under a 16 h light/8 h dark, 20 °C/18 °C day/night cycle.

2.2. Accession Numbers

Sequence data of the genes identified in this research can be found under accession numbers TaCYP86A4-2A (TraesCS2A02G407500), TaCYP86A4-2B (TraesCS2B02G425400), TaCYP86A4-2D (TraesCS2D02G404600), TaTCP15-6A (TraesCS6A02G306500), TaTCP15-6B (TraesCS6B02G334900), and TaTCP15-6D (TraesCS6D02G285600).

2.3. Gene Silencing Assay

A barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) assay was conducted to silence TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, TaECR, TaSHN1, TaCDK8, or TaTCP15 genes encoding TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, TaECR, TaSHN1, TaCDK8, or TaTCP15 proteins. Briefly, antisense (as) fragments from the coding regions of TaCYP86A4 and TaTCP15 genes were amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 and cloned into the pCa-γbLIC vector to generate BSMV-TaCYP86A4as and BSMV-TaTCP15as constructs. Constructs BSMV-TaCYP86A2as, BSMV-TaECRas, BSMV-TaSHN1as, and BSMV-TaCDK8as were derived from previous studies [48,49,50]. BSMV-VIGS assays were performed as previously described [51].

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis

RT-qPCR assays were performed to analyze the expression levels of TaCYP86A2, TaECR, TaSHN1, TaCDK8, or TaTCP15 gene using the ABI step-one real-time PCR system. Accumulation of TaCYP86A2, TaECR, TaSHN1, TaCDK8, or TaTCP15 transcripts was analyzed using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1, and the geometric mean of two housekeeping genes, TaACTIN and TaGADPH, was employed for RT-qPCR analysis.

2.5. Transcriptional Activation Analysis

For transcriptional activation analysis, TaSHN1, TaCDK8, and TaTCP15 coding regions were amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 and cloned into the vector pIPKb004. Wild-type and mutant versions of TaCYP86A2, TaECR, and TaSHN1 promoters were ligated into the vector 5XGAL4-LUC; 5XGAL4-LUC (Addgene, #24343) was described by Potter et al. [52]. For wheat protoplast preparation, 7-day-old wheat leaves were harvested and digested in a Cellulase and Macerozyme solution for 6 h. After washing three times with W5 solution containing 150 mM NaCl, 120 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, and 2 mM MES, wheat protoplasts were kept in MMG solution containing 0.4 M mannitol, 15 mM MgCl2, and 4 mM MES, pH 5.7, on ice for transformation with reporter and effector constructs. Wheat protoplast transfection was conducted as described in [50].

2.6. Cuticular Lipid Composition Analysis

The cuticular lipid composition analysis was performed as described in [14,53]. Wheat leaves were delipidated by chloroform (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA), and the wax lipid extracts were derivatized and analyzed by capillary gas chromatography (GC) and a flame ionization detector (FID) with a mass spectrometer. For the cutin composition analysis, delipidated wheat leaf samples were depolymerized, and the generated methyl esters were extracted with dichloromethane and subjected to GC analysis.

2.7. Wheat Leaf Cuticle Permeability Analysis

Rates of water loss and chlorophyll leaching were measured to analyze the cuticle permeability of wheat leaves in plants with the silenced genes, as described in [54,55]. For the water loss rate analysis, the weights of detached leaves were measured per hour for 12 h. For the chlorophyll leaching assay, the detached leaves were soaked in the 80% ethanol, and the chlorophyll concentration in the liquid was measured with a spectrophotometer every hour for 12 h.

2.8. Analyses of Protein Enrichment at Gene Promoter Regions

ChIP assays were performed to analyze the enrichment of TaSHN1, TaCDK8, and TaTCP15 proteins at promoter regions of their target genes TaCYP86A2, TaECR, and TaSHN1. The ChIP assays were carried out as described in [49,50]. DNA recovery from the ChIP assays was quantified as a percentage of input. qPCR was performed using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1, as described above.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Three technical replicates were analyzed per assay, and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates using separately prepared samples. Student’s t-test was performed to statistically compare two groups, whereas One-way ANOVA with Duncan’s post hoc test was conducted to analyze three or more groups.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 Genes Essential for Wheat Cutin Biosynthesis

Arabidopsis AtCYP86A2 and AtCYP86A4 are essential components of cutin biosynthetic machinery [19]. We first employed Arabidopsis AtCYP86A2 (At4g00360) and AtCYP86A4 (At1g01600), two essential components of cutin biosynthetic machinery, as queries to search the reference genome of allohexaploid bread wheat (data source: International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Assemblies (accessed on 1 July 2024) and identified TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 as the homologs of Arabidopsis AtCYP86A2 and AtCYP86A4 (Figure 1A). Three TaCYP86A2 genes, separately located on wheat chromosomes 6A, 6B, and 6D, were designated as TaCYP86A2-6A (TraesCS6A02G244900), TaCYP86A2-6B (TraesCS6B02G279400), and TaCYP86A2-6D (TraesCS6D02G227200). TaCYP86A4-2A (TraesCS2A02G407500), TaCYP86A4-2B (TraesCS2B02G425400), and TaCYP86A4-2D (TraesCS2D02G404600) were separately identified from wheat chromosomes 2A, 2B, and 2D. As shown in Figure 1B, the cytochrome P450 domain was identified from the central part of these six TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins.
To examine the regulation of wheat cutin biosynthesis by TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes, we separately silenced all endogenous TaCYP86A2 or TaCYP86A4 genes by BSMV-VIGS (Figure 1C). As shown in Figure 1D, single silencing of TaCYP86A2 or TaCYP86A4, or co-silencing TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4, resulted in a significant reduction in the cutin accumulation on the wheat leaves. Major cutin monomers, including 16-hydroxy-hexadecanoic acid (C16:0 ωHFA), 18-hydroxy-octadec-9-enoic acid (C18:1 ωHFA), 9,10-epoxy 18-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid (9,10-epoxy C18 ωHFA), 9(10), 16-dihydroxy-hexadecanoic acid (DHFA), and 9,10,18-trihydroxy-octadecanoic acid (THFA), all showed a significant reduction in the wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2 or/and TaCYP86A4 (Figure 1E). Measurement of the water loss rate and chlorophyll leaching confirmed that cuticle permeability was enhanced on the wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2 or/and TaCYP86A4 (Figure 1F,G). These results suggest that wheat TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins play key roles in wheat cutin biosynthesis.

3.2. Transcriptional Regulation of Cutin Biosynthesis Genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and Wax Biosynthesis Gene TaECR by Transcription Factor TaSHN1 and Mediator Subunit TaCDK8

Multiple GCC-box cis-elements were identified in the promoter regions of cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR (Figure 2A). As reported by Kong and Chang [49], TaSHN1-6A, TaSHN1-6B, and TaSHN1-6D proteins encoded by allelic TaSHN1 genes shared over 99% amino acid sequence identity; therefore, we chose TaSHN1-6A as a representative TaSHN1 in the following experiments. To analyze the potential enrichment of TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 proteins at TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters, we expressed TaSHN1-HA and TaCDK8-Myc proteins in wheat protoplasts and analyzed the distribution of TaSHN1-HA and TaCDK8-Myc at TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters by the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay (Figure 2A). As shown in Figure 2B, fragments of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters were observed to be co-immunoprecipitated with the TaSHN1-HA or TaCDK8-Myc protein, indicating that TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 associated with TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters in bread wheat. Notably, enrichment levels of TaCDK8-Myc at TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters were significantly reduced by knock-down of TaSHN1 genes, suggesting that transcription factor TaSHN1 could recruit mediator subunit TaCDK8 to the promoter regions of cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR (Figure 2B).
As demonstrated by Kong and Chang [49], TaSHN1 functions as a transcriptional activator. We next asked whether transcriptional activator TaSHN1 could directly trans-activate TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters. We performed the wheat leaf protoplast transfection assay, in which the LUC reporter gene, driven by TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters, was transfected with effector constructs over-expressing TaSHN1 proteins and a control plasmid. Wild-type promoter regions of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes harboring the cis-elements GCC-box, and TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoter mutants containing mutated GCC-box cis-elements, were employed. As shown in Figure 3A,B, expression of TaSHN1 resulted in a significant increase in the LUC activity obtained from LUC reporters containing wild-type TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters. In contrast, the LUC activity obtained from TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoter mutants containing mutated GCC-box cis-elements was not significantly affected by over-accumulated TaSHN1 proteins, suggesting that transcriptional activator TaSHN1 directly binds to the promoter regions of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes by recognizing the GCC-box cis-elements and stimulates their transcription (Figure 3A,B). Compared with the LUC activity obtained from the expression of TaSHN1, coexpression of TaSHN1 with wild-type TaCDK8 led to a further increase in the LUC activity obtained from the reporter gene driven by TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters to above 3.29, but coexpression of TaSHN1 with the TaCDK8(D176A) mutant with defective kinase activity failed to affect the LUC activity (Figure 4A). Consistent with this, silencing of TaSHN1 or TaCDK8 resulted in a significant reduction in the transcription rates and expression levels of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes (Figure 4B,C). Together, these results indicate that transcription factor TaSHN1 could recruit mediator kinase subunit TaCDK8 to activate transcription of cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR.

3.3. Identification of Transcription Factor TaTCP15 as a Transcriptional Regulator of the TaSHN1 Gene

Multiple TCP box cis-elements were identified from TaSHN1 promoter regions (Figure 5A). Arabidopsis class I TCP transcription factor AtTCP15 could recognize the TCP box cis-element and directly activate AtSHN1 transcription [50]. To analyze the potential enrichment of wheat TCP15 proteins at TaSHN1 promoters, we employed Arabidopsis AtTCP15 (At1g69690) as a query to search the wheat genome (data source: International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Assemblies) and identified TaTCP15-6A (TraesCS6A02G306500), TaTCP15-6B (TraesCS6B02G334900), and TaTCP15-6D (TraesCS6D02G285600) from wheat chromosomes 6A, 6B, and 6D. Considering that the predicted TaTCP15-6A, TaTCP15-6B, and TaTCP15-6D proteins shared above 95% amino acid sequence identity, TaTCP15-6A was selected as a representative TaTCP15 in the following experiments. We expressed TaTCP15-Myc in wheat protoplasts and performed a ChIP assay to characterize the potential occupancy of the TaTCP15-Myc protein at TaSHN1 promoters (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5B, TaSHN1 promoter fragments were found to be immunoprecipitated with the antibody against TaTCP15-Myc, indicating that transcription factor TaTCP15 enriches at the TCP box cis-element regions in TaSHN1 promoters in wheat cells.
As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, over-accumulation of DBD-TaTCP15 proteins resulted in a significant increase in LUC activity, suggesting that TaTCP15 functions as a transcriptional activator. We next asked whether transcriptional activator TaTCP15 could directly bind to TaSHN1 promoters and activate their transcription. In the wheat leaf protoplast transfection assay, LUC reporters containing promoter regions of TaSHN1-6A, TaSHN1-6B, or TaSHN1-6D genes were transfected with effectors construct over-expressing TaTCP15 proteins and a control plasmid. Wild-type promoter regions of TaSHN1-6A, TaSHN1-6B, or TaSHN1-6D genes harboring the TCP box cis-element, and TaSHN1-6A, TaSHN1-6B, or TaSHN1-6D promoter mutants containing mutated TCP box cis-elements, were employed. As shown in Figure 5C, over-accumulation of TaTCP15 proteins resulted in a significant increase in LUC activity in the LUC reporters containing wild-type TaSHN1 promoters but not in the LUC reporters harboring mutated TaSHN1 promoters, suggesting that TaTCP15 could directly bind to TaSHN1 promoters by recognizing the TCP box cis-element and activate their transcriptions (Figure 5C). As shown in Figure 5D, silencing the TaTCP15 gene resulted in a significant decrease in the transcription rates of the TaSHN1 gene. Consistent with this, accumulation levels of the TaSHN1 gene transcript decreased significantly in wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15, compared with BSMV-γ (Figure 5E). These results collectively suggested that transcriptional activator TaTCP15 could be enriched at TaSHN1 promoters by recognizing the TCP box cis-element and directly activating TaSHN1 transcription in wheat cells.

3.4. Functional Characterization of the TaTCP15 Gene in Cutin and Wax Biosynthesis

As shown in Figure 6A,B, silencing of the TaTCP15 gene resulted in a significant reduction in the transcription rates and expression levels of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes. GC-MS assay demonstrated that silencing of the TaTCP15 gene resulted in a significant reduction in the loads of total cutin monomers and cuticular wax in the wheat leaves (Figure 6C). Subsequent cutin monomer composition and wax constituent analyses revealed that cutin monomers and major wax constituents showed a significant reduction in the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15 (Figure 6D,E). Water loss rate and chlorophyll leaching analysis validated that cuticle permeability was enhanced on the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15 (Figure 6F,G). These results suggest that wheat transcriptional activator TaTCP15 stimulates the biosynthesis of cutin and cuticular wax, essential for the surface barrier property of cuticle.

4. Discussion

4.1. CYP86A Family Cytochrome P450 Enzyme TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 Proteins Show Partially Redundant Contributions to Wheat Cutin Biosynthesis

CYP86A family cytochrome P450 enzymes catalyze the oxidation reactions in the production of cutin monomers [19]. The Arabidopsis cyp86a2 mutant displayed a 70% reduction in total cutin loads, contributed by decreased accumulation of cutin monomer components 9-hydroxy pentadecanoic acid, 10(9)-hydroxy heptadecanoic acid, 16-hydroxy hexadecanoic acid, 10,16-dihydroxy hexadecanoic acid, hexadecane-1,16-dioic acid, 7-hydroxy hexadecane-1,16-dioic acid, and octadecane-1,18-dioic acid. Similarly, the Arabidopsis cyp86a4 mutant exhibited a 34% reduction in total cutin loads [19]. TaCYP86A2 was previously characterized as a core component of wheat cutin biosynthetic machinery, and silencing of the TaCYP86A2 gene resulted in reduced loads of cutin monomers [49]. However, the potential contribution of the CYP86A4 gene to wheat cutin biosynthesis remains unknown. Herein, we identified the wheat TaCYP86A4 gene as a homolog of the Arabidopsis AtCYP86A4 gene. The silencing of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes resulted in a reduction in total cutin loads to 45.2% and 57.4%, respectively, and simultaneously silencing all endogenous TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes resulted in a further reduction in total cutin loads to 22.6%. Notably, silencing of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes resulted in decreased loads of all cutin monomer components, including 16-hydroxy-hexadecanoic acid, 18-hydroxy-octadec-9-enoic acid, 9,10-epoxy 18-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid, 9(10), 16-dihydroxy-hexadecanoic acid, and 9,10,18-trihydroxy-octadecanoic acid, suggesting that TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins show partially redundant contributions to wheat cutin biosynthesis.

4.2. Wheat Transcription Factor TaSHN1 and Its Interactor Mediator Subunit TaCDK8 Directly Regulate Transcription of Cutin Biosynthesis Genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4

Wheat transcription factor TaSHN1 was previously identified as a key regulator of cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis [48]. The mediator kinase subunit TaCDK8 was demonstrated to interact with and phosphorylate TaSHN1 to potentiate biosynthesis of cutin and cuticular wax [48]. However, the wheat cuticle biosynthesis genes directly targeted by the TaCDK8-TaSHN1 module remain unknown. In this study, we employed ChIP-qPCR and the promoter activation assay to demonstrate that transcriptional activator TaSHN1 directly binds to promoter regions of cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR by recognizing the GCC-box cis-element. ChIP-qPCR and wheat protoplast transactivation assays further revealed that transcription factor TaSHN1 could recruit mediator kinase subunit TaCDK8 to activate transcription of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes. Notably, coexpression of TaSHN1 with wild-type TaCDK8, but not the TaCDK8(D176A) mutant with defective kinase activity, resulted in a further increase in the LUC activity obtained from the reporter gene driven by TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters in the wheat protoplast transactivation assay, suggesting that TaCDK8-mediated TaSHN1 phosphorylation might be essential for the transcriptional activation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes mediated by the TaCDK8-TaSHN1 module. These studies collectively suggested that wheat transcription factor TaSHN1 and its interactor mediator subunit TaCDK8 positively regulate cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis by activating cutin biosynthesis genes TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR. Previous studies revealed that transcription of TaCYP86A2 and TaECR genes could be regulated by Topoisomerase VI complex and SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex, respectively [49,50]. Therefore, it will be intriguing to examine the potential interplays among the TaCDK8-TaSHN1 module, Topoisomerase VI complex, and SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex in the transcriptional regulation of cuticle biosynthesis in future research.

4.3. Wheat TCP-Type Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Transactivates the TaSHN1 Gene and Stimulates Cutin and Wax Biosynthesis

The Arabidopsis AtSHN1 gene was previously demonstrated to be directly activated by the TCP transcription factor AtTCP15 [56]. However, the mechanism underlying the transcriptional regulation of the SHN1 gene in other plant species, especially in the agronomically important crop bread wheat, remains unknown. By employing the ChIP and wheat protoplast transactivation assay, we demonstrated that transcription factor TaTCP15 could bind to TaSHN1 promoters by recognizing the TCP box cis-element and directly activate TaSHN1 transcription. Reduced TaSHN1 expression and attenuated cutin and wax accumulation were observed in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat plant, confirming that the transcription factor TaTCP15 positively regulates cutin and wax biosynthesis, probably via transactivation of TaSHN1 genes. In the dicot model plant A. thaliana, expression of the AtSHN1 gene is directly activated by the TCP-type transcription factor AtTCP15. AtTCP15 gene loss-of-function plants tcp15-3 displayed increased cuticle permeability [50]. These studies suggested that transcriptional activation of SHN1 genes, as well as cutin biosynthesis by TCP15, might be conserved among the dicot model plant A. thaliana and monocot cereal crop bread wheat.
Although some of the genes we identified in wheat are homologs of Arabidopsis genes that have been previously characterized, our paper reported for the first time that the class 1 type transcription factor TaTCP15 stimulates wheat cutin and wax biosynthesis by activating transcription of the TaSHN1 gene. We firstly identified partially redundant TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins as key components of wheat cutin biosynthetic machinery and then elucidated that the transcription factor TaSHN1 recruits the mediator subunit TaCDK8 to activate transcription of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR. Finally, we demonstrated that TaTCP15 stimulates wheat cutin and wax biosynthesis by activating transcription of the TaSHN1 gene. Our study uncovers for the first time the regulatory role of the TaTCP15-TaSHN1-TaCYP86A2/TaCYP86A4/TaECR circuit in wheat cutin and wax biosynthesis.
Cutin and wax are major lipophilic components of the cuticle, which contributes to plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Genetic manipulation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes, as well as their regulator genes like TaTCP15 and TaSHN1, by CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas9 (CRISPR-associated nuclease 9), or targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) might provide a new avenue for improving wheat resistance against environmental stresses. In addition, the regulation of cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis is complicated, often organ-dependent, and influenced by environmental conditions. Therefore, exploring the regulatory effect of the TaTCP15-TaSHN1-TaCYP86A2/TaCYP86A4/TaECR circuit on cuticle biosynthesis in other tissues, like leaf sheaths, stems, or spikelets, as well as their response to developmental and environmental cues, could provide novel insights into the plant cuticle biosynthetic mechanisms in future research.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we revealed that the wheat class I TCP transcription factor TaTCP15 directly activates transcription of TaSHN1, a transcriptional activator gene of wheat cutin and wax biosynthesis. We found that wheat transcription factor TaSHN1 targets TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and wax biosynthesis gene TaECR and recruits the mediator subunit TaCDK8 to activate these genes’ transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the expression of TaSHN1, TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes, as well as cutin and wax accumulation, was attenuated by silencing of the TaTCP15 gene. Collectively, these findings suggest that wheat class I TCP transcription factor TaTCP15 positively regulates cutin and cuticular wax biosynthesis, probably by directly targeting the TaSHN1 gene and upregulating TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR expression. This study revealed a novel regulatory mechanism underlying wheat cuticle biosynthesis and provided valuable information for developing wheat plants with improved cuticle-associated traits.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom16020192/s1: Supplementary Figure S1. Transactivation activity analysis of TaTCP15 in wheat protoplast cells. Supplementary Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

L.F., X.W., H.L., J.L., P.Z. and C.C. planned and designed this research; L.F., X.W., H.L., J.L. and P.Z. performed the experiments; L.F., X.W., H.L., J.L. and C.C. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, with contributions from P.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2022MC008 and ZR2017BC109), the Qingdao Science and Technology Bureau Fund (17-1-1-50-jch), and the Qingdao University Fund (DC1900005385).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.; Chang, C. Evolutionary insight of plant cuticle biosynthesis in bryophytes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1943921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Berhin, A.; de Bellis, D.; Franke, R.B.; Buono, R.A.; Nowack, M.K.; Nawrath, C. The root cap cuticle: A cell wall structure for seedling establishment and lateral root formation. Cell 2019, 176, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Domínguez, E.; Heredia-Guerrero, J.A.; Heredia, A. The plant cuticle: Old challenges, new perspectives. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5251–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewandowska, M.; Keyl, A.; Feussner, I. Wax biosynthesis in response to danger: Its regulation upon abiotic and biotic stress. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Chang, C. Toward a smart skin: Harnessing cuticle biosynthesis for crop adaptation to drought, salinity, temperature, and ultraviolet stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 961829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fernández, V.; Guzmán-Delgado, P.; Graça, J.; Santos, S.; Gil, L. Cuticle structure in relation to chemical composition: Re-assessing the prevailing model. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ingram, G.; Nawrath, C. The roles of the cuticle in plant development: Organ adhesions and beyond. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5307–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yeats, T.H.; Rose, J.K. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, S.B.; Suh, M.C. Advances in the understanding of cuticular waxes in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop species. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S.B.; Suh, M.C. Regulatory mechanisms underlying cuticular wax biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 2799–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samuels, L.; Kunst, L.; Jetter, R. Sealing plant surfaces: Cuticular wax formation by epidermal cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 683–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonaventure, B.; Salas, J.J.; Pollard, M.R.; Ohlrogge, J.B. Disruption of the FATB gene in Arabidopsis demonstrates an essential role of saturated fatty acids in plant growth. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1020–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schnurr, J.; Shockey, J.; Browse, J. The acyl-CoA synthetase encoded by LACS2 is essential for normal cuticle development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lü, S.; Song, T.; Kosma, D.K.; Parsons, E.P.; Rowland, O.; Jenks, M.A. Arabidopsis CER8 encodes LONG-CHAIN ACYL-COA SYNTHETASE 1 (LACS1) that has overlapping functions with LACS2 in plant wax and cutin synthesis. Plant J. 2009, 59, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weng, H.; Molina, I.; Shockey, J.; Browse, J. Organ fusion and defective cuticle function in a lacs1 lacs2 double mutant of Arabidopsis. Planta 2010, 231, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kurdyukov, S.; Faust, A.; Trenkamp, S.; Bär, S.; Franke, R.; Efremova, N.; Tietjen, K.; Schreiber, L.; Saedler, H.; Yephremov, A. Genetic and biochemical evidence for involvement of HOTHEAD in the biosynthesis of long-chain alpha-,omega-dicarboxylic fatty acids and formation of extracellular matrix. Planta 2006, 224, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sauveplane, V.; Kandel, S.; Kastner, P.E.; Ehlting, J.; Compagnon, V.; Werck-Reichhart, D.; Pinot, F. Arabidopsis thaliana CYP77A4 is the first cytochrome P450 able to catalyze the epoxidation of free fatty acids in plants. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 719–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yang, W.; Simpson, J.P.; Li-Beisson, Y.; Beisson, F.; Pollard, M.; Ohlrogge, J.B. A land-plant-specific glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase family in Arabidopsis: Substrate specificity, sn-2 preference, and evolution. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 638–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xiao, F.; Goodwin, S.M.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, Z.; Baker, D.; Tang, X.; Jenks, M.A.; Zhou, J.M. Arabidopsis CYP86A2 represses Pseudomonas syringae type III genes and is required for cuticle development. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 2903–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Millar, A.A.; Clemens, S.; Zachgo, S.; Giblin, E.M.; Taylor, D.C.; Kunst, L. CUT1, an Arabidopsis gene required for cuticular wax biosynthesis and pollen fertility, encodes a very-long-chain fatty acid condensing enzyme. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Todd, J.; Post-Beittenmiller, D.; Jaworski, J.G. KCS1 encodes a fatty acid elongase 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase affecting wax biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1999, 17, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fiebig, A.; Mayfield, J.A.; Miley, N.L.; Chau, S.; Fischer, R.L.; Preuss, D. Alterations in CER6, a gene identical to CUT1, differentially affect long-chain lipid content on the surface of pollen and stems. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2001–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hooker, T.S.; Millar, A.A.; Kunst, L. Significance of the expression of the CER6 condensing enzyme for cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1568–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, H.; Rowland, O.; Kunst, L. Disruptions of the Arabidopsis Enoyl-CoA reductase gene reveal an essential role for very-long-chain fatty acid synthesis in cell expansion during plant morphogenesis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1467–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bach, L.; Michaelson, L.V.; Haslam, R.; Bellec, Y.; Gissot, L.; Marion, J.; Da Costa, M.; Boutin, J.P.; Miquel, M.; Tellier, F.; et al. The very-long-chain hydroxy fatty acyl-CoA dehydratase PASTICCINO2 is essential and limiting for plant development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 14727–14731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beaudoin, F.; Wu, X.; Li, F.; Haslam, R.P.; Markham, J.E.; Zheng, H.; Napier, J.A.; Kunst, L. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis beta-ketoacyl-coenzyme A reductase candidates of the fatty acid elongase. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1174–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, S.B.; Jung, S.J.; Go, Y.S.; Kim, H.U.; Kim, J.K.; Cho, H.J.; Park, O.K.; Suh, M.C. Two Arabidopsis 3-ketoacyl CoA synthase genes, KCS20 and KCS2/DAISY, are functionally redundant in cuticular wax and root suberin biosynthesis, but differentially controlled by osmotic stress. Plant J. 2009, 60, 462–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, J.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, S.B.; Go, Y.S.; Kim, H.J.; Cahoon, R.; Markham, J.E.; Cahoon, E.B.; Suh, M.C. Arabidopsis 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme a synthase9 is involved in the synthesis of tetracosanoic acids as precursors of cuticular waxes, suberins, sphingolipids, and phospholipids. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aarts, M.G.; Keijzer, C.J.; Stiekema, W.J.; Pereira, A. Molecular characterization of the CER1 gene of Arabidopsis involved in epicuticular wax biosynthesis and pollen fertility. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 2115–2127. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, X.; Goodwin, S.M.; Boroff, V.L.; Liu, X.; Jenks, M.A. Cloning and characterization of the WAX2 gene of Arabidopsis involved in cuticle membrane and wax production. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1170–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rowland, O.; Lee, R.; Franke, R.; Schreiber, L.; Kunst, L. The CER3 wax biosynthetic gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is allelic to WAX2/YRE/FLP1. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3538–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rowland, O.; Zheng, H.; Hepworth, S.R.; Lam, P.; Jetter, R.; Kunst, L. CER4 encodes an alcohol-forming fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductase involved in cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greer, S.; Wen, M.; Bird, D.; Wu, X.; Samuels, L.; Kunst, L.; Jetter, R. The cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP96A15 is the midchain alkane hydroxylase responsible for formation of secondary alcohols and ketones in stem cuticular wax of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 653–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bourdenx, B.; Bernard, A.; Domergue, F.; Pascal, S.; Léger, A.; Roby, D.; Pervent, M.; Vile, D.; Haslam, R.P.; Napier, J.A.; et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ECERIFERUM1 promotes wax very-long-chain alkane biosynthesis and influences plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bernard, A.; Domergue, F.; Pascal, S.; Jetter, R.; Renne, C.; Faure, J.D.; Haslam, R.P.; Napier, J.A.; Lessire, R.; Joubès, J. Reconstitution of plant alkane biosynthesis in yeast demonstrates that Arabidopsis ECERIFERUM1 and ECERIFERUM3 are core components of a very-long-chain alkane synthesis complex. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3106–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pascal, S.; Bernard, A.; Deslous, P.; Gronnier, J.; Fournier-Goss, A.; Domergue, F.; Rowland, O.; Joubès, J. Arabidopsis CER1-LIKE1 functions in a cuticular very-long-chain alkane-forming complex. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, X.; Zhao, H.; Kosma, D.K.; Tomasi, P.; Dyer, J.M.; Li, R.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Parsons, E.P.; Jenks, M.A.; et al. The acyl desaturase CER17 is involved in producing wax unsaturated primary alcohols and cutin monomers. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1109–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bird, D.; Beisson, F.; Brigham, A.; Shin, J.; Greer, S.; Jetter, R.; Kunst, L.; Wu, X.; Yephremov, A.; Samuels, L. Characterization of Arabidopsis ABCG11/WBC11, an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter that is required for cuticular lipid secretion. Plant J. 2007, 52, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bessire, M.; Borel, S.; Fabre, G.; Carraça, L.; Efremova, N.; Yephremov, A.; Cao, Y.; Jetter, R.; Jacquat, A.C.; Métraux, J.P.; et al. A member of the PLEIOTROPIC DRUG RESISTANCE family of ATP binding cassette transporters is required for the formation of a functional cuticle in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1958–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, H.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, H.J.; Min, M.K.; Hwang, I.; Suh, M.C. Characterization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein 2 (LTPG2) and overlapping function between LTPG/LTPG1 and LTPG2 in cuticular wax export or accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1391–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Panikashvili, D.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S.; Mandel, T.; Yifhar, T.; Franke, R.B.; Höfer, R.; Schreiber, L.; Chory, J.; Aharoni, A. The Arabidopsis DESPERADO/AtWBC11 transporter is required for cutin and wax secretion. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1345–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Panikashvili, D.; Shi, J.X.; Schreiber, L.; Aharoni, A. The Arabidopsis ABCG13 transporter is required for flower cuticle secretion and patterning of the petal epidermis. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McFarlane, H.E.; Shin, J.J.; Bird, D.A.; Samuels, A.L. Arabidopsis ABCG transporters, which are required for export of diverse cuticular lipids, dimerize in different combinations. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3066–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McFarlane, H.E.; Watanabe, Y.; Yang, W.; Huang, Y.; Ohlrogge, J.; Samuels, A.L. Golgi- and trans-Golgi network-mediated vesicle trafficking is required for wax secretion from epidermal cells. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1250–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pighin, J.A.; Zheng, H.; Balakshin, L.J.; Goodman, I.P.; Western, T.L.; Jetter, R.; Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Plant cuticular lipid export requires an ABC transporter. Science 2004, 306, 702–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Buda, G.J.; Barnes, W.J.; Fich, E.A.; Park, S.; Yeats, T.H.; Zhao, L.; Domozych, D.S.; Rose, J.K. An ATP binding cassette transporter is required for cuticular wax deposition and desiccation tolerance in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4000–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Samain, E.; van Tuinen, D.; Jeandet, P.; Aussenac, T.; Selim, S. Biological control of Septoria leaf blotch and growth promotion in wheat by Paenibacillus sp. Strain B2 and Curtobacterium plantarum Strain EDS. Biol. Control 2017, 114, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, L.; Chang, C. Suppression of wheat TaCDK8/TaWIN1 interaction negatively affects germination of Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici by interfering with very-long-chain aldehyde biosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 96, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhi, P.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Ge, P.; Chang, C. Wheat topoisomerase VI positively regulates the biosynthesis of cuticular wax and cutin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 25560–25573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhi, P.; Liu, X.; Ge, P.; Zhang, W.; Chen, W.; Chang, C. The SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex functions in concert with RNA processing machinery to regulate wheat wax biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2025, 198, kiaf153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yuan, C.; Li, C.; Yan, L.; Jackson, A.O.; Liu, Z.; Han, C.; Yu, J.; Li, D. A high throughput barley stripe mosaic virus vector for virus induced gene silencing in monocots and dicots. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Potter, C.J.; Tasic, B.; Russler, E.V.; Liang, L.; Luo, L. The Q system: A repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell 2010, 141, 536–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hansjakob, A.; Riederer, M.; Hildebrandt, U. Wax matters: Absence of very-long-chain aldehydes from the leaf cuticular wax of the glossy11 mutant of maize compromises the prepenetration processes of Blumeria graminis. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lolle, S.J.; Berlyn, G.P.; Engstrom, E.M.; Krolikowski, K.A.; Reiter, W.D.; Pruitt, R.E. Developmental regulation of cell interactions in the Arabidopsis fiddlehead-1 mutant: A role for the epidermal cell wall and cuticle. Dev. Biol. 1997, 189, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kosma, D.K.; Bourdenx, B.; Bernard, A.; Parsons, E.P.; Lü, S.; Joubès, J.; Jenks, M.A. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1918–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Camoirano, A.; Arce, A.L.; Ariel, F.D.; Alem, A.L.; Gonzalez, D.H.; Viola, I.L. Class I TCP transcription factors regulate trichome branching and cuticle development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 5438–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Functional characterization of wheat TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes in cutin biosynthesis. (A) Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of the CYP86A2 and CYP86A4 proteins identified from Arabidopsis (At), tomato (Sl), Brassica rapa (Br), rice (Os), maize (Zm), and bread wheat (Ta). TaCYP86A2-6D (TraesCS6D02G227200) and TaCYP86A4-2D (TraesCS2D02G404600) were employed as representatives of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and indicated with red circles. (B) Domain structure of wheat TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 expression levels in wheat leaves with silenced TaCYP86A2 (BSMV-TaCYP86A2as), TaCYP86A4 (BSMV-TaCYP86A4as), or TaCYP86A2, and TaCYP86A4 (BSMV-TaCYP86A2as + BSMV-TaCYP86A4as). (D) Total cutin and cuticular wax amounts in wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. (E) Cutin monomer accumulation in wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. (F) Water loss rates and (G) chlorophyll extraction levels analyzed in wheat leaves with silenced TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. BSMV-γ (BSMV empty vector) was employed as the negative control, and data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA analysis (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Functional characterization of wheat TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 genes in cutin biosynthesis. (A) Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of the CYP86A2 and CYP86A4 proteins identified from Arabidopsis (At), tomato (Sl), Brassica rapa (Br), rice (Os), maize (Zm), and bread wheat (Ta). TaCYP86A2-6D (TraesCS6D02G227200) and TaCYP86A4-2D (TraesCS2D02G404600) were employed as representatives of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 and indicated with red circles. (B) Domain structure of wheat TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 proteins. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4 expression levels in wheat leaves with silenced TaCYP86A2 (BSMV-TaCYP86A2as), TaCYP86A4 (BSMV-TaCYP86A4as), or TaCYP86A2, and TaCYP86A4 (BSMV-TaCYP86A2as + BSMV-TaCYP86A4as). (D) Total cutin and cuticular wax amounts in wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. (E) Cutin monomer accumulation in wheat leaves with silenced genes TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. (F) Water loss rates and (G) chlorophyll extraction levels analyzed in wheat leaves with silenced TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, or TaCYP86A2 and TaCYP86A4. BSMV-γ (BSMV empty vector) was employed as the negative control, and data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA analysis (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 enrichment at promoter regions of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR. (A) Schematic diagram of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoter structures. GCC box cis-elements are shown as black boxes. Promoter regions subjected to ChIP-qPCR analysis are labeled with numbers. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis of TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 occupancy at TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promotes. For (B), data were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Analysis of TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 enrichment at promoter regions of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR. (A) Schematic diagram of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoter structures. GCC box cis-elements are shown as black boxes. Promoter regions subjected to ChIP-qPCR analysis are labeled with numbers. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis of TaSHN1 and TaCDK8 occupancy at TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promotes. For (B), data were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of transcriptional activation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters by TaSHN1. (A) Schematic diagram of the reporter constructs containing wild-type (pro) or mutated (mpro) promoter fragments of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes. (B) Transactivation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes by TaSHN1 in wheat protoplasts. Data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Analysis of transcriptional activation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters by TaSHN1. (A) Schematic diagram of the reporter constructs containing wild-type (pro) or mutated (mpro) promoter fragments of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes. (B) Transactivation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR genes by TaSHN1 in wheat protoplasts. Data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of transcriptional activation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters by the TaCDK8-TaSHN1 module. (A) Effect of TaCDK8 on the TaSHN1-mediated transactivation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters in wheat protoplasts. A schematic diagram of the reporter constructs is shown in Figure 3A. Nuclear run-on (B) and RT-qPCR (C) analysis of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR transcription in the wheat leaves with silenced genes TaSHN1 and TaCDK8. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control. For (AC), data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Analysis of transcriptional activation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters by the TaCDK8-TaSHN1 module. (A) Effect of TaCDK8 on the TaSHN1-mediated transactivation of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR promoters in wheat protoplasts. A schematic diagram of the reporter constructs is shown in Figure 3A. Nuclear run-on (B) and RT-qPCR (C) analysis of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR transcription in the wheat leaves with silenced genes TaSHN1 and TaCDK8. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control. For (AC), data were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g004
Figure 5. Transcriptional regulation of TaSHN1 genes by transcription factor TaTCP15. (A) Schematic diagram of TaSHN1 promoter structures. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis of TaTCP15 occupancy at TaSHN1 promoters. A fragment of the intergenic region was employed as the negative control. (C) Transactivation of the TaSHN1 gene by TaTCP15 in wheat protoplast cells transfected with the indicated pairs of effectors and LUC reporter. Nuclear run-on (D) and RT-qPCR (E) analysis of TaSHN1 transcription in the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control. For (B,D,E), three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01). For (C), three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA analysis (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Transcriptional regulation of TaSHN1 genes by transcription factor TaTCP15. (A) Schematic diagram of TaSHN1 promoter structures. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis of TaTCP15 occupancy at TaSHN1 promoters. A fragment of the intergenic region was employed as the negative control. (C) Transactivation of the TaSHN1 gene by TaTCP15 in wheat protoplast cells transfected with the indicated pairs of effectors and LUC reporter. Nuclear run-on (D) and RT-qPCR (E) analysis of TaSHN1 transcription in the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control. For (B,D,E), three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01). For (C), three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA analysis (different letters represent p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g005
Figure 6. Functional analyses of wheat TaTCP15 genes in cuticular wax and cutin accumulation. Transcription rates (A) and expression levels (B) of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR in the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15 were measured by nuclear run-on and qRT-PCR assays, respectively. (C) Total cutin and cuticular wax amounts in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (D) Amounts of major cutin monomers in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (E) Amounts of major wax components in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (F) Water loss rates and (G) chlorophyll extraction levels analyzed in TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control, and three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01).
Figure 6. Functional analyses of wheat TaTCP15 genes in cuticular wax and cutin accumulation. Transcription rates (A) and expression levels (B) of TaCYP86A2, TaCYP86A4, and TaECR in the wheat leaves with silenced gene TaTCP15 were measured by nuclear run-on and qRT-PCR assays, respectively. (C) Total cutin and cuticular wax amounts in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (D) Amounts of major cutin monomers in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (E) Amounts of major wax components in the TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. (F) Water loss rates and (G) chlorophyll extraction levels analyzed in TaTCP15-silenced wheat leaves. BSMV-γ was employed as the negative control, and three technical replicates per treatment were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test (** represents p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 16 00192 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, L.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Zhi, P.; Chang, C. Wheat Class I TCP Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Positively Regulates Cutin and Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis. Biomolecules 2026, 16, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16020192

AMA Style

Fang L, Wang X, Li H, Liu J, Zhi P, Chang C. Wheat Class I TCP Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Positively Regulates Cutin and Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis. Biomolecules. 2026; 16(2):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16020192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Linzhu, Xiaoyu Wang, Haoyu Li, Jiao Liu, Pengfei Zhi, and Cheng Chang. 2026. "Wheat Class I TCP Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Positively Regulates Cutin and Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis" Biomolecules 16, no. 2: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16020192

APA Style

Fang, L., Wang, X., Li, H., Liu, J., Zhi, P., & Chang, C. (2026). Wheat Class I TCP Transcription Factor TaTCP15 Positively Regulates Cutin and Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis. Biomolecules, 16(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16020192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop