Next Article in Journal
Human Mutant Dynactin Subunit 1 Causes Profound Motor Neuron Disease Consistent with Possible Mechanisms Involving Axonopathy, Mitochondriopathy, Protein Nitration, and T-Cell-Mediated Cytolysis
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Apoptosis-Resistant Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells During a Sterile Inflammatory Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Embracing the Multifaceted Roles of Biomolecules in Biology and Medicine

Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Thrombosis Research, Lillehei Heart Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Biomolecules 2025, 15(12), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121636
Submission received: 5 August 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 17 November 2025 / Published: 21 November 2025
In recent peer-review discussions, a recurring critique has emerged: certain manuscripts, though scientifically rigorous, may fall outside the perceived thematic boundaries of the Biomolecules. As senior editor and a member of the advisory board, I see this as an opportune moment to reframe and reaffirm our editorial vision. Biomolecules, by their very nature, do not operate in silos [1]; rather, their identities and functions span a continuum of biological organization—from atoms to organisms, from biochemical reactions to systems-level physiology and pathology [2,3]. This continuum unfolds across multiple layers: The molecular level involves structure–function relationships, binding affinities, catalytic properties; the cellular level involves signaling pathways, regulatory loops, metabolic fluxes; the tissue and organ levels involve organ-specific functions, interactions, pathophysiological states; and the systemic and integrative levels involve whole-body responses, aging, disease progression, therapeutic outcomes.
Traditionally, the term “biomolecule” evokes DNA, RNA, proteins, lipids, and metabolites. Yet their significance extends beyond their chemical identities. They are the language of life—encoding, transmitting, and executing biological information [4]. They act as orchestrators of cellular dialogue, catalysts of adaptation, and sentinels of health and disease [5,6]. Their roles are dynamic and context-dependent: at times narrowly specialized, such as cleaving a substrate, and at other times serving as global regulators of development, immunity, metabolism, or cognition. Biomolecules operate within intricate networks—signal transduction, gene regulation, metabolic pathways—where interactions generate emergent behaviors. Systems biology integrates multi-omics datasets—genomics, proteomics, metabolomics—into computational models that reveal how complex cellular properties arise from molecular interactions. For example, biomolecular condensates, membrane-less assemblies that organize signaling and gene expression, have emerged as central regulatory hubs whose dysfunction is linked to disease [7].
At the molecular level, covalent and non-covalent interactions shape the three-dimensional architecture of proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates [8]. Enzymes recognize substrates with exquisite specificity, reducing activation energy and accelerating biochemical reactions [9]. Molecular recognition—such as ligand binding to proteins or nucleic acids—is finely tuned and essential for biological function [10]. These molecular processes naturally scale to the cellular level, where ligand–receptor interactions initiate cascades that convert external signals into functional responses [11]. Platelet activation provides a vivid example: agonists such as thromboxane, ADP, collagen, thrombin, and epinephrine bind their receptors, triggering GTP-binding proteins, phospholipase C activation, and generation of second messengers (IP3 and DAG). IP3 mobilizes calcium from intracellular stores, while DAG activates protein kinase C—together driving platelet activation (Figure 1A,B). Antagonists such as adenosine, prostaglandin E1, prostacyclin (PGI2), and nitric oxide counteract this by lowering cytosolic calcium via adenylyl and guanylyl cyclases [12,13,14]. This illustrates a broader principle: biomolecules rarely act alone, and are instead elements of finely tuned regulatory networks.
Biomolecules also underpin metabolic regulation. They serve as building blocks, energy sources, and signaling mediators to maintain homeostasis [15]. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), for instance, is central to metabolic balance and the basis for advanced diabetes and obesity treatments. More broadly, tools such as flux-balance analysis and kinetic modeling reveal how reaction rates adapt to environmental changes [16]. At the tissue and organ levels, protein folding ensures function, while misfolding contributes to pathology [17]. Aging, with its hallmarks of genomic instability, telomere shortening, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chronic inflammation, highlights the systemic consequences of biomolecular dysfunction [18,19,20]. For example, liver cell senescence accelerates whole-body aging [19], while chronic inflammation contributes to diabetes, metabolic disorders, and neurodegeneration [20]. Classic case studies underscore these principles: hemoglobin’s oxygen binding demonstrates how subtle conformational shifts alter affinity, enabling efficient oxygen transport [21]. Kinases such as PI3K and MAPK regulate downstream pathways through precise catalytic mechanisms [22]. CRISPR-Cas9, an RNA-guided nuclease, exemplifies biomolecules as precision molecular tools now central to gene editing [23].
At the cellular scale, insulin binding initiates a cascade involving IRS-1, Akt, and GLUT4, regulating glucose uptake in adipocytes and muscle cells [24]. The tumor suppressor p53 senses DNA damage and determines whether to initiate repair, cell-cycle arrest, or apoptosis, depending on context [25]. Cytokines like IL-6 exemplify how biomolecules mediate immune communication, with effects determined by receptor distribution and co-signals [26]. At the organ level, cardiac troponins regulate heart muscle contraction and serve as biomarkers for myocardial infarction [27]. Apolipoprotein E isoforms influence lipid metabolism in the liver and brain, linking cardiovascular health to neurodegeneration [28]. In the kidney, renin and angiotensinogen collaborate within the RAAS to regulate blood pressure. At the systemic level, biomolecules orchestrate whole-body physiology and therapeutic outcomes. Leptin communicates adipose status to the hypothalamus, integrating metabolism across tissues. Cortisol coordinates systemic stress responses, influencing immunity, metabolism, and mood [29]. Therapeutically, monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab target specific biomolecules, altering cancer progression and survival [30]. Importantly, biomolecules are not static. Their roles shift with context: pro-inflammatory in one tissue, anti-inflammatory in another; beneficial during development, yet potentially oncogenic later in life. This adaptability reflects both their power and their complexity.
With this perspective, the Biomolecules seeks to be inclusive—not limited to classical biochemistry but welcoming interdisciplinary studies in systems biology, synthetic biology, clinical research, pharmacology, and translational science. Manuscripts that traverse traditional boundaries—linking structure to function, molecule to phenotype, or discovery to application—are not only welcomed but essential to advancing the field.
In an era when biology and medicine increasingly operate with molecular precision, let us foster a platform that reflects the true versatility and impact of biomolecules.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. So long to the silos. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 357. [CrossRef]
  2. Shah, D. Biomolecules: The Elements That Make Up Life. Int. J. Basic Clin. Stud. 2023, 8, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barr, A.J. The biochemical basis of disease. Essays Biochem. 2018, 62, 619–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, V. The potential role of biomolecules in cellular function. Global J. Life Sci. Res. 2023, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wygrecka, M.; Kosanovic, D.; Kwapiszewska, G.; Preissner, K.T. Multitasking biomolecules in human pathologies: Known players on their unexpected journeys. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stranger, B.E.; Dermitzakis, E.T. From DNA to RNA and back: The ‘central dogma’ of regulatory disease variation. Hum. Genom. 2006, 2, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jeon, S.; Jeon, Y.; Lim, J.Y.; Kim, Y.; Cha, B.; Kim, W. Emerging regulatory mechanisms and functions of biomolecular condensates: Implications for therapeutic targets. Nat. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kortagere, S.; Krasowski, M.D.; Ekins, S. The importance of discerning shape in molecularpharmacology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Robinson, P.K. Enzymes: Principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biochem. 2015, 59, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McBride, J.M.; Eckmann, J.; Tlusty, T. General theory of specific binding: Insights from a genetic-mechano-chemical protein model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2022, 39, msac217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bich, L.; Mossio, M.; Soto, A.M. Glycemia regulation: From feedback loops to organizational closure. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rao, G.H.R. Role of Biomolecules, Biologics in Precision Medicine. Personalized Medicine and Emerging Therapies. Int. J. Biomed. 2022, 12, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, G.H.R. Editorial: Insights in diabetes: Molecular mechanisms 2022. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1242759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tate, A.R.; Rao, G.H.R. Inflammation: Is it a healer, Confounder, or a Promoter of Cardiometabolic Risks? Biomolecules 2024, 14, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tate, A.C.; Rao, G.H.R. Cardiometabolic Diseases: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Cardiol Cardiovasc. Res. 2025, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Conley, J.M.; Jochim, A.; Evans-Molina, C.; Watts, V.J.; Ren, H. G Protein-Coupled Receptor 17 inhibits Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Secretion via Gi/o-dependent mechanisms in enteroendocrine cells. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Antoniewicz, M.R. A guide to metabolic flux analysis in metabolic engineering: Methods, tools and applications. Metab. Eng. 2021, 63, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Diaz-Villanueva, J.; Diaz-Molina, R.; Gardia-Gonzalez, V. Protein folding and mechanisms of proteostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 17193–17230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guo, J.; Huang, X.; Dou, L.; Yan, M.; Shen, T.; Tang, W.; Li, J. Aging and aging-related diseases: From molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.; Xiao, N.; Zhang, H.; Liang, G.; Lin, Y.; Qian, Z.; Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Systemic ageing and ageing-related diseases. FASEB J. 2025, 39, e70430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yin, Z.; Li, D.; Guo, Q.; Wang, R.; Li, W. Effect of HB conformational changes on oxygen transport physiology. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2024, 49, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Babu, C.S.; Babar, S.M.; Song, E.J.; Oh, E.; Yoo, Y.S. Kinetic analysis of the MAPK and P13K/Akt signalling pathways. Mol. Cells 2008, 25, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Asmamaw, M.; Zawdie, B. Mechanisms and applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-mediated Genome Editing. Biologics 2021, 15, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Meyts, P.D. The Insulin Receptor and Its Signal Transduction Network; Feingold, K.R., Ahmed, S.F., Anawalt, B., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK378978/ (accessed on 15 November 2025).
  25. Abuetabh, Y.; Wu, H.H.; Chai, C.; Al Yousef, H.; Persad, S.; Sergi, C.M.; Leng, R. DNA damage response revisited: The p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022, 54, 1658–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Altna-Bonnet, G.; Mukherjee, R. Cytokine-mediated communication: A quantitative appraisal of immune complexity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Solaro, R.J.; Rosevear, P.; Kobayashi, T. The unique functions of cardiac troponin 1 in the control of cardiac muscle contraction and relaxation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2007, 369, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, Y.; Mahley, R.W. Apolipoprotein E: Structure and function in lipid metabolism, neurobiology, and Alzhemiers’s diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 72, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Orihashi, R.; Imamura, Y.; Yamada, S.; Monji, A.; Mizoguchi, Y. Association between cortisol and aging-related hippocampus volume changes in community-dwelling older adults: A 7-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatr. 2022, 22, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fiszman, G.L.; Jasnis, M.A. Molecular mechanisms of Trastuzumab resistance in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2011, 2011, 352182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Signal transduction mechanisms involved in blood platelet activation. (Designed by the author and developed by artists at the University of Minnesota).
Figure 1. Signal transduction mechanisms involved in blood platelet activation. (Designed by the author and developed by artists at the University of Minnesota).
Biomolecules 15 01636 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rao, G.H.R. Embracing the Multifaceted Roles of Biomolecules in Biology and Medicine. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121636

AMA Style

Rao GHR. Embracing the Multifaceted Roles of Biomolecules in Biology and Medicine. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(12):1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rao, Gundu H. R. 2025. "Embracing the Multifaceted Roles of Biomolecules in Biology and Medicine" Biomolecules 15, no. 12: 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121636

APA Style

Rao, G. H. R. (2025). Embracing the Multifaceted Roles of Biomolecules in Biology and Medicine. Biomolecules, 15(12), 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15121636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop