Next Article in Journal
Amino Acid Signaling for TOR in Eukaryotes: Sensors, Transducers, and a Sustainable Agricultural fuTORe
Next Article in Special Issue
Continuous Low-Intensity Ultrasound Preserves Chondrogenesis of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in the Presence of Cytokines by Inhibiting NFκB Activation
Previous Article in Journal
TLR4 Expression in Ex-Lichenoid Lesions—Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Its Surrounding Epithelium: The Role of Tumor Inflammatory Microenvironment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Cell Stemness and the Complexity of the Adipose Tissue Niche
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/biom12030386
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Potential of Using Infrapatellar–Fat–Pad–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapy in Degenerative Arthritis: Chondrogenesis, Exosomes, and Transcription Regulation

by
Hsiu-Jung Liao
1,
Chih-Hung Chang
1,2,*,
Chi-Ying F. Huang
3,4 and
Hui-Ting Chen
5,6,7,*
1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220216, Taiwan
2
Graduate School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City 320315, Taiwan
3
Department of Biotechnology and Laboratory Science in Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
4
Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
5
Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
6
Department of Fragrance and Cosmetic Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
7
School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(3), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030386
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 23 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 February 2022 / Published: 1 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate and Potential Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Infrapatellar fat pad–derived mesenchymal stem cells (IPFP-MSCs) are a type of adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC). They potentially contribute to cartilage regeneration and modulation of the immune microenvironment in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The ability of IPFP-MSCs to increase chondrogenic capacity has been reported to be greater, less age dependent, and less affected by inflammatory changes than that of other MSCs. Transcription-regulatory factors strictly regulate the cartilage differentiation of MSCs. However, few studies have explored the effect of transcriptional factors on IPFP-MSC-based neocartilage formation, cartilage engineering, and tissue functionality during and after chondrogenesis. Instead of intact MSCs, MSC-derived extracellular vesicles could be used for the treatment of OA. Furthermore, exosomes are increasingly being considered the principal therapeutic agent in MSC secretions that is responsible for the regenerative and immunomodulatory functions of MSCs in cartilage repair. The present study provides an overview of advancements in enhancement strategies for IPFP-MSC chondrogenic differentiation, including the effects of transcriptional factors, the modulation of released exosomes, delivery mechanisms for MSCs, and ethical and regulatory points concerning the development of MSC products. This review will contribute to the understanding of the IPFP-MSC chondrogenic differentiation process and enable the improvement of IPFP-MSC-based cartilage tissue engineering.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease and is characterized by progressive articular-cartilage loss. Several strategies for identifying an abundant and suitable cell population for replenishing injured hyaline cartilage through stem-cell-based cartilage-repair therapies have been explored [1,2]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert chondroprotective effects and differentiate into cartilage cells, and they have become an attractive cell source for cell therapy for cartilage repair. They are capable of chondrogenic induction, differentiating into chondrocytes and forming hyaline-like cartilage. They contribute to histopathological improvement by promoting cartilage regeneration [3]. Some transcription factors play an essential role in regulating the expression of gene markers of chondrocytes, including collagen types II, IX, X, and XI; aggrecan; and cartilage link proteins [4,5]. During OA progression, changes in chondrocyte function and phenotype occur due to the intracellular and extracellular signals that each chondrocyte receives and integrates into gene expression over time.
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are used to treat articular-cartilage injury because they are easy to harvest and exhibit high cartilaginous production capacity. ADSC sources, namely the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) and subcutaneous fat (SC), serve as reservoirs of MSCs. The IPFP is located in the extrasynovial area of the anterior compartment of the knee joint and is a rich source of MSCs. A large amount of adipose tissue can also be obtained from subcutaneous fat removed through liposuction (Figure 1).
Patient age is a crucial parameter that sometimes limits the success of cell therapy. Unlike those of BMSCs, the proliferation and differentiation capacities of infrapatellar fat pad–derived MSCs (IPFP-MSCs) do not differ significantly among patient age groups. This makes them promising for use in stem-cell-based regenerative therapy [6]. However, few studies have investigated transcription-factor regulation and microRNAs (miRNAs) involved in cartilage regeneration and identified the critical regulatory networks for IPFP-MSCs. In this paper, we review transcriptional factors and exosomal miRNAs from ADSCs from different sources, which may have major implications for the therapeutic potential of IPFP-MSCs and facilitate or inspire future IPFP-MSC studies.
Advanced age may inhibit the repair capacity of MSCs and may be a risk factor for OA. MSCs at late passages exhibit senescent phenotypes with reduced proliferative capacity and suboptimal multidifferentiation potential [7]. ADSC-derived exosomes possess chondroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties [8,9]. Exosomes encapsulate various molecular constituents that mediate communication among different cells and modulate multiple biological processes, including immune responses and cell differentiation [10,11]. Thus, an extracellular vesicle (EV)–mediated delivery system could be effective and efficient for the treatment of OA because it can rejuvenate senescent MSCs and can be realized using EVs from super donors. Therefore, exosomes might enable cell-free therapy, providing the same clinical benefits without the potential risks associated with infusions of living cells, such as immune rejection or tumor formation [12]. In addition, the small size and low complexity of exosomes make their production and storage easier than those for cellular methods [13].
In this paper, we first summarize the transcription factors that regulate the chondrogenesis of MSCs and exosome modulation in immune responses and evaluate the potential of using MSCs for cartilage regeneration in patients with OA. Moreover, the potential of MSC-derived-exosome cell-free therapy for OA treatment is discussed.

2. Positive Transcriptional Control of Chondrogenesis

Chondrogenesis is a strictly regulated multistep process mediated by chondrogenic genes and transcription factors. In this section, the essential transcription factors and related chondrogenic target genes during chondrocyte differentiation are introduced, and their roles in chondrogenesis are described. During chondrogenesis, mesenchymal cells condense and differentiate into early stage chondrocytes. Proliferating chondrocytes can produce sufficient chondrocyte-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, such as type II collagen (encoded by Col2a1) and aggrecan (encoded by Acan) [14]. Proliferating chondrocytes grow and differentiate into prehypertrophic and hypertrophic chondrocytes [15], which are characterized by the expression of Indian hedgehog (Ihh) and type X collagen (Col10a1), respectively [16,17]. These late-stage chondrocytes subsequently undergo terminal differentiation and produce matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13), enabling the vascular invasion of cartilage [18]. Finally, terminal chondrocytes become apoptotic and are replaced by bone [14].
In Figure 2, the stages of MSCs committed to the chondroprogenitor stage of chondrocyte differentiation are illustrated. The chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs is a tightly regulated, multistep process mediated by several transcription factors, including sex-determining region Y–related high-mobility group box (SOX) proteins, trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1), and runt-related transcription factors (RUNXs).

2.1. Sex-Determining Region Y–Related High-Mobility Group Box 9 (SOX9)

Genes of the SOX family, especially SOX9, SOX6, and SOX5, are essential for chondrogenesis [5]. SOX9 can induce the differentiation of MSCs into chondrogenic lineages. SOX5 and SOX6 are similar in structure, and their functions are redundant in chondrogenesis. However, SOX9 alone is insufficient for cartilage formation; SOX5 or SOX6 is required for SOX9 to drive chondrogenesis. The combination of SOX5, SOX6, and SOX9, often referred to as the SOX trio, provides sufficient signals for the formation of permanent cartilage.
SOX9 is primarily expressed in chondrogenic mesenchymal cells, prechondrocytes, and chondrocytes, but it is not expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes [19]. It is required for the commitment and differentiation of pluripotent mesenchymal cells toward chondrogenic lineages [20]. SOX9 can also regulate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation by directly controlling the expression of chondrocyte-specific genes. During embryonic cartilage development, mesenchymal progenitor cells exist as aggregates and condensation-like spheroids [21]. SOX9 expression levels are elevated in condensing mesenchymal progenitors both in vitro and in vivo. The mesenchymal cells of SOX9-knockout mice cannot undergo condensation [22,23]. In SOX9-deficient mice, mesenchymal cells were absent from all cartilage but were present in juxtaposed mesenchyme that did not express chondrocyte markers such as c collagen and aggrecan [24]. Moreover, the conditional inactivation of SOX9 in limb buds before mesenchymal condensation resulted in the complete absence of chondrocytes and conditional inactivation of SOX9 after mesenchymal condensation, resulting in severe generalized chondrodysplasia [11].
SOXs are genes that encode transcription factors and regulate mRNA synthesis. SOX9 is a transcription factor that influences the transcription of SOX5 and SOX6. SOX5 and SOX6 share only 50% identity with SOX9 in the high-mobility group domain, and unlike SOX9, they do not feature a transactivation domain [25]. They not only are expressed with SOX9 in prechondrocytes but also can enhance the transcriptional activity of SOX9 [5]. Previous analyses have revealed that SOX5 and SOX6 bind to the same enhancers as SOX9, securing SOX9 binding to DNA [25]. In vitro, SOX5 and SOX6 also bind with SOX9 to chondrocyte-specific enhancers in Col2a1, Acan, and other chondrocyte genes, indicating that SOX9 is a transcriptional activator required for chondrogenesis [26]. Mice with individual SOX5−/− or SOX6−/− variants are born with mild skeletal abnormalities, and mice with both SOX5−/− and SOX6−/− variants die in utero with rudimentary and poorly developed cartilage, expressing type II collagen and aggrecan at low-to-undetectable levels [27]. The expression of SOX9 in SOX5−/−/SOX6−/− mutant mice is insufficient for the formation of cartilage primordia [20]. SOX5/6 homodimers and heterodimers can bind close to SOX9 on cartilage-specific super enhancers. The forced expression of SOX5/6 and SOX9 is sufficient for the differentiation of stem cells into chondrocytes.

2.2. Runt-Related Transcription Factors (RUNX)

Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX) proteins, namely, RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3, are a family of transcription factors expressed during chondrogenesis. RUNX1 is involved in early chondrogenic differentiation and is also expressed by chondrocyte progenitors [28,29]. RUNX2 generally modulates the progression of OA by suppressing chondrocyte hypertrophy. RUNX3 regulates target genes during chondrocyte development and accelerates chondrocyte differentiation and maturation.
In vitro, RUNX1 suppresses the hypertrophic differentiation of cultured chondrocytes. The chondrogenic compounds TD-198946 and kartogenin also facilitate chondrogenesis by inducing RUNX1 expression [30]. RUNX1 can enhance cartilage matrix production and induce chondrogenic transcription factors such as SOX genes. In addition, RUNX1 activates the COL2A1 promoter by binding to the RUNX motif of the 5′ flanking regions. In articular cartilage, RUNX1 gene expression is decreased in patients with OA [30]. Aini et al. demonstrated that the intra-articular injection of polyplex nanomicelles containing RUNX1 mRNA could suppress the development of surgically induced OA in mice [31].
Collectively, these data support the protective role of RUNX1 in articular-cartilage maintenance; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying the enhancement of cartilage matrix production and suppression of hypertrophic differentiation by RUNX1 remain poorly understood.
The role of RUNX2 in skeletal development and OA has been thoroughly studied. The RUNX2 protein is highly expressed in the prehypertrophic and hypertrophic zones of limb epiphyseal cartilage, increasing hypertrophic differentiation [32]. Kamekura et al. reported that RUNX2 contributes to the pathogenesis of OA by inducing chondrocyte hypertrophy and matrix breakdown [33]. Numerous studies have reported that RUNX2 deficiency decelerates the progression of OA by suppressing hypertrophic differentiation. In addition, RUNX2 deletion causes a lack of ossification that impairs chondrocyte maturation [34]. Specific RUNX2-deficient chondrocytes partially attenuate the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM), a surgery-induced OA-like defect in adult mice [35].
SOX9 primarily controls the regulation of RUNX2. This regulation involves CYPA, a positive regulator of RUNX2 and SOX9 expression in chondroprogenitor cells. In vitro, CypA knockdown suppresses chondrogenesis and endochondral ossification. NKX3.2 serves as another regulator of RUNX2. NKX3.2 represses RUNX2 activity through direct interaction with the RUNX2 promoter, and this repression is required for the progression of bone morphogenetic protein–induced chondrogenesis. COL10A1, a type of collagen expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes destined for endochondral ossification, is also a direct transcriptional target of RUNX2. Hinoi et al. demonstrated that RUNX2 enhances the expression of FGF18, a negative regulator of chondrocyte maturation, in the perichondrium [36]. Thus, RUNX2 is generally regarded as the dominant regulator of chondrocyte hypertrophy.
RUNX2 has another potent function in inducing osteogenesis. The regulation of osteogenesis and chondrocyte proliferation by RUNX2 is accomplished through interaction with PI3K–Akt signaling. In addition to inducing osteogenesis, RUNX2 has also been shown to increase adipogenic differentiation in vitro.
RUNX3 plays a key role in chondrocyte differentiation. The expression of RUNX3 is increased in prehypertrophic chondrocytes and maintained in hypertrophic chondrocytes. However, RUNX3 is reduced in terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes, and the RUNX3 expression pattern overlaps with that of RUNX2 [37]. At a transcriptional level, RUNX2 and myocyte enhancer factor-2C (MEF2C) have been implicated as key transcription factors regulating chondrocyte hypertrophy, as they drive the expression of terminal differentiation markers, type X collagen, MMP3, MMP13, integrin-binding sialoprotein (IBSP), Indian hedgehog (Ihh), and alkaline phosphatase [38]. In humans, MEF2C and RUNX3, but not RUNX2, are the key transcription factors driving hypertrophy and regulating the endochondral pathway in MSCs [39]. These phenomena suggest that RUNX3 is key for the formation of hypertrophy-resistant cartilage because it facilitates the optimal utilization of MSCs between the chondral and endochondral pathways.

2.3. Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Type 1 (TRPS1)

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is a chondrogenic GATA-like transcription factor that serves as a regulator of chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation. Suemoto et al. demonstrated that TRPS1 regulates chondrocyte proliferation and survival by controlling STAT3 expression. TRPS1 inhibits STAT3 expression, which controls chondrocyte proliferation and survival by regulating the expression of CYCLIN D1 and BCL2. In addition, Trps1 interacts with Ihh/Gli3 signaling and affects chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation [40]. A disrupted Trps1 gene in mice also results in chondrodysplasia due to the reduced proliferation of chondrocytes and decreased apoptosis in growth plates [41]. In Trps1-knockout mice, parathyroid-hormone-related protein is overexpressed and Ihh-mediated chondrogenesis is inhibited through an Ihh/PTHrP negative-feedback loop [42].
TRPS1 interacts with many miRNAs and other signaling pathways. TRPS1 can maintain the low level of miR-221 that allows MSCs to differentiate into the chondrocyte lineage [43]. The interaction between TRPS1 and miR-221 could be a feedback loop, and TRPS1 expression is regulated by seven RUNX2-targeting miRNAs: miR-23a, miR-30c, miR-34c, miR-133a, miR-135a, miR-205, and miR-217 [44]. The essential transcription factors that regulate the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs and the factors’ respective miRNAs are listed in Table 1.

3. Negative Regulators of Chondrogenesis

Chondrogenesis is not only positively regulated by SOX and other proteins but also negatively regulated by some transcription factors, which inhibit the expression of ECM proteins in chondrogenic cells. The negative regulators Slug and C/EBPβ are expressed by hypertrophic chondrocytes, which indicates that they control terminal chondrocyte differentiation and promote endochondral ossification [58] (Figure 2). δEF1, AP-2α, and Twist1 are expressed by chondrocyte progenitors and prevent the production of cartilage-like mesenchymal tissue, indicating that they negatively regulate early phase chondrogenesis [59,60,61,62,63].

4. MSCs Derived from Synovial Tissue Have Strong Chondrogenic Potential

Because of their ease to be harvested, high proliferation rate and differentiation capacity, and strong resistance to the effects of age and passage, ADSCs, particularly those isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue (SC-ADSCs), may be effective candidates for cell-based regenerative therapies, especially for older adult patients [64]. SC-ADSCs are candidate MSCs for the treatment of OA because they promote chondrogenesis and inhibit the inflammation of cartilage.
In addition to SC-ADSCs, synovium-derived MSCs (SDMSCs), which are derived from the synovial membrane surrounding joints, exhibit stronger chondrogenic potential both in vitro and in certain in vivo states. The synovium is a postnatal reservoir of MSCs. The synovium descends from the embryonic joint interzone and maintains joint tissues in adults. Roelofs et al. discovered that human SDMSCs exhibit morphogenetic properties by patterning a joint-like organ in vivo [65]. When researchers compared synovium and cartilage with respect to the anatomical location and functional structure, SDMSCs were determined to possess a tissue-specific nature and to have a gene expression profile similar to that of chondrocytes. Therefore, SDMSCs respond most appropriately to signaling in the joint cavity, thereby, facilitating cartilage regeneration [66].
Two subsets of SDMSCs can be obtained. Fibrous SDMSCs can be harvested from the noncartilaginous area of the lateral condyle of the femur, an area that is overlaid with the lateral part of the knee joint capsule. Adipose SDMSCs are located in the IPFP behind the patellar tendon. Cells derived from fibrous and adipose synovium exhibit higher proliferative potential, colony-forming efficiency, and cartilage matrix production than do those derived from subcutaneous fat. Although both SDMSCs are superior in terms of their chondrogenic potential, the properties of fibrous SDMSCs are more favorable for cartilage formation [67]. Inflammatory activity in the synovium changes the composition and functional characteristics of SDMSCs [68]. Although adipose SDMSCs do not possess all the favorable qualities of fibrous SDMSCs, they may still be a superior choice for the treatment of OA because few inflammatory changes are associated with the IPFP [66].

5. IPFP-MSCs Are Superior to Other MSCs in OA Treatment

MSC therapies have exhibited the potential to regenerate cartilage in animal and preclinical studies [69]. The initial proposal of using MSCs for cartilage repair was based on the ability of MSCs to differentiate into chondrocytes to directly replace damaged cartilage. Because the proliferation and differentiation capacities of SC-ADSCs are minimally affected by age and multiple passages, SC-ADSCs may be effective candidates for cell-based regenerative therapies, especially for older adult patients [64]. SC-ADSCs are candidate MSCs for the treatment of OA because they promote chondrogenesis and inhibit the inflammation of cartilage.
The IPFP is located intra-articularly and extrasynovially in the knee joint. It is primarily located between the joint capsule and the synovial membrane. It relieves shock to the knee and protects the knee joint under physiological conditions or in the early stage of knee OA. Therefore, the role of the IPFP in degenerative arthritis has attracted increasing attention.
An orthopedic surgeon can easily collect IPFP tissue during high tibial osteotomy (HTO), total knee replacement (TKR), or knee arthroscopy. Additionally, the use of IPFP tissue eliminates the need to collect subcutaneous fat tissue from other sites, which can effectively reduce the number of additional surgical procedures required. Moreover, IPFP-MSCs can serve as a source for establishing an allogenic cell bank for OA therapies in the future.
The IPFP may secrete factors that protect the knee joint, such as lipid-mediated lipoxin A4. The levels of lipid-mediated lipoxin A4 in the IPFPs of patients with OA are higher than those in the IPFPs of healthy individuals, and the IPFP can prevent cartilage degradation in the knee [70,71]. The IPFP also secretes leptin, which can promote the production of articular-cartilage proteoglycan and type II collagen and stimulates the synthesis of growth factors (namely, insulin-like growth factor-1 and transforming growth factor-β), thereby, enhancing chondrocyte proliferation and protecting against the pathogenesis of knee OA [72,73]. The IPFP can also block the secretion of proinflammatory mediators in the synovia and chondrocytes of patients with OA [9].
In addition to the aforementioned advantages, the chondrogenic capacity of IPFP-MSCs is comparable to that of SDSCs, with no significant differences between the capacity between young and older adult donors. IPFP-MSCs are readily available to orthopedic surgeons and can resist inflammation and senescence, rendering them superior to SDSCs and SC-ADSCs for use in the treatment of knee OA. The chondrogenic capacity of IPFP-MSCs is greater than that of bone-marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) and subcutaneous ADSCs [74]. Chang et al. reported that patients with knee OA who received a single intra-articular injection of autologous IPFP-MSCs exhibited suppressed inflammation and alleviation of disease symptoms [75].
Manferdini et al. demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effects of downregulating the expression of inflammatory factors (such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) produced by chondrocytes or synoviocytes during coculture [9]. Koh et al. also demonstrated that the intra-articular injection of a combination of IPFP-MSCs and platelet-rich plasma effectively reduced pain and improved knee function in patients with knee OA [76]. This indicates that IPFSCs, in addition to SDSCs, may serve as a cell source for cartilage regeneration [77]. These findings also elucidate how the function of IPFP-MSC-based therapies and the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs make them ideal for treating peri-articular and intra-articular pathologies associated with OA.

6. MSC Delivery Mechanisms

MSCs can be delivered using a hydrogel carrier, by direct injection, or through magnetic fields. Injectable stem cell carriers, including hyaluronic acid (HA) and various hydrogel systems [78], are used in translational and clinical applications. HA is commonly used to deliver MSCs to treat cartilage lesions and joint degeneration. HA exhibits excellent biocompatibility with MSC cells. Desando et al. reported that the combination of MSCs and HA regulated cell homing while promoting attachment and integration within the damaged articular cartilage [79]. Huang et al. determined that IPFP-MSCs combined with chitosan/hyaluronic-acid nanoparticles promoted chondrogenic differentiation [80]. Moreover, agarose hydrogels combined with porcine IPFP-MSCs increased chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and mechanical functionality [81]. Fibrin hydrogels incorporated with TGF-β1-loaded gelatin microspheres in porcine IPFP-MSCs also enhanced in vitro chondrogenesis by enhancing glycosaminoglycan production [82]. Sekiya et al. reported that eight patients with OA who received synovial MSC injections without carriers exhibited significant inhibition of alterations in the projected cartilage area ratio in the femoral posteromedial region and improvement of clinical scores at 30 weeks after injection. In addition, Ochi et al. reported that delivering magnetically labeled MSCs (m-MSCs) by using magnetic fields was a potential approach to repairing cartilage defects and had no adverse effect on chondrogenic differentiation [83].

7. Ethical and Regulatory Points for Developing Autologous and Allogeneic MSC Products

IPFP-MSCs have several advantages over other types of MSCs for cartilage regeneration. IPFP tissue can be quickly harvested during concomitant orthopedic surgery without bone-marrow aspiration. Although the synovium can also be harvested during concomitant orthopedic surgery, the volume of the synovium is lesser than that of the IPFP.
The regulation of cell-therapy development to protect donors’ safety and reduce costs is essential. In Japan, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (PMD) Act and the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (ASRM) were established in November 2014. The PMD Act defines regenerative medical products and introduces a system for the conditional and time-limited authorization of marketing of regenerative medical products [84]. For the regulation of cell-therapy programs, the government of Taiwan announced the Regulations of Special Medical Techniques, mainly permitting autologous cell-therapy programs, in September 2018.
Many autologous and allogeneic MSC products have been approved, including the implantation of autologous chondrocytes (ACIs) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI), a technology derived from simple ACI that comprises a two-step arthroscopic procedure that is effective in young patients with focal injuries [85]. CARTISTEM, a combination of human allogenic umbilical cord blood–derived MSCs and sodium hyaluronate, is intended to be used as a single-dose cellular therapeutic agent for cartilage regeneration in patients with cartilage defects [86]. DeNovo NT Graft is an FDA-listed tissue product and a particulate juvenile cartilage allogenic implant used to repair articular-cartilage damage. It provides surgeons with an option for early intervention for articular-cartilage repair [87]. The increasing number of cell products based on autologous and allogeneic MSCs should facilitate the individualization of regenerative therapies.
Allogeneic MSCs are frequently offered worldwide as a universal human remedy. However, undesired differentiation and malignant transformation are major safety issues regarding the transplantation of allogeneic cells. Protocols for the differentiation of MSCs should ensure an allogeneic source tissue, from which MSCs can be isolated safely and efficiently for clinical use. Because allogeneic MSCs may promote tumor growth and metastasis, studies utilizing MSCs should focus on the continuous monitoring and long-term follow up of MSC-treated animal models to determine possible protumorigenic and other detrimental effects of MSC-based therapies [88].

8. The Potential of MSC-Secreted Exosomes

MSCs clearly have therapeutic potential for cartilage repair. However, the sources of MSCs have limitations, and because of variations in donor age and restricted proliferation capacity during in vitro expansion, chondrogenesis is not easy to maintain. Therefore, the need for strict control of MSC isolation, collection, storage, and transportation limits the efficacy of MSC therapies. Moreover, the use of live cells may result in inevitable safety risks such as immune rejection, tumorigenesis due to uncontrolled cell differentiation, and the inability to remove transplanted cells in the case of adverse reactions.
An increasing amount of evidence has indicated that the paracrine effect of MSCs also stimulates cartilage repair [89]. The therapeutic effects of MSCs are mediated by the secretion of essential functional soluble factors present in the EVs released by MSCs. Depending on their size and biogenesis pathways, EVs can be classified into exosomes (30–150 nm), microvesicles (MVs; 100–1000 nm), or apoptotic bodies (1000–5000 nm) [90]. MSC-secreted exosomes are the most commonly studied. Compared with other EVs, MSC-secreted exosomes are more stable under various physiological conditions and are immune-privileged to a certain degree. Thus, MSC-derived exosomes are suitable for therapeutic applications, and they have become popular as a cell-free MSC therapy in the field of cartilage engineering [91]. Exosomes derived from human embryonic MSCs have been reported to stimulate cartilage regeneration [92]; in addition, exosomes derived from BMSCs protect cartilage from degeneration in vivo and in vitro [93]. Moreover, IPFP-MSC-derived exosomes exhibit greater potential for the treatment of OA than do other MSCs; therefore, they should be further optimized for clinical applications.

8.1. Effects of Exosomes from Different MSCs

EVs can deliver specialized messenger molecules as biological signals. The compositions of these molecules are highly dependent on specific conditions. The molecules packed within EVs not only represent the desired messages that contribute to therapy but also include undesirable messages that facilitate the spread of disease [94]. For example, Domenis et al. determined that exosomes derived from OA synovial joint fluid could activate inflammatory cells and stimulate the release of inflammation-related cytokines, chemokines, and metalloproteinases by M1 macrophages [95]. Additional exosome functions have been observed in OA [96]. Therefore, the packaging of exosome content by the secreting cell is programmable and subject to a regulatory mechanism. Exosomes secreted from different unmodified MSCs or conditioned medium-treated MSCs have been reported to have therapeutic value for patients with OA [97].
Exosomes from different cell types may exert different effects on OA, but these effects are still under investigation. Exosomes derived from chondrocytes (CC-Exos) stimulate the proliferation of cartilage progenitor cells and significantly promote the expression of chondrogenesis-related factors. They increase collagen deposition, minimize vascular ingrowth, and efficiently and reproducibly develop into cartilage [98]. Exosomes from BMSCs (BMSC-Exos) repaired cartilage damage in rats with OA by carrying high amounts of miR-135b, thereby, targeting proinflammatory factors upregulated in the serum of rats [99]. Moreover, BMSC-Exos inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis and MMP expression by regulating Drp1-mediated mitophagy [100]. Exosomes from embryonic MSCs (EMSC-Exos) could maintain the chondrocyte phenotype by promoting collagen type II synthesis and decreasing ADAMTS5 expression. EMSC-Exos may contribute to the adenosine-mediated activation of protein kinases, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and insulin growth factor (IGF) [101].
Human synovial MSC–derived exosomes (hSMSC-Exos) stimulate chondrocyte proliferation and migration by inducing the overexpression of WNT5A, leading to the activation of YAP signaling pathways and, ultimately, the suppression of ECM formation [102,103].
Exosomes from SC-ADSCs (ADSC-Exos) may play a chondroprotective role by downregulating senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity as well as reducing the production of inflammatory and catabolic mediators from OA osteoblasts and OA chondrocytes, respectively [104]. Shao demonstrated that chondrocytes treated with exosomes isolated from IPFP-MSCs (IPFP-Exos) exhibited higher SOX-9, aggrecan, and Col II expression and higher performance than did exosomes secreted from IPFP-MSCs pretreated with kartogenin [105].

8.2. Paracrine Role of MSC-Secreted Exosomes in Chondrogenesis

The effects of MSC-based therapies and the chondrogenic potential of MSCs are often attributed to paracrine secretion, particularly the secretion of exosomes. Exosomes have biological functions similar to those of parental cells. Most studies have used MSCs as sources of exosomes because of their major therapeutic benefits for tissue repair and regeneration. Therefore, the interest in exploiting exosomes to mediate cartilage regeneration is growing [106].
Exosomes function primarily as intercellular communication vehicles to transfer bioactive lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins from donor cells into recipient cells to obtain biological responses [89]. Exosomes that mediate the paracrine effect of MSCs effectively protect cartilage [107]. These biological responses translate to therapeutic outcomes in injured cartilage or in the microenvironments of tissues affected by MSC-derived exosomes. Exosome therapy can protect articular chondrocytes from apoptosis induced by H2O2. Exosomes isolated from ADSCs suppress the expression of IL-6, NF-κB, and TNF-α and promote the expression of IL-10. In addition, exosome therapy promotes the chondrogenesis of periosteal cells and increases type II collagen and β-catenin levels [108].

8.3. MSC Exosomal MiRNA Therapy in Cartilage Protection

Exosomes serve as carriers of various biomolecules, including DNA, mRNA, miRNAs, proteins, and lipids, between cells, thereby, modulating biological processes and contributing to cell–cell communication as well as influencing the progression of various diseases. Transcription factors are regulated by the expression of miRNAs and cellular markers, as indicated in Figure 3.
An analysis of periosteal cells treated with exosomes revealed that high levels of miR-145 and miR-221 are related to the enhanced proliferation of periosteal cells and chondrogenic potential, respectively [108]. MiR-100-5p derived from IPFP-MSCs can significantly enhance the autophagy of chondrocytes through mTOR inhibition. The intra-articular injection of antagomir-100-5p protected cartilage and ameliorated the gait patterns of mice with DMM-induced OA by inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis through the mTOR–autophagy pathway [109]. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial MSCs could stimulate cartilage regeneration and delay knee OA progression in a rat OA model [110]. Exosomes derived from human miR-92a-3p-overexpressing BMSCs inhibited cartilage degradation in a collagenase-induced OA mouse model by directly targeting WNT5A and maintaining the function of articular chondrocytes [111]. In addition, TUG1 modulates chondrocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and IL-1β-induced ECM degradation in human cartilage C28/I2 cells via the miR-320c/FUT4 axis. The upregulation of TUG1 in OA tissues is modulated by miR-320 [112]. In a rat OA model, TGF-β1 promoted chondrocyte proliferation by regulating Sp1 through BMSC-exosome-derived miR-135b and promoted cartilage repair [113] (Table 2). Taken together, these results indicate that miRNA regulation is involved in modulating gene expression during chondrogenic differentiation. The validation of these miRNAs and their targets may facilitate further research on safe and efficient novel delivery systems that may promote the use of miRNAs in OA therapy.
Chondrogenic differentiation is initiated by the chondrogenic lineage commitment and MSC condensation, proliferation, differentiation (into chondrocytes), and terminal differentiation (into hypertrophic chondrocytes) processes, which is associated with the expression of cartilage-specific genes. ADSCs from the IPFP play a key role in cartilage generation; therefore, investigation and regulation of the chondrogenic differentiation of IPFP-MSCs are necessary to understand and treat degenerative cartilage diseases. In addition, miRNAs are involved in the cartilage differentiation of MSCs and play a pivotal role in cartilage regeneration. Figure 3 summarizes the transcription factors, miRNAs, and markers involved in the chondrogenesis of MSCs.

9. Conclusions

In this review, we discussed the key role of IPFP-MSCs in the disease progression of knee OA and IPFP-MSCs’ strict regulation by transcription factors during chondrogenesis. We also explored the potential applications of exosomes in the treatment of OA because obtaining human IPFP-MSCs from patients with OA through arthroscopic operation is convenient and feasible. In addition, the differentiation of IPFP-MSCs into the chondrocyte lineage can be genetically manipulated and is promoted by specific transcription factors. Studies have explored the integration of transcription factors, including SOX family members, RUNX family members, and Trps1, in the differentiation of MSCs. The overexpression of single or multiple transcription factors in IPFP-MSCs may promote differentiation into the chondrocyte lineage, which can be used for cartilage regeneration.
Exosomes have been discovered to have therapeutic value in the treatment of OA. Exosomes have a relatively long lifespan and can be stably stored at low temperatures for a long time. In addition, exosomes can deliver nucleic acid and protein drugs to target cells and protect the target cells from enzymatic degradation. Therefore, exosomes can be modified to carry specific medicines to meet the needs of particular treatment regimens. To address the safety concerns associated with the limited chondrogenic function of MSCs isolated from older adult donors, experts have generally studied the applications of exosomes in cartilage repair. Herein, we summarized the present studies of exosomes in direct and indirect potential therapeutic strategies for OA, emphasizing the roles of IPFP-MSC-derived exosomes containing miRNAs. IPFP-MSC exosomes also exerted a strong stimulatory effect on chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. IPFP-MSC exosomes may represent a novel therapeutic approach for OA treatment in future clinical settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-J.L., C.-H.C. and H.-T.C.; investigation, H.-J.L. and H.-T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-J.L.; writing—review and editing, H.-J.L., C.-H.C. and H.-T.C.; supervision, C.-Y.F.H., C.-H.C. and H.-T.C.; project administration, C.-Y.F.H., C.-H.C. and H.-T.C.; funding acquisition, C.-Y.F.H., C.-H.C. and H.-T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology Grants [108-2314-B-418-010-MY3], [109-2314-B-239-001-MY3] and [109-2923-M-010-001-MY3], FEMH [2021-C-005], FEMH [2022-C-042], FEMH [2022-C-123], NYCU-FEMH Cooperation [109DN24] and [110DN22].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brittberg, M.; Lindahl, A.; Nilsson, A.; Ohlsson, C.; Isaksson, O.; Peterson, L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 331, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Falah, M.; Nierenberg, G.; Soudry, M.; Hayden, M.; Volpin, G. Treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Int. Orthop. 2010, 34, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ko, J.Y.; Kim, K.I.; Park, S.; Im, G.I. In vitro chondrogenesis and in vivo repair of osteochondral defect with human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3571–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lefebvre, V.; Li, P.; de Crombrugghe, B. A new long form of Sox5 (L-Sox5), Sox6 and Sox9 are coexpressed in chondrogenesis and cooperatively activate the type II collagen gene. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 5718–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lefebvre, V.; Smits, P. Transcriptional control of chondrocyte fate and differentiation. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 2005, 75, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huri, P.Y.; Hamsici, S.; Ergene, E.; Huri, G.; Doral, M.N. Infrapatellar Fat Pad-Derived Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Strategies in Orthopedic Surgery. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2018, 30, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ganguly, P.; El-Jawhari, J.J.; Giannoudis, P.V.; Burska, A.N.; Ponchel, F.; Jones, E.A. Age-related Changes in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Potential Impact on Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis Development. Cell Transplant. 2017, 26, 1520–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Maumus, M.; Manferdini, C.; Toupet, K.; Peyrafitte, J.A.; Ferreira, R.; Facchini, A.; Gabusi, E.; Bourin, P.; Jorgensen, C.; Lisignoli, G.; et al. Adipose mesenchymal stem cells protect chondrocytes from degeneration associated with osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res. 2013, 11, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Manferdini, C.; Maumus, M.; Gabusi, E.; Piacentini, A.; Filardo, G.; Peyrafitte, J.A.; Jorgensen, C.; Bourin, P.; Fleury-Cappellesso, S.; Facchini, A.; et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells exert antiinflammatory effects on chondrocytes and synoviocytes from osteoarthritis patients through prostaglandin E2. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 1271–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Thery, C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akiyama, H.; Chaboissier, M.C.; Martin, J.F.; Schedl, A.; de Crombrugghe, B. The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2813–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhou, X.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, X. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Rejuvenation: Current Status and Challenges. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Niazi, V.; Hussen, B.M.; Omrani, M.D.; Taheri, M.; Basiri, A. The Emerging Role of Exosomes in the Treatment of Human Disorders With a Special Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 653296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kronenberg, H.M. Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 2003, 423, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, M.M.; Beier, F. Chondrocyte hypertrophy in skeletal development, growth, and disease. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 2014, 102, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kielty, C.M.; Kwan, A.P.; Holmes, D.F.; Schor, S.L.; Grant, M.E. Type X collagen, a product of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Biochem. J. 1985, 227, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Vortkamp, A.; Lee, K.; Lanske, B.; Segre, G.V.; Kronenberg, H.M.; Tabin, C.J. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 1996, 273, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johansson, N.; Saarialho-Kere, U.; Airola, K.; Herva, R.; Nissinen, L.; Westermarck, J.; Vuorio, E.; Heino, J.; Kahari, V.M. Collagenase-3 (MMP-13) is expressed by hypertrophic chondrocytes, periosteal cells, and osteoblasts during human fetal bone development. Dev. Dyn. 1997, 208, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barter, M.J.; Gomez, R.; Hyatt, S.; Cheung, K.; Skelton, A.J.; Xu, Y.; Clark, I.M.; Young, D.A. The long non-coding RNA ROCR contributes to SOX9 expression and chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Development 2017, 144, 4510–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ikeda, T.; Kamekura, S.; Mabuchi, A.; Kou, I.; Seki, S.; Takato, T.; Nakamura, K.; Kawaguchi, H.; Ikegawa, S.; Chung, U.I. The combination of SOX5, SOX6, and SOX9 (the SOX trio) provides signals sufficient for induction of permanent cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 3561–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ghosh, S.; Laha, M.; Mondal, S.; Sengupta, S.; Kaplan, D.L. In vitro model of mesenchymal condensation during chondrogenic development. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6530–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mori-Akiyama, Y.; Akiyama, H.; Rowitch, D.H.; de Crombrugghe, B. Sox9 is required for determination of the chondrogenic cell lineage in the cranial neural crest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9360–9365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Quintana, L.; zur Nieden, N.I.; Semino, C.E. Morphogenetic and regulatory mechanisms during developmental chondrogenesis: New paradigms for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2009, 15, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bi, W.; Deng, J.M.; Zhang, Z.; Behringer, R.R.; de Crombrugghe, B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, C.F.; Lefebvre, V. The transcription factors SOX9 and SOX5/SOX6 cooperate genome-wide through super-enhancers to drive chondrogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8183–8203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Han, Y.; Lefebvre, V. L-Sox5 and Sox6 drive expression of the aggrecan gene in cartilage by securing binding of Sox9 to a far-upstream enhancer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 4999–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Smits, P.; Li, P.; Mandel, J.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, J.M.; Behringer, R.R.; de Crombrugghe, B.; Lefebvre, V. The transcription factors L-Sox5 and Sox6 are essential for cartilage formation. Dev. Cell 2001, 1, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, Y.; Belflower, R.M.; Dong, Y.F.; Schwarz, E.M.; O’Keefe, R.J.; Drissi, H. Runx1/AML1/Cbfa2 mediates onset of mesenchymal cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005, 20, 1624–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lian, J.B.; Balint, E.; Javed, A.; Drissi, H.; Vitti, R.; Quinlan, E.J.; Zhang, L.; Van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, J.L.; Speck, N.; et al. Runx1/AML1 hematopoietic transcription factor contributes to skeletal development in vivo. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 196, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yano, F.; Hojo, H.; Ohba, S.; Fukai, A.; Hosaka, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Saito, T.; Hirata, M.; Chikuda, H.; Takato, T.; et al. A novel disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug candidate targeting Runx1. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aini, H.; Itaka, K.; Fujisawa, A.; Uchida, H.; Uchida, S.; Fukushima, S.; Kataoka, K.; Saito, T.; Chung, U.I.; Ohba, S. Messenger RNA delivery of a cartilage-anabolic transcription factor as a disease-modifying strategy for osteoarthritis treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Higashikawa, A.; Saito, T.; Ikeda, T.; Kamekura, S.; Kawamura, N.; Kan, A.; Oshima, Y.; Ohba, S.; Ogata, N.; Takeshita, K.; et al. Identification of the core element responsive to runt-related transcription factor 2 in the promoter of human type X collagen gene. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kamekura, S.; Kawasaki, Y.; Hoshi, K.; Shimoaka, T.; Chikuda, H.; Maruyama, Z.; Komori, T.; Sato, S.; Takeda, S.; Karsenty, G.; et al. Contribution of runt-related transcription factor 2 to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in mice after induction of knee joint instability. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2462–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Komori, T.; Yagi, H.; Nomura, S.; Yamaguchi, A.; Sasaki, K.; Deguchi, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Bronson, R.T.; Gao, Y.H.; Inada, M.; et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997, 89, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Liao, L.; Zhang, S.; Gu, J.; Takarada, T.; Yoneda, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, L.; Oh, C.D.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; et al. Deletion of Runx2 in Articular Chondrocytes Decelerates the Progression of DMM-Induced Osteoarthritis in Adult Mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hinoi, E.; Bialek, P.; Chen, Y.T.; Rached, M.T.; Groner, Y.; Behringer, R.R.; Ornitz, D.M.; Karsenty, G. Runx2 inhibits chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophy though its expression in the perichondrium. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 2937–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yoshida, C.A.; Komori, T. Role of Runx proteins in chondrogenesis. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Exp. 2005, 15, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dreher, S.I.; Fischer, J.; Walker, T.; Diederichs, S.; Richter, W. Significance of MEF2C and RUNX3 Regulation for Endochondral Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Arnold, M.A.; Kim, Y.; Czubryt, M.P.; Phan, D.; McAnally, J.; Qi, X.; Shelton, J.M.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. MEF2C transcription factor controls chondrocyte hypertrophy and bone development. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wuelling, M.; Kaiser, F.J.; Buelens, L.A.; Braunholz, D.; Shivdasani, R.A.; Depping, R.; Vortkamp, A. Trps1, a regulator of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation, interacts with the activator form of Gli3. Dev. Biol. 2009, 328, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Suemoto, H.; Muragaki, Y.; Nishioka, K.; Sato, M.; Ooshima, A.; Itoh, S.; Hatamura, I.; Ozaki, M.; Braun, A.; Gustafsson, E.; et al. Trps1 regulates proliferation and apoptosis of chondrocytes through Stat3 signaling. Dev. Biol. 2007, 312, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Nishioka, K.; Itoh, S.; Suemoto, H.; Kanno, S.; Gai, Z.; Kawakatsu, M.; Tanishima, H.; Morimoto, Y.; Hatamura, I.; Yoshida, M.; et al. Trps1 deficiency enlarges the proliferative zone of growth plate cartilage by upregulation of Pthrp. Bone 2008, 43, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lolli, A.; Lambertini, E.; Penolazzi, L.; Angelozzi, M.; Morganti, C.; Franceschetti, T.; Pelucchi, S.; Gambari, R.; Piva, R. Pro-chondrogenic effect of miR-221 and slug depletion in human MSCs. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2014, 10, 841–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, Y.; Xie, R.L.; Gordon, J.; LeBlanc, K.; Stein, J.L.; Lian, J.B.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, G.S. Control of mesenchymal lineage progression by microRNAs targeting skeletal gene regulators Trps1 and Runx2. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 21926–21935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gao, F.; Peng, C.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, S.; Wu, M. miRNA-101 promotes chondrogenic differentiation in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 17, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ukai, T.; Sato, M.; Akutsu, H.; Umezawa, A.; Mochida, J. MicroRNA-199a-3p, microRNA-193b, and microRNA-320c are correlated to aging and regulate human cartilage metabolism. J. Orthop. Res. 2012, 30, 1915–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yamashita, S.; Miyaki, S.; Kato, Y.; Yokoyama, S.; Sato, T.; Barrionuevo, F.; Akiyama, H.; Scherer, G.; Takada, S.; Asahara, H. L-Sox5 and Sox6 proteins enhance chondrogenic miR-140 microRNA expression by strengthening dimeric Sox9 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 22206–22215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hou, C.; Meng, F.; Zhang, Z.; Kang, Y.; Chen, W.; Huang, G.; Fu, M.; Sheng, P.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, W. The Role of MicroRNA-381 in Chondrogenesis and Interleukin-1-beta Induced Chondrocyte Responses. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 36, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dai, L.; Zhang, X.; Hu, X.; Zhou, C.; Ao, Y. Silencing of microRNA-101 prevents IL-1beta-induced extracellular matrix degradation in chondrocytes. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yang, B.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Ying, D.; Dong, S. MicroRNA-145 regulates chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by targeting Sox9. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martinez-Sanchez, A.; Dudek, K.A.; Murphy, C.L. Regulation of human chondrocyte function through direct inhibition of cartilage master regulator SOX9 by microRNA-145 (miRNA-145). J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Xu, J.; Kang, Y.; Liao, W.M.; Yu, L. MiR-194 regulates chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by targeting Sox5. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, J.; Wu, X. MicroRNA-103 contributes to osteoarthritis development by targeting Sox6. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 118, 109186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, X.; Meng, F.; Hu, S.; Yang, Z.; Huang, H.; Pang, R.; Wen, X.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, Z. The Synovium Attenuates Cartilage Degeneration in KOA through Activation of the Smad2/3-Runx1 Cascade and Chondrogenesis-related miRNAs. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 22, 832–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ji, Q.; Xu, X.; Xu, Y.; Fan, Z.; Kang, L.; Li, L.; Liang, Y.; Guo, J.; Hong, T.; Li, Z.; et al. miR-105/Runx2 axis mediates FGF2-induced ADAMTS expression in osteoarthritis cartilage. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Xie, R.L.; Croce, C.M.; Stein, J.L.; Lian, J.B.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, G.S. A program of microRNAs controls osteogenic lineage progression by targeting transcription factor Runx2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9863–9868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, Z.; Hou, C.; Meng, F.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, G.; Chen, W.; Fu, M.; Liao, W. MiR-455-3p regulates early chondrogenic differentiation via inhibiting Runx2. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 3671–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Park, S.; Bello, A.; Arai, Y.; Ahn, J.; Kim, D.; Cha, K.Y.; Baek, I.; Park, H.; Lee, S.H. Functional Duality of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Biomedical Application Trends in Osteoarthritis. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Murray, D.; Precht, P.; Balakir, R.; Horton, W.E., Jr. The transcription factor deltaEF1 is inversely expressed with type II collagen mRNA and can repress Col2a1 promoter activity in transfected chondrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 3610–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Seki, K.; Fujimori, T.; Savagner, P.; Hata, A.; Aikawa, T.; Ogata, N.; Nabeshima, Y.; Kaechoong, L. Mouse Snail family transcription repressors regulate chondrocyte, extracellular matrix, type II collagen, and aggrecan. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 41862–41870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Huang, Z.; Xu, H.; Sandell, L. Negative regulation of chondrocyte differentiation by transcription factor AP-2alpha. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Reinhold, M.I.; Kapadia, R.M.; Liao, Z.; Naski, M.C. The Wnt-inducible transcription factor Twist1 inhibits chondrogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ushijima, T.; Okazaki, K.; Tsushima, H.; Iwamoto, Y. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta regulates the repression of type II collagen expression during the differentiation from proliferative to hypertrophic chondrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2852–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, H.T.; Lee, M.J.; Chen, C.H.; Chuang, S.C.; Chang, L.F.; Ho, M.L.; Hung, S.H.; Fu, Y.C.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, H.I.; et al. Proliferation and differentiation potential of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells isolated from elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 582–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Roelofs, A.J.; Zupan, J.; Riemen, A.H.K.; Kania, K.; Ansboro, S.; White, N.; Clark, S.M.; De Bari, C. Joint morphogenetic cells in the adult mammalian synovium. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Jones, B.A.; Pei, M. Synovium-derived stem cells: A tissue-specific stem cell for cartilage engineering and regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2012, 18, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mochizuki, T.; Muneta, T.; Sakaguchi, Y.; Nimura, A.; Yokoyama, A.; Koga, H.; Sekiya, I. Higher chondrogenic potential of fibrous synovium- and adipose synovium-derived cells compared with subcutaneous fat-derived cells: Distinguishing properties of mesenchymal stem cells in humans. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, N.; Gao, J.; Mi, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, N.; Huo, R.; Hu, J.; Xu, K. Synovial membrane mesenchymal stem cells: Past life, current situation, and application in bone and joint diseases. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qiao, K.; Chen, Q.; Cao, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, G.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Tian, K.; Zhang, W. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Articular Cartilage Lesions and Degenerative Joint Diseases. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 698614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gierman, L.M.; Wopereis, S.; van El, B.; Verheij, E.R.; Werff-van der Vat, B.J.; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M.; van Osch, G.J.; Kloppenburg, M.; Stojanovic-Susulic, V.; Huizinga, T.W.; et al. Metabolic profiling reveals differences in concentrations of oxylipins and fatty acids secreted by the infrapatellar fat pad of donors with end-stage osteoarthritis and normal donors. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 2606–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M.; Clockaerts, S.; Feijt, C.; Zuurmond, A.M.; Stojanovic-Susulic, V.; Bridts, C.; de Clerck, L.; DeGroot, J.; Verhaar, J.A.; Kloppenburg, M.; et al. Infrapatellar fat pad of patients with end-stage osteoarthritis inhibits catabolic mediators in cartilage. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dumond, H.; Presle, N.; Terlain, B.; Mainard, D.; Loeuille, D.; Netter, P.; Pottie, P. Evidence for a key role of leptin in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48, 3118–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bao, J.P.; Chen, W.P.; Feng, J.; Hu, P.F.; Shi, Z.L.; Wu, L.D. Leptin plays a catabolic role on articular cartilage. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 3265–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. do Amaral, R.; Almeida, H.V.; Kelly, D.J.; O’Brien, F.J.; Kearney, C.J. Infrapatellar Fat Pad Stem Cells: From Developmental Biology to Cell Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 6843727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chen, H.H.; Chen, Y.C.; Yu, S.N.; Lai, W.L.; Shen, Y.S.; Shen, P.C.; Lin, S.H.; Chang, C.H.; Lee, S.M. Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stromal cell product for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A first-in-human study with evaluation of the potency marker. Cytotherapy 2021, 24, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Koh, Y.G.; Jo, S.B.; Kwon, O.R.; Suh, D.S.; Lee, S.W.; Park, S.H.; Choi, Y.J. Mesenchymal stem cell injections improve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy 2013, 29, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, Y.; Chen, S.; Pei, M. Comparative advantages of infrapatellar fat pad: An emerging stem cell source for regenerative medicine. Rheumatology 2018, 57, 2072–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Roffi, A.; Nakamura, N.; Sanchez, M.; Cucchiarini, M.; Filardo, G. Injectable Systems for Intra-Articular Delivery of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Cartilage Treatment: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Desando, G.; Bartolotti, I.; Cavallo, C.; Schiavinato, A.; Secchieri, C.; Kon, E.; Filardo, G.; Paro, M.; Grigolo, B. Short-Term Homing of Hyaluronan-Primed Cells: Therapeutic Implications for Osteoarthritis Treatment. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2018, 24, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, S.; Song, X.; Li, T.; Xiao, J.; Chen, Y.; Gong, X.; Zeng, W.; Yang, L.; Chen, C. Pellet coculture of osteoarthritic chondrocytes and infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells with chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles promotes chondrogenic differentiation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Buckley, C.T.; Vinardell, T.; Thorpe, S.D.; Haugh, M.G.; Jones, E.; McGonagle, D.; Kelly, D.J. Functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered from infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomech. 2010, 43, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ahearne, M.; Buckley, C.T.; Kelly, D.J. A growth factor delivery system for chondrogenic induction of infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells in fibrin hydrogels. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2011, 58, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kamei, G.; Kobayashi, T.; Ohkawa, S.; Kongcharoensombat, W.; Adachi, N.; Takazawa, K.; Shibuya, H.; Deie, M.; Hattori, K.; Goldberg, J.L.; et al. Articular cartilage repair with magnetic mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Sports Med. 2013, 41, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maeda, D.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ishizuka, T.; Hirata, M.; Takekita, K.; Sato, D. Regulatory Frameworks for Gene and Cell Therapies in Japan. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 871, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Andia, I.; Maffulli, N. Mesenchymal stromal cell products for intra-articular knee injections for conservative management of osteoarthritis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2021, 13, 1759720X21996953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Park, Y.B.; Ha, C.W.; Lee, C.H.; Yoon, Y.C.; Park, Y.G. Cartilage Regeneration in Osteoarthritic Patients by a Composite of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Hyaluronate Hydrogel: Results from a Clinical Trial for Safety and Proof-of-Concept with 7 Years of Extended Follow-Up. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hadley, C.J.; Shi, W.J.; Murphy, H.; Tjoumakaris, F.P.; Salvo, J.P.; Freedman, K.B. The Clinical Evidence Behind Biologic Therapies Promoted at Annual Orthopaedic Meetings: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2019, 35, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pittenger, M.F.; Discher, D.E.; Peault, B.M.; Phinney, D.G.; Hare, J.M.; Caplan, A.I. Mesenchymal stem cell perspective: Cell biology to clinical progress. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Toh, W.S.; Lai, R.C.; Hui, J.H.P.; Lim, S.K. MSC exosome as a cell-free MSC therapy for cartilage regeneration: Implications for osteoarthritis treatment. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 67, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kourembanas, S. Exosomes: Vehicles of intercellular signaling, biomarkers, and vectors of cell therapy. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Bjorge, I.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Mano, J.F.; Kalionis, B.; Chrzanowski, W. Extracellular vesicles, exosomes and shedding vesicles in regenerative medicine—A new paradigm for tissue repair. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 6, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhang, S.; Chu, W.C.; Lai, R.C.; Lim, S.K.; Hui, J.H.; Toh, W.S. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016, 24, 2135–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, S.; Chuah, S.J.; Lai, R.C.; Hui, J.H.P.; Lim, S.K.; Toh, W.S. MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials 2018, 156, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nomura, S. Extracellular vesicles and blood diseases. Int. J. Hematol. 2017, 105, 392–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Domenix, R.; Zanutel, R.; Caponnetto, F.; Toffoletto, B.; Cifu, A.; Pistis, C.; Di Benedetto, P.; Causero, A.; Pozzi, M.; Bassini, F.; et al. Characterization of the Proinflammatory Profile of Synovial Fluid-Derived Exosomes of patients with Osteorarthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 4814987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bao, C.; He, C. The role and therapeutic potential of MSC-derived exosomes in osteoarthritis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2021, 710, 109002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhou, Q.; Cai, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Lin, X. Exosomes in osteoarthritis and cartilage injury: Advanced development and potential therapeutic strategies. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1811–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Chen, Y.; Xue, K.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, K. Exosomes derived from mature chondrocytes facilitate subcutaneous stable ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Wang, R.; Xu, B. TGF-beta1-modified MSC-derived exosomal miR-135b attenuates cartilage injury via promoting M2 synovial macrophage polarization by targeting MAPK6. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 384, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tang, S.; Tang, T.; Gao, G.; Wei, Q.; Sun, K.; Huang, W. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis and the expression of MMPs by regulating Drp1-mediated mitophagy. Acta Histochem. 2021, 123, 151796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, Y.; Yu, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, F.; Dai, J.; Wu, B.; Zhou, J.; Heng, B.C.; Zou, X.H.; Ouyang, H.; et al. Exosomes from embryonic mesenchymal stem cells alleviate osteoarthritis through balancing synthesis and degradation of cartilage extracellular matrix. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Wang, Z.; Yan, K.; Ge, G.; Zhang, D.; Bai, J.; Guo, X.; Zhou, J.; Xu, T.; Xu, M.; Long, X.; et al. Exosomes derived from miR-155-5p-overexpressing synovial mesenchymal stem cells prevent osteoarthritis via enhancing proliferation and migration, attenuating apoptosis, and modulating extracellular matrix secretion in chondrocytes. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2021, 37, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pourakbari, R.; Khodadadi, M.; Aghebati-Maleki, A.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Yousefi, M. The potential of exosomes in the therapy of the cartilage and bone complications; emphasis on osteoarthritis. Life Sci. 2019, 236, 116861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tofino-Vian, M.; Guillen, M.I.; Perez Del Caz, M.D.; Castejon, M.A.; Alcaraz, M.J. Extracellular Vesicles from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Downregulate Senescence Features in Osteoarthritic Osteoblasts. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 7197598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Shao, J.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Y.; Fu, Q.; Li, L.; Ding, Z.; Wu, J.; Han, Y.; Li, H.; Qian, Q.; et al. Exosomes from Kartogenin-Pretreated Infrapatellar Fat Pad Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Chondrocyte Anabolism and Articular Cartilage Regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 6624874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lin, Y.; Anderson, J.D.; Rahnama, L.M.A.; Gu, S.V.; Knowlton, A.A. Exosomes in disease and regeneration: Biological functions, diagnostics, and beneficial effects. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020, 319, H1162–H1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Niu, X.; Zhao, B.; Wang, Y.; Bao, C.; Xie, Z.; Lin, Q.; Zhu, L. Integration of stem cell-derived exosomes with in situ hydrogel glue as a promising tissue patch for articular cartilage regeneration. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4430–4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zhao, C.; Chen, J.Y.; Peng, W.M.; Yuan, B.; Bi, Q.; Xu, Y.J. Exosomes from adiposederived stem cells promote chondrogenesis and suppress inflammation by upregulating miR145 and miR221. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 1881–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Wu, J.; Kuang, L.; Chen, C.; Yang, J.; Zeng, W.N.; Li, T.; Chen, H.; Huang, S.; Fu, Z.; Li, J.; et al. miR-100-5p-abundant exosomes derived from infrapatellar fat pad MSCs protect articular cartilage and ameliorate gait abnormalities via inhibition of mTOR in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 2019, 206, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tao, S.C.; Yuan, T.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yin, W.J.; Guo, S.C.; Zhang, C.Q. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model. Theranostics 2017, 7, 180–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Chang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Liao, W.; Kang, Y. Exosomes derived from miR-92a-3p-overexpressing human mesenchymal stem cells enhance chondrogenesis and suppress cartilage degradation via targeting WNT5A. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Han, H.; Liu, L. Long noncoding RNA TUG1 regulates degradation of chondrocyte extracellular matrix via miR-320c/MMP-13 axis in osteoarthritis. Open Life Sci. 2021, 16, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wang, R.; Xu, B.; Xu, H. TGF-beta1 promoted chondrocyte proliferation by regulating Sp1 through MSC-exosomes derived miR-135b. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1556063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 12 00386 g001 550
Figure 1. Primary sources of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in treating OA: infrapatellar fat pad–derived mesenchymal stem cells (IPFP-MSCs) and subcutaneous ADSCs.
Figure 1. Primary sources of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in treating OA: infrapatellar fat pad–derived mesenchymal stem cells (IPFP-MSCs) and subcutaneous ADSCs.
Biomolecules 12 00386 g001
Biomolecules 12 00386 g002 550
Figure 2. Key stages of chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Figure 2. Key stages of chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Biomolecules 12 00386 g002
Biomolecules 12 00386 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic illustrating transcription factors and miRNA regulators involved in chondrocyte differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). Abbreviations: sex-determining region Y–related high-mobility group box 9 (SOX9); trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1); runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2); hypoxia inducible factor (HIF); histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4); myocyte enhancer factor 2c (MEF2c); osterix (Osx); C-musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma (cMaf); cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP); transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β); neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM); type II procollagen (Col2a1); type IX collagen alpha 1 chain (Col9a1); type XI collagen (Col11a1); Indian hedgehog (Ihh); matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13); type X collagen (Col10a1).
Figure 3. Schematic illustrating transcription factors and miRNA regulators involved in chondrocyte differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). Abbreviations: sex-determining region Y–related high-mobility group box 9 (SOX9); trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1); runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2); hypoxia inducible factor (HIF); histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4); myocyte enhancer factor 2c (MEF2c); osterix (Osx); C-musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma (cMaf); cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP); transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β); neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM); type II procollagen (Col2a1); type IX collagen alpha 1 chain (Col9a1); type XI collagen (Col11a1); Indian hedgehog (Ihh); matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13); type X collagen (Col10a1).
Biomolecules 12 00386 g003
Table
Table 1. MicroRNAs involved in transcription factor regulation during chondrogenesis.
Table 1. MicroRNAs involved in transcription factor regulation during chondrogenesis.
miRNATranscription FactorEffect on ChondrogenesisCell Type/ConditionStudy ModelReference
miR-101Sox9(+)Rat BMSCsmiR-101 increases expression of Sox9 and decreases expression of Runx2.[45]
miR-193bSOX9(+)Human ChondrocytesMaintenance of chondrocytes and ECM homeostasis.[46]
miR-140Sox9(+)Mouse EmbryomiR-140 proximal promoter activity and miR-140 expression are upregulated by Sox9 in chondrocytes.
miR-140 was identified as a cartilage-specific microRNA that could be a critical regulator of cartilage development and homeostasis in genetically modified mice.		[47]
miR-381Sox9(+)Mouse ChondrocytesmiR-381 is highly expressed during chondrogenesis and in arthritic cartilage.
Runx2 and Sox9 upregulate expression of miR-381.		[48]
miR-101Sox9(−)Rat ChondrocytesmiR-101 participates in IL-1β-induced chondrocyte ECM degradation.[49]
miR-145Sox9(−)Murine BMSCsmiR-145 is a key negative regulator of chondrogenic differentiation that directly targets Sox9 at early stages of chondrogenic differentiation.[50]
miR-145SOX9(−)Human ChondrocytesmiR-145 negatively regulates endogenous SOX9 expression in human articular chondrocytes.[51]
miR-194SOX5(−)Human ADSCsMiR-194 inhibits SOX5 expression and inhibits early chondrogenic differentiation.[52]
miR-103SOX6(−)Human Primary ChondrocytesmiR-103 promotion of osteoarthritis is mediated by downregulation of SOX6.[53]
miR-455, miR-210RUNX1(+)Human SynoviocytesRUNX1 can bind to the promoter regions of miR-455 and miR-210 and protects the synovium against cartilage degeneration.[54]
miR-105RUNX2(+)Human Primary ChondrocytesRUNX2, a key transcription factor involved in OA progression, has been identified as a direct target of miR-105.[55]
A panel of miRNAs (miR-23a, -30c, -34c, -133a, -135a, -137, -204, -205, -217, -218, -338)Runx2(+)Mouse Chondroprogenitor
Cell Line ATDC5		Promotion of early chondrogenic differentiation and suppression of chondrocyte maturation.[56]
miR-455-3pRunx2(−)Mouse Chondroprogenitor
Cell Line ATDC5		MiR-455-3p induces early chondrogenesis by inhibiting Runx2.[57]
-Runx3----
miR-500, miR-298Trps1(−)Mouse Chondroprogenitor
Cell Line ATDC5		Trps1 inhibits the expression of miR-500 and miR-298, which controls the chondrocyte hypertrophy transcription factor Mef2c.[39]
Table
Table 2. MicroRNAs involved in cartilage regeneration.
Table 2. MicroRNAs involved in cartilage regeneration.
miRNACellSourceSpeciesMechanismFunctionReference
miR-100-5pADSCIPFPHumanMiR-100-5p promotes autophagy of chondrocytes through mTOR inhibition.MiR-100-5p protects cartilage from damage in mice with destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery-induced OA.[109]
miR-140-5pSMSCSynovial MembraneHumanSMSC-Exos activate yes-associated proteins, decreases ECM secretion, and induces proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes via WNT5A and WNT5B.SMSC-140-Exos enhance the proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes without damaging ECM secretion in vitro; in vivo, SMSC-140-Exos successfully prevented OA in a rat model.[110]
miR-92-3pBMSCBone MarrowHumanExosomal miR-92a-3p regulates cartilage development and homeostasis by directly targeting WNT5A.MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exos inhibited cartilage degradation in an OA mouse model.[111]
miR-320cBMSCBone MarrowHumanTUG1 modulates chondrocyte proliferation and apoptosis and ECM degradation in IL-1β-induced C28/I2 cells via the miR-320c/FUT4 axis. miR-320c upregulates TUG1 in OA tissues and is modulated by miR-320.[112]
miR-135bBMSCBone MarrowRatTGF-β1 promotes chondrocyte proliferation by regulating Sp1 through MSC-exosome-derived miR-135b and then promotes cartilage repair.TGF-β1 promotes cartilage repair by regulating Sp1 through miR-135b in vivo.[113]
Abbreviations: synovial mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs); adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs); bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); exosomes (Exos).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, H.-J.; Chang, C.-H.; Huang, C.-Y.F.; Chen, H.-T. Potential of Using Infrapatellar–Fat–Pad–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapy in Degenerative Arthritis: Chondrogenesis, Exosomes, and Transcription Regulation. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030386

AMA Style

Liao H-J, Chang C-H, Huang C-YF, Chen H-T. Potential of Using Infrapatellar–Fat–Pad–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapy in Degenerative Arthritis: Chondrogenesis, Exosomes, and Transcription Regulation. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(3):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Hsiu-Jung, Chih-Hung Chang, Chi-Ying F. Huang, and Hui-Ting Chen. 2022. "Potential of Using Infrapatellar–Fat–Pad–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Therapy in Degenerative Arthritis: Chondrogenesis, Exosomes, and Transcription Regulation" Biomolecules 12, no. 3: 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop