Next Article in Journal
Phosphorylation of RCC1 on Serine 11 Facilitates G1/S Transition in HPV E7-Expressing Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
C-KIT Expression in Orbital Cavernous Venous Hemangiomas
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19: Unmasking Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Vaccines and Therapeutic Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Thrombin in Central Nervous System Injury and Disease
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Role of Purinergic Signalling in Endothelial Dysfunction and Thrombo-Inflammation in Ischaemic Stroke and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Biomolecules 2021, 11(7), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070994
by Natasha Ting Lee 1, Lin Kooi Ong 2,3,4,5,6, Prajwal Gyawali 7, Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir 8, Muzaimi Mustapha 8, Harshal H. Nandurkar 1 and Maithili Sashindranath 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomolecules 2021, 11(7), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070994
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 6 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomolecules in Neuro-ThromboInflammation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors reviewed the role of purinergic signaling in endothelial dysfunction and thrombo-inflammation in brain ischaemic diseases. Overall the article is well written. The topic is interesting and clearly discussed, the context is easy to follow.

Author Response

Thank you for your timely review. 

Reviewer 2 Report

This review summarized functional and morphological changes of endothelium under the pathophysiological conditions such as ischemia and cerebral small vessel disease, and especially focused on the role of purinergic signalling in it. The content is simple and easy to understand. I have several minor concerns as follows.

 

Minor comments

1) P3, L108. The mechanisms underlying that decreased erythrocyte deformability decreases NO activity should be described with adequate references.

 

2) P3, L109 and P4, L163. The term “bioavailability” is inadequate for endogenous NO. “Bioavailability” is used for exogenous drugs.

 

3) P3, L133. What “change” do authors mean? Functional or morphological or others? The term “change” is too simple. Explain it more in detail.

 

4) P4, L167. Do authors mean “ The endothelium is further dysregulated” or “The endothelium further dysregulates something”?

 

5) P6 Figure 1. There are several cells other than endothelial cells (astrocyte, neuron ?) in the figure. These cells should be mentioned in the legend.

 

6) P6, L233. “subsequently and reduction” should be “subsequently reduction”.

 

7) P6, L241. Do the authors mean “induce the expression of …..”?

 

8) P6, L241. “Cytochrome C, Phospholipase A2, and Cyclooxygenase” should be “cytochrome C, phospholipase A2, and cyclooxygenase”

 

9) P7, L279. Are the references [69] and [70] correct? Looking at the contents, is the citation reversed?

 

10) P7, L290. What the term “In contrast” indicates?

 

11) P8, L306. CD39 does not convert ATP into adenosine. It should be “convert ATP/ADP into AMP”.

 

12) P10, L376. Do the authors mean “…….therapies include…..” or “………inhibitors are reported” or others ?

Author Response

Thank you for your review. Please see our itemised response in the attached document. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop