Next Article in Journal
The Many Faces of Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 in Kidney Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Potential Roles of Abscisic Acid and Polyphenols in Adaptation of Onobrychis viciifolia to Extreme Environmental Conditions in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
The Hyperoxic-Hypoxic Paradox
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ethylene: A Master Regulator of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants

1
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
2
Doctoral School in Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
3
Department of Biotechnology, Visva-Bharati Central University, Santiniketan, West Bengal 731235, India
4
School of Biotechnology, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201312, India
5
Department of Integrated Plant Protection, Plant Protection Institute, Faculty of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István University, Páter Károly utca 1, H-2100 Gödöllo, Hungary
6
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India
7
Louvain Institute of Biomolecular Science, Catholic University of Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
8
Department of Plant Bioscience, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
9
Department of Botany, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi 110062, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(6), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060959
Received: 31 May 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytohormones 2020)

Abstract

:
Salinity stress is one of the major threats to agricultural productivity across the globe. Research in the past three decades, therefore, has focused on analyzing the effects of salinity stress on the plants. Evidence gathered over the years supports the role of ethylene as a key regulator of salinity stress tolerance in plants. This gaseous plant hormone regulates many vital cellular processes starting from seed germination to photosynthesis for maintaining the plants’ growth and yield under salinity stress. Ethylene modulates salinity stress responses largely via maintaining the homeostasis of Na+/K+, nutrients, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inducing antioxidant defense in addition to elevating the assimilation of nitrates and sulfates. Moreover, a cross-talk of ethylene signaling with other phytohormones has also been observed, which collectively regulate the salinity stress responses in plants. The present review provides a comprehensive update on the prospects of ethylene signaling and its cross-talk with other phytohormones to regulate salinity stress tolerance in plants.

1. Introduction

Ethylene, the first gaseous plant hormone to be identified, is a key regulator of plant growth and development. Although growth-regulating effects of ethylene were first observed in 1901 by a Russian physiologist Dimitry K. Neljubov, ethylene was established as a plant hormone almost 60 years later in 1965 [1]. The biosynthetic pathway of ethylene production was elucidated in 1970–80, while its signaling components were identified in the 1990s after the development of Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system that facilitated the development and screening of genetic mutants [2]. Subsequent studies on ethylene led to the identification of an array of genes and transcriptional factors working downstream that widen our understanding of how this colorless and odorless plant hormone functions [3]. Because of the gaseous nature of ethylene, it can easily diffuse to nearby cells and, therefore, ethylene production predominantly takes place locally at the site of its action. Earlier work showed that ethylene biosynthesis is dramatically induced during fruit ripening and leaf senescence, among others [4]. Ethylene is also well known for its triple response which includes (i) inhibition of hypocotyl and root elongation, (ii) swelling of the hypocotyl, and (iii) exaggerated tightening of the apical hook [5].
In addition to regulating plant growth and development, research in the past two decades has also highlighted the involvement of ethylene in regulating plant responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses [6,7,8,9]. Among different abiotic stresses, ethylene has emerged as one of the important positive mediators for salinity stress tolerance in the model plant A. thaliana as well as in many crop plants including grapevines, maize, and tomato [10,11,12,13]. Salinity stress is one of the major abiotic stresses, posing a major threat to agricultural productivity [14,15]. Globally, more than 20% of irrigated land is affected by salinity stress, resulting in an average yield fall of more than 50% for major crops [16,17]. As per the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 13,003 million hectares (Mha) of the global land area is devoted to agriculture [18] in which soil salinity has adversely affected about 30% of the irrigated land and 6% of the total land area [19,20], resulting in a monetary loss of approximately 27.3 billion USD per year [21]. Plants growing in geographically over-salted soils in areas where hydraulic lifting of saline underground water occurs and in coastal areas are frequently exposed to salinity stress [22]. The decline of farmable land due to salinity is a major concern for food security in the current and future scenario of a growing population which has been estimated to reach 8.5 billion over the next 25 years [23]. Salinity stress is exerted because of excess of one or more salt ions in the soil including sodium (Na+), bicarbonate (HCO3), magnesium (Mg2+), sulfate (SO4−2), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl), calcium (Ca2+), and carbonate (CO3−2) [24]. Salinity stress negatively influences seed germination, growth, physiology, productivity, and reproduction and sometimes even results in death under severe conditions [25]. At the onset of salinity stress, the capacity for water absorption by roots decreases and the transpiration rate increases due to osmotic imbalance, thereby generating hyperosmotic stress [26,27]. Osmotic stress, in turn, induces closure of stomata, which restricts CO2 uptake, resulting in reduced carbon fixation and assimilation in leaf tissues [28,29]. Rates of photosynthesis and carbohydrate production are therefore reduced, which impacts plant growth and yield. Other consequences of stomatal closure include reduced evapotranspiration of water and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [30]. Salinity stress-induced ROS accumulation can lead to uncontrolled oxidation of membranes, proteins, and DNA, ultimately resulting in cell death [31]. In order to maintain ROS homeostasis [32], plants are equipped with a powerful and multifaceted antioxidant system, consisting of enzymatic and nonenzymatic components. While enzymatic components include superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), glutathione transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase-like (GPXLs), and thioredoxin peroxidase (TPOX), non-enzymatic antioxidants consist of ascorbic acid (AsA), glutathione (GSH), α-tocopherol (TOC), flavonoids, and carotenoids [33,34]. Successful detoxification of the stress-induced ROS is one of the crucial factors in salinity stress adaptation, and ethylene seems to play a pivotal role in ROS detoxification, thereby providing adaptation to salinity stress [35,36].

2. Ethylene Signal Transduction Pathway

Research in the past two decades has led to molecular dissection of the ethylene signaling network in plants [37,38,39]. In Arabidopsis, several mutants have been characterized based on the triple response of ethylene in etiolated seedlings and extensive biochemical and genetic analyses of these mutants provided the blueprint for the ethylene signal transduction pathway [40]. Ethylene is perceived by ethylene receptors, predominantly localized at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, followed by transduction of signaling cascades to the nucleus to alter the expression of ethylene-responsive genes. In Arabidopsis, five ethylene receptors have been identified to date; including Ethylene Response1 (ETR1), ETR2, Ethylene Response Sensor1 (ERS1), ERS2, and Ethylene Insensitive4 (EIN4), which are the negative regulators of the ethylene signaling. All of the identified ethylene receptors share some common features such as the presence of three domains including an ethylene binding domain, a GAF (cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases, adenyl cyclases FhlA), and a kinase domain. Besides, some receptors also contain an additional receiver domain at their C-terminus [41]. In tomato, as many as seven ethylene receptors have been isolated to date, including LeETR1, LeETR2, NR, LeETR4, LeETR5, LeETR6 [42], and a more recently discovered SlETR7 [43]. In addition to these endoplasmic reticulum membrane-localized receptors, plasma membrane-localized ethylene receptors have also been reported. For instance, OsERS1 from rice and NTHK1 from tobacco are associated with the plasma membrane, suggesting that ethylene can be perceived at multiple locations in the cells [44].
Together with these receptors, other key components of the ethylene signaling cascade include Constitutive Triple Response1 (CTR1, a negative regulator), SIMKK (MAP kinase 4/5), MAP kinase 6, Ethylene-Insensitive2 (EIN2, a positive regulator), EIN3/EIN3-Like (EILs) (primary transcription factors), EIN3-binding F-box protein (EBF1/2), and many downstream ethylene-response factors (ERFs). Under normal physiological conditions, CTR1 remains activated upon interaction with ethylene receptors, which are the negative regulators of ethylene signaling. CTR1 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that phosphorylates EIN2 to keep a check on the ethylene signal transduction during normal physiological conditions. Phosphorylated EIN2 is targeted by F-box proteins Ethylene Insensitive2 Targeting Protein1 (ETP1) and ETP2 for 26S proteasomal degradation [45]. Similarly, in the absence of ethylene, EIN3 is ubiquitinylated by F-box proteins Ethylene Insensitive3 Binding F-Box1 (EBF1) and EBF2 which is then targeted to ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Owing to the degradation of both EIN2 and EIN3, ethylene signaling is inhibited during normal growth conditions. Under stress conditions, ethylene binds to its receptors with the help of copper ions, contributed by a copper ion transporter Responsive to Antagonist1 (RAN1). Binding of ethylene to its receptors inactivates CTR1, which results in the dephosphorylation of EIN2. EIN2, in turn, activates EIN3/EILs, leading to exhaustive ethylene responses [40,45]. Some of the recent investigations reported that EIN2 is associated with EIN3 Binding F-BOX1/2 (EBF1/2) mRNA [46] and is also regulated by EIN2 Targeting Protein1/2 (ETP1/ETP2)-mediated protein turnover [45]. Meanwhile, EBF1/2 mRNA targets multiple processing body (P-body) factors that stabilize EIN3/EIL1 and activates downstream events of ethylene signaling [46]. P-bodies are cytoplasmic protein complexes involved in degradation and translational arrest of mRNA.

3. Ethylene is a Key Modulator of Salinity Stress Responses in Plants

Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling are implicated in salinity stress tolerance in plants (Table S1). Overproduction of endogenous ethylene or exogenous treatment of ethylene-releasing compounds such as ethephon or ethylene precursors such as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) increase salinity stress tolerance in various plants including Arabidopsis [47] and maize [12]. Moreover, ethylene has also been found as an essential positive mediator of salinity stress tolerance in grapevine [13], maize [12], and tomato [48]. Promising evidence of the involvement of melatonin in enhancing salinity stress tolerance by promoting MYB108A-mediated ethylene biosynthesis was also reported in grapevines [13]. It has been reported that inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis and/or signaling leads to increased sensitivity of plants to salinity stress. Gharbi et al. [48] hypothesize that ethylene exhibits a positive effect in adaptation to salinity stress probably by maintaining stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and osmotic adjustment in Solanum chilense [48]. Calcium carbide (CaC2), a precursor of acetylene exhibiting similar effects to ethylene, is commonly used to improve seed germination rates and ethylene concentration in germinating seeds under salinity stress. It is proposed that CaC2 is involved in osmotic adjustments and management of oxidative stress by increasing solute concentrations and activities of antioxidant enzymes in germinating seeds. CaC2 considerably enhances the activity of SOD and CAT besides reducing the H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations for improving seed germination in Cucumis sativus under salinity stress conditions [49]. These reports collectively suggest a positive regulatory role of ethylene in salt stress tolerance in plants; however, negative regulation of ethylene in salinity stress response has also been reported in many plants, including rice. Transgenic plants with reduced ethylene biosynthesis showed elevated salinity tolerance in tobacco [50]. Similarly, exogenous treatment with ethylene in rice resulted in salinity hypersensitivity [51,52]. Elevation of ethylene production under salinity stress significantly reduced growth, grain filling, and development of spikelets in rice [53]. Exogenous application of 1-MCP, an ethylene action inhibitor, to the rice spikelets resulted in improved physiological, agronomical, and biochemical characteristics under salinity stress, further suggesting a negative role of ethylene in salinity stress tolerance in rice [54].
Gene mutation and transgenic analyses have shown that almost all the components of ethylene biosynthesis and signal transduction pathway respond to salinity stress either positively or negatively. In cotton, short- and long-term salinity stress resulted in upregulation of different sets of genes of ethylene signaling involved in the regulation of salinity stress [55]. These genes include (a) ethylene biosynthesis genes (homologs of ACS1, ACS12, ACO1, and ACO3), (b) ethylene receptor genes (ETR1, ETR2, and EIN4), (c) ethylene signaling pathway (ERF1, ERF2, EIN3, and MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4/6 kinases), and (d) feedback mechanism gene (CTR1) [55].

3.1. Salinity Stress and Ethylene Receptors

Ethylene receptors are negative regulators of ethylene signaling, and interestingly, an inhibition of ethylene receptors has been observed during salinity stress in several plant species. In Arabidopsis, salinity stress has been shown to suppress ETR1 expression [56]. In addition, etr loss-of-function mutants showed enhanced tolerance while etr-1 gain-of-function mutants showed increased sensitivity to salinity stress in Arabidopsis [55,57,58]. Wilson et al. [59] reported that ETR1 and ETR2 function differently in Arabidopsis during seed germination under salinity stress. Loss-of-function mutants of etr1 germinated earlier than the wild type (WT), while that of etr2 germinated after WT [59]. Moreover, it has also been shown that ETR1 and ETR2 regulate abscisic acid (ABA) signaling independently of ethylene signaling and lead to contrasting germination during salinity stress [59]. In tobacco, salinity stress increases NTHK1 mRNA levels dramatically [57], suggesting a negative regulation of ethylene in salinity stress tolerance. However, overexpression of NTHK1 in tobacco resulted in early inductions of the ACC oxidase (NtACO3) and ERF (NtERF1 and NtERF4) genes during salinity stress [60]. In contrast, the expression level of a salinity-inducible ACC synthase gene (NtACS1) was greatly suppressed in the overexpression lines. Further overexpression of NTHK1 in Arabidopsis resulted in enhanced sensitivity to salinity stress but reduced sensitivity to ethylene [60,61]. Recently, it was reported that NTHK1 interacts with an ankyrin domain-containing protein NEIP2 (NTHK1 ethylene receptor-interacting protein 2) to improve the salinity and oxidative stress tolerance in tobacco [62]. Overexpression of NTHK1 resulted in the accumulation of NEIP2 in the presence of both ethylene and salinity stress. On the other hand, overexpression of NEIP2 inhibited ethylene responses, similar to the functions of NTHK1 [62]. All of these results suggest a negative regulation of ethylene receptors in salinity stress tolerance, indicating ethylene as a positive mediator of salinity stress tolerance in plants.
In addition to the ethylene receptors, CTR1 is regulated by salinity stress. It has been reported that ctr1 loss-of-function mutants showed enhanced tolerance to salinity stress, possibly by modulation of shoot Na+/K+ ratio, which is dependent on ETR1-CTR1-regulated signaling [55,63]. Moreover, high survival rates of CTR1 mutant ctr1-1 was observed under salinity and osmotic stress conditions in comparison to loss-of-function mutants ein2 and ein3-1 eil1-1 (double mutations of EIN3 and EIN3-Like1 (EIL1)) which showed remarkably reduced tolerance to salinity [58,64,65]. Ge et al. [66] showed that the heterotrimeric G-protein Gα subunit GPA1 is involved in ethylene-induced stomatal closure via NADPH oxidase-dependent H2O2 synthesis. Interestingly, GPA1 also functions downstream of RAN1, ETR1, ERS1, EIN4, and CTR1 and upstream of EIN2, EIN3, and ARR2. In guard cells of Arabidopsis leaves, ETR1 and ERS1 mediate both ethylene and H2O2 signaling, highlighting ethylene-mediated regulation of H2O2 concentrations during salinity stress [66].

3.2. Salinity Stress and EIN Proteins

EIN proteins are the transcription factors that function downstream of CTR1 in the ethylene signaling cascade. It has been observed that salinity stress-induced stabilization of EIN3/EIL1 promotes tolerance to salinity stress by averting ROS accumulation [55]. In Arabidopsis, loss-of-function of ein2 resulted in enhanced sensitivity to salinity stress while its overexpression lines showed reduced sensitivity [55,65]. Lei et al. [65] identified a MA3 domain-containing protein EIN2 C-Terminus Interacting Protein 1 (ECIP1), which interacts with EIN2. ecip1 loss-of-function mutants confer sensitivity to salinity stress during seed germination in Arabidopsis. However, these mutants show insignificant changes in ethylene responses and salinity stress tolerance. In Arabidopsis, several studies based on gene mutations showed that the ethylene signal from EIN2 to the nucleus is transduced by EIN3/EILs. Overexpression of EIN3 remarkably enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Interestingly, both loss-of-function mutants ein3-1 and double mutant ein3eil1 showed severe sensitivity to salinity stress [55,64,65]. Mao huzi (MHZ7) and MHZ6 of rice are homologs of Arabidopsis EIN2 and EIN3 [40]. OsEIL2, OsEIN2 (MHZ7), and OsEIL1 (MHZ6) were found to play a negative role in salinity stress tolerance in rice, unlike EIN2 and EIN3, which play positive roles in Arabidopsis [52]. Knockout mutants of OsEIL2, MHZ7/OsEIN2, or MHZ6/OsEIL1 enhanced salinity stress tolerance, while their overexpression mutants exhibited increased sensitivity to salinity stress in rice [52]. Downstream of EIN3/EIL1 is ESE1, which is positively regulated by ethylene signaling. ESE1 enhances plant tolerance to salinity stress by binding to promoters of salinity stress-responsive genes such as RD29A and COR15A [67]. Quan et al. [68] proposed that EIN3-SOS2 modulate salinity stress tolerance possibly by linking the ethylene signaling and salinity overly sensitive (SOS) pathways. However, further characterization showed that both EIN2 and EIN3 failed to change the expression of SOS genes in Arabidopsis. Interestingly, SOS2 phosphorylates EIN3 and activates salinity-inducible ESE1 [68]. In rice, OsDOF15 was identified as a gene involved in the coordination between salinity and ethylene biosynthesis in rice to inhibit primary root development by affecting cell proliferation in the root apical meristem [69]. In addition, the expression levels of OsEIL2 were found to be upregulated during salinity stress in WT plants; however, OsEIL2 overexpression plants showed growth retardation with shortened roots and shoots than control plants [70]. In addition, OsEIL2 overexpression plants showed increased ethylene sensitivity and accelerated leaf senescence [70]. Further, it has been observed that OsEIL2 negatively regulates the expression of BURP genes OsBURP14 and OsBURP16 to reduce the pectin content during salinity stress in rice [70]. In the case of mulberry, increased expression of MnEIL3 was observed during salinity stress both in the root and shoot [71]. Transgenic plants overexpressing MnEIL3 showed an upregulation of ethylene biosynthetic genes in Arabidopsis to enhance salinity tolerance. Moreover, MnEIL3 may enhance the activities of MnACO1 and MnACS1 promoters, indicating functioning of an ethylene–EIN3/EILs–1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase (ACO)/ ACC synthase (ACS) regulatory loop under salinity stress [71].
Cortical microtubule reorganization is crucial for survival under salinity stress [72,73], and ethylene has been found to modulate the same in roots cells and etiolated hypocotyls [74,75,76,77]. In Arabidopsis, microtubule-stabilizing protein Wave-Dampened2-Like5 (WDL5) takes part in ethylene signaling to inhibit etiolated hypocotyl elongation [76,78]. Dou et al. [78] found that ethylene signaling has a positive role in the regulation of microtubule reassembly and that WDL5 functions as a downstream effector of signaling involved in ethylene-mediated microtubule reassembly in salinity stress. Knockout of WDL5 partly suppressed ethylene-induced microtubule reassembly, whereas its upregulation partially protects from the salinity stress. Microtubule reassembly under salinity stress is insensitive to the effect of ACC in ein3eil1 cells; therefore, transcriptional regulation by EIN3/EIL1 is essential for ethylene signaling-mediated reassembly of microtubules in response to salinity stress [78].

3.3. Effects of Salinity Stress on ERFs and other Ethylene-Responsive Transcription Factors

Ethylene-responsive element binding factors (ERFs) are transcription factors functioning downstream of EIN3 in ethylene signaling. Cheng et al. [79] reported that overexpression of ERF1 enhances tolerance of plants to salinity, drought, and high-temperature stress conditions in an ethylene-independent manner. Moreover, enhanced expressions of three ERF genes including ESE1, ESE2, and ESE3 were observed in response to salinity stress and ethylene in Arabidopsis [67]. Recently, it was shown that ERF1/2 was upregulated whereas CTR1 and EIN3-binding F-box protein 1/2 (EBF1/2) were downregulated during salinity stress in Cynanchum auriculatum [14]. Li et al. [80] cloned an APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) gene from salinity-tolerant sweet potato line ND98 and named it IbRAP2-12. Based on the transient expression in tobacco epidermal cells and transcriptional activation analysis, the protein of IbRAP2-12 was found to be localized in nucleus and it was observed that IbRAP2-12 exhibits transcriptional activation because of a domain located at the C-terminus of the protein. As compared to the WT, IbRAP2-12-overexpression lines showed higher accumulation of proline and lower concentration of H2O2 under salinity stress in Arabidopsis. Moreover, multiple genes involved in the ROS-detoxification including SAPX, GPX7, and CAT5 were found to be upregulated in the transgenic plants under salinity stress [80].
Similarly, overexpression of an ethylene-responsive transcription factor (TdSHN1) from durum wheat resulted in the development of a cuticle and lower stomatal density than WT. TdSHN1 overexpression lines, therefore, showed enhanced tolerance to salinity stress because of a reduced water loss from the leaf lamina [81]. On exposure to salinity stress, MdERF4 from apple is induced to decrease the salinity stress tolerance by binding and inhibiting the expression of MdERF3, suggesting that the MdERF4–MdERF3 interaction may be a feedback regulation mechanism in salinity stress to maintain ethylene homeostasis in plants [82]. Similarly, the expression of the ERF38 gene from poplar 84K (Populus alba × Populus glandulosa) was induced under salinity stress. Overexpression of ERF38 in poplar reduced membrane lipid peroxidation, decreased ROS accumulation, accumulated proline and soluble proteins, and exhibited higher POD and SOD activities in transgenic plants than WT, suggesting a multifaceted role of ERF38 in improving salinity and osmotic stress tolerance in poplar [83]. Acireductone dioxygenase (ARD) is an active metal-binding metalloenzyme and is involved in the formation of 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyrate (KMTB) to further produce methionine (Met) on the methionine salvage pathway, which is an initial substrate in ethylene synthesis pathway [84,85,86]. Overexpression of OsARD1 increases the water-holding capacity and relative water content in the leaves of OsARD1 overexpression lines to reduce the sensitivity to salinity and osmotic stresses at germination stage [87]. It was speculated that the drop in sensitivity to salinity and osmotic stresses results in an increased ethylene concentration in OsARD1 overexpression plants [87].

4. Seed Germination Regulated by Ethylene under Salinity Stress

Successful seed germination is the most crucial phase in the initiation of the life cycle of plants and is regulated by many external and internal factors including phytohormones, light, temperature, drought, and salinity [88,89,90,91]. Seed germination is severely affected in saline soil, which negatively influences plant growth and crop yield [10] (Figure 1). Different components of ethylene signaling participate either positively or negatively during seed germination and seedling growth under salinity stress [92]. For example, seed germination in Arabidopsis was inhibited by ETR1 and EIN4, whereas ETR2 was found to be a positive regulator involved in stimulating seed germination during salinity stress conditions [59].
Ethylene antagonistically modulates seed germination in Arabidopsis under salinity stress via the Constitutive Photomorphogenesis1 (COP1)-mediated downregulation of Elongated Hypocotyl5 (HY5) and ABA Insensitive5 (ABI5) in the nucleus [93] (Figure 1). Salinity stress inhibits seed germination through elevation of the H2O2 and exogenous treatment of ethylene precursor (ACC) has been shown to regulate the ROS homeostasis to induce the seed germination [94]. Interaction between ethylene and nitric oxide has also been shown to regulate seed germination by decreasing the H2O2 level induced by salinity stress, further suggesting that ethylene promotes the seed germination rate by modulation of ROS production in salinity stress. On the other hand, ethylene can also inhibit the seed germination induced by salinity stress in many plant species. For example, Chang et al. [95] reported that ethylene is involved in the suppression of seed germination in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and that l-Glu interacts with ethylene in the regulation of seed germination under salinity stress. Ethylene produced during salinity stress helps to maintain the Na+/K+ homeostasis to provide salinity stress tolerance [63].
Overexpression of the Malus hupehensis SHINE clade protein (MhSHN1) gene, a member of the AP2/ERF transcription factor, does not regulate the seed germination in transgenic tobacco plants yet it enhances salinity and osmotic stress tolerance during seed germination [96]. In Stylosanthes humilis, a forage legume naturally growing in the saline soils, ethylene production in the seeds provides tolerance to salinity stress [97,98,99]. Salinity induced production of ABA, and ethylene forms a point of union between the two and enables the regulation of energy metabolism and embryo growth in S. humilis seeds within a given pH condition [99]. Ectopic expression of a zinc finger transcription factor Gossypium hirsutum plant AT-rich sequence and zinc-binding (GhPLATZ1) in Arabidopsis regulated seed germination and seedling establishment under salinity and mannitol stress conditions. Further experimentations revealed that the inhibition of ABI4 and ETO1 expressions suppressed ACS gene expression to alter the ABA, GA, and ethylene pathways in transgenic lines [100]. Ectopic expression of a homolog of AtERF38 (GhERF38 from G. hirsutum) in Arabidopsis resulted in ABA sensitivity in transgenic lines; therefore, reduced seed germination under salinity and drought stress was observed in the transgenic plants as compared to WT [101]. Plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas fluorescens strains improve salinity tolerance of plants due to its ability to produce ACC deaminase and, consequently, to stimulate seed germination in wheat under salinity stress [102]. With the higher activity of ACC deaminase, the Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4 strain could effectively promote seed germination and could provide the salinity tolerance by degrading ACC, thus inhibiting ethylene synthesis [103]. Moreover, seeds of the transgenic line overexpressing ethylene response factors (ERF95 and ERF96) showed better germination and seedling establishment as compared to the WT during salinity stress conditions [104]. A novel ethylene-responsive transcription factor from Lycium chinense LchERF provides salinity tolerance to transgenic tobacco during seed germination and vegetative growth [105]. Notwithstanding, Chang et al. [95] reported that salinity interferes with the ethylene signaling pathway and decreases ethylene production in seeds of C. sativus, which was associated with the inhibition of germination. In Faba beans (Vicia faba), seed germination in salinity-tolerant Y134 is not inhibited during salinity stress as compared to the salinity-sensitive Y078 probably because of the downregulation of genes related to ABA and ethylene signaling pathways and upregulation of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) genes [106]. Seeds of Capsicum annuum primed with SA showed higher a germination rate due to suppression of the ethylene level as well as elevation of total soluble sugar contents and SOD activity [107].

5. Fine-Tuning of Photosynthetic Machinery by Ethylene during Salinity Stress

Homeostasis of essential elements like N, P, K, S, and Ca is altered during salinity stress, which in turn affects the photosynthetic efficiency of plants [108,109,110]. Salinity stress induces oxidative stress through increased production of ROS, which can disrupt chloroplast functions (Figure 2). Salts at higher concentrations induce both osmotic and ionic stresses, which affect photosynthetic activity either by closing the stomata or by reducing the activity of CO2-fixing enzymes and availability of water in the plant cells [111] (Figure 2). Activities of CO2-fixing enzymes are reduced at higher concentrations of Na+, and tolerance of these enzymes to Na+ concentrations varies from species to species [112]. Na+ ions imbalance the proton motive force and thus influence photosynthetic machinery and chloroplastic functions [113]. Salinity stress influences the photosynthetic parameters including chlorophyll, photosystems, net photosynthesis rate (Pn), chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, soluble sugar contents, and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) activity [114]. Recently, it was reported that tomato plants showed improved photosynthesis, metabolic homeostasis, and growth rate as a result of elevated CO2 under salinity stress by decreasing the amount of ABA hormone and ACC [115]. Among all the photosynthetic parameters, photosystem II (PSII) is the most susceptible to various abiotic stresses including salinity [116,117]. Homeostasis of Na+ ions maintain membrane integrity, relative water content, net photosynthesis, and yield. Ethylene has been shown to promote the homeostasis of Na+/K+, nutrients, and ROS to enhance plant tolerance to salinity [40]. The ctr1-1 mutants maintain relatively higher concentrations of K+ and lower concentrations of Na+ in contrast to ein2-5 or ein3 plants, where an opposite trend of K+ and Na+ concentration was observed compared with the WT undertreated and optimum conditions [63]. Because of this altered K+ and Na+ homeostasis, ctr1-1 plants displayed a slight reduction in leaf area and root elongation, while ein2-5 or ein3-1 mutants showed magnified retardation in plant growth compared to the WT under salinity stress [63]. In pomegranate, salinity decreased the net photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, relative water content, and electrical conductivity [114,118,119]. Further heat map analysis showed that antiapoptotic genes BAG6 and BAG7 were clustered together with ERS2, EIN3, and ACS and that the transcripts levels of BAG6, BAG7, ERS2, and ACS2 were significantly suppressed in the response to salinity. The inclusion of ACC or ethylene source in the saline solution restored the expression levels of BAG6 and BAG7, suggesting the involvement of ethylene in the regulation of these antiapoptotic genes under salinity stress [120].
In Arabidopsis and alfalfa, Enterobacter sp. SA187 mediates salinity tolerance by producing 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid (KMBA), which is converted into ethylene in planta [121,122]. This Enterobacter-produced KMBA is involved in the maintenance of photosynthesis and primary metabolism together with the reduction of ABA-mediated stress responses in plants. Gene expression analysis revealed that, after SA187 inoculation, genes related to photosynthesis and primary metabolism remain unaltered under salinity stress conditions as compared to the mock plants [122,123]. Similarly, in rice, inoculation of Glutamicibacter sp. YD01 facilitated rice plants to combat stress by ethylene-mediated regulation of ROS accumulation, ion homeostasis, and photosynthetic capacity and by enhancing stress-responsive gene expression [124]. Tight regulation of ROS homeostasis also accelerates photosynthesis and growth by abating lipid peroxidation in chloroplasts [125,126,127].
It is well established that salinity stress also affects nitrogen and sulfur assimilation in plants. Plants grown on low nitrate (5 mM) showed lower photosynthesis and growth compared to the plants grown in sufficient nitrate concentrations during non-saline conditions [128]. When excess nitrate (20 mM) was applied under non-saline conditions, an inhibitory effect on photosynthesis was observed, which was related to higher ethylene production. However, under salinity stress conditions, as the demand for N increased, the excess N optimized ethylene, enhanced proline production, and promoted photosynthesis and growth [128]. Recently, it was reported that cadmium and sodium stress conditions induce ethylene and Jasmonic acid (JA) signaling. Both of these signaling pathways converged at EIN3/EIL1 and resulted in an enhanced expression of a nitrate transporter NRT1.8 and reduced expression of NRT1.5. Although it resulted in decreased plant growth, it promoted plant tolerance to stress in a nitrate reductase-dependent manner by mediating the stress-initiated nitrate allocation to roots, which decoupled nitrate assimilation and photosynthesis [129]. Taken together, these studies clearly highlight that ethylene plays a major role in stabilizing photosynthesis under salinity stress conditions by maintaining the ROS accumulation, ion homeostasis, and mineral homeostasis and by elevating the antioxidant defense mechanism.

6. Modulation of Plant Cell Death under Salinity Stress

Several hormones including jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, abscisic acid, gibberellins, and ethylene regulate plant cell death (PCD). Of these, ethylene has been most actively involved in PCD and is alone sufficient to cause PCD in many plant systems [130]. PCD is a vital process during growth and development, especially in the organization and maintenance of plants, and plays a crucial role in the several defense responses against certain types of environmental stresses, both abiotic including salinity stress [131,132] and biotic ones [133,134,135,136,137]. ROS accumulation is an important inducer of PCD in plant cells under stress conditions as ROS molecules such as H2O2 and superoxide radicals (O2) can damage the cellular components [138]. Similarly, salinity stress-induced ROS also initiates PCD during salinity stress conditions [139]. In tomato suspension cells, ethylene production enhances PCD during salinity stress [140]. Ethylene also regulates the expression and activity of cysteine proteases, an important component of the NaCl-induced cell death program [141]. It has been reported that cysteine protease inhibitor E-64 decreases NaCl-induced cell death. During abiotic stress conditions and senescence [142,143], cysteine protease subfamily C1A (papain-like cysteine proteases) components cause PCD [144]. The expression of the cysteine protease gene in Petunia corollas is regulated by ethylene sensitivity. The expression of genes encoding the two cysteine protease inhibitors AtCYSa and AtCYSb improves salinity stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [145]. Cell death signaling can be mediated by the activation of MAPKs (Mitogen-activated protein kinase) and cysteine proteases, and ethylene can speed-up the process only in cells exposed to high salinity [140,146]. Moreover, decreased concentrations of K+ and the ratio of K+/Na+ have been reported to be involved in the cell death caused by high salinity [147]. Silver thiosulfate, an ethylene receptor blocker, significantly reduces the NaCl-induced cell death, confirming the role of ethylene in direct control of PCD [140].
Ethylene responsive transcription factor ERF109 gene retards PCD and improves salinity tolerance in the WT tobacco plant [148]. The role of ERFs in the adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses is well established [149,150]. It was observed that the ERF109 gene has a positive role in salinity-induced lateral root development [148]. Moreover, it was also reported that ethylene can control the salinity-induced PCD and can enhance salinity stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by maintaining ROS homeostasis [120].
Bcl-2-associated athanogene (BAG) family genes are also associated with PCD during growth, development, and stress responses. In Arabidopsis, ethylene stimulates the expression of senescence-associated genes (ANACO29, ANACO92, RPK, SAG, ATG GBF, and GDH) [151] and ethylene-related genes (ERS2, ERF1, ACS2, ETR2, and EIN3) [152]. After comparison of BAG gene expression levels with ethylene-related and senescence-associated genes in the WT under salinity stress as well as after adding ACC, it was observed that salinity alone was able to significantly suppress the transcript levels of BAG6 and BAG7. However, exogenous application of ACC in the saline solution restored the expression levels of BAG6 and BAG7 and inhibited salinity-induced PCD. Ethylene and salinity antagonistically regulate BAG family-, ethylene-, and senescence-related genes to mediate salinity-induced PCD and to confer salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis [120].

7. Cross-Talk between Ethylene and Various Plant Hormones during Salinity Stress

Phytohormones like auxin (IAA), cytokinin (CK), and abscisic acid (ABA) interact with ethylene to play a decisive role in adaptation to the salinity stress [153] (Figure 3). In response to environmental fluctuations, calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPK) and MAPKs signaling cascades are stimulated in parallel and their partial overlap helps in exhibiting stimulus-specific response. It is ethylene which is responsible for mediating cross-talk between these two pathways and for exhibiting the desired response [154]. Furthermore, there exists an antagonistic interaction between ethylene and gibberellins, which helps in adjusting salinity tolerance either by regulating or initiating the defense system [155] (Figure 3).

7.1. Auxin and Ethylene

There exists a cross-talk between phytohormones to overcome the adverse environmental conditions faced by a plant (Figure 3). The cross-talk between IAA and ethylene results in stimulation of the antioxidation mechanism. It was observed that diageotropica (dgt), a tomato mutant plant with reduced IAA sensitivity, was able to avoid cadmium stress due to a disruption in IAA-triggered ethylene biosynthesis [156]. Moreover, IAA-stimulated ethylene production controls ABA; therefore, plants grew better even under abiotic stress [157].

7.2. Cytokinin and Ethylene

CK is the hormone associated with growth and development. It promotes cell division, shoot differentiation, leaf senescence, and other developmental processes. After its synthesis in the root tips, it is transported to the shoots. It was reported that synthesis and transportation of CK are reduced in response to salinity stress, leading to lower salinity tolerance [158]. In the same study, antagonistic interaction between ABA and CK was also revealed during salinity stress, which hinders the tolerance. External application of CK to the salinity-stressed plants resulted in downregulation of the genes involved in ABA-mediated stress response [159]. Similarly, lower expressions of mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 9 (MKK9), ACC synthase 6 (ACS6), and ERF1 and ERF5 were observed after external application of CK, which were upregulated before CK application under salinity stress, further suggesting the antagonistic interaction of CK with ABA and ethylene (Figure 3).

7.3. Gibberellins (GA) and Ethyslene

Under stress conditions, GA interacts with ethylene via aspartate-glutamate-leucine-leucine-alanine (DELLA) proteins [160]. Ethylene increases the accumulation of DELLA proteins, which in turn reduce the action of gibberellins (Figure 3). Plants with enhanced accumulation of DELLA proteins showed better tolerance to salinity stress as compared to the plants where the accumulation of DELLA proteins was not observed [64]. Moreover, GA, in order to tolerate salinity stress, may act downstream of ethylene signaling. The interaction of GA with ethylene was observed via DELLA proteins only. Moreover, the mutants in which the DELLA protein gene was disrupted by four folds showed improved root growth in high salinity stress, as ethylene suppresses the root growth and GA promotes the same [161].

7.4. Abscisic Acid and Ethylene

ABA, well-known for its involvement in stomata closure, also plays crucial roles during salinity stress tolerance. An increase in ABA concentration was observed in the leaves of tomato plant as a response to salinity. Salinity stress leads to water scarcity in plants due to low soil water content and high vapor pressure due to climatic conditions. This water deficiency stimulates the closure of stomata via ABA to prevent water loss by transpiration [162]. ABA and salinity are known to regulate a number of genes associated with ethylene biosynthesis and signaling including AtACS5, AtACS7, TaACO1, and GhERF1, among others [40]. EIN2 is the key regulator and mediator between ethylene and other phytohormones, such as ABA, and alteration in the EIN2 during salinity stress results in an increased amount of ABA production [163]. Mutations in ACS7 lead to an upregulation of stress-responsive genes involved in ABA signaling, thereby enhancing the plant’s tolerance to salinity stress [164]. Moreover, reduced ethylene concentration and leaf abscission were observed in citrus plants subjected to external application of ABA under salinity stress [165].

7.5. Jasmonic Acid, Brassinosteroids, and Ethylene

Jasmonic acid (JA), a lipid-derived plant hormone, plays essential roles in plant growth and withstanding harsh environmental conditions [166]. JA acts as a positive controller of salinity stress tolerance in plants [167]. A study aimed to analyze the effect of vermicompost leachate (VCL) in salinity-stressed tomato seedlings showed that, though the concentration of JA in VCL was extremely low, its endogenous concentration in roots and leaves was significantly higher. This can only be attributed to VLC-stimulated JA synthesis [168]. Exogenous application of JA helps in inducing salinity tolerance in soybean [169], tomato [170], and rice [171]. JA is also known to improve photosynthetic activity [158] and to reduce Na+ concentration under salinity stress. Ethylene and JA may either work together or antagonistically in response to stress conditions. The cross-talk between JA and ethylene is mediated via EIN3/EIL1 along with JAZs-MYC2 [172]. JA and ethylene act synergistically and repress leaf growth and expansion by targeting AUXs which are responsible for growth and suppressor of JA synthesis. Gene expression is affected via JA2 repressor and EIN3/EILI transcription factor as ethylene promotes the stability of EIN3/EILI [154]. In addition, a synergistic action of these two phytohormones was observed during stress conditions through the activation of ERF1. In addition, it has also been shown that EIN3-deficient mutant showed an enhanced concentration of JA, further suggesting a cross-talk between these two hormones via EIN3 [173].
Brassinosteroids (BRs) and ethylene interact with each other by initiating an alternative respiratory pathway (Figure 3). Exogenous application of BRs to cucumber seedlings showed increased levels of ethylene and alternative oxidase pathway (AOX) components. BRs also help in avoiding oxidative damage done by ROS as it initiates the production of ethylene and ROS, which in turn activates AOX, leading to the detoxification of excess ROS produced [174]. BR and ethylene act synergistically in overcoming the adverse effects of salinity during seed germination. Salinity stress hinders proper seed germination by affecting ACO synthesis [175]. A study on tomato plants highlighted a relation among H2O2, ethylene, and BR [176]. Ethylene was involved in the BR-induced salinity tolerance, and H2O2 was responsible for enhanced BR-induced ethylene accumulation. Moreover, inhibition of H2O2 synthesis also reduced BR-induced ethylene accumulation during salinity stress. Similarly, when ethylene was inhibited, H2O2 generation was partially blocked. Taken together, these results highlight a vital role of ethylene and H2O2 in BR-induced salinity stress tolerance.

8. Conclusions

This review summarizes recent advancements highlighting the involvement of ethylene in salinity stress tolerance in plants (Table S1). Research carried out to date on ethylene and salinity stress confirms that in planta ethylene levels may positively or negatively affect plants’ responses to salinity stress, suggesting that the fine-tuning of ethylene action may be necessary for salinity stress tolerance in plants. Ethylene also interacts with other phytohormones to bring about the desired response, either by regulating the gene expression or by regulating transcription factors. Although a growing body of evidences suggests a cross-talk of ethylene with other phytohormones during salinity stress, a detailed mechanism is still elusive and needs to be investigated. Based on the current understanding of the roles of ethylene under salinity stress, a putative model is proposed (Figure 4). Future efforts could be on the further dissection of ethylene-induced signaling during salinity stress through a multi-omics approach. Moreover, efforts should also be made in the future to investigate the roles of posttranslational modifications in the regulation of ethylene signaling under salinity stress conditions. The quest for the biological role of ethylene under salinity stress must lure plant biologists to pursue the investigation with solid experimental evidence.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/6/959/s1, Table S1: An overview of the recent studies on the role of ethylene in salt-treated plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R., K.K.B., and R.G.; writing—original draft: R.R., R.V., K.S., N.N., M.K., K.K.B., and R.G.; funding acquisition: R.R, S.T.K., and R.G.; supervision: S.T.K. and R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2018R1A4A1025158) provided to S.T.K., R.R. was supported by Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship 2015 (SH2015_500067) and Bilateral State Scholarship 2019/2020 (AK-00210-002/2019), Tempus Public Foundation. R.G. was supported by the Ramalingaswami-re-entry fellowship (BT/HRD/35/02/2006) from the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neljubow, D. Uber die horizontale Nutation der Stengel von Pisum Sativum und einiger anderen Planzen. Bot. Cent. Beih. 1901, 10, 128–139. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hua, J. Isolation of Components Involved in Ethylene Signaling. In Ethylene in Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 27–44. ISBN 9401794839. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abeles, F.B.; Morgan, P.W.; Salinityveit, M.E., Jr. Ethylene in Plant Biology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; ISBN 0080916287. [Google Scholar]
  4. Burg, S.P.; Burg, E.A. Molecular requirements for the biological activity of ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1967, 42, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Guzman, P.; Ecker, J.R. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 513–523. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Tadeo, F.R.; Primo-Millo, E.; Talón, M. Involvement of abscisic acid and ethylene in the responses of citrus seedlings to salinity shock. Physiol. Plant. 1998, 103, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arraes, F.B.M.; Beneventi, M.A.; de Sa, M.E.L.; Paixao, J.F.R.; Albuquerque, E.V.S.; Marin, S.R.R.; Purgatto, E.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.F. Implications of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in soybean drought stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kim, S.W.; Yoo, J.S.; Moon, A.R.; Shin, A.Y.; Kwon, S.Y.; Kim, S.T. A TMT-Based Quantitative Proteome Analysis to Elucidate the TSWV Induced Signaling Cascade in Susceptible and Resistant Cultivars of Solanum lycopersicum. Plants 2020, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S.T. Identification of Msp1-Induced Signaling Components in Rice Leaves by Integrated Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  11. Siddikee, M.A.; Chauhan, P.S.; Sa, T. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis under salinity stress in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 31, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Freitas, V.S.; de Souza Miranda, R.; Costa, J.H.; de Oliveira, D.F.; de Oliveira Paula, S.; de Castro Miguel, E.; Freire, R.S.; Prisco, J.T.; Gomes-Filho, E. Ethylene triggers salinity tolerance in maize genotypes by modulating polyamine catabolism enzymes associated with H2O2 production. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 145, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, L.; Xiang, G.; Sun, Q.; Ni, Y.; Jin, Z.; Gao, Z.; Yao, Y. Melatonin enhances salinity tolerance by promoting MYB108A-mediated ethylene biosynthesis in grapevines. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Zhang, M.; Hong, L.Z.; Gu, M.F.; Wu, C.D.; Zhang, G. Transcriptome analyses revealed molecular responses of Cynanchum auriculatum leaves to saline stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  15. Kim, S.W.; Min, C.W.; Gupta, R.; Jo, I.H.; Bang, K.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, S.T. Proteomics analysis of early salinity-responsive proteins in ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) leaves. Korean J. Med. Crop. Sci. 2014, 22, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bray, E.A.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Weretilnyk, E. Responses to abiotic stress. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants; Buchanan, B., Gruissem, W., Jones, R., Eds.; American Society of Plant Physiology: Rockville, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 1158–1203. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pitman, M.G.; Läuchli, A. Global Impact of Salinity and Agricultural Ecosystems. In Salinity: Environment-Plants-Molecules; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  18. Polle, A.; Chen, S. On the salinityy side of life: Molecular, physiological and anatomical adaptation and acclimation of trees to extreme habitats. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 1794–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ghatak, A.; Chaturvedi, P.; Paul, P.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kim, S.T.; Weckwerth, W.; Gupta, R. Proteomics survey of Solanaceae family: Current status and challenges ahead. J. Proteom. 2017, 169, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salinity stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  21. Qadir, M.; Quillérou, E.; Nangia, V.; Murtaza, G.; Singh, M.; Thomas, R.J.; Drechsel, P.; Noble, A.D. Economics of salinity-induced land degradation and restoration. Nat. Resour. Forum 2014, 38, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Neumann, P.M. Inhibition of root growth by salinity stress: Toxicity or an adaptive biophysical response? In Structure and Function of Roots; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rasool, S.; Hameed, A.; Azooz, M.M.; Siddiqi, T.O.; Ahmad, P. Salinity stress: Causes, types and responses of plants. In Ecophysiology and Responses of Plants under Salinity Stress; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  24. Muhammad, N.; Samina, B.; Yasmin, K.; Roqayya, M.; Zabta, K.S.; Abdul, L.K.; Ajmal, K.; Ahmed, A. Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salinity tolerance in plants: A review. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 209, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mahajan, S.; Tuteja, N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 444, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Munns, R. Genes and salinity tolerance: Bringing them together. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 645–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Y.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salinity-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  28. Fricke, W. Rapid and tissue-specific accumulation of solutes in the growth zone of barley leaves in response to salinity. Planta 2004, 219, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. James, R.A.; von Caemmerer, S.; Condon, A.T.; Zwart, A.B.; Munns, R. Genetic variation in tolerance to the osmotic stress component of salinity stress in durum wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Møller, I.M.; Jensen, P.E.; Hansson, A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 459–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Fichman, Y.; Miller, G.; Mittler, R. Whole-plant live imaging of reactive oxygen species. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Mittler, R. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B. Salinity tolerance and salinity effect on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe 2005, 60, 324–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Younis, M.E.; Hasaneen, M.N.A.; Kazamel, A.M.S. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid ameliorates detrimental effects of NaCl and mannitol stress in Vicia faba seedlings. Protoplasma 2010, 239, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Choi, Y.W.; Jun, T.H.; Kwon, S.W.; Choi, I.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Gupta, R.; Kim, S.T. Expression Analysis of Oryza sativa Ascorbate Peroxidase 1 (OsAPx1) in Response to Different Phytohormones and Pathogens. J. Life Sci. 2015, 25, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Kim, S.G.; Tsuda, K.; Gupta, R.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, S.T.; Kang, K.Y. Magnaporthe oryzae-secreted protein MSP1 induces cell death and elicits defense responses in rice. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Meng, Q.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kim, S.T. Comparative phosphoproteome analysis upon ethylene and abscisic acid treatment in Glycine max leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Meng, Q.; Jun, T.H.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kim, S.T. Phosphoproteome data from abscisic acid and ethylene treated Glycine max leaves. Data Brief 2018, 20, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kramer, K.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Park, K.H.; Wang, Y.; Finkemeier, I.; Kim, S.T. A Multi-Omics Analysis of Glycine max Leaves Reveals Alteration in Flavonoid and Isoflavonoid Metabolism Upon Ethylene and Abscisic Acid Treatment. J. Proteom. 2018, 18, 1700366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tao, J.J.; Chen, H.W.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wilson, R.L.; Lacey, R.F.; Binder, B.M. Ethylene Receptors-Biochemical Events. In Ethylene in Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 45–59. [Google Scholar]
  42. Klee, H.J. Control of ethylene-mediated processes in tomato at the level of receptors. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 2057–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Chen, Y.; Hu, G.; Rodriguez, C.; Liu, M.; Binder, B.M.; Chervin, C. Roles of SlETR7, a newly discovered ethylene receptor, in tomato plant and fruit development. J. Hort. Res. 2020, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  44. Yu, M.; Yau, C.P.; Yip, W.K. Differentially localized rice ethylene receptors OsERS1 and OsETR2 and their potential role during submergence. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, e1356532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. Qiao, H.; Chang, K.N.; Yazaki, J.; Ecker, J.R. Interplay between ethylene, ETP1/ETP2 F-box proteins, and degradation of EIN2 triggers ethylene responses in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  46. Li, W.; Ma, M.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, M.; An, F.; Guo, H. EIN2-directed translational regulation of ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell 2015, 163, 670–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  47. Yang, L.; Zu, Y.G.; Tang, Z.H. Ethylene improves Arabidopsis salinity tolerance mainly via retaining K+ in shoots and roots rather than decreasing tissue Na+ content. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 86, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gharbi, E.; Martínez, J.P.; Benahmed, H.; Lepoint, G.; Vanpee, B.; Quinet, M.; Lutts, S. Inhibition of ethylene synthesis reduces salinity-tolerance in tomato wild relative species Solanum chilense. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 210, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shakar, M.; Yaseen, M.; Mahmood, R.; Ahmad, I. Calcium carbide induced ethylene modulate biochemical profile of Cucumis sativus at seed germination stage to alleviate salinity stress. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 213, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tavladoraki, P.; Cona, A.; Federico, R.; Tempera, G.; Viceconte, N.; Saccoccio, S.; Battaglia, V.; Toninello, A.; Agostinelli, E. Polyamine catabolism: Target for antiproliferative therapies in animals and stress tolerance strategies in plants. Amino Acids 2012, 42, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Müller, M.; Munnébosch, S. Ethylene response factors. A key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  52. Yang, C.; Ma, B.; He, S.J.; Xiong, Q.; Duan, K.X.; Yin, C.C.; Chen, H.; Lu, X.; Chen, S.H.; Zhang, J.H. MAOHUZI6/ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE2 regulate ethylene response of roots and coleoptiles and negatively affect salinity tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  53. Sajid, H.; Chu, Z.; Zhigang, B.; Xiaochuang, C.; Lianfeng, Z.; Azhar, H.; Zhu, C.; Fahad, S.; James, A.B.; Zhang, J.; et al. Effects of 1-Methylcyclopropene on rice growth characteristics and superior and inferior spikelet development under salinity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1368–1384. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hussain, S.; Bai, Z.; Huang, J.; Cao, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, J. 1-Methylcyclopropene Modulates Physiological, Biochemical, and Antioxidant Responses of Rice to Different Salinity Stress Levels. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 124. [Google Scholar]
  55. Peng, Z.; He, S.; Gong, W.; Sun, J.; Pan, Z.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.; Du, X. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes and transcriptional regulation induced by salt stress in two contrasting cotton genotypes. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  56. Zhao, X.C.; Schaller, G.E. Effect of salinity and osmotic stress upon expression of the ethylene receptor ETR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2004, 562, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. Zhou, H.L.; Cao, W.H.; Cao, Y.R.; Liu, J.; Hao, Y.J.; Zhang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Roles of ethylene receptor NTHK1 domains in plant growth, stress response and protein phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  58. Cao, W.H.; Liu, J.; He, X.J.; Mu, R.L.; Zhou, H.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salinity-stress responses. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  59. Wilson, R.L.; Kim, H.; Bakshi, A.; Binder, B.M. The ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 and ETHYLENE RESPONSE2 have contrasting roles in seed germination of Arabidopsis during salinity stress. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  60. Cao, W.H.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Cao, Y.R.; Zheng, S.F.; Du, B.X.; Zang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Expression of tobacco ethylene receptor NTHK1 alters plant responses to salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1210–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, T.; Liu, J.; Lei, G.; Liu, Y.F.; Li, Z.G.; Tao, J.J.; Hao, Y.J.; Cao, Y.R.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, W.K.; et al. Effects of tobacco Ethylene receptor mutations on receptor kinase activity, plant growth and stress responses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1636–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Cao, Y.R.; Chen, H.W.; Li, Z.G.; Tao, J.J.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Tobacco ankyrin protein NEIP2 interacts with ethylene receptor NTHK1 and regulates plant growth and stress responses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 803–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  63. Jiang, C.; Belfield, E.J.; Cao, Y.; Smith, J.A.; Harberd, N.P. An Arabidopsis soil-salinity-tolerance mutation confers ethylene-mediated enhancement of sodium/potassium homeostasis. Plant Cell. 2013, 25, 3535–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  64. Achard, P.; Cheng, H.; De Grauwe, L.; Decat, J.; Schoutteten, H.; Moritz, T.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Peng, J.; Harberd, N.P. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science 2006, 311, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lei, G.; Shen, M.; Li, Z.G.; Zhang, B.; Duan, K.X.; Wang, N.; Cao, Y.R.; Zhang, W.K.; Ma, B.; Ling, H.Q.; et al. EIN2 regulates salinity stress response and interacts with a MA3 domain-containing protein ECIP1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1678–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ge, X.M.; Cai, H.L.; Lei, X.; Zhou, X.; Yue, M.; He, J.M. Heterotrimeric G protein mediates ethylene-induced stomatal closure via hydrogen peroxide synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 82, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, L.X.; Li, Z.F.; Quan, R.D.; Li, G.J.; Wang, R.G.; Huang, R.F. An AP2 domain-containing gene, ESE1, targeted by the ethylene signaling component EIN3 is important for the salinity response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  68. Quan, R.; Wang, J.; Yang, D.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, R. EIN3 and SOS2 synergistically modulate plant salinity tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44637–44647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  69. Qin, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, F.; Peng, P.; Zhou, Y.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Qi, Y.; et al. Rice Os DOF 15 contributes to ethylene-inhibited primary root elongation under salinity stress. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 798–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jin, J.; Duan, J.; Shan, C.; Mei, Z.; Chen, H.; Feng, H.; Zhu, J.; Cai, W. Ethylene insensitive3-like2 (OsEIL2) confers stress sensitivity by regulating OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase (PG1β-like) subfamily gene in rice. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, C.; Li, J.; Zhu, P.; Yu, J.; Hou, J.; Wang, C.; Long, D.; Yu, M.; Zhao, A. Mulberry EIL3 confers salinity and drought tolerances and modulates ethylene biosynthetic gene expression. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Yuan, M. Salinity tolerance requires cortical microtubule reorganization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 1534–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  73. Zhang, Q.; Lin, F.; Mao, T.; Nie, J.; Yan, M.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, W. Phosphatidic acid regulates microtubule organization by interacting with MAP65-1 in response to salinity stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4555–4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  74. Le, J.; Vandenbusscheb, F.; Straetenb, D.V.D.; Verbelen, J.P. Position and cell 786 type-dependent microtubule reorientation characterizes the early response of the 787 Arabidopsis root epidermis to ethylene. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 121, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Verbelen, J.P.; Jie, L.; Vissenberg, K.; Cnodder, T.D.; Vandenbussche, F.; Sugimoto, K.; Straeten, D.V.D. Microtubules and the control of cell elongation in Arabidopsis roots. In The Plant Cytoskeleton: A Key Tool for Agro-Biotechnology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 73–90. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sun, J.; Ma, Q.; Mao, T. Ethylene regulates the Arabidopsis microtubule-associated protein WAVE-DAMPENED2-LIKE5 in etiolated hypocotyl elongation. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ma, Q.; Sun, J.; Mao, T. Microtubule bundling plays a role in ethylene-mediated cortical microtubule reorientation in etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 2043–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. Dou, L.; He, K.; Higaki, T.; Wang, X.; Mao, T. Ethylene signaling modulates cortical microtubule reassembly in response to salinity stress. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 2071–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  80. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Zhai, H.; Zhao, N.; He, S. An AP2/ERF gene, IbRAP2-12, from sweetpotato is involved in salinity and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Plant Sci. 2019, 281, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Djemal, R.; Khoudi, H. TdSHN1, a WIN1/SHN1-type transcription factor, imparts multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 131, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. An, J.P.; Zhang, X.W.; Xu, R.R.; You, C.X.; Wang, X.F.; Hao, Y.J. Apple MdERF4 negatively regulates salinity tolerance by inhibiting MdERF3 transcription. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, K.; Yao, W.; Li, R.; Zhou, B.; Jiang, T. Over-expression of ERF38 gene enhances salt and osmotic tolerance in transgenic poplar. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Yang, S.F.; Hoffman, N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1984, 35, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, K.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 131–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. Sauter, M.; Lorbiecke, R.; OuYang, B.; Pochapsky, T.C.; Rzewuski, G. The immediate-early ethylene response gene OsARD1 encodes an acireductone dioxygenase involved in recycling of the ethylene precursor S-adenosylmethionine. Plant J. 2005, 44, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liang, S.; Xiong, W.; Yin, C.; Xie, X.; Jin, Y.J.; Zhang, S.; Yang, B.; Ye, G.; Chen, S.; Luan, W.J. Overexpression of OsARD1 Improves Submergence, Drought, and Salinity Tolerances of Seedling Through the Enhancement of Ethylene Synthesis in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L.; Soppe, W.J. Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  90. Weitbrecht, K.; Müller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  91. Ghassemian, M.; Nambara, E.; Cutler, S.; Kawaide, H.; Kamiya, Y.; McCourt, P. Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  92. Cao, Y.R.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Ethylene signaling regulates salinity stress response: An overview. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 761–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  93. Yu, Y.; Wang, J.; Shi, H.; Gu, J.; Dong, J.; Deng, X.W.; Huang, R. Salinity stress and ethylene antagonistically regulate nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of COP1 to control seed germination. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2340–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  94. Lin, Y.; Yang, L.; Paul, M.; Zu, Y.; Tang, Z. Ethylene promotes germination of Arabidopsis seed under salinity by decreasing reactive oxygen species: Evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide simulated by sodium nitroprusside. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chang, C.; Wang, B.; Shi, L.; Li, Y.; Duo, L.; Zhang, W. Alleviation of salinity stress-induced inhibition of seed germination in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by ethylene and glutamate. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1152–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, J.Y.; Luo, H.T.; Guo, Z.R. Overexpression of Malus hupehensis MhSHN1 Gene Enhances Salinity and Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco Plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 65, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lovato, M.B.; de Lemos Filho, J.P.; Martins, P.S. Growth responses of Stylosanthes humilis (Fabaceae) populations to saline stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 41, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Silva, P.O.; Medina, E.F.; Barros, R.S.; Ribeiro, D.M. Germination of salt-stressed seeds as related to the ethylene biosynthesis ability in three Stylosanthes species. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Silva, N.C.; de Souza, G.A.; Pimenta, T.M.; Brito, F.A.; Picoli, E.A.; Zsögön, A.; Ribeiro, D.M. Salinity stress inhibits germination of Stylosanthes humilis seeds through abscisic acid accumulation and associated changes in ethylene production. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zhang, S.; Yang, R.; Huo, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, G.; Huang, J.; Zheng, C.; Wu, C. Expression of cotton PLATZ1 in transgenic Arabidopsis reduces sensitivity to osmotic and salinity stress for germination and seedling establishment associated with modification of the abscisic acid, gibberellin, and ethylene signalling pathways. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  101. Ma, L.; Hu, L.; Fan, J.; Amombo, E.; Khaldun, A.B.M.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, L. Cotton GhERF38 gene is involved in plant response to salinity/drought and ABA. Ecotoxicology 2017, 26, 841–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Safari, D.; Jamali, F.; Nooryazdan, H.R.; Bayat, F. Evaluation of ACC deaminase producing ‘Pseudomonas fluorescens’ strains for their effects on seed germination and early growth of wheat under salinity stress. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2018, 12, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, H.; Lei, P.; Pang, X.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Xu, Z.; Feng, X. Enhanced tolerance to salinity stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) seedlings inoculated with the halotolerant Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, X.; Hou, C.; Zheng, K.; Li, Q.; Chen, S.; Wang, S. Overexpression of ERF96, a small ethylene response factor gene, enhances salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis. Biol. Plant 2017, 61, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wu, D.; Ji, J.; Wang, G.; Guan, C.; Jin, C. LchERF, a novel ethylene-responsive 76transcription factor from Lycium chinense, confers salinity tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 2033–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yang, F.; Chen, H.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Liu, L.; Han, X.; Wan, Z.; Sha, A. Transcriptome profile analysis of two Vicia faba cultivars with contrasting salinity tolerance during seed germination. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ahmed, W.; Imran, M.; Yaseen, M.; ul Haq, T.; Jamshaid, M.U.; Rukh, S.; Ikram, R.M.; Ali, M.; Ali, A.; Maqbool, M.; et al. Role of salicylic acid in regulating ethylene and physiological characteristics for alleviating salinity stress on germination, growth and yield of sweet pepper. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Khan, M.I.R.; Asgher, M.; Khan, N.A. Alleviation of salinity-induced photosynthesis and growth inhibition by salicylic acid involves glycinebetaine and ethylene in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.M. Salinity stress induced alterations in antioxidant metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by potassium supplementation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ahanger, M.A.; Qin, C.; Begum, N.; Maodong, Q.; Dong, X.X.; El-Esawi, M.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Zhang, L. Nitrogen availability prevents oxidative effects of salinity on wheat growth and photosynthesis by up-regulating the antioxidants and osmolytes metabolism, and secondary metabolite accumulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cheeseman, J.M. The integration of activity in saline environments: Problems and perspectives. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Bose, J.; Munns, R.; Shabala, S.; Gilliham, M.; Pogson, B.; Tyerman, S.D. Chloroplast function and ion regulation in plants growing on saline soils: Lessons from halophytes. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3129–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Van Zelm, E.; Zhang, Y.; Testerink, C. Salinity tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  114. Liu, C.; Zhao, X.; Yan, J.; Yuan, Z.; Gu, M. Effects of Salinity Stress on Growth, Photosynthesis, and Mineral Nutrients of 18 Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Cultivars. Agronomy 2020, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  115. Brito, F.A.; Pimenta, T.M.; Henschel, J.M.; Martins, S.C.; Zsögön, A.; Ribeiro, D.M. Elevated CO2 improves assimilation rate and growth of tomato plants under progressively higher soil salinity by decreasing abscisic acid and ethylene levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Murata, N.; Takahashi, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Allakhverdiev, S.I. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  117. Liu, C.; Li, L.L.; Li, G.Z.; Hao, L. Ethylene insensitive mutation improves Arabidopsis plant tolerance to NO2 exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 110043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sarafi, E.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Therios, I. Effect of calcium and boron on the ion status, carbohydrate and proline content, gas exchange parameters and growth performance of pomegranate cv. Wonderful plants grown under NaCl stress. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 2014, 1, 1606–1617. [Google Scholar]
  119. Sun, Y.; Niu, G.; Masabni, J.G.; Ganjegunte, G. Relative salinity tolerance of 22 pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars. HortScience 2018, 53, 1513–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  120. Pan, Y.J.; Liu, L.; Lin, Y.C.; Zu, Y.G.; Li, L.P.; Tang, Z.H. Ethylene antagonizes salinity-induced growth retardation and cell death process via transcriptional controlling of ethylene-, BAG-and senescence-associated genes in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  121. Splivallo, R.; Fischer, U.; Göbel, C.; Feussner, I.; Karlovsky, P. Truffles regulate plant root morphogenesis via the production of auxin and ethylene. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 2018–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  122. Nouri, M.Z.; Moumeni, A.; Komatsu, S. Abiotic stresses: Insight into gene regulation and protein expression in photosynthetic pathways of plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 20392–20416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  123. De Zélicourt, A.; Synek, L.; Saad, M.M.; Alzubaidy, H.; Jalal, R.; Xie, Y.; Andres-Barrao, C.; Rolli, E.; Guerard, F.; Mariappan, K.G.; et al. Ethylene induced plant stress tolerance by Enterobacter sp. SA187 is mediated by 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid production. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  124. Ji, J.; Yuan, D.; Jin, C.; Wang, G.; Li, X.; Guan, C. Enhancement of growth and salinity tolerance of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating ethylene production with a novel halotolerant PGPR strain Glutamicibacter sp. YD01 containing ACC deaminase activity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Foyer, C.H.; Shigeoka, S. Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  126. Considine, M.J.; Foyer, C.H. Redox regulation of plant development. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 21, 1305–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  127. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A.; Foyer, C.H. The roles of reactive oxygen metabolism in drought: Not so cut and dried. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1636–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  128. Iqbal, N.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A. Nitrogen availability regulates proline and ethylene production and alleviates salinity stress in mustard (Brassica juncea). J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 178, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, F.; Wan, X.; Zhong, Y. Nitrogen as an important detoxification factor to cadmium stress in poplar plants. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Love, A.J.; Milner, J.J.; Sadanandom, A. Timing is everything: Regulatory overlap in plant cell death. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shabala, S. Salinity and programmed cell death: Unravelling mechanisms for ion specific signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  132. Joseph, B.; Jini, D. Salinity induced programmed cell death in plants: Challenges and opportunities for salinity-tolerant plants. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 5, 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  133. Dauphinee, A.N.; Wright, H.; Rantong, G.; Gunawardena, A.H.L.A.N. The involvement of ethylene in programmed cell death and climacteric-like behaviour during the remodelling of lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves. Botany 2012, 90, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hoeberichts, F.A.; Woltering, E.J. Multiple mediators of plant programmed cell death: Interplay of conserved cell death mechanisms and plant-specific regulators. Bioessays 2003, 25, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Meng, Q.; Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kim, J.; Kramer, K.; Wang, Y.; Park, S.R.; Finkemeier, I.; Kim, S.T. A proteomic insight into the MSP1 and flg22 induced signaling in Oryza sativa leaves. J. Proteom. 2019, 196, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Meng, Q.; Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kwon, S.W.; Wang, Y.; Je, B., II; Kim, Y.J.; Jeon, J.S.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; et al. Proteomics of Rice—Magnaporthe oryzae Interaction: What Have We Learned So Far? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Meng, Q.; Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kim, J.; Kramer, K.; Wang, Y.; Park, S.R.; Finkemeier, I.; Kim, S.T. Label-free quantitative proteome data associated with MSP1 and flg22 induced signaling in rice leaves. Data Brief 2018, 20, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bi, Y.H.; Chen, W.L.; Zhang, W.N.; Zhou, Q.; Yun, L.J.; Xing, D. Production of reactive oxygen species, impairment of photosynthetic function and dynamic changes in mitochondria are early events in cadmium-induced cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Cell 2009, 101, 629–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Petrov, V.; Hille, J.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Gechev, T.S. ROS-mediated abiotic stress-induced programmed cell death in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  140. Poór, P.; Kovács, J.; Szopkó, D.; Tari, I. Ethylene signaling in salinity stress-and salicylic acid-induced programmed cell death in tomato suspension cells. Protoplasma 2013, 250, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  141. Wang, Y.; Gupta, R.; Song, W.; Huh, H.H.; Lee, S.E.; Wu, J.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kang, K.Y.; Park, S.R. Label-free quantitative secretome analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae highlights the involvement of a novel cysteine protease in its pathogenicity. J. Proteom. 2017, 169, 202–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Gupta, R.; Lee, S.J.; Min, C.W.; Kim, S.W.; Park, K.H.; Bae, D.W.; Lee, B.W.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kim, S.T. Coupling of gel-based 2-DE and 1-DE shotgun proteomics approaches to dig deep into the leaf senescence proteome of Glycine max. J. Proteom. 2016, 148, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Gupta, R.; Lee, S.J.; Min, C.W.; Kim, S.W.; Park, K.H.; Bae, D.W.; Lee, B.W.; Agrawal, G.K.; Rakwal, R.; Kim, S.T. Proteome data associated with the leaf senescence in Glycine max. Data Brief 2016, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  144. Trobacher, C.P.; Senatore, A.; Greenwood, J.S. Masterminds or minions? Cysteine proteinases in plant programmed cell death—A review. Can. J. Bot. 2006, 84, 651–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Takano, T. Two cysteine proteinase inhibitors from Arabidopsis thaliana, AtCYSa and AtCYSb, increasing the salinity, drought, oxidation and cold tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 68, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Poór, P.; Tari, I. Ethylene-regulated reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide under salinity stress in tomato cell suspension culture. Acta Biol. Szeged. 2011, 55, 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  147. Poór, P.; Szopkó, D.; Tari, I. Ionic homeostasis disturbance is involved in tomato cell death induced by NaCl and salicylic acid. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant 2012, 48, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bahieldin, A.; Atef, A.; Edris, S.; Gadalla, N.O.; Ali, H.M.; Hassan, S.M.; Al-Kordy, M.A.; Ramadan, A.M.; Makki, R.M.; Al-Hajar, A.S.; et al. Ethylene responsive transcription factor ERF109 retards PCD and improves salinity tolerance in plant. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  149. O’donnell, P.J.; Calvert, C.; Atzorn, R.; Wasternack, C.H.M.O.; Leyser, H.M.O.; Bowles, D.J. Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 1996, 274, 1914–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Hao, D.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Sarai, A. Unique mode of GCC box recognition by the DNA-binding domain of ethylene-responsive element-binding factor (ERF domain) in plant. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 26857–26861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  151. Kim, J.; Chang, C.; Tucker, M.L. To grow old: Regulatory role of ethylene and jasmonic acid in senescence. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  152. Fang, S.; Li, L.; Cui, B.; Men, S.; Shen, Y.; Yang, X. Structural insight into plant programmed cell death mediated by BAG proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2013, 69, 934–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tuteja, N.; Gill, S.S.; Trivedi, P.K.; Asif, M.H.; Nath, P. Plant growth regulators and their role in stress tolerance. Plant Nutr. Abiotic Stress Toler. I Plant Stress 2010, 4, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  154. Ludwig, A.A.; Saitoh, H.; Felix, G.; Freymark, G.; Miersch, O.; Wasternack, C.; Boller, T.; Jones, J.D.; Romeis, T. Ethylene-mediated cross-talk between calcium-dependent protein kinase and MAPK signaling controls stress responses in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10736–10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  155. Khan, N.; Bano, A.; Ali, S.; Babar, M.A. Crosstalk amongst phytohormones from planta and PGPR under biotic and abiotic stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 90, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Gratão, P.L.; Monteiro, C.C.; Carvalho, R.F.; Tezotto, T.; Piotto, F.A.; Peres, L.E.P.; Azevedo, R.A. Biochemical dissection of diageotropica and Never ripe tomato mutants to Cd-stressful conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 56, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hansen, H.; Grossmann, K. Auxin-induced ethylene triggers abscisic acid biosynthesis and growth inhibition. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1437–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  158. Javid, M.G.; Sorooshzadeh, A.; Moradi, F.; Sanavy, S.A.M.M.; Allahdadi, I. The role of phytohormones in alleviating salinity stress in crop plants. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2011, 5, 726–734. [Google Scholar]
  159. Golan, Y.; Shirron, N.; Avni, A.; Shmoish, M.; Gepstein, S. Cytokinins induce transcriptional reprograming and improve Arabidopsis plant performance under drought and salinity stress conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  160. Achard, P.; Vriezen, W.H.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Harberd, N.P. Ethylene regulates Arabidopsis development via the modulation of DELLA protein growth repressor function. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2816–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  161. Alvey, L.; Boulton, M.I. DELLA proteins in signalling. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  162. Amjad, M.; Akhtar, J.; Anwar-ul-Haq, M.; Yang, A.; Akhtar, S.S.; Jacobsen, S.E. Integrating role of ethylene and ABA in tomato plants adaptation to salinity stress. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 172, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, K.; Sun, F.; Hu, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Han, C.; Zhang, W.; Duan, Y.; et al. Arabidopsis EIN2 modulates stress response through abscisic acid response pathway. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Dong, H.; Zhen, Z.; Peng, J.; Chang, L.; Gong, Q.; Wang, N.N. Loss of ACS7 confers abiotic stress tolerance by modulating ABA sensitivity and accumulation in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4875–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  165. Gomez, C.A.; Arbona, V.; Jacas, J.; PrimoMillo, E.; Talon, M. Abscisic acid reduces leaf abscission and increases salinity tolerance in citrus plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 21, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhao, Y.; Dong, W.; Zhang, N.; Ai, X.; Wang, M.; Huang, Z.; Xiao, L.; Xia, G. A wheat allene oxide cyclase gene enhances salinity tolerance via jasmonate signaling. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  168. Benazzouk, S.; Dobrev, P.I.; Djazouli, Z.; Motyka, V.; Lutts, S. Positive impact of vermicompost leachate on salinity stress resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at the seedling stage: A phytohormonal approach. Plant Soil 2020, 446, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yoon, J.Y.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, I.J. Methyl jasmonate alleviated salinity stress in soybean. J. Crop. Sci. Biotech. 2009, 12, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Pedranzani, H.; Sierra-de-Grado, R.; Vigliocco, A.; Miersch, O.; Abdala, G. Cold and water stresses produce changes in endogenous jasmonates in two populations of Pinus pinaster Ait. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 52, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Kang, D.J.; Seo, Y.J.; Lee, J.D.; Ishii, R.; Kim, K.U.; Shin, D.H.; Park, S.K.; Jang, S.W.; Lee, I.J. Jasmonic acid differentially affects growth, ion uptake and abscisic acid concentration in salinity-tolerant and salinity-sensitive rice cultivars. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2005, 191, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Yang, J.; Duan, G.; Li, C.; Liu, L.; Han, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C. The Crosstalks Between Jasmonic Acid and Other Plant Hormone Signaling Highlight the Involvement of Jasmonic Acid as a Core Component in Plant Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  173. Munné-Bosch, S.; Simancas, B.; Müller, M. Ethylene signaling cross-talk with other hormones in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to contrasting phosphate availability: Differential effects in roots, leaves and fruits. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 226, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Jiroutova, P.; Oklestkova, J.; Strnad, M. Crosstalk between brassinosteroids and ethylene during plant growth and under abiotic stress conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  175. Wang, B.; Zhang, J.; Xia, X.; Zhang, W.H. Ameliorative effect of brassinosteroid and ethylene on germination of cucumber seeds in the presence of sodium chloride. Plant Grow. Regul. 2011, 65, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhu, T.; Deng, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Zou, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, D.; Lin, H. Ethylene and hydrogen peroxide are involved in brassinosteroid-induced salinity tolerance in tomato. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Figure 1. Role of ethylene signaling in seed germination under salinity stress. Ethylene induced by salinity stress activates the signaling pathway by inhibiting the active receptors and by releasing the Constitutive Triple Response1 (CTR1). Salinity-induced ethylene signal is transduced mainly through the classical receptors–CTR1-Ethylene-Insensitive2 (EIN2)-EIN3 pathway to regulate many effectors involved in plant growth and salinity response. EIN3/EIN3-Like (EIL) promotes the entry of Constitutive Photomorphogenesis1 (COP1) into the nucleus and degrades the Elongated Hypocotyl5 (HY5) protein, which inhibits seed germination by upregulating ABI5 gene expression. Degradation of HY5 inhibits the expression of ABI5 and ultimately induced seed germination under salinity stress. On the other hand, EIN3/EIL also directly induces seed germination by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) through upregulating peroxidase activities.
Figure 1. Role of ethylene signaling in seed germination under salinity stress. Ethylene induced by salinity stress activates the signaling pathway by inhibiting the active receptors and by releasing the Constitutive Triple Response1 (CTR1). Salinity-induced ethylene signal is transduced mainly through the classical receptors–CTR1-Ethylene-Insensitive2 (EIN2)-EIN3 pathway to regulate many effectors involved in plant growth and salinity response. EIN3/EIN3-Like (EIL) promotes the entry of Constitutive Photomorphogenesis1 (COP1) into the nucleus and degrades the Elongated Hypocotyl5 (HY5) protein, which inhibits seed germination by upregulating ABI5 gene expression. Degradation of HY5 inhibits the expression of ABI5 and ultimately induced seed germination under salinity stress. On the other hand, EIN3/EIL also directly induces seed germination by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) through upregulating peroxidase activities.
Biomolecules 10 00959 g001
Figure 2. Functions of ethylene in the regulation of photosynthesis under salinity stress. In the absence of ethylene, salinity stress results in an imbalance of Na+/K+ homeostasis, which leads to the production of ROS. This salinity-induced ROS production, in turn, exerts oxidative stress on plants, resulting in stomatal closure and reduced activity of CO2-fixing enzymes, resulting in a decrease in photosynthesis. In the presence of ethylene, Na+/K+ homeostasis and nutrients homeostasis are maintained, and the antioxidant defense mechanism is activated, which limits ROS production, thereby preventing ROS-induced oxidative stress. In the absence of oxidative stress, the rate of photosynthesis is maintained even during salinity stress.
Figure 2. Functions of ethylene in the regulation of photosynthesis under salinity stress. In the absence of ethylene, salinity stress results in an imbalance of Na+/K+ homeostasis, which leads to the production of ROS. This salinity-induced ROS production, in turn, exerts oxidative stress on plants, resulting in stomatal closure and reduced activity of CO2-fixing enzymes, resulting in a decrease in photosynthesis. In the presence of ethylene, Na+/K+ homeostasis and nutrients homeostasis are maintained, and the antioxidant defense mechanism is activated, which limits ROS production, thereby preventing ROS-induced oxidative stress. In the absence of oxidative stress, the rate of photosynthesis is maintained even during salinity stress.
Biomolecules 10 00959 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of hormonal cross-talk under salinity stress. Details of the cross-talk are given in the text. Abbreviations used: BR: Brassinosteroids, IAA: Indole-acetic acid. CK: Cytokinin, ABA: Abscisic acid, GA: Gibberellin, JA: Jasmonic acid.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of hormonal cross-talk under salinity stress. Details of the cross-talk are given in the text. Abbreviations used: BR: Brassinosteroids, IAA: Indole-acetic acid. CK: Cytokinin, ABA: Abscisic acid, GA: Gibberellin, JA: Jasmonic acid.
Biomolecules 10 00959 g003
Figure 4. A schematic representation of ethylene regulation under salinity stress. When plants encounter ionic imbalance, nutrient imbalance, and osmotic stress under salinity stress, activation of upstream mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) leads to the gradual phosphorylation and successive activation of downstream mitogen activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKKs) and MAPKs that further phosphorylates ACS2/6. The phosphorylated ACS2/6 stabilizes and thus enhances the production of ethylene through ethylene biosynthesis. Consequently, the downstream signaling activates the transcription of several ethylene-responsive genes. The transcription level of BAG (Bcl-2-associated athanogene) family genes is suppressed by ethylene (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)) to inhibit salinity-induced plant cell death (PCD). On the other hand, ethylene enhances ROS signaling to increase calcium ions, which in turn regulate MAPK, salinity overly sensitive (SOS), and Na+/H+ exchangers (NHX) through Na+/K+ homeostasis to provide salinity stress tolerance. Salinity stress reduces the CO2-fixing enzymes in chloroplast that eventually produce ROS. Scavenging of ROS occurs through both enzymatic (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR)) and nonenzymatic (ascorbic acid (AsA), glutathione (GSH), α-tocopherol (TOC), flavonoids, and carotenoids) antioxidant defense systems.
Figure 4. A schematic representation of ethylene regulation under salinity stress. When plants encounter ionic imbalance, nutrient imbalance, and osmotic stress under salinity stress, activation of upstream mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) leads to the gradual phosphorylation and successive activation of downstream mitogen activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKKs) and MAPKs that further phosphorylates ACS2/6. The phosphorylated ACS2/6 stabilizes and thus enhances the production of ethylene through ethylene biosynthesis. Consequently, the downstream signaling activates the transcription of several ethylene-responsive genes. The transcription level of BAG (Bcl-2-associated athanogene) family genes is suppressed by ethylene (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)) to inhibit salinity-induced plant cell death (PCD). On the other hand, ethylene enhances ROS signaling to increase calcium ions, which in turn regulate MAPK, salinity overly sensitive (SOS), and Na+/H+ exchangers (NHX) through Na+/K+ homeostasis to provide salinity stress tolerance. Salinity stress reduces the CO2-fixing enzymes in chloroplast that eventually produce ROS. Scavenging of ROS occurs through both enzymatic (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR)) and nonenzymatic (ascorbic acid (AsA), glutathione (GSH), α-tocopherol (TOC), flavonoids, and carotenoids) antioxidant defense systems.
Biomolecules 10 00959 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riyazuddin, R.; Verma, R.; Singh, K.; Nisha, N.; Keisham, M.; Bhati, K.K.; Kim, S.T.; Gupta, R. Ethylene: A Master Regulator of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060959

AMA Style

Riyazuddin R, Verma R, Singh K, Nisha N, Keisham M, Bhati KK, Kim ST, Gupta R. Ethylene: A Master Regulator of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(6):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riyazuddin, Riyazuddin, Radhika Verma, Kalpita Singh, Nisha Nisha, Monika Keisham, Kaushal Kumar Bhati, Sun Tae Kim, and Ravi Gupta. 2020. "Ethylene: A Master Regulator of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants" Biomolecules 10, no. 6: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop