Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles in the Development of the Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Update
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Conservation and Adaptation of the Bacterial Flagella Motor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biom10111493
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

XIAP’s Profile in Human Cancer

by
Huailu Tu
and
Max Costa
*
Department of Environmental Medicine, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(11), 1493; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111493
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 25 October 2020 / Published: 29 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

XIAP, the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein, regulates cell death signaling pathways through binding and inhibiting caspases. Mounting experimental research associated with XIAP has shown it to be a master regulator of cell death not only in apoptosis, but also in autophagy and necroptosis. As a vital decider on cell survival, XIAP is involved in the regulation of cancer initiation, promotion and progression. XIAP up-regulation occurs in many human diseases, resulting in a series of undesired effects such as raising the cellular tolerance to genetic lesions, inflammation and cytotoxicity. Hence, anti-tumor drugs targeting XIAP have become an important focus for cancer therapy research. RNA–XIAP interaction is a focus, which has enriched the general profile of XIAP regulation in human cancer. In this review, the basic functions of XIAP, its regulatory role in cancer, anti-XIAP drugs and recent findings about RNA–XIAP interactions are discussed.

1. Introduction

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), also known as inhibitor of apoptosis protein 3 (IAP3), baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 4 (BIRC4), and human IAPs like protein (hILP), belongs to IAP family which was discovered in insect baculovirus [1]. Eight different IAPs have been isolated from human tissues: NAIP (BIRC1), BIRC2 (cIAP1), BIRC3 (cIAP2), XIAP (BIRC4), BIRC5 (survivin), BIRC6 (apollon), BIRC7 (livin) and BIRC8 [2]. Like other human IAPs, XIAP inhibits cell death mainly through blocking apoptosis. However, unlike other human IAPs, XIAP is not very conserved in sequence and structure, hence it is also called human IAP like protein (hILP) [3].
XIAP was identified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using homologous IAP sequences from the X chromosome of Cydia pomonella. Therefore, it was named X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. Further research revealed that XIAP is coded for by the Xiap gene located at Xq24-25 and this gene was present in numerous adult and fetal tissues, such as heart, brain, lung, and liver, but was undetectable in peripheral blood leukocytes. The transcript size of the Xiap gene is about 9.0 kb and contains a 1.8 kb open reading frame [4].
In addition to three IAPs characteristic BIR (baculoviral IAP repeat) motifs at the N-terminal region, full-length XIAP contains an UBA (ubiquitin-associated) domain followed by a RING finger domain. BIR domain contains a three-stranded antiparallel β-sheet and four α-helices [5]. Between the BIR1 and BIR2 domain, there is a special linker region which is critical in caspase interactions. Further NMR study revealed that the linker is the only contact site when XIAP interacts with caspase-7. The linker encompasses a major energetic determinant, while the BIR2 domain only serves a regulatory function during caspase binding and SMAC neutralization [6]. The RING domain primarily exhibits homodimer E3 ligase activity, mediating ubiquitination and degradation of many cellular proteins including XIAP itself [7]. Removing the RING domain stabilized XIAP in mouse thymocytes. However, instead of attenuating apoptosis, XIAPΔRING increases caspase activity and apoptosis, indicating that the RING domain is also essential in anti-apoptosis [8]. The UBA domain consists of triple α-helices with an additional N-terminal 310 helix, which is mainly responsible for binding with some mono-ubiquitin and diubiquitins. The observation of XIAP–UBA dimerization in NMR spectroscopy provides another possible way for XIAP to self-associate [9].
SEC-MALS experiments indicated XIAP to be monodisperse in solution, forming an approximately 115KDa homodimer with its BIR1–BIR1 and RING–RING domains adhered together at the interface. The dimerization of XIAP monomers decide its quaternary structure, as shown in Figure 1. ICP-AES revealed 10 zinc ions per homodimer: one in each BIR domain and two for every RING domain. Preliminary studies of the full-length XIAP structure, demonstrated that the XIAP homodimer exhibited compact and rigid conformation (Figure 1) [10]. These findings have consequences when studying XIAP’s interaction with other molecules, such as BIR1–TAB1 and linker/BIR2–caspase3/7 interactions [11,12]. Polykertis et al. showed that XIAP must undergo conformational rearrangement before it can directly bind with other molecules [10]. However, the components involved, and the mechanisms are not well understood. Additional high-resolution studies on XIAP’s full-length structure and conformational transition from monodisperse state to binding state are needed. Representative models of the XIAP homodimer have identified the BIR1 and RING as two dimeric binding sites, however, the UBA domain is also relevant to XIAP self-association (vide supra). Whether the UBA domain is also a part of XIAP homodimer interface is not known.

2. XIAP and Cellular Functions

Apoptosis, a highly controlled process regulating cell death, is active from embryonic development until death. XIAP prevents cell apoptosis primarily by blocking the activation and maturation of caspase-3/-7/-9, which are major initiators and effectors of apoptosis [13,14]. There are several binding scenarios for XIAP and caspase interactions. The first involves the linker-BIR2 that binds to caspase-3/-7. Additionally, BIR3 has been reported to have the capability of binding and locking caspase-9 in an inactive monomeric state [15]. The inhibition of apoptosis by XIAP was thought to be independent of the RING domain since research revealed that XIAP can still inhibit apoptosis with a mutated or deleted RING domain [3], whereas later scientists found that XIAPΔRING increased apoptosis in mouse thymocytes [8]. This contradiction makes the RING domain function even more mysterious. From most of the experiments, we tend to accept that the BIR2/3 domains are the major components responsible for the anti-apoptosis activity of XIAP. Unlike BIR2/3, the BIR1 domain of XIAP does not possess the specific IBM-binding groove. Crystal structure revealed BIR1 to be another dimerization site of XIAP [16]. Butterfly-shaped BIR1/TAB1 dimer and BIR1 dimerization were indicated to be a critical step in XIAP-induced NF-κB activation [11]. Disruption of BIR1 dimerization using a BIR1 mutant XIAPV80D and UBA domain mutant XIAPΔUBA abolished NF-κB activation. Since the XIAP UBA domain substitute, XIAPcbl-b-UBA, functions better in activating NF-κB, demonstrating that XIAP-induced NF-κB activation also resides in the UBA domain and its Ub-binding ability [17]. In addition to binding themselves or caspases, increasing studies also identified some possible binding substrates for each domain of XIAP as summarized in Table 1, which enriched XIAP’s functionality step by step.
Although, the main function of XIAP is to prevent apoptosis, additional roles are being discovered. Diablo homolog (DIABLO), also known as SMAC, is a mitochondrial inter-membrane space protein. SMAC–XIAP interaction prevents the XIAP binding to caspases and promotes cell apoptosis (Figure 2) [24]. Apart from apoptosis, XIAP also participates in the regulation of necroptosis, a cellular self-destruction program. The switch to necroptosis involves RIPK3 (Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase 3) and MLKL (Mixed Lineage Kinase domain Like pseudokinase), which were studied in mouse neutrophils [25]. XIAP is an autophagic modulator. Clinical studies show that the expression of XIAP is inversely associated with autophagy biomarker LC3 in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues [26]. At the same time, Huang et al. reported that XIAP inhibited autophagy and promoted tumorigenesis through the Mdm2-p53 mediated signaling pathway [27]. Additionally, XIAP limits caspase-8 dependent IL-1β processing, and also exhibits a regulatory role in innate immunity through NOD2 (Nucleotide-binding Oligomerization Domain-containing protein 2) signaling. Loss of XIAP is caused immunodeficiency and inflammation [28]. XIAP was also identified as a metalloprotein, since both of the three BIR domains and the RING domain possess zinc binding motifs [29]. Additionally XIAP is also a copper binding protein through all three BIR domains [29,30]. It has been established that XIAP is involved in maintaining copper homeostasis through negatively regulating MURR1, a recently found copper homeostasis factor. XIAP binds to and ubiquitinates MURR1 leading to its degradation without affecting XIAP’s anti-apoptotic property [31].
To date, XIAP is believed to be the most potent anti-apoptotic and death-preventing protein in existence. As displayed in Figure 2, XIAP is mainly responsible for anti-apoptosis, while it is also involved in autophagy, necroptosis and homeostasis maintenance. Dysregulation or inhibition of apoptosis is directly associated with cancer, autoimmune diseases and neurodegenerative disorders. Thus, abnormal expression of XIAP is a useful bio-marker for the early detection of cancer and other diseases (vide supra).

3. XIAP and Cancer

Apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy and the immune response are all critical biochemical activities for homeostasis, and XIAP’s ability to impact these processes is indicative of its importance in the cell. Expression of human IAPs was analyzed in the National Cancer Institute panel of 60 human tumor cell lines, and XIAP was found to be expressed in a majority of these cell lines [32]. Dysregulation of XIAP has also been shown to impact the progression of multiple cancers. XIAP is involved in activation of TGFβ transcriptional mediators, NF-κB and JNK signaling pathways in a Smad4-dependent manner (Figure 3) [21]. XIAP enables cells to undergo malignant transformation, thus preventing cell death and initiating carcinogenesis. Apart from how XIAP contributes to cancer development, the mechanisms behind XIAP stabilization and up-regulation needs to be understood.

3.1. Bladder Cancer

Early diagnosis of bladder carcinoma remains a challenge. The combination of XIAP mRNA detection and voided urinary cytology achieved better specificity and sensitivity, demonstrating that XIAP was a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker in low-grade bladder cancer [33].
Both the BIR and RING domains of XIAP can promote anchorage-independent growth and invasion of bladder cancer cells. By binding to E2F1 and Sp1, respectively, BIR2 and BIR3 domains initiate E2F1/Sp1-positive-feedback-loop-dependent transcription of miR-203, inhibiting Src protein translation, which leads to further MMP2-cleaved activation and BC (Bladder Cancer) invasion [13]. By suppressing miR-200a expression through PP2A/MAPKs/c-Jun pathways, the BIR region of XIAP reduces EGFR translation and subsequently facilitates anchorage-independent growth of BC cells [34]. The RING domain, on the one hand, contributes to AI (Anchorage-Independent) growth through stabilizing c-Myc protein by inhibiting its phosphorylation at Thr-58 [35]. On the other hand, it enhances miR-4295 transcription in a Sp1-dependent manner, which targets the 3′-UTR of p63α mRNA, thereby reducing p63α protein translation and enhancing urothelial cell transformation [36]. The two cases mentioned above link BIR3 and RING domains to transcription factor Sp1, illustrating the close relationship between Sp1 and XIAP, as well as revealing that transcription factors such as Sp1 are critical effectors of XIAP.
Additionally, RhoGDIβ was found to be a key downstream regulator of XIAP, promoting BC invasion in vivo and in vitro when XIAP was over expressed. In N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine (BBN) treated mice, up-regulated XIAP stabilized nucleolin mRNA via Erks, which further increased RhoGDIβ mRNA stability, BC invasion and lung metastasis [37]. Long non-coding RNA, SNHG1, was reported to promote BC invasion and autophagy. Whereas, knocking down of SNHG1 in U5637 significantly increased the XIAP protein level, which points to a potential inhibitory role of lncRNA SNHG1 on XIAP [38].

3.2. Breast Cancer

XIAP was highly expressed in human breast cancer cell lines and tissue samples from patients. Foster et al. showed that the breast cancer biopsies exhibited increased XIAP in contrast to normal level in non-cancerous breast tissues [39]. Through Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariate analysis, Wang et al. found that a high XIAP expression level was associated with poor prognosis [40]. This research validated that XIAP was a reliable bio-marker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Although the mechanisms of how XIAP was increased in cancers is not known, preliminary studies have shown it can be expressed by transcription factors such as NF-κB. In turn, high expression levels of XIAP lead to TAK1 ubiquitylation and degradation, which further blocks JNK activation, NF-κB activation stimulated by JNK and the formation of a feedback loop (Figure 3) [21]. Other transcription factor, such as RPS3 (Ribosomal Protein S3), facilitated XIAP protein expression in a NF-κB independent manner [41]. Collectively, XIAP was shown to be involved in cascades of many transcription factors. It either modulates the activation of these transcription factors, or is regulated by these factors.
Aggressive breast cancer is mainly regulated by the MNK/XIAP/NF-κB axis, MNK (MAPK iNteracting Kinase) activation increases the XIAP protein, facilitating the interaction between BIR1 domain and TAB1 (TGFβ-associated binding protein) together with its cognate kinase TAK1. This binding further contributes to the phosphorylation of NF-κB activating kinase, IKKβ, and then NF-κB is released into the nucleus activating expression downstream genes and contributing to tumor cell proliferation, growth and migration [42]. XIAP, working as a bridge, links MAPK signaling and NF-κB hyperactivation, facilitating breast cancer progression. XIAP was also reported to promote breast cancer cell proliferation, enhanced viability, and colony formation via its E3 ligase activity, leading p62 to ubiquitin-proteosome degradation (Figure 3) [43].

3.3. Lung Cancer

In lung cancer, micro RNAs seem to be a dominant initiator of XIAP, regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. Several micro RNAs, such as miR-142 and miR-CHA1, were reported to participate in XIAP-mediated cell proliferation and apoptosis in human lung cancer [44,45]. Hence, RNA mimics targeting XIAP are being intensely studied for their potential utilization in cancer therapy. In addition, the XIAP/TAK1/NF-κB pathway is being studied in lung cancer as well. BMP (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins) and TGFβ specifically activate XIAP/TAK1/Id1 signaling and increase cellular resistance to cell death and drug sensitivity, however this activation undoubtedly increases carcinogenesis and provides an opportunity for activated cells to escape the toxicity of drug treatment [46]. Apart from the classic modulating pathway of caspase-3/-7/-9, caspase-8 was involved in enhancing apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer upon retinoic acid-inducible-gene-I-like receptor agonist and ionizing radiation cotreatment [47]. Cellular caspase-8 and caspase-9 function differently at distinct stages, the triggers they respond to may differ as well. Caspase-8 depression induced by Bcl-2 may account for drug resistance in lung cancer cells as well [48].

3.4. Colon Cancer

In colon cancer, up-regulation of XIAP inhibits not only apoptosis but also autophagy [49]. TGFβ is thought to increase XIAP level upstream by extracellular signals in colon cancer. Attenuation of TGFβ signaling leads to IRS-1 (Insulin Receptor Substrate-1) activation through phosphorylated Smad3, further increasing XIAP protein level and cell survival [50]. Previous studies demonstrated a critical role of the BIR domain in promoting colon cancer anchorage-independent growth and G1/S phase transition through E2F1/Cyclin E axis. When the RING domain loses its function, the BIR domain would allow XIAP to enter the nucleus and regulate E2F1 transcriptional activity via binding [51]. This mechanism may be applicable to many XIAP-RING-domain-mutations-caused diseases.
Except for XIAP’s canonical function in apoptosis and autophagy, the role XIAP plays in disrupting the success of chemotherapy has been widely studied in colon cancer. Generally, XIAP exhibits high expression, specifically in cancer cells, contributing to cancer progression by modifying cell’s resistance to death. The resistance to death renders cells with greater uncontrolled proliferation, invasion and metastasis. Most chemotherapeutic drugs kill cancer cells by cytotoxicity. Normally, cells would combat the cytotoxic stimuli by stressing themselves. When the stimuli overloads, cells would exhibit programmed cell death either by apoptosis, necroptosis or autophagy. XIAP directly amplifies the extent of cellular chemo-resistance by inhibiting the cell death pathways, which unintentionally enhances their resistance to programed cell death. Research has revealed that, HtrA1 down-regulation increases cisplatin resistance by enhancing XIAP protein stability through activating PI3K/AKT pathways [52]. Another study by Zhang et al. Demonstrated that AKT inhibitor, MK2206, reversed miR-587-conferred 5-FU resistance. miR-587 increased AKT activation through restricting PPP2R1B, thus showing that the phosphorylation of AKT was crucial for maintaining XIAP protein stability [53].

3.5. Other Cancers

In prostate cancer, RNA binding protein FUS, together with a circular RNA (circRNA0005276), can directly bind to the XIAP promoter region, facilitating transcription of XIAP mRNA and thus, increasing the XIAP protein level [54]. Many micro RNAs, such as miR-137, influenced the mRNA stability of XIAP by binding to its 3′-UTR in ovarian cancer [55]. It is believed that XIAP participates in raising cellular resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, since miR-519d and miR-149 sensitized ovarian cancers to cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity by suppressing XIAP [56,57]. Simultaneous inhibition of XIAP and Survivin dramatically reduced cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells (Panc-1), mediated by the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathways [58]. Treatment with XIAP inhibitors brought significant reduction in malignant proliferation in a series of cancers, including gastric cancer, leukemia, and others [59,60].

4. XIAP: A Potential Anti-Tumor Target

XIAP, by inhibiting cell death and facilitating pro-survival pathways, promotes tumor initiation, promotion and progression. Given the detrimental nature of XIAP and mounting data linking XIAP to various types of cancers, focus has been directed to the development of anti-XIAP drugs.

4.1. Inhibitors or Antagonists of XIAP

Elevated XIAP protein level promotes tumor invasion and metastasis. Drugs targeting XIAP for preventing cancer progression have been identified. At present, anti-XIAP drug development mainly centers around antisense oligonucleotides and small molecule antagonists.
The antisense oligonucleotides, such as siRNA (small interfering RNA) or shRNA (short hairpin RNA), specifically bind to mRNA of XIAP. They either silence the mRNA or impair its stability, resulting in decreased XIAP protein levels. While constructing the interfering RNA is not challenging, its delivery into cells in vivo without compromising the efficiency is met with difficulty. Chemical modification and lipid particle encapsulation technologies are harnessed in modern nucleotide therapy. The former prevents nucleotides from degrading and the latter ensures efficient uptake [61]. AEG35156, a second-generation XIAP antisense oligonucleotide, is being tested for multi-purpose anti-tumor use in clinical trials [62].
Small molecule antagonists are synthetic compounds that encompass functional binding sites as substrate and can competitively bind to the target protein. Molecular antagonists of XIAP competitively occupy XIAP, and affect caspase activity. Thus far, the most promising small molecule antagonists of XIAP are SMAC mimetics. SMAC is a mitochondrial inter-membrane protein and also an endogenous XIAP inhibitor released by mitochondria in response to cell death signals. It induces cell death by binding and inactivating XIAP protein, preventing it from inhibiting apoptosis. According to 3D model analysis of SMAC protein structure and spatial conformation of a SMAC–XIAP complex, SMAC mimetics are being intensely studied for their therapeutic use to block the cell death inhibition of XIAP. They mimic the binding site of SMAC to XIAP at four amino acids, and specifically recognize and bind to the BIR2 and BIR3 domain of XIAP [16,63]. A number of SMAC mimetics have been tested clinically for dose limitation and safety, as summarized in Table 2. In addition to the pioneering human clinical trials, several preclinical studies using SMAC mimetics to switch on cell death are being conducted in animals. SMAC mimetics facilitate apoptosis not only from inactivation of XIAP but also from induction of FADD-RIP1-Caspase8 complex formation, which subsequently releases caspase-8 to produce caspase-3/7 and then induces apoptosis. Additionally, SMAC mimetics free NIKs, which subsequently lead to non-canonical NF-kB activation by facilitating cIAPs degradation [64].

4.2. XIAP Promotes Cellular Resistance to Cancer Therapy

XIAP contributes to the tumor development and increases the resistance of oncogenic cells to cancer treatments, among which the most extensively studied are chemotherapy and radiotherapy. High XIAP levels have been reported to be associated with chemo-therapeutic sensitivity, particularly cytarabine and other nucleosides [32]. Sraraei et al. found that several anti-leukemic agents acting via XIAP down-regulation rescued the efficacy of TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) in leukemia [65]. Specific siRNA, targeting XIAP, promoted apoptosis and enhanced cellular sensitivity to paclitaxel in ovarian cancer environment [66]. A shift in balance between XIAP and SMAC proteins accompanied the degree of radiotherapy resistance in rectal cancer [67]. These studies demonstrated the role of XIAP in cellular resistance to chemo- and radio- therapeutics and pointed out that the combination of down-regulated XIAP and anti-tumor drugs achieved synergistic efficacy.
Prior to developing anti-XIAP agents, the mechanism of how these agents induce resistance through XIAP should be considered and understood. When studying the resistance mechanism caused by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, JNJ-2648158 investigators found that activated c-Fos facilitated AP-1 generation and subsequently promoted XIAP transcription [68]. The clinical outcome of JNJ-2648158 was impaired by its transcription factor activating role and subsequent elevation of XIAP expression. Pretreatment with the JNK inhibitor, SP600125, rescued the cisplatin induced decrease in XIAP and other drug resistance associated genes at both the mRNA and protein levels in A549 and H446 cells [69]. This reinforced the notion that lung cancer resistance to cisplatin was mediated by the JNK-XIAP axis. The majority of XIAP function studies in tumors, concluded that XIAP is key regulator, potentiating tumor cells to survive. However, studies like these also showed that single XIAP elevations did not confer chemoresistance. Seeger et al. mocked XIAP expression level in tumor cells, they found that long-term XIAP overexpression actually did not increase resistance to chemotherapeutics. However, this kind of homeostasis could be disturbed by a XIAP antagonist such as SMAC, which means that XIAP dysregulation in tumor must be accompanied by the disturbance of its modulators [70]. Development of XIAP as a good prognostic marker, requires more intense study of XIAP and its many modulators.

4.3. Novel Drug Development by Targeting XIAP

It has been suggested that the advantages of inhibiting XIAP outweigh those of antagonizing any other IAPs for several reasons: (1) High abnormal expression of XIAP has been linked to poor prognosis of several types of cancers, including colon cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer and others. [42,73]; (2) Elevated expression levels of XIAP were positively related to resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [67,74]; (3) In addition, XIAP is implicated to modulate tumor cells resistance to immunotherapy, with evidence showing that XIAP is responsible for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in caspase-dependent and -independent mechanisms in inflammatory breast cancer cells [75]. These findings emphasize the detrimental effect of XIAP and highlight the importance of XIAP inhibitors or antagonists in chemotherapy.
However, elevated XIAP alone does not enhance the pro-survival rate of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, although XIAP overexpression has been identified in many tumors and is believed to be the reason for raising chemo-resistance, but chemo-resistance reversal will not occur by only down-regulating XIAP. The upstream and downstream regulators or antagonists of XIAP must be considered when developing new drugs.
The characterization of XIAP to be a drug target for cancer therapy occurred more than ten years ago [76]. Many drugs like small molecule antagonists and antisense oligonucleotides have moved into phase II or III clinical trials, as listed in Table 2. Next-generation novel drug development adopts fragment-based and structure-based methods incorporating X-ray crystallography, computational analysis and NMR solution conformational studies. Potent non peptidomimetic small molecule orally bioavailable antagonist inhibiting both XIAP and cIAP1 have been identified [77]. Many of the known anti-XIAP drugs have more than one target, for instance ASTX660 can antagonize both XIAP and cIAP1/2 [78]. Will drugs with multiple IAP targets achieve a better clinical effect than those that only target XIAP? Another consideration is what part of the XIAP molecule should be targeted. The caspase inhibition is mainly carried on by BIR2/3 domains, the linker upstream of BIR2 domain is believed to be the most essential site when interacting with caspase-3/7. Should the new drug occupy all the possible caspase binding sites to achieve the best inhibition efficacy? Finally, as a compact protein, XIAP has its own way of undergoing conformational changes when interacting with other molecules, but very little is known about this process.

5. XIAP and Non-Coding RNA

XIAP has been shown to interact with various proteins, such as caspases, SMAC, etc. In recent years, our understanding of how XIAP interacts with these different molecules has improved considerably. In addition to protein–XIAP interactions, it has been found to interact with RNAs. Among these XIAP-binding RNAs, the most interesting ones are those involving non-coding RNAs because they bring new insight into how XIAP is regulated in cells.
The most common RNAs are messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). XIAP has been found to interact with non-coding RNAs which can be divided into two subtypes: structural non-coding RNA and regulatory non-coding RNA. Among the regulatory non-coding RNA, numerous small non-coding RNAs and long non-coding RNAs have been found to impact gene expression during transcription and translation. The regulatory non-coding RNAs are also involved in XIAP regulation during cancer progression. They either influence the integrity of XIAP mRNA or act as effectors of XIAP to amplify signals through binding to their 3′-UTR. Although non-coding RNAs do not directly translate into proteins, they work actively in distinct ways that impact cellular function.

5.1. Long Non-Coding RNA

Non-coding RNA with a length over 200nt are classified as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). lncRNA account for the majority of the ncRNAs and are essential for regulating gene expression [79]. Emerging evidence demonstrates that lncRNA may be a key link to tumorigenesis, and XIAP is one of the proteins they target.
Long non-coding RNA CRNDE (Colorectal Neoplasia Differentially Expressed) was the first lncRNA reported to regulate XIAP. CRNDE was found to decrease the XIAP protein level by negatively regulating miR-186 which specifically binds to the 3′-UTR of XIAP and impairs its stability in glioma stem cells [80]. Sp1 is a well-known transcription factor that can specifically bind to the XIAP promoter region and facilitate XIAP gene transcription. lncRNA XIAP-AS1 was found to interact with Sp1 and thereby improve XIAP transcription level and reduce apoptosis in gastric cancer cells [81]. Recently, XIAP-AS1 has been found to play an oncogenic role by interfering with STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) phosphorylation and EMT (Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition) markers expression [82].

5.2. Micro RNA

Ectopic expression of XIAP 3 prime untranslated region improves cell proliferation, tumor growth, colony formation, migration and invasion in human breast cancer. The 3′-UTR of XIAP itself functions as ceRNA (competing endogenous RNA) and thus, frees FSCN1 from miR-29a-5p, which increases the motility of cells in breast cancer [83]. miR-200 is a set of micro RNA family involved in cancer metastasis. This family includes: miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-429, miR-200c, miR-141. Among them, miR-200a and miR-200c were reported to participate in XIAP cascades in bladder cancer cells. In particular, miR-200c directly binds to 3′-UTR of XIAP and reduces XIAP mRNA stability. Thus, down-regulation of miR-200c stabilizes XIAP mRNA and facilitates BC invasion and lung metastasis [84]. The number of micro RNA that have been reported to have direct interaction with XIAP is increasing.

5.3. Circular RNA

As single stranded polynucleotides, secondary structures of RNA enable them to pair with themselves, rendering the RNA with enhanced stability. Except for most linear RNA, another type of RNA that forms a covalently closed loop with its 3′- and 5′- ends adhered together is called circular RNA (circRNA). Most types of circRNAs are classified as non-coding RNA and regulate gene expression. Although, some of them have been shown to encode proteins, gene expression regulation remains their prominent role [85].
Zhang et al. first revealed that over-expression of Circ_0005015 led to increased XIAP expression by inhibiting miR-519d-3p activity [86]. The positive correlation of circRNA0005276 and XIAP was mediated by FUS. circRNA0005276 promoted XIAP transcription and facilitated proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells [54]. By targeting XIAP, circPAN3 enhanced chemo-resistance in acute myeloid leukemia with miR-153-3p/miR-183-5p as intermediates [87]. Very limited studies have been carried on the relationship between circular RNA and XIAP. No such evidence has been found in support of circular RNA’s ability to directly couple with XIAP. Micro RNAs tend to be the dominating intermediate that regulate XIAP.

6. Conclusions and Discussion

Originally defined as apoptosis inhibitor protein, XIAP fulfills its mission by binding with apoptosis initiator caspase-9 and effector caspase-3/7, marking them for proteosome degradation by ubiquitination. However, as research on XIAP progresses, XIAP has been found to be involved in many other cell death pathways, including autophagy, necroptosis and copper homeostasis. When it comes to XIAP, it should not be regarded only as apoptosis inhibitor, but rather as a master cell death resistance regulator.
Due to its critical position in preventing cell death, over-expression of XIAP enhances cell tolerance to external and internal stimuli. XIAP over-expression has been validated in numerous types of cancer cells with qRT-PCR and Western blot, and has been linked to malignant transformation, increased proliferation and metastasis. Studies on how XIAP is up-regulated include transcription factors, TNF/JNK/NF-κB signaling pathways, together with various non-coding RNA. More and more studies rendered XIAP a reliable bio-marker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
A number of drugs targeting XIAP are under development, which are mainly antisense oligonucleotides and small molecule antagonists. Several of them have been shown to be effective clinically. Combined administration of cancer treatments together with anti-XIAP drugs are being tested. Differentiated XIAP expression profile among cancer patients assigned the higher XIAP expression subgroup for worse outcome and poor prognosis. XIAP is a key target for therapy and also an essential factor for promoting resistance to cancer treatment. It is well supported that XIAP can make cells less sensitive to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Anti-tumor agents unavoidably trigger an XIAP induction cascade, either by activating XIAP transcription factors or by other molecular signaling pathways that can upregulate XIAP. Participation of XIAP during cancer development makes the situation more complex for remedy and reduces the overall survival rate.
Apart from canonical protein regulatory pathways that target XIAP, many non-coding RNAs are occupying an increasingly significant position in XIAP regulation. Non-coding RNA revealed new mechanisms of XIAP regulation, with micro RNA acting on messenger RNA stability by binding to the 3′-UTR of XIAP mRNA. Since the circRNA’s role and lncRNA’s role in mediating XIAP pathways still remain elusive, more work should be carried out in this area.

Author Contributions

H.T. prepared the first draft of this review. M.C. reviewed this draft and about 5 other drafts and provided clarification on gramar and provided additional input on the content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants (ES000260, ES023174, ES-029359, ES-030583 and ES-026138 and CA217929.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duckett, C.S.; Nava, V.E.; Gedrich, R.W.; Clem, R.J.; Van Dongen, J.L.; Gilfillan, M.C.; Shiels, H.; Hardwick, J.M.; Thompson, C.B. A conserved family of cellular genes related to the baculovirus iap gene and encoding apoptosis inhibitors. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 2685–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. UniProtKB-Q6PIA0 (Q6PIA0_HUMAN). Available online: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q6PIA0//URL (accessed on 29 October 2020).
  3. Duckett, C.S.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Tomaselli, K.J.; Thompson, C.B.; Armstrong, R.C. Human IAP-like protein regulates programmed cell death downstream of Bcl-xL and cytochrome c. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liston, P.; Roy, N.; Tamai, K.; Lefebvre, C.; Baird, S.; Cherton-Horvat, G.; Farahani, R.; McLean, M.; Ikeda, J.E.; MacKenzie, A.; et al. Suppression of apoptosis in mammalian cells by NAIP and a related family of IAP genes. Nature 1996, 379, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, C.; Cai, M.; Gunasekera, A.H.; Meadows, R.P.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Wu, W.; Xu, N.; Ng, S.C.; et al. NMR structure and mutagenesis of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein XIAP. Nature 1999, 401, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Y.; Park, Y.C.; Rich, R.L.; Segal, D.; Myszka, D.G.; Wu, H. Structural basis of caspase inhibition by XIAP: Differential roles of the linker versus the BIR domain. Cell 2001, 104, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakatani, Y.; Kleffmann, T.; Linke, K.; Condon, S.M.; Hinds, M.G.; Day, C.L. Regulation of ubiquitin transfer by XIAP, a dimeric RING E3 ligase. Biochem. J. 2013, 450, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schile, A.J.; García-Fernández, M.; Steller, H. Regulation of apoptosis by XIAP ubiquitin-ligase activity. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 2256–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tse, M.K.; Hui, S.K.; Yang, Y.; Yin, S.T.; Hu, H.Y.; Zou, B.; Wong, B.C.; Sze, K.H. Structural analysis of the UBA domain of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein reveals different surfaces for ubiquitin-binding and self-association. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Polykretis, P.; Luchinat, E.; Bonucci, A.; Giachetti, A.; Graewert, M.A.; Svergun, D.I.; Banci, L. Conformational characterization of full-length X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) through an integrated approach. IUCrJ 2019, 6, 948–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, M.; Lin, S.C.; Huang, Y.; Kang, Y.J.; Rich, R.; Lo, Y.C.; Myszka, D.; Han, J.; Wu, H. XIAP induces NF-kappaB activation via the BIR1/TAB1 interaction and BIR1 dimerization. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suzuki, Y.; Nakabayashi, Y.; Nakata, K.; Reed, J.C.; Takahashi, R. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) inhibits caspase-3 and -7 in distinct modes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 27058–27063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, J.; Hua, X.; Yang, R.; Jin, H.; Li, J.; Zhu, J.; Tian, Z.; Huang, M.; Jiang, G.; Huang, H.; et al. XIAP Interaction with E2F1 and Sp1 via its BIR2 and BIR3 domains specific activated MMP2 to promote bladder cancer invasion. Oncogenesis 2019, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, Y.J.; Jang, M.; Park, Y.K.; Kang, S.; Bae, K.H.; Cho, S.; Lee, C.K.; Park, B.C.; Chi, S.W.; Park, S.G. Molecular interaction between HAX-1 and XIAP inhibits apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 393, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, S.; Ji, C.; Zhang, J.Z.H. Molecular basis of SMAC-XIAP binding and the effect of electrostatic polarization. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, Y.; Rich, R.L.; Myszka, D.G.; Wu, H. Requirement of both the second and third BIR domains for the relief of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP)-mediated caspase inhibition by Smac. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 49517–49522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bornstein, B.; Gottfried, Y.; Edison, N.; Shekhtman, A.; Lev, T.; Glaser, F.; Larisch, S. ARTS binds to a distinct domain in XIAP-BIR3 and promotes apoptosis by a mechanism that is different from other IAP-antagonists. Apoptosis 2011, 16, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Zhang, D.; Luo, W.; Yu, J.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, X.R.; Huang, C. E3 ligase activity of XIAP RING domain is required for XIAP-mediated cancer cell migration, but not for its RhoGDI binding activity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deveraux, Q.L.; Takahashi, R.; Salvesen, G.S.; Reed, J.C. X-linked IAP is a direct inhibitor of cell-death proteases. Nature 1997, 388, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lawen, A. Apoptosis-an introduction. Bioessays 2003, 25, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dubrez-Daloz, L.; Dupoux, A.; Cartier, J. XIAPs: More than just inhibitors of apoptosis proteins. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 1036–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, S.C.; Huang, Y.; Lo, Y.C.; Lu, M.; Wu, H. Crystal structure of the BIR1 domain of XIAP in two crystal forms. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gyrd-Hansen, M.; Darding, M.; Miasari, M.; Santoro, M.M.; Zender, L.; Xue, W.; Tenev, T.; da Fonseca, P.C.; Zvelebil, M.; Bujnicki, J.M. XIAPs contain an evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin-binding domain that regulates NF-kappaB as well as cell survival and oncogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 1309–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Srinivasula, S.M.; Hegde, R.; Saleh, A.; Datta, P.; Shiozaki, E.; Chai, J.; Lee, R.A.; Robbins, P.D.; Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Shi, Y.; et al. A conserved XIAP-interaction motif in caspase-9 and Smac/DIABLO regulates caspase activity and apoptosis. Nature 2001, 410, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wicki, S.; Gurzeler, U.; Wei-Lynn Wong, W.; Jost, P.J.; Bachmann, D.; Kaufmann, T. Loss of XIAP facilitates switch to TNFα-induced necroptosis in mouse neutrophils. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, W.Y.; Kim, H.; Zhang, C.L.; Meng, X.L.; Wu, Z.S. Clinical significance of autophagic protein LC3 levels and its correlation with XIAP expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, X.; Wu, Z.; Mei, Y.; Wu, M. XIAP inhibits autophagy via XIAP-Mdm2-p53 signalling. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 2204–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lalaoui, N.; Vaux, D.L. Recent advances in understanding inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. F1000Research 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hou, M.M.; Polykretis, P.; Luchinat, E.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.N.; Zuo, H.H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.L.; Ye, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Solution structure and interaction with copper in vitro and in living cells of the first BIR domain of XIAP. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, Y.; Ewing, P.M.; Laursen, W.J.; Tripp, V.T.; Singh, S.; Splan, K.E. Copper-binding properties of the BIR2 and BIR3 domains of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014, 140, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burstein, E.; Ganesh, L.; Dick, R.D.; van De Sluis, B.; Wilkinson, J.C.; Klomp, L.W.; Wijmenga, C.; Brewer, G.J.; Nabel, G.J.; Duckett, C.S. A novel role for XIAP in copper homeostasis through regulation of MURR1. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tamm, I.; Kornblau, S.M.; Segall, H.; Krajewski, S.; Welsh, K.; Kitada, S.; Scudiero, D.A.; Tudor, G.; Qui, Y.H.; Monks, A.; et al. Expression and prognostic significance of IAP-family genes in human cancers and myeloid leukemias. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar]
  33. Srivastava, A.K.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, D.; Dalela, D.; Rath, S.K.; Goel, M.M.; Bhatt, M.L. Evaluation of urinary XIAP as a diagnostic biomarker of carcinoma of urinary bladder. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 8243–8248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, C.; Zeng, X.; Jiang, G.; Liao, X.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Jin, H.; Zhu, J.; Sun, H.; Wu, X.R.; et al. XIAP BIR domain suppresses miR-200a expression and subsequently promotes EGFR protein translation and anchorage-independent growth of bladder cancer cell. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, G.; Huang, C.; Liao, X.; Li, J.; Wu, X.R.; Zeng, F.; Huang, C. The RING domain in the anti-apoptotic protein XIAP stabilizes c-Myc protein and preserves anchorage-independent growth of bladder cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5935–5944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jin, H.; Xu, J.; Guo, X.; Huang, H.; Li, J.; Peng, M.; Zhu, J.; Tian, Z.; Wu, X.R.; Tang, M.S.; et al. XIAP RING domain mediates miR-4295 expression and subsequently inhibiting p63α protein translation and promoting transformation of bladder epithelial cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 56540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, Y.; Jin, H.; Xu, J.; Gu, J.; Li, X.; Xie, Q.; Huang, H.; Li, J.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, G.; et al. XIAP overexpression promotes bladder cancer invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo via enhancing nucleolin-mediated Rho-GDIβ mRNA stability. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2040–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, J.; Yang, R.; Hua, X.; Huang, M.; Tian, Z.; Li, J.; Lam, H.Y.; Jiang, G.; Cohen, M.; Huang, C. lncRNA SNHG1 Promotes Basal Bladder Cancer Invasion via Interaction with PP2A Catalytic Subunit and Induction of Autophagy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 21, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Foster, F.M.; Owens, T.W.; Tanianis-Hughes, J.; Clarke, R.B.; Brennan, K.; Bundred, N.J.; Streuli, C.H. Targeting inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in combination with ErbB antagonists in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Ji, R.; Gu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Sun, B. Prognostic value of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein for invasive ductal breast cancer with triple-negative phenotype. Hum. Pathol. 2010, 41, 1186–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ono, H.; Iizumi, Y.; Goi, W.; Sowa, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Sakai, T. Ribosomal protein S3 regulates XIAP expression independently of the NF-κB pathway in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 3205–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Evans, M.K.; Brown, M.C.; Geradts, J.; Bao, X.; Robinson, T.J.; Jolly, M.K.; Vermeulen, P.B.; Palmer, G.M.; Gromeier, M.; Levine, H.; et al. XIAP Regulation by MNK Links MAPK and NFκB Signaling to Determine an Aggressive Breast Cancer Phenotype. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 1726–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, X.; Wang, X.N.; Yuan, X.D.; Wu, W.Y.; Lobie, P.E.; Wu, Z. XIAP facilitates breast and colon carcinoma growth via promotion of p62 depletion through ubiquitination-dependent proteasomal degradation. Oncogene 2019, 38, 1448–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, X.B.; Li, Q.H.; Zhang, N.; Li, M.; Li, K. MiR-142 inhibits lung cancer cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis by targeting XIAP. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 7430–7437. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yoo, J.K.; Lee, J.M.; Kang, S.H.; Jeon, S.H.; Kim, C.M.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, N.K.; Kim, J.K. The novel microRNA hsa-miR-CHA1 regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis in human lung cancer by targeting XIAP. Lung Cancer 2019, 132, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Augeri, D.J.; Langenfeld, E.; Castle, M.; Gilleran, J.A.; Langenfeld, J. Inhibition of BMP and of TGFβ receptors downregulates expression of XIAP and TAK1 leading to lung cancer cell death. Mol. Cancer 2016, 15, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sato, Y.; Yoshino, H.; Kazama, Y.; Kashiwakura, I. Involvement of caspase‑8 in apoptosis enhancement by cotreatment with retinoic acid‑inducible gene‑I‑like receptor agonist and ionizing radiation in human non‑small cell lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 5286–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.L.; Yue, J.R.; Dong, B.R. Abnormal expression of caspase8, bcl-2 and cytochrome C in drug resistant lung cancer cell. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2005, 36, 786–788. [Google Scholar]
  49. Geng, Y.D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.Y.; Feng, X.J.; Chen, Z.L.; Jiang, L.; Shen, A.Z. Xanthatin mediates G2/M cell cycle arrest, autophagy and apoptosis via ROS/XIAP signaling in human colon cancer cells. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 2616–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bailey, K.L.; Agarwal, E.; Chowdhury, S.; Luo, J.; Brattain, M.G.; Black, J.D.; Wang, J. TGFβ/Smad3 regulates proliferation and apoptosis through IRS-1 inhibition in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, Z.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Luo, W.; Huang, C.; Chen, J. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) lacking RING domain localizes to the nuclear and promotes cancer cell anchorage-independent growth by targeting the E2F1/Cyclin E axis. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7126–7137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bao, W.; Zhu, F.; Duan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Cai, H. HtrA1 resensitizes multidrug-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting XIAP. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2015, 70, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Y.; Talmon, G.; Wang, J. MicroRNA-587 antagonizes 5-FU-induced apoptosis and confers drug resistance by regulating PPP2R1B expression in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Feng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, L.; Rong, J.; Yu, Y. Circular RNA circ0005276 promotes the proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells by interacting with FUS to transcriptionally activate XIAP. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, X.; Chen, W.; Zeng, W.; Wan, C.; Duan, S.; Jiang, S. microRNA-137 promotes apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via the regulation of XIAP. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 116, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pang, Y.; Mao, H.; Shen, L.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, R.; Liu, P. MiR-519d represses ovarian cancer cell proliferation and enhances cisplatin-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro by targeting XIAP. Onco Targets Ther. 2014, 7, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. Sun, L.; Zhai, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S. MicroRNA-149 suppresses the proliferation and increases the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by targeting X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7328–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yi, X.P.; Han, T.; Li, Y.X.; Long, X.Y.; Li, W.Z. Simultaneous silencing of XIAP and survivin causes partial mesenchymal-epithelial transition of human pancreatic cancer cells via the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jeong, S.; Jo, M.J.; Yun, H.K.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, B.R.; Kim, J.L.; Park, S.H.; Na, Y.J.; Jeong, Y.A.; Kim, B.G.; et al. Cannabidiol promotes apoptosis via regulation of XIAP/Smac in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pazhang, Y.; Jaliani, H.Z.; Imani, M.; Dariushnejad, H. Synergism between NF-kappa B inhibitor, celastrol, and XIAP inhibitor, embelin, in an acute myeloid leukemia cell line, HL-60. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016, 12, 155. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kuijper, E.C.; Bergsma, A.J.; Pijnappel, W.W.M.P.; Aartsma-Rus, A. Opportunities and challenges for antisense oligonucleotide therapies. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2020, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dean, E.; Jodrell, D.; Connolly, K.; Danson, S.; Jolivet, J.; Durkin, J.; Morris, S.; Jowle, D.; Ward, T.; Cummings, J.; et al. Phase I trial of AEG35156 administered as a 7-day and 3-day continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced refractory cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 1660–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fulda, S. Smac Mimetics to Therapeutically Target IAP Proteins in Cancer. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 330, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Bai, L.; Smith, D.C.; Wang, S. Small-molecule SMAC mimetics as new cancer therapeutics. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 144, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Saraei, R.; Soleimani, M.; Movassaghpour Akbari, A.A.; Farshdousti Hagh, M.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Solali, S. The role of XIAP in resistance to TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in Leukemia. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 1010–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yue, C.; Li, R.H.; Chen, C.; Liu, H. Study on the Relationship Between XIAP Gene and Resistance of Taxol in Ovarian Cancer. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018, 49, 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  67. Flanagan, L.; Kehoe, J.; Fay, J.; Bacon, O.; Lindner, A.U.; Kay, E.W.; Deasy, J.; McNamara, D.A.; Prehn, J.H. High levels of X-linked Inhibitor-of-Apoptosis Protein (XIAP) are indicative of radio chemotherapy resistance in rectal cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, Y.; Wan, G.H.; Wu, Y.M.; Wang, H.S.; Wang, H.F.; Zhang, G.; Lu, L.L.; Li, Z.Q.; Chan, K.Y.; Zhou, Y.; et al. AP-1 confers resistance to anti-cancer therapy by activating XIAP. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 14124–14137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  69. Xu, L.; Fu, Y.; Li, Y.; Han, X. Cisplatin induces expression of drug resistance-related genes through c-jun N-terminal kinase pathway in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 80, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Seeger, J.M.; Brinkmann, K.; Yazdanpanah, B.; Haubert, D.; Pongratz, C.; Coutelle, O.; Krönke, M.; Kashkar, H. Elevated XIAP expression alone does not confer chemoresistance. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 1717–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lu, J.; Bai, L.; Sun, H.; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z.; McEachern, D.; Qiu, S.; Miller, R.S.; Yi, H.; Shangary, S.; Sun, Y.; et al. SM-164: A novel, bivalent Smac mimetic that induces apoptosis and tumor regression by concurrent removal of the blockade of cIAP-1/2 and XIAP. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9384–9393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Li, A.Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, G.; Sun, Y. Smac-mimetic compound SM-164 induces radiosensitization in breast cancer cells through activation of caspases and induction of apoptosis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 133, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, X.; Wang, T.; Yang, D.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; He, Z.; Chen, F.; Che, X.; Song, X. Expression of the IAP protein family acts cooperatively to predict prognosis in human bladder cancer patients. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 5, 1278–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sahoo, S.; Singh, P.; Kalha, B.; Singh, O.; Pal, R. Gonadotropin-mediated chemoresistance: Delineation of molecular pathways and targets. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Evans, M.K.; Sauer, S.J.; Nath, S.; Robinson, T.J.; Morse, M.A.; Devi, G.R. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein mediates tumor cell resistance to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Schimmer, A.D.; Dalili, S.; Batey, R.A.; Riedl, S.J. Targeting XIAP for the treatment of malignancy. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tamanini, E.; Buck, I.M.; Chessari, G.; Chiarparin, E.; Day, J.E.H.; Frederickson, M.; Griffiths-Jones, C.M.; Hearn, K.; Heightman, T.D.; Iqbal, A.; et al. Discovery of a Potent Nonpeptidomimetic, Small-Molecule Antagonist of Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 1 (cIAP1) and X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (XIAP). J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 4611–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ward, G.A.; Lewis, E.J.; Ahn, J.S.; Johnson, C.N.; Lyons, J.F.; Martins, V.; Munck, J.M.; Rich, S.J.; Smyth, T.; Thompson, N.T.; et al. ASTX660, a Novel Non-peptidomimetic Antagonist of cIAP1/2 and XIAP, Potently Induces TNFα-Dependent Apoptosis in Cancer Cell Lines and Inhibits Tumor Growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Z.; Zhao, W.; Wang, M.; Zhou, X. The role of long noncoding RNAs in gene expression regulation. In Gene Expression Profiling in Cancer; Vlachakis, D., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zheng, J.; Li, X.D.; Wang, P.; Liu, X.B.; Xue, Y.X.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.Q.; Wang, Z.H.; Liu, Y.H. CRNDE affects the malignant biological characteristics of human glioma stem cells by negatively regulating miR-186. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 25339–25355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cai, J.; Wang, D.; Bai, Z.G.; Yin, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.T. The long noncoding RNA XIAP-AS1 promotes XIAP transcription by XIAP-AS1 interacting with Sp1 in gastric cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lu, X.; Yu, Y.; Tan, S. Long non-coding XIAP-AS1 regulates cell proliferation, invasion and cell cycle in colon cancer. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, Q.; Yan, H.; Tao, S.Q.; Wang, X.N.; Mou, L.; Chen, P.; Cheng, X.W.; Wu, W.Y.; Wu, Z.S. XIAP 3′-untranslated region as a ceRNA promotes FSCN1 function in inducing the progression of breast cancer by binding endogenous miR-29a-5p. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 16784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jin, H.; Xue, L.; Mo, L.; Zhang, D.; Guo, X.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; Peng, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhong, M.; et al. Downregulation of miR-200c stabilizes XIAP mRNA and contributes to invasion and lung metastasis of bladder cancer. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2019, 13, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. AbouHaidar, M.G.; Venkataraman, S.; Golshani, A.; Liu, B.; Ahmad, T. Novel coding, translation, and gene expression of a replicating covalently closed circular RNA of 220 nt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14542–14547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, S.J.; Chen, X.; Li, C.P.; Li, X.M.; Liu, C.; Liu, B.H.; Shan, K.; Jiang, Q.; Zhao, C.; Yan, B. Identification and Characterization of Circular RNAs as a New Class of Putative Biomarkers in Diabetes Retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 6500–6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shang, J.; Chen, W.M.; Wang, Z.H.; Wei, T.N.; Chen, Z.Z.; Wu, W.B. CircPAN3 mediates drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through the miR-153-5p/miR-183-5p-XIAP axis. Exp. Hematol. 2019, 70, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 10 01493 g001
Figure 1. The structure of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) homodimer. BIR: baculoviral IAP repeat. RING: RING (Really Interesting New Gene) finger doman.
Figure 1. The structure of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) homodimer. BIR: baculoviral IAP repeat. RING: RING (Really Interesting New Gene) finger doman.
Biomolecules 10 01493 g001
Biomolecules 10 01493 g002
Figure 2. XIAP and cellular function. XIAP mainly inhibits caspases-3/7/9 through binding, which blocks the pre-apoptotic pathways. SMAC, a mitochondrial protein, blocks XIAP’s cellular functions by occupying its binding sites. XIAP switches to necroptosis by RIPK3 and mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase (MLKL), mediates autophagy by Mdm2 and p53 and regulates copper homeostasis by MURR1.
Figure 2. XIAP and cellular function. XIAP mainly inhibits caspases-3/7/9 through binding, which blocks the pre-apoptotic pathways. SMAC, a mitochondrial protein, blocks XIAP’s cellular functions by occupying its binding sites. XIAP switches to necroptosis by RIPK3 and mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase (MLKL), mediates autophagy by Mdm2 and p53 and regulates copper homeostasis by MURR1.
Biomolecules 10 01493 g002
Biomolecules 10 01493 g003
Figure 3. XIAP Signaling Pathways in Human Cancer. XIAP senses external signals through TGFβ and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) receptors. MNK activation and RPS3 (ribosomal protein S3) increase XIAP expression level. XIAP binds with TAB1, forming a XIAP-TAB1-TAB2-TAK1 complex, which further activates NF-κB and NF-κB-related downstream pathways. XIAP activates Smad signals which subsequently increases NF-κB and JNK activation, JNK activation alone can also switch on NF-κB pathway. Activated NF-κB and the FUS protein translocate into the nucleus, binding and initiating transcription of XIAP. Intranuclear XIAP binds to transcription factor Sp1 and E2F1, subsequently increasing transcription of miR-203 which further leads to MMP2 activation and invasion by inhibiting Src. Inhibition of miR-200a, stabilizing c-Myc and interacting with E2F1, XIAP facilitates anchorage-independent (AI) growth. XIAP promotes cell proliferation, viability and colony formation by blocking p62. Additionally, XIAP contributes to urothelial cell transformation through impairing p63α mRNA stability via miR-4295.
Figure 3. XIAP Signaling Pathways in Human Cancer. XIAP senses external signals through TGFβ and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) receptors. MNK activation and RPS3 (ribosomal protein S3) increase XIAP expression level. XIAP binds with TAB1, forming a XIAP-TAB1-TAB2-TAK1 complex, which further activates NF-κB and NF-κB-related downstream pathways. XIAP activates Smad signals which subsequently increases NF-κB and JNK activation, JNK activation alone can also switch on NF-κB pathway. Activated NF-κB and the FUS protein translocate into the nucleus, binding and initiating transcription of XIAP. Intranuclear XIAP binds to transcription factor Sp1 and E2F1, subsequently increasing transcription of miR-203 which further leads to MMP2 activation and invasion by inhibiting Src. Inhibition of miR-200a, stabilizing c-Myc and interacting with E2F1, XIAP facilitates anchorage-independent (AI) growth. XIAP promotes cell proliferation, viability and colony formation by blocking p62. Additionally, XIAP contributes to urothelial cell transformation through impairing p63α mRNA stability via miR-4295.
Biomolecules 10 01493 g003
Table 1. The binding substrates of each domain in XIAP.
Table 1. The binding substrates of each domain in XIAP.
DomainBinding SubstratesReference
BIR1TAB1, BIR1[10,11]
linker-BIR2Caspase-3/7, E2F1, HAX-1, SMAC[12,18,19,20]
BIR3Caspase-9, Sp1, ARTS, HAX-1, SMAC, BIR3[18,19,20,21,22]
UBAUbiquitin, UBA[9]
RINGMultiple protein substrates and plays E3 ligase activity[10,23]
Table 2. The research progression on XIAP-related drugs. Data are summarized according to U.S. National Library of Medicine (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home) in September 2020.
Table 2. The research progression on XIAP-related drugs. Data are summarized according to U.S. National Library of Medicine (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home) in September 2020.
DrugStageGroup and Reference
AEG35156/GEM640Phase1–2 complicatedAegera Therapeutics, Inc.
ASTX660Phase 1–2 recruitingAstex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ASTX727Phase 2Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
AT-406/Debio 1143Phase 1 complicatedDebiopharm International SA.
LCL-161Phase 2 complicatedNovartis Pharmaceuticals.
GDC-0152Phase 1 terminatedGenentech, Inc.
TL32711/BirinipantPhase 1–2 complicatedTetraLogic Pharmaceuticals.
HGS1029Phase 1 complicatedHuman Genome Sciences Inc.
SM-164Preclinic[71,72]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tu, H.; Costa, M. XIAP’s Profile in Human Cancer. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111493

AMA Style

Tu H, Costa M. XIAP’s Profile in Human Cancer. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tu, Huailu, and Max Costa. 2020. "XIAP’s Profile in Human Cancer" Biomolecules 10, no. 11: 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111493

APA Style

Tu, H., & Costa, M. (2020). XIAP’s Profile in Human Cancer. Biomolecules, 10(11), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop