Next Article in Journal
Genetic Alterations in the INK4a/ARF Locus: Effects on Melanoma Development and Progression
Next Article in Special Issue
Oxidative Stress in NAFLD: Role of Nutrients and Food Contaminants
Previous Article in Journal
TRPA1 Expression in Synovial Sarcoma May Support Neural Origin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/biom10101445
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolic Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocytes—Potential Applications for Diabetes and NAFLD

by
Takefumi Kimura
1,2,*,†,
Sai P. Pydi
1,†,
Jonathan Pham
1 and
Naoki Tanaka
3,4
1
Molecular Signaling Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
3
Department of Metabolic Regulation, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
4
Research Center for Social Systems, Shinshu University, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equally contribution for this work.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(10), 1445; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101445
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 7 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published: 15 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Pathology and Therapeutics in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that mediate the function of extracellular ligands. Understanding how GPCRs work at the molecular level has important therapeutic implications, as 30–40% of the drugs currently in clinical use mediate therapeutic effects by acting on GPCRs. Like many other cell types, liver function is regulated by GPCRs. More than 50 different GPCRs are predicted to be expressed in the mouse liver. However, knowledge of how GPCRs regulate liver metabolism is limited. A better understanding of the metabolic role of GPCRs in hepatocytes, the dominant constituent cells of the liver, could lead to the development of novel drugs that are clinically useful for the treatment of various metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In this review, we describe the functions of multiple GPCRs expressed in hepatocytes and their role in metabolic processes.

1. Introduction

The liver is the crucial orchestrator of metabolism. In humans, approximately 11,000 genes are actively transcribed in hepatocytes, and many of them are related to the metabolic functions of the liver [1]. The liver mediates numerous physiological functions, including protein synthesis, macronutrient metabolism, cholesterol and lipid homeostasis, endocrine control of growth signaling pathways, and drug detoxification [2,3,4,5,6]. Metabolic hormones, nutrients, and sympathetic and parasympathetic neural signals tightly regulate liver function [7,8]. Alterations in these signaling pathways lead to the dysfunction of liver metabolism and can cause insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and cancer [7,8,9]. The liver consists of hepatocytes, biliary epithelial cells, stellate cells, smooth muscle cells, vascular endothelial cells, various immune cells, and sinusoidal endothelial cells [10,11,12]. Each of these cell types possesses a unique function and collectively regulates liver function at multiple levels. Hepatocytes are the primary cell type present in the liver and account for 80% of the liver cell population [12].
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors and mediate the function of a vast number of extracellular ligands (neurotransmitters, hormones, etc.) [13,14]. Ligands-coupled GPCRs recognize and activate heterotrimeric G proteins, which comprise Gα, Gβ, and Gγ. Gα determines the functions of a G protein through the exchange of guanosine diphosphate (GDP) with guanosine triphosphate (GTP) [15]. The Gβ and Gγ subunits are separately synthesized and form a complex to function as a single functional unit [16]. Both the Gα and Gβγ subunits activate signaling molecules and trigger cellular responses. Based on their α subunit, G proteins are classified into four families: Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12/13 (Figure 1), where s and i represent stimulation and inhibition, respectively. Receptor-activated G proteins stimulate various downstream signaling pathways; for example, Gs and Gi proteins control adenylyl cyclase activity, Gq activates phospholipase Cβ, and G12/13 stimulates guanine nucleotide exchange factors for small GTPases of the Rho family [17,18]. The human genome contains about 800 different GPCR genes, which represent 3–4% of all human genes. Importantly, 30–40% of the drugs currently used in the clinic mediate their therapeutic effects via acting on GPCRs [13]. Understanding how GPCRs work at the molecular level is, therefore, of considerable therapeutic relevance.
Similar to many other cell types, hepatocyte function is regulated by GPCRs [19,20,21,22]. More than 50 different GPCRs are predicted to be expressed by mouse liver [23]. However, our knowledge about how GPCRs regulate liver function remains incomplete. In this review, we discuss the function of various GPCRs expressed in hepatocytes and their roles in various metabolic processes. The receptors mentioned in this review were selected with reference to the data quantifying the transcriptional levels of 353 GPCRs in mouse tissues described by Regard et al. [23] and GPCR-related paper data in hepatocytes reported in PubMed. For the classification of α subunit, we referred to the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology [24], including those belonging to multiple families. We focused mainly on the critical GPCR functions in hepatocyte and their role in liver metabolism.

2. Role of Gs-Coupled GPCRs in Liver Metabolism

2.1. Glucagon Receptor

The glucagon receptor (GCGR) is abundantly expressed by hepatocytes and is the most extensively studied Gs-coupled GPCR in the liver [25]. GCGR is activated by the 29 amino acid polypeptide glucagon, which is secreted by α cells of the endocrine pancreas, in particular during the fasted state or exercise [26]. The primary function of glucagon is to prevent hypoglycemia during fasting by increasing hepatic glucose production (HGP) from hepatocytes by stimulating both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis [27,28]. Activation of GCGR in hepatocytes results in increased intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, followed by activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and cAMP response element-binding (CREB) protein (Figure 2). Phosphorylated CREB (the active form of CREB) binds to CRE and increases the expression of essential gluconeogenic genes, including glucose 6-phosphatase (G6pc) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pck1) [29]. The activated GCGR also stimulates Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and activates calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMKII). This results in the translocation of FOXO1 to the nucleus that promotes the transcription of gluconeogenic genes [30]. In addition to transcriptional regulation of genes involved in glucose metabolism, GCGR activation also modulates the activity of enzymes involved in glucose metabolism via PKA-dependent phosphorylation. PKA phosphorylates phospho-fructokinase 2 (PFK-2), fructose 2,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase2), pyruvate kinase, and phosphorylase kinase. Phosphorylation of these enzymes increases HGP by increasing gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis or by inhibiting glycolysis [25,31].
Kim et al. examined the effects of GCGR agonists on insulin action and glucose homeostasis [32]. The acute GCGR agonist immediately induced a hyperglycemic state, followed by improved glucose tolerance and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Furthermore, acute GCGR agonists improved insulin tolerance in a dose-dependent manner in both lean and obese mice. Phosphorylation of hepatic AKT at Ser473 was increased in mice treated with insulin and GCGR agonists. This effect was replicated in isolated primary mouse hepatocytes, increasing AKT kinase activity. These data suggest that hepatic GCGR activation improves glucose tolerance by enhancing the action of insulin. It has also been reported that hepatic GCGR stimulation reduces lipid content, drives glycogen flux, and improves mitochondrial turnover and function [33]. This glucagon signaling pointing mechanism has high potential applications in new drugs for NAFLD/NASH.

2.2. Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor (TRHR) is a Gq-coupled receptor; however, in hepatocytes, it was shown to signal through Gs [34]. TRHR is activated by TRH released from the hypothalamus. Activation of TRHR leads to increased cAMP levels and enhanced PKA activation, causing CREB activation and increased expression of gluconeogenic genes [34]. TRHR-activated PKA also phosphorylates salt-inducible kinase 2 (SIK2) and inhibits its activity [35,36]. Decreased SIK2-dependent phosphorylation of CRE2 and CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 2 (CRTC2) enables them to enter the nucleus and interact with CREB to promote the expression of the G6pc and Pck1 genes [35,36], leading to enhanced HGP.

2.3. Beta-Adrenergic Receptor

Two catecholamines, epinephrine and norepinephrine released from the sympathetic nervous system, also regulate liver metabolism [37]. These catecholamines active Gs-coupled beta-adrenergic receptors (βARs), which are expressed in both rodent and human hepatocytes [38,39]. Two subtypes of βAR (β1AR and β2AR) are predominantly expressed in the liver, and their expression is known to increase with age [38]. βAR-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase increases hepatic glucose output and liver lipid catabolism [40,41,42]. In rat hepatocytes, activation of βARs with nonselective agonist isoproterenol increases glycogen phosphorylase activity by many folds. Similar to GCGR, activation of β2AR in hepatocytes increases the expression of Pck1, G6pc, and l-pyruvate kinase (pklr) and decreases liver glycogen levels [42]. In a recent study, it was shown that activation of βAR signaling in hepatocytes increases the activity of hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) and adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) [42,43]. ATGL is the master regulator of triglyceride content in hepatocytes and it activates Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), which can regulate expression of various lipid metabolic genes [44]. On the other hand, HSL in hepatocytes increases the activity of triglyceride hydrolase. HSL also plays a role in the hydrolysis of cholesterol esters [45]. Overall, activation of βARs in hepatocytes regulate HGP and lipid catabolism.

2.4. Prostaglandin E2 Receptor 4

The prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 (EP4) metabolic function in hepatocytes is mediated through Gs. EP4-associated protein (EPRAP) is a molecule downstream of EP4 that suppresses the inflammatory response of macrophages. [46]. In addition to macrophages, EPRAP is also expressed and detected in hepatocytes [47]. Higuchi et al. showed that Eprap-null mice fed on a high-fat sucrose diet showed significantly lower blood glucose levels compared to wild type (WT) mice when challenged with either glucose or pyruvate [47]. Furthermore, primary hepatocytes of Eprap-null mice showed reduced glucose production and reduced expression of Pck1 and G6pc genes. Lentiviral-mediated suppression of hepatic EPRAP also reduced glucose levels and glucogenic gene expression in db/db mice. In summary, the authors concluded that EPRAP regulates hypoglycemia in diabetic mice by controlling hepatic gluconeogenesis. As stated by the authors, liver-specific deletion of Eprap is necessary for further understanding the role of hepatic EPRAP in glucose metabolism.

2.5. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 2

Recently, the role of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) in bile acid-mediated hepatic lipid metabolism was clarified [48]. S1PR2-mediated signaling includes Gs, Gq, and G12/13 mechanisms. In rodent primary hepatocytes, conjugated bile acids activated S1PR2, leading to the downstream activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and AKT signaling pathways. Bile acid-mediated activation of ERK1/2 and AKT signaling pathways involves the regulation of intrahepatic glucose and lipid metabolism [49]. In primary rat hepatocytes, both insulin and bile acids similarly activated glycogen synthase activity. Infusion of taurocholate (TCA) into the chronic cholestine fistula rat activated the AKT and ERK1/2 signaling and glycogen synthase activity [50]. In addition, TCA reduced the expression of liver gluconeogenic genes, Pck1, and G6pc expression, and increased the expression of short heterodimeric partner (Shp) mRNA significantly [51]. These results suggest that TCA has an insulin-like activity to regulate hepatic glucose metabolism both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, it has been reported that S1pr2-null mice fed a high-fat diet develop fatty liver more rapidly than wild-type mice, suggesting that S1PR2 is a vital regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism [52]. Infusion of TCA into the chronic bile fistula rat or overexpression of the gene encoding S1PR2 in mouse hepatocytes upregulated hepatic sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2). Interestingly, the major genes encoding nuclear receptors/enzymes responsible for nutrient metabolism were downregulated in the livers of S1pr2-null and Sphk2-null mice. Consistently, overexpression of the gene encoding S1PR2 in primary mouse hepatocytes raised the mRNA levels of key genes associated with nutrient metabolism.

3. Role of Gi-Coupled GPCRs in Liver Metabolism

GPCRs that preferentially couple to Gi proteins inhibit the function of adenylyl cyclase and thereby decrease intracellular cAMP. In a recent study, to understand the role of hepatic Gi signaling on whole-body glucose metabolism, Dr. Wess’s group employed a chemo-genetic approach where a designer Gi-coupled receptor was selectively expressed in mouse hepatocytes (Hep-GiD). This designer receptor can be selectively activated by clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), an otherwise chemically inert compound [20]. As activation of the Gs-coupled GCGR increases HGP, it was expected that activation of Gi in the liver would have opposite effects. Interestingly, activation of Gi signaling in hepatocytes also increased HGP by activating c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) signaling [20]. Activation of Gi signaling in mouse liver impaired glucose tolerance and stimulated gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that enhanced Gi signaling in hepatocytes led to a JNK-dependent increase in the expression of G6pc (Figure 2). Similar results were obtained with the human hepatocytes. Activation of Gi signaling in the liver did not affect hepatic insulin signaling [20].

3.1. Cannabinoid Receptor 1

To validate the findings obtained in the previous section with Hep-GiD mice, the authors targeted the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), an endogenous Gi-coupled receptor expressed in hepatocytes. Acute activation of CB1 with anandamide in mice severely impaired glucose tolerance and increased glucose release from hepatocytes via enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, resulting in JNK activation and increased HGP [20]. A separate study by Dr. Kunos’s lab showed that activation of CB1 increased glycogen phosphorylase activity by 70%, suggesting that enhanced glycogenolysis is the primary source of the increased HGP [53]. CB1 also inhibited insulin signaling in hepatocytes by activating the Bip/PERK/eIF2α ER stress pathway [54,55]. Furthermore, another study showed that peripheral CB1 blockade in obese mice improved glycemic in control mice via the hepatic Sirt1/mTORC2/Akt pathway and increased fatty acid oxidation via LKB1/AMPK signaling [56].

3.2. A1 and A3 Adenosine Receptor

Another group of Gi-coupled receptors expressed in hepatocytes are the A1 and A3 adenosine receptors. Treatment of hepatocytes with the A1 receptor-selective agonist 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) stimulates gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis [57]. This receptor also regulates lipid metabolism in hepatocytes by increasing triglyceride synthesis by enhancing the expression levels of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARg), key regulators of genes involved in lipogenesis (Fas, Acc, Acl, stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1, and l-α-glycerophosphate acyltransferase) [58]. Similar to the A1 receptor, activation of the A3 receptor in hepatocytes increases HGP by enhancing gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis [59,60].

3.3. GPR109A

GPR109A (HCA2, hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2) is a Gi-coupled receptor, and activation of GPR109A in hepatocytes by niacin decreases intracellular cAMP levels. Agonist stimulation of GPR109A in mouse hepatocytes decreases plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol by reducing the expression of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding cassette transporter A1 (Abca1) and reduces the efflux of cholesterol to HDL [61,62]. Activation of either Gs or Gi signaling pathways in hepatocytes increases HGP. However, both signaling molecules use different signaling pathways. Interestingly, the A1 adenosine receptor and GPR109A Gi-coupled receptors also regulate lipid metabolism.

3.4. C-C Chemokine Receptor Types 2 and 5

The expression of Gi-coupled receptors C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) is increased in the livers of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) [63]. Ambate et al. tested whether inhibition of CCR2/5-related signaling could inhibit ALD progression [63]. The authors used cenicriviroc (CVC), a dual inhibitor of CCR2/5, to inhibit CCR2/5 signaling in a mouse model of ALD, which reduced liver damage and steatosis. In vitro, CVC reduced expression of fatty acid synthase (Fasn) and adipose differentiation-related protein (Adrp) and increased the expression of acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 (Acox-1), proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator alpha (Pgc1α), and uncoupling protein two. These data suggested possible mechanisms for attenuated hepatocyte steatosis. Collectively, this study showed an association between alcohol-induced steatohepatitis, liver damage, and CCR2/5, indicating that inhibition of CCR2 and CCR5 may be an effective treatment for ALD.

3.5. Purinergic Receptor P2Y, G Protein-Coupled, 13

In cultured hepatocytes, activation of the Gi-coupled receptor, purinergic receptor P2Y13 (P2Y13), was reported to be essential for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) uptake [64]. The primary atheroprotective function of HDL is to promote “reverse cholesterol transport” (RCT). HDL mediates the efflux and transport of cholesterol from peripheral cells and subsequent metabolism and traffic to the liver for biliary excretion. Recently, P2Y13 has been shown to be a new target for regulating RCT [65]. This is a very relevant finding for the link between the liver and atherosclerosis, and the therapeutic application of these findings is expected.

3.6. Smoothened Receptor

The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway regulates the fate of hepatic progenitor cells and liver development [66]. Components of Hh signaling include the Gi- or G12/13-coupled receptor, smoothened (SMO) [67]. Activation of Hh has been observed in patients with NAFLD, but the function of hepatic Hh signaling in the pathogenesis of NAFLD was previously unknown. A recent publication examined the effects and mechanisms of hepatic Hh signaling in high fat diet (HFD)-induced NAFLD using genetic and pharmacological approaches [67]. Treatment of HFD-fed WT mice with Smo inhibitors (GDC-0449 and LED225) significantly reduced the number of activated macrophages and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The SMO inhibitors were noted to have variable effects on hepatic fat accumulation. Hepatocyte-specific deletion of Smo reduced macrophage activation and inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines but did not significantly alter fat accumulation in the liver. This paper concluded that hepatocyte Hh signaling played an important role in the progression of NAFLD by promoting hepatic inflammation via osteopontin-mediated macrophage activation, rather than a direct effect on the fat deposition. Selective inhibition of hepatocyte Hh signaling in patients with NAFLD might inhibit the progression from simple fatty liver to NASH.

4. Role of Gq-Coupled GPCRs in Liver Metabolism

Stimulation of Gq signaling leads to the activation of phospholipase Cβ, followed by an increase in intracellular levels of inositol trisphosphate, diacylglycerol, and calcium (Figure 1). Further downstream effectors of the signaling pathway are dependent on the receptor and cell type. To understand the role of hepatic Gq signaling on glucose homeostasis, Dr. Wess’s group expressed a Gq coupled, CNO-sensitive designer receptor selectively in mouse hepatocytes (Hep-GqD) [21]. Acute activation of this receptor with CNO increased blood glucose levels in a concentration-dependent manner. Hep-GqD mice showed impaired glucose and pyruvate tolerance. Impairments were predominately due to an increase in HGP [20]. Mechanistic studies confirmed an increase in the expression of various genes involved in gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. In particular, mRNA levels of Pck1, a rate-limiting enzyme of gluconeogenesis, were significantly increased (Figure 2). Similarly, the expression levels of genes involved in fatty acid syntheses such as Acyl, Acc, and Fas were also upregulated [20]. These data indicate that Gq signaling in hepatocytes plays a crucial role in glucose and lipid handling.

4.1. Vasopressin and Oxytocin Receptor

Hepatocytes express various Gq-coupled receptors, including arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A) and oxytocin (OT) [68,69,70,71]. The AVPR1A (endogenous agonist: arginine-vasopressin, AVP) is expressed predominantly in mammalian hepatocytes. Activation of AVPR1A in hepatocytes initiates glycogenolysis by phosphorylating glycogen phosphorylase (Pygl). In rat hepatocytes, activation of AVPR1A leads to increased glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis [72,73]. Acute injection of AVP into experimental animals increases blood glucose levels, indicating that AVPR1A stimulates HGP [74,75,76].
Chronic activation of oxytocin receptors in lean mice via long-term treatment with oxytocin increased the expression of gluconeogenic genes such as G6pc, Fbp1, and Pck1. These mice also showed decreased liver glycogen levels and increased expression of hepatic Pygl [70,71,77]. In agreement with the in vivo data, the treatment of rat hepatocytes with oxytocin increased glycogen phosphorylase activity and decreased glycogen synthase activity [71]. Collectively, these data suggest that oxytocin increases net hepatic glucose oxidation.

4.2. Purinergic Receptor

Purinergic receptor P2Y receptors are activated by various extracellular nucleotides and nucleotide sugars. The presence of the Gq-coupled P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors have been detected in hepatocytes [78]. Studies with human hepatocytes suggest that P2Y2 and P2Y4 modulate glycogen metabolism by reducing glycogen synthesis and promoting glycogenolysis [78,79]. Studies on rat hepatocytes showed that activation of P2Y1 stimulates glycogen phosphorylase [78].

4.3. Angiotensin II Type I Receptor

The Gq-coupled angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is known to regulate cardiovascular function [80]. However, AT1R stimulation can also lead to hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrosis via phosphorylation of janus kinase 2 (JAK2) as well as activation of RhoA and Rho-associated kinase 1 (ROCK1). In primary rat hepatocytes, the angiotensin II analog [Sar1, Ile4, Ile8]-angiotensin II (SII Ang II) showed positive effects on insulin receptor signaling and glucose metabolism [81]. Long-term pretreatment with SII Ang II enhanced insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis and promoted insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt and GSK3a/b, but not of FOXO1 [81]. Furthermore, the effects of SII Ang II on insulin-stimulated signaling and glycogen synthesis were dependent on the activity of Src and Gaq, since inhibitors of these proteins abolished the beneficial metabolic effects of SII Ang II [81].

4.4. Free Fatty Acid Receptor 4 and GPR40

Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4, GPR120) is a known Gq-coupled receptor and has been suggested as a target of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) [82]. Kang et al. evaluated the functional role of FFA4 in hepatic steatosis using an in vitro model of liver X receptor (LXR)-mediated hepatic steatosis [82]. The expression of FFA4 in Hep3B and HepG2 human hepatocytes was first confirmed. T0901317 (a specific LXR activator) induced lipid accumulation and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, one of the n-3 PUFAs) inhibited lipid accumulation. This DHA-induced inhibition was blocked by small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated FFA4 knockdown or treatment with FFA4 antagonist, AH7614. SREBP-1c (a vital transcription factor for adipogenesis) expression was induced by treatment with T0901317, and DHA inhibited SREBP-1c at the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, DHA inhibited T0901317-induced lipid accumulation in primary hepatocytes of WT mice, but not in primary hepatocytes of FFA4-deficient mice. These results suggest that FFA4, Gq/11 protein, and SREBP-1c suppression are sequentially involved in liver fat deposition.
On the other hand, there are conflicting views on the receptors that DHA operates on. The various bioactivities of n-3 PUFAs depend not only on the FFA4, but also on their agonistic effects on GPR40 (free fatty acid receptor 1, FFA1). On et al. evaluated whether the anti-lipogenic effects of DHA in hepatocytes were mediated through FFA4 or GPR40 using specific agonists (compound A for FFA4 and AMG-1638 for GPR40), hepatocytes from FFA4 knockout (KO) mice, and a GPR40 selective antagonist (GW1100) [83]. Compound A did not reduce SREBP-1 and FAS protein expression in hepatocytes exposed to T0901317 or high glucose with insulin. Furthermore, DHA reduced the expression of lipogenic enzymes in FFA4-null hepatocytes. On the contrary, AMG-1638 decreased SREBP-1 and stearoyl-coenzyme A denaturase 1 (SCD-1) protein levels. Moreover, GW1100, a GPR40 antagonist, reversed the anti-lipogenic effects of DHA. Based on these results, the authors concluded that DHA reduced the expression of SREBP-1-mediated lipid-metabolizing enzymes via GPR40 but not FFA4.
The protective effect of n-3 PUFAs on NAFLD patients has been reported [84,85]. Tanaka et al. tested the efficacy of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), one of the major members of the n-3 PUFAs, against NASH [85]. In this study, 23 patients with biopsy-proven NASH were treated with high-purity EPA (2700 mg/d) for 12 months, and their efficacy was assessed by biochemical parameters and liver histological examination. After 12 months, serum alanine aminotransferase levels, serum-free fatty acids, plasma soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor levels, and serum ferritin and thioredoxin levels, which may reflect hepatic oxidative stress, were significantly decreased. Seven of the 23 patients underwent post-treatment liver biopsies, and six patients had liver steatosis and fibrosis. Liver improvement in hepatocyte ballooning and lobular inflammation was observed. Although this was a small-scale study and the authors did not conclude that EPA is a specific treatment for NASH, this study suggested a positive impact of EPA on NASH pathogenesis due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. There was a recent review of clinical trials conducted on n-3 PUFAs and NAFLD/NASH [84]. Very interestingly, 13 of 17 published studies reported that n-3 PUFAs supplementation decreased liver fat, liver enzymes, or markers of inflammation; four studies suggested a reduction in ballooning and two studies suggested a reduction in fibrosis. Results also indicated that DHA was more effective than EPA in the treatment of NAFLD. Caloric restriction and supplementation with n-3 PUFAs were additive in decreasing hepatic steatosis.

4.5. Prostaglandin E Receptor 1

Prostaglandin E receptor 1 (EP1) is also a Gq-coupled receptor, with a few metabolic studies on hepatocytes. Prostaglandin E has been reported both to stimulate glycogen-phosphorylase activity (glycogenolytic effect) and to inhibit the glucagon-stimulated glycogen-phosphorylase activity (anti-glycogenolytic effect) in rat hepatocytes [86]. This conflicting event has been reported to be caused via EP1 and prostaglandin E receptor 3 (EP3, Gi-coupled receptor), respectively [86]. However, there are still many unresolved aspects of these signal analyses. The functions of EP1/3 receptors in liver metabolism require further investigation.

4.6. Serotonin Receptor

In addition to the role as a neurotransmitter in the regulation of central nervous system function, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) has metabolic functions in the periphery [87]. The action of 5-HT is dependent on the type of 5-HT receptors (types 1–7 5-HT receptors). Serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT2A) and serotonin receptor 2B (5-HT2B) are distributed in the liver [88]. Hepatic synthetic 5-HT acting on the serotonin receptor 2 (5-HT2) has been shown to regulate lipid-induced lipid over synthesis [88]. The combination of antagonists of both 5-HT synthesis and 5-HT2 significantly inhibited hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia in diabetic mice. Thus, activation of the 5-HT system in hepatocytes plays a vital role in the induction of diabetes-related hepatic dysfunction and may be a potential therapeutic target.

5. Role of G12/13 Signaling in Liver Metabolism

5.1. Gα12

The G12/13 family comprises two members: Gα12 and Gα13. Kim et al. examined the regulatory role of G protein α12 (Gα12) on hepatic lipid metabolism and systemic energy expenditure [89]. Hepatic levels of Gα12 were increased by fasting in the livers of mice. The fasting-induced hepatic fat accumulation was significantly enhanced in Gna12-KO mice. The cDNA microarray analysis of Gna12-KO mouse livers demonstrated that the Gα12 signaling pathway regulates SIRT1 and PPARα, both of which are involved in mitochondrial respiration. SIRT1 was poorly induced in the livers of Gna12-KO mice during fasting, but Gα12 overexpression in lentivirus-mediated hepatocytes reversed this expression. Gα12 stabilized the SIRT1 protein by inducing transcription of ubiquitin-specific peptidase 22 (USP22) via increased HIF-1a. Gna12-KO mice fed a high-fat diet were more prone to diet-induced hepatic steatosis and obesity due to reduced energy expenditure. Furthermore, as an impactful result, liver biopsies of NAFLD patients had significantly reduced Gα12 levels. These results indicate that Gα12 regulates SIRT1-dependent mitochondrial respiration via HIF-1α-dependent USP22 induction, suggesting that Ga12 is an upstream molecule that contributes to the regulation of mitochondrial energy expenditure.
Kim et al. further argued that the adenosine receptor, which was also referred to above, is relevant to Gα12 signaling [89]. In embryonic fibroblasts, treatment of WT mice-derived cells with an agonist for adenosine significantly increased SIRT1 levels, whereas SIRT levels were lower in Gα12-KO mice-derived cells. Similar results were obtained using AML12 cells, stably expressing shRNA for Gα12. In addition, as evidence of hepatocyte involvement, primary hepatocytes exposed to adenosine receptor agonists showed a significant increase in SIRT1 and USP22. In addition, serum adenosine levels in mice were significantly increased by fasting. No change was observed in liver homogenates. Taken together, increased circulating adenosine concentrations, activation of adenosine receptors, and increased Gα12 may amplify SIRT1 induction and maintain systemic energy homeostasis.

5.2. Gα13

Kim et al. also explored differences in the number of proteins regulated by Gα13 in the liver using a proteomics-based approach [90]. Among the secreted proteins enriched in the liver, they identified inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 1 (ITIH1) as a critical molecule associated with metabolic abnormalities. ITIH1 is a hyaluronan-binding protein that is predominantly expressed in hepatocytes under diabetic conditions. ITIH1 levels were reduced in patients with liver fibrosis, and circulating ITIH1 mRNA levels were increased in rats with D-galactosamine-induced liver injury. Hepatic Gα13 levels were reduced under diabetic conditions, in which ITIH1 is a major driver of cross talk between organs regulated by the liver. Hepatic Gα13 increased ITIH1 overexpression via O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine transferase catalyzed O-GlcNAcylation. Overexpressed ITIH1 in the absence of hepatic Gα13 was secreted into the circulation and bound directly to adipose tissue and skeletal muscle hyaluronan, stabilizing their respective integrity and exacerbating peripheral insulin resistance. These results indicate that a liver Gα13-mediated signaling cascade is important for systemic glucose metabolism.

6. GPCR Signaling in Relation to Metformin, PPARγ Agonist, and Statins

The relationship between GPCR signaling and drugs already widely used for diabetes and dyslipidemia, such as metformin, PPARγ agonist, and statins, should also be discussed. Although these drugs are not direct GPCR stimulators, indirect effects on GPCR signaling can be occurring.
We recently reported that activation of Gq-coupled receptors enhanced AMPK-mediated glucose uptake in muscle [91]. Whether there is a synergistic effect between hepatic AMPK activation by metformin and Gq receptor activation in the muscle (and other tissues, including liver) is a subject to be examined. Additionally, Paschoal et al. showed that GPR120 and PPARγ agonists functionally interact and markedly improve insulin resistance by using adipocytes and macrophages [92]. Also, chronic cholesterol depletion by statins in HEK cells has been shown to switch the serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A) endocytosis pathway from clathrin-mediated endocytosis to caveolin-mediated endocytosis [93]. Clarifying the interactions of these agents with GPCRs in the liver is an interesting topic for future research.

7. Closing Remarks

In addition to the receptors described Below (Table 1), many other GPCRs are present in hepatocytes, including many orphan receptors, but their potential roles in regulating hepatic glucose fluxes remain to be explored. An improved understanding of the metabolic functions of hepatocyte GPCRs may lead to the development of novel drugs that could prove clinically useful for the treatment of various metabolic disorders, including T2D, NAFLD, and NASH.

Author Contributions

S.P.P. and T.K. contributed equally to the conception, writing, reviewing, and editing of this manuscript. J.P. and N.T. supervised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

T.K. was supported by JSPS research fellowship for Japanese biomedical and behavioral researchers at NIH (T.K., Number 71704).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Jurgen Wess for his mentorship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest with this paper.

References

  1. Ramskold, D.; Wang, E.T.; Burge, C.B.; Sandberg, R. An abundance of ubiquitously expressed genes revealed by tissue transcriptome sequence data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, e1000598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rui, L. Energy metabolism in the liver. Compr. Physiol. 2014, 4, 177–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hers, H.G. The control of glycogen metabolism in the liver. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1976, 45, 167–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rines, A.K.; Sharabi, K.; Tavares, C.D.; Puigserver, P. Targeting hepatic glucose metabolism in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 786–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Postic, C.; Dentin, R.; Girard, J. Role of the liver in the control of carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis. Diabetes Metab. 2004, 30, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grant, D.M. Detoxification pathways in the liver. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 1991, 14, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trefts, E.; Gannon, M.; Wasserman, D.H. The liver. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R1147–R1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gordillo, M.; Evans, T.; Gouon-Evans, V. Orchestrating liver development. Development 2015, 142, 2094–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schuppan, D.; Afdhal, N.H. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2008, 371, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jenne, C.N.; Kubes, P. Immune surveillance by the liver. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 996–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ding, C.; Li, Y.; Guo, F.; Jiang, Y.; Ying, W.; Li, D.; Yang, D.; Xia, X.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Y.; et al. A Cell-type-resolved Liver Proteome. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2016, 15, 3190–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kmiec, Z. Cooperation of liver cells in health and disease. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 2001, 161, III–XIII, 1–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lagerstrom, M.C.; Schioth, H.B. Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lefkowitz, R.J. Historical review: A brief history and personal retrospective of seven-transmembrane receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 25, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Denis, C.; Sauliere, A.; Galandrin, S.; Senard, J.M.; Gales, C. Probing heterotrimeric G protein activation: Applications to biased ligands. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Syrovatkina, V.; Alegre, K.O.; Dey, R.; Huang, X.Y. Regulation, Signaling, and Physiological Functions of G-Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3850–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tesmer, J.J. The quest to understand heterotrimeric G protein signaling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 650–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jastrzebska, B. GPCR: G protein complexes--the fundamental signaling assembly. Amino Acids 2013, 45, 1303–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Peng, W.T.; Sun, W.Y.; Li, X.R.; Sun, J.C.; Du, J.J.; Wei, W. Emerging Roles of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rossi, M.; Zhu, L.; McMillin, S.M.; Pydi, S.P.; Jain, S.; Wang, L.; Cui, Y.; Lee, R.J.; Cohen, A.H.; Kaneto, H.; et al. Hepatic Gi signaling regulates whole-body glucose homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 746–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, J.H.; Jain, S.; McMillin, S.M.; Cui, Y.; Gautam, D.; Sakamoto, W.; Lu, H.; Jou, W.; McGuinness, O.P.; Gavrilova, O.; et al. A novel experimental strategy to assess the metabolic effects of selective activation of a G(q)-coupled receptor in hepatocytes in vivo. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 3539–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Husted, A.S.; Trauelsen, M.; Rudenko, O.; Hjorth, S.A.; Schwartz, T.W. GPCR-Mediated Signaling of Metabolites. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 777–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Regard, J.B.; Sato, I.T.; Coughlin, S.R. Anatomical profiling of G protein-coupled receptor expression. Cell 2008, 135, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. UPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology. Available online: https://www.guidetopharmacology.org/GRAC/FamilyDisplayForward?familyId=694 (accessed on 14 September 2020).
  25. Janah, L.; Kjeldsen, S.; Galsgaard, K.D.; Winther-Sorensen, M.; Stojanovska, E.; Pedersen, J.; Knop, F.K.; Holst, J.J.; Wewer Albrechtsen, N.J. Glucagon Receptor Signaling and Glucagon Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wewer Albrechtsen, N.J.; Pedersen, J.; Galsgaard, K.D.; Winther-Sorensen, M.; Suppli, M.P.; Janah, L.; Gromada, J.; Vilstrup, H.; Knop, F.K.; Holst, J.J. The Liver-alpha-Cell Axis and Type 2 Diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ramnanan, C.J.; Edgerton, D.S.; Kraft, G.; Cherrington, A.D. Physiologic action of glucagon on liver glucose metabolism. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2011, 13 (Suppl. 1), 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Felig, P.; Wahren, J.; Sherwin, R.; Hendler, R. Insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin in normal physiology and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1976, 25, 1091–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berglund, E.D.; Lee-Young, R.S.; Lustig, D.G.; Lynes, S.E.; Donahue, E.P.; Camacho, R.C.; Meredith, M.E.; Magnuson, M.A.; Charron, M.J.; Wasserman, D.H. Hepatic energy state is regulated by glucagon receptor signaling in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2412–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ozcan, L.; Wong, C.C.; Li, G.; Xu, T.; Pajvani, U.; Park, S.K.; Wronska, A.; Chen, B.X.; Marks, A.R.; Fukamizu, A.; et al. Calcium signaling through CaMKII regulates hepatic glucose production in fasting and obesity. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Galsgaard, K.D.; Pedersen, J.; Knop, F.K.; Holst, J.J.; Wewer Albrechtsen, N.J. Glucagon Receptor Signaling and Lipid Metabolism. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, T.; Holleman, C.L.; Nason, S.; Arble, D.M.; Ottaway, N.; Chabenne, J.; Loyd, C.; Kim, J.A.; Sandoval, D.; Drucker, D.J.; et al. Hepatic Glucagon Receptor Signaling Enhances Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Disposal in Rodents. Diabetes 2018, 67, 2157–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Boland, M.L.; Laker, R.C.; Mather, K.; Nawrocki, A.; Oldham, S.; Boland, B.B.; Lewis, H.; Conway, J.; Naylor, J.; Guionaud, S.; et al. Resolution of NASH and hepatic fibrosis by the GLP-1R/GcgR dual-agonist Cotadutide via modulating mitochondrial function and lipogenesis. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, L.; Song, Y.; Ma, S.; Yu, C.; Zhao, J.; Xu, C.; Gao, L. Thyroid stimulating hormone increases hepatic gluconeogenesis via CRTC2. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2017, 446, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, X.; Yang, S.; Chen, J.; Su, Z. Unraveling the Regulation of Hepatic Gluconeogenesis. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Suh, J.H.; Sieglaff, D.H.; Zhang, A.; Xia, X.; Cvoro, A.; Winnier, G.E.; Webb, P. SIRT1 is a direct coactivator of thyroid hormone receptor beta1 with gene-specific actions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dax, E.M.; Partilla, J.S.; Pineyro, M.A.; Gregerman, R.I. Beta-adrenergic receptors, glucagon receptors, and their relationship to adenylate cyclase in rat liver during aging. Endocrinology 1987, 120, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katz, M.S.; McNair, C.L.; Hymer, T.K.; Boland, S.R. Emergence of beta adrenergic-responsive hepatic glycogenolysis in male rats during post-maturational aging. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1987, 147, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arner, P.; Engfeldt, P.; Hellstrom, L.; Lonnqvist, F.; Wahrenberg, H.; Sonnenfeld, T.; Bronnegard, M. Beta-adrenoreceptor subtype expression in human liver. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990, 71, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aggerbeck, M.; Ferry, N.; Zafrani, E.S.; Billon, M.C.; Barouki, R.; Hanoune, J. Adrenergic regulation of glycogenolysis in rat liver after cholestasis. Modulation of the balance between alpha 1 and beta 2 receptors. J. Clin. Investig. 1983, 71, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ghosh, P.M.; Shu, Z.J.; Zhu, B.; Lu, Z.; Ikeno, Y.; Barnes, J.L.; Yeh, C.K.; Zhang, B.X.; Katz, M.S.; Kamat, A. Role of beta-adrenergic receptors in regulation of hepatic fat accumulation during aging. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 213, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Erraji-Benchekroun, L.; Couton, D.; Postic, C.; Borde, I.; Gaston, J.; Guillet, J.G.; Andre, C. Overexpression of beta2-adrenergic receptors in mouse liver alters the expression of gluconeogenic and glycolytic enzymes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 288, E715–E722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ong, K.T.; Mashek, M.T.; Bu, S.Y.; Greenberg, A.S.; Mashek, D.G. Adipose triglyceride lipase is a major hepatic lipase that regulates triacylglycerol turnover and fatty acid signaling and partitioning. Hepatology 2011, 53, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Khan, S.A.; Sathyanarayan, A.; Mashek, M.T.; Ong, K.T.; Wollaston-Hayden, E.E.; Mashek, D.G. ATGL-catalyzed lipolysis regulates SIRT1 to control PGC-1alpha/PPAR-alpha signaling. Diabetes 2015, 64, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Reid, B.N.; Ables, G.P.; Otlivanchik, O.A.; Schoiswohl, G.; Zechner, R.; Blaner, W.S.; Goldberg, I.J.; Schwabe, R.F.; Chua, S.C., Jr.; Huang, L.S. Hepatic overexpression of hormone-sensitive lipase and adipose triglyceride lipase promotes fatty acid oxidation, stimulates direct release of free fatty acids, and ameliorates steatosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 13087–13099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yasui, M.; Tamura, Y.; Minami, M.; Higuchi, S.; Fujikawa, R.; Ikedo, T.; Nagata, M.; Arai, H.; Murayama, T.; Yokode, M. The Prostaglandin E2 Receptor EP4 Regulates Obesity-Related Inflammation and Insulin Sensitivity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Higuchi, S.; Fujikawa, R.; Nakatsuji, M.; Yasui, M.; Ikedo, T.; Nagata, M.; Mishima, K.; Irie, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Yokode, M.; et al. EP4 receptor-associated protein regulates gluconeogenesis in the liver and is associated with hyperglycemia in diabetic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 316, E410–E417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kwong, E.; Li, Y.; Hylemon, P.B.; Zhou, H. Bile acids and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in hepatic lipid metabolism. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2015, 5, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Studer, E.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, R.; Wang, Y.; Takabe, K.; Nagahashi, M.; Pandak, W.M.; Dent, P.; Spiegel, S.; Shi, R.; et al. Conjugated bile acids activate the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in primary rodent hepatocytes. Hepatology 2012, 55, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fang, Y.; Studer, E.; Mitchell, C.; Grant, S.; Pandak, W.M.; Hylemon, P.B.; Dent, P. Conjugated bile acids regulate hepatocyte glycogen synthase activity in vitro and in vivo via Galphai signaling. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007, 71, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, R.; Cronk, Z.X.; Zha, W.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.; Fang, Y.; Studer, E.; Zhou, H.; Pandak, W.M.; Dent, P.; et al. Bile acids regulate hepatic gluconeogenic genes and farnesoid X receptor via G(alpha)i-protein-coupled receptors and the AKT pathway. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 2234–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nagahashi, M.; Takabe, K.; Liu, R.; Peng, K.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hait, N.C.; Wang, X.; Allegood, J.C.; Yamada, A.; et al. Conjugated bile acid-activated S1P receptor 2 is a key regulator of sphingosine kinase 2 and hepatic gene expression. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1216–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, J.; Zhou, L.; Xiong, K.; Godlewski, G.; Mukhopadhyay, B.; Tam, J.; Yin, S.; Gao, P.; Shan, X.; Pickel, J.; et al. Hepatic cannabinoid receptor-1 mediates diet-induced insulin resistance via inhibition of insulin signaling and clearance in mice. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1218–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Bazwinsky-Wutschke, I.; Zipprich, A.; Dehghani, F. Endocannabinoid System in Hepatic Glucose Metabolism, Fatty Liver Disease, and Cirrhosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Gonzalez-Mariscal, I.; Krzysik-Walker, S.M.; Doyle, M.E.; Liu, Q.R.; Cimbro, R.; Santa-Cruz Calvo, S.; Ghosh, S.; Ciesla, L.; Moaddel, R.; Carlson, O.D.; et al. Human CB1 Receptor Isoforms, present in Hepatocytes and beta-cells, are Involved in Regulating Metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Liu, J.; Godlewski, G.; Jourdan, T.; Liu, Z.; Cinar, R.; Xiong, K.; Kunos, G. Cannabinoid-1 Receptor Antagonism Improves Glycemic Control and Increases Energy Expenditure Through Sirtuin-1/Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 and 5’Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling. Hepatology 2019, 69, 1535–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Buxton, D.B.; Fisher, R.A.; Robertson, S.M.; Olson, M.S. Stimulation of glycogenolysis and vasoconstriction by adenosine and adenosine analogues in the perfused rat liver. Biochem. J. 1987, 248, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Gonzalez-Benitez, E.; Guinzberg, R.; Diaz-Cruz, A.; Pina, E. Regulation of glycogen metabolism in hepatocytes through adenosine receptors. Role of Ca2+ and cAMP. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 437, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dixon, A.K.; Gubitz, A.K.; Sirinathsinghji, D.J.; Richardson, P.J.; Freeman, T.C. Tissue distribution of adenosine receptor mRNAs in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 118, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Salvatore, C.A.; Jacobson, M.A.; Taylor, H.E.; Linden, J.; Johnson, R.G. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human A3 adenosine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 10365–10369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Li, X.; Millar, J.S.; Brownell, N.; Briand, F.; Rader, D.J. Modulation of HDL metabolism by the niacin receptor GPR109A in mouse hepatocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 1450–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Koupenova, M.; Ravid, K. Adenosine, adenosine receptors and their role in glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. J. Cell Physiol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ambade, A.; Lowe, P.; Kodys, K.; Catalano, D.; Gyongyosi, B.; Cho, Y.; Iracheta-Vellve, A.; Adejumo, A.; Saha, B.; Calenda, C.; et al. Pharmacological Inhibition of CCR2/5 Signaling Prevents and Reverses Alcohol-Induced Liver Damage, Steatosis, and Inflammation in Mice. Hepatology 2019, 69, 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jacquet, S.; Malaval, C.; Martinez, L.O.; Sak, K.; Rolland, C.; Perez, C.; Nauze, M.; Champagne, E.; Terce, F.; Gachet, C.; et al. The nucleotide receptor P2Y13 is a key regulator of hepatic high-density lipoprotein (HDL) endocytosis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2508–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fabre, A.C.; Malaval, C.; Ben Addi, A.; Verdier, C.; Pons, V.; Serhan, N.; Lichtenstein, L.; Combes, G.; Huby, T.; Briand, F.; et al. P2Y13 receptor is critical for reverse cholesterol transport. Hepatology 2010, 52, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Omenetti, A.; Choi, S.; Michelotti, G.; Diehl, A.M. Hedgehog signaling in the liver. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kwon, H.; Song, K.; Han, C.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Dash, S.; Lim, K.; Wu, T. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling ameliorates hepatic inflammation in mice with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2016, 63, 1155–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Howl, J.; Ismail, T.; Strain, A.J.; Kirk, C.J.; Anderson, D.; Wheatley, M. Characterization of the human liver vasopressin receptor. Profound differences between human and rat vasopressin-receptor-mediated responses suggest only a minor role for vasopressin in regulating human hepatic function. Biochem. J. 1991, 276 Pt 1, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Liu, X.; Luo, G.; Jiang, J.; Ma, T.; Lin, X.; Jiang, L.; Cheng, J.; Tao, R. Signaling through hepatocyte vasopressin receptor 1 protects mouse liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 69276–69290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Altirriba, J.; Poher, A.L.; Caillon, A.; Arsenijevic, D.; Veyrat-Durebex, C.; Lyautey, J.; Dulloo, A.; Rohner-Jeanrenaud, F. Divergent effects of oxytocin treatment of obese diabetic mice on adiposity and diabetes. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 4189–4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Arino, J.; Bosch, F.; Gomez-Foix, A.M.; Guinovart, J.J. Oxytocin inactivates and phosphorylates rat hepatocyte glycogen synthase. Biochem. J. 1989, 261, 827–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Combettes, L.; Tran, D.; Tordjmann, T.; Laurent, M.; Berthon, B.; Claret, M. Ca(2+)-mobilizing hormones induce sequentially ordered Ca2+ signals in multicellular systems of rat hepatocytes. Biochem. J. 1994, 304 Pt 2, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Keppens, S.; de Wulf, H. The activation of liver glycogen phosphorylase by vasopressin. FEBS Lett. 1975, 51, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Nakamura, K.; Velho, G.; Bouby, N. Vasopressin and metabolic disorders: Translation from experimental models to clinical use. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 282, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zelena, D.; Mergl, Z.; Makara, G.B. The role of vasopressin in diabetes mellitus-induced hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis activation: Studies in Brattleboro rats. Brain Res. Bull. 2006, 69, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sharma, R.J.; Rodrigues, L.M.; Whitton, P.D.; Hems, D.A. Control mechanisms in the acceleration of hepatic glycogen degradation during hypoxia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1980, 630, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ding, C.; Leow, M.K.; Magkos, F. Oxytocin in metabolic homeostasis: Implications for obesity and diabetes management. Obes. Rev. 2019, 20, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Dixon, C.J.; Hall, J.F.; Webb, T.E.; Boarder, M.R. Regulation of rat hepatocyte function by P2Y receptors: Focus on control of glycogen phosphorylase and cyclic AMP by 2-methylthioadenosine 5’-diphosphate. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 311, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Tackett, B.C.; Sun, H.; Mei, Y.; Maynard, J.P.; Cheruvu, S.; Mani, A.; Hernandez-Garcia, A.; Vigneswaran, N.; Karpen, S.J.; Thevananther, S. P2Y2 purinergic receptor activation is essential for efficient hepatocyte proliferation in response to partial hepatectomy. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2014, 307, G1073–G1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dasgupta, C.; Zhang, L. Angiotensin II receptors and drug discovery in cardiovascular disease. Drug Discov. Today 2011, 16, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sanni, S.J.; Lyngso, C.; Gammeltoft, S.; Hansen, J.L. [Sar1, Ile4, Ile8]-angiotensin II Potentiates Insulin Receptor Signalling and Glycogen Synthesis in Hepatocytes. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018, 122, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Kang, S.; Huang, J.; Lee, B.K.; Jung, Y.S.; Im, E.; Koh, J.M.; Im, D.S. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids protect human hepatoma cells from developing steatosis through FFA4 (GPR120). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2018, 1863, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. On, S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Park, J.; Kang, K.W. Involvement of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 40 in the Inhibitory Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid on SREBP1-Mediated Lipogenic Enzyme Expression in Primary Hepatocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kelley, N.S. Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Long-Chain n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Humans. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2016, 14, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tanaka, N.; Sano, K.; Horiuchi, A.; Tanaka, E.; Kiyosawa, K.; Aoyama, T. Highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid treatment improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008, 42, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Puschel, G.P.; Kirchner, C.; Schroder, A.; Jungermann, K. Glycogenolytic and antiglycogenolytic prostaglandin E2 actions in rat hepatocytes are mediated via different signalling pathways. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 218, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Berger, M.; Gray, J.A.; Roth, B.L. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu. Rev. Med. 2009, 60, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Fu, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, G.; Tong, X.; Zhang, H.; Ding, J.; Ma, Y.; Cheng, R.; Hou, S.; An, S.; et al. Crucial Roles of 5-HT and 5-HT2 Receptor in Diabetes-Related Lipid Accumulation and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Generation in Hepatocytes. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 48, 2409–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kim, T.H.; Yang, Y.M.; Han, C.Y.; Koo, J.H.; Oh, H.; Kim, S.S.; You, B.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Park, T.S.; Lee, C.H.; et al. Galpha12 ablation exacerbates liver steatosis and obesity by suppressing USP22/SIRT1-regulated mitochondrial respiration. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 5587–5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Kim, T.H.; Koo, J.H.; Heo, M.J.; Han, C.Y.; Kim, Y.I.; Park, S.Y.; Cho, I.J.; Lee, C.H.; Choi, C.S.; Lee, J.W.; et al. Overproduction of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 1 after loss of Galpha13 in liver exacerbates systemic insulin resistance in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bone, D.B.J.; Meister, J.; Knudsen, J.R.; Dattaroy, D.; Cohen, A.; Lee, R.; Lu, H.; Metzger, D.; Jensen, T.E.; Wess, J. Skeletal Muscle-Specific Activation of Gq Signaling Maintains Glucose Homeostasis. Diabetes 2019, 68, 1341–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Paschoal, V.A.; Walenta, E.; Talukdar, S.; Pessentheiner, A.R.; Osborn, O.; Hah, N.; Chi, T.J.; Tye, G.L.; Armando, A.M.; Evans, R.M.; et al. Positive Reinforcing Mechanisms between GPR120 and PPARgamma Modulate Insulin Sensitivity. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 1173–1188.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kumar, G.A.; Chattopadhyay, A. Statin-Induced Chronic Cholesterol Depletion Switches GPCR Endocytosis and Trafficking: Insights from the Serotonin1A Receptor. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 10 01445 g001 550
Figure 1. G-proteins’ classification and downstream signals.
Figure 1. G-proteins’ classification and downstream signals.
Biomolecules 10 01445 g001
Biomolecules 10 01445 g002 550
Figure 2. G protein-coupled receptors-mediated glycogenesis in hepatocytes.
Figure 2. G protein-coupled receptors-mediated glycogenesis in hepatocytes.
Biomolecules 10 01445 g002
Table
Table 1. G protein-coupled receptors involved in metabolic function of hepatocytes.
Table 1. G protein-coupled receptors involved in metabolic function of hepatocytes.
Gene Symbol (Human)Receptor NameFamilyTransduction Mechanisms
GCGRGlucagon receptor (GCGR)Glucagon receptorsGs
TRHRThyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (TRH)Thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptorsGsGq
ADRB1β1-adrenoceptor (B1AR)AdrenoceptorsGsGi
ADRB2β2-adrenoceptor (B2AR)AdrenoceptorsGsGi
PTGER4Prostaglandin E receptor 4 (EP4)Prostanoid receptorsGsGiGq
S1PR2Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2)Lysophospholipid (S1P) receptorsGsGqG12/13
CNR1Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1)Cannabinoid receptorsGiGs
ADORA1Adenosine A1 receptor (A1)Adenosine receptorsGiGqGsG12/13
ADORA3Adenosine A3 receptor (A3)Adenosine receptorsGiG12/13
HCAR2Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCA2, GPR109A)Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptorsGi
CCR2C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)Chemokine receptorsGi
CCR5C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)Chemokine receptorsGi
P2RY13Purinergic receptor P2Y13 (P2Y13)P2Y receptorsGi
SMOSmoothened receptor (SMO)Class Frizzled GPCRsGiG12/13
AVPR1AArginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A)Vasopressin and oxytocin receptorsGq
OXTROxytocin receptor (OT)Vasopressin and oxytocin receptorsGqGi
P2RY1Purinergic receptor P2Y1 (P2Y1)P2Y receptorsGqGi
P2RY2Purinergic receptor P2Y2 (P2Y2)P2Y receptorsGqGiG12/13
P2RY4Purinergic receptor P2Y4 (P2Y3)P2Y receptorsGq
P2RY6Purinergic receptor P2Y6 (P2Y6)P2Y receptorsGqG12/13
AGTR1Angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1)Angiotensin receptorsGqGi
FFAR4Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4, CPR120)Free fatty acid receptorsGq
FFAR1Free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFA1, GPR40)Free fatty acid receptorsGqGsGi
PTGER1Prostaglandin E receptor 1 (EP1)Prostanoid receptorsGqGi
HTR2A5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A (5-HT2A)5-Hydroxytryptamine receptorsGqGi
HTR2B6-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5-HT2B)5-Hydroxytryptamine receptorsGq
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kimura, T.; Pydi, S.P.; Pham, J.; Tanaka, N. Metabolic Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocytes—Potential Applications for Diabetes and NAFLD. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101445

AMA Style

Kimura T, Pydi SP, Pham J, Tanaka N. Metabolic Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocytes—Potential Applications for Diabetes and NAFLD. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(10):1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kimura, Takefumi, Sai P. Pydi, Jonathan Pham, and Naoki Tanaka. 2020. "Metabolic Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocytes—Potential Applications for Diabetes and NAFLD" Biomolecules 10, no. 10: 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101445

APA Style

Kimura, T., Pydi, S. P., Pham, J., & Tanaka, N. (2020). Metabolic Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Hepatocytes—Potential Applications for Diabetes and NAFLD. Biomolecules, 10(10), 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10101445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop