Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Simulation of Optimal Resource Management during the Diurnal Cycle in Emiliania huxleyi by Genome-Scale Reconstruction and an Extended Flux Balance Analysis Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Design Principles as a Guide for Constraint Based and Dynamic Modeling: Towards an Integrative Workflow
Previous Article in Special Issue
Essences in Metabolic Engineering of Lignan Biosynthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 5
Issue 4
10.3390/metabo5040636
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Cyanobacteria for Photosynthetic Biochemical Production

by
Martin C. Lai
1 and
Ethan I. Lan
2,*
1
Undergraduate Honors Program of Nano Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
2
Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2015, 5(4), 636-658; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5040636
Submission received: 2 July 2015 / Revised: 30 September 2015 / Accepted: 22 October 2015 / Published: 27 October 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Engineering cyanobacteria into photosynthetic microbial cell factories for the production of biochemicals and biofuels is a promising approach toward sustainability. Cyanobacteria naturally grow on light and carbon dioxide, bypassing the need of fermentable plant biomass and arable land. By tapping into the central metabolism and rerouting carbon flux towards desirable compound production, cyanobacteria are engineered to directly convert CO2 into various chemicals. This review discusses the diversity of bioproducts synthesized by engineered cyanobacteria, the metabolic pathways used, and the current engineering strategies used for increasing their titers.

1. Introduction

Increasing concerns over energy and environmental problems prompted the need to develop renewable chemicals and fuels. Advances in genetic manipulation and genomics understanding enabled rapid advancement of microbial cell factory development. Once the enzymatic and genetic information for metabolic pathways producing important commodity biochemicals are solved, these genetic parts are then transferred to other organisms capable of utilizing diverse bioresources for growth. Among the various microbial systems, cyanobacteria have received an enormous amount of attention in recent years. Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes that grow through the direct utilization of sunlight and CO2. Cyanobacteria generate ATP and NADPH through oxygenic photosynthesis, and subsequently use them to fix CO2 into central metabolite through the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle (Figure 1). By tapping into the metabolism of cyanobacteria, central metabolites may be directly transformed into desired biochemicals. This approach bypasses the need of repeated construction and deconstruction of plant biomass, which potentially increases the overall solar energy conversion efficiency.
Metabolites 05 00636 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematics of cyanobacterial central metabolism. NADPH and ATP are generated through light reactions. Subsequently, they are used to convert CO2 into central metabolites, which can be used for biochemical synthesis.
Figure 1. Schematics of cyanobacterial central metabolism. NADPH and ATP are generated through light reactions. Subsequently, they are used to convert CO2 into central metabolites, which can be used for biochemical synthesis.
Metabolites 05 00636 g001
Most commonly used cyanobacterial models (Table 1) are Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, Synechocystis PCC 6803, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 (hereafter referred to as PCC 7942, PCC 6803, PCC 7002, and PCC 7120, respectively). The genomes of these model cyanobacteria have been sequenced. In addition, these sequences have been organized and compiled into databases, such as cyanobase [1], for rapid access. The construction of these genome databases enabled the interpretation of cyanobacterial metabolism and facilitated the development of recombinant engineering. In addition, metabolomics analyses on these cyanobacteria have been reported [2,3,4]. This information, together with the construction of metabolic models [5,6,7], is useful for both understanding the basic metabolism of cyanobacteria and achieving higher level of metabolic redirection and control. PCC 7942 and PCC 6803 are freshwater cyanobacteria, while PCC 7002 is a marine species with the additional advantage of having higher salt tolerance. PCC 7120 is diazotrophic, which means it can utilize N2 as nitrogen source. With the exception of PCC 7120, all other model strains are naturally competent [8,9]. PCC 7120 transformation have been carried out through conjugation [10].
Cyanobacterial carbon and energy metabolisms differ significantly from that of heterotrophs commonly used in fermentation. As a result, additional metabolic engineering strategies such as changing reducing cofactor preference from NADH to NADPH, expressing pathways with higher thermodynamic driving force, and expressing transporters for excretion of products are often needed. Here we summarize the advances made in the metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for the production of biochemicals and discuss the strategies and pathways used to improve their productivities. Table 2 is a comprehensive list containing biochemical targets, genes and promoters used, and production titers. The relevant metabolites associated with each biochemical target are also included in Table 2.
Table
Table 1. Model cyanobacteria strains.
Table 1. Model cyanobacteria strains.
StrainSynechocystis PCC 6803Synechococcus sp.PCC 7002Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942Anabaena sp. 7120
Genome3.6 Mb Chromosome + 7 plasmids size ranging from 2.3 to 120 kb3.0 Mb chromosome + 6 plasmids size ranging from 4.8 to 186 kb2.7 Mb Chromosome + 46 kb plasmid6.4 Mb chromosome + 6 plasmids size ranging from 5.6 to 408 kb
DescriptionFreshwaterSalt tolerantFreshwaterDiazotrophic
TransformationNaturally competentNaturally competentNaturally competentConjugation
Table
Table 2. Chemical targets, promoters used, genes expressed, titer, and relevant central metabolites.
Table 2. Chemical targets, promoters used, genes expressed, titer, and relevant central metabolites.
Chemical TargetStrainPromoter(s) UsedGene(s) ExpressedGene Knockout(s)Titer (mg/L)Days of CultivationRelevant Central MetaboliteCommentsRef.
EthanolPCC 6803Prbcpdc, adh2phb550026PyruvateTwo copies of pdc, optimized cultivation[11]
EthanolPCC 6803PpsbA2pdc, adh 5506PyruvateDecarboxylation of pyruvate serves as efficient driving force[12]
EthanolPCC 7942PtrcpduP, yqhD 18210Acetyl-CoAOxygen tolerant aldehyde dehydrogenase[13]
EthanolPCC 7942PrbcLSpdc, adh 0.027pyruvateexpression of pdc and adh on plasmid[14]
IsopropanolPCC 7942Ptrcthl-atoAD-adc-adh 14615Acetyl-CoAMedium optimization, 2 phase cultivation[15]
IsopropanolPCC 7942Ptrcthl-atoAD-adc-adh 26.59Acetyl-CoAdecarboxylation of acetoacetate traps carbon to acetone[16]
1-ButanolPCC 7942Ptrc/PLlacO1ter/nphT7, pduP, yqhD, crt, hbd 31712Acetyl-CoAOxygen tolerant aldehyde dehydrogenase[13]
1-ButanolPCC 7942Ptrc/PLlacO1ter/nphT7, bldh, yqhD, crt, hbd 3017Acetyl-CoAATP driving force through acetoacetyl-CoA synthase[17]
1-ButanolPCC 7942Ptrc/PLlacO1ter/atoB, adhE2, crt, hbd 14.57Acetyl-CoADark anaerobic incubation[18]
IsobutyraldehydePCC 7942Ptrc/PlacO1kivd/alsS-ilvC-ilvD 11008PyruvateDecarboxylation of KIV serves as effective driving force. In situ product removal[19]
IsobutanolPCC 6803PtackivD, adhA 24021PyruvateOleyol alcohol trap[20]
IsobutanolPCC 7942Ptrckvid, YqhD 4506PyruvateDecarboxylation of KIV serves as effective driving force. In situ product removal[19]
2-MethylbutanolPCC 7942PtrckivD, yqhD, cimA, leuBCD 17812Pyruvate/acetyl-CoAdecarboxylation, native highly active AHAS[21]
Fatty alcoholPCC 6803Prbcjojoba FAR 0.218Acetyl-CoAusing native fatty-acyl-ACP synthesis & expression of jojoba FAR[22]
Fatty alcoholPCC 6803Prbc/PpsbA2jojoba FAR/aas 0.1710Acetyl-CoAexpression of jojoba FAR & overexpression of acyl-ACP synthetase[23]
1,2-PropanediolPCC 7942PtrcsADH (C.beijerinkii), yqhD, mgsA 15010PyruvateNADPH utilization[24]
2,3-ButanediolPCC 6803Ptrcals, aldc, ar 58529PyruvateCodon optimization[25]
2,3-ButanediolPCC 7942PLlacO1alsS, alsD, adh 238020Pyruvatepyruvate pool coupled to decarboxylation and product low toxicity[26]
GlycerolPCC 6803Ptrcgpp2 106817DHAPSalt stress can stimulate glycerol production even in wildtype for about 0.7 mM[27]
GlycerolPCC 7942Ptrcgpp1 117020DHAPaeration, thermodynamically favorable glycerol phosphatase[28]
D-LactatePCC 6803PtrcgldA101, sth 114024Pyruvateexpression of transhydrogenase, codon optmized mutated glycerol dehydrogenase, addition of acetate helped production[29]
D-LactatePCC 6803Pcpc560Dldhpta,phaCE10604Pyruvateknockout of PHB synthesis & acetate formation, expression codon optimized ldh from Lactobacillus delbrueckii[30]
D-LactatePCC 7942PtrcldhD, lldP 82910Pyruvateexpression of lactate transporter, engineered Ldh to use NADPH[31]
D-LactatePCC 7942PlacldhA, lldP, udhA 554PyruvateExpression of LldP protein from E. coli (transporter)[32]
L-LactatePCC 6803Ptrcldh 180040PyruvateLong term production[33]
L-LactatePCC 6803Ptrc2/Ptrc2pk/ldhknockdown PPC83714Pyruvatecodon optimization & natural copy[34]
L-LactatePCC 6803Ptrc/Ptrcldh/sth 28814Pyruvateexpression of transhydrogenase, Bacillus subtilis Ldh[35]
L-LactatePCC 6803PpsbA2ldh, ldhP 15.318PyruvateTested various ldh genes.[36]
3-HydroxypropionatePCC 7942Ptrcmcr, msr 65916Acetyl-CoAselection of best performing malonate semialdehyde reductase (Msr), two NADPH utilizing steps[37]
3-HydroxypropionatePCC 7942Ptrcgpp1, dhaB, puuC 31.710DHAPoxygen sensitive, Dark anaerobic with nutrient limitation[28]
3-HydroxybutyratePCC 6803Ptca/PtactesB/phaA-phaB 53321Acetyl-CoANutrient limitation, NADPH[38]
Itaconic acidPCC 6803Ptaccad 14.516IsocitrateExpression of cad[39]
p-Coumaric acidPCC 6803PpsbA2sam8slr1573 (laccase)82.64Tyrosineknockout of competing pathway for phenolic compound degradation[40]
Fatty acidsPCC 6803Ptrc/Pcpc/PrbctesA, fatB1, fatB2/accBC/accDA, fat B2aas, pta, phb genes,(see comments)1972Acetyl-CoAconstruct six generation strain: extensive knock outs of PHB synthesis, peptidoglycan layer protein, hemolysin-like surface layer protein, cyanophycin synthesis[41]
Fatty acidsPCC 7002Ptrc/PpsbA1tesA/rbcLSfadD13120Acetyl-CoAOverexpression of rubisco[42]
Fatty acidsPCC 7942PtrctesAaas4520Acetyl-CoAknockout of acylACP synthetase blocks utilization of fatty acids[43]
Fatty acidsPCC 7942Ptrc/PpsbA1fat1/rbcLSaas3520Acetyl-CoAoverexpression of ACCase hurts production[44]
D-MannitolPCC 7002PpsbAmtlD, mlpglgA1, glgA2110012F6Pcodon optimization, artificial carbon sink[45]
HexosePCC 7942Ptrcglf, invA, galU 455Glc6Pexpression of sugar transporter[32]
SucrosePCC 7942PtrccscBinvA, glgC27007Glc6PSalt stress, knockout of natural carbon/electron sink[46]
SucrosePCC 6803PpetEcscB, sps, spp, ugpggpS, ggtCD14010Glc6PSalt stress, knockout of competing pathways, expression of sucrose synthesis genes[47]
GlucosylglycerolPCC 6803----ggtCD, ggpR98124G3P/Glc6Psalt shock, hypoosmotic shock[48]
EthylenePCC 6803Ptrcefe 240 nL/mL/dα-Ketoglutaratecompared various promoters, used plasmid based expression[49]
EthylenePCC 6803PpsbAefe 171 mg/L/dα-KetoglutarateMultiple copies of EFE[50]
EthylenePCC 7942PtrcACS-Ctdoc-ACO-Acdoc-Cip2 81.6 nL/mL/d/ODSAMChimeric protein fusion[51]
EthylenePCC 7942PpsbA1efe 10.82 μL/mL/D/ODα-Ketoglutaratechoose a strong promoter site in 7942 and rpsl2-mediated gene replacement[52]
IsoprenePCC 6803PpsbA2IspS (Pueraria montana) 0.358G3P/PyruvateGaseous/aqueous two-phase photobioreactor[53]
IsoprenePCC 6803PpsbA2IspS, hmgS, hmgR, fni, mk, pmd, pmk 0.38Acetyl-CoAexpression of both pathways to IPP increases isoprene production[54]
IsoprenePCC 6803PpsbA2IspS (Pueraria montana) 50 μg/gDCW/dG3P/Pyruvate Expression of isoprene synthase [55]
LimonenePCC 6803PtrclimS (Schizonepeta tenuifolia), dxs, crtE, ipi 130G3P/Pyruvatecodon optimization, enhancing flux through MEP pathway[56]
LimonenePCC 7002PcpcBAlimS (Mentha spicata) 44G3P/Pyruvateproduct trap by dodecane overlayLan[57]
LimonenePCC 7120Pnir::PpsbA1limS (Picea sitchensis), dxs, ipphp, gpps 0.5212G3P/Pyruvateenhancing flux through MEP pathway by gene overexpression, high light density[58]
FarnesenePCC 7120Pnir, PpsbA1faS (Picea abies) 0.3115G3P/Pyruvatecodon optimization[59]
BisabolenePCC 7002PcpcBAbis (Abies grandis) 0.64G3P/Pyruvateproduct trap by dodecane overlay[57]
TocopherolsPCC 6803PnirAhpd (Arabidopsis thaliana) 0.250 mg/gDCW12G3P/PyruvateNitrate inducible promoter[60]
β-CaryophyllenePCC 6803PpsbA2QHS1 0.0467G3P/Pyruvateuse similar pathway in 6803 to produce plant's second metabolite, only need few key enzyme[61]
β-PhellandrenePCC 6803PpsbA2-trc-T7PLHS (Lavandula angustifolia) 0.92G3P/Pyruvatecodon optimization, High light with psba2-trc-T7 fused promoter[62]
β-PhellandrenePCC 6803PpsbA2PHLS (Lavandula angustifolia) 0.28G3P/Pyruvatecodon optimization[63]
DihydroxyacetonePCC 7942Ptrcgpp1, dhaD 78.616DHAPNAD-dependent DhaD could not efficiently reduce glycerol[28]
AcetonePCC 6803Prbc/PcpccftAB/adcphaCE,pta364Acetyl-CoAIncreasing acetyl-CoA pool[64]
AlkanesPCC 7120Padoaar, ado (A. halophytica) 1.25 mg/gDCW5Acetyl-CoASalt stress[65]

2. Short Chain Alcohols

2.1. Ethanol

Some cyanobacteria naturally produce small amounts of ethanol under fermentative conditions [66]. However, genetic engineering was necessary to increase the productivity and enable production under photosynthetic conditions. Ethanol production from PCC 7942 [14] has been demonstrated as early as the late 20th century. While the productivity (54 nmol/L/d/OD730) is relatively low, it is the first alcohol produced from genetically modified cyanobacteria. Ten years later, an ethanol production titer of 550 mg/L with a productivity of 5.2 mmol/L/d/OD730 from PCC 6803 [12] was achieved using photobioreactor. In both PCC 7942 and PCC 6803, ethanol was produced using the pyruvate decarboxylation pathway from Zymomonas mobilis (Figure 2), employing pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc) and alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh). Pyruvate decarboxylation is an irreversible reaction and therefore provides a strong driving force for acetaldehyde formation. Decarboxylation is a good example of a powerful driving force for product formation because the gaseous CO2 leaves the system, pulling the carbon flux towards the product. It is uncertain why the first ethanol report using PCC 7942 was significantly less successful than using PCC 6803. However, it is possible that the gene expression was more stable in the PCC 6803 study as the two genes were introduced into the genome rather than using a plasmid based system.
Metabolites 05 00636 g002 1024
Figure 2. Schematics of pyruvate derived bioproducts. Dashed lines represent multiple enzymatic steps. Evolution of CO2 serves as effective driving force for product formation.
Figure 2. Schematics of pyruvate derived bioproducts. Dashed lines represent multiple enzymatic steps. Evolution of CO2 serves as effective driving force for product formation.
Metabolites 05 00636 g002
To further increase the titer of ethanol production, additional optimization was carried out [11]. In this study, PCC 6803 endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase was expressed instead of that from Z. mobilis. In addition, the expression of multiple copies of the pdc and adh increased the gene dosage. In situ ethanol removal using gas stripping further improved ethanol productivity. As ethanol is continuously removed from the culture, equilibrium further favors to push carbon flux towards ethanol. Through both genetic and cultivation optimizations, ethanol production reached a titer of 5.5 g/L in 26 days, representing the highest biochemical production titer demonstrated in the cyanobacterial engineering literature.
Alternatively, ethanol can also be produced from acetyl-CoA (Figure 3). Ethanol production from acetyl-CoA is mediated by a bifunctional aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase AdhE in a reversible reaction. AdhE is known to be oxygen sensitive, and therefore its functional expression in cyanobacteria would be difficult. To bypass AdhE, the expression of separate oxygen tolerant CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase effectively converts acetyl-CoA to ethanol via acetaldehyde under aerobic conditions [13]. By expressing PduP, an oxygen tolerant CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase from the 1,2-propanediol degradation pathway from Salmonella enterica, and YqhD, a NADPH dependent alcohol dehydrogenase, PCC 7942 was engineered to produce ethanol from acetyl-CoA. The resulting strain produced 182 mg/L of ethanol in 10 days. It is worth noting that this pathway requires two reducing cofactors. While the consumption of two reducing cofactors drives the synthesis of ethanol, these results potentially indicate that decarboxylation serves as a stronger driving force for ethanol production.
Metabolites 05 00636 g003 1024
Figure 3. Schematics of acetyl-CoA derived bioproducts. Dashed lines represent multiple enzymatic steps.
Figure 3. Schematics of acetyl-CoA derived bioproducts. Dashed lines represent multiple enzymatic steps.
Metabolites 05 00636 g003

2.2. Isopropanol

Isopropanol is a natural fermentation product from certain microbes. Industrially, isopropanol is widely used as a solvent and can be dehydrated into propylene, a petroleum-derived monomer for the production of the widely used plastic, polypropylene. The production pathway for isopropanol begins with acetyl-CoA condensation to acetoacetyl-CoA, which is followed by the removal of the CoA moiety to form acetoacetate. Acetoacetate is then decarboxylated into acetone, which is subsequently reduced to isopropanol (Figure 3). Isopropanol production pathway and genes were introduced into PCC 7942 [16]. Despite the expectation that the isopropanol pathway has a decarboxylation as driving force, the resulting strain was not able to produce isopropanol under photosynthetic conditions. Further analysis through acetate feeding showed that the acetyl-CoA level in PCC 7942 is insufficient to support isopropanol production. As an alternative approach, cyanobacteria expressing isopropanol production genes were incubated in the dark without nitrogen and phosphorus. Under nutrient limiting conditions, the acetyl-CoA flux was hypothesized to increase. As a result, 26.5 mg/L of isopropanol was observed [16]. With further optimization of cultivation conditions, isopropanol production has been increased to 146 mg/L [15].
In another study aimed at producing acetone, the precursor to isopropanol, using engineered PCC 6803, acetate forming genes were disrupted to increase the pool of intracellular acetyl-CoA [64]. This approach increased the acetone production six-fold reaching a titer of 36 mg/L in four days. Together, these results indicated that in addition to decarboxylation, increasing the substrate pool is also an important design principle.

2.3. Isobutanol

The isobutanol production pathway utilizes valine biosynthesis. The valine precursor, ketoisovalerate, is decarboxylated to isobutyraldehyde, which can be directly reduced into isobutanol via alcohol dehydrogenase (Figure 2). An isobutanol pathway without alcohol dehydrogenase was first expressed in PCC 7942 [19]. The resulting strain produced isobutyraldehyde with a titer of 1.1 g/L using in situ product removal through gas stripping. Aldehydes are generally toxic to life. Therefore, in situ product removal lowers the toxic effect of isobutyraldehyde production to cyanobacteria. Isobutyraldehyde was further converted to isobutanol in PCC 7942 with additional expression of alcohol dehydrogenase YqhD. The resulting strain produced 450 mg/L of isobutanol in six days.
In another study, the isobutanol pathway was expressed in PCC 6803 [20]. In shake flask experiment, 90 mg/L of isobutanol was observed in six days. Further improvement using oleyl alcohol as a product trap to remove butanol from the culture increased the production titer up to 240 mg/L. This result also demonstrated the usefulness of product removal.

2.4. 1-Butanol

1-Butanol is a natural fermentation product from certain Clostridium species. 1-Butanol production in non-native organisms has been difficult due the enzyme oxygen sensitivity and less well-defined redox reactions. One of the key enzymes of the Clostridium butanol pathway is the butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase electron transferring protein complex. This enzyme was difficult to express in heterologous organisms because it requires association with ferredoxin and is oxygen sensitive. This difficulty was overcome by replacing this enzyme complex with a trans-enoyl-CoA reductase (Ter) [67,68]. Ter directly utilizes NADH as the reducing cofactor for the reduction of crotonyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA (Figure 3) with a large negative change in free energy, making it irreversible and thus serving as an effective driving force for this pathway.
This modified 1-butanol pathway was subsequently transferred to PCC 7942 [18]. However, the resulting strain did not produce 1-butanol under photosynthetic conditions. 1-Butanol was produced only under dark anaerobic conditions [18]. One difficulty was that that the first reaction of the pathway catalyzed by thiolase is thermodynamically unfavorable with Keq of 10−5. To circumvent this difficult step, an alternative route using malonyl-CoA was constructed [17]. Malonyl-CoA reacts with acetyl-CoA to form acetoacetyl-CoA in an irreversible reaction catalyzed by acetoacetyl-CoA synthase. Naturally, malonyl-CoA is the ATP activated product of acetyl-CoA through the acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Combining the reactions catalyzed by acetyl-CoA carboxylase and acetoacetyl-CoA synthase, the net reaction is two acetyl-CoA condensation to acetoacetyl-CoA at the expense of one ATP. This ATP hydrolysis serves as an energy input to convert the thermodynamically unfavorable acetyl-CoA condensation into a favorable reaction. The expression of acetoacetyl-CoA synthase with the butanol production pathway enabled the direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol with a titer of 30 mg/L.
1-Butanol production was further improved by the expression of an oxygen tolerant CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase [13]. The Clostridium aldehyde dehydrogenase is oxygen sensitive, which prohibits its functional expression in cyanobacteria under photosynthetic conditions. To solve this difficulty, the oxygen tolerant CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase of the 1,2-propanediol degradation pathway from S. enterica was used to replace the Clostridium aldehyde dehydrogenase. The resulting strain was able to produce about 300 mg/L of 1-butanol in 12 days, representing a 10-fold increase compared to the 1-butanol produced using the Clostridium aldehyde dehydrogenase. This result shows that the oxygen tolerance of enzymes is also very important for biochemical production using cyanobacteria.

2.5. 2-Methyl-1-Butanol

In addition to isobutanol, other branched short chain alcohols are also biofuel candidates, which have superior properties over ethanol. 2-Methyl-1-butanol (2MB) is derived from 2-keto-3-methylvalerate (KMV), the precursor to isoleucine, through the same keto acid type pathway as the isobutanol production (Figure 2). KMV is derived from 2-ketobutyrate through the isoleucine biosynthesis. 2-Ketobutyrate is derived from either the cyanobacterial native threonine pathway or heterologous citramalate pathway. In a study where the citramalate pathway was expressed in PCC 7942 together with a ketoacid decarboxylase and an alcohol dehydrogenase, 2MB was produced with a titer of 178 mg/L in 12 days [21]. Interestingly, the isoleucine biosynthesis was not overexpressed, and yet 2MB was produced instead of 1-propanol. This result was surprising as the expression of the same set of genes in E. coli resulted in mostly 1-propanol production [69]. This study indicated that the native isoleucine genes were highly expressed and active in PCC 7942. The 2MB production pathway is analogous to the isobutanol pathway, therefore exhibiting similar characteristics and driving force properties. However, the production titer was lower than that of isobutanol. This is potentially due to lower substrate (2-ketobutyrate) pool and higher product toxicity.

3. Fatty Acids and Hydrocarbons

3.1. Fatty Acids

Biodiesel is typically derived from chemically reacting lipids with short chain alcohols such as methanol, ethanol or propanol, into corresponding fatty esters. Instead of producing triacylglycerides, microbial systems can be engineered to directly produce fatty acids, which can also be esterified. Fatty acid production from PCC 6803 has been demonstrated with a titer of 197 mg/L in two days [41]. The expression of TesA, E. coli thioesterase with N-terminus periplasmic directing sequence deleted, and codon optimized plant thioesterases releases fatty acids from their fatty acyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) (ACP) precursors. Together with the deletion of genes encoding for fatty acid activation, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), S-layer, cyanophycin, and acetate biosynthesis, the final titer of fatty acid produced was increased from 1.8 mg/L to 197 mg/L. Liu et al. [70] further demonstrated a strategy which enables cyanobacteria to degrade cellular membranes and release free fatty acids upon CO2 limitation. This fatty acid releasing strategy was accomplished by the expression of lipases under the promoter control of native inorganic carbon uptake system.
In another study, PCC 7002 was engineered to produce fatty acids with a titer of 131 mg/L in 20 days [42]. In particular, it was noted that PCC 7002 has a higher tolerance to fatty acids. In this study, it was found that the expression of heterologous RuBisCo, the primary enzyme responsible for CO2 fixation in CBB pathway, was able to increase the target productivity. Similar effect was also observed by Atsumi et al. [19] in the isobutanol production. While successful in increasing biochemical productivity, the effect of RuBisCo overexpression in carbon fixation rate has yet to be clarified.

3.2. Fatty Alcohols and Hydrocarbons

Many species of cyanobacteria naturally produce small quantities of hydrocarbons [71]. The hydrocarbon production pathway and its enzymes were identified [72,73]. Fatty acyl-ACP, the end product of fatty acid elongation, is reduced to fatty aldehyde by fatty acyl-ACP reductase. Fatty aldehyde decarbonylase then catalyzes the conversion of fatty aldehydes into alkanes or alkenes with formate as a byproduct.
Engineered PCC6803 has been demonstrated to produce fatty alcohols with a titer of around 0.2 mg/L through the expression of fatty acyl-CoA reductase from jojoba [22]. While hydrocarbon biosynthesis is natural to many cyanobacteria, overexpression of the genes involved in alkane biosynthesis in cyanobacteria has been used to increase alkane productivity [65,74,75]. However, compared to the higher productivity of fatty acids, both fatty alcohol and hydrocarbon productions are relatively low, indicating the presence of bottlenecks. It is likely that the key enzyme fatty acyl-ACP reductase is limiting, as the flux to fatty acyl-ACP is capable of supporting higher flux production of fatty acids. As an alternative to using acyl-ACP reductase, liberation of fatty acids followed by activation to acyl-CoAs allows the use of CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase, which has been shown to reduce to fatty aldehyde more efficiently in E. coli [76]. However, this pathway has yet to be tested in cyanobacteria.

4. Olefins

4.1. Ethylene

Microbial ethylene production is catalyzed by the ethylene forming enzyme (Efe). Efe utilizes α-ketoglutarate and produces succinate as a byproduct. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for the production of ethylene has been reported as early as the 1990s [77,78]. However, the productivities reported were relatively low due to the instability of efe within the cyanobacteria as efe becomes truncated through successive subculturing [52]. This problem was addressed by eliminating the potential “hot spots” for mutation within efe through codon optimization [50]. In addition, efe was expressed in multiple copies, increasing gene dosage and therefore the overall enzymatic activity. The resulting engineered PCC 6803 strain was able to achieve significant improvement of ethylene production with a relatively high peak productivity of 171 mg/L/d. Ethylene production is the one of the few example which achieves higher productivity utilizing acetyl-CoA. PCC 6803 has also been engineered to co-utilize xylose, an abundant bioresource, for aiding ethylene production [79]. In addition, cyanobacterial ethylene production has also been achieved through the expression of plant ethylene formation pathway that utilizes S-adenyl-methionine (SAM) in two reaction steps [51]. SAM is first converted to methylthioadenosine and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate. 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate is subsequently converted to ethylene, producing hydrogen cyanide and CO2 as byproducts. The resulting strain achieved 81.6 nL/mL/d/OD [51].

4.2. Isoprene

Cyanobacteria and most other bacteria use the methyl-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway (Figure 4) for the biosynthesis of isoprenoids. Isoprene, a five carbon diene, is the component of polyisoprene or latex, which is also an important target for renewable chemical production. Isoprene is synthesized from Dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) using isoprene synthase. Isoprene synthase is a natural enzyme found in plants, particularly in poplar and kudzu vine. Through heterologous expression of isoprene synthase in PCC 6803 [55], direct photosynthetic isoprene production was achieved. However, the productivity achieved (50 µg/gDCW/d) was relatively low. To increase the productivity of isoprene production, the mevalonate pathway (Figure 4) was co-expressed with isoprene synthase in PCC 6803 [54]. With the additional knockout of glycogen synthesis, the resulting strain was able to produce up to 300 µg/L of isoprene in eight days, representing several fold improvement over the strain expressing isoprene synthase only.

4.3. Terpenoids

Terpenoids represent a large class of bioactive molecules. In particular, some terpenoids are excellent targets for biofuel. Thus far, photosynthetic production of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes has been demonstrated using engineered cyanobacteria. The chemical targets and their corresponding production titers are listed in Table 2. Monoterpene production follows the same MEP pathway as isoprenoids (Figure 4). DMAPP and its isomer isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) react to form the ten carbon metabolite geranyl diphosphate (GPP). Both limonene and β-phellandrene are produced directly from GPP using limonene synthase and β-phellandrene synthase, respectively. Cyanobacterial engineering strategies for limonene and β-phellandrene production include the expression of MEP pathway genes for increasing pathway flux [58], dodecane overlay as product trap [57], and increased expression of limonene synthase through promoter engineering [62]. However, the resulting titers of monoterpene productions remain relatively low (around 1 mg/L). Sesquiterpene biosynthesis elongates GPP into farnesyl diphosphate (FPP). Similar to the production of monoterpenes, biosynthesis of sesquiterpenes such as β-caryophyllene, farnesene, and bisabolene requires only the corresponding synthases. Recently, diterpene manoyl oxide, precursor to forskolin, production has been reported using engineered PCC 6803 [80]. Resulting titers (Table 2) of sesquiterpenes produced using engineered cyanobacteria were relatively low compared to other bioproducts. The bottleneck of terpenoids production using cyanobacteria has yet to be determined.
Metabolites 05 00636 g004 1024
Figure 4. Schematics of mevalonate and MEP pathways for synthesizing isoprenoids and terpenoids. Symbol P inside a diamond represents phosphate. For abbreviations, see below in the abbreviations section.
Figure 4. Schematics of mevalonate and MEP pathways for synthesizing isoprenoids and terpenoids. Symbol P inside a diamond represents phosphate. For abbreviations, see below in the abbreviations section.
Metabolites 05 00636 g004

5. Organic Acids

5.1. Lactate

Lactate fermentation is widely practiced both in food preparation and for renewable plastics. Among the current bioproducts produced by engineered cyanobacteria, lactate is one of the most extensively studied biochemical productions in cyanobacteria and produced with high productivity. Both isomers of lactate have been produced using cyanobacteria. Some engineering strategies involved in lactate production include the expressions of lactate transporters [32], transhydrogenase for converting NADPH produced by photosynthesis into NADH [35], and engineered lactate dehydrogenase (Ldh) for direct NADPH utilization [31], overexpression of pyruvate kinase to trap carbon flux into pyruvate from PEP [34], and knockouts of competing carbon sinks [30]. Currently, the highest lactate production demonstrated is 1.8 g/L in 40 days. In addition, waste water from anaerobic digest rich in organics, nitrogen, and phosphorus, was used to aid photosynthetic lactate production [81] in PCC 6803, illustrating the beneficial application of mixotrophic cultivation.

5.2. 3-Hydroxybutyrate

3-Hydroxyacids are the monomers of polyhydroxyalkanoates, which are biocompatiable and biodegradable thermoplastics or elastomeric materials. 3-Hydroxybutyrate (3HB) production pathway follows the butanol and isopropanol biosynthesis (Figure 3). Acetyl-CoA is used as the cellular metabolite to form acetoacetyl-CoA, which is followed by reduction to 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA. Subsequently, 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA undergoes a thioesterase catalyzed reaction to liberate 3HB and CoA. 3HB production pathway genes were introduced into PCC 6803 [38]. Similar to the isopropanol and butanol reports, production of 3HB is limited under photosynthetic conditions. Nevertheless, as nutrients become limited through consumption, the intracellular acetyl-CoA pool increases. The acetyl-CoA pool naturally increases in PCC 6803 upon nutrient depravation in order to synthesize PHB, a natural carbon storage. As increasing acetyl-CoA pool drives 3HB production, the resulting strain produced up to 533 mg/L of 3HB in 21 days.

5.3. 3-Hydroxpropionate

One of the most well characterized 3-hydroxypropionate (3HP) production pathway utilizes glycerol as its precursor (Figure 5). Glycerol dehydrates to 3-hydroxypropionylaldehyde, which is subsequently oxidized to 3HP. PCC 7942 was engineered to produce 3HP with a titer of 31.7 mg/L in 10 days [28]. In this work, the glycerol dehydratase used was oxygen sensitive. As a result, 3HP was only produced upon incubation in dark anaerobic conditions. The oxygen sensitivity of glycerol dehydratase would have to be addressed before the direct photosynthetic 3HP production can be realized using this pathway.
Metabolites 05 00636 g005 1024
Figure 5. Schematics of 3HP production pathways.
Figure 5. Schematics of 3HP production pathways.
Metabolites 05 00636 g005
Using a different pathway, PCC 7942 was engineered to synthesize 3HP via two step reduction (Figure 5) from malonyl-CoA [37]. This pathway utilizes genes from the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate carbon fixation pathway. The resulting strain produced 665 mg/L of 3HP, 10-fold higher than that produced by strains expressing the glycerol dependent pathway. In the same study, a synthetic pathway was constructed to produce 3HP via β-alanine (Figure 5). The resulting strain expressing this β-alanine dependent pathway produced 186 mg/L of 3HP. Compared to the glycerol dependent pathway for 3HP production, these two pathways do not have any known oxygen sensitivity. Therefore, these results again demonstrated the importance of using oxygen tolerant enzymes for cyanobacterial engineering. It is worth noting that 3HP is toxic at low concentrations to cyanobacteria [82]. Further strain engineering would be necessary for increasing 3HP productivity.

5.4. p-Coumaric Acid

Phenylpropanoids are a large group of secondary metabolites produced by plants with some having anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties. p-Coumaric acid is the precursor to these phenylpropanoids and can be produced via one step deamination from tyrosine. Recently, PCC 6803 was engineered to express tyrosine ammonia lyase (Tal) [40]. Interestingly, expression of Tal alone did not allow production of p-coumaric acid. Further analysis revealed the presence of a native laccase in PCC 6803 that degrades p-coumaric acid. Upon knocking out the laccase gene, the resulting strain was able to produce 82.6 mg/L of p-coumaric acid. The Tal catalyzed reaction serves as a driving force for production of p-coumaric acid as the liberation of NH3 is thermodynamically favorable. A similar driving force has also been employed in the development of protein based biofuel production [83]. PCC 6803 was further engineered to convert p-coumaric acid into caffeic acid [84], also an important chemical with many bioactive properties and a precursor to many other bioactive products.

6. Sugars

Cyanobacteria are generally less tolerant to chemicals than other heterotrophic hosts such as E. coli and yeast, hindering its industrialization. Therefore, as an alternative approach, cyanobacteria are engineered to produce soluble sugars that are not toxic to cyanobacteria and can be directly utilized by heterotrophs. Sucrose is a natural product produced by cyanobacteria as an osmoprotectant. Sucrose can accumulate intracellularly at a concentration of around 300 mM [85,86], representing a large amount of potential sugar that can be produced. To facilitate sucrose transport across the cellular membrane, sucrose permease (CscB), a sucrose/proton symporter, was expressed in PCC 7942 [46]. As cyanobacteria generate proton gradient from inside of thylakoid membranes and alkalinize the environment, it facilitates removal of sucrose from cytoplasm. The expression of CscB and knockout of glycogen synthesis enabled the production of sucrose up to 2.7 g/L in engineered PCC 7942, representing a significant portion of carbon portioned into sucrose production. Glucose and fructose have also been produced by PCC 7942 [32] upon expression of invertase, which hydrolyzes sucrose.
In another study, sucrose production through metabolic engineering of PCC 6803 has been examined [47]. It was found that the sucrose accumulation of PCC 6803 was not as high as PCC 7942. Through overexpressing sucrose synthesis genes and knocking out the genes for glucosylglycerol formation, the resulting strain produced 140 mg/L of sucrose in 10 days.
Mannitol is a sugar alcohol used in the pharmaceutical and food industries. To produce mannitol using recombinant cyanobacteria, PCC 7002 was engineered to express mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (MtlD) and mannitol-1-phosphatase (Mlp) [45]. Together with glycogen synthesis knocked out, the resulting strain produced 1.1 g/L of mannitol. Interestingly, it was noted that mannitol was exported to the culture medium through an unknown mechanism. These relatively high flux photosynthetic sugar/sugar alcohol production studies indicated that the flux for sugar synthesis is naturally high in cyanobacteria as the overexpression of the genes related to the synthesis of upper glycolytic intermediates were not necessary.

7. Diols and Polyol

7.1. 2,3-Butanediol

2,3-Butanediol is a natural fermentative product and synthesized from pyruvate. Using the same acetolactate synthase from the isobutanol biosynthesis, the production of 2,3-butanediol was achieved also with relatively high flux in both PCC 7942 [26] and PCC 6803 [25]. The engineered 2,3-butanediol producing strain from PCC 7942 was able to produce over 2.4 g/L of 2,3-butanediol in 20 days, representing the second highest biochemical production titer reported. Subsequent improvements were made to balance the expression of pathway genes via combinatorial optimization of 5′UTR [87] and increase pyruvate pool by overexpressing enzymes between 3-phosphoglycerate to pyruvate [88]. Interestingly, one study showed that there is a hidden constitutive promoter within both alsS and adh [89]. This observation demonstrated that results obtained from traditional model organisms such as E. coli may or may not always translate into cyanobacteria because of both genetic and metabolic differences.

7.2. 1,2-Propanediol

Similar to other diols, 1,2-propanediol is an important chemical feedstock. The pathway to 1,2-propanediol biosynthesis starts with DHAP, which is converted to methylglyoxal via methylglyoxal synthase. Methylglyoxal is then converted to 1,2-propanediol in two steps using two alcohol dehydrogenases. NADPH utilizing alcohol dehydrogenases were cloned into PCC 7942 together with methylglyoxal synthase. The resulting strain produced 1,2-propanediol with a titer of 150 mg/L in 10 days [24].

7.3. Glycerol

Glycerol has been extensively studied as a carbon source for producing many C3 chemicals such as 1,3-propanediol and 3-hydroxypropionate [90]. Glycerol is naturally synthesized in yeast as an osmoprotectant. Its production pathway starts with DHAP, which is then reduced to glycerol-3-phosphate. Once hydrolyzed, glycerol-3-phosphate becomes glycerol (Figure 5). The expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphoglycerol phosphatase (Gpp) in both PCC 6803 [27] and PCC 7942 [48] have yielded direct photosynthetic production of glycerol. In the PCC 6803 study, increasing the medium salt concentration and the expression of Gpp enabled production of glycerol up to 1.06 g/L. It was noticed that salt stress alone was able to induce glycerol synthesis in the wild type [27]. In the PCC 7942 study, glycerol production reached a titer of 1.17 g/L. In this study, glycerol further served as a precursor for producing 3-hydroxypropionate and dihydroxyacetone using engineered PCC 7942. Co-cultivation of glycerol producing cyanobacteria with Klebsiella pneumoniae also enabled the production of 1,3-propanediol. Glycerol productivity achieved in both studies are relatively high compared to other bioproducts. In addition to the non-toxic effect of glycerol to cyanobacteria, naturally high flux to glycerol-3-phosphate, especially under salt stress, contributed to glycerol’s high flux biosynthesis. Furthermore, the dephosphorylation is also an irreversible reaction in vivo, further providing the driving force necessary for glycerol production.

8. Conclusions

Photoautotrophic production of biochemicals using metabolic engineered cyanobacteria is an attractive direction towards sustainability. Analysis of the chemical productions with higher titers often indicated that an effective metabolic driving force is necessary. It is worth noting that biochemical productions with titers exceeding 1 g/L originate from pyruvate and other metabolites of sugar metabolism, potentially indicating that these metabolites are more accessible to heterologous pathways than acetyl-CoA. While some production pathways naturally have driving forces, many others do not. In those cases, a driving force may be engineered to increase the favorability of the pathway. Improving on these design strategies, the performance of cyanobacterial biochemical factories may also be improved.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Chiao Tung University start up fund and by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant MOST 104-2311-B-009-001-MY2.

Author Contributions

Martin C. Lai and Ethan I. Lan wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

G3P
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
DXP
1-Deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate
MEP
methylerythritol 4-phosphate
CDP-ME
4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methylerythritol
CDP-MEP
4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2-phosphate
MEcPP
2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclopyrophosphate
HMBPP
(E)-4-Hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate
IPP
Isopentenyl pyrophosphate
DMAPP
Dimethylallyl pyrophosphate
GPP
Geranyl pyrophosphate
FPP
Farnesyl pyrophosphate
HMG-CoA
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA
F6P
fructose-6-phosphate
Glc6P
glucose-6-phosphate
DHAP
dihydroxyacetone phosphate
SAM
S-adenosylmethionine

References

  1. Nakao, M.; Okamoto, S.; Kohara, M.; Fujishiro, T.; Fujisawa, T.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Kaneko, T.; Nakamura, Y. Cyanobase: The cyanobacteria genome database update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D379–D381. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Dempo, Y.; Ohta, E.; Nakayama, Y.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Molar-based targeted metabolic profiling of cyanobacterial strains with potential for biological production. Metabolites 2014, 4, 499–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hasunuma, T.; Kikuyama, F.; Matsuda, M.; Aikawa, S.; Izumi, Y.; Kondo, A. Dynamic metabolic profiling of cyanobacterial glycogen biosynthesis under conditions of nitrate depletion. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2943–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nakajima, T.; Kajihata, S.; Yoshikawa, K.; Matsuda, F.; Furusawa, C.; Hirasawa, T.; Shimizu, H. Integrated metabolic flux and omics analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 under mixotrophic and photoheterotrophic conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Triana, J.; Montagud, A.; Siurana, M.; Fuente, D.; Urchueguia, A.; Gamermann, D.; Torres, J.; Tena, J.; de Cordoba, P.F.; Urchueguia, J.F. Generation and evaluation of a genome-scale metabolic network model of Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942. Metabolites 2014, 4, 680–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Knoop, H.; Grundel, M.; Zilliges, Y.; Lehmann, R.; Hoffmann, S.; Lockau, W.; Steuer, R. Flux balance analysis of cyanobacterial metabolism: The metabolic network of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mueller, T.J.; Berla, B.M.; Pakrasi, H.B.; Maranas, C.D. Rapid construction of metabolic models for a family of cyanobacteria using a multiple source annotation workflow. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kufryk, G.I.; Sachet, M.; Schmetterer, G.; Vermaas, W.F.J. Transformation of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as a tool for genetic mapping: Optimization of efficiency. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 206, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bustos, S.A.; Golden, S.S. Expression of the psbDII gene in Synechococcus sp. Strain PCC 7942 requires sequences downstream of the transcription start site. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 7525–7533. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. ElhaI, J.; Vepritskiy, A.; MuroPastor, A.M.; Flores, E.; Wolk, C.P. Reduction of conjugal transfer efficiency by three restriction activities of Anabaena sp. Strain PCC 7120. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 1998–2005. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Gao, Z.X.; Zhao, H.; Li, Z.M.; Tan, X.M.; Lu, X.F. Photosynthetic production of ethanol from carbon dioxide in genetically engineered cyanobacteria. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9857–9865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dexter, J.; Fu, P.C. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for ethanol production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lan, E.I.; Ro, S.Y.; Liao, J.C. Oxygen-tolerant coenzyme a-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase facilitates efficient photosynthetic n-butanol biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2672–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, M.D.; Coleman, J.R. Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Hirokawa, Y.; Suzuki, I.; Hanai, T. Optimization of isopropanol production by engineered cyanobacteria with a synthetic metabolic pathway. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2015, 119, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kusakabe, T.; Tatsuke, T.; Tsuruno, K.; Hirokawa, Y.; Atsumi, S.; Liao, J.C.; Hanai, T. Engineering a synthetic pathway in cyanobacteria for isopropanol production directly from carbon dioxide and light. Metab. Eng. 2013, 20, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lan, E.I.; Liao, J.C. Atp drives direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6018–6023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lan, E.I.; Liao, J.C. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for 1-butanol production from carbon dioxide. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Atsumi, S.; Higashide, W.; Liao, J.C. Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 1177–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Varman, A.M.; Xiao, Y.; Pakrasi, H.B.; Tang, Y.J.J. Metabolic engineering of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 for isobutanol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shen, C.R.; Liao, J.C. Photosynthetic production of 2-methyl-1-butanol from CO2 in cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942 and characterization of the native acetohydroxyacid synthase. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9574–9583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, X.M.; Yao, L.; Gao, Q.Q.; Wang, W.H.; Qi, F.X.; Lu, X.F. Photosynthesis driven conversion of carbon dioxide to fatty alcohols and hydrocarbons in cyanobacteria. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gao, Q.Q.; Wang, W.H.; Zhao, H.; Lu, X.F. Effects of fatty acid activation on photosynthetic production of fatty acid-based biofuels in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Li, H.; Liao, J.C. Engineering a cyanobacterium as the catalyst for the photosynthetic conversion of CO2 to 1,2-propanediol. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Savakis, P.E.; Angermayr, S.A.; Hellingwerf, K.J. Synthesis of 2,3-butanediol by Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 via heterologous expression of a catabolic pathway from lactic acid- and enterobacteria. Metab. Eng. 2013, 20, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oliver, J.W.; Machado, I.M.; Yoneda, H.; Atsumi, S. Cyanobacterial conversion of carbon dioxide to 2,3-butanediol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1249–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Savakis, P.; Tan, X.M.; Du, W.; dos Santos, F.B.; Lu, X.F.; Hellingwerf, K.J. Photosynthetic production of glycerol by a recombinant cyanobacterium. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 195, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, Y.; Tao, F.; Ni, J.; Li, C.; Xu, P. Production of C3 platform chemicals from CO2 by genetically engineered cyanobacteria. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3100–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Varman, A.M.; Yu, Y.; You, L.; Tang, Y.J.J. Photoautotrophic production of d-lactic acid in an engineered cyanobacterium. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.F.; Meng, H.K.; Zhang, Y.P.; Li, Y. Production of optically pure d-lactate from CO2 by blocking the phb and acetate pathways and expressing d-lactate dehydrogenase in cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 2071–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, C.; Tao, F.; Ni, J.; Wang, Y.; Yao, F.; Xu, P. Enhancing the light-driven production of d-lactate by engineering cyanobacterium using a combinational strategy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Niederholtmeyer, H.; Wolfstadter, B.T.; Savage, D.F.; Silver, P.A.; Way, J.C. Engineering cyanobacteria to synthesize and export hydrophilic products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3462–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Angermayr, S.A.; Hellingwerf, K.J. On the use of metabolic control analysis in the optimization of cyanobacterial biosolar cell factories. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 11169–11175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Angermayr, S.A.; van der Woude, A.D.; Correddu, D.; Vreugdenhil, A.; Verrone, V.; Hellingwerf, K.J. Exploring metabolic engineering design principles for the photosynthetic production of lactic acid by Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Angermayr, S.A.; Paszota, M.; Hellingwerf, K.J. Engineering a cyanobacterial cell factory for production of lactic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7098–7106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Joseph, A.; Aikawa, S.; Sasaki, K.; Tsuge, Y.; Matsuda, F.; Tanaka, T.; Kondo, A. Utilization of lactic acid bacterial genes in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in the production of lactic acid. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2013, 77, 966–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lan, E.I.; Chuang, D.S.; Shen, C.R.; Lee, A.M.; Ro, S.Y.; Liao, J.C. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for photosynthetic 3-hydroxypropionic acid production from CO2 using Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Metab. Eng. 2015, 31, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, B.; Pugh, S.; Nielsen, D.R.; Zhang, W.; Meldrum, D.R. Engineering cyanobacteria for photosynthetic production of 3-hydroxybutyrate directly from CO2. Metab. Eng. 2013, 16C, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chin, T.; Sano, M.; Takahashi, T.; Ohara, H.; Aso, Y. Photosynthetic production of itaconic acid in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 195, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Xue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, D.; Daddy, S.; He, Q.F. Genetically engineering Synechocystis sp. pasteur culture collection 6803 for the sustainable production of the plant secondary metabolite p-coumaric acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9449–9454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, X.Y.; Sheng, J.; Curtiss, R. Fatty acid production in genetically modified cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6899–6904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ruffing, A.M. Improved free fatty acid production in cyanobacteria with Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 as host. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ruffing, A.M.; Jones, H.D. Physiological effects of free fatty acid production in genetically engineered Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2190–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ruffing, A.M. Borrowing genes from chlamydomonas reinhardtii for free fatty acid production in engineered cyanobacteria. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1495–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jacobsen, J.H.; Frigaard, N.U. Engineering of photosynthetic mannitol biosynthesis from CO2 in a cyanobacterium. Metab. Eng. 2014, 21, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Ducat, D.C.; Avelar-Rivas, J.A.; Way, J.C.; Silver, P.A. Rerouting carbon flux to enhance photosynthetic productivity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2660–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Du, W.; Liang, F.Y.; Duan, Y.K.; Tan, X.M.; Lu, X.F. Exploring the photosynthetic production capacity of sucrose by cyanobacteria. Metab. Eng. 2013, 19, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tan, X.M.; Du, W.; Lu, X.F. Photosynthetic and extracellular production of glucosylglycerol by genetically engineered and gel-encapsulated cyanobacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2147–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Guerrero, F.; Carbonell, V.; Cossu, M.; Correddu, D.; Jones, P.R. Ethylene synthesis and regulated expression of recombinant protein in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50470. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Ungerer, J.; Tao, L.; Davis, M.; Ghirardi, M.; Maness, P.-C.; Yu, J. Sustained photosynthetic conversion of CO2 to ethylene in recombinant cyanobacterium Synechocystis 6803. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8998–9006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jindou, S.; Ito, Y.; Mito, N.; Uematsu, K.; Hosoda, A.; Tamura, H. Engineered platform for bioethylene production by a cyanobacterium expressing a chimeric complex of plant enzymes. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Takahama, K.; Matsuoka, M.; Nagahama, K.; Ogawa, T. Construction and analysis of a recombinant cyanobacterium expressing a chromosomally inserted gene for an ethylene-forming enzyme at the psbai locus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003, 95, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bentley, F.K.; Melis, A. Diffusion-based process for carbon dioxide uptake and isoprene emission in gaseous/aqueous two-phase photobioreactors by photosynthetic microorganisms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bentley, F.K.; Zurbriggen, A.; Melis, A. Heterologous expression of the mevalonic acid pathway in cyanobacteria enhances endogenous carbon partitioning to isoprene. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lindberg, P.; Park, S.; Melis, A. Engineering a platform for photosynthetic isoprene production in cyanobacteria, using Synechocystis as the model organism. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kiyota, H.; Okuda, Y.; Ito, M.; Hirai, M.Y.; Ikeuchi, M. Engineering of cyanobacteria for the photosynthetic production of limonene from CO2. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 185, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Davies, F.K.; Work, V.H.; Beliaev, A.S.; Posewitz, M.C. Engineering limonene and bisabolene production in wild type and a glycogen-deficient mutant of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Halfmann, C.; Gu, L.P.; Zhou, R.B. Engineering cyanobacteria for the production of a cyclic hydrocarbon fuel from CO2 and H2O. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3175–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Halfmann, C.; Gu, L.P.; Gibbons, W.; Zhou, R.B. Genetically engineering cyanobacteria to convert CO2, water, and light into the long-chain hydrocarbon farnesene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 9869–9877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Qi, Q.G.; Hao, M.; Ng, W.O.; Slater, S.C.; Baszis, S.R.; Weiss, J.D.; Valentin, H.E. Application of the Synechococcus nirA promoter to establish an inducible expression system for engineering the Synechocystis tocopherol pathway. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5678–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Reinsvold, R.E.; Jinkerson, R.E.; Radakovits, R.; Posewitz, M.C.; Basu, C. The production of the sesquiterpene beta-caryophyllene in a transgenic strain of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis. J. Plant. Physiol. 2011, 168, 848–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Formighieri, C.; Melis, A. Regulation of beta-phellandrene synthase gene expression, recombinant protein accumulation, and monoterpene hydrocarbons production in Synechocystis transformants. Planta 2014, 240, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bentley, F.; García-Cerdán, J.; Chen, H.-C.; Melis, A. Paradigm of monoterpene (β-phellandrene) hydrocarbons production via photosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Bioenergy Res. 2013, 6, 917–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y. Designing and creating a modularized synthetic pathway in cyanobacterium Synechocystis enables production of acetone from carbon dioxide. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Kageyama, H.; Waditee-Sirisattha, R.; Sirisattha, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Mahakhant, A.; Takabe, T. Improved alkane production in nitrogen-fixing and halotolerant cyanobacteria via abiotic stresses and genetic manipulation of alkane synthetic genes. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 71, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Stal, L.J.; Moezelaar, R. Fermentation in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 21, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shen, C.R.; Lan, E.I.; Dekishima, Y.; Baez, A.; Cho, K.M.; Liao, J.C. Driving forces enable high-titer anaerobic 1-butanol synthesis in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2905–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bond-Watts, B.B.; Bellerose, R.J.; Chang, M.C.Y. Enzyme mechanism as a kinetic control element for designing synthetic biofuel pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Atsumi, S.; Liao, J.C. Directed evolution of Methanococcus jannaschii citramalate synthase for biosynthesis of 1-propanol and 1-butanol by Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7802–7808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Liu, X.; Fallon, S.; Sheng, J.; Curtiss, R., 3rd. CO2-limitation-inducible green recovery of fatty acids from cyanobacterial biomass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6905–6908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Han, J.; McCarthy, E.D.; Hoeven, W.V.; Calvin, M.; Bradley, W.H. Organic geochemical studies, ii. A preliminary report on the distribution of aliphatic hydrocarbons in algae, in bacteria, and in a recent lake sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1968, 59, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Schirmer, A.; Rude, M.A.; Li, X.; Popova, E.; del Cardayre, S.B. Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science 2010, 329, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mendez-Perez, D.; Herman, N.A.; Pfleger, B.F. A desaturase gene involved in the formation of 1,14-nonadecadiene in Synechococcus sp. Strain PCC 7002. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6073–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Peramuna, A.; Morton, R.; Summers, M.L. Enhancing alkane production in cyanobacterial lipid droplets: A model platform for industrially relevant compound production. Life 2015, 5, 1111–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, W.H.; Liu, X.F.; Lu, X.F. Engineering cyanobacteria to improve photosynthetic production of alka(e)nes. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Choi, Y.J.; Lee, S.Y. Microbial production of short-chain alkanes. Nature 2013, 502, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fukuda, H.; Sakai, M.; Nagahama, K.; Fujii, T.; Matsuoka, M.; Inoue, Y.; Ogawa, T. Heterologous expression of the gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme from Pseudomonas syringae in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus. Biotechnol. Lett. 1994, 16, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sakai, M.; Ogawa, T.; Matsuoka, M.; Fukuda, H. Photosynthetic conversion of carbon dioxide to ethylene by the recombinant cyanobacterium, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942, which harbors a gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme of Pseudomonas syringae. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 84, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, T.C.; Xiong, W.; Paddock, T.; Carrieri, D.; Chang, I.F.; Chiu, H.F.; Ungerer, J.; Hank Juo, S.H.; Maness, P.C.; Yu, J. Engineered xylose utilization enhances bio-products productivity in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Metab. Eng. 2015, 30, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Englund, E.; Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Miao, R.; Hamberger, B.; Lindberg, P. Metabolic engineering of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 for production of the plant diterpenoid manoyl oxide. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hollinshead, W.D.; Varman, A.M.; You, L.; Hembree, Z.; Tang, Y.J.J. Boosting d-lactate production in engineered cyanobacteria using sterilized anaerobic digestion effluents. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 169, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Begemann, M.B.; Zess, E.K.; Walters, E.M.; Schmitt, E.F.; Markley, A.L.; Pfleger, B.F. An organic acid based counter selection system for cyanobacteria. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Huo, Y.X.; Cho, K.M.; Rivera, J.G.L.; Monte, E.; Shen, C.R.; Yan, Y.J.; Liao, J.C. Conversion of proteins into biofuels by engineering nitrogen flux. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Xue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Grace, S.; He, Q. Functional expression of an Arabidopsis p450 enzyme, p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase, in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 for the biosynthesis of caffeic acid. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Klahn, S.; Hagemann, M. Compatible solute biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Suzuki, E.; Ohkawa, H.; Moriya, K.; Matsubara, T.; Nagaike, Y.; Iwasaki, I.; Fujiwara, S.; Tsuzuki, M.; Nakamura, Y. Carbohydrate metabolism in mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 defective in glycogen synthesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3153–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Oliver, J.W.; Machado, I.M.; Yoneda, H.; Atsumi, S. Combinatorial optimization of cyanobacterial 2,3-butanediol production. Metab. Eng. 2014, 22, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Oliver, J.W.; Atsumi, S. A carbon sink pathway increases carbon productivity in cyanobacteria. Metab. Eng. 2015, 29, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Nozzi, N.E.; Atsumi, S. Genome engineering of the 2,3-butanediol biosynthetic pathway for tight regulation in cyanobacteria. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Clomburg, J.M.; Gonzalez, R. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: A platform for renewable fuels and chemicals. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, M.C.; Lan, E.I. Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Cyanobacteria for Photosynthetic Biochemical Production. Metabolites 2015, 5, 636-658. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5040636

AMA Style

Lai MC, Lan EI. Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Cyanobacteria for Photosynthetic Biochemical Production. Metabolites. 2015; 5(4):636-658. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5040636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Martin C., and Ethan I. Lan. 2015. "Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Cyanobacteria for Photosynthetic Biochemical Production" Metabolites 5, no. 4: 636-658. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5040636

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop