Next Article in Journal
Tissue-Based Metabolomic Profiling of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative Modeling of Urinary Metabolomics and Metal Exposure Reveals Systemic Impacts of Electronic Waste in Exposed Populations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutraceutical Potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula in the Diet Formulation for Male Goat

by
Jesús Humberto Reyna-Fuentes
1,
Cecilia Carmela Zapata-Campos
1,*,
Jorge Ariel Torres-Castillo
2,
Daniel López-Aguirre
3,
Juan Antonio Núñez-Colima
4,
Luis Eliezer Cruz-Bacab
5,
Fabián Eliseo Olazarán-Santibáñez
1,
Fernando Sánchez-Dávila
6,
Aida Isabel Leal-Robles
7 and
Juan Antonio Granados-Montelongo
4
1
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, ejido Santa Librada, Ciudad Victoria 87274, Tamaulipas, Mexico
2
Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Colonia División del Golfo 356, amp la Libertad, Ciudad Victoria 87019, Tamaulipas, Mexico
3
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Campus del Centro Universitario, Ciudad Victoria 87149, Tamaulipas, Mexico
4
Departamento de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
5
División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carretera Villahermosa-Teapa, Km 25, R/A. La Huasteca 2a Sección, Villahermosa 86280, Tabasco, Mexico
6
Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Posgrado Conjunto, Francisco I. Madero s/n, Hacienda la Cañada, General Escobedo 66050, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
7
Departamento de Botánica, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo 25315, Coahuila, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2025, 15(7), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070457
Submission received: 18 April 2025 / Revised: 1 July 2025 / Accepted: 3 July 2025 / Published: 5 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Metabolomics)

Abstract

Background: Xerophilous scrubland is a semi-desert ecosystem characterized by a wide diversity of shrubs, which have secondary compounds with nutraceutical potential that could be used as feed for livestock, specifically by goats, since this species has developed behavioral and physiological adaptations that allow it to take advantage of the plant resources of said scrubland. Objective: To evaluate the nutraceutical potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula, native species of the xerophilous scrubland, when incorporated as ingredients in goat diets. Methods: Integral diets for male goats were prepared, formulated with 35% inclusion of Havardia pallens, Vachellia rigidula, and Medicago sativa, the latter used as a plant control species. The content of flavonoids and total phenols was compared using colorimetric methods, and the antioxidant capacity was measured using the FRAP method. RP-HPLC-ESI-MS characterized the bioactive compounds in the different extracts. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA. Results: The aqueous extraction of Vachellia rigidula showed the highest concentration of total phenols ( x ¯ = 18.22 mg GAE/g−1), followed by the ethanolic extract in the same species ( x ¯ = 17.045 mg GAE/g−1). Similarly, Vachellia rigidula presented the highest antioxidant capacity ( x ¯ = 144,711.53 µmol TE/g−1), while Medicago sativa presented the lowest ( x ¯ = 11,701.92 µmol TE/g). The RP-HPLC-ESI-MS analysis revealed that Vachellia rigidula presented a higher abundance of flavones, catechins, flavonols, methoxyflavones, and tyrosols. However, Harvardia pallens presented higher levels of methoxycinnamic and hydroxycinnamic acids. One-way ANOVA results showed that diets containing 35% Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens significantly contrasted (p < 0.05), increased the content of secondary compounds and antioxidant capacity compared to the control species. Furthermore, including Vachellia rigidula led to a significantly higher antioxidant capacity (p < 0.05) than diets with Havardia pallens or Medicago sativa. Conclusions: Incorporating the leguminous shrubs Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens into the formulation of comprehensive diets for buck goats improves the content and availability of phenols, flavonoids, and antioxidants. However, in vivo evaluation of these diets is important to determine their physiological and productive effects on the animals.

1. Introduction

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) suggests the development and implementation of effective strategies for food security, one of which is to provide society with livestock species that can produce efficiently under adverse environmental conditions, thus obtaining an adequate and sustainable use of local resources [1]. In this context, goat farming has great development potential, since this animal species has proven capable of adapting to adverse environmental conditions such as climate, availability and distribution of plant resources, plant characteristics, and water availability, characteristics that other livestock species, such as cattle, cannot develop [2,3]. Goat feeding is based on obtaining the necessary elements from the rangeland for their growth, development, and reproduction, such as proteins, fiber, vitamins, minerals, and energy [4]. However, when these elements are not adequately present in the diet, goat farmers usually supplement them with grain concentrates and the purchase of forage legumes. For small producers, supplementing the diet with grains or forage hay is expensive and depends largely on its availability in the region and throughout the year [5].
The xerophile scrubland in Mexico, specifically the Tamaulipas thornscrub, is characterized by a wide diversity of plant species, mainly shrubs that can be used as fodder for goats, since they have nutritional and chemical characteristics that could have a positive effect on meat and milk production. In this sense, the use of forage shrubs could be implemented as a viable strategy to be added to comprehensive diets and thus improve feed quality and reduce production costs by partially or fully replacing cereal grain-based feeds using local plant resources [6]. Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens are two shrub species that could be used as fodder for goats. Both are native to the Tamaulipas thornscrub ecosystem. Vachellia rigidula is a shrub or small tree with a crude protein (CP) content of 15%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) of 49.3%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) of 36.5%, and cellulose of 26.4% [7]. On the other hand, Harvardia pallens is characterized by higher leaf renewal between April and May; however, its mature leaves remain throughout the year, even during winter. This species favors the development of herbaceous species such as Lantana spp. and Stipa lessingiana (grass), which also have forage potential [8]. Both shrub species are consumed by goats grazing in rangelands of northeastern Mexico [9]. Shrubs often contain bioactive compounds (e.g., flavonoids, terpenes, phenols, etc.) produced by the plant from secondary metabolism [10]. Based on these observations, the present research sought to evaluate the nutraceutical potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula when incorporated as ingredients in diets formulated for male goats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was developed in a semiarid zone of Tamaulipas; specifically, in the hydrological basin of the Purificación River and between the foothills of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Its location can be found between 23°44′06″ N and 99°07′51″ W at an altitude of 321 m and intersected by the Tropic of Cancer at 23°27′. The zone has a mean annual temperature of 23.5 °C and the mean annual precipitation is 780 mm, with a semi-dry and warm sub-humid climate [11].

2.2. Plant Collection

Plant samples were collected from the Boca de Juan Capitán common land in Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. This area was selected for the abundance of V. rigidula (gavia) and H. pallens (tenaza) at a height below 2 m. Shrubs were randomly selected, with three leaf and stem samples taken from each species. The forage legume M. sativa (alfalfa) was selected as a control plant. It should be noted that this legume is not native to the region and was therefore purchased from a forage company. Samples were stored at −18 °C until processing.

2.3. Bromatological Analysis

The samples were analyzed in the animal nutrition laboratory of the Faculty of Engineering and Sciences of the Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. The plant species samples were dehydrated in a forced-air oven at 50–60 °C for 48 h to determine the partial dry matter (DM). The dried samples were ground in a Wiley mill with a 1 mm sieve (Model 4; Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA). Bromatological analysis was performed in triplicate. The ash content was determined (ID 942.05) by incineration at 600 °C for 2 h using a muffle furnace. Crude protein (CP) (ID 954.05) was obtained using the macro-Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25) [12]. The fibrous fraction was determined through acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and lignin using the procedure described by Van Soest [13].

2.4. Metabolite Extraction and Secondary Compound Analysis

An aqueous extraction of three sub-samples (5 g each) from the ground extract of the three plant species was carried out. The samples were weighed in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, then poured with 50 mL of distilled water at 60 °C and homogenized. The samples were then placed in an oven at 60 °C, stirring every 15 min for 60 min. The samples were filtered through a Whatman membrane (No. 41). To obtain a larger amount of extract, the samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 3500 rpm. Finally, the aqueous extract was placed in amber bottles and stored at a temperature of 4 °C until processing. The methanolic and ethanolic extraction was carried out by weighing 2.5 g of each sample and placing it in a test tube to which 25 mL of each of the solutions and distilled water (70:30 v/v) were added, it was vortexed to homogenize and left to stand for 24 h, avoiding exposure to light and refrigerated at 4 °C. Subsequently, it was centrifuged for 20 min at 3500 rpm and the supernatant was obtained for later analysis.

2.5. Total Flavonoids

The content of total flavonoids was determined as previously described [14]; 10 µL aliquot of the supernatant of the triplicate extracts, prepared previously, was used, 1.5 mL of ethanol (IBI Scientific, catalog no. 15720, Dubuque, IA, USA.) at 95%, 2.7 µL of an AlCl3 solution (R.A article 24011-F, key H87), 2.7 µL of 1 M CH3CO2K solution (catalog 5089, CAS No. 127-08-2) and 102.7 µL of distilled water (REPR brand, article 10294, key H87) will be added; the mixture will be incubated for 40 min. Readings were taken using a spectrophotometer (model no. iMark, serial no. 11293) at 415 nm wavelength. The quantification of the concentration was performed using a standard curve prepared with quercetin (SIGMA brand, item Q4951-10G). Results were expressed as mg quercetin equivalents per g dry matter (mg/EQ/g–1 DM).

2.6. Total Phenols

Total phenols were determined by the Folin Ciocalteu technique [15]; 2 µL of the extracts were used in triplicate, deposited in a 96-microwell plate, then 25 µL of the Folin Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma Aldrich F9252) was added, homogenized and let stand for 5 min, then 125 µL of anhydrous sodium carbonate (catalog 5015, CAS No. 497-19-8 (NaCO3, 0.01 M) was added, stirred again and let stand for 5 min. Finally, 49 µL of distilled water was added to perform the incubations and to be read in a spectrophotometer (model No. iMark, series 11293) at 750 nm. The concentration of total phenols was calculated using gallic acid, and the results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent per gram of DM of the plant extract (mg/EAG/g−1 DM).

2.7. Antioxidant Capacity by the Ferric Iron (Fe+3) Reduction Method (FRAP)

The FRAP method is based on the reduction of ferric iron (Fe+3) present in the FRAP reagent to the ferrous form (Fe+2) by the presence of antioxidants [16]. For the reading of the samples, 900 µL of FRAP solution, 30 µL of sample, and 120 µL of distilled water were used. The FRAP solution is composed of 25 mL of acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution (pH 3.6), 2.5 mL of 10 [mM] TPTZ solution diluted with 40 [mM] HCl and 20 [mM] FeCl3 solution. A blue coloration is generated, of intense proportionality to the reducing capacity of the sample (a ferrous-TPTZ complex is generated) that can be quantified by colorimetry (593 nm) based on a ferrous sulfate standard. The absorbance was determined at a wavelength of 593 nm in a spectrophotometer reader model No. iMark, series 11293. For each reading, the absorbance reading of the control sample was considered. The final absorbance of the samples was compared with the standard curve of Trolox (100–1000 μmol/L) dissolved with ethanol (brand IBI SCIENTIFIC, catalog IBI 15720 at 96%).

2.8. RP-HPLC-ESI-MS

The reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography analyses were performed in a Varian HPLC system including an autosampler (Varian ProStar 410, USA), a ternary pump (Varian ProStar 230I, USA), and a PDA detector (Varian ProStar 330, USA). A liquid chromatograph ion trap mass spectrometer (Varian 500-MS IT Mass Spectrometer, USA) equipped with an electrospray ion source was also used. In brief, 10 µL of the samples were injected into a Denali C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 µm, Grace, USA). The oven temperature was maintained at 30 °C. The eluents were formic acid (0.2%, v/v; solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The following gradient was applied: initial, 3% B; 0–5 min, 9% B linear; 5–15 min, 16% B linear; 15–45 min, 50% B linear. The column was then washed and reconditioned. The flow rate was maintained at 0.2 mL/min, and elution was monitored at 245, 280, 320, and 550 nm. The whole effluent (0.2 mL/min) was injected into the source of the mass spectrometer without splitting. All MS experiments were conducted in negative mode [M-H]−1. Nitrogen was used as nebulizing gas, and helium as damping gas. The ion source parameters were spray voltage 5.0 kV, capillary voltage 90.0 V, and temperature 350 °C. The data were collected and processed using MS Workstation software (V 6.9). The samples were first analyzed in full scan mode, acquired in the m/z range 50–2000 [17,18].

2.9. Diet Formulation and Standardization

The protein and energy levels of the diets were standardized based on the nutritional requirements of growing male goats [19]. Inclusion calculations were made based on the nutritional characteristics of each raw material, ground sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), sorghum straw (dry vegetative residues from the sorghum crop, typically composed of stems and leaves, commonly used as a fibrous source in ruminant diets), molasses, soybean meal (Glycine max), M. sativa, H. pallens, and V. rigidula) concerning DM, CP, EE, NDF, and ADF. The diets were then balanced (DME, a diet with M. sativa; DHP, a diet with H. pallens; DVR, a diet with V. rigidula) using a trial-and-error method. To prepare the diet, the ingredients were weighed and mixed using a homogenizer (Oster FPSTSM3711). For shrubs, leaves were used, while fibrous materials such as sorghum and alfalfa straw were ground to facilitate mixing. Water was added to the liquid ingredient, molasses (70:30 v/v), and incorporated during homogenization. The same procedure was followed, but without the inclusion of the plants, to a mixture of only the conventional ingredients, thus obtaining a fourth diet. The samples were then dehydrated in a forced-air oven at 50–60 °C for 48 h to determine partial dry matter (DM). Subsequently, they were ground in a Wiley mill equipped with a 1 mm sieve (Model 4; Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA). The diets were stored until further analysis.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were conducted with the analytical software package SAS version 9.2 [20]. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each evaluated variable, including bromatological parameters, total phenol and flavonoid concentrations, and antioxidant capacity. When significant differences were identified (p < 0.05), means were compared using Tukey’s post hoc test.

3. Results

3.1. Bromatological Analysis

Table 1 shows the diets formulated with 35% inclusion of the native shrubs H. pallens and V. rigidula, as well as the forage legume M. sativa.
The bromatological analysis (Table 2) of the plant species determined that V. rigidula had the highest FDA value (40.48 ± 4.71%), followed by H. pallens with 31.43 ± 4.75%. Regarding NDF, no significant differences were observed between the plant species evaluated. The level of fibrous fraction decreased in whole grain diets; however, the DVR diet made with V. rigidula leaves had the highest fibrous content of both FDA (21.18 ± 0.54%) and NDF (37.47 ± 0.90%). The plant species with the lowest fiber content was M. sativa; however, in whole grain diets, this element was similar to H. pallens. Regarding CP, M. sativa recorded the highest value (22.66 ± 2.13%), which was statistically comparable to that of H. pallens (20.67 ± 1.69%). The CP content decreased in integral diets; the DME diet had the highest protein content (16.7 ± 0.01%), while the DHP (14.24 ± 0.35%) and DVR (13.4 ± 0.05%) diets showed statistically similar CP levels. The ash content was significantly higher in the formulated diets than in the forage species. In this sense, the DME diet presented the highest ash content (11.86 ± 0.09%), followed by the DHP (11.33 ± 0.10%) and the DVR (10.15 ± 0.02%). Finally, regarding the lignin content, V. rigidula presented the highest value (21.4 ± 3.43%), significantly higher than that of the other plant species and the integral diets.

3.2. Total Phenolic (TPC) and Flavonoid Content (TFC)

The concentration of phenolic compounds differed significantly between plant species and extraction solvents (p < 0.01). However, the flavonoid content did not show significant variation (p > 0.05). The aqueous extract of V. rigidula exhibited the highest concentration of phenolic compounds ( x ¯ = 18.22 mg/GAE/g−1), followed by its ethanolic extract ( x ¯ = 17.05 mg/GAE/g−1). The lowest phenolic concentrations were recorded in the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of M. sativa ( x ¯ = 7.61 mg/GAE/g−1) (Table 3).
The total concentration of secondary compounds in the experimental diets revealed that the DVR-based formulation had the highest total phenolic content per gram (g/GAE/g−1). However, this value was statistically similar to the DHP diet, while the DME diet had the lowest concentration (p = 0.007). Similarly, the total flavonoid content of the DME and DHP diets did not show significant differences. However, the DVR diet showed a significantly higher flavonoid concentration ( x ¯ = 230/g/QE/g−1) (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

3.3. Antioxidative Capacity

The native species V. rigidula presented the highest level of antioxidant capacity (144,711.53 μmol /TE/g−1), while H. pallens was statistically similar to M. sativa. (Table 5).
The antioxidant capacity of diets formulated with V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa varied significantly depending on the type of extraction. Diets with V. rigidula (DVR) showed the highest antioxidant activity in both aqueous (147,966.66 ± 10,315.38 μmol/TE/g−1) and methanolic (139,847.44 ± 11,097.05 μmol/TE/g−1) extracts, being significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those formulated with H. pallens (DHP) and M. sativa (DME), whose antioxidant capacities were considerably lower (Table 6). When native species such as forage are eliminated from the diet, the antioxidant capacity is further reduced in the μmol/TE/g−1 values in the different extraction solvents (Table 6).

3.4. Identification of Phytochemicals

Twelve organic compounds were identified in the extracts of Vachellia rigidula through RP-HPLC-ESI-MS, including flavones, flavanones, methoxyflavones, catechins, proanthocyanidins, tyrosols, lignans, and hydroxycinnamic acids. Moreover, the phytochemical analyses of aqueous, ethanolic, and methanolic extracts of V. rigidula highlight the presence of compounds with great antioxidative potential (Table 7).
The phytochemical analysis of Havardia pallens revealed six secondary compounds classified within the groups of flavanones, flavonols, methoxycinnamic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, methoxyflavones, and methoxyflavonols. In this manner, compounds such as Ferulic acid 4-O-glucoside, Caffeic acid 4-O-glucoside, Sinensetin, Myricetin, 5,3′,4′-Trihydroxy-3-methoxy-6:7-methylenedioxyflavone 4′-O-glucuronide, feruloyl glucose, Myricetin 3-O-rhamnoside and Peonidin 3-O-(6″-acetyl-glucoside) were also identified (Table 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Bromatological Analysis

The nutritional status of animals is an important factor in determining the quality of their products and derivatives (e.g., meat, milk, dairy products). It can be improved by including secondary compounds such as phenolics, terpenes, and flavonoids in their diet [44,45]. In this context, animal feed can be strategically enriched with these compounds to provide a functional and nutraceutical supplement [46]
Functional foods, by definition, possess intrinsic nutraceutical value that, regardless of whether their active components are fully identified, contributes to maintaining and improving animal health. Furthermore, bioactive compounds can be administered in concentrated forms or incorporated directly into feed formulations, thus improving their functional properties [45].
Native shrub legumes, such as Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula, are available year-round in the Tamaulipas thornscrub ecosystem and are frequently consumed by browsing goats. However, Medicago sativa, particularly its regrowth paste (straw), is widely used as a ruminant feed resource [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. As nitrogen-fixing plants, legumes are typically characterized by their high protein content, which varies between 12% and 30%. The available information on the bromatological characteristics of V. rigidula is limited. However, Ramírez et al. (1999) [48] reported crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin values of 16.4%, 41.8% and 22.9% respectively; likewise Ramirez-Lozano (2006) [49] reported 17% of CP, 14% of lignin and 15% of cell wall, values that closely coincide for lignin and ADF, however for CP our value is 4.16 percentage points below. For Havardia pallens, Foroughbakhch et al. (2013) [9] reported a CP content of 24%. NDF, ADF, and lignin levels are critical indicators of feed potential and cell wall digestibility in ruminants. Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2002) [50] reported a lignin content of 7.4% for Havardia pallens and 17.4% for Vachellia rigidula. There is insufficient bromatological information on both species; however, in agronomic data, Havardia pallens is the species with the second highest relative abundance index in areas of regenerating scrub disturbed by livestock activity [51], and Vachellia rigidula also showed a strong correlation in the estimation of leaf biomass [52]. Therefore, these two species are abundant in the thorny scrubland of Tamaulipas, so they can provide food for goats at strategic times. Torres-Fajardo et al. (2021) [53] mention that to decide whether a plant is used as a functional food or nutraceutical, it is necessary to know if this plant is present in the rangeland and if the animals consume it. Both Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens meet these conditions.
Grazing goats naturally select plants that meet their nutritional needs at various physiological stages [54]. In this sense, the dry season diet of pregnant goats consists of 64% NDF, 43% ADF, and 7% lignin [55], while the diet of adult goats during the rainy season contains 54% NDF, 36% ADF, and 7% lignin [56]. Both studies indicate the values found are within acceptable ranges for fibrous fractions in ruminant diets.
Gholve et al. (2021) [57] formulated a diet for growing males and females, with an inclusion of 25% of the legume Sesbania sesban, yielding 19% CP, 49.2% NDF, and 41.8% ADF. This formulation allowed daily weight gains of 45.76 g/day, comparable to those obtained with commercial food (45.62 g/day). Zapata-Campos et al. (2021) [10] used leaves of Leucaena leucochepala, Vachellia farnesiana, and Prosopis laevigata as alternative ingredients in grain diets for growing male goats with a 33% inclusion, as well as a control diet based on alfalfa. They found that the average daily gain (GDP) did not differ between males fed alfalfa, A. farnesiana, or L. leucocephala (120 26, 134 37, and 103 29 g/d, respectively). Males fed alfalfa and A. farnesiana had larger scrotal circumferences (p < 0.05) (26.6 0.4 and 25.8 1.5 cm) than those fed L. leucocephala or P. laevigata (24.3 1.2 and 24.1 2.0 cm). They concluded that a conventional legume can be replaced by native legumes. Therefore, the legumes studied here, with the results obtained in the bromatological analysis, may be a suitable alternative ingredient for use in grain-based diets, especially to complement the diets of male goats.

4.2. Phenolic Acids

Goats have developed different adaptive mechanisms to tolerate the secondary compounds they consume from rangeland plant species. These are anatomical, such as the enlargement of the parotid glands to increase salivation, or physiological, such as the production of proline-rich salivary proteins (PRPs) with the ability to bind tannins [58,59]. Native legumes, in addition to their protein content, also contain secondary compounds [60] that can exert beneficial or detrimental effects on the animals that consume them [61].
The presence of phenolic compounds is often indicative of tannin content [61,62]. When consumed at high concentrations, tannins can interfere with biological functions by reducing crude protein (CP) utilization, decreasing feed palatability, and inhibiting the activity of various digestive enzymes [63,64]. However, when present at adequate levels, tannins can provide multiple functional benefits, including antioxidant, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, and anthelmintic effects [65,66]. These effects can be observed in both animal performance and the quality of animal products [67]. The phenolic content in Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens is lower than that reported for other plant species, such as Vachellia nubica ( x ¯ = 30 mg/GAE/g−1) and Vitex negundo ( x ¯ = 27.72 mg/GAE/100 g−1), although it is higher than in Moringa oleifera ( x ¯ = 7.18 mg/GAE/g−1) [68,69]. For his part, Arenaz (2021) [70] found 124.98 mg GAE/g in acetone extract, while in ethanolic extract, the phenol content was 125.93 mg GAE/g for Vachellia rigidula leaves, values higher than those found in our experiment. In general, the leaves of the Acacia or Vachellia genus have a significant presence of secondary compounds that have been used mainly in traditional medicine [71]. However, his effect is also reflected in animals since the plant species of this genus are very abundant in pastures grazed by goats [72].
Flavonoids, known for their antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties [73], were found in lower concentrations in the evaluated species compared to Moringa oleifera ( x ¯ = 10.15 mg/QE/g−1) [74], Vachellia nilotica ( x ¯ = 1.14 mg/QE/g−1) [75], and Medicago sativa ( x ¯ = 6.65 mg/RE/g−1) [76]. Nevertheless, Cavazos et al. (2021) [77] reported antioxidant activity in Vachellia rigidula extracts, which was attributed to the presence of terpenes and tannins. It is important to note that limited information is available regarding the secondary metabolite profile and antioxidant potential of Havardia pallens. While M. sativa has been extensively studied, and its leaves, flowers, and seeds have been found to contain appreciable levels of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity [77,78,79].

4.3. Antioxidative Capacity

In diets prepared with the native species, Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula, the difference in antioxidant capacity values is notable compared to diets prepared with Medicago sativa straw, and this distinction is even more noticeable when the three plant species are not added to the diet. Therefore, the effect of bromatological characteristics and the presence of secondary compounds is observed in diets prepared with these plant species. Thus, Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula, when added to diets based on conventional feeds, demonstrate exceptional potential as functional and nutraceutical alternatives.
Delgadillo-Puga et al. (2019) [67] formulated diets for dairy goats with incremental inclusion levels (10%, 20%, and 30%) of Vachellia farnesiana, in combination with Medicago sativa (48–60%). These diets presented crude protein (CP) levels of 15.38%, 14.98%, and 13.85%, respectively. The impact of these formulations was assessed through milk quality, revealing that the diet containing 30% Vachellia farnesiana resulted in an average phenolic content of 305.5 mg/GAE/L−1 of milk, which was substantially higher than that obtained with the conventional diet ( x ¯ = 159.4 mg/GAE/L−1). A similar trend was observed in antioxidant activity, with the same formulation reaching 61.8 µM/FeSO4/100 mL−1, while the conventional diet did not exhibit detectable antioxidant capacity. Based on these findings, this study proposes the strategic use of native species during important periods of the production cycle to reduce or eliminate dependence on cereals such as soybean meal or forage legumes such as Medicago sativa, which are often expensive or unavailable in certain regions due to market demand [5,79].

4.4. Phytochemical Profile

Plant species of the Fabaceae family are recognized for their broad spectrum of biological activity, which has led to the therapeutic use of more than 500 species worldwide [80]. In this context, species within the Vachellia genus exhibit potent antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antitumor, antiparasitic, cytotoxic, immunomodulatory, hepatoprotective, gastroprotective, and insecticidal properties [81,82]. Specifically, methanolic extracts of Vachellia rigidula have demonstrated fungicidal activity against Candida parapsilosis [83]. These extracts have also been used as stabilizing agents for silver nanoparticles, targeting drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria in vivo [84]. Similarly, Cavazos et al. (2021) [77] reported that the presence of phenols, flavonoids, saponins, terpenes, and tannins in Vachellia rigidula extracts confers significant antibacterial activity against Providencia alcalifaciens (p < 0.001), Enterococcus faecalis (p < 0.01), Staphylococcus aureus (p < 0.001), and Yersinia enterocolitica (p < 0.001).
The Vachellia species analyzed in this study are characterized by high levels of flavonoids (particularly catechin and quercetin), terpenoids, and phenolic acids [85]. The inclusion of Vachellia rigidula in feed formulations offers a promising nutraceutical strategy, particularly for young goats, due to their antioxidant compounds, capable of scavenging and neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) before they induce DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, or the onset of oxidative stress-related pathologies. Interestingly, Vachellia rigidula extracts are also used as active ingredients in human dietary supplements marketed for weight management. This effect is attributed to its phenethylamine content, which has been associated with stimulant, appetite-suppressing, thermogenic, and weight-reducing effects [86,87]. Therefore, the inclusion of Vachellia rigidula in the diet of young goats should be carefully evaluated to ensure that it does not negatively affect weight gain or other zootechnical parameters. Therefore, the selection of appropriate extraction methods and solvents is essential not only to maximize the yield of bioactive compounds but also to accurately assess their biological activity [88]. Similarly, Havardia spp. belongs to the Fabaceae family, and certain species of this genus (e.g., H. albicans) have been explored as anthelmintic alternatives due to their content of secondary metabolites such as condensed tannins, flavonoids, and saponins [89]. These compounds exert antiparasitic effects by altering energy metabolism, impairing metamorphosis, inducing non-locomotor dysfunctions, and causing epidermal damage in gastrointestinal parasites [90]. In this context, Torres-Fajardo et al. (2021) [53] reported a potent anthelmintic activity of H. albicans extracts against Haemonchus contortus throughout its developmental stages (egg, larva, and adult). Regarding the nutritional aspect, Castañeda-Ramírez et al. (2018) [91] reported that Havardia species can provide adequate values for ruminant feeding, including a crude protein content greater than 10%, metabolizable energy greater than 2.9 MJ/kg−1 DM, and a wide range of condensed tannin concentrations (1.0–37.6%). However, Galicia-Aguilar et al. (2012) [92] observed lower dry matter digestibility in lambs fed diets containing these shrubs. Similarly, Sandoval-Pelcastre et al. (2020) [93] reported that the tannins present in these legumes negatively affect cellulolytic bacteria, thus limiting the anaerobic fermentation of carbohydrates into volatile fatty acids and reducing the production of CO2 and H2, essential for methanogenesis [94]. Havardia pallens is currently being investigated as a potential forage resource, despite its historically low nutritional profile and limited use in ruminant diets [95]. The present study contributes valuable data on the chemical composition of this species, supporting future research aimed at accurately quantifying its secondary compounds, mineral content, and functional compounds, to assess its long-term sustainability for animal or even human consumption. Future research should consider the phytochemical dynamics of Havardia pallens throughout its phenological stages, as well as the influence of biotic and abiotic factors, to gain a comprehensive understanding of its nutritional potential and functional value. The plant species characterized in the present experiment and added to a grain-based diet, present nutritional chemical characteristics to be used in animal feed, adding them to these diets showed to provide them with in vitro properties that could affect the animals that consume them such as spermatogenesis, lactation, meat quality, immune system, blood cell production [72,96,97,98,99] so the next step to take and which is the limitation of our work, is to test them (in vivo) in growing male goats. However, within the methodology for determining whether a food has nutraceutical characteristics, the first step is an agronomic and in vitro study before it is used in animals [53].

5. Conclusions

The present study provides evidence that native leguminous shrubs such as Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens, traditionally available in the thorn scrub ecosystem of northeastern Mexico, possess significant nutraceutical potential when incorporated into functional diets for goats. The bromatological analysis revealed that Vachellia rigidula exhibited the highest values of acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin, which may initially suggest a lower digestibility; however, its exceptional content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity, particularly in aqueous and methanolic extractions, highlights its role as a functional additive capable of mitigating oxidative stress and improving animal health.
The phenolic and flavonoid concentrations observed in Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens, though moderate when compared to other species such as Moringa oleifera, were sufficient to impart bioactivity in formulated diets. In particular, the DVR formulation (based on V. rigidula) showed significantly higher antioxidant capacity than both the DHP and DME diets, reinforcing the value of this species as a functional feed component. Moreover, the presence of secondary metabolites in these native legumes contributes not only to antioxidative functions but also to antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anthelmintic properties previously documented in the literature.
From a zootechnical standpoint, the inclusion of Vachellia rigidula and Havardia pallens in goat diets represents a sustainable and regionally adaptable strategy, especially in semi-arid areas where conventional forages like Medicago sativa may be economically or ecologically limiting. The potential of Vachellia rigidula to influence weight gain must be carefully assessed due to its known content of phenethylamines, which are associated with thermogenic and appetite-suppressant effects in humans. Therefore, further research is required to evaluate its long-term impact on animal performance, metabolism, and reproductive parameters.
In conclusion, the findings of this study support the integration of native leguminous shrubs into caprine feeding systems as functional and nutraceutical resources. Future research should aim to deepen the characterization of their phytochemical profiles across different phenological stages and assess the bioavailability and physiological effects of their bioactive compounds in vivo. Such work would contribute to optimizing their inclusion in livestock nutrition and to advancing sustainable animal production systems in marginal environments.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, reviewing and editing, and supervision, J.H.R.-F.; conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, C.C.Z.-C.; methodology, investigation, visualization, and supervision, J.A.T.-C., D.L.-A. and J.A.N.-C., L.E.C.-B., F.E.O.-S., F.S.-D., A.I.L.-R. and J.A.G.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are presented in the tables in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia for their assistance in animal feeding and sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
GAEGallic acid equivalent
TETrollox equivalents
mmolMillimole
MgMilligram
gGram
kgKilogram
RP-HPLC-ESI-MSReverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
CPCrude protein
NDFNeutral detergent fiber
ADFAcid detergent fiber
NNorth
WWest
°CCentigrade degrees
mmMilimeters
mMeters
DMDry matter
Co.Company
USAUnited States of America
mLMilliliter
minMinutes
No.Number
rpmRevolutions per minute
v/vvolume/volume
µLMicroliter
nmNanometers
QEQuercetin equivalents
Fe+3Ferric iron
Fe+2Ferrous
FRAPFerric reducing antioxidant power
pHHydrogen potential
TPTZ2,4,6-TRI (2-Pyridil) -1,3,5-triazine
mMMolar mass
HClHydrochloric acid
FeCl3Iron chloride
µmMillionth of mol
[M-H] (m/z)mass
kVKilovolt
VVolts
hhour
SEMStanDVRd error of mean
RTRetention time
PRPsProduction of salivary proline-rich proteins
ROSReactive oxygen species
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
MJMegajoules
CO2Carbon dioxide
H2Hydrogen

References

  1. Pérez-Escamilla, R.; Salles-Costa, R.; Segall-Corrêa, A.M. Food insecurity experience-based scales and food security governance: A case study from Brazil. Glob. Food Secur. 2024, 41, 100766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rout, P.K.; Behera, B.K. Goat and sheep farming. In Sustainability in Ruminant Livestock; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taniguchi, M. Utilizing Indigenous Animal Genetic Resources—Based on research into indigenous cattle breeds in the Basque Country in Northern Spain and indigenous pig breeds in Vietnam. Anim. Sci. J. 2025, 96, e70046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Babatunde, O.O.; Park, C.S.; Adeola, O. Nutritional potentials of atypical feed ingredients for broiler chickens and pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rivas-Jacobo, M.A.; Herrera-Haro, J.G.; Hernández-Garay, A.; Vaquera-Huerta, H.; Alejos De La Fuente, J.I.; Cadena-Villegas, S. Yield of five alfalfa varieties during four years of evaluation. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 2020, 11, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kazemi, M. An investigation on chemical/mineral compositions, ruminal microbial fermentation, and feeding value of some leaves as alternative forages for finishing goats during the dry season. AMB Express 2021, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ramirez, R.G.; Ledezma-Torres, R.A. Forage utilization from native shrubs Vachellia rigidula and Vachellia farnesiana by goats and sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 1997, 25, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ngangyo Heya, M.; Maiti, R.; Pournavab, R.F.; Carrillo-Parra, A.; Heya, M.N.; Pournavab, R.F.; Salas Cruz, L.R. Timber-yielding plants of the Tamaulipan thorn scrub: Forest, fodder, and bioenergy potential. In Biology, Productivity and Bioenergy of Timber-Yielding Plants: An Experimental Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Foroughbakhch, R.; Hernández-Piñero, J.L.; Carrillo-Parra, A.; Rocha-Estrada, A. Composition and animal preference for plants used for goat feeding in semiarid Northeastern Mexico. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2013, 23, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zapata-Campos, C.C.; Mellado-Bosque, M.A. The goat: Selection and consumption habits of native plants in arid pastures. CienciaUAT 2021, 15, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). Geography and Environment; INEGI: Aguascalientes, Mexico, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch carbohydrates in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, C.C.; Yang, M.H.; Wen, H.M.; Chern, J.C. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J. Food Drug Anal. 2002, 10, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taga, M.S.; Miller, E.E.; Pratt, D.E. Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1984, 61, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brand, W.; Cuvelier, M.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.F.; Buenrostro, J.J.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. The complete biodegradation pathway of ellagitannins by Aspergillus niger in solid-state fermentation. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cerda-Cejudo, N.D.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J.; Sepúlveda, L.; Torres-Leon, C.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N. Recovery of ellagic acid from Mexican rambutan peel by solid-state fermentation-assisted extraction. Food Bioprod. Process 2022, 134, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nardi, M.; Baldelli, S.; Ciriolo, M.R.; Costanzo, P.; Procopio, A.; Colica, C. Oleuropein aglycone peracetylated (3,4-DHPEA-EA(P)) attenuates H2O2-mediated cytotoxicity in C2C12 myocytes via inactivation of p-JNK/p-c-Jun signaling pathway. Molecules 2020, 25, 5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Saba, E.; Lee, Y.S.; Yang, W.K.; Lee, Y.Y.; Kim, M.; Woo, S.M.; Kim, K.; Kwon, Y.S.; Kim, T.H.; Kwak, D.; et al. Effects of an herbal formulation, KGC3P, and its individual component, nepetin, on coal fly dust-induced airway inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, B. LC-MS Identification of Proanthocyanidins in Bark and Fruit of six Terminalia species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018, 13, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, J.; Huang, X.; Ma, G. Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of extract and components of herbs in East Asia. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 29197–29213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Syarafina, Z.Y.I.; Safithri, M.; Bintang, M.; Kurniasih, R. In silico screening of cinnamon (Cinnamomum burmannii) bioactive compounds as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Kim. Sains Apl. 2022, 25, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Isemura, M. Catechin in human health and disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gómez-Martínez, M.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; González-Domínguez, J.; Gómez-Martínez, S.; Aguilar, C.N.; Morlett-Chávez, J.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R. Location and tissue effects on phytochemical composition and in vitro antioxidant activity of Moringa oleifera. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 151, 112439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elloumi, W.; Mahmoudi, A.; Ortiz, S.; Boutefnouchet, S.; Chamkha, M.; Sayadi, S. Wound healing potential of quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside and myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside isolated from Pistacia lentiscus distilled leaves in rats model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hikal, W.M.; Baeshen, R.S.; Said-Al-Ahl, H.A.H. Botanical insecticide as simple extractives for pest control. Cogent Biol. 2017, 3, 1404274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Punia, A.; Singh, V.; Thakur, A.; Chauhan, N.S. Impact of caffeic acid on growth, development and biochemical physiology of insect pest, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Heliyon 2023, 9, e14593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, M.; Firrman, J.; Liu, L.; Yam, K. A review on flavonoid apigenin: Dietary intake, ADME, antimicrobial effects, and interactions with human gut microbiota. Biomed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 7010467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaur, A.; Sohal, S.K.; Arora, S.; Kaur, H. Bio-efficacy of Vachellia auriculiformis against Bactrocera cucurbitae. In Recent Research Advances in Biology; Book Publisher International (SCIENCEDOMAIN): Istanbul, Turkey, 2021; Volume 9, pp. 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  33. Qu, Z.; Liu, A.; Li, P.; Liu, C.; Xiao, W.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S. Advances in physiological functions and mechanisms of (−)-epicatechin. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 211–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gupta, G.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Khan, M.M.; Ajmal, M.; Ahsan, R.; Rahaman, M.A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Arshad, M.; Khushtar, M. Current pharmacological trends on Myricetin. Drug Res. 2020, 70, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taheri, Y.; Suleria, H.A.R.; Martins, N.; Sytar, O.; Beyatli, A.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Seitimova, G.; Salehi, B.; Semwal, P.; Painuli, S.; et al. Myricetin bioactive effects: Moving from preclinical evidence to potential clinical applications. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Szczepańska, J.; Barba, F.J.; Skąpska, S.; Marszałek, K. High pressure processing of carrot juice: Effect of static and multi-pulsed pressure on the polyphenolic profile, oxidoreductases activity and colour. Food Chem. 2020, 307, 125549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han-Jie, L.; Jantan, I.; Yusoff, S.D.; Jalil, J.; Husain, K. Sinensetin: An insight on its pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action and toxicity. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 553404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, H.H.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, J.; Jung, S.H.; Lee, K. Characterization of caffeoylquinic acids from Lepisorus thunbergianus and their melanogenesis inhibitory activity. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 30946–30955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yao, L.; Liu, W.; Bashir, M.; Nisar, M.F.; Wan, C.C. Eriocitrin: A review of pharmacological effects. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 154, 113563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Giglio, R.V.; Patti, A.M.; Nikolic, D.; Li-Volti, G.; Al-Rasadi, K.; Katsiki, N.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Montalto, G.; Ivanova, E.; Orekhov, A.N.; et al. The effect of bergamot on dyslipidemia. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El-Nakhel, C.; Pannico, A.; Graziani, G.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Giordano, M.; Ritieni, A.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Variation in macronutrient content, phytochemical constitution and in vitro antioxidant capacity of green and red butterhead lettuce dictated by different developmental stages of harvest maturity. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Drioiche, A.; Ailli, A.; Remok, F.; Saidi, S.; Gourich, A.A.; Asbabou, A.; Zair, T. Analysis of the chemical composition and evaluation of the antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticoagulant, and antidiabetic properties of Pistacia lentiscus from Boulemane as a natural nutraceutical preservative. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, F.; Tong, L.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; He, H.; Xu, R.; Ma, Y.; Huang, C. Neuroprotective effects of anthocyanins and its major component cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) in the central nervous system: An outlined review. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 858, 172500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Delgado-Pertíñez, M.A.; Horcada, M.A. Better Animal Feeding for Improving the Quality of Ruminant Meat and Dairy. Foods 2021, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ponnampalam, E.N.; Priyashantha, H.; Vidanarachchi, J.K.; Kiani, A.; Holman, B.W. Effects of nutritional factors on fat content, fatty acid composition, and sensorial properties of meat and milk from domesticated ruminants: An overview. Animals 2024, 14, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Quijada, J.; Chan-Perez, I.; Dakheel, M.M.; Kommuru, D.S.; Terrill, T.H. Interactions between nutrition and infections with Haemonchus contortus and related gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 239–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tracy, B.; Fike, J.; Brennan, K.; Blackmon, T.; Kaur, S. Evaluation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) to improve animal performance in a tall fescue-based grazing system. Agronomy 2022, 12, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramirez, R.G.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, H.; Gomez-Mesa, M.V.; Perez-Rodriguez, M.A. Feed value of foliage from Vachellia rigidula, Vachellia berlandieri and Vachellia farnesiana. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 1999, 16, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ramírez-Lozano, R.G. Nutritional Characteristics of Browse Species from Northeastern Mexico Consumed by Small Ruminants. BSAP Occas. Publ. 2006, 34, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ramírez-Orduña, R.; Ramírez-Lozano, R.G.; López-Gutiérrez, F. Factores Estructurales de la Pared Celular del Forraje que Afectan su Digestibilidad. Ciencia UANL 5.2. 2002. Available online: http://eprints.uanl.mx/id/eprint/1175 (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  51. El-Sabrout, K.; Khalifah, A.; Mishra, B. Application of Botanical Products as Nutraceutical Feed Additives for Improving Poultry Health and Production. Vet. World 2023, 16, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mani-López, E.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A. Legume proteins, peptides, water extracts, and crude protein extracts as antifungals for food applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Torres-Fajardo, R.A.; González-Pech, P.G.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A. Nutraceutical potential of the low deciduous forest to improve small ruminant nutrition and health: A systematic review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Goetsch, A.L. Recent advances in the feeding and nutrition of dairy goats. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mellado, M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Arevalo, J.R.; Rodríguez, A.; García, J.E.; Mellado, J. Selection for nutrients by pregnant goats on a microphyll desert scrub. Animal 2011, 5, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gaytán, L.; Salem, A.F.Z.; Rodríguez, A.; García, J.E.; Arévalo, J.R.; Mellado, M. Age and season effects on quality of diets selected by Criollo crossbred goats on rangeland. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gholve, A.U.; Deshpande, K.Y.; Munde, V.K.; Amurtkar, S.A.; Sonale, P.D.; Naitam, N.D. Effect of partial replacement of concentrate mixture by Sesbania (Sesbania sesban) on nutrient utilization, growth performance, blood metabolites and economics of production in growing Osmanabadi goats. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 2021, 21, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schmitt, M.H.; Ward, D.; Shrader, A.M. Salivary tannin-binding proteins: A foraging advantage for goats? Livest. Sci. 2020, 234, 103974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lu, C.D. The role of goats in the world: Society, science, and sustainability. Small Rumin. Res. 2023, 227, 107056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Villalba, J.J.; Spackman, C.; Goff, B.M.; Klotz, J.L.; Griggs, T.; MacAdam, J.W. Interaction between a tannin-containing legume and endophyte-infected tall fescue seed on lambs’ feeding behavior and physiology. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Makkar, H.P. Measurement of total phenolics and tannins using Folin-Ciocalteu method. In Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vinogradova, N.; Vinogradova, E.; Chaplygin, V.; Mandzhieva, S.; Kumar, P.; Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Seth, C.S.; Buracesvskaya, M.; Lysenko, D.; et al. Phenolic compounds of the medicinal plants in an anthropogenically transformed environment. Molecules 2023, 28, 6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bhat, T.K.; Kannan, A.; Singh, B.; Sharma, O.P. Value addition of feed and fodder by alleviating the antinutritional effects of tannins. Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kolesnik, N.S.; Bogolyubova, N.V.; Zelenchenkova, A.A. The effect of different classes of tannins on methanogenesis in ruminants. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol. [Agric. Biol.] 2024, 59, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kadigi, J.H.; Bashiri, I.; Schreiber, S. Potential benefits of tannins on ruminant health, production and environmental sustainability. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf. 2024, 16, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Villalba, J.J.; Ramsey, R.D.; Athanasiadou, S. Herbivory and the power of phytochemical diversity on animal health. Animal 2024, 101287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Delgadillo-Puga, C.; Cuchillo-Hilario, M.; León-Ortiz, L.; Ramírez-Rodríguez, A.; Cabiddu, A.; Navarro-Ocaña, A.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J. Goats’ feeding supplementation with Acacia farnesiana pods and their relationship with milk composition: Fatty acids, polyphenols, and antioxidant activity. Animals 2019, 9, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abdulrazak, S.A.; Fujihara, T.; Ondiek, J.K.; Ørskov, E.R. Nutritive evaluation of some Vachellia tree leaves from Kenya. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000, 85, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, P.P.; Kumaravel, S.; Lalitha, C. Screening of antioxidant activity, total phenolics and GC-MS study of Vitex negundo. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2010, 4, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  70. Arenaz, P. Total Flavonoid Content, Total Phenolic Content, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Acacia Rigidula Leaf Extracts. Theses and Dissertations. 169. 2021. Available online: https://rio.tamiu.edu/etds/169 (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  71. Elshamy, S.; Handoussa, H.; El-Shazly, M.; Mohammed, E.D.; Kuhnert, N. Metabolomic profiling and quantification of polyphenols from leaves of seven Acacia species by UHPLC-QTOF-ESI-MS. Fitoterapia 2024, 172, 105741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Delgadillo-Puga, C.; Cuchillo-Hilario, M. Reviewing the benefits of grazing/browsing semiarid rangeland feed resources and the transference of bioactivity and pro-healthy properties to goat milk and cheese: Obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation and hepatic steatosis prevention. Animals 2021, 11, 2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Huynh, T.T.H.; Wongmaneepratip, W.; Vangnai, K. Relationship between flavonoid chemical structures and their antioxidant capacity in preventing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formation in heated meat model system. Foods 2024, 13, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Adelakun, A.O.; Fasalejo, O.F.; Offiah, C.J.; Adebusuyi, T.S. Determination of antioxidants and nutritional compositions of the flower, leaf and seed of Moringa oleifera Lam. Plants Environ. 2019, 1, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  75. Deuri, P.; Sood, N.; Wadhwa, M.; Bakshi, M.P.S.; Salem, A.Z.M. Screening of tree leaves for bioactive components and their impact on in vitro fermentability and methane production from total mixed ration. Agrofor. Syst. 2020, 94, 1455–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Smigielski, L.; Laubach, E.; Pesch, L.; Glock, J.M.L.; Albrecht, F.; Slusarenko, A.; Panstruga, R.; Kuhn, H. Nodulation induces systemic resistance of Medicago truncatula and Pisum sativum against Erysiphe pisi and primes for powdery mildew-triggered salicylic acid accumulation. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cavazos, P.; Gonzalez, D.; Lanorio, J.; Ynalvez, R. SeconDVRy metabolites, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of the leaf extracts of Vachellia rigidula Benth. and Vachellia berlandieri Benth. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Al-Snafi, A.E.; Khadem, H.S.; Al-Saedy, H.A.; Alqahtani, A.M.; El-Saber, G. A review on Medicago sativa: A potential medicinal plant. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Sci. Arch. 2021, 1, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Srisaikham, S. A comparison of nutritional values, bioactive compounds, amino acids, and antioxidant activities of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plant and pellet for use as beneficial material ruminant feed. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 10312–10316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Usman, M.; Khan, W.R.; Yousaf, N.; Akram, S.; Murtaza, G.; Kudus, K.A.; Ditta, A.; Rosli, Z.; Rajpar, M.N.; Nazre, M. Exploring the phytochemicals and anti-cancer potential of the members of Fabaceae family: A comprehensive review. Molecules 2022, 27, 3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sebastian, R.; Jaykar, B.; Gomathi, V. Current status of anticancer research in Fabaceae family. Pharma Innov. 2020, 9, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Shah, Y.A.; Altoubi, H.W.K.; Kotta, S.; Sharma, P.; Anwer, M.K.; Kaithavalappil, D.S.; Koca, E.; Aydemir, L.Y. Fabrication, characterization, and antioxidant potential of sodium alginate/Vachellia gum hydrogel-based films loaded with cinnamon essential oil. Gels 2023, 9, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Alanís-Garza, B.A.; Arroyo, J.L.; González, G.G.; González, E.G.; De Torres, N.W.; Aranda, R.S. Anti-fungal and anti-mycobacterial activity of plants of Nuevo Leon Mexico. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  84. Escárcega-González, C.E.; Garza-Cervantes, J.A.; Vázquez-Rodríguez, A.; Montelongo-Peralta, L.Z.; Treviño-González, M.T.; Castro, E.D.B.; Saucedo-Salazar, E.M.; Morales, R.M.C.; Regalado-Soto, D.I.; Treviño-González, F.M.; et al. In vivo antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles produced via a green chemistry synthesis using Vachellia rigidula as a reducing and capping agent. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2349–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Madjid, A.M.O.; Sanni, A.; Lagnika, L. Chemical diversity and pharmacological properties of genus Vachellia. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2020, 13, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pawar, R.S.; Grundel, E.; Fardin-Kia, A.R.; Rader, J.I. Determination of selected biogenic amines in Vachellia rigidula plant materials and dietary supplements using LC-MS/MS methods. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 88, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lin, H.Y.; Chang, T.C.; Chang, S.T. A review of antioxidant and pharmacological properties of phenolic compounds in Vachellia confuse. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2018, 8, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gorlenko, C.L.; Kiselev, H.Y.; Budanova, E.V.; Zamyatnin, A.A.; Ikryannikova, L.N. Plant seconDVRy metabolites in the battle of drugs and drug-resistant bacteria: New heroes or worse clones of antibiotics? Antibiotics 2020, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Castillo-Mitre, G.F.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; González-Cortazar, M.; Mendoza-de Gives, P.; Hernández-Beteta, E.E.; Reyes-Guerrero, D.E.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Vazquez-Armijo, J.F.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; et al. Caffeoyl and coumaroyl derivatives from Vachellia cochliacantha exhibit ovicidal activity against Haemonchus contortus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 204, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ampode, K. Plant seconDVRy compounds as an alternative anthelmintic in mitigating gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants: A review. Int. J. Biosci. 2019, 14, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Castañeda-Ramírez, G.S.; Rodríguez-Labastida, M.; Ortiz-Ocampo, G.I.; González-Pech, P.G.; Ventura-Cordero, J.; Borges-Argáez, R.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Mathieu, C. An in vitro approach to evaluate the nutraceutical value of plant foliage against Haemonchus contortus. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 3979–3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Galicia-Aguilar, H.; Rodríguez-González, L.; Capetillo-Leal, C.; Cámara-Sarmiento, R.; Aguilar-Caballero, A.; Sandoval-Castro, C.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J. Effects of Havardia albicans supplementation on feed consumption and dry matter digestibility of sheep and the biology of Haemonchus contortus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sandoval-Pelcastre, A.A.; Ramirez-Mella, M.; Rodríguez-Ávila, N.L.; Candelaria-Martinez, B. Tropical trees and shrubs with potential to decrease methane production in ruminants. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 2020, 23, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Patra, A.K.; Saxena, J. A new perspective on the use of plant seconDVRy metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1198–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Estrada-Castillón, E.; Villarreal-Quintanilla, J.Á.; Rodríguez-Salinas, M.M.; Encinas-Domínguez, J.A.; González-Rodríguez, H.; Figueroa, G.R.; Arévalo, J.R. Ethnobotanical survey of useful species in Bustamante, Nuevo León, Mexico. Hum. Ecol. 2018, 46, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Muhammad, S.; Hariyono, D. The beneficial impact of legume supplementation on nutrient intake, digestibility, growth and reproductive performance of goats: A brief review. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2025, 15, 148–152. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ganai, I.A.; Sharma, R.K.; Pathak, A.K.; Khan, N.; Rastogi, A.; Sahib, Q.S. Effect of dietary utilization of a mixture of tropical tree foliage leaves on growth performance, nutrient utilization, blood biochemistry, and immune status of goats. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2025, 57, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mierlita, D.; Mierlita, S.; Struti, D.I.; Mintas, O.S. Effects of hemp seed on the production, fatty acid profile, and antioxidant capacity of milk from goats fed hay or a mixed shrubs–grass rangeland. Animals 2023, 13, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Neha, A.; Shaik, A.; Chelkapally, S.C.; Kolikapongu, R.S.; Namani, S.C.; Erukulla, T.; Batchu, P.; Mendez, N.; Smith, Y.; Brown, D.; et al. Effect of feeding a blackseed meal-sericea lespedeza leaf meal pellet on gastrointestinal nematode and coccidia infection and animal performance in young goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2024, 331, 110253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Diets formulated with V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa.
Table 1. Diets formulated with V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa.
Ingredient (%)DMEDVRDHP
M. sativa35--
V. rigidula-35-
H. Pallens--35
Ground sorghum353535
Sorghum straw141414
Molasses 777
Soybean meal888
Minerals111
Salt0.100.100.10
Total 100100100
DME: diet with M. sativa; DVR: diet with V. rigidula; DHP: diet with H. pallens.
Table 2. Nutrient content (%) of two native species (V. rigidula, H. pallens) and a forage legume (M. sativa) and of diets prepared with these species.
Table 2. Nutrient content (%) of two native species (V. rigidula, H. pallens) and a forage legume (M. sativa) and of diets prepared with these species.
PlantADFNDFCPASHLignin
H. pallens31.43 ± 4.75 ab48.3 ± 3.05 a20.67 ± 1.69 ab7.39 ± 0.37 c9.91 ± 1.03 b
V. rigidula40.48 ± 4.71 a49.72 ± 7.90 a12.84 ± 2.21 c5.92 ± 0.70 c21.4 ± 3.43 a
M. sativa24.44 ± 1.81 bc46.73 ± 6.21 ab22.66 ± 2.13 a8.3 ± 2.08 bc8.70 ± 0.61 b
DVR21.18 ± 0.54 bc37.47 ± 0.90 bc13.4 ± 0.05 c10.15 ± 0.02 ab*
DHP14.86 ± 0.25 c31.54 ± 1.28 c14.25 ± 0.35 c11.33 ± 0.10 a*
DME15.81 ± 0.36 c31.38 ± 0.17 c16.7 ± 0.01 bc11.86 ± 0.09 a*
ADF: acid detergent fiber; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; CP: crude protein; DVR: diet with V. rigidula; DHP: diet with H. pallens; DME: diet with M. sativa. * Lignin content not measured in diets. Means with the same letter do not differ statistically (Tukey p < 0.05).
Table 3. Total phenols and flavonoids in V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa.
Table 3. Total phenols and flavonoids in V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa.
Type of ExtractionPhenols (mg/GAE/g−1)Flavonoids (mg/QE/g−1)
V. rigidula aqueous extraction18.22 ± 0.11 a1.16 ± 0.0049
H. pallens aqueous extraction11.23 ± 0.02 abc0.88 ± 0.0048
M. sativa aqueous extraction8.68 ± 0.03 bc9.422 ± 0.4833
V. rigidula methanolic extraction16.82 ± 0.29 ab0.295 ± 0.0119
H. pallens methanolic extraction8.16 ± 0.09 bc0.302 ± 0.0047
M. sativa methanolic extraction7.61 ± 0.10 c1.285 ± 0.0124
V. rigidula ethanolic extraction17.04 ± 0.08 ab0.311 ± 0.0049
H. pallens ethanolic extraction9.59 ± 0.05 abc0.336 ± 0.0019
M. sativa ethanolic extraction7.61 ± 0.10 c1.260 ± 0.01
GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent. Means with the same letter within each column do not differ statistically (Tukey p < 0.05).
Table 4. Concentration of total phenols (g/GAE/g−1), total flavonoids (g/QE/kg−1) in diets formulated with two native species (V. rigidula and H. pallens) and a forage legume (M. sativa).
Table 4. Concentration of total phenols (g/GAE/g−1), total flavonoids (g/QE/kg−1) in diets formulated with two native species (V. rigidula and H. pallens) and a forage legume (M. sativa).
Secondary CompoundsDMEDVRDHPSEMp-Value
Phenols22 b57 a47 a0.006 0.007
Flavonoids210 ab230 a180 b0.0080.005
DME: Medicago sativa, DVR: Vachellia rigidula; DHP: Harvardia pallens; SEM: Standard error of the mean, GAE: Gallic acid equivalent, QE: Quercetin equivalent. Means with the same letter within each column do not differ statistically (Tukey p < 0.05).
Table 5. Antioxidative capacity.
Table 5. Antioxidative capacity.
SpeciesAntioxidative Capacity (μmol/L /TE/g−1)
V. rigidula144,711.53 ± 10,442.87 a
H. pallens16,800.21 ± 1287.84 b
M. sativa11,701.92 ± 319.16 b
TE: Trolox equivalent; mmol: millimoles. Means with the same letter within each column do not differ statistically (Tukey p < 0.05).
Table 6. Antioxidant capacity of diets formulated with V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa and without inclusion.
Table 6. Antioxidant capacity of diets formulated with V. rigidula, H. pallens, and M. sativa and without inclusion.
Type of Extraction by Speciesμmol/ET/g−1
DVR aqueous extraction147,966.66 ± 10,315.38 a
DHP aqueous extraction17,949.30 ± 1441.13 b
DME aqueous extraction19,143.74 ± 2908.89 b
DVR methanol extraction139,847.44 ± 11,097.05 a
DHP methanol extraction10,591.66 ± 474.040 b
DME methanol extraction8206.24 ± 1460.67 b
Mixture without V. rigidula aqueous extraction9204.06 ± 978.95 b
Mixture without H. pallens aqueous extraction8154.91 ± 481.25 b
Mixture without M. sativa aqueous extraction9204.06 ± 978.95 b
Mixture without V. rigidula methanol extraction9159.19 ± 25.90 b
Mixture without H. pallens methanol extraction7772.43 ± 381.45 b
Mixture without M. sativa methanol extraction9159.18 ± 25.90 b
DME: diet with M. sativa; DVR: diet with V. rigidula; DHP: diet with H. pallens; ET: Trolox equivalent; Means with the same letter within each column do not differ statistically (Tukey p < 0.05).
Table 7. V. rigidula phytochemical identification through HPLC-ESI-MS.
Table 7. V. rigidula phytochemical identification through HPLC-ESI-MS.
RT (min)[M-H]-(m/z)CompoundsSolventFamilyEffectsReference
5.369376.83,4-DHPEA-EAA, E, MTyrosolsAntioxidant[21]
18.417314.9NepetinA, E, MMethoxyflavonesAntibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic[22]
22.852576.8Procyanidin dimer B1AProanthocyanidin dimersAntioxidant, antimicrobial, anthelmintic, anti-inflammatory, gastro-protective, and insecticidal activities.[23]
23.893386.9Medioresinol(A)LignansPotential for AChE inhibition and antimicrobial[24,25]
25.567288.9(+)-CatechinA, E, MCatechinsAntioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-acne, anthelmintic, anti-inflammatory, gastro-protective, and insecticidal activities.[26]
27.847562.8Apigenin arabinoside-glucosideA, E, MFlavonesAntioxidant[27]
31.107462.8Myricetin 3-O-rhamnosideA, E, MFlavonolsAntioxidant, antifungal, antimicrobial.[28]
34.75446.8Luteolin 6-C-glucosideA, E, MFlavonesInsecticide (pests by influencing their behavior, growth, and development)[29]
7.827340.8Caffeic acid 4-O-glucosideEHydroxycinnamic acidsAntioxidant (anti-melanogenesis and anti-tyrosinase), insecticide[30]
18.747592.7Apigenin 6,8-di-C-glucosideEFlavonesAntioxidant, anti-cancer and insecticide[31,32]
21.758288.8(−)-EpicatechinECatechinsAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antidiabetic, cardio and neuroprotective.[33]
27.614562.8Apigenin galactoside-arabinosideMFlavonesAntioxidant[34]
RT: Retention time. [M-H] (m/z): mass. Solvent: (A) aqueous; (E) ethanol; (M) methanol.
Table 8. H. pallens phytochemical identification through HPLC-ESI-MS.
Table 8. H. pallens phytochemical identification through HPLC-ESI-MS.
RT (min)[M-H]-(m/z)CompoundsSolventFamilyEffectsReference
5.079316.8MyricetinAFlavonolsAntioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic.[34,35]
17.905354.8Ferulic acid 4-O-glucosideA, E, MMethoxycinnamic acidsAntioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, cardio, gastro and neuroprotective[36]
26.993370.8SinensetinAMethoxyflavonesAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anti-obesity, anti- dementia and vasorelaxant activities.[37]
34.851518.95,3′,4′-Trihydroxy-3-methoxy-6:7-methylenedioxyflavone 4′-O-glucuronideA, E, MMethoxyflavonolsAntioxidant[26]
6.405341Caffeic acid 4-O-glucosideA, E, MHydroxycinnamic acidsAntioxidant (anti-melanogenesis and anti-tyrosinase), insecticide[30,38]
38.99595EriocitrinA, E, MFlavanonesAntioxidant, antitumor, anti-allergic, antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory[39]
40.858595NeoriocitrinA, EFlavanonesAntioxidant[40]
24.596354.9Feruloyl glucoseMMethoxycinnamic acidsAntioxidant[41]
39.613463Myricetin 3-O-rhamnosideMFlavanonesAntioxidant, antifungal, antimicrobial.[42]
41.385505Peonidin 3-O-(6″-acetyl-glucoside)MFlavonolsAntioxidant, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory.[43]
RT: Retention time. [M-H] (m/z); mass. Solvent; (A); aqueos. (E); ethanol. (M); methanol.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reyna-Fuentes, J.H.; Zapata-Campos, C.C.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; López-Aguirre, D.; Núñez-Colima, J.A.; Cruz-Bacab, L.E.; Olazarán-Santibáñez, F.E.; Sánchez-Dávila, F.; Leal-Robles, A.I.; Granados-Montelongo, J.A. Nutraceutical Potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula in the Diet Formulation for Male Goat. Metabolites 2025, 15, 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070457

AMA Style

Reyna-Fuentes JH, Zapata-Campos CC, Torres-Castillo JA, López-Aguirre D, Núñez-Colima JA, Cruz-Bacab LE, Olazarán-Santibáñez FE, Sánchez-Dávila F, Leal-Robles AI, Granados-Montelongo JA. Nutraceutical Potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula in the Diet Formulation for Male Goat. Metabolites. 2025; 15(7):457. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reyna-Fuentes, Jesús Humberto, Cecilia Carmela Zapata-Campos, Jorge Ariel Torres-Castillo, Daniel López-Aguirre, Juan Antonio Núñez-Colima, Luis Eliezer Cruz-Bacab, Fabián Eliseo Olazarán-Santibáñez, Fernando Sánchez-Dávila, Aida Isabel Leal-Robles, and Juan Antonio Granados-Montelongo. 2025. "Nutraceutical Potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula in the Diet Formulation for Male Goat" Metabolites 15, no. 7: 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070457

APA Style

Reyna-Fuentes, J. H., Zapata-Campos, C. C., Torres-Castillo, J. A., López-Aguirre, D., Núñez-Colima, J. A., Cruz-Bacab, L. E., Olazarán-Santibáñez, F. E., Sánchez-Dávila, F., Leal-Robles, A. I., & Granados-Montelongo, J. A. (2025). Nutraceutical Potential of Havardia pallens and Vachellia rigidula in the Diet Formulation for Male Goat. Metabolites, 15(7), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop