Next Article in Journal
Impact of High-Pressure Processed Onion on Colonic Metabolism Using a Dynamic Gastrointestinal Digestion Simulator
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship among Agroclimatic Variables, Soil and Leaves Nutrient Status with the Yield and Main Composition of Kaffir Lime (Citrus hystrix DC) Leaves Essential Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background

by
Manuela Peukert
1,*,
Sebastian Zimmermann
1,
Björn Egert
2,
Christoph H. Weinert
2,
Thomas Schwarzmann
3 and
Dagmar A. Brüggemann
1
1
Department of Safety and Quality of Meat, Max Rubner-Institut, 95326 Kulmbach, Germany
2
Department of Quality and Safety of Fruit and Vegetables, Max Rubner-Institut, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
3
Staatsgut Schwarzenau, Leistungsprüfungsanstalt für Schweinezucht Schwarzenau (LPA), 97359 Schwarzenau, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2021, 11(5), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050261
Submission received: 27 March 2021 / Revised: 21 April 2021 / Accepted: 21 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate possible systematic effects in the basic underlying variability of individual metabolomic data. In this context, the extent of gender- and genotype-dependent differences reflected in the metabolic composition of three tissues in fattening pigs was determined. The 40 pigs belonged to the genotypes PIx(LWxGL) and PIxGL with gilts and boars, respectively. Blood and tissue samples from M. longissimus dorsi and liver were directly taken at the slaughtering plant and directed to GC × GC qMS metabolite analysis. Differences were observed for various metabolite classes like amino acids, fatty acids, sugars, or organic acids. Gender-specific differences were much more pronounced than genotype-related differences, which could be due to the close genetic relation of the fattening pigs. However, the metabolic dimorphism between gilts and boars was found to be genotype-dependent, and vice versa metabolic differences between genotypes were found to be gender-dependent. Most interestingly, integration into metabolic pathways revealed different patterns for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) usage in boars and gilts. We suppose a stronger N-recycling and increased energy metabolism in boars, whereas, in gilts, more N is presumably excreted and remaining carbon skeletons channeled into lipogenesis. Associations of metabolites to meat quality factors confirmed the applicability of metabolomics approaches for a better understanding about the impact of drivers (e.g., gender, age, breed) on physiological processes influencing meat quality. Due to the huge complexity of the drivers-traits-network, the derivation of independent biomarkers for meat quality prediction will hardly be possible.
Keywords: GC × GC qMS; blood; muscle; liver; pigs; meat quality GC × GC qMS; blood; muscle; liver; pigs; meat quality

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peukert, M.; Zimmermann, S.; Egert, B.; Weinert, C.H.; Schwarzmann, T.; Brüggemann, D.A. Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background. Metabolites 2021, 11, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050261

AMA Style

Peukert M, Zimmermann S, Egert B, Weinert CH, Schwarzmann T, Brüggemann DA. Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background. Metabolites. 2021; 11(5):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peukert, Manuela, Sebastian Zimmermann, Björn Egert, Christoph H. Weinert, Thomas Schwarzmann, and Dagmar A. Brüggemann. 2021. "Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background" Metabolites 11, no. 5: 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050261

APA Style

Peukert, M., Zimmermann, S., Egert, B., Weinert, C. H., Schwarzmann, T., & Brüggemann, D. A. (2021). Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background. Metabolites, 11(5), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop