Next Article in Journal
The Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Lipid Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D, Bone Metabolism, and Fracture Risk in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Equine In Vivo and In Vitro Derived Metabolites of the Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM) ACP-105 for Improved Doping Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Total vs. Bioavailable: Determining a Better 25(OH)D Index in Association with Bone Density and Muscle Mass in Postmenopausal Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D Metabolites and Sex Steroid Indices in Postmenopausal Women with and without Low Bone Mass

Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2021, 11(2), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020086
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 24 January 2021 / Accepted: 29 January 2021 / Published: 1 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism)

Abstract

:
While the independent roles of vitamin D and sex hormones in skeletal health are well established, the associations of vitamin D and its metabolites to sex hormones and their indices are less investigated. In this observational study, clinical information of 189 Saudi postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years old [N = 80 with normal bone mineral density (BMD), aged 53.3 ± 7.7 years with body mass index (BMI)= 34.1kg/m2 ± 5.8, and N = 109 with low BMD (T-score −1.0 to −2.5), aged 57.0 ± 8.2 years, BMI = 32.4kg/m2 ± 6.2] was extracted from an existing capital-wide osteoporosis registry in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data included were BMD scores, serum total 25(OH)D, sex hormones, and bone turnover markers which were measured using commercially available assays. Age- and BMI-adjusted comparisons revealed significantly higher parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels as well as significantly lower testosterone and bioavailable testosterone in the low BMD group than the normal BMD group (p-values 0.04, 0.02, and 0.03, respectively). Stepwise linear regression showed that circulating testosterone levels accounted for 9.7% and 8.9% of the variances perceived in bioavailable 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D, respectively (p < 0.01), independent of other sex hormones, sex hormone indices, and bone turnover markers. Our study suggests that androgens are significantly associated with non-conventional vitamin D metabolites and these associations may have clinical relevance in assessing risk for low BMD and osteoporosis in Arab postmenopausal women.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) has an established role in calcium homeostasis for optimal skeletal health. In recent decades and in the past year alone, scientific advances continue to provide accumulating evidence of the pleiotropic effects of 25(OH)D on overall human health and its associations with extra-skeletal functions and clinical conditions [1,2,3]. Vitamin D deficiency is affecting people globally and is deemed as a risk factor for many chronic diseases [4,5], especially osteoporosis in adults [6,7] and rickets in children [8]. While the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is blessed with ample sunlight year-round, 25(OH)D deficiency remains widespread in the population [9,10]. Furthermore, the prevalence of osteoporosis is at 34–39.5% for 50–80-year-old women and 21.4–30.7% in healthy men [11,12].
In humans, 85–90% of 25(OH)D is linked to vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), whereas the remaining 10–15% are linked to albumin and lipoproteins, and the rest of the <0.03% are considered free [13]. The sum of free and albumin-bound 25(OH)D represents bioavailable 25(OH)D which reflects the level of 25(OH)D that is readily accessible for cells or tissues [14]. In line with the “free-hormone hypothesis,” only the free-hormone fractions can go to cells and produce biological activates [15,16].
It has been established that skeletal health is largely influenced by endogenous sex hormones in both men and women, with estrogen levels largely dictating the extent of bone loss in women in both their reproductive and post-menopausal stages [17,18,19]. While testosterone, another sex hormone, also has significant, albeit indirect effects in bone health among men in particular, its low levels and associated risk in bone-related diseases such as osteoporosis are largely due to lesser substrate availability for the conversion of estradiol, which is the main bone health determinant in both sexes [18,20]. The carrier of these hormones, known as the sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), which is mainly produced by the liver, is bound to sex hormones for transport to the target cells where they exert their biological activities [21]. Like the sex hormones, SHBG levels have also been implicated in bone diseases, but mostly age-related and limited to select skeletal sites [22].
Despite the established independent relationships of vitamin D and sex hormones in human skeletal health, there are limited studies determining the associations of vitamin D and its metabolites to sex hormones and their indices. Such studies may shed light on which among the various vitamin D metabolites exert major influence on androgen physiology which can, in turn, translate to better risk assessment and management of patients having low bone density issues and associated osteoporosis risk. The present cross-sectional study aims to fill this gap and determine such associations among postmenopausal Arab women with or without established low bone density.

2. Results

The general characteristics of all 189 subjects with low bone mineral density (BMD) and normal BMD are given in Table 1. Low BMD was observed in 57.7% of participants. The low BMD group were significantly older and had significantly lower BMI than those with normal BMD (p values <0.001). Worthy to note was that the mean BMI in both groups fell in the obese range. Age- and BMI-adjusted comparisons revealed that the normal BMD group had a significantly earlier onset of menarche (p = 0.006), older age at first pregnancy (p = 0.005), and shorter duration of amenorrhea (p = 0.01) than those in the low BMD group. As expected, T-scores and BMD values were significantly higher in the normal BMD group than the low BMD group (adjusted p-values <0.001). No significant difference was observed in the mean duration of menopause after adjustments (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the hormonal profiles of participants according to BMD status. Unadjusted comparisons showed that the low BMD group had significantly higher 25(OH)D levels than the normal group (p < 0.001) as well as higher levels of PTH (p = 0.002), SHBG (p = 0.007), and FSH (p = 0.002). The normal BMD group on the other hand had significantly higher levels of testosterone (p = 0.002), estradiol (p = 0.02), free androgen index (FAI) (p = 0.002), free estradiol index (FEI) (p = 0.007), free testosterone (FT) (p = 0.003), and bioavailable testosterone (BT) (p = 0.003) than the low BMD group. The majority of the parameters lost statistical significance after age and BMI adjustments were done with the exceptions of PTH, being significantly higher in the low BMD group as compared to the normal group (p = 0.04), and having significantly lower testosterone (p = 0.02) and BT levels as well (p = 0.03) (Table 2).
Table 3 shows the age-and BMI-adjusted comparisons in bone turnover markers in both groups and revealed no significant differences with the exception of N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) which were observed to be modestly higher in the normal BMD group than the low BMD group at borderline significance (p = 0.05). The rest of the comparisons are found in Table 3.
Bivariate associations between vitamin D metabolites, sex hormones and bone turnover markers in all participants are presented in Table 4. No significant associations were seen between total 25(OH)D and all parameters of interest with the exception of FSH which had modest correlation (r = 0.17; p < 0.05).
Stepwise linear regression using the different vitamin D metabolites as dependent variables and sex hormones with bone turnover markers as independent variables revealed that testosterone (ng/mL) explained 9.7% and 8.9% of the variances perceived in bio-available 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D, respectively (p < 0.01). No significant predictor was seen in total 25(OH)D (not included in tables).

3. Discussion

The present study determined the associations of 25(OH) D metabolites with sex hormone indices as well as bone turnover markers among Arab postmenopausal women and found that sex hormones, testosterone in particular, are significantly associated with free and bio-available 25(OH)D but not with total 25(OH)D, independent of other metabolic markers assessed. Other findings indicated that in both normal and low BMD participants, both bioavailable and free 25(OH)D correlated inversely with SHBG and positively with other sex hormones including testosterone, bioavailable testosterone (BT), free testosterone (FT), estradiol, free androgen index (FAI), and free estradiol index (FEI). The correlation of 25(OH)D with BMD may in part be attributed to sex hormone levels that were also related to 25(OH)D metabolites. SHBG is a glycoprotein that binds sex steroids with high affinity, regulating their bioavailability and entry to target cells [21]. SHBG play a role in numerous diseases, containing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [22].
In our study, there is a significant inverse association between SHBG and both free and bioavailable 25(OH)D in both healthy and low BMD groups. Few studies examined this correlation in women, and only one study stated that there was a significant relationship between 25(OH)D deficiency and SHBG [23] This association, especially in the low BMD group, suggests an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis for people with high SHBG who also have low free and bioavailable 25(OH)D not total 25(OH)D. The mechanisms for this interaction are unclear. Generally, a high 25(OH)D level may reinforce the correlation with SHBG, either through increased androgen synthesis [24] or through independent pathophysiological mechanisms [25].
FSH is important in women’s ovarian functions and an inverse correlation between FSH and 25(OH)D suggests a reduction in primordial follicles which may lead to early menopause. As a result, low 25(OH)D levels may have opposing influences on ovarian reserve in postmenopausal women. It was found that 25(OH)D was inversely correlated to urinary FSH levels in post-menopausal women.
Pilz et al. found that 25(OH)D supplementation (3332 IU /day) for 1-year increased total, free, and bioavailable testosterone levels [24], though another study found that 25(OH)D supplementation was not related to increased testosterone levels [26]. In our study, we found a significant positive relationship of 25(OH)D with total, bioavailable, and free testosterone. Although both low total testosterone and low 25(OH)D levels can be signs of poor health status, there is a causal role between 25(OH)D and testosterone production. 25(OH)D exerts its influence on testicular Sertoli cells causing increased testosterone production.
Estradiol was positively associated with free and bioavailable 25(OH)D in both healthy and low BMD groups. Low estradiol level is one of the most important factors that cause low VDBP levels in older women. Our results suggest that high estradiol is associated with higher VDBP levels. High serum VDBP occurs only in post-menopausal women with high estradiol levels. This might suggest that the interaction of estrogen with 25(OH)D depends on DBP and menopausal status.
Another interesting finding in the present study was the significant correlation of 25(OH)D with FAI and FEI, signifying that 25(OH)D might play a part in androgen bioavailability in postmenopausal women. Prospective investigations may further shed light on the role of 25(OH)D in the bioavailability of androgens and its relation to BMD in postmenopausal women. The correlation between 25(OH)D and sex hormone in our study confirms the appropriateness of 25(OH)D supplementation in postmenopausal women as a stimulator of endogenous 25(OH)D production. Furthermore, our results acknowledge that 25(OH)D supplementation in postmenopausal women might have an effect on bone metabolism, as well as on other body functions related to sex hormones actions.
The authors acknowledge several limitations. The cross-sectional design limits the findings to being at best, suggestive, and therefore causality between the relationships between 25(OH)D bioavailability and sex hormones needs to be further investigated prospectively. Several major confounding variables for vitamin D such as season, sunlight exposure, intake of vitamin D supplements, and lifestyle were not taken into consideration and may affect the findings. The lack of information with respect to vitamin D intake is vital and may partially explain the higher 25(OH)D levels in the low BMD group, although previous observational studies from the same ethnic group demonstrate a significant positive association between age and vitamin D status among adults.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Subjects

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 189 Saudi postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years old (N = 80 healthy control, N = 109 with low BMD) were randomly selected from the existing osteoporosis registry of the Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases (CBCD) in King Saud University (KSU), Saudi Arabia. In brief, this registry is a capital-wide database involving more than 1500 participants from the outpatient clinics of King Fahd Medical City, King Salman Hospital, and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, whose BMD measurements were assessed and recorded between 2013 and 2016 [27,28]. A generalized questionnaire was used to collect participants’ history (age, medical history, disease status, etc.). Height, weight, and blood pressure were obtained from all patients. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m2).

4.2. Biochemical Analysis

Subjects were requested to visit their respective health centers after an overnight fast (≥ 10 h). Fasting blood samples were collected and serum extracted. Extracted serum was transferred to CBCD Biobank and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Serum 25(OH)D and sex hormones were measured using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). PTH was estimated by biochemical analyzer COBAS e411 (Roche Diagnostics) using commercially available kits (intra-assay and inter-assay CV’s of 2.7% and 6.5%, respectively). SHBG was measured with Roche Elecsys modular analytics Cobas e411 using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay where the lower detection limit of this assay was 0.35 nmol/L and the intra-assay CV was 2.6–5.6%. FSH, testosterone, and estradiol were also quantified using the Elecsys Cobas e-411 commercially available kits. The limits of detection for FSH, testosterone, and estradiol were 0.100 mIU/L, 0.025 ng/mL, and 5 pg/mL, respectively. Serum 25(OH)D was measured using Roche Elecsys modular analytics (Cobas e411) and assessed using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Intra- and inter-assay CV were 4% and 6.5%, respectively. Serum VDBP was determined by ELISA (R&D Systems) with inter-assay CV (1.6–3.6%), and recovery of (98–103%). Free and bioavailable 25(OH)D were calculated using the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, DBP, and albumin as previously described [29]. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L based on regional guidelines. [30].

4.3. Anthropometrics and DXA

BMD (g/cm2) was recorded for all selected participants at the lumbar spine and femur using Prodigy- (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. T-Scores were recorded and those below −1.0 to −2.5 indicated low bone mass based on national and regional guidelines [31,32].

4.4. Calculations Used

The following indices were calculated as follows:
  • FAI = Total testosterone/SHBG × 100
Free estrogen index (FEI) was calculated as:
  • FEI = Total estradiol/SHBG × 100

4.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 16.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Normal continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normal variables were presented as median (1st quartile–3rd quartile). Non-normality was tested using histogram and confirmed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Significance differences were tested using independent sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test for normal and non-normal variables, respectively. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to determine significant differences after adjusting for age and BMI. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between study parameters. Furthermore, multivariate stepwise linear regression was used to identify variables independently associated with free, bioavailable, and total 25(OH)D. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to determine the relationship of 25(OH)D metabolites with sex hormones and their indices among postmenopausal Arab women. Androgens, particularly testosterone, are associated with bioavailable and free 25(OH)D, independent of other hormones, including bone turnover markers. The results of this study suggest the clinical importance of other vitamin D metabolites related to hormonal regulation and associated osteoporosis risk among Arab post-menopausal women.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M.A.-D.; validation, S.M.Y.; experiments and formal analysis, K.A.W. and M.G.A.A.; data curation, S.D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.S.; supervision and project administration, N.M.A.-D.; funding acquisition, N.M.A.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs, Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases (CBCD), Department of Biochemistry, College of Science in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approvals were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of the College of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (IRB no. 13-094) and the College of Science in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (No. 8/25/454266).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants submitted written informed consent prior to inclusion in the database.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated and analyzed in the study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to all the subjects who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ansari, M.G.A.; Sabico, S.; Clerici, M.; Khattak, M.N.K.; Wani, K.; Al-Musharaf, S.; Amer, O.E.; Alokail, M.S.; Al-Daghri, N.M. Vitamin D Supplementation Is Associated with Increased Glutathione Peroxidase-1 Levels in Arab Adults with Prediabetes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gembillo, G.; Cernaro, V.; Siligato, R.; Curreri, F.; Catalano, A.; Santoro, D. Vitamin D in renal tubulopathies. Metabolites 2020, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Charoenggam, N.; Holick, M.F. Immunologic effects of vitamin D on human health and disease. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Daghri, N.M.; Amer, O.E.; Khattak, M.N.K.; Sabico, S.; Ansari, M.G.A.; Al-Saleh, Y.; Aljohani, N.; Alfawaz, H.; Alokail, M.S. Effects of different vitamin D supplementation strategies in reversing metabolic syndrome and its component risk factors in adolescents. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 191, 105378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Daghri, N.M.; Mohammed, A.K.; Al-Attas, O.S.; Ansari, M.G.A.; Wani, K.; Hussain, S.D.; Sabico, S.; Tripathi, G.; Alokail, M.S. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Modify Cardiometabolic Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in T2DM Patients. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ibrahim, M.K.M.; Elnimeiri, M.K.M. Non-classical presentation of vitamin D deficiency: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2020, 14, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al Saleh, Y.; El Seid, M.E.; Ruhaiyem, M.E.; Al Sayed, F.; Alkhairy, A.; Al Zaid, S.; Al Sayed, O.; Salih, S.; Al-Daghri, N.M. Characteristics and outcomes of osteoporotic hip fractures: Treatment gaps in a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 32, 1689–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siafarikas, A.; Simm, P.; Zacharin, M.; Jefferies, C.; Lafferty, A.R.; Wheeler, B.J.; Tham, E.; Brown, J.; Biggin, A.; Hofman, P.; et al. Global consensus on nutritional rickets: Implications for Australia. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2020, 56, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Daghri, N.M. Vitamin D in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, distribution and disease associations. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 175, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Daghri, N.M.; Al-Attas, O.S.; Al-Okail, M.S.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Al-Yousef, M.A.; Nadhrah, H.M.; Sabico, S.B.; Chrousos, G.P. Severe hypovitaminosis D is widespread and more common in non-diabetics than diabetics in Saudi adults. Saudi Med. J. 2010, 31, 775–780. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barzanji, A.T.; Alamri, F.A.; Mohamed, A.G. Osteoporosis: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Community Health 2013, 38, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alwahhabi, B.K. Osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia. Are we doing enough? Saudi Med. J. 2015, 36, 1149–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bikle, D.D.; Malmstroem, S.; Schwartz, J. Current Controversies: Are Free Vitamin Metabolite Levels a More Accurate Assessment of Vitamin D Status than Total Levels? Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 46, 901–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bouillon, R. Free or Total 25OHD as Marker for Vitamin D Status? J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1124–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bikle, D.; Bouillon, R.; Thadhani, R.; Schoenmakers, I. Vitamin D metabolites in captivity? Should we measure free or total 25(OH)D to assess vitamin D status? J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 173, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Holick, M.F. Bioavailability of vitamin D and its metabolites in black and white adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2047–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Riggs, B.L.; Khosla, S.; Melton, L.J., 3rd. Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr. Rev. 2002, 23, 279–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khosla, S.; Melton, L.J., 3rd; Atkinson, E.J.; O’Fallon, W.M.; Klee, G.G.; Riggs, B.L. Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: A key role for bioavailable estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 2266–2274. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bhattarai, H.K.; Shrestha, S.; Rokka, K.; Shakya, R. Vitamin D, Calcium, Parathyroid Hormone, and Sex Steroids in Bone Health and Effects of Aging. J. Osteoporos 2020, 2020, 9324505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Kang, D.; Li, H. The effects of testosterone on bone health in males with testosterone deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020, 20, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Simo, R.; Saez-Lopez, C.; Barbosa-Desongles, A.; Hernandez, C.; Selva, D.M. Novel insights in SHBG regulation and clinical implications. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 26, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qu, Z.; Jiang, J.; Yang, F.; Huang, J.; Zhao, J.; Yan, S. Genetically Predicted Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Bone Mineral Density: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Velija-Asimi, Z. Evaluation of the association of vitamin D deficiency with gonadotropins and sex hormone in obese and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Med. Glas. 2014, 11, 170–176. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pilz, S.; Frisch, S.; Koertke, H.; Kuhn, J.; Dreier, J.; Obermayer-Pietsch, B.; Wehr, E.; Zittermann, A. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on testosterone levels in men. Horm. Metab. Res. 2011, 43, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eliades, M.; Spyrou, E. Vitamin D: A new player in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 1718–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heijboer, A.C.; Oosterwerff, M.; Schroten, N.F.; Eekhoff, E.M.; Chel, V.G.; de Boer, R.A.; Blankenstein, M.A.; Lips, P. Vitamin D supplementation and testosterone concentrations in male human subjects. Clin. Endocrinol. 2015, 83, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghaleb, A.; Abdi, S.; Yakout, S.; Hussain, S.D.; Wani, K.; Masoud, M.; Alnaami, M.; Al-Daghri, N.M. Serum iron deficiency as an independent risk factor for osteoporosis in postmenopausal Arab women. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wani, K.; Yakout, S.M.; Ansari, M.G.A.; Sabico, S.; Hussain, S.D.; Alokail, M.S.; Shesha, E.; Aljohani, N.J.; Al-Saleh, Y.; Reginster, J.-Y.; et al. Metabolic syndrome in Arab adults with low bone mineral density. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Powe, C.E.; Ricciardi, C.; Berg, A.H.; Erdenesanaa, D.; Collerone, G.; Ankers, E.; Wenger, J.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Thadhani, R.; Bhan, I. Vitamin D-binding protein modifies the vitamin D-bone mineral density relationship. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011, 26, 1609–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saleh, Y.; Beshyah, S.A.; Hussein, W.; Almadani, A.; Hassoun, A.; Al Mamari, A.; Ba-Essa, E.; Al-Dhafiri, E.; Hassanein, M.; Fouda, M.A.; et al. Diagnosis and management of vitamin D deficiency in the Gulf Cooperative Council (GCC) countries: An expert consensus summary statement from the GCC vitamin D advisory board. Arch. Osteoporos 2020, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Saleh, Y.; Sulimani, R.; Sabico, S.; Raef, H.; Fouda, M.; Alshahrani, F.; Al Shaker, M.; Al Wahabi, B.; Sadat-Ali, M.; Al Rayes, H.; et al. 2015 Guidelines for Osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia: Recommendations from the Saudi Osteoporosis Society. Ann. Saudi Med. 2015, 35, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Al-Saleh, Y.; Al-Daghri, N.M.; Sabico, S.; Alessa, T.; Al Emadi, S.; Alawadi, F.; Al Qasaabi, S.; Alfutaisi, A.; Al Izzi, M.; Mukhaimer, J.; et al. Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: Consensus statement of the GCC countries’ osteoporosis societies under the auspices of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Arch. Osteoporos 2020, 15, 109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table 1. General Clinical Characteristics of Participants according to Normal and Low Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Groups.
Table 1. General Clinical Characteristics of Participants according to Normal and Low Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Groups.
Clinical ParametersNormalLow BMDp-ValuesAdj. p-Values *
N80 (42.3)109 (57.7)
Vitamin D Deficiency (%)36 (45.0)43 (39.4)
Age (years)53.3 ± 7.757.0 ± 8.2<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)34.1 ± 5.832.4 ± 6.2<0.001
Age of menarche13.0 ± 1.413.3 ± 1.60.0010.006
Menopause (years)9.6 ± 11.711.4 ± 10.60.010.30
Age during first pregnancy19.7 ± 4.019.0 ± 3.60.0060.005
Amenorrhea (years)7.1 ± 6.09.7 ± 7.1<0.0010.01
T-score (Spine)0.0 ± 0.8−2.1 ± 0.9<0.001<0.001
T-Score (Femur)0.6 ± 0.9−0.8 ± 1.0<0.001<0.001
BMD (Spine)1.21 ± 0.140.9 ± 0.1<0.001<0.001
BMD (Femur) 1.13 ± 0.130.9 ± 0.1<0.001<0.001
Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD. * p-value adjusted for age and BMI; p < 0.05 considered significant.
Table 2. Hormonal characteristics of participants according to Normal and Low BMD groups.
Table 2. Hormonal characteristics of participants according to Normal and Low BMD groups.
Biochemical ParametersReference RangesNormalLow BMDp-ValuesAdj. p-Values *
N--80 (42.3)109 (57.7)----
Corrected Calcium (mmol/L)0.7–4.02.3 ± 0.22.3 ± 0.20.840.40
25(OH) D (nmol/L)7.5–175.066.4 ± 34.273.5 ± 36.1<0.0010.18
Bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L) #--26.1 (13–51)29.1 (14–49)0.560.81
Free 25(OH)D (nmol/L) #--30.2 (15–54.1)33.4 (16–64)0.420.62
VDBP (mg/mL) #0.083–50.042.0 (7–105)23.2 (6–106)0.270.25
PTH (pg/mL) #1.2–5000.010.6 (6–20)15.4 (8–30)0.0020.04
SHBG (nmol/L) #0.8–200.018.2 (0.4–34)32.3 (1–57)0.0070.08
FSH (mIU/mL) #0.1–200.0 30.7 (11–51)40.6 (21–66)0.0020.29
Testosterone (ng/mL) #0.02–15.0 0.7 (0.4–1)0.6 (0.3–0.9)0.0070.02
Estradiol (pg/mL) #5.0–4300.0 108.7 (43–247)61.8 (33–196)0.020.13
FAI #--4.3 (1–182)1.5 (0.6–39)0.0020.07
FEI #--307.7 (142–24168)182.2 (62–3988)0.0070.09
FT (nmol/L) #--0.06 (0.04–0.17)0.0 (0.0–0.1)0.0030.20
BT (pmol/L × 10−4) #--2.8 (2–9)2.0 (1–4)0.0020.03
Note: -- indicates none; # indicates non-normal variables; VDBP, vitamin D binding protein; PTH, parathyroid hormone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; FAI, free androgen index; FEI, free estradiol index; FT, free testosterone; BT, bioavailable testosterone. * p-value adjusted for age and BMI; p < 0.05 considered significant.
Table 3. Bone Turnover Markers of Participants according to Normal and Low BMD Groups.
Table 3. Bone Turnover Markers of Participants according to Normal and Low BMD Groups.
Biochemical ParametersReference RangesNormalLow BMDp-ValuesAdj. p-Values *
N--80 (42.3)109 (57.7)----
P1NP (ng/mL) #5–120011.2 (5.0–30.0)13.4 (5.0–27.5)0.440.20
CTX (pg/mL) #10–600010.0 (10.0–84.5)20.0 (10.0–75.0)0.420.16
NTX (nmol/L) #20–300056.2 (42.6–75.5)49.8 (35.5–65.2)0.060.05
bALP (nmol/L)--1.1 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.30.980.75
Note: -- indicates none; # indicates non-normal variables; P1NP, (Procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal Propeptide); CTX, carboxy-terminal collagen; NTX, N-telopeptides of type I collagen; bALP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; * p-value adjusted for age and BMI; p < 0.05 considered significant.
Table 4. Correlation between vitamin D metabolites and measured parameters.
Table 4. Correlation between vitamin D metabolites and measured parameters.
ParametersTotal 25(OH)DBioavailable 25(OH)DFree 25(OH)D
AllNormalLow BMDAllNormalLow BMDAllNormalLow BMD
SHBG 0.130.070.02−0.27 **−0.30 *−0.26 **−0.21 **−0.24−0.20 *
FSH 0.17 *0.160.08−0.12−0.23−0.06−0.09−0.09−0.08
Testosterone 0.100.210.040.38 **0.45 **0.34 **0.37 **0.44 **0.33 **
BT 0.040.140.070.38 **0.48 **0.35 **0.34 **0.41 **0.32 **
FT −0.010.110.050.33 **0.44 **0.30 **0.34 **0.46 **0.31 **
Estradiol 0.010.030.060.39 **0.46 **0.34 **0.45 **0.46 **0.43 **
FAI−0.050.040.030.34 **0.43 **0.32 **0.29 **0.35 **0.27 **
FEI−0.06−0.040.050.35 **0.41 **0.33 **0.38 **0.40 **0.37 **
P1NP0.070.130.03−0.40 **−0.35 **−0.42 **−0.41 **−0.36 **−0.43 **
CTX0.09−0.010.12−0.23 **−0.33 **−0.19−0.24 **−0.35 **−0.18
NTX−0.06−0.09−0.03−0.05−0.16−0.01−0.07−0.19−0.02
bALP−0.08−0.16−0.02−0.11−0.360.10−0.12−0.38 **0.11
Note: Data presented as Spearman correlation coefficient; * and ** indicate significance at 5% and 1%, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Daghri, N.M.; Yakout, S.M.; Ansari, M.G.A.; Hussain, S.D.; Wani, K.A.; Sabico, S. Vitamin D Metabolites and Sex Steroid Indices in Postmenopausal Women with and without Low Bone Mass. Metabolites 2021, 11, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020086

AMA Style

Al-Daghri NM, Yakout SM, Ansari MGA, Hussain SD, Wani KA, Sabico S. Vitamin D Metabolites and Sex Steroid Indices in Postmenopausal Women with and without Low Bone Mass. Metabolites. 2021; 11(2):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Daghri, Nasser M., Sobhy M. Yakout, Mohammed G.A. Ansari, Syed D. Hussain, Kaiser A. Wani, and Shaun Sabico. 2021. "Vitamin D Metabolites and Sex Steroid Indices in Postmenopausal Women with and without Low Bone Mass" Metabolites 11, no. 2: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020086

APA Style

Al-Daghri, N. M., Yakout, S. M., Ansari, M. G. A., Hussain, S. D., Wani, K. A., & Sabico, S. (2021). Vitamin D Metabolites and Sex Steroid Indices in Postmenopausal Women with and without Low Bone Mass. Metabolites, 11(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop