Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature
Abstract
:1. Smart Mobility
- Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs) are advanced intermodal transport networks used for smart cities. As one of the key tenets of mobility solutions, ITSs are specialized systems for data collection, storage, and processing and provide expertise in the planning, execution, and assessment of the integrated initiatives and policies of smart mobility. Urban areas are also connected to innovative ideas enabled by the Internet of Things (IoT), as per the common idea of smart connectivity [6,7].
- Open-data and open-source transport frameworks are used to model mass transit connectivity, develop and mimic bicycle sharing schemes, collect mass transit routing data, offer real-time alternative route information [8], track and document traffic safety data, and perform travel time questionnaires. Open data implementation can be used by authorities and supervisors of urban countries to bring about cost-effective designs and execution [9]. Urban areas gather valuable information and create vast amounts of data for development, invention, and decision-making [10].
- Big data modeling and data gathering, virtualization, and structured recognition-based methods are used to consider the commuter’s needs, traffic control, and shifts in prodding behavior. Through the introduction of modern IoT apps, the scale of collected data has increased tremendously. This scenario can be used for various reasons. It may be used to forecast movements in areas with a high population density. In traffic-related scenarios, the most popular applications with huge data sets are cooperative and sharing platforms that enable improved efficiency and control with the use of pre-existing traffic control resources [11,12].
- The essence of this topic is to empower people to have views and input, as well as to engage in decision-making processes. Cities and neighborhoods welcome the opportunity to work with their residents to cocreate safer and smarter mobility for commuters with respect to new ways of community governance and involvement. It can be used to track road construction and maintenance, account for road incidents, evaluate safety and security issues, gather vehicle-sharing information, and curtail excessive pedestrian occupancy [11,12].
2. Importance of Smart Mobility
3. Good Practices in Smart Mobility
- the design of reliable, accessible, safe, and comfortable transport networks, integrated with ridesharing technologies (MaaS) as well as other channels;
- adaptation to the acceptance and development of vehicles (fully independent, linked, battery powered, communicated, dockless);
- development of effective public–private partnerships (PPPs) and collaboration with knowledgeable institutions to discuss problems, such as pollution levels, overcrowding, and sustainability; and
- expansion of new infrastructure—both technical and electronic—to support creative government and industry mobility solutions.
4. Research Design
5. Approaches of Previous Smart Mobility Researchers
6. Organizational, Technical, and Social Requirements for Intelligent Transport Performance
7. Discussion
7.1. Smart Mobility: Now and into the Future
7.2. Smart Mobility and Open Innovation
8. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Ethical Consent
References
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M. Smart cities and mobility: Do the smartness of Australian cities lead to sustainable commuting patterns? J. Urban Technol. 2019, 26, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomaszewska, E.J.; Florea, A. Urban smart mobility in the scientific literature—Bibliometric analysis. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2018, 10, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aletà, N.B.; Alonso, C.M.; Ruiz, R.M.A. Smart mobility and smart environment in the Spanish cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 24, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gabrys, J. Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 2014, 32, 30–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bazzan, A.L.; Klügl, F. Introduction to intelligent systems in traffic and transportation. Synth. Lect. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 2013, 7, 1–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannopoulos, G.A. The application of information and communication technologies in transport. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 152, 302–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pigni, F.; Piccoli, G.; Watson, R. Digital data streams: Creating value from the real-time flow of big data. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2016, 58, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nallur, V.; Elgammal, A.; Clarke, S. Smart route planning using open data and participatory sensing. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2015; pp. 91–100. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, L.; Yu, F.R.; Yan, Q. When big data meets software-defined networking: SDN for big data and big data for SDN. IEEE Netw. 2016, 30, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khisty, C.J. Citizen involvement in the transportation planning process: What is and what ought to be. J. Adv. Transp. 2000, 34, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irvin, R.A.; Stansbury, J. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 2004, 64, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.C.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in building smarter cities: Insights from a systematic review of the literature. Energies 2020, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lakshmanan, T.R.; Chatterjee, L.R. Economic consequences of transport improvements. ACCESS Mag. 2005, 1, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
- Chong, M.; Habib, A.; Evangelopoulos, N.; Park, H.W. Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sochor, J.; Arby, H.; Karlsson, I.M.; Sarasini, S. A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2018, 27, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Docherty, I.; Marsden, G.; Anable, J. The governance of smart mobility. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 115, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jessop, B. Entrepreneurial City. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Gironés, E.S.; Vrščaj, D. Who Benefits from Smart Mobility Policies? The Social Construction of Winners and Losers in the Connected Bikes Projects in the Netherlands’. In Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2018; pp. 85–101. [Google Scholar]
- Merlin, L.A. Comparing automated shared taxis and conventional bus transit for a small city. J. Public Transp. 2017, 20, 2–7. [Google Scholar]
- Anthopoulos, L. Smart utopia vs. smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 2017, 63, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appio, F.P.; Lima, M.; Paroutis, S. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technol. Forecast. Social Chang. 2019, 142, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perboli, G.; Ferrero, F.; Musso, S.; Vesco, A. Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 115, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turetken, O.; Grefen, P.; Gilsing, R.; Adali, O.E. Service-dominant business model design for digital innovation in smart mobility. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2019, 61, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, P.; Sun, J.; Qi, H. Estimation of delay variability at signalized intersections for urban arterial performance evaluation. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 21, 94–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawieska, J.; Pieriegud, J. Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transp. Policy 2018, 63, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Raman, K.R. Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. The Making of a Smart City: Best Practices across Europe; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; pp. 10–256. Available online: https://smart-cities-marketplace.ec.europa.eu/insights/publications/making-smart-city-best-practices-across-europe (accessed on 16 July 2020).
- Space. The Road to Better Mobility. 2019. Available online: https://space.uitp.org/ (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Moixa. Driving Forward with Smart EV Fleet Charging: Another Exciting Innovation Project for Moixa. 2019. Available online: https://www.moixa.com/blog-smart-ev-fleet-charging-driving-forward-with-ups/ (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. Exploring Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from Literature and Focus Group Meetings Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis. 2019. Available online: https://maasalliance.eu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2018/11/MaaS-brochure-ENG.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Smart City PDX. Traffic Safety Sensor Project. 2019. Available online: https://www.smartcitypdx.com/traffic-safety-sensor-project (accessed on 23 June 2020).
- Aurecon. Smart Stations, Australia: Putting User Needs at the Heart of Future Station Design. 2019. Available online: https://www.aurecongroup.com/projects/transport/smart-stations (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Hamburg Port Authority. In Hamburg We Are Smart. 2019. Available online: https://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/en/hpa-360/smartport/ (accessed on 24 June 2020).
- Global City Teams Challenge. Blueprint for Improving First and Last Mile Connections for Transit and Freight. 2019. Available online: https://pages.nist.gov/GCTC/uploads/blueprints/20180225_TransportationBlueprintFeb24.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2020).
- Federal Transit Administration. Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox Program. 2020. Available online: https://www.transit.dot.gov/research-innovation/mobility-demand-mod-sandbox-program (accessed on 26 June 2020).
- Caballero, J.; Colclough, A. Best Practice Guide 2017–2018. In European Mobility Week; 2018; pp. 1–15. Available online: https://mobilityweek.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/materials/participation_resources/2018/2018%20EMW%20Best%20Practice%20Guide%20LR.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2020).
- Battarra, R.; Gargiulo, C.; Tremiterra, M.R.; Zucaro, F. Smart Mobility in Italian Metropolitan Cities: A comparative analysis through indicators and actions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benevolo, C.; Dameri, R.P.; D’Auria, B. Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering Organizations; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 13–28. [Google Scholar]
- Garau, C.; Masala, F.; Pinna, F. Cagliari and smart urban mobility: Analysis and comparison. Cities 2016, 56, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xian, H.; Madhavan, K. Anatomy of scholarly collaboration in engineering education: A big-data bibliometric analysis. J. Eng. Educ. 2014, 103, 486–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellegaard, O.; Wallin, J.A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 2015, 105, 1809–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, W.; Zhao, Y. Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2015, 50, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braga, I.P.C.; Dantas, H.F.B.; Leal, M.R.D.; Almeida, M.R.D.; Santos, E.M.D. Urban mobility performance indicators: A bibliometric analysis. Gestão Produção 2019, 26, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fu, Y.; Zhang, X. Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis. Cities 2017, 60, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trindade, E.P.; Hinnig, M.P.F.; Moreira da Costa, E.; Marques, J.S.; Bastos, R.C.; Yigitcanlar, T. Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knupfer, M.S.; Pokotilo, V.; Woetzel, J. Elements of Success: Urban Transportation Systems of 24 Global Cities; McKinsey Company: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 5–69. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/elements-of-success-urban-transportation-systems-of-24-global-cities (accessed on 11 June 2020).
- Van Audenhove, F.J.; Dauby, L.; Korniichuk, O.; Pourbaix, J. The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow. 2014, pp. 20–72. Available online: https://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/members/140124%20Arthur%20D.%20Little%20%26%20UITP_Future%20of%20Urban%20Mobility%202%200_Full%20study.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Shaheen, S.; Cohen, A. Mobility on demand (MOD) and mobility as a service (MaaS): Early understanding of shared mobility impacts and public transit partnerships. In Demand for Emerging Transportation Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 37–59. [Google Scholar]
- Toutouh, J.; Arellano, J.; Alba, E. BiPred: A bilevel evolutionary algorithm for prediction in smart mobility. Sensors 2018, 18, 4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mangiaracina, R.; Perego, A.; Salvadori, G.; Tumino, A. A comprehensive view of intelligent transport systems for urban smart mobility. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2017, 20, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noy, K.; Givoni, M. Is ‘smart mobility’ sustainable? Examining the views and beliefs of transport’s technological entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2018, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ilarri, S.; Stojanovic, D.; Ray, C. Semantic management of moving objects: A vision towards smart mobility. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 1418–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lacey, G.; MacNamara, S. User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2000, 37, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Olaverri-Monreal, C. Autonomous vehicles and smart mobility related technologies. Infocommun. J. 2016, 8, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Cledou, G.; Estevez, E.; Barbosa, L.S. A taxonomy for planning and designing smart mobility services. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poslad, S.; Ma, A.; Wang, Z.; Mei, H. Using a smart city IoT to incentivise and target shifts in mobility behaviour—Is it a piece of pie? Sensors 2015, 15, 13069–13096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amoretti, M.; Belli, L.; Zanichelli, F. UTravel: Smart mobility with a novel user profiling and recommendation approach. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017, 38, 474–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Sospedra, J.; Avariento, J.; Rambla, D.; Montoliu, R.; Casteleyn, S.; Benedito-Bordonau, M.; Huerta, J. Enhancing integrated indoor/outdoor mobility in a smart campus. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2015, 29, 1955–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Földes, D.; Csiszár, C. Conception of future integrated smart mobility. In 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Ning, Z.; Xia, F.; Ullah, N.; Kong, X.; Hu, X. Vehicular social networks: Enabling smart mobility. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 16–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peprah, C.; Amponsah, O.; Oduro, C. A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 282–291. [Google Scholar]
Meaning | Source |
---|---|
Smart mobility is a significant element of a smart city plan. | [1] |
Smart mobility is the pinnacle of a smart city and is associated with a municipal verdict and technique grounded in communication, information, and technological instruments. | [2] |
Smart mobility contains a number of actions that enhance users’ mobility by foot, public or private transportation, or any other means of transport. It leads to a reduction in economic costs that are incurred by the environment and time. | [3] |
Smart mobility is not just the embedding of technology into an urban infrastructure, it also calls for citizens to pursue and relate to their urban surroundings in a smart and rational way. | [4] |
Smart mobility is generally an approach that aids in the reduction of poisonous fumes expelled into the atmosphere by vehicles and human congestion. Equally, smart mobility aids in raising the quality of transportation in a manner that is environmentally friendly. | [5] |
Intelligent transport system (ITS) | An ITS is a network that helps maximize the use of existing infrastructure through a range of technological means, such as traffic signals, travel planners, smart ticketing, and cooperative systems. | [6] |
ITSs will make transportation safe, efficient, and sustainable by considering appropriate digital technologies for all types of passengers and freight. | [7] | |
Open-data and open-source transport applications | Open-data and open-source technology is an international data portal in which anonymous vehicle and smartphone locations are converted into real-time and historical traffic analysis. | [8] |
Open-source applications and accessible data help to provide social wellness; however, in a smart city implementation, they also relieve several of the unavoidable privacy concerns. Employment of open data is aimed at providing a global-level understanding of the differing facades of a state and the travel behavior of individuals who live in specific constituencies. | [9] | |
Applications for big data analytics | Big data has drawn great interest from business and academia alike. Big data contains such large and complex data sets that conventional database management systems or analysis methods are insufficient to handle them. Big data transportation analytics are now providing valuable solutions in the fields of traffic routing, congestion control, and routing. | [10] |
Citizen engagement and crowd-sourcing strategies from the ground up | Public participation in the process of traffic management is an effort to ensure that civilians have a proper say in public decision-making. Public participation is central to urban planning. When it comes to the planning and implementation of transport infrastructure, there is a tendency to focus on how to involve the public and on what method should be used. | [11] |
Citizen participation is recognized as a crucial factor in understanding the full impact of urban planning interventions, but the mechanism is still perceived as complicated, time-consuming, and expensive, with a lack of ability at the community level to execute the support programs. | [12] |
Potential Stakeholder Benefits | |
---|---|
Public authorities | Linked mass transit systems have one of the highest levels of potential for dramatically enhancing productivity gains across a city [14]. A well-designed smart mobility strategy provides city leaders with the opportunity to obtain and analyze vast amounts of data—and easily gather meaningful, actionable perspectives [15]. Town, national, or state government entities may affect the social and environmental influence of transportation services; that is, they can affect the actions of passengers by setting requirements for carriers (and individual transportation network operators) to establish incentives for acceptable behavior [16]. |
State subdivisions of transportation | Encourages smart mobility to build enabling architectural, legal, and political structures that support the system [17]. |
Politicians | Investment decisions in smart mobility are playing a crucial role in improving the regional and international productivity of cities to draw new businesses [18]. Smart mobility is an approach in which stakeholders—city leaders, executives, and administrations—will work in collaboration with suppliers to harness political control to maximize victors, minimize potential casualties, and eliminate organizational and structural obstacles to achieve the dream of smart mobility [19]. |
Planners | Reduced congestion, driverless car production, and productive automobile navigation all minimize vehicle-related space requirements in city areas, potentially creating a ground for development [20]. |
Inhabitants | The expansion of digital infrastructure in communities allows smart mobility to enhance connectivity among citizens [21]. Successful, intelligent transport approaches help a community to recognize transportation trends that will benefit the aspirations, needs, and concerns of citizens [22]. |
Venture | Intelligent transport innovations—for example, intelligent parking control—enable cities to leverage extra funding streams [23]. Investment decisions in smart mobility are playing an increasingly significant role in boosting the competitiveness of regional and international cities to draw innovative businesses [24]. |
Cargo operators | Smart mobility offers convergence of road traffic management for urban arteries and metropolitan highways [25]. |
Researchers | Building new smart mobility efficiency strategies [26]. |
Different highway customers | Several towns have begun spending on mobility solutions to help promote a healthier transportation community [27]. |
Spain | Developing infrastructure for billing Managing parking Optimized multiple mode lightweight goods transportation |
United Kingdom | E-Bicycles Minibus battery-powered service Filling stations for electric vehicles Testing driverless cars Loading stations Switching gasoline to hybrid cars Powered cargo bikes |
Germany | Meets the growing infrastructure for billing Intelligent credit cards Managing parking Shared hybrid and traditional cars and bicycles Construction of new multisensory transportation channels to boost e-mobility utilization Goods swapping and distribution stations Implementation of an established car-sharing system for e-cars |
Netherlands | Smart autonomous car charging by optimizing the use of charging stations Chipping tickets Detailed parking space evaluation (real-time parking reference framework) |
Italy | Quick-charge architecture secured for a frigate of e-taxis Swift charging points Bays to park in Smooth, hybrid, and battery-powered automobiles Motor homes Automobiles with e-logistics Power cabs |
France | Stands on smart charging stations Chipping cards Self-driving automated electric shuttle Car-sharing electric cars |
Region | Measure | Description | Project | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Germany | Computerized and linked vehicles | Production and testing of autonomous and connected cars across the globe. | The SPACE initiative reflects the concept that they will be implemented in thousands of shared vehicles and incorporated with public transit systems so autonomous cars can lead to greater transportation. | [29] |
United Kingdom | Vehicle electrification | Battery advances, energy efficiency, and centralized control of transportation emissions propel vehicle electrification. | EFLES aims to optimize the increasing electric vehicle (EV) fleet of shipping companies and to show how wireless grids will incentivize massive fleet companies to go green. | [30] |
Finland | Transportation as a Service | Transport as a network is the convergence of different modes of transportation systems into a unified, on-request, open mobility service. | The Whim app from Helsinki seeks to provide an alternative to private cars via versatile ride-sharing programs alongside monthly tickets for mass transit trips. | [31] |
United States | Sensor systems | The aim of collaborative radar systems is to use interaction and networks to enhance highway safety and to prepare it. | The highway safety Monitor Project Initiative will test new sensing devices applied to street lighting to analyze the information required for full transparency into how people are driving and where possible trouble spots might exist. | [32] |
Australia | Smart stations | Intelligent stations leverage station capacity as a forum for the creation of innovative low-carbon and climate-friendly technologies and solutions. | The project group from Aurecon conducted detailed client assessments, user and rail personnel interviews, and seminars to identify a “smart station” and devise layout criteria. | [33] |
Germany | Smart logistics | Employ smart logistics to more efficiently manage the ever-increasing commodity flows, shippers, trans-shipment hubs, forwarders, and recipients. | The intelligent PORT transportation driver-assist platform provides stakeholders with the knowledge that is important to them throughout the logistics chain. With the aid of a single, overall smart logistics network, the Hamburg transportation department can successfully monitor the growing mobility of goods. | [34] |
United States | First and last link information management | The database offers up-to-date road traffic information by traffic volume station. | The purpose of the Global City Groups contest is to identify resources afforded by first- and last-mile vehicles, including connected, low-speed, and driverless driving, and explain how cars and platforms will play a significant role throughout the last mile delivering packages as well as other cargo. | [35] |
Czech Republic | Feasible Technical and Electronic Infrastructure | Practices in the nation received functional as well as inspirational motivation. The state is using innovation initiatives to expand knowledge and expertise. | A modern smartphone app offers data on a wide range of paths, such as combined modality choices, informing cyclists where bicycles are welcome by bus and train and reminding drivers how often positions are vacant at the closest park-and-ride. | [37] |
Number of Indicators | Intelligent Vehicle Metrics | Source |
---|---|---|
28 | Connectivity: need for mass transit, availability of public transit, mass transit roads, number of bus stations, rail networks, halts in the transport network, and ticket parking Viability: environmental buses, foot zones, congestion-enclosed spaces, bike paths, environmental vehicles, requests for carpooling, production of ridesharing, the production capacity of ridesharing, and the density of bike sharing Data communication innovation: traffic signage schemes, variable message symbols, text messaging for road warnings, automated parking payment systems, smartphone software, SMS for data pertaining to public transit, automated bus station signs, digital travel tickets, digital mobile device travel tickets, route maps, maps, dates, local public transport planners, and online tickets | [38] |
46 | Some of the crowd transportation cars and inventive transport solutions employed include hybrid cars, EUR 5 buses, and consumption of renewable energy sources. Personal and corporate movement: vehicle rental, ride-pooling, and car sharing; bike rental, sable bus connecting, urban navigation, and environmental driving Mobility hold-up facilities and policies include parks and drives, cyclers’ pathways, pillars for charging self-directed cars, flexibility warning signs, interactive stop signs, pedestrian- or automobile-free zones, controlled transit areas, bus or bus-only lanes, traffic management programs, pace monitoring and management systems, transportation practices focusing on vehicular networks, the level of pollutant emissions, detailed knowledge to help intelligent transport measures, division of traffic patterns, coordinated implementation of booking of pollutant emissions, detailed knowledge to help intelligent transport, strategic division of traffic patterns, coordinated implementation of booking of tax credits, and measures for sustainable mobility. Other measures include the establishment of a system that monitors those entering restricted areas. These may include cordon charging, congestion costing, digital toll systems, digital GPS tolling, charge-as-you-continue driving, computerized parking navigation systems, variable message signage, Metro Traffic Control, surveillance systems for area and ecosystem security, software solutions for mobility management, and traffic note-taking. | [39] |
19 | Mass transit: concentrations of the transport system, mass transportation usage, stop signs Cycle lanes: number of cycle tracks, bike lanes for 10,000 residents Bike exchange: frequency of bicycle stations, a bike per 1000 people Ridesharing car for 1000 people, a station per population of 1000 Public transit support network: digital bus traffic signals, online ticketing payment method, route information, timetables and queue length, path estimation travel manager, and online travel booking | [40] |
Reference | Innovation Features | Social Features | Organizational Features | Objective Users |
---|---|---|---|---|
[2] | Industries can gain insights from strategic efforts to understand technical developments and international business growth. | Citizens have to be trained with the community’s talents, and governments should use gamified strategies to reward good conduct and deter bad conduct. | Cities and funding organizations may use this research to compare practical solutions to smart transit systems at regional, national, and international levels. | Investigators, townships, and the industry field |
[9] | Intelligent mobilities are innovation infusions into the system of a town. | Compels people to connect with their city. People need to be inspired to contribute data to the city, thus helping to establish an index at the municipal level. | Many government and public agencies publish information gathered by their data collection and data analysis entities. | Inhabitants |
[16] | Advancements in connected vehicles as well as other modern technologies may require smart mobilities to be controlled in a timely manner. | An individual’s mobility platform would include a part that involves intelligent transport data but also a part that incorporates haulage services. | Examples of structural frameworks for MaaS entail revising economic policies and redistributing subsidies at the city, region, and national level. | Communities, commercial entities |
[24] | Most of the advancements are based on technology-driven, totally remote innovations, including smart trip planning for passengers. | An environment where innovation has tremendous potential is smart transport, which enables one to navigate safely and effectively using a large amount of information to a defined geographical location. | To design a commercial plan for a company, one must sit alongside venture and public agencies. | Businesses |
[26] | Urban cities are ever-evolving from a technical point of view, and emerging innovations are generating new opportunities for intelligent transport governance. | Technological development needs to be backed by social and attitudinal shifts about the habits of mobility. | Environmental safety is a critical feature of the distinctly European and international initiatives. | Administration |
[63] | Smart mobility does provide fully integrated, Internet-based state services that allow omnipresent interconnections to reshape critical functions in authorities. | An intelligent transport strategy is a method for integrating entire neighborhoods, developing tailored programs to meet community priorities, and enhancing mutual resources and capabilities. | From top-down or central planning strategies, an effective smart mobility system can be developed, but active participation from every sector of society is crucial. | Regimes, corporations, hospitals, not-for-profit entities, and registered nationals |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bıyık, C.; Abareshi, A.; Paz, A.; Ruiz, R.A.; Battarra, R.; Rogers, C.D.F.; Lizarraga, C. Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146
Bıyık C, Abareshi A, Paz A, Ruiz RA, Battarra R, Rogers CDF, Lizarraga C. Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(2):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146
Chicago/Turabian StyleBıyık, Can, Ahmad Abareshi, Alexander Paz, Rosa Arce Ruiz, Rosaria Battarra, Christopher D. F. Rogers, and Carmen Lizarraga. 2021. "Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 2: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146
APA StyleBıyık, C., Abareshi, A., Paz, A., Ruiz, R. A., Battarra, R., Rogers, C. D. F., & Lizarraga, C. (2021). Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146