Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I am very grateful to review this interesting paper. It is well written, however I suggest some major improvements.

Describe clearly the study aim and methodology in the abstract

The literature review part must be improved with some more sources, comments and hypothesis elaboration based on this as now it is very poor.

Please consider also following sources:

Imm, C.L., Wahid, N.A.mThe seeds of leadership: From the experiences of senior Malaysian women leaders. (2020) Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22 (1), pp. 200-216.

Kot, S., Meyer, N., Broniszewska, A. A cross-country comparison of the characteristics of Polish and South African women entrepreneurs. (2016) Economics and Sociology, 9 (4), pp. 207-221.

Onyusheva, I., Meyer, N. The features of female entrepreneurship development in Kazakhstan: An analytical survey. (2020) Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21 (1), pp. 265-282.

Nowak, M. Entrepreneurship in china’s greater bay area-a gender perspective (2020) Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22 (2), pp. 324-344.

Al-Tkhayneh, K., Kot, S., Shestak, V. Motivation and demotivation factors affecting productivity in public sector. (2019) Administratie si Management Public, 2019 (33), pp. 77-102

Results section must be developed with some more introduction to data presentation as well as comments and explanations.

Results must be also discussed in relation to the previous studies already published.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1

I hope you are well. The required changes have been made. Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find attached the Review Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2

I hope you are doing well. The required changes have been made in the revised paper. Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 3

I hope you are doing well. The required changes have been made in the revised paper. Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am satisfied of the improvements!

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments!

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors are addressed the issues raised in the revised version.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments!

Reviewer 3 Report

congrats!

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments. Improved and editing has done.