Peer-Review Record
Benchmark of Rotor Position Sensor Technologies for Application in Automotive Electric Drive Trains
Electronics 2020, 9(7), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9071063
Reviewer 1:
Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Anonymous
Electronics 2020, 9(7), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9071063
Submission received: 29 May 2020
/
Revised: 12 June 2020
/
Accepted: 14 June 2020
/
Published: 28 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Control Systems for Electric Drives)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is well written and of general interest. I have only minor remarks:
- In Eq. (4) there is atan2 function, in Eq. (9) there is arctan (in italics) and in (13) atan, not in italics. It would be preferable to use only one function designation, I recommend arctan (or arctan2), not in italics (it is a function, not a variable).
- Equations should be written with full size fractions, not like atan(Vsin(t)/Vcos(t)).
- Differentials in equations should be written not in italics (eq. (5), (14),
- There should be spaces between numerical values and units (lines 344, 345, 428, 444, for example).
Some spell check would be preferable.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
- How can the angular information of the rotating magnet be determined by measuring the bridges’ resistance? Please explain clearly and provide the theorem. That is the Eq.(10) must be proved.
- The comparision of methods of AMR position sensors and GMR sensors should be presented.
- Fig.16-18 are demonstrated as bar chart, how can authors prove the results are verified? I suggest you to add some real time process diagrams to justify the good performances.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
