Next Article in Journal
Energy Optimization for Software-Defined Data Center Networks Based on Flow Allocation Strategies
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Backup Beams for Instantaneous Link Recovery in mmWave Communications
Previous Article in Journal
State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Temperature-Dependent Second-Order RC Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Permittivity of Undoped Silicon in the Millimeter Wave Range
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a SIW Variable Phase Shifter for Beam Steering Antenna Systems

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2019, 8(9), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091013
Submission received: 26 July 2019 / Revised: 4 September 2019 / Accepted: 8 September 2019 / Published: 11 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Millimeter-Wave (mmWave) Communications)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a new beam steering antenna system consisting of two variable reflection-type phase shifters, a 3 dB coupler, and a 90° phase transition. The entire structure is designed and fabricated on a single layer of substrate integrated waveguide (SIW), which makes it a low loss and low-profile antenna system. Surface mount tuning varactor diodes are chosen as electrical phase control elements. By changing the biasing voltage of the varactor diodes in the phase shifter circuits, the far-field radiation pattern of the antenna steers from −25° to 25°. The system has a reflection coefficient better than −10 dB for a 2 GHz bandwidth centered at 17 GHz, a directive radiation pattern with a maximum of 10.7 dB gain at the mid-band frequency, and cross polarization better than 20 dB. A prototype is fabricated and measured for design verification. The measured far-field radiation patterns, co and cross polarization, and the reflection coefficient of the antenna system agree with simulated results.

1. Introduction

Beam steering antenna systems have become progressively popular in modern communications. Transferring and receiving high rate data, scanning a large scale of the atmosphere, having compact structures with minimum losses—all are attributed to and achieved through electrical beam steering antenna systems.
The main components in designing a beam steering antenna system are the phase shifters. Phase shifting in an antenna array can be achieved by using different methods. Included are variable phase shifters equipped with varactor diodes [1], PIN diode phase shifters (which have three types: switched line, loaded line, and reflection) [2], a Nolen matrix [3] or a Butler matrix [4] for constant phase shifts, complementary split ring resonators (CSRRs) [5], a tunable band-pass filter as phase shifter [6], a liquid crystal miniaturized phase shifter [7], some innovative vector-sum phase shifters by using CMOS technology [8,9], and a continuously steered beam in a range of ±45° through an array of vector controllers [10], to name only a few.
Substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) has recently attracted a lot of attention because of its compactness, low loss, and its promising performance in mm-wave and microwave applications. Therefore, researchers started to not only use this technology for passive components, but also in active component areas like variable phase shifters. Reference [1] introduces two SIW phase shifters. First, an inline phase shifter using a varactor diode with a phase shift of 25°. Secondly, a 180° SIW reflection-type phase shifter including a biasing circuit, four varactor diodes, and two open stubs. By changing the loading of a waveguide, a controllable phase shifter is achieved in [11]. The phase shift is controlled by four PIN diodes inserted in the substrate, and a maximum phase shift of 45° is obtained. An EM-wave coupling technique is proposed for achieving a wider bandwidth in a two layer SIW phase shifter design [12], and a phase shift of up to 180° is obtained by using eight PIN diodes. The combination of a 90° hybrid consisting of two waveguide layers and four varactor diodes, two on top and two on the bottom, results in a four layer structure. This phase shifter has nearly 360° phase variation [13]. The authors of [14] propose an SIW K-band phase shifter with minimum 105° phase tuning range and 4 dB insertion loss by using varactor diodes as tuning elements. Note that since varactor diodes and their connecting transitions add losses to the circuit and also affect the radiation pattern of the antenna due to radiations from the connecting microstrip lines, the use of fewer varactor diodes is desirable.
A 2.8 GHz to 4.8 GHz beam steering microstrip antenna for radar applications is introduced in [15]. Beam steering is achieved with a pair of PIN diodes connecting the stubs to the ground and changing the state between On and Off. A single narrow bandwidth patch antenna is proposed in [5] which steers the beam by using complementary split ring resonators (CSRRs) as part of the ground plane. The antenna with double CSRR loading is able to steer the beam from −51° to 48°. A scan range up to 16° is obtained with an integrated 95 mm diameter lens antenna [16] in E-band. The beam is directed to different angles by switching between the feed elements of the array. Reference [2] presents a reconfigurable beam steering system comprising four patch antennas, three power dividers, and four phase shifters. A switched line PIN diode phase shifter is used for directing the beam between −30° to 30°. Reference [17] introduces a new approach to generate beam steering antenna systems without using phase shifters. A 4 × 4 planar circularly polarized spiral antenna array is designed and verified in a spherical coordinate system. As ϕ changes from 0 to 2π, the phase of the CP antenna’s co-pol radiation will change by 2π, while r and θ remain constant. A single layer SIW version of a 4 × 4 Butler matrix system is presented in [18], achieving scanning angles of ±25°. A broadband beam steering antenna for 5G applications is introduced in [4]. This design includes a 4 × 4 Butler matrix which applies progressive phase shift between microstrip antenna elements. Since a Butler matrix has some constant phase differences at the output, a signal can be directed only to some specific angles. Reference [6] demonstrates a new method of using band-pass filters as phase shifters or tunable filters by using coupled microstrip resonators loaded with a varactor diode in the filter structure. A 1 × 4 steerable dielectric resonator antenna array at C / X band is presented in [19]. Inkjet-printed barium strontium titanate (BST) thick-film is applied as phase shifters. Integrated metal-insulator-metal varactors are used for tuning the phase. This antenna system achieves a ±30° beam steering range.
Firstly, this paper proposes an SIW Ku-band variable phase shifter. This phase shifter is a combination of a 3 dB coupler with an isolation better than 30 dB at the mid-band frequency of 17 GHz and 22 dB in the entire operating bandwidth, with two varactor diodes as electrical phase control elements. Then, an antenna array consisting of two Vivaldi antennas is introduced for designing a beam steering antenna system. The proposed beam steering system is designed on a single SIW layer which makes it a low-profile structure with minimum losses. The system has a 2 GHz bandwidth with a reflection coefficient better than −10 dB between 16 GHz and 18 GHz and 50° controllable beam steering capability. Therefore, the design criteria consisting of reflection coefficient better than 10 dB, 10 dB gain, 50° scanning angle with cross polarization better than 20 dB, which are normally required for tracking systems and other possible scanning applications, are achieved successfully.

2. SIW Variable Phase Shifter

SIW phase shifters have the advantages of being compact, low loss, and planar which make them suitable for integration with other components on a single layer. Phase shifters are critical components in the mm-wave and microwave area for applications like phased array systems in radio astronomy, and beam steering systems for tracking applications in wireless and satellite communications. Phase shifters divide into two main groups: Fixed phase shifters and variable phase shifters. This paper’s focus is on the design of a variable SIW phase shifter.

2.1. SIW 3-dB Coupler

A hybrid coupler with high isolation and 3 dB coupling is designed on RT/duroid 6002 substrate with relative permittivity of 2.94, thickness of h = 0.508 mm, and loss tangent of 0.0012 [20]. The component is designed and simulated in CST Microwave Studio 2018. Figure 1 presents the SIW 3 dB coupler structure. The required coupling and isolation are achieved by optimizing the length of the gap in the middle, the location of the vias on both sides, and also the middle vias. As shown in Figure 2a, this design has a reflection coefficient better than −22 dB in the entire frequency range. It has an isolation between the adjacent ports of higher than 30 dB at mid-band frequency and 3 dB power division between 16 GHz and 18 GHz. Figure 2b demonstrates that the transmission coefficient, when including dielectric and metallic losses in the analysis, amounts to an insertion loss of less than 0.5 dB.

2.2. SIW Variable Phase Shifter

A reflection-type variable phase shifter is designed in this section, which consists of an SIW 3-dB coupler and the biasing circuit for the varactor diodes. Figure 3 shows the structure and parameters of the phase shifter. The phase shifter parameters including the coupler are designed based on the theoretical analysis introduced in [21]. The reader is referred to [21] for details. The waveguide width is designed based on the cutoff frequency [14], and the SIW width is defined by using the proposed formula in [22]. The d/p ratio is chosen as 0.65 to have minimum wave leakage in the SIW circuit. Table 1 presents the phase shifter’s dimensions.
Before applying the varactor diodes to the coupler introduced in Section 2.1, two capacitors are applied to ports 3 and 4 (Figure 1) to analyze the phase variation that can be obtained by this circuit. As revealed in Figure 4, by changing the capacitor value from 0.1 pF to 5 pF, a phase variation of about 125° is obtained. After 5 pF, the value of the capacitor is so high that it resembles a short circuit (about 2 Ω impedance), thus the phase variation saturates.
For this design, the silicon hyper abrupt junction varactor diode SMV2201-040LF [23] is chosen, which is specifically designed for wideband applications. For examining the performance of this diode, its equivalent circuit is modeled and analyzed in CST, which is demonstrated in Figure 5. A microstrip-to-SIW transition comprising a 50-Ω microstrip line and a tapered microstrip section as well as two parasitic compensation stubs with width W1 and length L1 (Figure 3) are applied to ports 3 and 4 of the coupler for achieving the required capacitance for a 125° phase shift. An inductor is inserted between the DC voltage and the varactor diode to provide a quasi-open circuit for the RF signal. Table 2 presents the relationship between the output phase of the phase shifter circuit and biasing voltage of the varactor diodes for a single-phase shifter. By increasing the biasing voltage from 0 to 20 V, a nonlinear variation of phase difference between 0° and 126° is achieved.
Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 demonstrate the performance of the variable phase shifter by applying 0 to 20 V biasing voltage to the circuit. While applying five different voltages, Figure 6 shows the reflection coefficient of the variable phase shifter which is better than −15 dB in all cases between 16 GHz and 18 GHz. The phase variation achieved by the equivalent circuit of the varactor diode is demonstrated in Figure 7 and verifies the 120° phase differences. Figure 8 presents the insertion loss of the proposed phase shifter, which improves from 11 dB to 3 dB by increasing the biasing voltage from 0 to 20 V.

3. SIW Beam Steering Antenna System

By using electrically variable phase shifters, we are able to change the phase of the signal in any individual antenna element in an array, which consequently steers the far-field radiation pattern of the array in space without the need for any mechanical rotation.

3.1. Vivaldi Antenna

An antipodal Vivaldi antenna is employed as the radiating element for this antenna system. It is designed based on the parametric study in [24], and then fine optimized [25] for performance in the required frequency band of 16 GHz to 18 GHz. The Vivaldi antenna is horizontally polarized, and vertical polarization is blocked by the comb-like corrugations on two arms of the antenna. Therefore, the corrugations improve cross polarization. The proposed antenna has a wide bandwidth with a reflection coefficient better than –15 dB in the entire operating bandwidth, as presented in Figure 9a. Its end-fire radiation pattern with high directivity is displayed in Figure 9b. This single antenna provides about 9.6 dB gain at mid-band frequency. The proposed Vivaldi antenna has a very directive radiation pattern with 50° HPBW, which consequently limits the scan range of the beam steering system to about 50°.

3.2. Beam Steering Antenna System

Beam steering is accomplished by applying a progressive phase shift between neighboring elements in an array. The proposed beam steering antenna system includes two variable phase shifters, an antenna array consisting of two Vivaldi antennas, and a 90° phase transition. A microstrip-to-SIW transition is designed for feeding the antenna system by K-connectors at ports 1 and 2. First, a 50-Ω microstrip line is designed based on principles explained in [26]. Then, it is tapered out for a better match. Figure 10 demonstrates the entire beam steering antenna system.
A SIW 90° phase transition is applied between the 3-dB coupler and phase shifters. This transition causes 0° and 180° phase differences between the input ports of the right and left phase shifter when exciting port 1 and port 2, respectively [27]. Therefore, a 0° (sum) and 180° (difference) steering range is obtained by using this transition. Figure 11 displays the electric field distribution in the entire antenna system when port 1 is excited. As exhibited, minimum loss and no wave-leakage through the SIW transitions are accomplished.
In order to calculate the beam steering range of the system by considering a phase shifter with a maximum of 125° phase variation, the following formula is used [28]:
ψ = 360 f c ( [ d x + Δ x ] sin θ cos ϕ + d y sin θ sin ϕ )
where ψ is the phase shift between the elements, f is the frequency, c is the speed of light, dx and dy are x- and y-element spacing, Δx is the row offset for a non-rectangular lattice, and θ and ϕ are the beam steering angles.
As revealed in [23], by applying 0 to 20 V bias to the varactor diode, its capacitance changes between 0.23 pF and 2.1 pF. The gain pattern of the beam steering antenna system is presented in Figure 12 at mid-band frequency of 17 GHz, while port 1 is excited and port 2 is terminated. As expected by applying the same biasing voltage to both right and left phase shifters, a signal with a 180° phase difference feeds the Vivaldi antennas which consequently causes a deep null in the broad-sight direction of the antenna.
Figure 13 presents the gain pattern of the antenna system for five different loadings when port 2 is excited and port 1 is terminated. Due to the 90° transition by exciting port 2, signals go through the SIW phase shifters with 180° phase differences. Therefore, by applying the same voltage to the right and left phase shifters, another 180° phase difference is added to the signal which causes a directive radiation pattern in the broad-sight direction of the system.
By considering the progressive phase shift between the individual antennas by exciting port 1 and port 2, a beam steering range from −25° to +25° is obtained, which verifies the calculated value by using Equation (1).

4. Experimental Results

The proposed SIW antenna system is fabricated on a single layer of RT/duroid 6002. The top and bottom views of the fabricated prototype and details of the phase shifter circuit are displayed in Figure 14. Two end launch K-connectors are used for exciting the ports. Four varactor diodes are soldered to the board between the microstrip and compensation stubs. Two inductors are placed in series with the varactor diodes and DC voltage supply which can be replaced by chip inductors.
For performance verification, the antenna system is measured in a far-field anechoic chamber using an Anritsu 37397C vector network analyzer. Figure 15 presents both simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the beam steering antenna system for ports 1 and 2. The reflection coefficient is better than −10 dB in the entire frequency range, and measurements show a fairly good agreement with simulation results.
The far-field radiation pattern of this antenna system is measured for three different loadings for performance confirmation. V1 and V2 are the biasing voltages applied to the left and right phase shifters, respectively. First, V1 = 0 V and V2 = 20 V are applied, which steers the null to −8°, then V1 = 20 V and V2 = 10 V are applied, which steers the null to 5°, and finally V1 = V2 = 20 V is applied, which has the null at 0° and the main lobes at ± 25° which are shown in Figure 16.
The co and cross polarization of this antenna system are measured by exciting port 2, terminating port 1, and applying the 20 V biasing voltage to both phase shifters. Figure 17 demonstrates the comparison between the measured and simulated results. The measurements are in good agreement with simulations. This antenna system provides a cross polarization better than 20 dB in the entire beam steering range.
Finally, Figure 18 demonstrates the scanning range of the antenna system. By increasing the biasing voltage of the varactor diodes from 0 to 20 V, a progressive phase shift is provided and applied to the antennas to steer the beam, resulting in 50° scanning ranges from −25° to 25°. Table 3 and Table 4 present a comparison between seven recent antenna systems and our proposed design in terms of gain, phase shifter type, polarization, bandwidth, scan range, and number of antenna elements. As is shown, the proposed system in this paper provides a fairly wide scan range and good gain despite the fact that only two antenna elements are used when compared to other systems, which use four antennas.
The antenna efficiency represents the ratio between the total co-polarized radiated power to the input power accepted by the system. This calculation provides an antenna efficiency of 78.89% at the mid-band frequency of 17 GHz which demonstrates a very good performance of the proposed beam steering system.

5. Conclusions

A substrate integrated waveguide beam steering antenna system is presented for Ku-band applications. The system uses two reflection-type variable phase shifters, a 3-dB coupler with additional phase transition for creating sum or difference patterns, and two Vivaldi antennas. The entire structure is designed on a single substrate layer which makes it compact, low loss, and low profile. Four varactor diodes are used as electrical steering control elements. Experimental results are in good agreement with simulations, thus verifying the design approach.

Author Contributions

S.S.H. and J.B. conceived the initial designs of the phase shifters, Vivaldi antennas, coupler and 90° phase transition. S.S.H. designed the circuits and experiments, performed the experiments and wrote the first draft of the paper, which both authors finalized.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ding, Y.; Wu, K. Varactor-tuned substrate integrated waveguide phase shifter. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Baltimore, MA, USA, 5–10 June 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Errifi, H.; Baghdad, A.; Badri, A.; Sahel, A. Electronically reconfigurable beam steering array antenna using switched line phase shifter. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), Rabat, Morocco, 1–4 November 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Djerafi, T.; Fonseca, N.J.G.; Wu, K. Planar Ku-band 4 × 4 Nolen matrix in SIW technology. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2010, 58, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khattak, M.K.; Salman Khattak, M.; Rehman, A.; Lee, C.; Han, D.; Park, H.; Kahn, S. A flat, broadband and high gain beam-steering antenna for 5G communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), Phuket, Thailand, 30 October–2 November 2017; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao, W.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, A.; Yu, T.; Guo, D. A low-cost compact patch antenna with beam steering based on CSRR-loaded ground. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 1520–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bousbia, L.; Ould-Elhassen, M.; Mabrouk, M.; Ghazel, A. New synthesis of tunable filter and phase shifter used for phased array antennas applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS), Marrakech, Morocco, 14–16 April 2014; pp. 1348–1353. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma, S.; Yang, G.-H.; Meng, F.-Y.; Ding, X.-M.; Zhang, K.; Fu, J.-H.; Wu, Q. Electrically tunable array antenna with beam steering from backfire to endfire based on liquid crystal miniaturized phase shifter. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), Miami, FL, USA, 13–16 November 2016; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zheng, Y.; Saavedra, C.E. Full 360° vector-sum phase-shifter for microwave system applications. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2009, 57, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asoodeh, A.; Mojtaba, A. A full 360° vector-sum phase shifter with very low RMS phase error over a wide bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2012, 60, 1626–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, Z.; Ran, L.; Li, C. A K-band portable FMCW radar with beamforming array for short-range localization and vital-Doppler targets discrimination. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 3443–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sellal, K.; Talbi, L.; Nedil, M. Design and implementation of a controllable phase shifter using substrate integrated waveguide. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2012, 6, 1090–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muneer, B.; Qi, Z.; Xu, S. A broadband tunable multilayer substrate integrated waveguide phase shifter. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2015, 25, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sbarra, E.; Marcaccioli, L.; Gatti, R.V.; Sorrentino, R. Ku-band analogue phase shifter in SIW technology. In Proceedings of the 2009 European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Rome, Italy, 29 September–1 October 2009; pp. 264–267. [Google Scholar]
  14. Formiga Mamedes, D.; Esmaeili, M.; Bornemann, J. K-band substrate integrated waveguide variable phase shifter. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 10–15 April 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Park, Z.; Lin, J. A beam-steering broadband microstrip antenna for noncontact vital sign detection. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ala-Laurinaho, J.; Karttunen, A.; Räisänen, A.V. A mm-wave integrated lens antenna for E-band beam steering. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Lisbon, Portugal, 13–17 April 2015; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yao, Y.-L.; Zhang, F.-S.; Zhang, F. A new approach to design circularly polarized beam-steering antenna arrays without phase shift circuits. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 2018, 66, 2354–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bartlett, C.; Salem Hesari, S.; Bornemann, J. End-fire substrate integrated waveguide beam-forming system for 5G applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 18th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM), Waterloo, ON, Canada, 19–22 August 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nikfalazar, M.; Mehmood, A.; Sohrabi, M.; Mikolajek, M.; Wiens, A.; Maune, H.; Kohler, C.; Binder, J.R.; Jakoby, R. Steerable dielectric resonator phased-array antenna based on inkjet-printed tunable phase shifter with BST metal-insulator-metal varactors. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kordiboroujeni, Z.; Bornemann, J.; Sieverding, T. Mode-matching design of substrate-integrated waveguide couplers. In Proceedings of the 2012 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Singapore, 21–24 May 2012; pp. 701–704. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kordiboroujeni, Z.; Bornemann, J. Design of substrate integrated waveguide components using mode-matching techniques. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Numerical Electromagnetic and Multiphysics Modeling and Optimization (NEMO), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 11–14 August 2015; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kordiboroujeni, Z.; Bornemann, J. Designing the width of substrate integrated waveguide structures. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2013, 23, 518–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Skyworks. SMV2201-SMV2205 Series: Surface Mount, 0402 Silicon Hyperabrupt Tuning Varactor Diodes Data Sheet. 2012. Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=books&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwih-pbo7cXkAhVVeXAKHboTAykQFjAAegQIABAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skyworksinc.com%2Fuploads%2Fdocuments%2F201953A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw02zMwJrKKzwrIhnLSz5yfD (accessed on 26 July 2019).
  24. Locke, L.S.; Bornemann, J.; Claude, S. Substrate integrated waveguide-fed tapered slot antenna with smooth performance characteristics over an ultra-wide bandwidth. ACES J. 2013, 28, 454–462. [Google Scholar]
  25. Salem Hesari, S.; Bornemann, J. Frequency-selective substrate integrated waveguide front-end system for tracking applications. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2018, 12, 1620–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Balanis, C.A. Antenna Theory—Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cheng, Y.; Hong, W.; Wu, K. Novel substrate integrated waveguide fixed phase shifter for 180-degree directional coupler. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 3–8 June 2007; pp. 189–192. [Google Scholar]
  28. CST. Application Note CST STUDIO SUITE™ 2006B: Antenna Arrays. 2012. Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjRlru778XkAhWYHXAKHeFKDusQFjABegQIBhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fperso.telecom-paristech.fr%2Fbegaud%2Fintra%2FCST_ANTENNAARRAY.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0UxlbJD3SHsaJahJQ2HgwM (accessed on 26 July 2019).
Figure 1. Substrate integrated waveguide 3 dB coupler.
Figure 1. Substrate integrated waveguide 3 dB coupler.
Electronics 08 01013 g001
Figure 2. Scattering parameters of the 3 dB coupler, (a) ideal, (b) S21 = S31 with dielectric and metal losses included compared to lossless analysis.
Figure 2. Scattering parameters of the 3 dB coupler, (a) ideal, (b) S21 = S31 with dielectric and metal losses included compared to lossless analysis.
Electronics 08 01013 g002
Figure 3. SIW variable phase shifter structure and parameters.
Figure 3. SIW variable phase shifter structure and parameters.
Electronics 08 01013 g003
Figure 4. Phase variation of the 3-dB coupler by applying different capacitance values at ports 3 and 4.
Figure 4. Phase variation of the 3-dB coupler by applying different capacitance values at ports 3 and 4.
Electronics 08 01013 g004
Figure 5. Schematic part of the SIW variable phase shifter and equivalent circuits of the varactor diodes.
Figure 5. Schematic part of the SIW variable phase shifter and equivalent circuits of the varactor diodes.
Electronics 08 01013 g005
Figure 6. Reflection coefficient of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Figure 6. Reflection coefficient of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Electronics 08 01013 g006
Figure 7. Phase variation of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Figure 7. Phase variation of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Electronics 08 01013 g007
Figure 8. Insertion loss of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Figure 8. Insertion loss of the SIW variable phase shifter for five different biasing voltages.
Electronics 08 01013 g008
Figure 9. SIW Vivaldi antenna, (a) reflection coefficient, (b) far-field radiation pattern at 17 GHz.
Figure 9. SIW Vivaldi antenna, (a) reflection coefficient, (b) far-field radiation pattern at 17 GHz.
Electronics 08 01013 g009
Figure 10. Beam steering antenna system.
Figure 10. Beam steering antenna system.
Electronics 08 01013 g010
Figure 11. Electric field distribution in SIW beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz when port 1 is excited.
Figure 11. Electric field distribution in SIW beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz when port 1 is excited.
Electronics 08 01013 g011
Figure 12. Simulated gain patterns of the beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz for 5 different loadings while port 1 is excited.
Figure 12. Simulated gain patterns of the beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz for 5 different loadings while port 1 is excited.
Electronics 08 01013 g012
Figure 13. Simulated gain pattern of the beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz for 5 different loadings while port 2 is excited.
Figure 13. Simulated gain pattern of the beam steering antenna system at 17 GHz for 5 different loadings while port 2 is excited.
Electronics 08 01013 g013
Figure 14. Beam steering antenna system prototype, (a) top view, (b) bottom view, (c) details of the phase shifter circuit.
Figure 14. Beam steering antenna system prototype, (a) top view, (b) bottom view, (c) details of the phase shifter circuit.
Electronics 08 01013 g014aElectronics 08 01013 g014b
Figure 15. Measured and simulated reflection coefficients of the beam steering antenna system.
Figure 15. Measured and simulated reflection coefficients of the beam steering antenna system.
Electronics 08 01013 g015
Figure 16. Measured and simulated far-field radiation pattern of the antenna system while exciting port 1 with (a) V1 = 0 V and V2 = 20 V, (b) V1 = 20 V and V2 = 10 V, (c) V1 = V2 = 20 V.
Figure 16. Measured and simulated far-field radiation pattern of the antenna system while exciting port 1 with (a) V1 = 0 V and V2 = 20 V, (b) V1 = 20 V and V2 = 10 V, (c) V1 = V2 = 20 V.
Electronics 08 01013 g016aElectronics 08 01013 g016b
Figure 17. Co-pol and cross pol of the beam steering antenna system when exciting port 2 and applying V1 = V2 = 20 V at mid-band frequency of 17 GHz.
Figure 17. Co-pol and cross pol of the beam steering antenna system when exciting port 2 and applying V1 = V2 = 20 V at mid-band frequency of 17 GHz.
Electronics 08 01013 g017
Figure 18. 50° scan range provided by changing the biasing voltage of the varactor diodes from 0 V to 20 V.
Figure 18. 50° scan range provided by changing the biasing voltage of the varactor diodes from 0 V to 20 V.
Electronics 08 01013 g018
Table 1. Dimensions of the SIW variable phase shifter.
Table 1. Dimensions of the SIW variable phase shifter.
ParameterDimension (mm)ParameterDimension (mm)
p1W16
d0.65W23
L11.5W318.6
L229.46W46.508
h0.508aSIW7
Table 2. Phase shifter angle and capacitance as a function of biasing voltage.
Table 2. Phase shifter angle and capacitance as a function of biasing voltage.
Voltage (V)Capacitor (pF)Phase Shifter Angle (degree)
02.100
50.6745.51
100.3375.92
150.26106.34
200.23126.02
Table 3. Comparison of seven recent beam steering antenna systems with our design in terms of phase shifter type, bandwidth, and number of elements.
Table 3. Comparison of seven recent beam steering antenna systems with our design in terms of phase shifter type, bandwidth, and number of elements.
Antenna SystemNumber of Antenna ElementsPhase Shifter/ModeBandwidth (GHz)
[2]FourPIN diode/variable9.88–10.2
[3]FourNolan matric/fixed12.25–12.75
[4]FourButler matrix/fixed27–29
[5]OneCSRR/fixed1.98–2.05
[12]OnePIN diode/fixed2.8–4.8
[15]Four4 × 4 Butler matrix/fixed23–27
[16]FourMetal-insulator-metal Varactor/variable7–8.4
Our workTwoVaractor diode/variable16–18
Table 4. Comparison of seven recent beam steering antenna systems with our design in terms of gain, scan range, and polarization.
Table 4. Comparison of seven recent beam steering antenna systems with our design in terms of gain, scan range, and polarization.
Antenna SystemGain [dBi]Scan Angle (degree)Polarization
[2]15−30 to +30Linear
[3]Not measuredPort 1/−5.3 to −15.3
Port 2/28.7 to 38.3
Port 3/6.9 to 16.2
Port 4/−27.7 to −40.7
Linear
[4]11−35 to +35Linear
[5]Not measured−51 to +48Linear
[12]5.47Various in different frequencies.Linear
[15]8.7–11.7−25 to +25Linear
[16]13−30 to +30Linear
Our work10.7−25 to +25Linear

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salem Hesari, S.; Bornemann, J. Design of a SIW Variable Phase Shifter for Beam Steering Antenna Systems. Electronics 2019, 8, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091013

AMA Style

Salem Hesari S, Bornemann J. Design of a SIW Variable Phase Shifter for Beam Steering Antenna Systems. Electronics. 2019; 8(9):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salem Hesari, Sara, and Jens Bornemann. 2019. "Design of a SIW Variable Phase Shifter for Beam Steering Antenna Systems" Electronics 8, no. 9: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop