Next Article in Journal
Channel Length Biasing for Improving Read Margin of the 8T SRAM at Near Threshold Operation
Previous Article in Journal
A Fast Algorithm for Multi-Class Learning from Label Proportions
Open AccessArticle

iLife: Safely Extending Lifetime for Memory-Oriented SSD

by Erci Xu 1,* and Shanshan Li 2
1
Engineering Center of Foundational Software, College of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2
Department of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2019, 8(6), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8060610
Received: 26 April 2019 / Revised: 21 May 2019 / Accepted: 28 May 2019 / Published: 30 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Computer Science & Engineering)
Currently, the roles of SSDs have been diversified significantly. Apart for storage purposes, users can also utilize flash drives to cache hot data or buffering incoming writes to achieve high throughput. In this case, the endurance study of Solid State Drives (SSDs) has become an increasingly important topic as users rely on such research to reliably avoid early retirement of their old drives in laptops or machines in data centers. However, current manufacturers adopt Program/Erase (P/E) cycle-based life indicators to estimate the remaining lifetime of an SSD, which is often too conservative due to longtime data retention concerns. In this paper, we begin by analyzing the inaccuracy and other potential issues of existing P/E cycle-based life indicators for SSDs under memory-oriented workloads. To construct an accurate life indicator, we conduct a more extensive and sophisticated experiment to wear out eight SSDs from four different vendors. By monitoring the device status extracted from the standard S.M.A.R.T.attributes in the experiment, we make eleven interesting findings on the relationship between the device lifetime and different types of errors observed. Based on our unique findings, we propose iLife, a pattern-based life indicator for SSDs under memory-oriented workloads. Our evaluation of iLife on a different set of six SSDs shows that iLife is a more accurate life indicator, with an average of 14.2% higher accuracy on lifetime estimation and up to 21.2% safe lifetime extension compared to existing P/E cycle-based indicators. View Full-Text
Keywords: SSD; endurance; reliability SSD; endurance; reliability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, E.; Li, S. iLife: Safely Extending Lifetime for Memory-Oriented SSD. Electronics 2019, 8, 610.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop