3.1. B-H-Loop and Saturation Flux Density
When analyzing temperature-dependent B-H curves for applications in power electronics, the most relevant parameters are the saturation flux density, permeability, coercive field strength, and hysteresis losses, as these directly affect inductance, core losses, energy storage capability, and the risk of magnetic saturation. Due to the limited output power of the amplifier and the inherently low permeability of powder cores, the saturation flux analysis was confined to ferrite and nanocrystalline materials. For powder-based cores, due to the gap distributed through the material, the gradual transition into saturation prevents a meaningful representation of the hysteresis loop up to full saturation.
Figure 4 shows the
B-H loops at different temperatures for nanocrystalline and ferrite core materials. The color scale ranges from red (25 °C) to dark purple (−196 °C). The increase in saturation flux density with decreasing temperature observed in Finemet, Vitroperm, and MnZn-ferrites arises from the enhancement of the saturation magnetization due to spin-wave excitation at low temperatures, as described by Bloch’s law [
17,
18,
19]. This reduction in thermal fluctuations allows for greater alignment of the magnetic moments. While Finemet and Vitroperm exhibit only a modest increase in saturation flux density at cryogenic temperatures—approximately 10% and 7% at −194 °C, respectively—MnZn-ferrite shows a markedly stronger increase of approximately 40%. In contrast, NiZn-ferrite displays a non-monotonic behavior: The saturation flux density initially increases down to approximately −50 °C, but then decreases again at temperatures below −100 °C. The physics underlying this non-monotonic behavior is likely governed by complex, material-specific cryogenic effects and requires dedicated investigation beyond the scope of the present study.
As shown in
Figure 4a,b, the nanocrystalline materials exhibit relatively low coercive fields and only a weak dependence on temperature. Their ultrafine grains are strongly exchange-coupled, which averages out local magnetic anisotropies and effectively suppresses magnetoelastic effects due to their extremely low magnetostriction [
20]. As a result, the coercivity of nanocrystalline materials varies only slightly with temperature, and their core losses exhibit a comparatively low temperature dependence over the investigated range.
In contrast, both ferrite materials show a much stronger temperature dependence of coercive field, as illustrated in
Figure 4c,d. With decreasing temperature, the coercive field increases significantly. This leads to a pronounced broadening of the hysteresis loop and greater energy dissipation per cycle. Consequently, the core losses of ferrites rise markedly at low temperatures. These observations, based on the visual evaluation of the
B-H characteristics of both core types, provide an initial qualitative understanding of their magnetic behavior at low temperatures. While nanocrystalline materials maintain thermal stable and efficient magnetic properties, ferrites exhibit pronounced deterioration in performance with decreasing temperature.
The following subsections present a detailed quantitative analysis of all investigated core materials and their dependence on frequency, flux density, and temperature.
3.2. Specific Core Loss and Steinmetz Parameters Under Sinusoidal Excitation
During periodic magnetization, soft magnetic materials exhibit energy losses that primarily depend on temperature , the magnetic flux density amplitude , and the excitation frequency . In this study, all measurements are restricted to sinusoidal excitation. Minimizing these losses is a key requirement for achieving high efficiency in inductive components, particularly under cryogenic conditions.
A comprehensive investigation of specific core losses was performed over a temperature range from room temperature down to −194 °C for representative soft magnetic materials, including ferrites, nanocrystalline alloys, and powder cores. Core losses originate from a combination of magnetic and electrically induced dissipation mechanisms and are governed by the excitation conditions—frequency, flux density, and waveform—as well as by temperature and intrinsic material properties. While hysteresis and eddy-current losses typically dominate, their temperature dependence varies significantly among different material classes, resulting in strongly material-specific loss behavior.
Figure 5 and
Figure 6 present the measured specific core losses
(in mW/cm
3) as a function of magnetic flux density for excitation frequencies between 50 kHz and 400 kHz, shown as sets of curves in double-logarithmic plots. Measured data points are indicated by circular markers, while manufacturer-provided room-temperature loss data are included as dashed black lines for reference where available. In the double-logarithmic representation, the slope of each curve directly reflects the power-law dependence of the losses on the magnetic flux density at a given excitation frequency.
To quantitatively describe the temperature-dependent loss behavior, the measured loss density
was modeled using a local, temperature-dependent extension of the Steinmetz equation,
Here, the excitation frequency
and the peak flux density
are normalized to the reference values
= 100 kHz and
= 50 mT. This normalization yields a scalable formulation that allows the loss behavior of different materials to be described consistently over a wide range of operating conditions through temperature-dependent Steinmetz parameters. The temperature dependence of the loss behavior is captured by the Steinmetz prefactor
, representing the reference loss power density at the operating point
and
, as well as by the frequency and flux-density exponents
and
, respectively. All three parameters were treated as temperature-dependent quantities and were extracted by locally fitting the measured loss data at each temperature using a least-squares method. As illustrated in
Figure 5 and
Figure 6, the fitted curves closely match the experimental data over the investigated excitation conditions.
The temperature dependence of the extracted Steinmetz parameters is summarized in
Figure 7; the numerical values of the reference loss coefficient
are provided in
Table A1 in the
Appendix A.
Figure 7a shows that the Steinmetz prefactor
, exhibits the strongest temperature dependence among all fitted parameters and increases with decreasing temperature in a strongly material-specific manner. Ferrite materials show a pronounced increase toward cryogenic temperatures. MnZn-ferrite exhibits the strongest temperature sensitivity, with
increasing by nearly one order of magnitude between 25 °C and −194 °C. NiZn-ferrite follows the same general trend, albeit less pronounced, with a substantial increase below −50 °C, and reaching a factor of approximately four at −150 °C.
In contrast, nanocrystalline materials exhibit very low absolute values of and only weak temperature dependence. Over the entire investigated temperature range, varies by less than 25% for Finemet and 50% for Vitroperm 500 F, remaining within approximately 10–17 mW/cm3. This behavior indicates a high thermal stability of the dominant loss mechanisms.
Powder core materials show intermediate behavior with pronounced material-specific differences. MPP and XFlux exhibit comparatively moderate increases of toward cryogenic temperatures (approximately 20–30%), whereas Edge and High Flux show stronger temperature sensitivity with increases of roughly 40–80%. The strongest temperature dependence among the powder cores is observed for Kool Mµ Hf and Kool Mµ MAX, for which increases by factors of approximately 3–4 at cryogenic temperatures. The results highlight the importance of explicitly accounting for the temperature dependence of in loss modeling.
The frequency exponent
, shown in
Figure 7b, exhibits weaker but still material-dependent temperature variations. For MnZn-ferrite,
decreases significantly from approximately 1.41 at 25 °C to nearly 1.0 at −194 °C, whereas NiZn-ferrite remains nearly temperature invariant, decreasing only slightly from approximately 1.1 to 1.0. Nanocrystalline materials exhibit high and remarkably stable
values (approximately 1.65–1.75). Among powder cores, the temperature dependence of
is strongly material-specific. XFlux (
≈ 1.38) and MPP (
≈ 1.48) show nearly temperature-independent frequency exponents, whereas Kool Mµ H
f and Kool Mµ MAX exhibit relatively low absolute
values (approximately 1.2–1.3) with only weak temperature dependence. In contrast, Edge and High Flux show a strong increase of
from ≈1.35 at 25 °C close to 1.6 at −194 °C. For MnZn-ferrite as well as Edge and High Flux powder cores, assuming a temperature-invariant frequency exponent
can lead to substantial deviations in frequency-dependent loss prediction, demonstrating that the temperature dependence of
must be explicitly considered for reliable modeling. For MnZn ferrite, neglecting the temperature dependence of
—which decreases strongly from 1.41 at 25 °C to about 1.0 at −194 °C (Δ
≈ 0.4)—results in relative loss deviations of approximately 30–80% at moderate frequencies up to 100 kHz and can exceed 100% at higher frequencies. Similarly, for the Edge and High Flux operating cases, the increase of
toward cryogenic temperatures (Δ
≈ 0.15–0.25) leads—when its temperature dependence is neglected—to relative loss deviations of 10–40%, depending on the operating frequency. Deviations at the lower end of this range (about 10–20% for Δ
< 0.15) are comparable to typical measurement uncertainties and may therefore be of limited practical relevance.
The flux density exponent
, shown in
Figure 7c, characterizes the non-linear scaling of losses with magnetic flux density. For MnZn-ferrite,
decreases from approximately 2.57 at 25 °C to about 2.25 at −194 °C, while NiZn-ferrite shows no monotonic increase toward cryogenic temperatures; instead,
remains near 2.5 down to −50 °C and then decreases to approximately 2.0 at lower temperatures. Nanocrystalline materials exhibit the highest thermal stability, maintaining
values close to 2.0 across the entire investigated temperature range. For the powder cores,
varies only moderately but remains clearly material-specific. Edge and High Flux exhibit the highest
values (
≈ 2.33–2.38 and ≈2.30–2.34), XFlux the lowest and most temperature-stable behavior (
≈ 2.14), and MPP an intermediate level (
≈ 2.28). Kool Mµ H
f and Kool Mµ MAX show a weak but systematic increase of
toward cryogenic temperatures (
≈ 2.05 to ≈2.26 and ≈2.12 to ≈2.22, respectively). Similar to
, assuming a constant
can introduce noticeable modeling errors. Variations of Δ
≈ 0.1 generally cause loss deviations within the measurement uncertainty, while larger changes of Δ
≈ 0.2 can result in deviations of up to 50% and must therefore be considered in loss modeling.
To enable a direct comparison of the thermal stability of materials with substantially different absolute loss magnitudes, the measured core losses were first normalized to their corresponding room-temperature values, i.e.,
. The resulting normalized values exhibit only a weak dependence on the magnetic flux density, typically within ±5%. For each excitation frequency and temperature, these normalized losses were therefore averaged over the investigated flux density range to obtain a flux-density-independent representation of the temperature dependence. This procedure yields a normalized loss factor
, which is presented in
Figure 8 and
Figure 9.
This normalized representation directly reflects the combined effect of the temperature-dependent Steinmetz parameters discussed above and allows relative loss changes at reduced temperatures to be derived from room-temperature loss values commonly provided in manufacturer datasheets. Across all investigated materials, cooling to −194 °C leads to an increase in total core losses; however, the magnitude and frequency dependence of this increase differ substantially between material classes.
Ferrite materials exhibit the strongest temperature-induced loss increase. At 100 kHz, total losses rise by approximately a factor of 16–22 for MnZn-ferrite and 7–9 for NiZn-ferrite compared to room temperature. This behavior is consistent with the strong increase in the Steinmetz prefactor
and the pronounced reduction in the frequency exponent
, as well as with the substantial rise in coercivity observed in the
B-H loops (see
Figure 4). In addition, as shown in
Table 2, the permeability decreases nonlinearly at cryogenic temperatures, further confirming the severe magnetic degradation of ferrites at low temperatures.
In contrast, nanocrystalline alloys such as Finemet and Vitroperm exhibit only modest increases in normalized core losses when cooled to −194 °C. The loss curves at different excitation frequencies remain tightly clustered, indicating weak temperature sensitivity. This behavior directly reflects the high thermal stability of the fitted Steinmetz parameters, in particular the nearly temperature-invariant values of and , as well as the only moderate increase in coercivity (from 12.2 to 14.3 A/m for Finemet and from 12.6 to 17.1 A/m for Vitroperm between 25 °C and −194 °C). Quantitatively, total losses increase by only 20–30% for Finemet and 40–60% for Vitroperm, with the smallest relative increases occurring at higher excitation frequencies.
Powder-core materials show intermediate behavior with pronounced material-specific differences. XFlux and MPP exhibit only moderate increases in normalized losses (approximately 25–30%), consistent with their relatively stable Steinmetz parameters. Edge and High Flux display a stronger frequency dependence, with loss increases becoming more pronounced at higher frequencies. In contrast, Kool Mµ Hf and Kool Mµ MAX exhibit the strongest temperature sensitivity among the powder cores, with normalized losses increasing by factors of approximately 3–5 at cryogenic temperatures. These trends are in good agreement with the temperature dependence of the Steinmetz prefactor and, to a lesser extent, the frequency exponent α(T).
3.3. Permeability Under Sinusoidal Excitation (No DC Bias)
While
Section 3.2 focused on the temperature-dependent loss mechanisms and their empirical description using Steinmetz parameters, the present section addresses the thermal stability of the magnetic permeability under purely sinusoidal excitation without DC bias. The permeability determines the inductive behavior of magnetic components and therefore represents a key functional parameter, complementary to the loss characteristics.
Table 2 summarizes the normalized permeability factors K
µ = µ(T)/µ(25 °C) of the investigated materials, measured at 100 kHz and referenced to their room-temperature values. A clear distinction between the different material classes is observed.
Ferrite materials exhibit the strongest temperature dependence. The normalized permeability of MnZn-ferrite (N87) decreases from 0.44 at −50 °C to only 0.06 at −194 °C, while the NiZn ferrite (Fair-Rite #61) shows a slight initial increase (up to 1.05), followed by a strong reduction to 0.21 over the same temperature range. This pronounced degradation confirms the strong sensitivity of ferrites to cryogenic operation and is consistent with the loss behavior discussed in
Section 3.2.
Nanocrystalline materials show significantly higher magnetic stability. Finemet maintains nearly constant permeability, decreasing only slightly from 1.03 at −50 °C to 0.95 at −194 °C. Vitroperm exhibits a steady, moderate reduction to approximately 0.80 at −194 °C. Despite this decrease, both materials retain high permeability across the entire temperature range, indicating robust magnetic performance under sinusoidal excitation.
Powder-core materials exhibit the highest thermal stability. XFlux, MPP, and Edge show virtually unchanged permeability at −194 °C, with normalized values remaining between 0.97 and 1.00. Kool Mµ Hf and Kool Mµ MAX show a moderately stronger reduction of approximately 7–10% but remain within acceptable limits.
From a practical perspective, permeability variations are most relevant for powder-core inductors, where the inductance scales directly with the effective permeability. In contrast, for ferrite and nanocrystalline materials used in gapped inductors or transformer cores, moderate changes in intrinsic permeability are typically of limited significance, as the effective inductance is dominated by the air gap or core geometry rather than by the material permeability itself.
3.4. Permeability and Core Losses Under DC Bias Condition
In practical power-electronic applications, magnetic components are frequently subjected to combined AC excitation and DC magnetization. Therefore, the following investigations focus on the behavior of permeability and core losses under DC bias at cryogenic temperatures. Based on the results of
Section 3.2 and
Section 3.3, the analysis is restricted to materials that exhibit sufficiently low losses and stable permeability under sinusoidal excitation, namely the powder-core materials High Flux, Edge, and MPP, as well as the nanocrystalline alloys Finemet and Vitroperm.
The DC bias behavior of these materials is fundamentally governed by their microstructure. Powder cores consist of insulated metal particles separated by air gaps, forming a distributed-gap structure that reduces the effective permeability but significantly delays magnetic saturation. Nanocrystalline ribbon cores, in contrast, exhibit very high initial permeability and contain no intrinsic air gap unless intentionally introduced, resulting in strong flux concentration and early onset of magnetic saturation under DC excitation.
Figure 10a illustrates the normalized permeability as a function of DC magnetizing field at 100 kHz. For the powder-core materials, only minor changes in permeability are observed between room temperature and −196 °C. High Flux exhibits the highest DC bias robustness, retaining approximately 90% of its permeability even at DC fields exceeding 8 kA/m. MPP maintains about 80% of its permeability up to approximately 5 kA/m and decreases more strongly at higher bias levels, while Edge shows intermediate behavior, retaining roughly 80% up to 8 kA/m.
Nanocrystalline toroidal cores show a markedly different response. As shown in
Figure 10b, the permeability decreases rapidly even at relatively low DC magnetizing fields of approximately 20 A/m, both at room temperature and at −196 °C. This behavior is consistent with datasheet specifications and reflects the absence of a distributed air gap.
Beyond permeability, the effect of DC bias on core losses is of primary relevance.
Figure 11 presents the measured core losses as a function of DC magnetizing field. For the powder-core materials, the losses at −196 °C remain nearly constant within approximately ±10% over the entire investigated DC bias range up to 8 kA/m, indicating that DC bias does not introduce additional loss mechanisms under cryogenic conditions. Among the powder cores, High Flux exhibits the highest absolute losses, while Edge and MPP show significantly lower loss levels.
Nanocrystalline materials, in contrast, exhibit a pronounced increase in core losses under DC bias at cryogenic temperatures. At a DC magnetizing field of 10 A/m and −196 °C, the losses of Finemet increase by approximately 40% relative to the zero-bias condition, while Vitroperm shows an increase exceeding 200%. This strong sensitivity further limits the applicability of ungapped nanocrystalline materials in DC-biased cryogenic applications.
3.5. Evaluation
The selection of magnetic core materials for high-efficiency cryogenic power-electronic applications requires a comprehensive evaluation that simultaneously considers the absolute magnitude of core losses, their temperature dependence, and the robustness of magnetic properties under DC bias. In particular, for aerospace and cryogenic applications, additional constraints such as volumetric efficiency, mass, and saturation capability must be accounted for. Materials with intrinsically high baseline losses remain unsuitable for high-efficiency operation, even if their relative temperature-induced variations are moderate. Conversely, materials with very low loss power densities at the reference operating point can remain viable despite a stronger relative temperature dependence, provided that their absolute loss levels remain sufficiently low.
Ferrite materials exhibit the most unfavorable behavior under cryogenic conditions. As demonstrated in
Section 3.2 and
Section 3.3, MnZn- and NiZn-ferrites exhibit at least an order-of-magnitude increase in core losses when cooled to −194 °C, along with a severe permeability reduction and a marked rise in coercivity. These coupled effects significantly degrade efficiency and magnetic performance and are fully consistent with prior literature. Consequently, ferrites are unsuitable for high-efficiency cryogenic power-electronic applications, regardless of whether the application is AC- or DC-dominated.
Nanocrystalline alloys, represented by Finemet and Vitroperm, exhibit fundamentally different behavior. Under purely AC excitation, both materials combine low absolute losses with excellent thermal stability, as confirmed by the temperature-dependent Steinmetz parameters and the normalized loss analysis. As illustrated in
Figure 12, their loss curves remain closely clustered over wide ranges of flux density and excitation frequency when cooled to −194 °C. Finemet shows particularly stable behavior at higher frequencies, while Vitroperm exhibits a somewhat stronger temperature dependence at lower frequencies. These trends correlate well with the only moderate increase in coercivity and the near-constant Steinmetz exponents. However, as shown in
Section 3.4, nanocrystalline materials exhibit a pronounced sensitivity to DC bias: even relatively small DC magnetizing fields cause a rapid reduction in permeability and a significant increase in losses, an effect that becomes more pronounced at cryogenic temperatures. Consequently, nanocrystalline alloys are well suited for AC-dominated applications such as transformers, but—in ungapped configurations—are inherently unsuitable for DC-biased inductors at both room and cryogenic temperatures.
Powder-core materials offer the most flexible design space for cryogenic inductors, as their distributed air-gap structure provides intrinsic DC bias robustness and enables the effective permeability to be engineered during material design. This allows a targeted trade-off between inductance, saturation capability, and core volume. From an inductor-design perspective, the key objectives are minimizing current ripple, avoiding magnetic saturation, and reducing total core losses. While higher inductance reduces current ripple and associated AC loss components, it inevitably increases the magnetic flux density within the core, thereby pushing the design closer to saturation. Consequently, the saturation flux density becomes a critical limiting parameter, particularly in compact and mass-constrained designs. Importantly, the total core loss is not governed by the specific loss density alone, but by the product of loss density and core volume. While higher inductance generally increases flux density and drives the core closer to saturation, materials with a higher saturation flux density shift this constraint to higher operating flux levels. As a result, they enable smaller core volumes and reduced mass, even if their specific loss density is moderately higher. Thus, in compact inductor designs, saturation flux density—not specific loss density alone—often determines the achievable system-level efficiency. At 25 °C, manufacturer-reported saturation flux densities for the investigated powder cores are approximately ≈ 0.8 T (MPP), ≈ 1.5 T (High Flux), and ≈ 1.5−1.6 T (Edge), whereas manufacturer-reported values at −196 °C are not available. In addition, full-saturation extraction at cryogenic temperature was not feasible in the present setup due to amplifier output-power limits and the gradual saturation transition of distributed-gap powder materials. Therefore, the size/weight discussion is based on room-temperature saturation headroom, while cryogenic comparison is based on measured core losses within the accessible operating range.
Within this material class, pronounced material-specific trade-offs are observed. Kool Mµ Hf and Kool Mµ MAX offer good DC bias stability and low material cost under ambient conditions; however, their strong temperature sensitivity leads to loss increases of up to factors of 3–5 at −194 °C. This pronounced degradation significantly limits their suitability for high-efficiency cryogenic applications despite their favorable room-temperature characteristics.
XFlux exhibits only moderate temperature sensitivity, with loss increases of approximately 25–30% across the investigated frequency range. Nevertheless, its intrinsically high loss power densities at the reference operating point—significantly exceeding those of all other investigated powder-core materials—result in high absolute loss densities, making it impractical for loss-critical and mass-limited aerospace applications.
High Flux provides high saturation capability and comparatively moderate temperature dependence; however, its substantially higher loss power densities at the reference operating point compared to Edge lead to significantly higher absolute losses at cryogenic temperatures, particularly at elevated frequencies, which limits its overall efficiency.
In contrast, MPP and Edge emerge as the most balanced powder-core solutions. Both materials combine comparatively low baseline losses with moderate temperature dependence and robust DC bias behavior. Their loss curves remain well separated from those of higher-loss powder cores over wide ranges of flux density and frequency, and, as shown in
Figure 12, their absolute losses converge to similar levels below −100 °C. At 25 °C, however, Edge provides substantially higher saturation headroom (
≈ 1.5−1.6 T) than MPP (≈0.8 T), which supports smaller core cross-sections and lower mass in compact designs. This advantage is particularly relevant for aerospace and cryogenic applications, where volumetric and gravimetric efficiency are critical. Although MPP is associated with higher material cost, cryogenic power-electronic systems are typically dominated by efficiency and mass considerations rather than by core material costs. Consequently, materials with slightly higher specific loss densities may still offer superior overall performance when their higher saturation capability enables significantly reduced core volume and total loss.