Next Article in Journal
Embedding-Dependent Performance of Variational Quantum Reinforcement Learning for Intrusion Detection Under Dimensionality Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Large-Scale Propagation Characterization of 2100 MHz 5G-R in Typical Railway-Line Scenarios Based on Passive Measurements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Analytical Model of Inertial Gait Parameters for the Development of Robotic Exoskeletons for Lower-Limb Rehabilitation

1
School of Information Convergence, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Computer Science, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA
3
Department of Industrial Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2026, 15(13), 2851; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132851
Submission received: 28 May 2026 / Revised: 22 June 2026 / Accepted: 25 June 2026 / Published: 30 June 2026

Abstract

Robotic lower-limb exoskeletons are an increasingly important tool in the rehabilitation of patients with motor impairments, and their effectiveness depends on how faithfully the device reproduces the natural gait pattern. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are widely used to acquire body-worn kinematic data for gait monitoring, but compact, interpretable models linking IMU-derived hip- and knee-flexion features to gait phase under exoskeleton-assisted conditions are still lacking. We collected gait data from two independent experiments: Experiment 1, 20 healthy adults (10 M, 10 F; 22.2 ± 1.9 years) walking freely on level ground, stairs and a ramp with seven Noraxon IMUs; and Experiment 2, six healthy adults (4 M, 2 F; 31.0 ± 8.9 years) walking with and without the Exowalk (HR-02) over-ground exoskeleton with five IMUs. Eight bilateral hip- and knee-flexion features were extracted, and a binary logistic-regression model with stance/swing as the dependent variable was fitted on Experiment 1 and externally cross-validated on Experiment 2. The model classified gait phases with an accuracy of 90.83% (sensitivity 87.50%, specificity 92.50%, positive predictive value 85.37%) on Experiment 1. External validation retained 91.7% accuracy during free walking but dropped to 41.7% under Exowalk-assisted walking, indicating that the device alters the inertial signature of gait. The findings identify swing-phase hip flexion and the minimum swing-phase knee flexion as the kinematic descriptors most predictive of gait phase, and provide quantitative design and control targets for next-generation IMU-instrumented lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeletons.
Keywords: lower-limb exoskeleton; inertial measurement unit; gait analysis; logistic regression; rehabilitation robotics; wearable sensing; hip flexion; knee flexion; machine learning lower-limb exoskeleton; inertial measurement unit; gait analysis; logistic regression; rehabilitation robotics; wearable sensing; hip flexion; knee flexion; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.K.; Kim, J.; Park, J. An Analytical Model of Inertial Gait Parameters for the Development of Robotic Exoskeletons for Lower-Limb Rehabilitation. Electronics 2026, 15, 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132851

AMA Style

Kim HK, Kim J, Park J. An Analytical Model of Inertial Gait Parameters for the Development of Robotic Exoskeletons for Lower-Limb Rehabilitation. Electronics. 2026; 15(13):2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hyun K., Jungyoon Kim, and Jaehyun Park. 2026. "An Analytical Model of Inertial Gait Parameters for the Development of Robotic Exoskeletons for Lower-Limb Rehabilitation" Electronics 15, no. 13: 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132851

APA Style

Kim, H. K., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2026). An Analytical Model of Inertial Gait Parameters for the Development of Robotic Exoskeletons for Lower-Limb Rehabilitation. Electronics, 15(13), 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop