Next Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Image Classification Using a Spectral-Cube Gated Harmony Network
Previous Article in Journal
High-Frequency Link Analysis of Enhanced Power Factor in Active Bridge-Based Multilevel Converters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grain Boundary Engineering for High-Mobility Organic Semiconductors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics

by
Giuliano Chiriacò
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Ettore Majorana”, Università di Catania, via S. Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sez. Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Electronics 2025, 14(17), 3552; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173552
Submission received: 6 August 2025 / Revised: 31 August 2025 / Accepted: 3 September 2025 / Published: 6 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Electronic Materials)

Abstract

We review recent experimental advances in non-equilibrium quantum materials, focusing on current- and light-driven systems, transient and metastable phases, and non-equilibrium steady states. Emphasis is placed on current-driven phases and photoinduced control of quantum orders such as superconductivity, charge density waves, and ferroelectricity. We briefly outline the most relevant experimental results and discuss implications for future quantum and electronic technologies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Quantum materials [1]—systems in which electronic correlations, topology, and lattice dynamics intertwine—form the basis of many cutting-edge technologies. While the exploration of their equilibrium phases has revealed a vast landscape of emergent phenomena such as high-temperature superconductivity, multiferroicity, and topological order, it is becoming increasingly evident that many more striking functionalities emerge when they are driven far from equilibrium.
In this context, ultrafast control of quantum materials [2] has emerged as a vibrant frontier in condensed matter physics and materials science, and is rapidly becoming a central strategy in the search for next-generation (quantum) electronic devices, see Figure 1. Time-dependent perturbations such as ultrafast laser pulses, THz electric fields, or applied currents can access transient or metastable states, often revealing hidden orders or unconventional behaviors absent in the equilibrium phase diagram. These include possible light-induced superconductivity in cuprates [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] or fullerides [19,20,21,22,23,24], ultrafast switching of ferroelectric phenomena [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], dynamical generation of charge density wave order [40,41,42,43,44,45] or excitonic order [46], and metal–insulator transitions induced by light pulses [47,48,49,50,51,52,53] or by steady currents [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78].
The potential of out-of-equilibrium approaches is twofold. On one hand, they provide a powerful tool to probe fundamental mechanisms—such as electron-phonon coupling, symmetry breaking, or correlation effects—by perturbing the system away from its steady state and tracking its dynamical response with high temporal resolution. On the other hand, they have impressive technological potential, as dynamically generated states open ultrafast, low-power pathways to controlling material properties on demand.
For example, coherent light pulses in the terahertz to mid-infrared range have been shown to selectively excite lattice vibrations or electronic transitions, thereby engineering material properties in a nonthermal fashion. In systems such as K 3 C 60 or cuprates, optical pulses have induced signatures of superconducting-like optical conductivity far above the equilibrium critical temperature [19,20]. Quantum devices based on photoinduced superconductivity could enable zero-resistance interconnects or switching elements that operate far above the equilibrium critical temperature, without the need for chemical doping or sustained cryogenics.
In some oxides, ferroelectric states have been induced on pico-seconds timescales [27]. Ultrafast control of polarization and domain walls in ferroelectric materials points to applications in non-volatile memory, logic devices, and neuromorphic computing, where switching speed and energy efficiency are critical.
From an applied perspective, these discoveries have the potential to shape new paradigms for electronic devices, whereby symmetry, topology, quantum correlations and electronic properties are modulated on demand via coherent driving. This can lead to a plethora of phenomena, including topologically protected currents, non-reciprocal transport, or Floquet-engineered quantum states, with potential applications in electronics, quantum information processing, and spintronics. Importantly, these functionalities are reversible and can be triggered selectively in time and space, opening the way to programmable material platforms.
The experimental realization of such states has been made possible by advances in ultrafast optical and electron spectroscopies [79], which allow sub-picosecond probing of structural, electronic, and magnetic dynamics. The ability to shape the temporal and spectral profile of the driving field—such as resonantly driving a phonon mode or exciting a specific charge transition—makes it possible to steer the system into tailored non-equilibrium regimes.
In this review, we present an overview of the most relevant experimental progress in this field, with an emphasis on light- and current-driven control of non-equilibrium phenomena in quantum materials. We review in particular light-induced superconductivity, ultrafast ferroelectric phenomena, and current-tuned metal–insulator transitions. We briefly review the experimental techniques used to investigate these phenomena, and focus on the most important breakthroughs and their impact on electronics. We highlight the implications of these phenomena for future electronic applications and identify the key challenges and opportunities in engineering non-equilibrium functionality in quantum materials.

2. Experimental Techniques for Ultrafast Phenomena

Investigating and controlling ultrafast dynamics in quantum materials demands advanced time-resolved probes capable of resolving changes in the electronic, structural, and magnetic degrees of freedom on femtosecond to picosecond timescales. Over the last two decades, a wide range of complementary experimental techniques has emerged, allowing impressive progress in our understanding of transient phenomena [2,79,80,81]. This section presents a brief overview of the most widely used approaches, organized by observable, see Figure 2.
Time-resolved optical pump–probe spectroscopies (TOS)—Optical pump–probe spectroscopy [81,82,83,84] has recently become a cornerstone of ultrafast science. In these experiments, a femtosecond laser pulse (pump) drives the system out of equilibrium, and a time-delayed pulse (probe) measures the transient changes in reflectivity or transmission. This approach measures changes in the dielectric function of the system, making it ideal for studying coherent phonons, transient states, and the dynamics and relaxation of hot carriers [85,86]—which has recently emerged as a way to probe directly non-equilibrium electron systems.
The frequency of the probe can be changed across a wide spectrum, ranging from optical probes—best suited for studying quasiparticle dynamics, electron-phonon coupling strength, and gap magnitudes—to THz probes, ideal for the investigation of low-energy phenomena such as collective modes, low-gap quasiparticles and superconducting phases.
More recently, the development of dual-delay schemes and rapid acquisition protocols has enabled correlation studies between different excitations. These techniques exploit sequences of pulses to generate frequency–frequency correlation maps [87,88], revealing anharmonicities and interactions between low-energy excitations that are otherwise not accessible, and disentangling the dynamics of electronic and vibrational modes.
Additionally, pump–probe spectroscopy that probe second harmonic generation (SHG) allow to investigate inversion symmetry breaking, enabling time-resolved tracking of ferroelectricity, charge ordering, and nematicity.
X-ray scattering—These scattering techniques take advantage of the small wavelength of X-rays to probe lattice structural dynamics, or changes in charge, spin, orbital electronic orders, with sub-picosecond resolution. Techniques include time-resolved X-ray diffraction (trXRD) [89] and time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering trRIXS [80,90].
Ultrafast Electron Probes—Ultrafast electron diffraction (UED) [91] provides direct access to atomic-scale dynamics, and is particularly well-suited to study lattice symmetry changes and electronic phases. In pump–UED experiments, a femtosecond laser excites the sample and a synchronized ultrafast electron pulse probes the transient diffraction pattern. The ability to track structural order parameters with femtometer-scale precision makes UED a powerful complement to optical probes.
A closely related technique, ultrafast scanning tunneling microscopy (USTM), combines ultrafast temporal resolution with spatially nanometer-resolved imaging. USTM enables visualization of photoinduced carrier diffusion and trapping at surfaces, and has been employed to study phase-separated systems or domain-structured materials [92,93,94,95,96,97].
Time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (trARPES)—Time-resolved ARPES [98,99,100,101,102] allows to study the band structure and the single particle spectral function with momentum resolution and with picosecond time resolution. It has been employed to study a plethora of electronic orders.
Time-resolved scanning near-field optical microscopy (trSNOM)—This technique [103] employs near field microscopy to beat the diffraction limit and provide a time and frequency-resolved imaging of the system with nanometer scale spatial resolution. It has been used to track the evolution of phase domains [104], photoinduced metal–insulator transitions [51,52,105] or study plasmon-polariton propagation [106].
Time-resolved transport—Ultrafast transport can be probed via photoconductive switches [107] and has been used to investigate a variety of phenomena from light-induced superconducting states to band topology engineering in graphene [24,108].
Summary—The ensemble of ultrafast experimental techniques available today enables comprehensive probing of quantum materials far from equilibrium. Optical and THz probes excel at capturing carrier and low-energy dynamics; electron-based techniques offer direct insight into band structure; X-ray methods deliver atomic-scale insight into lattice dynanics; scanning techniques offer space-resolved imaging. Importantly, multi-messenger setups combining optical and structural probes allow to disentangle the effects of electronic and lattice dynamics. Together, they form an increasingly powerful platform for understanding and engineering emergent phases in driven quantum matter.

3. Photoinduced Transient Phases

Non-equilibrium drives—especially ultrafast optical pulses—have opened access to electronic and structural phases in quantum materials that are hidden or unstable at equilibrium.
These transient phases may be accessed via several mechanisms. A prototypical mechanism is the pump-driven switching of criticality, where an ordered phase is induced by the pump; this is illustrated in Figure 3a. At equilibrium, the free energy landscape does not favor any broken-symmetry phase. Upon pumping, the energy landscape is modified to favor a symmetry-breaking order parameter, driving the system into an ordered state. This mechanism has been proposed to explain the appearance of photoinduced superconducting-like states in potassium fulleride [109,110,111] and for the enhancement of excitonic order [112].
In another scenario, see Figure 3b, the equilibrium free energy already presents competing ordered phases which may be metastable or degenerate with the equilibrium state. The pump excites the system into these phases, which may then live for a short or long time, depending on decay processes. This mechanism has been proposed to explain the emergence of charge density wave or ferroelectric order in several systems [27,42,113].
This section surveys key experimental developments in this area, focusing on light-induced superconductivity, light-enhanced charge density wave (CDW) order, and metastable ferroic or excitonic states. Each case offers insights into how non-equilibrium phases hold great potential for future electronic devices.

3.1. Photoactive Superconductivity

One of the most striking demonstrations of phase control via light is the manipulation of superconducting states via light pulses. Several experiments have showed that it is possible to manipulate existing superconducting behavior by exciting the system with light pulses [114,115,116,117,118]. The most remarkable result is the transient induction of superconducting-like behavior above the equilibrium critical temperature in strongly correlated materials, particularly cuprates [3] and alkali-doped fullerides [19], see Figure 4.

3.1.1. Cuprate Superconductors

The work by Fausti et al. [3] first demonstrated that intense mid-infrared pulses resonant with a lattice vibration could induce a transient Josephson plasma edge in the reflectivity of stripe-ordered La 1.675 Eu 0.2 Sr 0.125 CuO 4 . This result suggested coherent superconducting coupling along the c-axis far above the equilibrium superconducting transition temperature. Follow-up experiments in La 2 x Ba x CuO 4 (LBCO) [4,5,6,8,9,13], and YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6 + x (YBCO) cuprates [7,14,15,17,18], confirmed that the light-induced state exhibits features of superconductivity: a reflectivity edge, coherent interlayer coupling, and a suppression of charge order. On the other hand, an experiment in La 2 x Sr x CuO 4 (LSCO) [12] attributed the observed spectroscopic response to a photoinduced high-mobility metallic state rather than a superconducting state.
The mechanism proposed to explain the experiments involves non-linear phonon coupling [119]: the resonant excitation of anharmonically coupled phonons induces lattice distortions that transiently suppress competing stripe order. This idea, referred to as nonlinear phononics, was formalized in subsequent theoretical work and supported by trXRD experiments that directly observed melting of charge stripes [6].

3.1.2. Fulleride Superconductors: K 3 C 60

In a different class of materials, namely potassium-doped fullerides, Mitrano et al. [19] showed that mid-infrared excitation of K 3 C 60 induces a transient optical response characteristic of a superconducting state, even at temperatures far above the equilibrium T c (∼20 K). Reflectivity measurements in the THz regime indicated that the reflectivity saturates to one and the real part of the conductivity goes to zero for energies below ∼10 meV, indicating a superconducting gap. Moreover, the imaginary part of the conductivity diverges as ∼1/ ω , a behavior typical of superconductors. However, these observations are limited to the 1–10 meV range and are based on an extrapolation of raw data due to the differing penetration depths between pump and probe pulses.
Subsequent works revealed that the transient superconducting-like behavior could also be tuned via pressure [20], and that the photoinduced response was also visible in fluctuations [23] and ultrafast transport measurements [24].
Theoretical models linking these results to the emergence of a superconducting state have proposed several mechanism. Nonlinear phononics [21,109,110]—where the drive of an infrared active mode leads to a stationary displacement of a Raman phonon responsible for superconductivity—or a radiation-induced cooling of superconducting quasiparticles [120]. Other theories have disputed the superconducting nature of the non-equilibrium state, explaining it as a transient state with a negative conductivity [121,122]. Another explanation proposes that the experimental data are spurious results due to an extrapolation of raw data that ignores non-linear effects in the pump fluence, so that the superconducting state is actually a high mobility state induced by the drive [123,124].

3.1.3. Applications

Photoactive superconductivity holds great potential for future electronics, as it enables light-activated superconducting quantum devices. It suggests an architecture where electronic devices—which may be switching elements, transistors, or junctions—change state (e.g., from normal to superconducting, or vice versa) in response to light pulses rather than an electric gate or temperature, enabling reversible, ultrafast and energy efficient electrical processes. For example, a laser-triggered superconducting interconnect could conduct electrical signals with negligible resistance during the window of illumination, allowing high-speed, low-loss signal routing in integrated circuits. Similarly, photo-switchable superconducting junctions could act as logic or memory elements, toggling between normal resistive and superconducting states under light control, eliminating static power consumption and minimizing thermal dissipation.
This approach bypasses several limitations of conventional superconducting electronics, which require operation at cryogenic temperatures and often rely on fixed chemical doping or static strain to tune T c and coherence properties. In contrast, photoinduced superconducting properties that can be transiently accessed simply by shining light pulses—via reversible switching and without requiring modifications of the material—are highly desirable.
Superconducting interconnects—i.e., circuit elements that exhibit effectively zero electrical dissipation while in an active state—have already been proposed as integral components in superconducting qubits architectures [125]. In a photoinduced context, ultrafast light pulses may transiently turn a region of material into a superconducting (zero-resistance) state, allowing to route a signal with negligible losses between nodes in a circuit only during illumination.
Another recent work [115] proposed a light-controlled superconducting transistor where light intensity and phase directly modulate supercurrent magnitude and phase in a quantum dot Josephson junction, laying the groundwork for superconducting logic elements (diodes, transistors, etc.) [126,127].
Recent experiments on thin films of K 3 C 60 exposed to mid-infrared pulses and integrated on a chip with picosecond electrical pulses [24]—which revealed a transient nonlinear current–voltage behavior characteristic of a critical current—may pave the way for ultrafast on-chip electrical switching devices [128].
Other applications include the results by Kazim et al. [117], who showed that Nb superconducting nanofilms switch to a high-resistivity state under optical illumination. In [116], Peña et al. demonstrated that visible light shone across a superconductor-insulator interface can dramatically increase T c and alter conductivity, providing a photoinduced superconductivity switching mechanism. In another experiment [114], UV light activated a molecular switch (spiropyran) to create an electric double layer; illumination converted a Mott-insulating organic crystal into a superconducting state at low temperature, reversibly controlled by light, functioning as a light-gated superconducting transistor.
Beyond interconnects, photo-activated superconductive devices could find other applications in ultrafast detectors (i.e., devices that switch to a superconducting state upon illumination, such as superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors [129]).
In summary, engineering superconductivity via light pulses may unlock a new paradigm for quantum electronic devices: ultrafast, low-loss electronic elements that function dynamically at temperatures above the conventional superconducting temperature T c , circumventing the need for doping or continuous refrigeration, and paving the way toward novel superconducting electronics architectures.

3.2. Metastable Ferroelectricity and Multiferroic Ordering

The ultrafast control of ferroelectric phenomena has recently gained much interest because of their potential application to next-generation memory devices.
For example, Mankowsky et al. [26] demonstrated irreversible ultrafast reversal of the ferroelectric polarization in LiNbO 3 . The resonant excitation of an auxiliary phonon mode, switched the polarization transiently within ∼100 fs, as sensed via time-resolved SHG. Polarization reversal via pump pulse was also observed in Si-doped lead germanate [38]. These results were explained by Chen et al. [33], who showed how sequences of THz pulses along specific crystallographic directions can fully and deterministically reverse polarization in prototypical perovskite ferroelectrics, thus offering a clear pathway toward controlled ultrafast switching suitable for memory devices.
Polarization switching was also reported in CuInP 2 S 6 [36] and in ferroelectric field effect transistors (FeFET) based on bilayer hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) [35]. Bilayer hBN is a sliding ferroelectric, and exhibits a polarization switching over nanosecond timescales, with endurance over 10 11 cycles.
Several experiments on SrTiO 3 [27,28], a quantum paraelectric at ambient conditions, demonstrated that intense mid-IR pulses induce a ferroelectric phase persisting for hours after the pump, as showed via time-resolved SHG. The mechanism is attributed to nonlinear phononics [119], where driving of a polar mode modifies the double-well potential to stabilize a ferroelectric minimum (see Figure 3a).
Light-induced ferroelectricity was also demonstrated in antiferromagnetic Cr 2 O 3 [32]: a linearly polarized ultrafast light pulse transmitted through Cr 2 O 3 (an antiferromagnet) induces a spontaneous electric polarization without moving lattice or spins. This enables control of the magnitude and direction of the polarization on ultrafast timescales. Cr 2 O 3 is particularly interesting as it exhibits antiferromagnetic and ferroelectric orders, paving the way for ultrafast multiferroicity.
Ultrafast polarization reversal and deterministic THz switching enable ferroelectric memories–ferroelectric random access memory (FeRAM) [130,131] and FeFET [132,133,134]—with faster write-times (sub-ps to few-ps), demonstrating great potential for energy-efficient non-volatile memory in ferroelectrics. The bilayer hBN sliding-ferroelectric FeFET platform, combines low dimensionality, endurance, and fast switching, bringing atomically thin ferroelectric memories within reach, with great potential for integration with graphene channels.
The light-induced electronic dipole in antiferromagnetic Cr 2 O 3 offers a potentially multiferroic operation mode: since only electronic ordering is affected, repeated switching at THz rates may be possible, with the advantage of reduced fatigue and reversible logic states relying purely on electronic symmetry rather than lattice displacement.

3.3. Photoinduced Insulator-to-Metal Transition

Vanadium dioxide (VO2) is a prototypical strongly correlated oxide that undergoes a first-order insulator-to-metal transition near 340 K, accompanied by a structural distortion. The possibility of inducing this transition through ultrafast optical excitation, electric fields, or direct current injection has sparked intense research interest due to both potential applications in electronics [48].
A landmark study by Morrison et al. [47] used UED and mid-infrared TOS measurements to show that photoexcitation drives VO2 into a metastable metal-like state without changing the lattice structure. As showed via trARPES, the metal state appears within ∼100 fs from the pulse [100], proving the decoupling of electronic and structural transitions, implying that a purely electronic route to metallicity is possible. This metastable state exhibits different properties from the equilibrium metal, highlighting a non-thermal pathway to phase control.
Nano imaging via trSNOM [51,52] and UED [49] revealed that strain also plays a role in the photoinduced switching of VO 2 nanobeams.
These results demonstrate that VO 2 has great potential for several electronic applications. VO 2 -based planar memristors [135] exploit nanoscale VO 2 domains and focused electric fields to switch phase in ∼15 ps using femtojoule-scale voltage pulses, making them promising for ultrafast, energy efficient neuromorphic or memory circuits [136,137,138,139]. The application of VO 2 to memory devices has also been studied in nanowires [140] and thin films [141,142] of VO 2 .
All these results, together with recent progress in device integration, especially in ultrafast memristive switching and hybrid photonic–electronic layouts, position VO 2 as a promising material for ultrafast and low-energy applications to logic, memory, and signal processing.

3.4. More Light-Induced Phases

Many other experiments have demonstrated the photoinduced suppression or enhancement of different phases, including charge density wave order (CDW), spin waves, topological states and excitonic phases.
Charge density wave order—Several studies in transition-metal tellurides have demonstrated the ultrafast control of charge density wave and topological order. In LaTe 3 , Kogar et al. [42] used UED to observe a transient increase in the CDW order parameter, showing that low-fluence optical excitation enhances CDW amplitude instead of melting it. Follow-up work on LaTe 3 [40] used TOS, UED and trARPES to reveal the nucleation and growth of a photoinduced CDW phase, forming domains via topological defects within ∼1 ps. In VTe 2 , which hosts CDW order intertwined with nontrivial band topology, Suzuki et al. [143] employed trXRD to track the ultrafast lattice transformation from a topological CDW phase to a non-topological phase. In CeTe 3 , Zhou et al. [144] were able to access a hidden CDW order via photoexcitation, as revealed by UED.
Spin waves—Advances were also recently made in the control of non-equilibrium spin waves in quantum magnets. It was demonstrated that photoexcitation pulses can reverse the magnetization [145], and that magnonic transport in insulators such as yttrium-iron-garnet (YIG) can be enhanced via static external fields [146,147]. Moreover, control of spin waves led to the creation of tunable nano-oscillators [148,149]. These spin-based phenomena do not exhibit Joule heating or thermal losses, establishing magnons as versatile carriers for low-power interconnects and electronic devices.
Topological and excitonic phases—Tuning of topological states via photoexcitation was studied in CDW systems, including 1T-TaS 2 [150]—where UED revealed reversible switching of topological order—and 1T-TiSe 2 [44,45]—where topological states were induced starting from a CDW phase. More experiments reported ultrafast light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene [108,151] and photoinduced chirality [39] and excitonic condensation [46].
Applications—The application of these non-equilibrium states to electronic devices is not as immediate as in the case of superconductivity and ferroelectricity. Nonetheless, the switching of charge density wave order shows potential for photo-switched electronic architectures as it is usually associated with metal–insulator transitions and anisotropic transport in the ordered phase. Photoinduced topological phases may also find application in ultrafast transistors and spintronic devices. Spin waves in quantum magnets can also find application in spintronic devices [152], enabling low-power logic gates [153,154], signal processing devices [148,149] and dissipationless magnonic transport [147].

4. Current-Driven Phases

Electric currents and voltages constitute another type of non-equilibrium drive. Rather than being excited into a transient state, the system is driven into a non-equilibrium steady state (NESS), which may be a different phase from the equilibrium phase.
Experiments on several materials have demonstrated the possibility of resistive switching, i.e., driving the system from an insulating to a metallic state and vice versa, via an applied current or voltage. In this section, we briefly review the experimental results on the two most promising materials—namely Ca 2 RuO 4 and VO 2 —and their applications to electronics.

4.1. Current-Driven Insulator-to-Metal Transition in Ca 2 RuO 4

Calcium Ruthenate Ca 2 RuO 4 is a layered 4d transition-metal oxide, see Figure 5a, that exhibits a Mott insulating state [155] at low temperature, stabilized by cooperative lattice distortions and orbital ordering. Recent experiments have demonstrated that a direct current can drive a sharp insulator-to-metal transition (IMT), accompanied by dramatic changes in resistivity, structural symmetry, and even magnetic ordering, so that Ca 2 RuO 4 has emerged as a key platform for studying non-equilibrium phase transitions.
Evidence of a current-driven IMT in Ca2RuO4 was firstly reported by Nakamura et al. [54], who observed that applying DC current induces a reversible first-order transition from the insulating to a metallic state. The transition is accompanied by a structural transition, see Figure 5b, as later revealed by neutron scattering, XRD and RIXS [58,59,60,157], and is asymmetric, with the metallic phase always nucleating out of the negative electrode [105], see Figure 5e. The transition is observed even at temperatures well below the thermal IMT temperature, see Figure 5c,d, and at relatively low current densities (∼ 1 A/cm 2 ), suggesting a minor role of Joule heating.
The current induced transition was also studied in Ca 2 RuO 4 thin films [61,62,158], and in bulk samples via ARPES and transport measurements [57,58], which found band dispersion changes and an anisotropic suppression of the insulating gap, and via neutron diffraction [60], which revealed that the current also induces a new orbital-ordered state in Mn-doped Ca2RuO4, characterized by suppressed anti-ferromagnetism. These observations suggest that the non-equilibrium metallic state is electronically distinct from the high-temperature equilibrium metal and arises from a complex interplay between electronic and lattice degrees of freedom.
On the other hand, thermal imaging by Mattoni et al. [159] showed that the IMT occurs at the same local temperature as the equilibrium transition, but this local heating is spatially confined and correlated with phase coexistence between metallic and insulating domains.
All these results have stimulated theoretical interest, on the origin of the current-driven transition. While DMFT simulations [160] suggest a purely electronic mechanism [58,161], other works [162,163] argue that Joule heating and heating due to Seebeck effects at the metal–insulator interface play an important role.

4.2. Current- and Voltage-Driven Switching in VO2

Parallel to the photoinduced switching discussed in Section 3.3, current- and voltage-driven transitions have been widely demonstrated in nanoscale VO2 devices [66,67,69,70,71,76,78,164,165,166,167].
Sufficiently strong electric fields (∼ 10 7 V/m) can induce the collapse of the insulating phase and trigger metallic conduction even at room temperature. The transition is ultrafast [78], reversible, and characterized by random telegraph noise [67]. Zhou et al. [78] realized vertical metal–insulator–metal (MIM) structures exhibiting reversible switching on nanosecond timescales, while Ha et al. [69] reported high-frequency modulation of VO2-based devices under RF driving fields. Crunteanu et al. [76] demonstrated robust electrical cycling over 10 8 switching events, reinforcing the potential of VO2 for applications in electronics.
While Joule heating contributes to the transition in many device configurations, several experiments and modeling studies point to a non-thermal origin. Shi et al. [66] developed a phase-field model incorporating electron correlation and local heating, showing that current can induce IMT by weakening electronic correlations without a global increase in temperature. An isostructural electronic IMT, consistent with the formation of an electronically driven metallic state, was observed in epitaxial films [71,165].
Experimental studies in electronic device architectures confirm practical relevance: low-threshold voltage switching with high ON/OFF contrast has been achieved in planar memristor and vertical MIM geometries, operating at room temperature with nanosecond switching speed and high endurance [66,164]. Other works using VO 2 films confirm field-induced IMT reproducibly, with reversible switching over many cycles, demonstrating device stability and scalability [76,167].

4.3. Applications in Electronics and Resistive Switching

The findings reviewed in Section 4.1 and Section 4.2 collectively suggest that current-driven IMTs in correlated oxides have great technological potential for next-generation electronics. In particular, the ability to reversibly and reliably toggle the system between insulating and metallic states using modest electrical currents opens exciting avenues for resistive switching applications. Other applications in electronics leverage field-driven transitions for low-energy processing of logic and memory signals.
Unlike traditional Mott insulators, where transitions require high fields or structural doping, Ca 2 RuO 4 only require modest current densities or electric fields, demonstrating a low-power and directionally controllable switching behavior. These properties are highly desirable for developing Mott-based transistors [155] and neuromorphic computing elements [168,169]. Moreover, the sensitivity of the transition to lattice and orbital degrees of freedom implies that multi-functional responses—such as coupling to strain—could be integrated into complex device architectures, making Ca 2 RuO 4 a candidate for memristive switching.
The experimental results reviewed in Section 4.2 show the potential of VO2 as a versatile platform for ultrafast, non-volatile switching electronics. Crunteneau et al. [76] demonstrated its ability to rapidly, consistently and reliably switch between insulating and metallic phases, with an operational lifetime of up to 10 8 cycles. Devices based on VO 2 devices could serve as two-state switches with minimal input energy (fJ) and fast operational times (ns), low-power Mott field-effect transistors, or active elements in THz modulators. Indeed, demonstrative experiments have already showed that such VO 2 elements can be used to enable neuromorphic computing [136,138,139] and frequency-selective responses [137]. These combined advances position field-driven VO 2 as a promising platform for beyond-CMOS computing architectures, and energy-efficient, ultra-fast switches [135] in future electronics.

5. Discussion

The experimental advances reviewed in the previous sections highlight the growing potential of non-equilibrium control in quantum materials as a foundational principle for future electronics.
Researchers have driven materials with ultrafast pulses of light or electrical current, managing to access an expanding landscape of transient and metastable phases—including superconductivity, ferroelectricity, charge density waves, and topological states—many of which are hidden in equilibrium and unreachable through conventional tuning parameters such as pressure or chemical doping.
One of the most promising features of these systems is that fundamental material properties—such as conductivity, polarization, and coherence—can be reversibly and dynamically tuned on ultrafast timescales. This opens the door to new classes of devices that operate through time-dependent functional states that can be changed within nanoseconds without the need to restructure the entire material architecture. In this framework, light or current are active control knobs—enabling electronic devices that are triggered by pulses, or programmed in time.
The implications for low-power, high-speed electronics are profound, as non-equilibrium phases are typically accessed within very short timescales (femtoseconds to picoseconds), with light pulses that require minimal energy, down to microJoules or even nanoJoules.
Light-induced superconductivity, for example, could provide ultrafast, dissipationless interconnects that operate above the equilibrium critical temperature, eliminating the need for continuous refrigeration. Ultrafast ferroelectric switching offers a new route to non-volatile memory elements with picosecond write speeds and minimal energy consumption. Current-induced metal–insulator transitions in correlated oxides point toward neuromorphic components and Mott transistors, operating beyond the limits of current technology.
In Table 1, we summarize the non-equilibrium phases that have the greatest potential for electronic applications. We include the most promising candidate materials, their potential for technological applications, along with the relevant literature references.
Beyond technological relevance, these non-equilibrium states are interesting for fundamental physics. They reveal how electron correlations, lattice dynamics, and topology conspire to form emergent orders—and how these orders can be manipulated, enhanced, or suppressed under dynamic conditions.
Looking forward, a key frontier will be the stabilization and control of these driven phases for extended durations and in scalable architectures. Integrating ultrafast drive mechanisms with existing electronic architectures will be essential. The convergence of non-equilibrium materials science, and electronics has the potential to spawn a new class of hybrid devices based on dynamical control of electronic properties.

Challenges

Although non-equilibrium phases in quantum materials exhibit rich phenomenology with great technological potential, several critical challenges still need to be overcome before these phenomena can be translated into scalable and robust technologies.
Theoretical interpretation—A central open question in the study of photoactive superconductivity concerns the true nature of the transient state observed in photoexcited cuprates and fullerides, as it is still unclear whether the light-induced state corresponds to genuine superconductivity, characterized by macroscopic phase coherence and Meissner effect, or rather to a high-mobility metallic state with superconducting-like optical features. Although the experimental signatures in K 3 C 60 [19,20,21,22,23,24] and YBCO [7,14,15,16,17,18] have demonstrated transient responses that resemble those of a superconducting state, the lack of direct evidence for zero resistance or magnetic flux expulsion, as well as the mismatch in penetration depth between pump and probe pulses, leaves room for alternative interpretations.
Several mechanisms have been proposed, one of them invoking nonlinear phononics, where the driven phonon mode modifies the lattice potential landscape to stabilize a superconducting ground state [21,109,110]. Other theories propose radiation-induced quasiparticle cooling [120] or enhancement of superconducting fluctuations without full coherence [23]. On the other hand, critical analyses have argued that the observed conductivity spectra could also be fitted by non-superconducting models of transient metallic states with negative conductivity [121,122] or with non-linear effects in pump fluence [123]. Thus, further experimental efforts are required to conclusively establish whether these states are superconducting in the strict thermodynamic sense. Understanding this distinction bears direct implications for the design of superconducting electronics based on optical control.
A similar issue arises with the nature of the current-driven IMT in Ca 2 RuO 4 , for which a comprehensive explanation has still not been found. While some theoretical interpretations favor an electronic origin [58,161], other results point to some sort of heating mechanism [159,163]. A predominant role of thermal heating in the switching mechanism would limit applicability to resistive switching devices.
Reproducibility—A major obstacle, common to most results presented in this manuscript, is reproducibility across samples and platforms. Many of the reported photoinduced or current-driven effects are highly sensitive to sample quality, and device geometry, so that small variations in crystalline order, or contact resistance can lead to different outcomes. Standardizing the protocols for material preparation will be essential to move beyond proof-of-concept demonstrations.
Scaling and compatibilit—For practical use in new electronic devices, non-equilibrium quantum materials must be scaled up in size and need to be compatible with device architectures that support high-density packing, and low-power operation. This imposes stringent constraints on materials, thermal losses, and drive mechanisms.
Thermal losses—Thermal management is a critical challenge. Many of the transitions discussed — especially current-driven ones—involve localized heating [163,171] that may result in energy losses and hinder long-term device stability. Although some experiments have convincingly demonstrated non-thermal pathways (e.g., ultrafast transitions in VO 2 or ferroelectric materials), distinguishing true electronic switching from thermally assisted mechanisms remains a challenge. In this sense, the investigation of hot-electrons dynamics [85,86] can help determining whether the non-equilibrium state arises simply from thermal heating or from true electronic mechanisms. Furthermore, repeated pulsed operation may lead to fatigue or excessive heating of the device.
Lifetime—Finally, the lifetime and coherence of the driven phases must be extended or stabilized for real-world operation. While ultrafast dynamics is beneficial for speed, many non-equilibrium states remain limited to picosecond–nanosecond timescales or require sustained external driving. Engineering ways to trap or sustain these states is an active area of research that could unlock persistent device functionality.

6. Outlook

In summary, the results presented in this review point to a paradigm shift in our approach to materials functionality. By embracing non-equilibrium control as a design principle, we gain access to a vastly richer set of electronic behaviors and device concepts.
Vanadium dioxide is the material with the highest level of technology readiness for novel electronic devices. It promises a large number of possible applications, which have been demonstrated in a laboratory setting, and some of them have even been tested for reproducibility and endurance. Ultrafast ferroelectricity is based on a large class of ferroelectric materials, and provides a versatile and promising platform for ultrafast memory applications, which have recently been demonstrated. Light-induced superconductivity in cuprates and fullerides has groundbreaking potential for electronics, but researchers in this field still need to reach a complete theoretical understanding and achieve reproducibility of the experimental results.
In summary, the path to the implementation of non-equilibrium phases on functional devices still requires coordinated advances in material growth, ultrafast driving techniques, device engineering, and theoretical understanding. Overcoming these challenges will be central to realizing the full potential of non-equilibrium quantum materials in next-generation electronics.

Funding

This research was funded by ICSC–Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in High-Performance Computing, Big Data and Quantum Computing under project E63C22001000006.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

G.C. acknowledges the CINECA award under the ISCRA initiative, for the availability of high-performance computing resources and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CDWCharge density wave
DMFTDynamical mean field theory
FEFerroelectricity
IMTInsulator-to-metal transition
IRInfrared
SCSuperconductivity
SHGSecond harmonic generation
TOSTime-resolved optical spectroscopy
(tr)ARPES(Time-resolved and) angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
(tr)RIXS(Time-resolved) resonant inelastic X-ray scattering
trSNOMTime-resolved scanning near-field optical microscopy
(tr)XRD(Time-resolved) X-ray diffraction
UEDUltrafast electron diffraction

References

  1. Basov, D.N.; Averitt, R.D.; Hsieh, D. Towards Properties on Demand in Quantum Materials. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 1077–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. de la Torre, A.; Kennes, D.M.; Claassen, M.; Gerber, S.; McIver, J.W.; Sentef, M.A. Colloquium: Nonthermal Pathways to Ultrafast Control in Quantum Materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2021, 93, 041002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fausti, D.; Tobey, R.I.; Dean, N.; Kaiser, S.; Dienst, A.; Hoffmann, M.C.; Pyon, S.; Takayama, T.; Takagi, H.; Cavalleri, A. Light-Induced Superconductivity in a Stripe-Ordered Cuprate. Science 2011, 331, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nicoletti, D.; Casandruc, E.; Laplace, Y.; Khanna, V.; Hunt, C.R.; Kaiser, S.; Dhesi, S.S.; Gu, G.D.; Hill, J.P.; Cavalleri, A. Optically Induced Superconductivity in Striped La2-xBaxCuO4 by Polarization-Selective Excitation in the near Infrared. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 100503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nicoletti, D.; Fu, D.; Mehio, O.; Moore, S.; Disa, A.S.; Gu, G.D.; Cavalleri, A. Magnetic-Field Tuning of Light-Induced Superconductivity in Striped La2−xBaxCuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 267003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Först, M.; Tobey, R.I.; Bromberger, H.; Wilkins, S.B.; Khanna, V.; Caviglia, A.D.; Chuang, Y.D.; Lee, W.S.; Schlotter, W.F.; Turner, J.J.; et al. Melting of Charge Stripes in Vibrationally Driven La1.875Ba0.125CuO4: Assessing the Respective Roles of Electronic and Lattice Order in Frustrated Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 157002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaiser, S.; Hunt, C.R.; Nicoletti, D.; Hu, W.; Gierz, I.; Liu, H.Y.; Le Tacon, M.; Loew, T.; Haug, D.; Keimer, B.; et al. Optically Induced Coherent Transport Far above Tc in Underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+δ. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 184516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Casandruc, E.; Nicoletti, D.; Rajasekaran, S.; Laplace, Y.; Khanna, V.; Gu, G.D.; Hill, J.P.; Cavalleri, A. Wavelength-Dependent Optical Enhancement of Superconducting Interlayer Coupling in La1.885Ba0.115CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 174502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khanna, V.; Mankowsky, R.; Petrich, M.; Bromberger, H.; Cavill, S.A.; Möhr-Vorobeva, E.; Nicoletti, D.; Laplace, Y.; Gu, G.D.; Hill, J.P.; et al. Restoring Interlayer Josephson Coupling in La1.885Ba0.115CuO4 by Charge Transfer Melting of Stripe Order. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 224522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hunt, C.R.; Nicoletti, D.; Kaiser, S.; Pröpper, D.; Loew, T.; Porras, J.; Keimer, B.; Cavalleri, A. Dynamical Decoherence of the Light Induced Interlayer Coupling in YBa2Cu3O6+δ. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 224303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, S.J.; Wang, Z.X.; Wu, D.; Liu, Q.M.; Shi, L.Y.; Lin, T.; Li, S.L.; Dai, P.C.; Dong, T.; Wang, N.L. Photoinduced Metastable State with Modulated Josephson Coupling Strengths in Pr0.88LaCe0.12CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 224507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Niwa, H.; Yoshikawa, N.; Tomari, K.; Matsunaga, R.; Song, D.; Eisaki, H.; Shimano, R. Light-Induced Nonequilibrium Response of the Superconducting Cuprate La2-xSrxCuO4. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 104507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cremin, K.A.; Zhang, J.; Homes, C.C.; Gu, G.D.; Sun, Z.; Fogler, M.M.; Millis, A.J.; Basov, D.N.; Averitt, R.D. Photoenhanced Metastable C-Axis Electrodynamics in Stripe-Ordered Cuprate La1.885Ba0.115CuO4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 19875–19879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, S.J.; Wang, Z.X.; Xiang, H.; Yao, X.; Liu, Q.M.; Shi, L.Y.; Lin, T.; Dong, T.; Wu, D.; Wang, N.L. Photoinduced Nonequilibrium Response in Underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+x Probed by Time-Resolved Terahertz Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 011056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, B.; Först, M.; Fechner, M.; Nicoletti, D.; Porras, J.; Loew, T.; Keimer, B.; Cavalleri, A. Pump Frequency Resonances for Light-Induced Incipient Superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.5. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 011053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marciniak, A.; Marcantoni, S.; Giusti, F.; Glerean, F.; Sparapassi, G.; Nova, T.; Cartella, A.; Latini, S.; Valiera, F.; Rubio, A.; et al. Vibrational Coherent Control of Localized d–d Electronic Excitation. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Katsumi, K.; Nishida, M.; Kaiser, S.; Miyasaka, S.; Tajima, S.; Shimano, R. Near-Infrared Light-Induced Superconducting-like State in Underdoped YBa2Cu3Oy Studied by c-Axis Terahertz Third-Harmonic Generation. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 214506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fava, S.; De Vecchi, G.; Jotzu, G.; Buzzi, M.; Gebert, T.; Liu, Y.; Keimer, B.; Cavalleri, A. Magnetic Field Expulsion in Optically Driven YBa2Cu3O6.48. Nature 2024, 632, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mitrano, M.; Cantaluppi, A.; Nicoletti, D.; Kaiser, S.; Perucchi, A.; Lupi, S.; Di Pietro, P.; Pontiroli, D.; Riccò, M.; Clark, S.R.; et al. Possible Light-Induced Superconductivity in K3C60 at High Temperature. Nature 2016, 530, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cantaluppi, A.; Buzzi, M.; Jotzu, G.; Nicoletti, D.; Mitrano, M.; Pontiroli, D.; Riccò, M.; Perucchi, A.; Di Pietro, P.; Cavalleri, A. Pressure Tuning of Light-Induced Superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Budden, M.; Gebert, T.; Buzzi, M.; Jotzu, G.; Wang, E.; Matsuyama, T.; Meier, G.; Laplace, Y.; Pontiroli, D.; Riccò, M.; et al. Evidence for Metastable Photo-Induced Superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Buzzi, M.; Nicoletti, D.; Fechner, M.; Tancogne-Dejean, N.; Sentef, M.A.; Georges, A.; Biesner, T.; Uykur, E.; Dressel, M.; Henderson, A.; et al. Photomolecular High-Temperature Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 031028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jotzu, G.; Meier, G.; Cantaluppi, A.; Cavalleri, A.; Pontiroli, D.; Riccò, M.; Ardavan, A.; Nam, M.S. Superconducting Fluctuations Observed Far above Tc in the Isotropic Superconductor K3C60. Phys. Rev. X 2023, 13, 021008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, E.; Adelinia, J.D.; Chavez-Cervantes, M.; Matsuyama, T.; Fechner, M.; Buzzi, M.; Meier, G.; Cavalleri, A. Superconducting Nonlinear Transport in Optically Driven High-Temperature K3C60. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nova, T.F.; Cartella, A.; Cantaluppi, A.; Först, M.; Bossini, D.; Mikhaylovskiy, R.V.; Kimel, A.V.; Merlin, R.; Cavalleri, A. An Effective Magnetic Field from Optically Driven Phonons. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mankowsky, R.; von Hoegen, A.; Först, M.; Cavalleri, A. Ultrafast Reversal of the Ferroelectric Polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 197601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nova, T.F.; Disa, A.S.; Fechner, M.; Cavalleri, A. Metastable Ferroelectricity in Optically Strained SrTiO3. Science 2019, 364, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, X.; Qiu, T.; Zhang, J.; Baldini, E.; Lu, J.; Rappe, A.M.; Nelson, K.A. Terahertz Field–Induced Ferroelectricity in Quantum Paraelectric SrTiO3. Science 2019, 364, 1079–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Disa, A.S.; Fechner, M.; Nova, T.F.; Liu, B.; Först, M.; Prabhakaran, D.; Radaelli, P.G.; Cavalleri, A. Polarizing an Antiferromagnet by Optical Engineering of the Crystal Field. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shin, D.; Latini, S.; Schäfer, C.; Sato, S.A.; Baldini, E.; De Giovannini, U.; Hübener, H.; Rubio, A. Simulating Terahertz Field-Induced Ferroelectricity in Quantum Paraelectric SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 167401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Disa, A.S.; Curtis, J.; Fechner, M.; Liu, A.; von Hoegen, A.; Först, M.; Nova, T.F.; Narang, P.; Maljuk, A.; Boris, A.V.; et al. Photo-Induced High-Temperature Ferromagnetism in YTiO3. Nature 2023, 617, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, X.; Carbin, T.; Culver, A.B.; Du, K.; Wang, K.; Cheong, S.W.; Roy, R.; Kogar, A. Light-Induced Electronic Polarization in Antiferromagnetic Cr2O3. Nat. Mater. 2024, 23, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, P.; Paillard, C.; Zhao, H.J.; Íñiguez, J.; Bellaiche, L. Deterministic Control of Ferroelectric Polarization by Ultrafast Laser Pulses. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Först, M.; Caviglia, A.D.; Scherwitzl, R.; Mankowsky, R.; Zubko, P.; Khanna, V.; Bromberger, H.; Wilkins, S.B.; Chuang, Y.D.; Lee, W.S.; et al. Spatially Resolved Ultrafast Magnetic Dynamics Initiated at a Complex Oxide Heterointerface. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yasuda, K.; Zalys-Geller, E.; Wang, X.; Bennett, D.; Cheema, S.S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kaxiras, E.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Ashoori, R. Ultrafast High-Endurance Memory Based on Sliding Ferroelectrics. Science 2024, 385, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J.; Yang, K.; Yu, J.; Fu, H.; Ding, Z.; Shi, X.; Meng, S. Ultrafast Polarization Switching via Laser-activated Ionic Migration in Ferroelectric CuInP2S6. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.09958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lian, C.; Ali, Z.A.; Kwon, H.; Wong, B.M. Indirect but Efficient: Laser-Excited Electrons Can Drive Ultrafast Polarization Switching in Ferroelectric Materials. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3402–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bilyk, V.; Mishina, E.; Sherstyuk, N.; Bush, A.; Ovchinnikov, A.; Agranat, M. Transient Polarization Reversal Using an Intense THz Pulse in Silicon-Doped Lead Germanate. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett. 2021, 15, 2000460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeng, Z.; Först, M.; Fechner, M.; Buzzi, M.; Amuah, E.B.; Putzke, C.; Moll, P.J.W.; Prabhakaran, D.; Radaelli, P.G.; Cavalleri, A. Photo-Induced Chirality in a Nonchiral Crystal. Science 2025, 387, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zong, A.; Kogar, A.; Bie, Y.Q.; Rohwer, T.; Lee, C.; Baldini, E.; Ergeçen, E.; Yilmaz, M.B.; Freelon, B.; Sie, E.J.; et al. Evidence for Topological Defects in a Photoinduced Phase Transition. Nat. Phys. 2019, 15, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zong, A.; Dolgirev, P.E.; Kogar, A.; Ergeçen, E.; Yilmaz, M.B.; Bie, Y.Q.; Rohwer, T.; Tung, I.C.; Straquadine, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Dynamical Slowing-Down in an Ultrafast Photoinduced Phase Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 097601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kogar, A.; Zong, A.; Dolgirev, P.E.; Shen, X.; Straquadine, J.; Bie, Y.Q.; Wang, X.; Rohwer, T.; Tung, I.C.; Yang, Y.; et al. Light-Induced Charge Density Wave in LaTe3. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wandel, S.; Boschini, F.; da Silva Neto, E.H.; Shen, L.; Na, M.X.; Zohar, S.; Wang, Y.; Welch, S.B.; Seaberg, M.H.; Koralek, J.D.; et al. Enhanced Charge Density Wave Coherence in a Light-Quenched, High-Temperature Superconductor. Science 2022, 376, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cheng, Y.; Zong, A.; Li, J.; Xia, W.; Duan, S.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Qi, F.; Wu, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Light-Induced Dimension Crossover Dictated by Excitonic Correlations. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cheng, Y.; Zong, A.; Wu, L.; Meng, Q.; Xia, W.; Qi, F.; Zhu, P.; Zou, X.; Jiang, T.; Guo, Y.; et al. Ultrafast Formation of Topological Defects in a Two-Dimensional Charge Density Wave. Nat. Phys. 2024, 20, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mori, R.; Takasan, K.; Ai, P.; Ciocys, S.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kondo, T.; Morimoto, T.; Lanzara, A. Possible Evidence of Excitonic Condensation in a Topological Insulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2422667122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Morrison, V.R.; Chatelain, R.P.; Tiwari, K.L.; Hendaoui, A.; Bruhács, A.; Chaker, M.; Siwick, B.J. A Photoinduced Metal-like Phase of Monoclinic VO2 Revealed by Ultrafast Electron Diffraction. Science 2014, 346, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Liu, A.; Chai, X.; Yang, Y.; Lu, M.; Bai, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y. An Interesting Functional Phase Change Material VO2: Response to Multivariate Control and Extensive Applications in Optics and Electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2024, 10, 2300699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tao, Z.; Zhou, F.; Han, T.R.T.; Torres, D.; Wang, T.; Sepulveda, N.; Chang, K.; Young, M.; Lunt, R.R.; Ruan, C.Y. The Nature of Photoinduced Phase Transition and Metastable States in Vanadium Dioxide. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, C.; Jin, C.; Chen, Z.; Lu, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, B.; Qi, F.; Chen, J.; Yin, X.; Wang, G.; et al. Transient Dynamics of the Phase Transition in VO2 Revealed by Mega-Electron-Volt Ultrafast Electron Diffraction. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huber, M.A.; Plankl, M.; Eisele, M.; Marvel, R.E.; Sandner, F.; Korn, T.; Schüller, C.; Haglund, R.F., Jr.; Huber, R.; Cocker, T.L. Ultrafast Mid-Infrared Nanoscopy of Strained Vanadium Dioxide Nanobeams. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1421–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dönges, S.A.; Khatib, O.; O’Callahan, B.T.; Atkin, J.M.; Park, J.H.; Cobden, D.; Raschke, M.B. Ultrafast Nanoimaging of the Photoinduced Phase Transition Dynamics in VO2. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3029–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sood, A.; Shen, X.; Shi, Y.; Kumar, S.; Park, S.J.; Zajac, M.; Sun, Y.; Chen, L.Q.; Ramanathan, S.; Wang, X.; et al. Universal Phase Dynamics in VO2 Switches Revealed by Ultrafast Operando Diffraction. Science 2021, 373, 352–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nakamura, F.; Sakaki, M.; Yamanaka, Y.; Tamaru, S.; Suzuki, T.; Maeno, Y. Electric-Field-Induced Metal Maintained by Current of the Mott Insulator Ca2RuO4. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guiot, V.; Cario, L.; Janod, E.; Corraze, B.; Ta Phuoc, V.; Rozenberg, M.; Stoliar, P.; Cren, T.; Roditchev, D. Avalanche Breakdown in GaTa4Se8-xTex Narrow-Gap Mott Insulators. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Okazaki, R.; Nishina, Y.; Yasui, Y.; Nakamura, F.; Suzuki, T.; Terasaki, I. Current-Induced Gap Suppression in the Mott Insulator Ca2RuO4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2013, 82, 103702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Curcio, D.; Sanders, C.E.; Chikina, A.; Lund, H.E.; Bianchi, M.; Granata, V.; Cannavacciuolo, M.; Cuono, G.; Autieri, C.; Forte, F.; et al. Current-Driven Insulator-to-Metal Transition without Mott Breakdown in Ca2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, L161105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Suen, C.T.; Marković, I.; Zonno, M.; Heinsdorf, N.; Zhdanovich, S.; Jo, N.H.; Schmid, M.; Hansmann, P.; Puphal, P.; Fürsich, K.; et al. Electronic Response of a Mott Insulator at a Current-Induced Insulator-to-Metal Transition. Nat. Phys. 2024, 20, 1757–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhartiya, V.K.; Hartmann, R.; Forte, F.; Gabriele, F.; Kim, T.; Cuono, G.; Autieri, C.; Fan, S.; Kisslinger, K.; Camino, F.; et al. Evidence of Electronic States Driving Current-Induced Insulator-to-Metal Transition. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.17871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, H.; Hu, B.; Ye, F.; Hoffmann, C.; Kimchi, I.; Cao, G. Nonequilibrium Orbital Transitions via Applied Electrical Current in Calcium Ruthenates. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 241104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fukuchi, A.; Katase, T.; Kamiya, T. Room-Temperature Possible Current-Induced Transition in Ca2RuO4 Thin Films Grown Through Intercalation-Like Cation Diffusion in the A2BO4 Ruddlesden–Popper Structure. Small Methods 2024, 8, 2400264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tsurumaki-Fukuchi, A.; Tsubaki, K.; Katase, T.; Kamiya, T.; Arita, M.; Takahashi, Y. Stable and Tunable Current-Induced Phase Transition in Epitaxial Thin Films of Ca2RuO4. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 28368–28374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Avallone, G.; Fermin, R.; Lahabi, K.; Granata, V.; Fittipaldi, R.; Cirillo, C.; Attanasio, C.; Vecchione, A.; Aarts, J. Universal Size-Dependent Nonlinear Charge Transport in Single Crystals of the Mott Insulator Ca2RuO4. npj Quantum Mater. 2021, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tsitsishvili, M.; Poletti, D.; Dalmonte, M.; Chiriacò, G. Measurement induced transitions in non-Markovian free fermion ladders. SciPost Phys. Core 2024, 7, 011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Muzzi, C.; Tsitsishvili, M.; Chiriacò, G. Entanglement enhancement induced by noise in inhomogeneously monitored systems. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 111, 014312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shi, Y.; Chen, L.Q. Current-Driven Insulator-To-Metal Transition in Strongly Correlated VO2. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 014059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, B.; Zimmers, A.; Aubin, H.; Ghosh, R.; Liu, Y.; Lopez, R. Electric-Field-Driven Phase Transition in Vanadium Dioxide. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 241410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Orlianges, J.C.; Allegret, O.; Sirjita, E.N.; Masson, A.; Boulle, A.; Théry, V.; Tardif, S.; Micha, J.S.; Crunteanu, A. Electrical Activation of Insulator-to-Metal Transition in Vanadium Dioxide Single-Crystal Nanobeam and Their High-Frequency Switching Performances. J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 136, 064502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ha, S.D.; Zhou, Y.; Fisher, C.J.; Ramanathan, S.; Treadway, J.P. Electrical Switching Dynamics and Broadband Microwave Characteristics of VO2 Radio Frequency Devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 184501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, S.; Wang, Z.; Ren, H.; Chen, Y.; Yan, W.; Wang, C.; Li, B.; Jiang, J.; Zou, C. Gate-Controlled VO2 Phase Transition for High-Performance Smart Windows. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lee, D.; Chung, B.; Shi, Y.; Kim, G.Y.; Campbell, N.; Xue, F.; Song, K.; Choi, S.Y.; Podkaminer, J.P.; Kim, T.H.; et al. Isostructural Metal-Insulator Transition in VO2. Science 2018, 362, 1037–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kim, C.Y.; Slusar, T.; Cho, J.; Kim, H.T. Mott Switching and Structural Transition in the Metal Phase of VO2 Nanodomain. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cheng, S.; Navarro, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Kaur, J.; Pofelski, A.; Meng, Q.; Zhou, C.; Chen, C.; Dean, M.P.M.; et al. Purely Electronic Insulator-Metal Transition in Rutile VO2. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shao, Z.; Cao, X.; Luo, H.; Jin, P. Recent Progress in the Phase-Transition Mechanism and Modulation of Vanadium Dioxide Materials. NPG Asia Materials 2018, 10, 581–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, D.; Lee, J.; Song, K.; Xue, F.; Choi, S.Y.; Ma, Y.; Podkaminer, J.; Liu, D.; Liu, S.C.; Chung, B.; et al. Sharpened VO2 Phase Transition via Controlled Release of Epitaxial Strain. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5614–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Crunteanu, A.; Givernaud, J.; Leroy, J.; Mardivirin, D.; Champeaux, C.; Orlianges, J.C.; Catherinot, A.; Blondy, P. Voltage- and Current-Activated Metal–Insulator Transition in VO2-based Electrical Switches: A Lifetime Operation Analysis. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2010, 11, 065002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ling, C.; Zhao, Z.; Hu, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, H. W Doping and Voltage Driven Metal–Insulator Transition in VO2 Nano-Films for Smart Switching Devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 6738–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Ko, C.; Yang, Z.; Mouli, C.; Ramanathan, S. Voltage-Triggered Ultrafast Phase Transition in Vanadium Dioxide Switches. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zong, A.; Nebgen, B.R.; Lin, S.C.; Spies, J.A.; Zuerch, M. Emerging Ultrafast Techniques for Studying Quantum Materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2023, 8, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mitrano, M.; Wang, Y. Probing Light-Driven Quantum Materials with Ultrafast Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering. Commun. Phys. 2020, 3, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Averitt, R.D.; Taylor, A.J. Ultrafast Optical and Far-Infrared Quasiparticle Dynamics in Correlated Electron Materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, R1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Orenstein, J. Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Quantum Materials. Phys. Today 2012, 65, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cheng, T.K.; Brorson, S.D.; Kazeroonian, A.S.; Moodera, J.S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Ippen, E.P. Impulsive Excitation of Coherent Phonons Observed in Reflection in Bismuth and Antimony. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 57, 1004–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Merlin, R. Generating Coherent THz Phonons with Light Pulses. Solid State Commun. 1997, 102, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Taghinejad, M.; Xu, Z.; Lee, K.T.; Lian, T.; Cai, W. Transient Second-Order Nonlinear Media: Breaking the Spatial Symmetry in the Time Domain via Hot-Electron Transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 013901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Taghinejad, M.; Xia, C.; Hrton, M.; Lee, K.T.; Kim, A.S.; Li, Q.; Guzelturk, B.; Kalousek, R.; Xu, F.; Cai, W.; et al. Determining Hot-Carrier Transport Dynamics from Terahertz Emission. Science 2023, 382, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sparapassi, G.; Cavaletto, S.M.; Tollerud, J.; Montanaro, A.; Glerean, F.; Marciniak, A.; Giusti, F.; Mukamel, S.; Fausti, D. Transient Measurement of Phononic States with Covariance-Based Stochastic Spectroscopy. Light. Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Glerean, F.; Rigoni, E.M.; Jarc, G.; Mathengattil, S.Y.; Montanaro, A.; Giusti, F.; Mitrano, M.; Benatti, F.; Fausti, D. Ultrafast Pump-Probe Phase-Randomized Tomography. Light. Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Buzzi, M.; Först, M.; Mankowsky, R.; Cavalleri, A. Probing Dynamics in Quantum Materials with Femtosecond X-rays. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cao, Y.; Mazzone, D.G.; Meyers, D.; Hill, J.P.; Liu, X.; Wall, S.; Dean, M.P.M. Ultrafast Dynamics of Spin and Orbital Correlations in Quantum Materials: An Energy- and Momentum-Resolved Perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 377, 20170480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Filippetto, D.; Musumeci, P.; Li, R.K.; Siwick, B.J.; Otto, M.R.; Centurion, M.; Nunes, J.P.F. Ultrafast Electron Diffraction: Visualizing Dynamic States of Matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2022, 94, 045004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yoshida, S.; Aizawa, Y.; Wang, Z.h.; Oshima, R.; Mera, Y.; Matsuyama, E.; Oigawa, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Shigekawa, H. Probing Ultrafast Spin Dynamics with Optical Pump–Probe Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jelic, V.; Iwaszczuk, K.; Nguyen, P.H.; Rathje, C.; Hornig, G.J.; Sharum, H.M.; Hoffman, J.R.; Freeman, M.R.; Hegmann, F.A. Ultrafast Terahertz Control of Extreme Tunnel Currents through Single Atoms on a Silicon Surface. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yoshida, S.; Arashida, Y.; Hirori, H.; Tachizaki, T.; Taninaka, A.; Ueno, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Shigekawa, H. Terahertz Scanning Tunneling Microscopy for Visualizing Ultrafast Electron Motion in Nanoscale Potential Variations. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Garg, M.; Martin-Jimenez, A.; Luo, Y.; Kern, K. Ultrafast Photon-Induced Tunneling Microscopy. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 18071–18084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Khusnatdinov, N.N.; Nagle, T.J.; Nunes, G., Jr. Ultrafast Scanning Tunneling Microscopy with 1 Nm Resolution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 4434–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. López, L.E.P.; Vaitsi, A.; Sleziona, V.; Schulz, F.; Wolf, M.; Müller, M. Atomic-Scale Ultrafast Dynamics of Local Charge Order in a THz-induced Metastable State of 1T-TaS2. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.20541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sobota, J.A.; He, Y.; Shen, Z.X. Angle-Resolved Photoemission Studies of Quantum Materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2021, 93, 025006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gerber, S.; Yang, S.L.; Zhu, D.; Soifer, H.; Sobota, J.A.; Rebec, S.; Lee, J.J.; Jia, T.; Moritz, B.; Jia, C.; et al. Femtosecond Electron-Phonon Lock-in by Photoemission and x-Ray Free-Electron Laser. Science 2017, 357, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Wegkamp, D.; Herzog, M.; Xian, L.; Gatti, M.; Cudazzo, P.; McGahan, C.L.; Marvel, R.E.; Haglund, R.F.; Rubio, A.; Wolf, M.; et al. Instantaneous Band Gap Collapse in Photoexcited Monoclinic VO2 Due to Photocarrier Doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 216401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Ulonska, S.; Robinson, J.S.; Ranitovic, P.; Kaindl, R.A. Bright High-Repetition-Rate Source of Narrowband Extreme-Ultraviolet Harmonics beyond 22 eV. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Schmitt, F.; Kirchmann, P.S.; Bovensiepen, U.; Moore, R.G.; Rettig, L.; Krenz, M.; Chu, J.H.; Ru, N.; Perfetti, L.; Lu, D.H.; et al. Transient Electronic Structure and Melting of a Charge Density Wave in TbTe3. Science 2008, 321, 1649–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Eisele, M.; Cocker, T.L.; Huber, M.A.; Plankl, M.; Viti, L.; Ercolani, D.; Sorba, L.; Vitiello, M.S.; Huber, R. Ultrafast Multi-Terahertz Nano-Spectroscopy with Sub-Cycle Temporal Resolution. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. McLeod, A.S.; Wieteska, A.; Chiriaco, G.; Foutty, B.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xue, F.; Gopalan, V.; Chen, L.Q.; Mao, Z.Q.; et al. Nano-Imaging of Strain-Tuned Stripe Textures in a Mott Crystal. npj Quantum Mater. 2021, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, J.; McLeod, A.S.; Han, Q.; Chen, X.; Bechtel, H.A.; Yao, Z.; Gilbert Corder, S.N.; Ciavatti, T.; Tao, T.H.; Aronson, M.; et al. Nano-Resolved Current-Induced Insulator-Metal Transition in the Mott Insulator Ca2RuO4. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 011032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ni, G.X.; Wang, L.; Goldflam, M.D.; Wagner, M.; Fei, Z.; McLeod, A.S.; Liu, M.K.; Keilmann, F.; Özyilmaz, B.; Castro Neto, A.H.; et al. Ultrafast Optical Switching of Infrared Plasmon Polaritons in High-Mobility Graphene. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Auston, D.H. Picosecond Optoelectronic Switching and Gating in Silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1975, 26, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. McIver, J.W.; Schulte, B.; Stein, F.U.; Matsuyama, T.; Jotzu, G.; Meier, G.; Cavalleri, A. Light-Induced Anomalous Hall Effect in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kennes, D.M.; Wilner, E.Y.; Reichman, D.R.; Millis, A.J. Transient Superconductivity from Electronic Squeezing of Optically Pumped Phonons. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Buzzi, M.; Jotzu, G.; Cavalleri, A.; Cirac, J.I.; Demler, E.A.; Halperin, B.I.; Lukin, M.D.; Shi, T.; Wang, Y.; Podolsky, D. Higgs-Mediated Optical Amplification in a Nonequilibrium Superconductor. Phys. Rev. X 2021, 11, 011055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Babadi, M.; Knap, M.; Martin, I.; Refael, G.; Demler, E. Theory of Parametrically Amplified Electron-Phonon Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 014512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Murakami, Y.; Golež, D.; Eckstein, M.; Werner, P. Photoinduced Enhancement of Excitonic Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 247601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sun, Z.; Millis, A.J. Transient Trapping into Metastable States in Systems with Competing Orders. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 021028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Suda, M.; Kato, R.; Yamamoto, H.M. Light-Induced Superconductivity Using a Photoactive Electric Double Layer. Science 2015, 347, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Qiao, G.J.; Zhang, Z.L.; Li, S.W.; Sun, C.P. Controlling Superconducting Transistor by Coherent Light. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.04442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Peña, V.; Gredig, T.; Santamaria, J.; Schuller, I.K. Interfacially Controlled Transient Photoinduced Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 177005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kazim, S.; Sharma, A.; Yadav, S.; Gajar, B.; Joshi, L.M.; Mishra, M.; Gupta, G.; Husale, S.; Gupta, A.; Sahoo, S.; et al. Light Induced Electron-Phonon Scattering Mediated Resistive Switching in Nanostructured Nb Thin Film Superconductor. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Prischepa, S.L.; Kushnir, V.N. Phonon Softening in Nanostructured Phonon–Mediated Superconductors (Review). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, 313003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Först, M.; Manzoni, C.; Kaiser, S.; Tomioka, Y.; Tokura, Y.; Merlin, R.; Cavalleri, A. Nonlinear Phononics as an Ultrafast Route to Lattice Control. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 854–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nava, A.; Giannetti, C.; Georges, A.; Tosatti, E.; Fabrizio, M. Cooling Quasiparticles in A3C60 Fullerides by Excitonic Mid-Infrared Absorption. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chiriacò, G.; Millis, A.J.; Aleiner, I.L. Transient Superconductivity without Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 220510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chiriacò, G.; Millis, A.J.; Aleiner, I.L. Negative Absolute Conductivity in Photoexcited Metals. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 041105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Dodge, J.S.; Lopez, L.; Sahota, D.G. Optical Saturation Produces Spurious Evidence for Photoinduced Superconductivity in K3C60. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 146002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Buzzi, M.; Nicoletti, D.; Rowe, E.; Wang, E.; Cavalleri, A. Comment on arXiv:2210.01114: Optical Saturation Produces Spurious Evidence for Photoinduced Superconductivity in K3C60. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.10169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Foxen, B.; Mutus, J.Y.; Lucero, E.; Graff, R.; Megrant, A.; Chen, Y.; Quintana, C.; Burkett, B.; Kelly, J.; Jeffrey, E.; et al. Qubit Compatible Superconducting Interconnects. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2017, 3, 014005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jarillo-Herrero, P.; van Dam, J.A.; Kouwenhoven, L.P. Quantum Supercurrent Transistors in Carbon Nanotubes. Nature 2006, 439, 953–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ando, F.; Miyasaka, Y.; Li, T.; Ishizuka, J.; Arakawa, T.; Shiota, Y.; Moriyama, T.; Yanase, Y.; Ono, T. Observation of Superconducting Diode Effect. Nature 2020, 584, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Karnetzky, C.; Zimmermann, P.; Trummer, C.; Duque Sierra, C.; Wörle, M.; Kienberger, R.; Holleitner, A. Towards Femtosecond On-Chip Electronics Based on Plasmonic Hot Electron Nano-Emitters. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Natarajan, C.M.; Tanner, M.G.; Hadfield, R.H. Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors: Physics and Applications. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2012, 25, 063001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Eshita, T.; Tamura, T.; Arimoto, Y. 14-Ferroelectric Random Access Memory (FRAM) Devices. In Advances in Non-Volatile Memory and Storage Technology; Nishi, Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 434–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Scott, J.F.; Paz de Araujo, C.A. Ferroelectric Memories. Science 1989, 246, 1400–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Salahuddin, S.; Datta, S. Use of Negative Capacitance to Provide Voltage Amplification for Low Power Nanoscale Devices. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Müller, J.; Böscke, T.S.; Schröder, U.; Mueller, S.; Bräuhaus, D.; Böttger, U.; Frey, L.; Mikolajick, T. Ferroelectricity in Simple Binary ZrO2 and HfO2. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4318–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hoffman, J.; Pan, X.; Reiner, J.W.; Walker, F.J.; Han, J.P.; Ahn, C.H.; Ma, T.P. Ferroelectric Field Effect Transistors for Memory Applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2957–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Schmid, S.W.; Pósa, L.; Török, T.N.; Sánta, B.; Pollner, Z.; Molnár, G.; Horst, Y.; Volk, J.; Leuthold, J.; Halbritter, A.; et al. Picosecond Femtojoule Resistive Switching in Nanoscale VO2 Memristors. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 21966–21974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Corti, E.; Gotsmann, B.; Moselund, K.; Ionescu, A.M.; Robertson, J.; Karg, S. Scaled Resistively-Coupled VO2 Oscillators for Neuromorphic Computing. Solid-State Electron. 2020, 168, 107729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Liu, C.; Tiw, P.J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Cai, L.; Yuan, R.; Pan, Z.; Yue, W.; Tao, Y.; Yang, Y. VO2 Memristor-Based Frequency Converter with in-Situ Synthesize and Mix for Wireless Internet-of-Things. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yuan, R.; Tiw, P.J.; Cai, L.; Yang, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, T.; Ge, C.; Huang, R.; Yang, Y. A Neuromorphic Physiological Signal Processing System Based on VO2 Memristor for Next-Generation Human-Machine Interface. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, G.; Xie, D.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Li, Q.; Ni, H.; Wang, J.; Guo, E.j.; et al. Photo-Induced Non-Volatile VO2 Phase Transition for Neuromorphic Ultraviolet Sensors. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kepič, P.; Horák, M.; Kabát, J.; Hájek, M.; Konečná, A.; Šikola, T.; Ligmajer, F. Coexisting Phases of Individual VO2 Nanoparticles for Multilevel Nanoscale Memory. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Basak, S.; Sun, Y.; Banguero, M.A.; Salev, P.; Schuller, I.K.; Aigouy, L.; Carlson, E.W.; Zimmers, A. Spatially Distributed Ramp Reversal Memory in VO2. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2300085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mallick, S.; Chowdhury, D.R. Terahertz Field Driven Active Switching in Vanadium Dioxide-Based Multilayer Metasurfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Electronics (ICEE), Bangalore, India, 11–14 December 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Suzuki, T.; Kubota, Y.; Mitsuishi, N.; Akatsuka, S.; Koga, J.; Sakano, M.; Masubuchi, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Togashi, T.; Ohsumi, H.; et al. Ultrafast Control of the Crystal Structure in a Topological Charge-Density-Wave Material. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 184305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhou, F.; Williams, J.; Sun, S.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Kemper, A.F.; Ruan, C.Y. Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking into a Hidden State of Charge-Density Wave. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. van Kampen, M.; Jozsa, C.; Kohlhepp, J.T.; LeClair, P.; Lagae, L.; de Jonge, W.J.M.; Koopmans, B. All-Optical Probe of Coherent Spin Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 227201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Cornelissen, L.J.; Liu, J.; Duine, R.A.; Youssef, J.B.; van Wees, B.J. Long-Distance Transport of Magnon Spin Information in a Magnetic Insulator at Room Temperature. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 1022–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Taghinejad, H.; Yamakawa, K.; Huang, X.; Lyu, Y.; Pritchard Cairns, L.; Husain, S.; Ramesh, R.; Analytis, J.G. Low-Field Regime of Magnon Transport in PLD-Grown YIG Films. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 6438–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Safranski, C.; Barsukov, I.; Lee, H.K.; Schneider, T.; Jara, A.A.; Smith, A.; Chang, H.; Lenz, K.; Lindner, J.; Tserkovnyak, Y.; et al. Spin Caloritronic Nano-Oscillator. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Nikitin, A.A.; Tatsenko, I.Y.; Kostylev, M.P.; Ustinov, A.B. Microwave Magnonic Micro-Oscillator Based on a Nm-Thick YIG Film. J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 135, 123906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lee, J.S.H.; Sutter, T.M.; Karapetrov, G.; Musumeci, P.; Kogar, A. Topological Phase Transition to a Hidden Charge Density Wave Liquid. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.04867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Merboldt, M.; Schüler, M.; Schmitt, D.; Bange, J.P.; Bennecke, W.; Gadge, K.; Pierz, K.; Schumacher, H.W.; Momeni, D.; Steil, D.; et al. Observation of Floquet States in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2025, 21, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Demidov, V.E.; Urazhdin, S.; Anane, A.; Cros, V.; Demokritov, S.O. Spin–Orbit-Torque Magnonics. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 170901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Fischer, T.; Kewenig, M.; Bozhko, D.A.; Serga, A.A.; Syvorotka, I.I.; Ciubotaru, F.; Adelmann, C.; Hillebrands, B.; Chumak, A.V. Experimental Prototype of a Spin-Wave Majority Gate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 152401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Balynsky, M.; Kozhevnikov, A.; Khivintsev, Y.; Bhowmick, T.; Gutierrez, D.; Chiang, H.; Dudko, G.; Filimonov, Y.; Liu, G.; Jiang, C.; et al. Magnonic Interferometric Switch for Multi-Valued Logic Circuits. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 024504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Imada, M.; Fujimori, A.; Tokura, Y. Metal-Insulator Transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1998, 70, 1039–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Han, Q.; Millis, A. Lattice Energetics and Correlation-Driven Metal-Insulator Transitions: The Case of Ca2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 067601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Bertinshaw, J.; Gurung, N.; Jorba, P.; Liu, H.; Schmid, M.; Mantadakis, D.T.; Daghofer, M.; Krautloher, M.; Jain, A.; Ryu, G.H.; et al. Unique Crystal Structure of Ca2RuO4 in the Current Stabilized Semimetallic State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 137204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tsubaki, K.; Tsurumaki-Fukuchi, A.; Katase, T.; Kamiya, T.; Arita, M.; Takahashi, Y. Dynamics of an Electrically Driven Phase Transition in Ca2RuO4 Thin Films: Nonequilibrium High-Speed Resistive Switching in the Absence of an Abrupt Thermal Transition. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2201303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Mattoni, G.; Yonezawa, S.; Nakamura, F.; Maeno, Y. Role of Local Temperature in the Current-Driven Metal–Insulator Transition of Ca2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 114414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Georges, A.; Kotliar, G.; Krauth, W.; Rozenberg, M.J. Dynamical Mean-Field Theory of Strongly Correlated Fermion Systems and the Limit of Infinite Dimensions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1996, 68, 13–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Matthies, A.; Li, J.; Eckstein, M. Control of Competing Superconductivity and Charge Order by Nonequilibrium Currents. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 180502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chiriacò, G.; Millis, A.J. Voltage-Induced Metal-Insulator Transition in a One-Dimensional Charge Density Wave. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 205152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Chiriacò, G.; Millis, A.J. Polarity Dependent Heating at the Phase Interface in Metal-Insulator Transitions. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 085116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y.; Li, H. Manipulating the Metal–Insulator Transitions and Thermoelectric Bi-Functionality for Correlated Vanadium Dioxide Pellets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024, 125, 032103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bradicich, A.; Yu, Y.; Brown, T.D.; Jardali, F.; Kumar, S.; Williams, R.S.; Shamberger, P.J. Electrically-Driven Metal-Insulator Transitions Emerging from Localizing Current Density and Temperature. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2025, 11, 2400975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kabir, S.; Nirantar, S.; Monshipouri, M.; Low, M.X.; Walia, S.; Sriram, S.; Bhaskaran, M. Device Geometry Insights for Efficient Electrically Driven Insulator-to-Metal Transition in Vanadium Dioxide Thin-Films. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8, 2100428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cao, X.; Chang, T.; Shao, Z.; Xu, F.; Luo, H.; Jin, P. Challenges and Opportunities toward Real Application of VO2-Based Smart Glazing. Matter 2020, 2, 862–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cao, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Lu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wei, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Compact Artificial Neuron Based on Anti-Ferroelectric Transistor. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Christensen, D.V.; Dittmann, R.; Linares-Barranco, B.; Sebastian, A.; Le Gallo, M.; Redaelli, A.; Slesazeck, S.; Mikolajick, T.; Spiga, S.; Menzel, S.; et al. 2022 Roadmap on Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering. Neuromorphic Comput. Eng. 2022, 2, 022501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Gao, X.; Roskamp, T.J.; Swoboda, T.; Rosário, C.M.M.; Smink, S.; Muñoz Rojo, M.; Hilgenkamp, H. Multibridge VO2 -Based Resistive Switching Devices in a Two-Terminal Configuration. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2300304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chiriacò, G. Thermal Purcell effect and cavity-induced renormalization of dissipations. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, L161107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Non-equilibrium drives as tuning parameters in quantum materials. Phase transitions in quantum materials can be manipulated via traditional control knobs such as temperature (T), magnetic field (B), pressure (P), chemical doping, or strain. Recent advances have introduced non-equilibrium drives—including ultrafast optical pulses and direct current injection—as novel and versatile tools to access hidden or metastable phases, not reachable under equilibrium conditions. Such drives enable ultrafast switching and spatially resolved phase control, opening pathways to dynamic electronic functionalities.
Figure 1. Non-equilibrium drives as tuning parameters in quantum materials. Phase transitions in quantum materials can be manipulated via traditional control knobs such as temperature (T), magnetic field (B), pressure (P), chemical doping, or strain. Recent advances have introduced non-equilibrium drives—including ultrafast optical pulses and direct current injection—as novel and versatile tools to access hidden or metastable phases, not reachable under equilibrium conditions. Such drives enable ultrafast switching and spatially resolved phase control, opening pathways to dynamic electronic functionalities.
Electronics 14 03552 g001
Figure 2. Overview of ultrafast experimental probes. (a) Schematic representation of key time-resolved techniques used to investigate non-equilibrium states in quantum materials. These include time-resolved optical spectroscopy (TOS), angle-resolved photoemission (trARPES), X-ray diffraction (trXRD), and ultrafast electron diffraction (UED), each offering distinct temporal and spatial sensitivities to structural and electronic dynamics. Adapted with permission from [41]. (b) Pump–probe setup for time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (trRIXS). An optical pump excites the material, while the delayed X-ray probe captures the dynamics with sub-picosecond resolution. Adapted with permission from [80].
Figure 2. Overview of ultrafast experimental probes. (a) Schematic representation of key time-resolved techniques used to investigate non-equilibrium states in quantum materials. These include time-resolved optical spectroscopy (TOS), angle-resolved photoemission (trARPES), X-ray diffraction (trXRD), and ultrafast electron diffraction (UED), each offering distinct temporal and spatial sensitivities to structural and electronic dynamics. Adapted with permission from [41]. (b) Pump–probe setup for time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (trRIXS). An optical pump excites the material, while the delayed X-ray probe captures the dynamics with sub-picosecond resolution. Adapted with permission from [80].
Electronics 14 03552 g002
Figure 3. Light-induced phase transitions via modification of the free energy landscape. (a) The system, initially in a disordered equilibrium state (red dot), is driven (red arrow) by a pump pulse (represented by the yellow arrow) into a symmetry-breaking regime, resulting in the emergence of an ordered phase (blue dot). (b) Alternatively, the pump may access a hidden competing metastable phase (green dots), already present in the free energy landscape but not favored at equilibrium, which may be metastable (red arrow with the asterisk) —and thus can only survive transiently—or degenerate (dashed red arrow) with the equilibrium state, which is indicated by the blue dot. These two frameworks underpin many recent observations of light-induced superconductivity, ferroelectricity, and charge density wave order. Conceptual sketches inspired by scenarios discussed in Refs. [109,110,111,112,113].
Figure 3. Light-induced phase transitions via modification of the free energy landscape. (a) The system, initially in a disordered equilibrium state (red dot), is driven (red arrow) by a pump pulse (represented by the yellow arrow) into a symmetry-breaking regime, resulting in the emergence of an ordered phase (blue dot). (b) Alternatively, the pump may access a hidden competing metastable phase (green dots), already present in the free energy landscape but not favored at equilibrium, which may be metastable (red arrow with the asterisk) —and thus can only survive transiently—or degenerate (dashed red arrow) with the equilibrium state, which is indicated by the blue dot. These two frameworks underpin many recent observations of light-induced superconductivity, ferroelectricity, and charge density wave order. Conceptual sketches inspired by scenarios discussed in Refs. [109,110,111,112,113].
Electronics 14 03552 g003
Figure 4. Experimental signatures of photoinduced superconductivity in cuprates and fullerides. (a) Schematic of pump–probe experiments in cuprates where mid-infrared pulses induce transient superconducting-like features. Adapted with permission from [12]. (b) Crystal structure of K 3 C 60 , showing potassium atoms (red) embedded within a lattice of C 60 fullerene molecules. (c) Optical response of photoexcited K 3 C 60 , showing reflectivity (left), real part of the conductivity (middle) and imaginary part of the conductivity (right) as functions of the probe energy. Data are taken in equilibrium (solid red curve), 1 ps after photoexcitation (blue circles) and 5 ps after photoexcitation (empty triangles). The post-pump response exhibits signatures indicative of a superconducting-like gap and divergent imaginary conductivity. The figures in (b,c) are adapted with permission from [21].
Figure 4. Experimental signatures of photoinduced superconductivity in cuprates and fullerides. (a) Schematic of pump–probe experiments in cuprates where mid-infrared pulses induce transient superconducting-like features. Adapted with permission from [12]. (b) Crystal structure of K 3 C 60 , showing potassium atoms (red) embedded within a lattice of C 60 fullerene molecules. (c) Optical response of photoexcited K 3 C 60 , showing reflectivity (left), real part of the conductivity (middle) and imaginary part of the conductivity (right) as functions of the probe energy. Data are taken in equilibrium (solid red curve), 1 ps after photoexcitation (blue circles) and 5 ps after photoexcitation (empty triangles). The post-pump response exhibits signatures indicative of a superconducting-like gap and divergent imaginary conductivity. The figures in (b,c) are adapted with permission from [21].
Electronics 14 03552 g004
Figure 5. Current-induced insulator-to-metal transition in Ca 2 RuO 4 . (a) Crystal structure of Ca 2 RuO 4 : composed of corner-sharing RuO 6 octahedra and intercalated Ca atoms (in blue). Adapted with permission from [156]. (b) Evolution of the lattice constant across the IMT as driven by temperature (left), pressure (center), and electric field (right). The red dots indicate the insulating phase, the red dots indicate the metallic phase, the cyan area indicat the coexistence region. Adapted with permission from [54]. (c) Insulator-to-metal transition, as observed from the I V characteristic curve. The red curve represents the insulator to metal branch of the transition, while the blue curve is the metal to insulator branch of the hysteresis curve. Adapted with permission from [54]. (d) Electric field required to trigger the IMT as a function of temperature. Adapted with permission from [54]. (e) Nano-imaging of phase coexistence in the current-driven IMT: as current is increased the system is insulating (brighter region, domain S) and voltage also increases (curve 1); beyond a current threshold, voltage starts decreasing (curve 2) and darker areas nucleate (L domain) indicating the emergence of the metallic phase that coexists with insulating domains ( S ). Adapted with permission from [105].
Figure 5. Current-induced insulator-to-metal transition in Ca 2 RuO 4 . (a) Crystal structure of Ca 2 RuO 4 : composed of corner-sharing RuO 6 octahedra and intercalated Ca atoms (in blue). Adapted with permission from [156]. (b) Evolution of the lattice constant across the IMT as driven by temperature (left), pressure (center), and electric field (right). The red dots indicate the insulating phase, the red dots indicate the metallic phase, the cyan area indicat the coexistence region. Adapted with permission from [54]. (c) Insulator-to-metal transition, as observed from the I V characteristic curve. The red curve represents the insulator to metal branch of the transition, while the blue curve is the metal to insulator branch of the hysteresis curve. Adapted with permission from [54]. (d) Electric field required to trigger the IMT as a function of temperature. Adapted with permission from [54]. (e) Nano-imaging of phase coexistence in the current-driven IMT: as current is increased the system is insulating (brighter region, domain S) and voltage also increases (curve 1); beyond a current threshold, voltage starts decreasing (curve 2) and darker areas nucleate (L domain) indicating the emergence of the metallic phase that coexists with insulating domains ( S ). Adapted with permission from [105].
Electronics 14 03552 g005
Table 1. Overview of the most promising non-equilibrium phases (first column), the material on which they have been studied or implemented (second column), the corresponding applications to electronic devices (third column) and the relevant references (fourth column).
Table 1. Overview of the most promising non-equilibrium phases (first column), the material on which they have been studied or implemented (second column), the corresponding applications to electronic devices (third column) and the relevant references (fourth column).
PhaseMaterialUse CaseReferences
SCon-chip K 3 C 60 ,
Nb nanowires
Superconducting switches
and interconnects
[24,117,125,128]
K 3 C 60 Superconducting transistors[115,126,127]
IMTdoped VO 2 Smart devices[70,77,167]
VO 2 Resistive Switch[69,76,77,78,135,170]
Nanoscale VO 2 Memory[135,140,141]
VO 2 memristor arraysNeuromorphic computing[136,137,138,139]
FE SrTiO 3 Ultrafast memory[27]
hBNMemory (FeFET)[35]
Cr 2 O 3 Electronic FeRAM[32]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiriacò, G. Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics. Electronics 2025, 14, 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173552

AMA Style

Chiriacò G. Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics. Electronics. 2025; 14(17):3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiriacò, Giuliano. 2025. "Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics" Electronics 14, no. 17: 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173552

APA Style

Chiriacò, G. (2025). Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics. Electronics, 14(17), 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop