Next Article in Journal
High-Speed SMVs Subscriber Design for FPGA Architectures
Previous Article in Journal
Gross Domestic Product Forecasting Using Deep Learning Models with a Phase-Adaptive Attention Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

W-Band Microstrip Antenna Arrays on Glass

1
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
2
Institute for Carbon-Based Thin Film Electronics, Peking University, Shanxi (ICTFE-PKU), Taiyuan 030012, China
3
Chongqing Institute of Carbon-Based Integrated Circuits, Peking University, Chongqing 401332, China
4
Center for Carbon-Based Electronics and School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2025, 14(11), 2133; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112133 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 April 2025 / Revised: 20 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 24 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design for Microwave and Millimeter Wave Application)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a compact 2 × 2 on-chip microstrip antenna array operating for W-band applications. The design utilizes a low-loss glass substrate to mitigate dielectric losses and integrates an embedded feeding structure with wideband T-junction power dividers, addressing bandwidth limitations and feed network losses in conventional approaches. Experimental results demonstrate a relative bandwidth of 10.1% (76.11–83.87 GHz) with gain exceeding 10 dBi across the bandwidth, closely aligning with simulated predictions. This work provides a cost-effective solution for millimeter-wave and terahertz antenna systems, balancing high-performance requirements with fabrication simplicity for automotive radar and 5G/6G communication applications.

1. Introduction

The rapid advancement of millimeter-wave (30–300 GHz) and terahertz (0.1–10 THz) technologies has positioned on-chip microstrip antenna arrays (Figure 1) as critical components in high-frequency integrated systems. Compared to traditional discrete antennas, these arrays offer significant advantages, including reduced packaging complexity, minimized interconnection losses through direct integration into semiconductor substrates, and inherent benefits such as low cost, low profile, and high consistency. These attributes make them ideal for compact radio-frequency front-ends in applications spanning millimeter-wave radar, 5G/6G communications, and high-speed wireless data transmission [1,2,3].
Despite these advantages, the practical deployment of on-chip microstrip antenna arrays faces substantial challenges. First, conventional substrate materials (e.g., silicon and GaAs) exhibit high dielectric loss tangents (tan δ > 0.01) and pronounced parasitic coupling effects at high frequencies, severely degrading radiation efficiency. This results in limited gain and narrow operational bandwidth. For instance, prior studies on 2 × 2 on-chip arrays demonstrated modest gains of 6.75 dBi [4], 8.5 dBi [5], and 6.9 dBi [6] on silicon and GaAs substrates, while a 94 GHz silicon-based array achieved a bandwidth of only 1 GHz [7]. Second, existing designs often employ complex fabrication techniques—such as through silicon vias (TSVs) or multilayer stacking to mitigate surface wave losses, which escalate manufacturing costs and compromise reliability [8]. Finally, performance inconsistencies caused by substrate material variations further hinder the scalability of millimeter-wave and terahertz on-chip antenna arrays [9,10].
To address these challenges, fused silica glass emerges as a promising solution due to their exceptional high-frequency properties. With an ultra-low loss tangent (tan δ < 0.001 at 77 GHz) and stable dielectric constant (εr ≈ 3.9), the fused silica glass significantly mitigates substrate losses and suppresses surface wave excitation, thereby enhancing gain and radiation efficiency [11]. Additionally, its isotropic mechanical and thermal stability ensure excellent agreement between simulated and measured antenna parameters in millimeter-wave bands—a critical advantage for high-precision, low-loss designs [12]. However, the performance of such arrays remains constrained by two critical challenges: feed network losses persist as a dominant efficiency bottleneck in array architectures, while simultaneously achieving broadband operation and high gain requires innovative design trade-offs.
This paper presents a W-band 2 × 2 on-chip antenna array fabricated on a fused silica glass, offering a cost-effective solution for millimeter-wave systems. The key contributions include the adoption of an embedded feeding structure and T-junction power dividers to minimize feedline losses while extending impedance-matching bandwidth, the integration of ultra-low-loss fused silica glass with 500 nm gold microstrip lines to mitigate conductor losses caused by skin effects, and the co-optimization of radiating elements and feed networks to achieve broadband high-gain performance across 76.11–83.87 GHz. These advancements collectively address critical challenges in high-frequency on-chip antenna design, demonstrating significant potential for applications in 6G communications and automotive radar.

2. Antenna Array Design

2.1. Antenna Unit Design

The proposed antenna employs a fused silica glass as its dielectric substrate, and a comprehensive analysis of properties and cost for common antenna substrates is detailed in Table 1. Boasting an exceptionally low dielectric constant and an extremely low tangent of loss angle, the glass demonstrates a remarkable performance in high-frequency antenna applications by significantly reducing energy dissipation while maintaining superior radiation efficiency. Compared to alternative substrates with equivalent high-frequency capabilities such as sapphire and Rogers 5880, it presents an incomparable economic advantage due to its substantially lower fabrication costs (reduced by 95% and 20%). Moreover, the substrate’s exceptionally low coefficient of thermal expansion ensures minimal susceptibility to temperature variations, rendering it ideally suited for deployment in complex environmental conditions. The glass substrate has an ultralow dielectric loss, stable permittivity, and competitive fabrication costs, making it an ideal antenna substrate for mm wave and terahertz applications.
The proposed antenna array utilizes rectangular patch elements as its fundamental radiating units, with their dimensional parameters precisely determined through rigorous microstrip radiation principal calculations, ensuring that the patch length and width satisfy the fundamental design criteria established in Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
L = c 2 f c ε e 2 Δ L
W = c 2 f c ε r + 1 2
where c denotes the vacuum speed of light, f c represents the operation frequency of the antenna, and ε e signifies the effective dielectric constant.
The operation frequency f c and effective dielectric constant ε e are rigorously determined through the analytical solutions presented in Equations (3) and (4).
ε e = ε r 1 2 1 + 12 · h w + ε r + 1 2
Δ L = w h + 0.264 ε e + 0.3 w h + 0.8 ε e 0.258 × 0.412 h
where λ g denotes the guided wavelength within the medium, λ g = c / f c ε e .
The proposed microstrip patch antenna design features a monolithic glass substrate with an optimized 200 μm thickness for 77 GHz operation, employing a 500 nm thick gold transmission line to suppress the skin depth effects while maintaining radiation efficiency. The antenna’s design parameters, including patch length (L), width (W), and feed line dimensions, were derived through the analytical modeling of electromagnetic wave propagation in dielectric media, as shown in Table 2.
Microstrip antenna elements inherently suffer from bandwidth constriction and suboptimal gain/directional performance, limitations that can be effectively mitigated through the implementation of embedded feeding mechanisms. These mechanisms introduce additional resonant modes, enhancing bandwidth while optimizing radiation efficiency. Figure 2a,b provides a comparative schematic of conventional microstrip antenna elements versus their insertion-fed counterparts, highlighting the architectural differences. To evaluate the performance improvements, the reflection coefficients (S11 parameters) and gain radiation patterns in both the E-plane and H-plane were numerically investigated for two distinct microstrip patch antenna configurations using 3D electromagnetic (3D-EM) simulation. The results, illustrated in Figure 2c–f, demonstrate that the modified structure with the embedded-feed mechanism achieves significant performance enhancements. Specifically, the operational bandwidth satisfying the −10 dB return loss criterion expands from 75.14–78.84 GHz to 75.17–79.17 GHz, representing an absolute bandwidth increase from 3.70 GHz to 4.00 GHz and a relative bandwidth improvement from 4.8% to 5.2%. Furthermore, the radiation patterns exhibit stabilized half-power beamwidths in both the E plane and H plane directions, converging to approximately 83° compared to the original 81–90° angular variation. These results collectively validate the superior operational bandwidth, gain characteristics, and directional stability achieved through the inset feeding strategy in microstrip patch antenna design.

2.2. Antenna Array Construction

Due to the inherent limitations in gain and the directionality of single-element antennas, which fail to meet system requirements, the adoption of an antenna array architecture is essential to achieve the prescribed performance specifications.
The array design targets a gain of 11 ± 1 dBi. Given that each doubling of antenna elements contributes approximately 3 dBi to the overall gain, and considering the single-element peak gain of 6.75 dBi, a four-element configuration is required. To optimize the structural compactness and fabrication simplicity while satisfying performance criteria, a 2 × 2 planar array architecture represents the strategic choice, effectively balancing radiation enhancement with dimensional constraints.
The feeding network incorporates quarter-wavelength impedance-matching transmission lines that are strategically integrated with T-junction power dividers, as shown in Figure 3. This configuration forms an optimized architecture that ensures the impedance continuity between radiating elements and transmission paths. The hybrid design systematically addresses multi-stage impedance transformation requirements while maintaining signal integrity across all array branches.
Element spacing critically governs radiation integrity. Excessive spacing (dx) leads to grating lobe formation, which diverts parasitic radiative flux and consequently degrades gain performance. For microstrip array architectures, the optimal spacing parameter dx must adhere to the dimensional constraints specified in Equation (5). This approach enhances the principal lobe while effectively suppressing parasitic radiation modes.
d x < λ g 1 + sin θ
Optimal element spacing achieves a critical balance, with the empirically established value of d x = λ g effectively suppressing the grating lobes along undesired angular trajectories (θ) while maximizing radiative efficiency. This strategic spatial distribution preserves the integrity of the principal lobe, delivering peak gain-directivity performance by rigorously avoiding energy diffractive dispersal mechanisms.
The final optimized feeding network for the 2 × 2 microstrip patch array is methodically illustrated in Figure 3. Compared with conventional series-fed configurations, the implementation of a T-junction power divider not only ensures the equitable distribution of input power across each radiating element, but also effectively circumvents phase shift accumulation along the transmission path. Furthermore, the incorporated phase-matching topology within the divider architecture substantially suppresses the return loss while maintaining exceptional amplitude coherence throughout the operating bandwidth.
Figure 4 presents the simulation results, which include the reflection coefficient S11, the gain radiation patterns for both the E-plane and H-plane, and the 3D gain pattern of the antenna array. The antenna exhibits a return loss below −10 dB across the 74.82–82.67 GHz spectrum, achieving an absolute bandwidth of 7.85 GHz (the relative bandwidth up to 10.2%). The half-power beamwidths for the E-plane and H-plane range between 63° and 65°, demonstrating excellent directional performance. Notably, the implementation of the antenna array yields significant improvements in bandwidth, gain, and directivity, delivering robust technical performance that fully complies with the design specifications.

3. Fabrication and Results

The performance evaluation of the antenna array employs a ground-signal-ground (GSG) probe configuration for precise characterization, with the detailed probe topology illustrated in Figure 5a. This specialized contact interface ensures accurate radiofrequency measurements by maintaining controlled impedance through an optimized ground plane arrangement and minimized parasitic coupling. The GSG configuration integrates radiators with extended interconnecting feedlines inserted into precisely dimensioned contact pads, designed to meet the 100 μm pitch probe tip requirements. Critical ground plane geometries were parametrically optimized through rigorous electromagnetic simulations, resulting in final pad dimensions of LP = 500 μm and WP = 800 μm, complemented by positioning slots measuring LC = 200 μm and WC = 150 μm for optimal impedance matching. Figure 5a presents the complete antenna array architecture incorporating these measurement-optimized interface structures.
The microstrip antenna array is fabricated on a 4-inch fused silica glass wafer with a thickness of 200 μm, featuring antenna patterns formed from 500 nm thick gold metallization. Through photolithographic patterning and chemical development processes, the antenna geometry is precisely transferred from the photomask to the wafer. Subsequently, vacuum metallization coupled with precision lift-off techniques transforms the photolithographic patterns into functional metallic antenna structures. The crystalline substrate then undergoes precisely controlled dicing processes to yield individual antenna arrays ready for implementation or characterization. Upon the completion of the exquisitely coordinated fabrication procedures delineated above, the antenna array configuration exhibited in Figure 5 was definitively ascertained. This monolayer antenna architecture eliminates multi-layer alignment complexities, enabling complete fabrication through a single processing sequence. Moreover, the compact 2 × 2 antenna array configuration permits the batch production of multiple units per wafer, substantially reducing the processing intricacy and manufacturing costs through enhanced productivity.
In S-parameter and radiation characteristic measurements, antennas require the precise alignment and calibration of RF probes via GSG probe stations to ensure measurement accuracy. Initial probe adjustment involves leveling the tips perpendicular to the substrate plane. Subsequently, the probes are connected to SOLT calibration standards containing short, open, and 50 Ω loads, with a detailed characterization of the reflection coefficients (S11/S22) and transmission coefficients (S21/S12) across operational frequencies. Measurement protocols mandate the avoidance of physical contact with the test structure during measurement to prevent probe misalignment. This systematic calibration methodology ensures proper system calibration, minimizing loss and ensuring reliable measurement results.
The microstrip patch antenna array was characterized through S-parameter measurements using a ground-signal-ground (GSG) probe-connected vector network analyzer (VNA). The probing system incorporated Newertest’s 110 GHz millimeter-wave test probes, while the VNA system comprised a Keysight PNA-L series instrument with a fundamental measurement range of 50 GHz, extended to 110 GHz via broadband frequency extension modules. The measured S11 reflection characteristics are presented in Figure 6a.
The radiation characteristics were measured using a millimeter-wave anechoic chamber and an automated antenna testing platform integrating an antenna under test positioning control and antenna instrumentation processing. Figure 6b provides a comparative analysis of the simulated versus measured antenna gain patterns.
The measured results of the microstrip antenna array, as presented in Figure 6, show excellent agreement with the simulation predictions across both return loss and radiation characteristics. The fabricated antenna demonstrates an impedance bandwidth from 76.11 to 83.87 GHz (10.1% relative bandwidth), completely encompassing the designed 77 GHz operational frequency while achieving a peak gain of 10.57 dBi. The measured radiation patterns exhibit remarkable consistency with simulations, particularly in main beam alignment, side lobe levels, and beamwidth characteristics, confirming the design’s effectiveness in meeting the target performance specifications.
Table 3 provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance characteristics of this work against recent W-band microstrip antenna designs. The proposed configuration demonstrates distinct advantages, including a notably broad operational bandwidth, and exceptional gain retention achieved with a minimal 2 × 2 element configuration. This streamlined architecture not only meets millimeter-wave radar requirements with enhanced structural simplicity but also facilitates cost-effective mass production through simplified manufacturing processes, making it highly suitable for on-chip integration in advanced millimeter-wave systems.

4. Conclusions

This work successfully demonstrates a compact W-band 2 × 2 on-chip microstrip antenna array fabricated on a glass substrate, showcasing significant advantages in bandwidth, gain, and manufacturability. The glass substrate, with its ultra-low dielectric loss and stable permittivity, enables the array to achieve a 10.1% fractional bandwidth (76.11–83.87 GHz) and a peak gain of 10.57 dBi, while maintaining consistent radiation patterns with beamwidths of 63–65°. The measured performance aligns closely with 3D-EM simulation results, validating the design’s effectiveness. Furthermore, the use of the glass substrate enhances structural simplicity, reduces fabrication costs, and supports the compatibility with standard semiconductor processes, making it an ideal platform for millimeter-wave and terahertz antenna applications. These attributes position the proposed antenna array as a highly suitable solution for next-generation systems, including automotive radar and 6G communication frontends.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; Methodology, Y.L.; Validation, Y.L.; Formal analysis, Y.L.; Investigation, Y.L., H.M., H.P. and H.L.; Resources, H.M. and H.P.; Data curation, Y.L., H.M. and H.P.; Writing—original draft, Y.L.; Writing—review & editing, Y.L., H.M., H.P. and H.L.; Supervision, Y.L.; Project administration, H.L.; Funding acquisition, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported in part by the National Key Research & Development Program (grant No. 2024YFA1209700) and Peking Nanofab Laboratory.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aziz, I.; Liao, W.-C.; Aliakbari, H.; Simon, W. Compact and low cost linear antenna array for millimeter wave automotive radar applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–20 March 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Karim, R.; Iftikhar, A.; Ramzan, R. Performance-issues-mitigation-techniques for on-chip-antennas Recent developments in RF, MM-Wave, and THz bands with future directions. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 219577–219610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karim, R.; Iftikhar, A.; Ijaz, B.; Mabrouk, I.B. The potentials, challenges, and future directions of on-chip-antennas for emerging wireless applications—A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 173897–173934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Sun, M.; Guo, L.H. On-chip antennas for 60-GHz radios in silicon technology. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2005, 52, 1664–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ribeiro, R.; Mendes, C.; Pinho, P.; Teixeira, A. On-Chip Microstrip Antenna Array for Millimeter Wave Technology. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and INC/USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (AP-S/INC-USNC-URSI), Firenze, Italy, 14–19 July 2024; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; See, C.H.; Fishlock, S.J.; Soin, N.; McLaughlin, J.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Limiti, E. Terahertz on-chip antenna based on metasurface and SIW with stacked layers of resonators on GaAs substrate. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 82918–82928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Su, Y.; Cao, R.; Tao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, X. Design of 94GHz series-fed microstrip antenna array. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Cape Town, South Africa, 5–9 September 2022; pp. 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, D. Compact high-gain mmWave antenna for TSV-based system-in-package application. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2020, 30, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pauli, M.; Göttel, B.; Scherr, S.; Bhutani, A.; Ayhan, S.; Winkler, W.; Zwick, T. Miniaturized Millimeter-Wave Radar Sensor for High-Accuracy Application. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 1707–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beer, S.; Hitzler, M.; Waldschmidt, C. An integrated 122-GHz antenna array with wire bond compensation for SMT radar sensors. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 5976–5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, L.; Tang, M.; Gao, Z.; Mao, J.; Yue, H.; Tang, Y. Design and fabrication of patch antenna array on quartz glass substrate at 146 GHz. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, B.; Tang, Y.; Yue, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Deng, X. A D-band wideband low-cost array for antenna-in-package applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2023, 65, 1974–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pang, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, Z.; Cao, R. Band Planar Series-Fed Antenna Array. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), Chengdu, China, 6–9 December 2019; pp. 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, J.; Wang, H.; Yin, J.; Yu, C.; Hong, W. Planar series-fed antenna array for 77 GHz automotive radar. In Proceedings of the 2017 Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP), Xi’an, China, 16–19 October 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qi, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, R.; Tao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J. Design of an 8 × 8 parallel-fed mm-wave microstrip antenna array for wireless power transmission. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Cape Town, South Africa, 5–9 September 2022; pp. 242–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, T.-M.; Kao, T.-Y.-J.; Huang, T.-Y.; Tu, J.; Lin, J.; Wu, R.-B. Antenna design of 60-GHz micro-radar System-In-Package for noncontact vital sign detection. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 1702–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. On-chip microstrip antenna arrays.
Figure 1. On-chip microstrip antenna arrays.
Electronics 14 02133 g001
Figure 2. Structure and simulation parameters for two types of W-band microstrip antenna units: (a) patch antenna unit, (c) S11 parameter, and (e) gain patterns for conventional microstrip antenna unit; and the (b) patch antenna unit, (d) S11 parameter, and (f) gain patterns for embedded-feed microstrip antenna unit.
Figure 2. Structure and simulation parameters for two types of W-band microstrip antenna units: (a) patch antenna unit, (c) S11 parameter, and (e) gain patterns for conventional microstrip antenna unit; and the (b) patch antenna unit, (d) S11 parameter, and (f) gain patterns for embedded-feed microstrip antenna unit.
Electronics 14 02133 g002aElectronics 14 02133 g002b
Figure 3. The 2 × 2 embedded-feed microstrip antenna arrays with T-junction power divider.
Figure 3. The 2 × 2 embedded-feed microstrip antenna arrays with T-junction power divider.
Electronics 14 02133 g003
Figure 4. The 3D-EM simulation results for the 2 × 2 microstrip antenna arrays: (a) S11 parameters (b) E-plane and H-plane gain patterns; and (c) 3D gain pattern.
Figure 4. The 3D-EM simulation results for the 2 × 2 microstrip antenna arrays: (a) S11 parameters (b) E-plane and H-plane gain patterns; and (c) 3D gain pattern.
Electronics 14 02133 g004
Figure 5. Optical micrograph of fabricated 2 × 2 microstrip antenna array on glass: (a) Microstrip antenna array with the T-junction power divider; and (b) GSG pad for RF measurement.
Figure 5. Optical micrograph of fabricated 2 × 2 microstrip antenna array on glass: (a) Microstrip antenna array with the T-junction power divider; and (b) GSG pad for RF measurement.
Electronics 14 02133 g005
Figure 6. Simulation and measured parameters of the microstrip antenna array: (a) reflection coefficient S11 parameter; and (b) gain patterns.
Figure 6. Simulation and measured parameters of the microstrip antenna array: (a) reflection coefficient S11 parameter; and (b) gain patterns.
Electronics 14 02133 g006
Table 1. Comparison of common antenna substrates.
Table 1. Comparison of common antenna substrates.
MaterialDielectric Constant, ε r Tangent of Loss Angle tan δCTE, ppm/°CCost
Silicon11.7~11.90.01~0.022.6Low
Sapphire9.3~11.50.0001~0.00025.0 (c axis)
6.7 (a axis)
High
LTCC5.0~7.50.002~0.0055.0–7.0Low
FR44.3~4.70.02~0.0313–17 (X–Y plane) 15–70 (Z axis)Low
Glass3.90.00010.55Low
Rogers 58802.200.000917Medium
Table 2. Design parameters for the antenna unit.
Table 2. Design parameters for the antenna unit.
ParameterDimension/mm
Rectangular patch length0.88
Rectangular patch width1.24
Effective dielectric constant3.24
Substrate thickness0.2
Patch thickness0.0005
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed antenna array with reported microstrip antennas.
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed antenna array with reported microstrip antennas.
Ref.Antenna
Structure
Center
Freq. (GHz)
FBWMaximum Gain (dBi)
[7]8 × 894 GHz1.0%22
[13]1 × 894 GHz1.3%14.2
[14]1 × 1677 GHz2.5%15
[15]8 × 894 GHz5.8%24
[16]2 × 260 GHz12.8%9.7
This work2 × 277 GHz10.1%10.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Ma, H.; Peng, H.; Liu, H. W-Band Microstrip Antenna Arrays on Glass. Electronics 2025, 14, 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112133

AMA Style

Li Y, Ma H, Peng H, Liu H. W-Band Microstrip Antenna Arrays on Glass. Electronics. 2025; 14(11):2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuanchen, Hui Ma, Hong Peng, and Honggang Liu. 2025. "W-Band Microstrip Antenna Arrays on Glass" Electronics 14, no. 11: 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112133

APA Style

Li, Y., Ma, H., Peng, H., & Liu, H. (2025). W-Band Microstrip Antenna Arrays on Glass. Electronics, 14(11), 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop