Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper an anti-jamming solution for satellite communications is explored, in the context of equilibrium approximation, focusing on the multi-channel power optimization scenario.

Proofing: the manuscript requires thorough language and grammar proofing before publication. Indicative comments:

-          line 15: …problem into an on line shortest…

-          line 20: …problem formed in confrontation…

-          line 70: …very serious, therefore it is of great significance…

-          line 78: …it is not necessary for the communication parties…

-          line 80: …in this case is to minimize…

-          line 90: sentence should break into at least two sentences in order to convey its meaning correctly

-          line 110: …works on multi-channel…

-          line 134: …each round of interaction…

-          line 138: …When a participant allocates…

-          line 142: …are almost limitless…

-          line 165: …scenario belongs…

-          line 167: …and dynamically learn and…

-          …

-          line 512: …mainly models and solves…

-          line 520: …into an online shortest…

The paper is well structured with adequately backed formulations and illustrations. Although this work is sufficiently complete as is, the content could be further enhanced with a short talk of whether the solutions presented could be implemented and adopted as ‘in-the-box’ solutions, that is if they could be deployed in current (existing) satellite systems or are ‘out-of-the box’ ideas that could only be integrated from scratch in the comm systems of future satellite systems.  Adding to the previous suggestion, a short complexity analysis of the algorithmic solution in order to indicate if real-time operation is possible would be a welcome enhancement.

Concerning the mathematical formulation in eq. (2), the W^k parameter is not defined.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

To authors.

I'm happy to review your valuable paper.

Here are some comments after reviewing your paper.

1. Jamming method

- Recently, the partial band jammer and AWGN jammer have been popular in satellite communication because of the simple way to degrade SNR for HTS based on DVB-RCS/S2

- I'm wondering why authors consider the frequency hopping jammer instead of partial and noise jammers.

 

2. Theoretical analysis

- In order to verify the suggested Do-SINR, authors should provide the theoretical derivation process to reviewers such as supplements to help reviewers understand. 

3. Experiment

- I strongly suggest that the authors should add the practical experiment result to verify the suggested algorithm. 

- It is hard to understand the proposed algorithm to work in a practical satellite environment.

 

Thanks.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

To authors.

Thank you for your revising.