Improving the Energy Efficiency of Software-Defined Networks through the Prediction of Network Configurations
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In this paper, authors have described a Machine Learning solution based on Logistic Regression to predict energy-efficient network configurations in SDN without the need to execute optimal or heuristic solutions at the SDN controller which require a higher computation time. Experimental results over a realistic network topology show that our solution is able to predict network configurations with a high feasibility (>95%), hence improving the energy savings achieved by a benchmark heuristic based on Genetic Algorithms. Moreover, the time required for computation is reduced by a factor of more than 500,000 times.
The topic is significant in the SDN and networking. The authors have described the solution well.
I have the following recommendations regarding improvements in the paper.
Describe a subsection after introduction i.e., research gap between the previous works (Research Gap)
On page 2, lines 47-49, the importance of central management is described in SDN. Hence, I recommend mentioning some related literature to it. For example, the following works describes the significance of central management and controller in SDN.
1. "Quality of service improvement with optimal software-defined networking controller and control plane clustering." Comput. Mater. Contin 67 (2021): 849-875.
2. “QoS improvement with an optimum controller selection for software-defined networks”. Plos one, 14(5), p.e0217631.
Mention the main contribution points in numbered or bullets form after the introduction section
Include some future directions.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have well addressed all my concerns, no further comments.