Next Article in Journal
Active Sense: Early Staging of Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM) Hinges upon Recognizing Daily Activity Pattern
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Source Topologies for Photovoltaic Applications: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
A Custom Sensor Network for Autonomous Water Quality Assessment in Fish Farms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Practical Challenges of High-Power IGBT’s I-V Curve Measurement and Its Importance in Reliability Analysis
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

A Survey of Wireless Battery Management System: Topology, Emerging Trends, and Challenges

Akash Samanta
1,* and
Sheldon S. Williamson
Department of Applied Physics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700009, India
Department of Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2021, 10(18), 2193;
Submission received: 13 August 2021 / Revised: 1 September 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 7 September 2021


An effective battery management system (BMS) is indispensable for any lithium-ion battery (LIB) powered systems such as electric vehicles (EVs) and stationary grid-tied energy storage systems. Massive wire harness, scalability issue, physical failure of wiring, and high implementation cost and weight are some of the major issues in conventional wired-BMS. One of the promising solutions researchers have come up with is the wireless BMS (WBMS) architecture. Despite research and development on WBMS getting momentum more than a decade ago, it is still in a preliminary stage. Significant further upgradation is required towards developing an industry-ready WBMS, especially for high-power LIB packs. Therefore, an in-depth survey exclusively on WBMS architectures is presented in this article. The aim is to provide a summary of the existing developments as well as to present an informative guide to the research community for future developments by highlighting the issues, emerging trends, and challenges. In-depth analysis of the existing WBMS topologies will not only help the researchers to understand the existing challenges and future research scopes clearly but at the same time enthuse them to focus their research inclination in the domain of WBMS.

1. Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are extensively used as a primary battery energy storage system in high power battery packs typically used in electric vehicles (EVs) and stationary grid-tied energy storage stations. However, the narrow safe operating area necessitates an effective battery management system (BMS) for almost all practical purposes [1,2,3]. Some of the common functionalities of a BMS includes state of charge (SOC) estimation [4,5] and state of health (SOH) estimation [6,7], temperature measurement/estimation [8], cell balancing [9], fault detection/diagnosis [10] and thermal management [11]. BMS consists of several hardware components such as sensors, microcontrollers and software to perform all these functionalities. Therefore, a suitable communication architecture is essential for establishing data communication inside the BMS among internal sensors and controllers alongside communication with external devices for data storage, display and external control.
Traditionally wired-BMS are widely used in battery-powered systems where Controller Area Network (CAN)-bus, and I2C/SPI communication protocols are generally employed. CAN-bus communication requires a massive wire mesh to collect sensor data and transmit it to the master controller of BMS leading to very high implementation cost, weight, design complexity and the galvanic isolation of the cells. Placement of sophisticated controllers of BMS at a safe distance from the battery pack is also challenging due to extended wiring requirement. Wired-BMS can face physical connection failure due to the vibratory working condition of EVs leading to low reliability of the BMS. Troubleshooting in wired-BMS is also difficult due to massive wirings. These issues of wired-BMS started becoming more and more challenging with the increasing application of high-capacity LIB packs consisting of thousands of individual cells. Therefore, researchers started developing wireless topologies suitable for transmitting information and control commands among sensors and controllers. Wireless BMS (WBMS) offers improved system reliability, lower weight and cost due to reduced wiring complexity, elimination of the requirement of galvanic isolations and physical connectors, especially for high capacity multicell battery packs [12]. WBMS also increases the flexibility of sensor placement inside the BMS and the placement of the BMS module itself inside the powertrain. The WBMS has high fault tolerance and adequate scalability when compared to conventional modularized BMS. Moreover, WBMS also enables the replacement of individual components without reconstructing the entire system. Few proposed architectures also employed memory units in each sensor node. Possessing in-node memory allows the system to recover data once the connection is restored after a temporary connection failure, resulting in enhanced data integrity and system reliability [13].
Researchers have already proposed different kinds of WBMS architecture and some of them have also demonstrated satisfactory performance in real-world application in the last few years. However, in general, the research on WBMS is still in its preliminary stage. Significant further research and development are required to achieve an industry-ready WBMS with optimum wire harness and weight, low cost, easy implementation, adequate data transfer rate, reliable and equipped with necessary functionalities. Therefore, realizing the promising prospects of WBMS in the LIB-powered systems, a detailed survey of existing WBMS architectures is presented in this article. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, an in-depth survey exclusively on WBMS has not yet been presented. The aim is to provide a complete summary of all recent and prominent developments, research trends and major challenges to provide a useful guideline to the research community for future developments, more so to enthuse them to provide more research efforts towards developing an industry-ready WBMS.
The remaining portion of the review article is organized as follows. Generic WBMS architecture is presented in Section 2 and the classification of WBMS is discussed in Section 3. Section 4 is the prime section of this review article as it provides a comprehensive survey of existing WBMS architectures reported in the literature. Section 5 summarizes the trends in WBMS research, current issues, challenges and future research scopes. Finally, concluding remarks are presented in Section 6.

2. Generic WBMS Architecture

The basic architecture of WBMS and traditional wired-BMS [14] are almost similar. All functionalities are also common in both the architectures. The only major difference is in the internal and external communication channels. Information from each cell such as voltage, current, and temperature is required for the estimation of different states and to realize the control and management action by the centralized master controller of the BMS. Now, in the case of WBMS, all these information exchanges among each sensor node, master controller, onboard display unit, data storage unit and other control and management unit are realized by a wireless communication channel instead of wired communication as in the case of wired BMS. Recently developed, cloud-based BMS also uses wireless internet communication for bi-directional communication between onboard BMS and cloud BMS. The schematic layout of a generic WBMS is depicted in Figure 1.

3. Classification of WBMS Topologies

WBMS as so far reported in the literature could be grouped based on the types of wireless communication channels employed by the researchers. Here, in this survey study, WBMSs are grouped into five distinct classes: namely, Bluetooth-based WBMS (BWBMS), Zigbee-based WBMS (ZWBMS), Wi-Fi-based WBMS (Wi-Fi-WBMS), Internet of Things (IoT)-based WBMS (IoT-WBMS) and Cloud-based WBMS (CWBMS). Besides all these wireless topologies, there are few other wireless communication technologies, such as Near Field Communication and Wi-Fi HaLow, that could be employed in WBMS. However, these are not yet successfully implemented in WBMS by researchers. Moreover, these are over-specified particularly for WBMS applications, leading to poor generalization and increased system cost [15]. There are few other studies that did not propose any WBMS topology directly; however, their findings are worth discussing for the overall progress of WBMS. All these relevant studies are discussed separately in Section 4.6. Figure 2 depicts the detailed classification of WBMS topologies.

4. Comprehensive Review of the Wireless BMS Topologies

4.1. Bluetooth-Based WBMS

The safe operating area of LIB is very narrow; therefore, crucial battery parameters such as voltage, current and temperature need to be closely monitored during the charging and discharging period. Traditional wired BMS controls the charging/discharging current based on the feedback received from the wired sensors at each cell to collect voltage and current data. The high-capacity LIB-pack consists of thousands of LIB cells; therefore, it requires several thousands of wire terminals to mount sensors on cells. Therefore, wired BMS is susceptible to physical connection failure. Moreover, rebuilding, modification and scaling are highly challenging due to physical connections. Repair, modification and scaling often require rebuilding the entire BMS and the battery pack. In search of solutions, Shell et al. [13] proposed a Bluetooth communication-based WBMS where wireless communication was used between cell sensors (voltage and current) and central controller instead of physical wired connections to minimize some of these challenges associated with the wired BMS. The scheme used a memory buffer in between the communication channel to enhance data integrity even if temporary failure of communication links. Despite its comparable performance with the wired BMS, the architecture could face the typical limitations of Bluetooth-based communication channels such as low data transfer rate, being prone to communication failure and low range. Further to this study, Bluetooth 4.0-based wireless sensors specially designed for WBMS were employed by Farmer et al. [16] to monitor temperature information in addition to the voltage and current data during the charging/discharging cycle of a high capacity battery pack. Moreover, a wireless strain gauge at each cell was used to follow individual battery swelling. Small Bluetooth receivers compatible with USB ports and a custom-made software tool were used for data logging and visualization. The scheme was practically implemented for a 2.5 kWh LIB-pack for NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory [16]. In both the schemes, the implemented WBMS used Bluetooth-based communication between each cell and central controller to collect battery parameters which are more of a battery monitoring system rather than a complete BMS.
Hardware implementation of BWBMS was demonstrated by Jamaluddin et al. [17]. Voltage, current and temperature data were measured by the respective sensor, then Arduino UNO microcontroller and Bluetooth communication channel were used to transmit battery information to a personal computer and mobile device for data visualization. The scheme is not suitable for large capacity battery packs with a large number of the individual cell and also encompasses typical limitations of Bluetooth-based communication. Chetan and Hiremath [18] demonstrated the effectiveness of WBMS in automatic health report generation through a simulation study. A practical hardware-based scheme needs to be developed and tested to assess the suitability of the scheme in a real-world application. Luo et al. [19] introduced a General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)-based online battery parameter monitoring scheme to determine important battery states, fault diagnosis and to facilitate data storage for future requirements such as SOH estimation. Although the GPRS communication protocol is still in use, currently, several advanced high-speed data communication standards have already been developed and extensively used for high speed and a large volume of data transmission. Moreover, the scheme is a battery monitoring system rather than a complete BMS. Following the above discussion, it could be highlighted that BWBMS is suitable for low-capacity LIB-packs and low-cost solutions. The power consumption of Bluetooth communication is very low, making it suitable for the battery-powered system. However, Bluetooth communication is not adequate for the BMS of large capacity LIB pack as it requires high volume and high-speed data transfer to ensure safe and reliable battery management.

4.2. Zigbee-Based WBMS

The Zigbee (IEEE 802.15.4)-based battery parameter monitoring scheme was introduced by Wu et al. [20]. Individual voltage and temperature sensors along with a Zigbee module were attached to each cell to measure voltage and temperature information, thereafter sensing the data to a battery management unit (BMU) for data acquisition, analyzing and displaying the statistics. In this topology, wireless communication was only used between individual cells and BMU. CAN-bus was still employed for communication between BMU and vehicle controller for information and command transmission. Therefore, the reduction in wire mesh was minimum. Further to this study, a complete wireless communication scheme was employed by Otto et al. [21]. The electromagnetic interference (EMI) has been reduced by several extents by eliminating the physical wires. However, the scheme suffers from similar drawbacks as in ref. [20]. Schneider et al. [22] suggested that a wireless Ultra High Frequency (UHF) sensor with an active downlink could be implemented for transmitting individual cell voltage, current information to the central battery control (CBC) unit wirelessly for estimating SOC and SOH. The primary intention of the study was to propose a wireless sensor based on the IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol. They have also demonstrated that the battery electronic control unit (ECU) could be used to send addressed commands and multicast/broadcast commands to the sensors for monitoring and control of signal flow. The few major limitations include the high cost of implementation and micro-electronic implementation of such a sensor, especially for high current and voltage application, being challenging, which need further research. Furthermore, the scheme was tested for lead–acid batteries; therefore, it needs to be tested for other popular batteries such as LIBs. Further, Mathew et al. [23] proposed an IEEE 802.15.4 protocol-based wireless communication architecture for monitoring LIB cells. The condition of a group of cells based on sensor data is communicated through a bidirectional wireless communication channel (2.4 GHz) to a local controller termed a Base Controller Module (BCM). Radio frequency (RF)-modem with antenna was used for wireless communication. Furthermore, fault conditions from BCM to the main Electronic Control Unit (ECU) were communicated through CAN-bus communication. Therefore, wiring requirement is still significant due to the partial use of CAN-bus communication.
Rahman et al. [24] developed a cost-effective WBMS employing the Zigbee communication protocol and point-to-point wireless topology. The BMS was primarily developed for thermal management of a LIB pack with a large number of series and parallelly connected LIB cells. The wireless communication was mainly used for transmitting voltage, current, temperature and SOC information to the central processor and display unit. The scheme was highly effective in reducing massive wiring issues. However, a major focus was given on the double-tier switched-capacitor converter and resonant switched-capacitor converter-based cell balancing and thermal management schemes. The proposed WBMS demonstrated enhanced performance in cell balancing; however, no satisfactory results were shown in the thermal management of LIB cells. Despite the low cost, low power and easy to implement communication protocol, there are several limitations of Zigbee-based communication especially for highly sophisticated and large LIB packs from a safety and reliability point of view. In addition, limited data transfer rate and low-security issues are also some of the major limitations. IEEE 802.15.4 is suitable for low data rate application, advanced BMS requires very high-resolution data for better safety, operational control and management. Moreover, none of the studies covered an in-depth discussion on Zigbee-based WBMS. Most of the studies provided an overview that is not sufficient for real-world implementation and further development.

4.3. Wi-Fi-Based WBMS

The conventional distinct architecture of EV power train uses separate modules for BMS and charger controller resulting in hardware complexity, larger size and eventually, high implementation cost. Moreover, poor generalization and scalability issues are also very prominent. To reduce the dependence on discrete specialized components, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), a generalized hybrid system, was used by Gherman et al. [25] to develop a single chip for WBMS and charge controller for EVs. The proposed system used Wi-Fi as a wireless communication channel. The WBMS is capable to estimate SOC based on the measured battery parameters and facilitate SOC-based cell balancing both during the charging and discharging period. FPGA can facilitate both software and hardware updates without replacing the existing PCB. Despite the scheme having a dual-core processor, it has limited capability to handle a large volume of data. Thus, its application in state predictions that require a large volume of historical data such as SOH are challenging. Moreover, using a single chip for BMS and charge controller limits its application for large capacity LIB packs due to voltage and current handling limitations. The topology proposed by Gherman et al. [25] uses a Cell Sensor Unit (CSU) that measures and transmits measured parameters from each cell to BMS. One Wi-Fi module is installed on each CSU, making the topology practically challenging especially for a large capacity LIB pack having thousands of individual cells.
WBMS for the smart cell was proposed by Huang et al. [26]. A smart cell consists of a LIB cell, a cell bypass device and a slave controller. All such smart cells are controlled by a master controller termed a smart battery management system (SBMS). The primary intention was to develop a cell balancing scheme based on cell SOC and SOH where each slave associated with each cell was responsible for measuring cell voltage, current and temperature to estimate SOC and SOH. Finally, transmit this information to the master controller, that is, SBMS over a wireless Wi-Fi channel to control the cell balancing operation. SBMS also transmits the command signal to each slave over the same wireless channel. This scheme not only improved the fault tolerance by reducing the exclusive dependence on the master controller employing individual slave controllers at each cell but at the same time reduced the clutter caused by communication wires, thereby reducing the size and weight of the system. The study mainly focused on cell balancing, with no significant contribution to the wireless data collection and control part of BMS. Despite the promising performance, using smart cells in a high capacity LIB pack is impractical from a system cost and manufacturing complexity point of view. One of the major advantages of the WBMS based cell balancing is the ease of scalability due to reduced new wiring requirements.

4.4. Internet of Things (IoT)-Based WBMS

Friansa et al. [27] proposed an IoT-based battery monitoring system for stationary battery energy storage system (BESS) used in microgrid systems. The centralized master-module-based BMS suffers from reliability issues due to the engagement of a single master BMS. Failure of communication between individual cell control module, sensors and master-module results in malfunctioning of BMS and even catastrophic failure of the battery system. Therefore, Faika et al. [28] proposed an IoT-based dispersed and decentralized WBMS for reliable battery management. The IoT-WBMS network incorporated a message queuing telemetry transport (MQTT) protocol. The effective leader election algorithm, MQTT and cloud support provided a dispersed, scalable, reliable and cost-effective WBMS solution with powerful computation and reduced transmission power losses and interferences. Prime advantages of WBMS supported by IoT and cloud/edge computing technologies includes powerful computing and unlimited cloud support that results in rapid development, extended scalability and greater visibility. However, the employment of a cyber-physical system leads to cyber-attack, as the system is always connected to the network. Moreover, it also increases the implementation and maintenance cost. Therefore, Faika et al. extended their study presented in ref. [28] to develop a cloud-supported IoT-enabled WBMS [29]. The intention was to enhance the communication and data security of an IoT-enabled WBMS from malicious cyber-attacks by integrating blockchain technology. The security-enhanced WBMS was employed to develop a real-time health monitoring system for LIB cell and pack as well. The blockchain-IoT enabled BMS network can use a private channel with access control to facilitate module-to-module communication as well as communication with the external devices for decentralized BMS control securely. The system also utilizes cloud storage and secure data exchange primarily for the real-time health monitoring. The leader election algorithm was tolerant to the failure of either the wireless nodes or the controllers in the WMMSs that eventually enhanced the reliability of BMS compared to single centralized master-based BMS architecture. The practical feasibility of the scheme was also demonstrated by the authors by developing a prototype using five Raspberry pi, three IoT boards and a smart contract with the help of the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain platform [30]. The study provided only an overview and technologies available for developing cloud supported blockchain-IoT enabled BMS. In-depth technical details and the mechanism behind the blockchain-based scheme to improve the security of BMS are missing. The cyber security of the cyber-physical WBMS was also not covered in these studies.

4.5. Cloud-Based WBMS

A cloud-based battery monitoring and information management scheme for EVs was proposed by Tanizawa et al. [31]. Kim et al. [32] introduced the CWBMS for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for large-scale stationary BESS. The existing studies lack in providing the technical details of both software and hardware design for the CWBMS. Moreover, the performance and functionalities of the system have not been tested and validated with real-world operational data. Advanced functionalities of BMS, such as ageing prognostics and strategy optimization, are highly dependent on the longtime historical data. Therefore, incorporating these functionalities in onboard BMS with low computational power is not feasible. Therefore, to enhance the computational power and data storage of BMS, Li et al. [33] presented a CWBMS that uses IoT for transmitting all relevant data from battery packs to the cloud platform. A digital twin of the LIB system was developed on the cloud platform that uses measured data and the equivalent circuit model of battery for SOC and SOH estimation powered by an adaptive extended H-infinity filter and particle swarm optimization, respectively. Compared to the on-board BMS, digital-twin-based WBMS facilitates continuous and accurate monitoring of parameters, online state estimation, fault prognosis/diagnosis. Despite the performance of the scheme being experimentally validated by developing a prototype, the primary impression of the paper was on SOC and SOH estimation. While an overview of the WBMS was presented, the basic topology was still IoT-based; no such improvement in topology or protocol was reported.

4.6. Other Relevant Studies on WBMS

Irrespective of types of WBMS, establishing an effective communication channel for wireless data transmission inside the battery pack is a prime challenge; while at the same time, the existing wireless topology for BMS, such as IEEE 802.15.4 in the 2.4 GHz band, suffers from low data transfer speed (maximum 250 kbps). Therefore, Alonso et al. [34] conducted a study focusing on the wireless channel properties inside the battery pack, and the data rates. They have analyzed and measured the transmission capabilities of several antenna types and frequency ranges to provide a guideline for selecting a suitable antenna for data transmission inside a battery pack. They have also demonstrated that PIFA (Planar Inverted-F- Antenna) having the frequency band 2200 MHz–2600 MHz can have a data transfer rate of up to 2 Mbps, which is twice compared to CAN-bus communication. The results obtained by the authors were based on the simulation study; no real battery-based test was conducted in [34]. Therefore, the authors extended their research by developing a prototype of the communication system, particularly for the physical and MAC layers. They have implemented the master and the slave nodes of the communication network with software-defined radio (SDR) platforms. Differential encoding (DQPSK) modulation and Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) protocols were used by them for the physical layer and MAC layer, respectively. Despite an effort towards developing a communication protocol for WBMS, the proposed platform produces an inaccurate result in battery tag position propagation and the TDMA protocol was inappropriate in handling noise in the measured signals.
Lee et al. [12] developed a WBMS architecture using energy-autonomous micro-sensors mounted on each battery cell, and a master module for centralized data processing. A Proprietary Wireless Battery Area Network (WiBaANTM) protocol that uses a 900 MHz unlicensed frequency band (ISM) was used for wireless data communication inside the BMS. Although the architecture can provide better scalability, data transfer rate, perfect isolation of high voltage and eliminate wired connection failure due to the harshly vibratory operating environment of EVs, the proprietary communication protocol can accommodate only 780 numbers battery cells under the condition of a 100 ms data update rate. Moreover, centralized data processing leads to reliability issues due to the failure of a single master processor. Installing one slave BMS consisting of one build-in current sensor, voltage sensor, temperature sensor and flash memory not only complicates the integration but also increases the scalability issue and cost of implementation. In addition, replacing each faulty cell with a new one is challenging as it requires several parameter matchings. Although, Kumtachi et al. [35] has not proposed a WBMS scheme directly, however, they have developed an enhanced reliable multi-hop wireless communication protocol for EVs. According to the protocol, the system sends overheard packets without selecting the most suitable route to reduce communication latency. The performance was evaluated by computer simulation. It could be used for future generation smart fast-acting WBMS with a high degree of reliability. Wang et al. [36] developed a very basic charging control scheme using a microcontroller, where wireless communication was only used for battery status monitoring. The charging current was controlled by varying the PWM using an ATMega32 microcontroller. Wireless topologies used in this scheme were not mentioned in the article.
With the increasing application of cyber-physical BMS, the cybersecurity aspect of BMS has become highly important. The hardware and cybersecurity of BMS have long been overlooked; however, these may lead to a catastrophic disaster. While several commercial solutions are available, they do not provide a scalable solution and typically can accommodate only very few numbers of cells. Moreover, a physical contact-based security scheme requires extra wiring, resulting in additional design and manufacturing complexity and cost for battery packs with a large number of cells. Therefore, Al Khas and Cicek [37] designed and demonstrated a wireless cell authentication and remote health monitoring scheme. A low-power CMOS-RF integrated circuit was combined with cryptographic IP cores and low power synthesizable soft CPUs to form an integrated circuit and was attached to each cell and a Secure Hash Algorithm 2 (SHA-512) based wireless authentication scheme for use in remote monitoring of a battery pack. They have also demonstrated the effectiveness of the scheme by developing a hardware prototype using FPGA devices where a Wi-Fi module was employed to emulate wireless communication. Linear Technology (LT) [38] developed an industry-first WBMS using a smart mesh embedded wireless network for EVs. In the mesh network topology, all nodes are interconnected to each other through a wireless channel and each node can send or receive data to and from the master node. However, such a centralized BMS network leads to an extra burden on the master node resulting in communication latency and sometimes connection failure. Failure of the single leader node eventually leads to the failure of the entire system and may even lead to catastrophic failure and accidents. Recently, research on smart cell and battery is getting momentum. Smart cell integrates multi-dimensional sensing and self-healing functions into each single cell. Then, the sensor data can be transmitted to BMS through a wireless channel or through wired connections. Regarding this, a detailed discussion on smart cell and battery management system was presented by Wei et al. [39] through a review study.

5. Trends, Challenges and Future Research Scopes

The literature survey revealed that an assortment of WBMS topologies have been reported over the last decade. The research trends based on the number of publications per year and based on wireless communication topology employed over the last decade are shown in Figure 3.
It can be noticed from Figure 3 that a variety of WBMS topologies have been reported in the literature. However, in general, a very limited number of efforts have been made so far. From Figure 3b, it can be inferred that Bluetooth and Zigbee communication technologies were mostly employed for WBMS by researchers. An in-depth literature survey also indicated that the initial trend was to develop BWBMS followed by ZWBMS. Recently, IoT and Wi-Fi communication-based WBMS were implemented due to the stringent requirement of accuracy, communication reliability and overall system safety especially for high capacity LIB packs. Moreover, concern for information security further motivated to develop IoT-WBMS and Wi-Fi-WBMS. Close monitoring of battery performance necessitates mounting high-resolution sensors, and IoT and Wi-Fi-based communication architecture enable high speed and high volume of data transmission. Further, storing and analyzing a high volume of data in real-time by onboard BMS with limited processing power and storage capacity became highly challenging. Therefore, CWBMS was introduced, enabled by IoT and Wi-Fi communication for real-time data processing, decision making and storage of large volume of data. Historical data over a long timeframe is extremely essential for SOH, RUL prediction and prognosis of slowly developing battery faults, especially. In continuation with the previous judgement, despite considerable progress having been made in the WBMS research, the efforts are very limited and developments are still at a very basic level.
It has been stated by most of the research studies that WBMS is highly effective in reducing the massive wire harness, weight, physical connection failure rate; however, practical demonstration and quantification with the real-world data have not yet been highlighted by any study. Effective BMS operation requires detailed information of each cell in a battery pack that demands installing sensors for every individual parameter such as voltage, current, the temperature of each cell. Now, mounting sensors with each cell of a high capacity LIB-pack having thousands of individual cells is highly challenging in terms of space, cost and manufacturing point of view. Information security issues of internet-connected BMS architectures are also been a prime concern recently. Few efforts have been made; however, their suitability in a real-world application has not yet been assessed. Significant further research is recommended here. Although CWBMS are highly suitable for real-time data processing and large-volume of data storage, the maintenance cost of CWBMS is very high. Moreover, maintaining consistent internet connectivity among vehicles and CWBMS is also highly difficult. So far, WBMS is mostly implemented for monitoring battery parameters such as voltage, current, temperature, other BMS operations such as controlling and managing cell balancing, fault diagnosis/detection are not leveraging the advantages of wireless communication. In summary, significant further research and development are recommended towards developing an industry-ready WBMS architecture. Another prime constrain is interference from other nearby wireless networks. It not only produces noise but also leads to connection interruption, delay in connection and transmission delay. In addition, implementing an optimum solution to isolate each system from the other and that, too, in a cost-effective manner is also challenging. Therefore, further research attention is required here.

6. Conclusions

This study presented an in-depth literature survey of the wireless battery management system (WBMS) topologies realizing the promising future of WBMS over the traditional wired-BMS. WBMS are not only capable of minimizing the massive wiring harness, space requirement and physical connection failure but at the same eliminating complicated rewiring for each new car and rewiring during failure of a single cell. Thereby, WBMS can enhance the scalability of a battery pack with little additional investment. Despite an assortment of WBMS topologies having been reported over the last decade, overall, very few efforts on WBMS have been made. Moreover, developments are at their primary stage and therefore, significant further research and development are required to obtain an industry-ready WBMS architecture. With the increasing stringent requirement of safety, reliability and the accuracy of information, several sensors and wireless communication modules need to be installed on each cell. Any high capacity battery pack consists of thousands of individual cells; therefore, mounting sensors and wireless communication module on each cell results in a high implementation cost. Moreover, managing wireless communication among different nodes becomes challenging. Another prime constraint of WBMS is the interference from other nearby wireless networks. It not only produces noise but also leads to connection interruption, delay in connection and transmission delay. In addition, implementing an optimum solution to isolate each system from the other and that, too, in a cost-effective manner is also challenging. Therefore, further research attention is required here.
Bluetooth-based and Zigbee-based WBMS are suitable for battery application due to low self-power consumption and low implementation cost. However, their data transfer rate, connection reliability, information security are not adequate for real-world application. Wi-Fi and IoT-based WBMS have high reliability and security; however, their implementation cost is high. Some custom-made Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi HaLow appear to be a suitable solution for WBMS applications. However, the over-specified design for WBMS applications results in an increased cost overhead. Application of cloud-BMS (CWBMS) for real-time data processing, decision making powered by high-speed communication through IoT and Wi-Fi eventually enhanced the processing power and data storage capacity and flexibility of BMS construction to a significant extent. However, the cost of maintenance is very high and it requires a reliable and high-quality communication channel. Therefore, as of now, the practical feasibility of CWBMS requires further development and cost reduction. Furthermore, the cybersecurity aspect of the cyber-physical BMS has not yet been seriously considered. However, it is of paramount importance to consider the information security and privacy aspects. Finally, it could be concluded that the promising feature of WBMS will play a crucial role in the rapid development and enhanced performance of BMS, especially for a high-capacity lithium-ion battery pack. This survey study provided a detailed guideline by highlighting the summary of existing developments, emerging trends, current issues and challenges to the researchers for future developments. Presumably, this survey study will also motivate the research community towards putting more research efforts on WBMS to uplift the progress and widespread adoption of electric vehicles and other LIB-powered systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and S.S.W.; methodology, S.S.W.; investigation, A.S.; resources, S.S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S.W.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, S.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Luo, X.; Kang, L.; Lu, C.; Linghu, J.; Lin, H.; Hu, B. An enhanced multicell-to-multicell battery equalizer based on bipolar-resonant LC converter. Electronics 2021, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xing, Y.; Ma, E.W.M.; Tsui, K.L.; Pecht, M. Battery management systems in electric and hybrid vehicles. Energies 2011, 4, 1840–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gabbar, H.A.; Othman, A.M.; Abdussami, M.R. Review of battery management systems (BMS) development and industrial standards. Technologies 2021, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ko, Y.; Choi, W. A new soc estimation for lfp batteries: Application in a 10 ah cell (hw 38120 l/s) as a hysteresis case study. Electronics 2021, 10, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, P.; Li, J.; Sun, C.; Yang, G.; Sun, F. Adaptive state-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries by considering capacity degradation. Electronics 2021, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sung, W.; Lee, J. Implementation of SOH estimator in automotive BMSs using recursive least-squares. Electronics 2019, 8, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jiang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, N. State of health estimation of second-life LiFePO4 batteries for energy storage applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Samanta, A.; Williamson, S.S. A comprehensive review of lithium-ion cell temperature estimation techniques applicable to health-conscious fast charging and smart battery management systems. Preprints 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Samanta, A.; Chowdhuri, S. Active cell balancing of lithium-ion battery pack using dual DC-DC converter and auxiliary lead-acid battery. J. Energy Storage 2021, 33, 102109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samanta, A.; Chowdhuri, S.; Williamson, S.S. Machine learning-based data-driven fault detection/diagnosis of lithium-ion battery: A critical review. Electronics 2021, 10, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karimi, G.; Li, X. Thermal management of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Int. J. Energy Res. 2013, 37, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, M.; Lee, J.; Lee, I.; Lee, J.; Chon, A. Wireless battery management system. In Proceedings of the 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 17–20 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shell, C.; Henderson, J.; Verra, H.; Dyer, J. Implementation of a wireless battery management system (WBMS). In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Pisa, Italy, 11–14 May 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, M.U.; Zafar, A.; Nengroo, S.H.; Hussain, S.; Alvi, M.J.; Kim, H.J. Towards a smarter battery management system for electric vehicle applications: A critical review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation. Energies 2019, 12, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bansal, P.; Pr, N. Wireless battery management system for electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference, Novi, MI, USA, 19 June–21 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Farmer, J.; Chang, J.; Zumstein, J.; Kotovsky, J.; Dobley, A.; Puglia, F.; Osswald, S.; Wolf, K.; Kaschmitter, J.; Eaves, S.; et al. Wireless Battery Management System for Safe, High-Capacity Energy Storage for Electric Vehicles and the Grid; Lawrence Livermore National Lab: Livermore, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 729–734. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jamaluddin, A.; Perdana, F.A.; Supriyanto, A.; Purwanto, A.; Inayati; Nizam, M. Development of wireless battery monitoring for electric vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Denpasar, Indonesia, 24–25 November 2014; Volume 328, pp. 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chetan, M.; Hiremath, M.S. Validation of wireless battery management system (wBMS)—Gen2. J. Univ. Shanghai Sci. Technol. 2021, 23, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, M.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, W.M.; Wang, Z. Online battery monitoring system based on GPRS for electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, Hangzhou, China, 26–27 August 2013; Volume 1, pp. 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Y.; Liao, X.; Chen, W.; Chen, D. A battery management system for electric vehicle based on Zigbee and CAN. In Proceedings of the 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Shanghai, China, 15–17 October 2011; Volume 5, pp. 2517–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Otto, A.; Rzepka, S.; Mager, T.; Michel, B.; Lanciotti, C.; Günther, T.; Kanoun, O. Battery management network for fully electrical vehicles featuring smart systems at cell and pack level. In Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2012; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schneider, M.; Ilgin, S.; Jegenhorst, N.; Kube, R.; Püttjer, S.; Riemschneider, K.R.; Vollmer, J. Automotive battery monitoring by wireless cell sensors. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, Graz, Austria, 13–16 May 2012; pp. 816–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mathew, S.A.; Prakash, R.; John, P.C. A smart wireless battery monitoring system for electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2012 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Kochi, India, 27–29 November 2012; pp. 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rahman, A.; Rahman, M.; Rashid, M. Wireless battery management system of electric transport. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gherman, T.; Teodorescu, R.; Ricco, M.; Petreus, D.; Meng, J. Smart integrated charger with wireless BMS for EVs. In Proceedings of the IECON 2018-44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Washington, DC, USA, 21–23 October 2018; Volume 1, pp. 2151–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, X.; Acharya, A.B.; Meng, J.; Sui, X.; Stroe, D.I.; Teodorescu, R. Wireless smart battery management system for electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10–14 October 2020; pp. 5620–5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Friansa, K.; Haq, I.N.; Santi, B.M.; Kurniadi, D.; Leksono, E.; Yuliarto, B. Development of battery monitoring system in smart microgrid based on Internet of Things (IoT). Procedia Eng. 2017, 170, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Faika, T.; Kim, T.; Khan, M. An Internet of Things (IoT)-based network for dispersed and decentralized wireless battery management systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Long Beach, CA, USA, 13–15 June 2018; pp. 1060–1064. [Google Scholar]
  29. Faika, T.; Kim, T.; Ochoa, J.; Khan, M.; Park, S.W.; Leung, C.S. A blockchain-based Internet of Things (IoT) network for security-enhanced wireless battery management systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 September–3 October 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Foschini, L.; Gavagna, A.; Martuscelli, G.; Montanari, R. Hyperledger fabric blockchain: Chaincode performance analysis. In Proceedings of the ICC 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tanizawa, T.; Suzumiya, T.; Ikeda, K. Cloud-connected battery management system supporting e-mobility. Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J. 2015, 51, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, T.; Makwana, D.; Adhikaree, A.; Vagdoda, J.S.; Lee, Y. Cloud-based battery condition monitoring and fault diagnosis platform for large-scale lithium-ion battery energy storage systems. Energies 2018, 11, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, W.; Rentemeister, M.; Badeda, J.; Jöst, D.; Schulte, D.; Sauer, D.U. Digital twin for battery systems: Cloud battery management system with online state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation. J. Energy Storage 2020, 30, 101557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alonso, D.; Opalko, O.; Sigle, M.; Dostert, K. Towards a wireless battery management system: Evaluation of antennas and radio channel measurements inside a battery emulator. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14–17 September 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumtachi, T.; Kinoshita, K.; Watanabe, T. Reliable wireless communications in battery management system of electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2017 Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Network (ICMU), Toyama, Japan, 3–5 October 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, C.W.; Lu, L.J.; Chi, Z.X.; You, J.L. A novel structural design of wireless lithium-ion battery management system (BMS) by using pulse width modulation method for charging and discharging. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advanced Materials for Science and Engineering, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 26–27 June 2016; pp. 204–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al Khas, A.; Cicek, I. SHA-512 based wireless authentication scheme for smart battery management systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications, Brasov, Romania, 3–6 November 2019; pp. 968–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zimmer, G. Wireless Battery Management Systems Highlight Industry’s Drive for Higher Reliability; Analog Devices Inc.: Norwood, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wei, Z.; Zhao, J.; He, H.; Ding, G.; Cui, H.; Liu, L. Future smart battery and management: Advanced sensing from external to embedded multi-dimensional measurement. J. Power Sources 2021, 489, 229462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic layout of a generic WBMS.
Figure 1. Schematic layout of a generic WBMS.
Electronics 10 02193 g001
Figure 2. Classification of WBMS topologies.
Figure 2. Classification of WBMS topologies.
Electronics 10 02193 g002
Figure 3. Trends of WBMS research: (a) Based on the number of publications per year, (b) Based on wireless communication topology employed.
Figure 3. Trends of WBMS research: (a) Based on the number of publications per year, (b) Based on wireless communication topology employed.
Electronics 10 02193 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samanta, A.; Williamson, S.S. A Survey of Wireless Battery Management System: Topology, Emerging Trends, and Challenges. Electronics 2021, 10, 2193.

AMA Style

Samanta A, Williamson SS. A Survey of Wireless Battery Management System: Topology, Emerging Trends, and Challenges. Electronics. 2021; 10(18):2193.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samanta, Akash, and Sheldon S. Williamson. 2021. "A Survey of Wireless Battery Management System: Topology, Emerging Trends, and Challenges" Electronics 10, no. 18: 2193.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop