Next Article in Journal
A Review of Moisturizers; History, Preparation, Characterization and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Structure on the Solubility of UV Filters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cosmetics
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/cosmetics9030059
cosmetics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Preservatives and Multifunctionals on the Oxidation of Cosmetic O/W Emulsions

by
Arielle Springer
* and
Helena Ziegler
Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Straße 35, D-85354 Freising, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2022, 9(3), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9030059
Submission received: 3 May 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 31 May 2022 / Published: 7 June 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preservatives are typically used to protect cosmetic products from microbial spoilage. However, there is evidence that some preservatives can increase oxidation in O/W emulsions. This could have disadvantages for product quality, efficacy, and consumer health and well-being. Therefore, the impact of preservatives or multifunctionals on oxidation should be quantified. For this purpose, five O/W emulsions with different preservatives were prepared and stored. During storage, the oxygen concentration in the headspace of the samples was studied. The samples showed significant differences in their oxygen uptake and daily oxygen consumption rate. Thus, the preservatives used in this study had an influence on oxidation.

1. Introduction

In recent years, synthetic preservatives such as parabens have fallen strongly into disrepute and have been dismissed by many consumers [1]. This is one possible factor for the steadily increasing demand for natural cosmetic products [2]. Although the type and concentration of preservatives are severely limited in natural cosmetic products, even in them substances have to be used to protect the products and consumers, especially in O/W emulsions.
O/W emulsions are dispersed systems composed of an outer water phase and a dispersed oil phase with emollients responsible for tactile perception and skin efficacy [3,4]. To prevent the separation of these non-mixable components, amphiphilic surface-active molecules—emulsifiers—are required [5]. An O/W emulsion is characterized by being water-soluble, cooling, and not oily. Despite the fact that emulsions are prone to flocculation, coalescence, or separation of the phases during storage [6,7], their quality can also be limited by the growth of microorganisms in the large water phase [8]. For example, bacteria, yeasts, and molds can enter the product after opening the packaging through contact with the finger, as well as exposure to air. Therefore, preservatives are used to prevent the growth of microorganisms [9]. In general, a preservative should have a broad spectrum of activity, sufficient solubility in water, and a pH-independent spectrum of activity, and should not interact with other ingredients [10]. Table 1 shows some selected natural preservatives, their respective pH range of action, water solubility, preservation spectrum, and the maximum permissible amount that may be used in the preparation of the various O/W-emulsion-based cosmetic formulations.
While preservatives protect cosmetic products microbially, the bulk can still degrade due to oxidation. Oxidative changes in the lipid phase are mostly due to autoxidation processes of natural emollients. Like in most vegetable oils, these reactions are responsible for the formation of hydroperoxides and later carbonyl compounds, whereby the last mentioned can lead to a rancid off-flavor [17,18]. In particular, lipid hydroperoxides react with pro-oxidants from the aqueous phase to form radicals at the interface of the micelles, which subsequently trigger the oxidation of fatty acids inside the micelle [19]. The process of autoxidation is influenced by various factors, such as temperature, the composition of fatty acids, concentration and effectiveness of pro- and antioxidants, oxygen partial pressure, oxidation catalysts, such as heavy metal ions (e.g., copper, iron) and the redox-state [20]. The activity of the antioxidants decreases with lower the pH level, due to increased stability and solubility of the reduced transition metals responsible for pro-oxidant effects [21]. Some ingredients, such as citric acid, can form complexes with metal ions to prevent compounds from reacting with metals and forming peroxides [22], but others can even promote oxidation, as described for ascorbic acid [21]. It was already shown that the oxidation rate in O/W emulsions increases with the increasing content of unsaturated fatty acids [23]. However, the prediction of oxidation reactions in emulsions is not trivial due to numerous influencing factors, such as droplet size, interfaces, and oxidation kinetics [24]. During oxidation, degradation of the oxidation-sensitive unsaturated fatty acids occurs, which are known for their positive effect on the skin such as anti-inflammatory effect [25] or effect against atopic dermatitis [26,27]. The resulting oxidation products and free radicals have been shown to accelerate skin aging [28] and lead to skin damage [29,30]. The topical application of such oxidation products can damage the skin, especially the skin lubricant squalene [31,32]. Some food preservatives themselves tend to degrade tissues in the body faster than they rebuild and, therefore, can interfere with metabolism [33], which may be also possible for cosmetic preservatives and their effect on the skin. Besides natural oils and unsaturated fatty acids, also certain ingredients are sensitive to oxidation and can lose their effect during storage, such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C) [34], retinol (vitamin A1) [35], and ubiquinone (coenzyme Q10) [36]. Even if preservatives are not as much in the focus of the literature yet, there is evidence that some preservatives, while improving microbiological shelf life, can lead to altered oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in the emulsion as well. In the following, five preservatives were examined in more detail: Phenethyl alcohol is a rose-scented substance that acts as a multifunctional on the one hand as a fragrance, but also as a fungicidal and bacteriostatic agent by inhibiting enzymes in bacteria and fungi [37,38]. It is photosensitive and can be synthetically oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde and further to acid [39]. This process has been described in organic synthesis in systems with two phases (organic and aqueous) [40], which suggests that it can be applied to O/W emulsions as well. Sorbic acid or its salts (sorbates) are currently used as an antimicrobial agent to prevent spoilage by mold, yeast, and fungi by interfering with various metabolic processes in the cell life cycle. Sorbic acid has a very high partition coefficient in the water phase, reaching microorganisms very well. However, it is oxidatively unstable in aqueous solutions depending on pH, the presence of other additives, and storage conditions [41,42]. As a result of this degradation, carbonyl compounds are formed, which can lead to undesirable changes in quality and acceptability [43]. A plausible reason would be that the unsaturated carbon bonds are able to bind oxygen. Sorbic acid showed a significant pro-oxidant effect in foods [44,45]. These processes are probably also transferable to cosmetic O/W emulsions. Ethanol has a very good preservative effect with a broad pH action spectrum, which is due to its non-specific protein denaturation effect against all types of microorganisms [9]. Ethanol is able to oxidize to acetaldehyde and acetic acid [46]. However, this process has little relevance for cosmetic emulsions. Furthermore, there are data that exclude an influence on fat oxidation in oils [47]. Benzyl alcohol has a pleasant fragrance and is frequently used as a preservative [48,49]. However, it is oxidatively unstable. The substance oxidizes in the presence of oxygen in an aqueous solution to benzaldehyde and further to benzoic acid, which acts against microorganisms [50,51]. Its bacteriostatic and fungistatic activity is based on the inhibitory effect on enzymes that degrade reactive oxygen species [52]. Benzoin derivatives can be problematic because they can react to carcinogenic benzene in the presence of hydroxyl radicals (e.g., from fat oxidation) and light [53,54]. Since these processes have already been described in foods [55], they are certainly also realistic in cosmetic emulsions. Glyceryl caprylate is known as multifunctional and acts as a natural preservative, but also as an emollient, emulsifier, and skin penetration enhancer [56,57]. The substance has a good effect on numerous bacteria, yeasts, and molds [58,59]. No evidence of pro-oxidant behavior could be found. This is due to the chemical structure, which does not contain any unsaturated bonds or free functional groups that preferentially undergo radical or oxidative reactions. This can also be assumed for emulsions. These data suggest an influence of preservatives and multifunctionals on the oxidation of emulsions. However, according to the knowledge of the authors, no study was found in the literature that systematically describes the effect of preservatives on the oxidation of emulsions. Therefore, there is a need to elaborate on this aspect with a comparable and reproducible experimental approach.
For that reason, the aim of the study was to determine the role of these substances on the oxygen uptake and daily oxygen consumption rate of cosmetic formulations. For this purpose, O/W emulsions were chosen as matrices for incorporating the substances and measuring oxidation. These results can help to select preservatives and multifunctionals that avoid pro-oxidant effects in the future so that oxidation and its negative consequences on the quality in terms of efficacy of the products, skin health, and consumer acceptance and well-being can be prevented.

2. Materials and Methods

To verify this effect, five formulations were prepared with the following natural preservatives: phenethyl alcohol, potassium sorbate, ethanol, benzyl alcohol, and glyceryl caprylate. It was not possible to prepare a blank value without preservatives, since the microbiological activity would have influenced the oxygen concentration in the headspace and prevented conclusions about oxidation. A method to sterilize the samples without significantly altering them, and thus, risking comparability was not known. For every preservative, one formulation was produced. The following ingredients were used: canola oil as emollient, glyceryl stearate SE as O/W emulsifier, xanthan gum as a stabilizer, pH regulator, and preservative. Double-distilled water was added to fill the difference to 100% since it was assumed, that the preservatives accumulate in the water phase due to their polar solubility and antimicrobial effect in the aqueous phase. The process involved suspending the thickener and emulsifier in the lipid phase and then homogenizing with the water phase heated to 80 °C at 17,000 rpm for one minute. After cooling while stirring, the pH was adjusted to 4.3, and the preservative was added by homogenizing at 17,000 rpm for one minute. Table 2 shows the formulations in detail.
The samples were filled into vials with oxygen sensors as triplicate determinations and evacuated to 300 mbar for 30 s to remove air bubbles from the sample caused by the filling process. Next, the samples were sealed gas-tight. All these steps were performed in a sterile bank and allowed the most hygienic production possible. Subsequently, the products were stored for 96 days under accelerated conditions at 30 °C and commercial lightning (1000 lux, halogen, 6000 K). Light exposure was chosen since it leads to a higher oxygen uptake [60]. Since cosmetic products are, these conditions are transferable to practice. Cosmetic formulations are often developed for a storage period of 30 months, during which they are stored under illumination in the retail trade during the day in an often light-transmitting packaging. Therefore, using the Arrhenius equation, the storage chosen in this study might represent the first 5–6 months after production. Physical stability was assessed visually during the storage period, as previous rheological studies during product development and the recommendations of the ingredient manufacturers have shown stable formulations. The antimicrobial efficacy of preservatives in the used concentration ranges has already been approved by the ingredient manufacturers as well. These results could be applied to these applications. Microbial analysis was performed at the beginning of the storage. Individual microbiological challenge tests were not necessary here, since no additional microbial contamination or growth was expected due to the closed storage. After storage, all vials were analyzed using headspace gas analysis on their CO2 concentration as a marker for microbial activity [61]. The experimental measurement of the oxygen partial pressure of the headspace was carried out via chemical–optical sensors according to the literature [62,63]. The oxygen concentration in mbar in every vial with a defined weight of product was converted to the amount of oxygen in mg taken up by 100 g of product (oxygen uptake) and shown as a function of time for all developed formulations to visualize the oxygen sensitivity. Subsequently, the slope of the oxygen uptake over time was calculated into the oxygen intake in mg per 100 g of product per day of storage (oxygen consumption rate) and is shown as a bar chart as an indicator of the oxidation kinetics [64]. The experimental setup is shown in the following scheme (Figure 1).

3. Results and Discussion

The rheological quality at the beginning of the measurement was stable and showed a glossy surface and smooth flow behavior of medium viscosity. It can be assumed that the matrix behaved in the same way for all variants since no visual change in stability was observed in terms of change in viscosity, surface area, or phase separation after storage. The aerobic mesophilic total viable count was <5.0 cfu/g emulsion at the beginning of the storage, which was below the detection limit. Microbial metabolites such as CO2 were below the detection limit of 0.1% in the headspace gas analysis in all vials after storage, which indicates that the possibly existing microorganisms have not multiplied. Therefore, it can be concluded that the samples were sufficiently preserved and oxygen was not consumed by respiring microorganisms. At the end of storage, it was observed that the oxygen sensors of almost all samples were intact and provided realistic results. One sample from the triple determination of phenethyl alcohol had to be excluded as an outlier due to leakage. The samples considered for evaluation showed average oxygen contents, which neither remained too close to atmospheric conditions nor approached zero absorbing the oxygen completely.
Using the headspace oxygen concentration results and the product weight, the oxygen uptake in mg oxygen per 100 g product (mg O2/100 g) was calculated (Figure 2). The graph shows that the uptake of oxygen was greatest for the samples containing potassium sorbate and benzyl alcohol. The slope was very high at the beginning of the storage and flattened out during the later measurement points. Samples with ethanol and glyceryl caprylate remained constant and showed oxygen uptake around zero. Phenethyl alcohol was in the middle range but showed a slight decrease after initially strong oxygen uptake.
It can be assumed that oxygen from the headspace was absorbed by the sample to form oxidation products due to the following reasons: Other oxygen-consuming reactions were unlikely since only unsaturated fatty acids in the lipid phase were able to absorb oxygen and microbial influences were excluded. Thus, the uptake of oxygen correlated directly with oxidation and the used preservative ingredient. As a result, oxidation can be assumed clearly for phenethyl alcohol, potassium sorbate, and benzyl alcohol. On the other hand, a decrease in oxygen uptake can be caused by a release of oxygen into the headspace by solved oxygen and air bubbles from the samples or from leaks in the seals of the vials. Due to the high gas barrier of the vial (glass), diffusion of oxygen through the vial material was basically not existent. It is unlikely that reactions had occurred that produce molecular oxygen. In all these cases, no oxidation would be measured. However, this affected only the samples with ethanol, where the oxygen uptake was below zero throughout the storage period. Although a slight increase in oxygen was measurable in the vials, oxidation was assumed to be not strong enough to compensate for this increase. The low oxygen uptake can be caused by the polarity change due to the high concentration of added ethanol since the ethanol content in the water phase has an influence on the solubility of oxygen [65,66]. As the transfer of oxygen through the water phase to the micelles is the limiting factor for oxidation, an altered oxygen solubility could have an impact on oxidation.
For significance testing, a one-factor ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05 was applied to the oxygen uptake data after 96 days of storage. Mean values differed significantly (p-value = 0.0027). Afterward, a two-sample t-test (one-sided, with different variances) was used to test the significant differences between the two groups. The results are presented in Table 3. The oxidation of potassium sorbate was significantly higher than that of ethanol and glyceryl caprylate. The oxygen uptake of the variant with benzyl alcohol was significantly higher than with ethanol. Preservation with ethanol and glyceryl caprylate resulted in significantly lower oxidation than with potassium sorbate and benzyl alcohol. The other variants showed no significant differences.
Furthermore, the daily oxygen consumption rate was calculated in mg oxygen per 100 g product per day of storage (mg O2/100 g/d) based on the oxygen uptake data, which allows the estimation of the average oxidation rate (Figure 3). The diagram shows that the variants with potassium sorbate and benzyl alcohol absorbed the highest mean amount of daily oxygen consumption per day, while phenethyl alcohol, ethanol, and glyceryl stearate were the lowest. For ethanol, the value was also in the negative range, as in Figure 2, indicating that the oxidative processes were too weak to consume the oxygen entering the headspace. Since these data were calculated based on the data in Figure 2, the same argumentation can also be applied here, and the data can be interpreted as a measure of oxidation. The advantage of this representation is the estimation of the kinetics (oxidation rate per day) and the simplified summarized representation of a large volume of data.
To test statistical significance, again a one-way factorial ANOVA and a one-sided two-sample t-test for different variances were used. The ANOVA provided no evidence of significant mean differences. The t-test showed that the daily oxygen consumption rate from the sample with potassium sorbate was significantly higher than with ethanol and glyceryl caprylate (Table 4). The other variants showed no significant differences.
The comparison of both methods showed that the oxygen uptake delivered better the progression of oxidation with many data points, while the daily oxygen consumption rate better summarized the oxidation kinetics. Although the mean values of the daily oxygen consumption rate were comparable to the measurements of the oxygen uptake after 96 days, the standard deviation was clearly higher and made it difficult to prove significance. The reason for this could be that the calculation of the daily oxygen consumption rate also includes the values from the beginning of the measurement, where all samples did not show any differences in oxidation. The advantage of the daily oxygen consumption rate is that all data points are included in the calculation, and possible inaccuracies are less considered. The statistical evaluation of the oxygen uptake occurred only at the end of the storage, when the samples already had enough time to show significant oxidation. This improved standard deviation and significance testing but only considered a smaller number of data.
It can be shown from the data that potassium sorbate and benzyl alcohol had a pro-oxidant effect and accelerated the oxidation of the O/W emulsion strongly in this test, while phenethyl alcohol showed a moderate acceleration. Ethanol and glyceryl caprylate showed no oxidation accelerating effect in this test. These data are therefore consistent with the sources discussed earlier in the introduction. In order to describe whether ingredients significantly influence oxidation, as in this case, an experimental setup of at least 96 days at 30 °C with light exposure was suitable. Both parameters, oxygen uptake, and daily oxygen consumption rate can be used to determine oxidation. However, due to the lack of a blank sample, it was not possible to quantify how much the preservatives enhanced oxidation compared to a sample where preservatives were absent.
The oxidation showed a meaningful level for use in practice. Using the example of the sample with potassium sorbate, a total of 20.01 mg O2 (0.32 mol) was absorbed per 100 g over the storage time. This is a high value compared with soybean oil, which contains also a high amount of linoleic acid and is no longer perceived as acceptable from 3–4 mg of absorbed oxygen per 100 g [67]. This low threshold may be caused by the high concentration of unsaturated fatty acids in plant-based oils, which oxidize and produce off-flavors faster. The emulsion in this study contained 22.80 g of canola oil per 100 g, of which 6.84 g was linoleic acid. This fatty acid can be converted to hexanal as the main oxidation product and has a perception threshold of 320 µg/kg oil (orthonasal) [68]. Data show after absorption of 57.05 mg O2 per gram of linoleic acid (0.5 mol O2/mol oil), a total of 7.65 mg of volatile products were found, of which 5.10 mg was hexanal [68]. Transferred to the data of this study, 100 g of the emulsion would only need to react with 0.36 mg of O2 to reach the hexanal perception limit. Other studies described a rancid odor threshold for hexanal concentrations above 5 to 10 ppm in low-fat foods [69]. To reach this limit, 100 g emulsion should have absorbed just 5.59 to 11.19 mg oxygen. Assuming that 1 mol O2 could lead to oxidation of 1 mol of oxygen-sensitive substances, a change in the shelf life, efficacy, and acceptance of the product is possible at the high intake of 0.32 mol O2 per 100 g. While to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is currently no study in the literature describing the distribution of oxygen leading to oxidation and its shelf-life-limiting effects in O/W emulsions, it is likely that this low threshold could be reached and result in compromised quality.
To maintain the quality of cosmetic products, it is important to tolerate as minimal oxidation as possible. Therefore, pro-oxidant substances should be avoided, reduced, or compensated, even if preservatives are the cause of accelerated oxidation. It is recommended to investigate other preservatives and multifunctionals for their influence on oxidation in the future to discover possible alternatives or identify more unknown pro-oxidant effects. It is likely that preservatives or multifunctionals with similar molecular structures such as benzoic acid, anisic acid, phenoxyethanol, phenylpropanol, salicylic acid, or thymol may also have an effect on oxidation. Additionally, the question is whether molecules without unsaturated carbon bonds, such as levulinic acid, methylpropanediol, ethylhexylglycerol, or pentylene glycol, can influence oxidation. Optimization of the use concentration should also be considered, either by reduction, synergistic combination, or individual adaptation to the microbial risk of each application. Antioxidants can be used to compensate for the effect, for example, natural polyphenols, but their concentration should be optimized in further research, and possible synergistic and antagonistic effects with the preservatives should be investigated. In addition, synergistic or antagonistic effects with other cosmetic ingredients should also be studied to avoid negative effects such as the formation of benzene that was described for benzyl alcohol and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) [70]. Some ingredients such as tocopherols (vitamin E) can themselves lead to undesirable pro-oxidant effects if used in inappropriate concentrations [18,71]. Additionally, polyphenolic antioxidants are found to be pro-oxidants in high dosages [72]. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the dosage of antioxidants individually to the ingredients contained. For future research, in addition to oxygen uptake, a quantification of volatile components is recommended and an organoleptic evaluation should occur to quantify the actual off-flavors in the emulsion matrix to correlate human perception with oxidation. It is of high interest to determine at which oxygen uptake value a significant change in the quality and efficacy or consumer perception of the product occurs and by what methods this period can be extended. Further data are necessary to verify how the preservative-caused oxidation can influence the shelf life of the products. Analysis of droplet size, rheological analysis, and analysis of oxidation products would also ideally enhance further research. Furthermore, it should be investigated whether the oxidation can also be transferred to W/O-emulsions or O/W emulsions with other ingredients.

4. Conclusions

The switch to natural and consumer-accepted preservatives requires rapid research and development of new active ingredients, but long-term shelf-life-limiting effects such as oxidation must also be taken into account. This could lead to reduced preservation of the oxidation-sensitive active ingredients and, thus, have a negative impact on the quality and efficacy of the product. In this study, potassium sorbate and benzyl alcohol showed significant pro-oxidant effects in the O/W emulsion tested. Both oxygen uptake and daily oxygen consumption rate were suitable for oxidation estimation. However, oxidation processes are highly dependent on the matrix and should be optimized individually for each product. These results indicate that other substances currently used as preservatives and multifunctionals could also have a negative effect on shelf life. Further research should be conducted to characterize these effects in more detail and to find methods to avoid or reduce them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.; methodology, H.Z.; data curation, A.S. and H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and H.Z. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Christine Berger and Christopher Schmidt for the experimental support of this study. We would also like to thank Katrin Bach at the Management Center Innsbruck (MCI) for the constructive and helpful suggestions as well as the professional and competent supervision of this master thesis. We also appreciate Frank Welle’s proofreading and support. The present work was performed in (partial) fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. rer. biol. hum.” from FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg for A.S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction to the Acknowledgments. The present work was performed in (partial) fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree "Dr. rer. biol. hum." from FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg for A.S. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

References

  1. Matwiejczuk:, N.; Galicka, A.; Brzóska, M.M. Review of the safety of application of cosmetic products containing parabens. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2020, 40, 176–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matić, M.; Puh, B. Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Towards Natural Cosmetics. Ekon. Vjesn. Econviews-Rev. Contemp. Bus. Entrep. Econ. Issues 2016, 29, 53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kale, S.N.; Deore, S.L. Emulsion micro emulsion and nano emulsion: A review. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2017, 8, S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Köhler, K.; Schuchmann, I.H.P. Emulgiertechnik: Grundlagen, Verfahren und Anwendungen; Behr‘s Verlag: Hamburg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bährle-Rapp, M. Springer Lexikon Kosmetik und Körperpflege, 5th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lagaly, G.; Schulz, O.; Zimehl, R. Dispersionen und Emulsionen: Eine Einführung in die Kolloidik feinverteilter Stoffe einschließlich der Tonminerale; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nour, A.H. Emulsion types, stability mechanisms and rheology: A review. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud. (IJIRSS) 2018, 1, 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  8. Halla, N.; Fernandes, I.P.; Heleno, S.A.; Costa, P.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Boucherit, K.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barreiro, M.F. Cosmetics preservation: A review on present strategies. Molecules 2018, 23, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lück, E. Chemische Lebensmittelkonservierung: Stoffe Wirkungen Methoden; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rähse, W. Cosmetic Creams: Development, Manufacture and Marketing of Effective Skin Care Products; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Das Europäische Parlament und der Rat der Europäischen Union. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1223/2009 des Europäischen Perlaments und des Rates vom 30. November 2009 Über Kosmetische Mittel: VO (EG) Nr.1223/2009; Das Europäische Parlament und der Rat der Europäischen Union: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Evonik Dr. Straetmans GmbH. Product Data Sheet Phenethylalcohol Nat; Evonik Dr. Straetmans GmbH: Hamburg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. TRI-K, Inc. Product Data Sheet Potassium Sorbate FCC; TRI-K, Inc.: Channahon, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kampf, G.; Rudolf, M.; Labadie, J.-C.; Barrett, S.P. Spectrum of antimicrobial activity and user acceptability of the hand disinfectant agent Sterillium Gel. J. Hosp. Infect. 2002, 52, 141–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Merck KGaA. Products Data Sheet RonaCare; Merck KGaA: Darmstadt, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Evonik Dr. Straetmans GmbH. Product Data Sheet Dermosoft® GMCY MB; Evonik Dr. Straetmans GmbH: Hamburg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunstone, F.D.; Norris, F.A. Lipids in Food Chemistry, Biochemistry and Technology; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  18. Werman, M.J.; Neeman, I. Oxidative stability of avocado oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1986, 63, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McClements, D.J.; Decker, E.A. Lipid oxidation in oil-in-water emulsions: Impact of molecular environment on chemical reactions in heterogeneous food systems. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1270–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matissek, R.; Baltes, W. Lebensmittelchemie, 8th ed.; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eghbaliferiz, S.; Iranshahi, M. Pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins and carotenoids: Updated review of mechanisms and catalyzing metals. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oroian, M.; Escriche, I. Antioxidants: Characterization, natural sources, extraction and analysis. Food Res. Int. 2015, 74, 10–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Springer, A.; Destler, E.; Pazurik, B.; Platzer, M.; Kiese, S. Sustainable & Long-lasting: Natural Cosmetics Made from Purely Plant-based Ingredients. Sofwjournal 2022, 148, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Durand, E.; Figueroa-Espinoza, M.C.; Lecomte, J.; Villeneuve, P. Hurdles in Predicting Antioxidant Efficacy in Oil-in-water emulsions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, D.C.; Goldman, M.P.A. Topical Anti-inflammatory Healing Regimen Utilizing Conjugated Linolenic Acid for Use Post-ablative Laser Resurfacing of the Face: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Aesthetic Dermatol. 2017, 10, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferreira, M.J.; Fiadeiro, T.; Silvia, M.; Soares, A.P. Topical γ-linolenic acid therapy in atopic dermatitis. Allergo J. 1998, 7, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nasrollahi, S.A.; Ayatollahi, A.; Yazdanparast, T.; Samadi, A.; Hosseini, H.; Shamsipour, M.; Akhlaghi, A.A.; Yadangi, S.; Abels, C.; Firooz, A.; et al. Comparison of linoleic acid-containing water-in-oil emulsion with urea-containing water-in-oil emulsion in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A randomized clinical trial. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 11, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Girotti, A.W.; Kriska, T. Role of lipid hydroperoxides in photo-oxidative stress signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2004, 6, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kohen, R. Skin antioxidants: Their role in aging and in oxidative stress—New approaches for their evaluation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 1999, 53, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Briganti, S.; Picardo, M. Antioxidant activity, lipid peroxidation and skin diseases. What’s new. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2003, 17, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chiba, K.; Kawakami, K.; Sone, T.; Onoue, M. Characteristics of skin wrinkling and dermal changes induced by repeated application of squalene monohydroperoxide to hairless mouse skin. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2003, 16, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ohkido, M.; Yoshino, K.; Matsuo, I. Lipid peroxide of human skin. In Biochem. Norm. Abnorm. Epidermal Differ. 1981, 10, 269–278. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dey, S.; Nagababu, B.H. Applications of Food Colour and Bio-Preservatives in the Food and Its Effect on the Human Health. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gallarate, M.; Carlotti, M.E.; Trotta, M.; Bovo, S. On the stability of ascorbic acid in emulsified systems for topical and cosmetic use. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 188, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arnhold, T. Struktur Natürlicher und Synthetischer Retinoide In Untersuchungen zum Metabolismus von Vitamin A Retinoiden im Hinblick auf eine Risikoabschätzung Ihrer Teratogenen Wirkung Beim Menschen. Ph.D. Thesis, Der Tehnichen Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. James, A.M.; Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of mitochondrial Coenzyme, Q. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 2004, 423, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Schmidt, E.; Denkova, Z.; Slavchev, A.; Stoyanova, A.; Geissler, M. Purity, antimicrobial activities and olfactory evaluations of 2-phenylethanol and some derivatives. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lucchini, J.J.; Bonnaveiro, N.; Cremieux, A.; Le Goffic, F. Mechanism of bactericidal action of phenethyl alcohol in Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol. 1993, 27, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, Y.J.; Zhou, H.T.; Hu, Y.H.; Tang, J.Y.; Su, M.X.; Guo, Y.J.; Liu, B. Antityrosinase and antimicrobial activities of 2-phenylethanol, 2-phenylacetaldehyde and 2-phenylacetic acid. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Molinari, F.; Gandolfi, R.; Aragozzini, F.; Leon, R.; Prazeres, D.M. Biotransformations in two-liquid-phase systems: Production of phenylacetaldehyde by oxidation of 2-phenylethanol with acetic acid bacteria. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1999, 25, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sofos, J.N. Sorbate Food Preservatives; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lück, E. Food applications of sorbic acid and its salts. Food Addit. Contam. 1990, 7, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stopforth, J.D.; Sofos, J.N.; Busta, F.F. Sorbic acid and sorbates. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 145, 49. [Google Scholar]
  44. Elez-Martínez, P.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Oxidative rancidity in avocado purée as affected by α-tocopherol, sorbic acid and storage atmosphere. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 226, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gerschenson, L.N.; Campos, C.A. Sorbic acid stability during processing and storage of high moisture foods. In Food Preservation by Moisture Control; Cánovas, B., Chanes, W., Eds.; Technomic Publishing Co: Lancaster, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  46. Windholz, M. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals and Drugs, 9th ed.; Merck: Rahway, NJ, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cillard, J.; Cillard, P.; Cormier, M. Effect of experimental factors on the pro-oxidant behavior of α-tocopherol. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1980, 57, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jacob, S.E.; Barron, G.S. Benzyl alcohol: A covert fragrance. Dermatitis 2007, 18, 232–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gottschalck, T.E.; Bailey, J.E. International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, 13th ed.; Personal Care Products Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mashayekhi, H.A.; Rezaee, M.; Garmaroudi, S.S.; Montazeri, N.; Ahmadi, S.J. Rapid and sensitive determination of benzaldehyde arising from benzyl alcohol used as preservative in an injectable formulation solution using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography. Anal. Sci. 2011, 27, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Johnson, W.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Safety Assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid and its Salts, and Benzyl Benzoate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2017, 36, 5–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Warth, A.D. Mechanism of action of benzoic acid on Zygosaccharomyces bailii: Effects on glycolytic metabolite levels, energy production, and intracellular pH. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 3410–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Medeiros Vinci, R.; De Meulenaer, B.; Andjelkovic, M.; Canfyn, M.; Van Overmeire, I.; Van Loco, J. Factors influencing benzene formation from the decarboxylation of benzoate in liquid model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 12975–12981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frank, S.; Dunkel, A.; Schieberle, P. Model studies on benzene formation from benzaldehyde. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sadighara, P.; Pirhadi, M.; Sadighara, M.; Shavaly-Gilani, P.; Zirak, M.R.; Zeinali, T. Benzene food exposure and their prevent methods: A review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2022, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hung, L.C.; Ismail, R.; Basri, M.; Nang, H.L.L.; Tejo, B.A.; Abu Hassan, H.; May, C.Y. Testing of glyceryl monoesters for their anti-microbial susceptibility and their influence in emulsions. J. Oil Palm Res. 2010, 22, 846–855. [Google Scholar]
  57. Manning, M.; Orawski, P. Food grade esters used as personal care antimicrobials. Cosmet. Toil. 2005, 120, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ahn, G.W.; Choi, M.H.; Woo, Y.T.; Jo, B.K. A Study on the Antimicrobial Effect of Glyceryl Caprylate in Cosmetics. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea 2007, 33, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lawan, K.; Kanlayavattanakul, M. Antimicrobial efficacy of caprylyl glycol and ethylhexylglycerine in emulsion. J. Health Res. 2009, 23, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  60. Martínez, M.L.; Penci, M.; Ixtaina, V.; Ribbota, P.D.; Maesti, D. Effect of natural and synthetic antioxidants on the oxidative stability of walnut oil under different storage conditions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bachofen, R. Gas metabolism of microorganisms. Experientia 1991, 47, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pascual, O.; Vignault, A.; Gombau, J.; Navarro, M.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; García-Romero, E.; Canals, J.M.; Hermosín-Gutíerrez, I.; Teissedre, P.-L.; Zamora, F. Oxygen consumption rates by different oenological tannins in a model wine solution. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Navarro, M.; Vignault, A.; Gombau, J.; Navarro, M.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; García-Romero, E.; Canalset, J.M.; Hermosín-Gutíerrez, I.; Teissedre, P.-L.; Zamora, F. Oxygen consumption by oak chips in a model wine solution—Influence of the botanical origin, toast level and ellagitannin content. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Böhner, N. Einfluss der Handelsbeleuchtung auf die Qualität lichtempfindlicher Lebensmittel am Beispiel von Brühwurst und Kaffeesahne. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  65. Malviya, A.; Jadran, V. Henry’s law constant of nitrogen, oxygen, and argon in ternary aqueous alcoholic solvent mixtures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2019, 65, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tokunaga, J. Solubilities of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide in aqueous alcohol solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1975, 20, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ahlhaus, O.E. Verpackung mit Kunststoffen, 1st ed.; Hanser Verlag: München, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  68. Belitz, H.-D.; Grosch, W.; Schieberle, P. Lehrbuch der Lebensmittelchemie, 6th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; p. 208. [Google Scholar]
  69. Fritsch, C.W.; Gale, J.A. Hexanal as a measure of rancidity in low fat foods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1977, 54, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bocharova, O.; Sentyabrina, R.; Vasiliy, E. Toluene and benzyl alcohol formation in fruit juices containing benzoates. J. Food Processing Preserv. 2017, 41, 13054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fennema, O.R. Food Chemistry; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996; Volume 76. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ofosu, F.K.; Daliri, E.B.M.; Elahi, F.; Chelliah, R.; Lee, B.H.; Oh, D.H. New insights on the use of polyphenols as natural preservatives and their emerging safety concerns. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 525810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cosmetics 09 00059 g001
Figure 1. Scheme for experimental setup for measuring the oxygen uptake of emulsions during an accelerated storage test.
Figure 1. Scheme for experimental setup for measuring the oxygen uptake of emulsions during an accelerated storage test.
Cosmetics 09 00059 g001
Cosmetics 09 00059 g002
Figure 2. Development of oxygen uptake (mean ± standard deviation) (mg O2/100 g) with different preservatives, calculated from the oxygen concentration in the headspace measured over a storage time of 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure.
Figure 2. Development of oxygen uptake (mean ± standard deviation) (mg O2/100 g) with different preservatives, calculated from the oxygen concentration in the headspace measured over a storage time of 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure.
Cosmetics 09 00059 g002
Cosmetics 09 00059 g003
Figure 3. Daily oxygen consumption rate (mean ± standard deviation) (mg O2/100 g/d) with different preservatives, calculated from the oxygen uptake measured over a storage time of 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure.
Figure 3. Daily oxygen consumption rate (mean ± standard deviation) (mg O2/100 g/d) with different preservatives, calculated from the oxygen uptake measured over a storage time of 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure.
Cosmetics 09 00059 g003
Table 1. Overview of selected preservatives.
Table 1. Overview of selected preservatives.
PreservativepH-RangeWater Solubility (g/L)Preservation SpectrumMax. Quantity [11] (%)
Phenethyl alcohol [12]unlimited20gram −, mold0.7–1.0
Potassium sorbate [13]<6582yeast, mold0.6
Ethanol [14]allunlimitedbroad spectrum20.0
Benzyl alcohol [15]<4.540broad spectrum0.5
Glyceryl caprylate [16]4.0–7.0not specifiedgram +, yeast0.3–1.0
Table 2. Overview of the formulations used.
Table 2. Overview of the formulations used.
PreservativeWater (%)Canola Oil (%)Glyceryl Stearate SE (%)Xanthan Gum (%)pH-Regulator (%)Preservative (%)
Phenethyl alcohol69.322.87.00.20.20.7
Potassium sorbate69.822.87.00.20.20.2
Ethanol55.022.87.00.20.215.0
Benzyl alcohol69.522.87.00.20.20.5
Glyceryl caprylate69.722.87.00.20.20.3
Table 3. Significance of oxygen uptake (mg O2/100 g) depending on used preservative after 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure between two samples using one-tailed two-sample t-test for different variances (α < 0.05 = *, not significant = n.s.).
Table 3. Significance of oxygen uptake (mg O2/100 g) depending on used preservative after 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure between two samples using one-tailed two-sample t-test for different variances (α < 0.05 = *, not significant = n.s.).
Potassium SorbateEthanolBenzyl AlcoholGlyceryl Caprylate
Phenethyl alcoholn.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.
Potassium sorbate *n.s.*
Ethanol *n.s.
Benzyl alcohol *
Table 4. Significance of daily oxygen consumption rate (mg O2/100 g/d) depending on used preservative after 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure between two samples using one-tailed two-sample t-test for different variances (α < 0.05 = *, not significant = n.s.).
Table 4. Significance of daily oxygen consumption rate (mg O2/100 g/d) depending on used preservative after 96 days at 30 °C under light exposure between two samples using one-tailed two-sample t-test for different variances (α < 0.05 = *, not significant = n.s.).
Potassium SorbateEthanolBenzyl AlcoholGlyceryl Caprylate
Phenethyl alcoholn.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.
Potassium sorbate *n.s.*
Ethanol n.s.n.s.
Benzyl alcohol n.s.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Springer, A.; Ziegler, H. The Role of Preservatives and Multifunctionals on the Oxidation of Cosmetic O/W Emulsions. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9030059

AMA Style

Springer A, Ziegler H. The Role of Preservatives and Multifunctionals on the Oxidation of Cosmetic O/W Emulsions. Cosmetics. 2022; 9(3):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9030059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Springer, Arielle, and Helena Ziegler. 2022. "The Role of Preservatives and Multifunctionals on the Oxidation of Cosmetic O/W Emulsions" Cosmetics 9, no. 3: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9030059

APA Style

Springer, A., & Ziegler, H. (2022). The Role of Preservatives and Multifunctionals on the Oxidation of Cosmetic O/W Emulsions. Cosmetics, 9(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9030059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop