Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Protective Effects of Phaeodactylum tricornutum Extract on LPS-Treated Fibroblasts
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Quality Control Method for the Determination of the Refractive Index of Oil-in-Water Creams and Its Correlation with Skin Hydration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pharmacists’ Insights and Behaviors in Preventing the Misuse of Topical Corticosteroids in Pakistan: A Mixed-Method Study
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Trends in Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Effects: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published during 1957–2021

1
Department of Pharmacy Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
2
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2021, 8(3), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030075
Received: 19 June 2021 / Revised: 24 July 2021 / Accepted: 25 July 2021 / Published: 24 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cosmetovigilance: Public Health Perspective)

Abstract

:
Cosmetic and beauty products, though not essential for physical health, go a long way in providing mental well-being and confidence, and hence are used substantially. Increasing utilization of varying cosmetic products leads to a multitude of adverse effects. There is more awareness about cosmeceutics, cosmetic products and their adverse effects, and studies on the same are currently trending. Bibliometrics has become a prominent and growing field of research in recent years. The aim of this research was to assess bibliometric features and conduct systematic trend analysis on the literature available on cosmetics’ adverse effects. We analyzed all the published documents that included the keywords “cosmetics” and “adverse effects” between 1957 and 2021. We performed a detailed scientometric and bibliometric assessment in this field. A total of 4127 articles were retrieved from the databases provided by Scopus, which most were original articles. The United States ranked first and dominated the literature with 1292 (31.44%) documents followed by South Korea 7.47%. Harvard medical school was the most productive institution (1.16%). The study of the adverse effects of cosmetics should be supported and taken up by the researchers/authors from developing and underdeveloped countries.

1. Introduction

“Cosmetics are [sic] defined by their intended use as a material rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body for beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance”. Cosmetics are mainly used to increase glamour and appeal, and play an important role in the development of an image and in the process of appearing presentable to others. At their rate of use, cosmetics heavily impact the skin and can show effective as well as ineffective results [1,2]. Linda B et al., in his study, found that 25% women use around 15 cosmetic products daily, adults use 9 cosmetic products daily and also found that around 1–3% of the population are allergic to cosmetic ingredients [3]. Cosmetics and beauty products are not particularly beneficial to one’s physical health and continued use can cause serious health adversities. The cosmetic ingredients used in beauty products have a direct impact on the human body’s hormonal system, causing endocrine disruption [4]. Heavy metals are one of the most common ingredients in cosmetics, and they cause skin irritation and epithelial damage. The accumulation of heavy metals has a negative impact on mucous membranes [5].These adverse events are rising day by day because of the increased use of cosmetic products. Women are known to use more cosmetic products compared with men.
A vast majority do not follow the instructions given in cosmetic packaging [6]. According to the literature, conducting cosmetic product awareness campaigns and encouraging the idea of cosmetovigilance can help to minimize adverse events [7]. “Bibliometrics is a novel and popular scientific field investigating academic literature and analyzing publication trends and patterns in a certain area” [8]. Despite the growing popularity of scientometric and bibliometric assessments of scientific evidence, there is no research in dermatology and medical literature that examines the bibliometric features of articles on cosmetic-related adverse reactions. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic bibliometric review of the literature on the adverse effects of cosmetics and produce a trend analysis in this broad field.

2. Materials and Methods

Search tool and strategy
Study design: A retrospective bibliometric analysis was used.
Inclusion criteria: All the documents published between 1957 and April 2021 were included in the study. All the manuscripts were considered in this study including letters to the editor and note.
Exclusion criteria: Manuscript published after April 2021 were excluded from the study.
To acquire articles on the adverse effects of cosmetics across time, the Scopus database (https://www.scopus.com, 24 April 2021, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used. “Scopus® is the world’s largest abstract and citation database for peer-reviewed literature, with the most comprehensive analysis of published papers in the field of health science” [9]. The descriptive bibliometric analysis was carried out using Scopus’s built-in functions. (“Distribution of types of documents and the most prolific publications, authors, institutions, and countries”). In March 2021, the search was performed using the keywords “cosmetics” and “adverse effects” as a search term to retrieve all possible papers aggregated within the group from the Scopus® database. For the trend analysis of the average number of articles, pages, references, organizations, authors and citations each year, we exported all information with reference records (all article editors and references) from the Scopus database in CSV format into Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA, USA), and used Excel’s Generate Text feature and its statistical functions to determine yearly averages. We also produced bibliometric network maps that depicted the most commonly used keywords, as well as the relationships and connections between countries. In this research, we used the freeware resource VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) to create bibliometric network visualization maps. The role of the software is connecting the nodes in the network to the clusters; thus, in a way, a cluster is a set of nodes that are loosely related. As the value of this parameter grows, the number of clusters also increases. Each cluster is represented accordingly by a color. The terms that are more important have larger circles, and terms that were strongly related to each other were closer. Lines between terms indicate, by thickness, a stronger link between the two terms [10,11].

3. Results

3.1. Total Number of Publications

The Scopus database produced 4127 documents during our search. It was found that 1004 items were “open access”. A majority of the publications were “original articles” (n = 2948; 71.43%), followed by review (n = 802; 19.43%). The other most commonly published forms were book chapters and letters (2.64% and 2.02%, respectively) (Table 1).
The United States of America, with 1292 items, was the leading country contributing to the literature (31.40%) followed by South Korea, Germany, United Kingdom and China (7.46%, 6.85%, 6.78% and 6.67%, respectively). The majority of countries ranked by the total number of publications were developed countries, and the least publications were from developing and under developed countries. India produced only 3.82% of all cosmetic adverse effect literature (n = 158 articles) (Figure 1).

3.1.1. Research Areas, Journals, Institutions and Authors

The most researched fields in the literature related to adverse effects of cosmetics were found to be medicine, followed by pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics, as well as biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology (78.04%, 15.41%, and 9.93 %) (Table 2).
Andersen, F.A., from Cosmetic Ingredient Review, Washington, D.C., United States, was found to be the most productive author, with 33 papers amounting to 0.79% of total, followed by Kim, B.J., from South Korea’s Chung Ang University and Carruthers, J. from the University of British Columbia (0.65% and 0.41%, respectively). A majority of the authors were from developed countries (Table 3).
Harvard Medical School was found to be the most productive institution, with 48 items (1.16%), followed by the University of British Columbia (0.94%), whereas Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine had the least number of contributions among the top ten institutions. Many of the organizations were from developed countries (Table 4).
The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology was the leading journal contributing to the literature on the adverse effects of cosmetics, and covered 4.16% of all documents, followed by the journals Dermatologic Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery (3.85% and 3.17%, respectively) (Table 5).

3.1.2. Progression of Publications and Citations

We conducted a citation review of the literature on the adverse effects of cosmetics over the last decade’s 4127 articles. The most cited article was entitled “Bacterial Silver resistance: Molecular Biology and Uses and Misuses of Silver Compounds” by Silver, S., published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews, was cited 935 times, followed by “Chemistry, Bio-Chemistry, and Safety of Acrylamide: a Review” by Friedman, M., published in the Journal of Agriculture Chemistry, with 874 citations in 2003. The year 2003 had the most publications, i.e. three of the ten most cited articles, with 2471 total citations (Table 6).

3.1.3. Bibliometric Network Analysis

We noticed that the most commonly used keywords in this study were “human”, “humans”, “cosmetic techniques” and “adverse effects”, after conducting a systematic keyword study. We created a bibliometric keyword network visualization map with the keyword “human” in the middle and connected it to the other keywords (Figure 2).
We also created a bibliometric countries network visualization map of produced documents; this revealed four main centers, including USA, China, the United Kingdom and South Korea, in which the United States of America was in the middle and linked to the other countries as a result of our comprehensive country analysis (Figure 3).
We found that the maximum number of publications (513) are in the year 2015 (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The global cosmetic industry is estimated to be worth about $20 billion dollars today [12]. The cosmetic industry has seen tremendous growth in the last 20 years, resulting in a wide variety of products to protect and moisturise skin, as well as fight inflammation and signs of ageing [13]. The cosmetics industry is a highly creative industry and contributes significantly to national and regional economies around the world [14]. Innovation is one of the basic principles in this field. Women, in particular, use beauty products that may contain harmful cosmetic ingredients [12].
“Cosmetics are preparations that are applied directly to the human skin, hair, and nails, however, recent concerns about their safety have been increasing”. Metals in cosmetics may be retained and absorbed into the bloodstream, causing harmful effects in various organs [15]. Preservatives, stabilisers and mineral pigments are applied to cosmetic products to improve their consistency and quality. In order to obtain a better shine in some mineral pigments, glitter and dye are added to these products. Any of these substances can cause allergic reactions, irritation and harm to human health [5]. Acute toxicity, skin irritation, eye irritation, skin sensitization, sub-acute toxicity, mutagenicity/genotoxicity, type IV hypersensitivity, contact urticaria and other adverse effects can occur due to the use of cosmetics [16]. Irritant contact dermatitis is the most prevalent problem associated with the use of cosmetics. [17]. Perfumes, nail polish and other skincare items stay on the skin for longer periods of time and might cause allergic reactions [18]. “Skin care products are [sic] a kind of umbrella term covering cleansing, changing appearance, perfuming, changing body odor, protecting and keeping the skin in good condition” [19]. “Perfume is a mixture of fragrant essential oils or aroma compounds, fixatives and solvents, used to give the human body, animals, food, objects, and living-spaces an agreeable scent.” [20]. “A fragrance consists of volatile chemicals with a molecular weight of less than 300 Da that humans perceive through the olfactory system” [21].
Some of the common cosmetics products and their toxicities are:
Shampoos: Hydrogen peroxide solutions and ammonium persulfate, which are active chemicals in hair bleaching products, can trigger Types I and IV allergic contact reactions [12].
Skin lightening agent: Hydroquinone (HQ), a skin lightening agent, has been identified as one of the most dangerous substances. Reports of ochronosis and possible mutagenicity have been discovered. Ochronosis is a rare HQ side effect, characterised by a gradual darkening of the area to which a cream containing high concentrations of HQ has been applied for many years. It causes irritation, burning and redness of the skin [22].
Henna dye, hair dye: Henna dye and hair dye contains the ingredient PPD (p-phenylenediamine) which can cause allergic reactions including blisters, surface oozing, weepy dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis, pruritic dermatitis, swelling and erythematous rashes on the skin [23].
Deodorants or antiperspirants: Ingredients or fragrances which are present in deodorants or antiperspirants may cause allergic reactions. Fragrances enter the body, through the nose, directly into the brain and can cause headaches, fatigue, dizziness and irritation to eyes, nose and throat. When fragrances are found in the air, they can cause airborne contact dermatitis. Phthalates present in fragrances are suspected hormone disrupters. Fragrances which are present in perfumes can cause allergic reactions, headaches and asthma [24].
The adverse effects associated with ingredients used in the formulation of cosmetics:
BHA and BHT: In moisturizers and lipsticks, synthetic chemicals such as BHA (butylated hydroxyl anisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxyl toluene) can cause allergic reactions to the skin. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified BHA as a human carcinogen. BHT in high concentrations can imitate hormones like oestrogen, and block the development of male sex hormones, causing reproductive problems [12,25]. When applied in high concentrations, moisturisers can irritate and exfoliate the skin [18].
Parabens: Preservatives are used to protect cosmetics from microbial contamination. The most commonly used preservative are parabens, which penetrate the skin and are suspected to interfere with hormonal functions. They imitate hormones like oestrogen and interfere with male reproductive function. When methylparaben is applied to the skin, it combines with other chemicals present in cosmetics, causing skin aging [12,26].
Siloxanes: Siloxanes are silicone-based chemicals that are used to soften and smooth a variety of cosmetic products. They are commonly used in facial treatments and moisturizers. Cyclotetrasiloxane and cyclopentasiloxane are two extensively used siloxanes that are hazardous to human health. Cyclotetrasiloxane is classified as an endocrine disruptor that interacts with human hormone function and, as a potential reproductive toxicant, may damage human fertility [12,27].
Adverse effects associated with heavy metals in cosmetics:
Heavy metals: Heavy metals present in cosmetics can accumulate in the body over a long period and can cause contact dermatitis, cancer, vomiting, reproductive disorders and headaches.
Lead: Lead is a heavy metal that can be found as an impurity in lipsticks and eye powders such as kajal, and has been associated with high blood lead levels in women and children, which are toxic to the body. Pregnant women are at higher risk because it can easily cross the placenta and reach the foetus’ brain. It can also be transferred to infants through lactating mothers’ milk [12,28].
Cadmium: Cadmium is a heavy metal that is present in most body and hair creams; it is absorbed into the body through dermal contact and stored in the kidney and liver. If ingested in high amounts it may lead to vomiting and severe stomach irritations. Exposure over a long time may lead to kidney damage [12].
Mercury: Mercury is a major ingredient used in most creams, skin lightening soaps and eye makeup. It is found in cosmetics in organic and inorganic forms. Kidneys are the major site of deposition of inorganic mercury; kidney damage is a common side effect of the inorganic mercury found in lotions and skin whitening soaps. Inorganic mercury poisoning has been reported in the USA, Mexico, Africa and Europe [29]. Because of health concerns, the US FDA has restricted nine ingredients from cosmetics, while the EU has banned over 1000 ingredients. The use of cosmetics should be limited, and people should be informed about the composition and application of cosmetics to reduce their harm [30]. To promote changes in the manufacture, marketing and use of cosmetic products by the general population, it is critical to apply a standard cosmetovigilance over the world [12,31]. “Cosmetovigilance is a model of safety monitoring of cosmetics. It can be considered as one of the elements in public health activities” [32]. This public health policy is a legal way of gathering information on the safety of cosmetics and their ingredients, in order to reduce the risks associated with cosmetics use [12,31].
Cosmetovigilance systems, in different countries, are as followed:
Europe: Cosmetics products sold in the European Union (EU) should meet stringent safety and quality requirements. The Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 of the European Union (EU) requires companies to collect and analyse reports of adverse health consequences (undesirable effects) from the cosmetic products they market [33,34].
Netherlands: The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority and the Netherlands Ministry of Health have agreed to monitor the adverse effects of cosmetics and have expressed a willingness to cooperate toward the establishment of a cosmetovigilance network [34].
Canada: In Canada, healthcare professionals and consumers are encouraged to report side effects as per their Natural Health Products (NHP) Regulations, which started in January 2004. The NHP is in charge of ensuring that all cosmetic products are properly licenced, sufficient evidence for safety and efficacy is provided, appropriate labelling is provided, good manufacturing practises are followed, ADRs are reported, clinical trials related to cosmetic products are kept up to date and be the source of information for product recalls to all consumers. There are reporting forms, with which adverse events must be reported within 15 days [35].
USA: In the USA cosmetics labelling and purity have been made necessary for the marketing of cosmetics by the US Food and Drug Administration. As a result, it is the responsibility of the cosmetics manufacturer in the United States to provide high-quality cosmetic products [36].
Germany and Sweden: These are the two countries that have a formal cosmetovigilance system. In Germany, information on human health effects after exposure to any kind of substance, including cosmetics, is submitted to the BfR (Budensinstitut fur Risikobewertun) in Berlin. Sweden has a Cosmetovigilance Center, which was established in 1989. The Department of Cosmetics, which is part of the MPA (Medical Products Agency) located in Uppsala, is in charge of it. It represents the Swedish national authority, which is responsible for collecting ACRs reported by various professional categories/persons (mostly general practitioners and medical specialists) [37].
India: Due to a lack of a well-organized reporting system in India, undesirable reactions to cosmetic products go unreported. Cosmetic-related adverse reactions have so far remained undetected. It is time for India to establish a formal cosmetovigilance system [38].
Most of the authors and organisations on the top ten productive lists were from developed countries, according to our findings. We found that Harvard Medical School was first among the top ten institutions reporting research investigating adverse cosmetics effects (1.16) (Table 4). We found that the maximum number of publications (513) are in the year 2015 (Figure 4). There has been no study investigating the bibliometric features of literature on adverse effects related to cosmetics. So far, there has been no study in the literature with which to compare our results.

5. Conclusions

Due to increasing consciousness about beauty, people are using more cosmetic products, which results in increasing adverse events. Cosmetic and beauty products are not that virtuous for health, as they contain more than 10,000 ingredients that can be linked to disease. Due to the continues use of cosmetics, people are exposed to adverse effects such as contact dermatitis, allergy, redness of skin, type IV hypersensitivity etc. Cosmetic ingredients used in cosmetic products have a direct effect on the hormonal systems of the human body. The public should be warned about the presence of toxic ingredients in cosmetic products. It is important to implement a global cosmetovigilance system to encourage changes in cosmetic product manufacturing, marketing and use by the general population. Such a system would increase the safety of these products and their ingredients and prevent the adverse effects of these products. It is important to carry out studies investigating adverse effect of cosmetics; we suggest that researchers across the globe, especially from developing and underdeveloped countries, perform more and more novel studies, particularly on cosmetics’ adverse effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: V.S.L.; methodology: M.N.; software: M.N.; validation, V.S.L., S.S.P. and D.S.; formal analysis: S.S.P.; investigation: D.S.; resources: M.N.; data curation: M.N.; writing—original draft preparation: M.N. and V.S.L.; writing—review and editing: D.S. and S.S.P.; visualization: D.S.; supervision: V.S.L.; project administration: V.S.L., D.S. and S.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

There is no data supporting reported results generated during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work.

References

  1. Getachew, M.; Tewelde, T. Cosmetic Use and Its Adverse Events among Female Employees of Jimma University, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 2018, 28, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mansor, N.; Efni binti, D.; Yaacob, M.R. Cosmetic Usage in Malaysia: Understanding of the Major Determinants Affecting the Users. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2010, 1, 273–281. [Google Scholar]
  3. Linda, B.; Sedlewicz, B.S. Cosmetic preservatives: Friend or foe? Skinmed 2005, 4, 8–100. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gowha, S.A. Harmful effects of beauty care products on human health. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health 2018, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaličanin, B.; Velimirović, D. A Study of the Possible Harmful Effects of Cosmetic Beauty Products on Human Health. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 170, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shiraz, A.; Rahaman, A.M. Study on Awareness about Adverse Health Effects of Cosmetics among Females of Different Age Groups. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Res. 2016, 7, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bilal, A.I.; Tilahun, Z.; Shimels, T.; Gelan, Y.D.; Osman, E. Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Events and Determinants among Jigjiga Town Residents, Eastern Ethiopia. Dermatol. Ther. 2017, 7, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Şenel, E.; Demir, E.; Alkan, R.M. Bibliometric analysis on global Behçet disease publications during 1980–2014: Is there a Silk Road in the literature? J. Eur. Acad. Derm. Venereol. 2017, 31, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Scopus. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/en-in/solutions/scopus (accessed on 24 April 2021).
  10. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2021).
  11. Mattos, F.D.F.; Perazzo, M.F.; Vargas Ferreira, F.; Martins-Júnior, P.A.; Paiva, S.M. Top 100 most-cited papers in core dental public health journals: Bibliometric analysis. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2021, 49, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, A.; Alam, M. Cosmetics and their associated adverse effects: A review. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Rodrigues, F.; Carretero, A.S. Cosmetics. 2018. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/cosmetics (accessed on 4 April 2021).
  14. Singh, B.M.; Jain, A.; Mishra, A. Cosmetic Regulations in India vs. Globally and Challenges in Harmonization. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Drug Res. 2018, 10, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Borowska, S.; Brzóska, M.M. Metals in cosmetics: Implications for human health. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35, 551–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nigam, P.K. Adverse reactions to cosmetics and methods of testing. Indian J. Derm. Venereol. Lepro. L 2009, 75, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Draelos, Z.D. Facial skin care products and cosmetics. Clin. Derm. 2014, 32, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dooms-Goosens, A. Cosmetics as causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis 1993, 52, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kottner, J.; Lichterfeld, A.; Blume-Peytavi, U. Maintaining skinintegrity in the aged: A systematic review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2013, 169, 528–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, N.; Naziya, S.; Supriya, K.; Ahmed, S.A.; Kalyani, G.; Ganeshwari, S.; Rao, K.N.V.; Dutt, K.R. A Review on Perfumery. World J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 7, 56–68. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sowndhararajan, K.; Kim, S. Influence of Fragrances on Human Psychophysiological Activity: With Special Reference to Human Electroencephalographic Response. Sci. Pharm. 2016, 84, 724–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  22. Donsing, P.; Viyoch, J. Thai Breadfruit’s Heartwood Extract: A New Approach to Skin Whitening. Srinakharinwirot Sci. J. 2008, 24, 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nigam, P.K.; Saxena, A.K. Allergic contact dermatitis from henna. Contact Dermat. 1988, 18, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bridges, B. Fragrance: Emerging health and environmental concerns. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schrader, T.J.; Cooke, G.M. Examination of selected food additives and organochlorine food contaminants for androgenic activity in vitro. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 53, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Darbre, P.D.; Aljarrah, A.; Miller, W.R.; Coldham, N.G.; Sauer, M.J.; Pope, G.S. Concentrations of Parabens in human breast tumours. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2004, 24, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Curtis, J.; Colas, A. Medical applications of silicones. In Biomaterials Science; Ratner, B.D., Man, A.S.H., Schoen, F.J., Lemons, J.E., Eds.; Elsevier/Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zakaria, A.; Ho, Y.B. Heavy metals contamination in lipsticks and their associated health risks to lipstick consumers. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 73, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mehrdad, R.R.; Mehravar, R.R.; Sohrab, K.; Moghadamnia, A.A. Current approaches of the management of mercury poisoning: Need of the hour. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 22, 22–46. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jadhav, V.; Dhande, S.; Kadam, V. Cosmetic’s side effects. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 6, 327–343. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pereira, J.X.; Pereira, T.C. Cosmetics and its Health Risks. Glob. J. Med. Res. 2018, 18, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Lucca, J.M.; Joseph, R.; Al Kubaish, Z.H.; Al-Maskeen, S.M.; Alokaili, Z.A. An observational study on adverse reactions of cosmetics: The need of practice the Cosmetovigilance system. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Renner, G.; Audebert, F.; Burfeindt, J.; Calvet, B.; Caratas-Perifan, M.; Leal, M.E.; Gorni, R.; Long, A.; Meredith, E.; O’Sullivan, Ú.; et al. Cosmetics Europe Guidelines on the Management of Undesirable Effects and Reporting of Serious Undesirable Effects from Cosmetics in the European Union. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vigan, M.; Castelain, F. Cosmetovigilance: Definition, regulation, and use “in practice”. Eur. J. Derm. 2014, 24, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. MedEffect Canada. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada.html (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  36. Nohynek, G.J.; Antignac, E.; Re, T.; Toutain, H. Safety assessment of personal care products/ cosmetics and their ingredients. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 243, 239–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sautebin, L. A cosmetovigilance survey in Europe. Pharm. Res. 2007, 55, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Udupa, N.; Ligade, V. Need of Cosmetovigilance in India. Value Health 2016, 19, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Figure 1. Top 10 countries publishing cosmetic-related adverse effect publications by the total number of documents.
Figure 1. Top 10 countries publishing cosmetic-related adverse effect publications by the total number of documents.
Cosmetics 08 00075 g001
Figure 2. Keyword network of cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Figure 2. Keyword network of cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Cosmetics 08 00075 g002
Figure 3. Countries network of literature on the adverse effects of cosmetics.
Figure 3. Countries network of literature on the adverse effects of cosmetics.
Cosmetics 08 00075 g003
Figure 4. Years, with their number of publications.
Figure 4. Years, with their number of publications.
Cosmetics 08 00075 g004
Table 1. Document types in the scientific literature related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Table 1. Document types in the scientific literature related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
SI. NODocument TypeNumber of Publications%
1Article294871.43
2Review80219.43
3Book Chapter1092.64
4Letter912.20
5Conference Paper801.94
6Note451.09
7Short Survey240.58
8Editorial170.41
9Book80.19
10Retracted20.04
11Total4122100%
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Table 2. The first ten research areas of the publications related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Table 2. The first ten research areas of the publications related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
SI. NOResearch AreasNumber of Publications%
1Medicine322178.04
2Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics63615.41
3Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology4109.93
4Environmental Science2215.35
5Chemistry1413.41
6Agricultural and Biological Sciences1243.00
7Chemical Engineering1232.98
8Engineering892.15
9Immunology and Microbiology601.45
10Physics and Astronomy511.23
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Table 3. The first ten authors by record count.
Table 3. The first ten authors by record count.
SI. NOAuthorInstitutionsCountryRecord Count%
1Andersen, F. A.Cosmetic Ingredient Review, Washington, D.C., United StatesUnited States330.79
2Kim, B. J.South Korea’s Chung-Ang UniversitySouth Korea270.65
3Carruthers, J.University of British ColumbiaCanada170.41
4Alam, M.Florida Center for Dermatology, St Augustine, United StatesUnited States160.38
5Carruthers, A.the University of British ColumbiaCanada160.38
6Cohen, J. L.Skin Dermatology and DermSurgery, Greenwood Village, United StatesUniversity of CaliforniaUnited States160.38
7Goldman, M. P.Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, San DiegoUnited States160.38
8Gold, M. H.Gold Skin Care Center, NashvilleUnited States150.36
9Goldberg, D. J.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States Laser and Skin Surgery Center of New YorkUnited States140.33
10Dover, J.S.United States Yale UniversityUnited States130.31
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Table 4. The top ten institutions by number of publications in the literature related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Table 4. The top ten institutions by number of publications in the literature related to cosmetic adverse effects literature.
SI. NOInstitutionsDocument Number%
1Harvard Medical School481.16
2University of British Columbia390.94
3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai390.94
4University of California, Los Angeles390.94
5Cosmetic Ingredient Review350.84
6University of California, San Diego350.84
7University of California, San Francisco330.79
8David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA320.77
9University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine310.75
10Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine300.72
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Table 5. The top ten journals by the number of published documents.
Table 5. The top ten journals by the number of published documents.
SI. NOJournal NameNumber of Publications%
1Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology1724.17
2Dermatologic Surgery1593.85
3Aesthetic Surgery Journal1313.17
4Journal of Cosmetic And Laser Therapy1152.78
5Journal of Drugs In Dermatology832.01
6Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery811.96
7International Journal of Toxicology741.79
8Aesthetic Plastic Surgery631.52
9Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology621.50
10Dermatologic Surgery Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Et Al461.11
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Table 6. The ten most cited publications in cosmetic adverse effects literature.
Table 6. The ten most cited publications in cosmetic adverse effects literature.
SI. NOArticle Author Journal NameTotal Citations Year of Publication
1Bacterial Silver Resistance: Molecular Biology and Uses and Misuses of Silver CompoundsSilver, S.FEMS Microbiology Reviews9352003
2Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Safety of Acrylamide. A ReviewFriedman, M.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry8742003
3Emerging Organic Contaminants in Groundwater: a Review of Sources, Fate and OccurrenceLapworth, D.J., et al.Environmental Pollution8722012
4Silver Nanoparticle Applications and Human HealthAhamed, M., et al.Clinica Chimica Acta8412010
5Safety Assessment of Esters of p-Hydroxybenzoic Acid (Parabens)Soni, M.G., et al.Food and Chemical Toxicology6642005
6Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, and Endocrine Disruptors In Water: Implications for the Water IndustrySnyder, S.A., et al.Environmental Engineering Science6622003
7Application of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) to the Safety Evaluation of Cosmetic IngredientsKroes, R., et al.Food and Chemical Toxicology5862007
8Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals And Disease SusceptibilitySchug, T.T., et al.Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology5802011
9Cyclosporin: A Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Immunoregulatory DisordersFaulds, D., et al.Drugs4661993
10The Relative Risk of Ulcerative Keratitis among Users of Daily-Wear and Extended-Wear Soft Contact LensesSchein, O.D., et al.New England Journal of Medicine 4561989
SI. NO = Serial Number.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nayak, M.; Sreedhar, D.; Prabhu, S.S.; Ligade, V.S. Global Trends in Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Effects: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published during 1957–2021. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030075

AMA Style

Nayak M, Sreedhar D, Prabhu SS, Ligade VS. Global Trends in Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Effects: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published during 1957–2021. Cosmetics. 2021; 8(3):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nayak, Manjula, Dharmagadda Sreedhar, Smitha S. Prabhu, and Virendra S. Ligade. 2021. "Global Trends in Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Effects: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published during 1957–2021" Cosmetics 8, no. 3: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8030075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop