Next Article in Journal
Calculating MIPS 2.0
Next Article in Special Issue
The Nagoya Protocol: Fragmentation or Consolidation?
Previous Article in Journal
Clermont Preferred Future: Stakeholder Reflections on a Community Foresight and Planning Initiative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tree Crops, a Permanent Agriculture: Concepts from the Past for a Sustainable Future
Article

The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case

Centre for Philosophy of Law, Université catholique de Louvain, Collège Thomas More, Place Montesquieu 2, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2013, 2(4), 555-580; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2040555
Received: 15 June 2013 / Revised: 30 September 2013 / Accepted: 8 October 2013 / Published: 23 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Equitable and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources)
The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing is the latest protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Its implementation can lead to two fundamentally different processes: a market-oriented self-regulatory approach, which emphasizes the self-regulating capacity of the economic actors involved, or a normative institutionalist approach, which focuses on the norms and formal rules of institutions that not only support and frame, but also shape and constrain the actions of the players acting within them. This paper analyzes the challenges related to the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in the specific case of Belgium, and evaluates the possibility of moving from a self-regulatory to an institutional approach of implementation, which we argue is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Protocol. This move is analyzed in the specific multi-level governance context characterizing the Nagoya Protocol, which has a natural tendency towards a market-oriented self-regulatory approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: self-regulation; institutionalism; European environmental policy; biodiversity governance; access and benefit-sharing (ABS); Nagoya Protocol; implementation challenges self-regulation; institutionalism; European environmental policy; biodiversity governance; access and benefit-sharing (ABS); Nagoya Protocol; implementation challenges
MDPI and ACS Style

Coolsaet, B.; Dedeurwaerdere, T.; Pitseys, J. The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case. Resources 2013, 2, 555-580. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2040555

AMA Style

Coolsaet B, Dedeurwaerdere T, Pitseys J. The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case. Resources. 2013; 2(4):555-580. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2040555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coolsaet, Brendan, Tom Dedeurwaerdere, and John Pitseys. 2013. "The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case" Resources 2, no. 4: 555-580. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2040555

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop