Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Cultural Importance Across Time (1970–2022) and Possible Scenarios (2050)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Importance of Goat Production in the World
3. Geographical Distribution of Goat Dairy Production
4. Dairy Goat Production: Main Global Trends
5. Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic and Cultural Importance in the World
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations (UN). Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; Available online: https://www.are.admin.ch/dam/are/en/dokumente/nachhaltige_entwicklung/dokumente/bericht/our_common_futurebrundtlandreport1987.pdf.download.pdf/our_common_futurebrundtlandreport1987.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2024).
- United Nations (UN). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations General Assembly: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Available online: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1 (accessed on 26 August 2024).
- United Nations (UN). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs—Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2024).
- Porkka, M.; Kummu, M.; Siebert, S.; Varis, O. From Food Insufficiency Towards Trade Dependency: A Historical Analysis of Global Food Availability. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Global Footprint Network (GFN). Earth Overshoot Day 2024 Approaching. 2024. Available online: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/2024/07/21/earth_overshoot_day_2024/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
- Tscherrig, J. Safeguarding Rights of Future Generations for Long-Term Sustainability. Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Hub—International Institute for Sustainable Development. 2023. Available online: https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/safeguarding-rights-of-future-generations-for-long-term-sustainability/ (accessed on 4 September 2024).
- Kimhi, A. Food Security in Israel: Challenges and Policies. Foods 2024, 13, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ambikapathi, R.; Schneider, K.R.; Davis, B.; Herrero, M.; Winters, P.; Fanzo, J.C. Global Food Systems Transitions Have Enabled Affordable Diets but Had Less Favorable Outcomes for Nutrition, Environmental Health, Inclusion and Equity. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; Wood, A.; DeClerck, F.; et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fanzo, J.; Haddad, L.; Schneider, K.R.; Béné, C.; Covic, N.M.; Guarin, A.; Herforth, A.W.; Herrero, M.; Sumaila, U.R.; Aburto, N.J.; et al. Rigorous Monitoring is Necessary to Guide Food System Transformation in the Countdown to the 2030 Global Goals. Food Policy 2021, 104, 102163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrero, M.; Thornton, P.K.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Palmer, J.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Pradhan, P.; Barrett, C.B.; Benton, T.G.; Hall, A.; Pikaar, I.; et al. Articulating the Effect of Food Systems Innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Planet. Health 2021, 5, e50–e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, Q.; Fanzo, J.; Barrett, C.B.; Jones, A.D.; Herforth, A.; McLaren, R. Building a global Food Systems Typology: A New Tool for Reducing Complexity in Food Systems Analysis. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 746512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, R. (Ed.) Hunger and Malnutrition as Major Challenges of the 21st Century; The World Scientific Series in Grand Public Policy Challenges of the 21st Century; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2018; Volume 3, 452p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, P.; Stordalen, G.A.; Singh, S.; Wijesinha-Bettoni, R.; Shetty, P.; Lartey, A. Hunger and Malnutrition in the 21st Century. BMJ 2018, 361, k2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnton-Hill, I. Public Health Aspects in the Prevention and Control of Vitamin Deficiencies. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, nzz075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, F.; Salam, R.A.; Lassi, Z.S.; Das, J.K. The Intertwined Relationship Between Malnutrition and Poverty. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, M.S.; Uzair, M.; Raza, A.; Habib, M.; Xu, Y.; Yousuf, M.; Yang, S.H.; Ramzan-Khan, M. Uncovering the Research Gaps to Alleviate the Negative Impacts of Climate Change on Food Security: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 927535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Tian, H.; Shi, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Pan, S.; Yang, J. Increased Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity of Major Croplands in China: Implications for Food Security and Climate Change Mitigation. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 6116–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sweileh, W.M. Bibliometric Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Literature on Food Security in the Context of Climate Change From 1980 to 2019. Agric. Food Secur. 2020, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadathur, S.; Wanasundara, J.P.D.; Scanlin, L. Chapter 32 Feeding the Globe Nutritious Food in 2050: Obligations and Ethical Choices. In Sustainable Protein Sources, 2nd ed.; Nadathur, S., Wanasundara, J.P.D., Scanlin, L., Eds.; Academic Press—Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 649–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makutėnas, V.; Arminienė, A.; Kaupys, E. Food Security in the Baltic States. Manag. Theory Stud. Rural. Bus. Infrastruct. Dev. 2024, 46, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muluneh, M.G. Impact of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Food Security: A Global Perspective—A Review Article. Agric. Food Secur. 2021, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawlak, K.; Kołodziejczak, M. The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godde, C.M.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Mayberry, D.E.; Thornton, P.K.; Herrero, M. Impacts of Climate Change on the Livestock Food Supply Chain; A Review of the Evidence. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 28, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Statistics Database. Rome. 2024. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- Alexander, P.; Brown, C.; Dias, C.; Moran, D.; Rounsevell, M.D.A. Chapter 1 Sustainable Proteins Production. In Proteins: Sustainable Source, Processing and Applications; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press—Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scanes, C.G. Chapter 3 Animal Products and Human Nutrition. In Animals and Human Society; Scanes, C.G., Toukhsati, S.R., Eds.; Academic Press—Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, B.P.; Senaratne-Lenagala, L.; Stube, A.; Brackenridge, A. Protein Demand: Review of Plant and Animal Proteins Used in Alternative Protein Product Development and Production. Anim. Front. 2020, 10, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henchion, M.; Moloney, A.P.; Hyland, J.; Zimmermann, J.; McCarthy, S. Trends for Meat, Milk and Egg Consumption for the Next Decades and the Role Played by Livestock Systems in the Global Production of Proteins. Animal 2021, 15, 100287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghori, S.S.; Tehseen, F.; Sana, Q.U. Discernment of Adulterants in Milk Samples from Some Local Dairy Farms of Hyderabad. Int. J. Pharm. Qual. Assur. 2021, 12, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D.; Rai, D.; Porwal, P.; Kumar, S. Compositional Quality of Milk and its Contaminants on Physical and Chemical Concern: A Review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018, 7, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Delger, M.; Dave, A.; Singh, H.; Ye, A. Seasonal Variations in the Composition and Physicochemical Characteristics of Sheep and Goat Milks. Foods 2022, 11, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pulina, G.; Milán, M.J.; Lavín, M.P.; Theodoridis, A.; Morin, E.; Capote, J.; Thomas, D.L.; Francesconi, A.H.D.; Caja, G. Invited Review: Current Production Trends, Farm Structures, and Economics of the Dairy Sheep and Goat Sectors. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6715–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isidro-Requejo, L.M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Pastor-Lopez, F.J.; Maldonado, J.A.; Salinas-González, H. Physicochemical Characterization of Goat Milk Produced in the Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kováčová, M.; Výrostková, J.; Dudriková, E.; Zigo, F.; Semjon, B.; Regecová, I. Assessment of Quality and Safety of Farm Level Produced Cheeses from Sheep and Goat Milk. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nudda, A.; Correddu, F.; Cesarani, A.; Pulina, G.; Battacone, G. Functional Odd- and Branched-Chain Fatty Acid in Sheep and Goat Milk and Cheeses. Dairy 2021, 2, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Navarrete-Molina, C.; Luna-García, L.A.; Pérez-Marín, C.; Altamirano-Cárdenas, J.R.; Macías-Cruz, U.; García-de la Peña, C.; Abad-Zavaleta, J. Small Ruminants and Sustainability in Latin America & the Caribbean: Regionalization, Main Production Systems, and a Combined Productive, Socio-Economic & Ecological Footprint Quantification. Small Rumin. Res. 2022, 211, 106676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarrete-Molina, C.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Herrera-Machuca, M.A.; Macias-Cruz, U.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Not All Ruminants Were Created Equal: Environmental and Socio-Economic Sustainability of Goats Under a Marginal-Extensive Production System. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ornelas-Villarreal, E.C.; Navarrete-Molina, C.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Herrera-Machuca, M.A.; Altamirano-Cardenas, J.R.; Macias-Cruz, U.; García-de la Peña, C.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Goat Production and Sustainability in Latin America & the Caribbean: A Combined Productive, Socio-Economic & Ecological Footprint Approach. Small Rumin. Res. 2022, 211, 106677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazinani, M.; Rude, B. Population, World Production and Quality of Sheep and Goat Products. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 15, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Salinas, F.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Duarte-Vázquez, M.A.; Silva-Jarquín, J.C. Implications of Nutrigenomics in the Feeding of Goats and its Impact in Functional Properties of Goat’s Milk: A Review. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2023, 42, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verruck, S.; Dantas, A.; Prudencio, E.S. Functionality of the Components from Goat’s Milk, Recent Advances for Functional Dairy Products Development and its Implications on Human Health. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saikia, D.; Hassani, M.I.; Walia, A. Goat Milk and its Nutraceutical Properties. Int. J. App. Res. 2022, 8, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos, W.M.; Gomes, A.C.G.; de Caldas Nobre, M.S.; de Souza Pereira, Á.M.; dos Santos Pereira, E.V.; dos Santos, K.M.O.; Florentino, E.R.; Buriti, F.C.A. Goat Milk as a Natural Source of Bioactive Compounds and Strategies to Enhance the Amount of These Beneficial Components. Int. Dairy J. 2023, 137, 105515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manolache, A.M. Analysis of sheep and goat milk production by development regions and forms of property in the period 2010–2018. In Agrarian Economy and Rural Development—Realities and Perspectives for Romania, 1st ed.; International Symposium; The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR): Bucharest, Romania, 2020; pp. 352–356. Available online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234413/1/ICEADR-2020-p352.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2024).
- Marius, L.N.; Shipandeni, M.N.T.; Togarepi, C. Review on the Status of Goat Production, Marketing, Challenges and Opportunities in Namibia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, B.A.; Lu, C.D. Current Status of Global Dairy Goat Production: An Overview. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Morales, F.A.; Castel-Genís, J.M.; Mena-Guerrero, Y. Current Status, Challenges and the Way Forward for Dairy Goat Production in Europe. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, M.K.; Singh, S.K.; Chauhan, M.S. Exploring Potential of Goat Based Dairy Farming in India and way Forward. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 93, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumarmono, J. Current Goat Milk Production, Characteristics, and Utilization in Indonesia. In International Conference on Environmental, Energy and Earth Science—IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2022; Volume 1041, p. 012082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berihulay, H.; Abied, A.; He, X.; Jiang, L.; Ma, Y. Adaptation Mechanisms of Small Ruminants to Environmental Heat Stress. Animals 2019, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godber, O.F.; Chentouf, M.; Wall, R. Sustainable Goat Production: Modelling Optimal Performance in Extensive Systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2020, 60, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joy, A.; Dunshea, F.R.; Leury, B.J.; Clarke, I.J.; DiGiacomo, K.; Chauhan, S.S. Resilience of Small Ruminants to Climate Change and Increased Environmental Temperature: A Review. Animals 2020, 10, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koluman, N.; Silanikove, N. The Advantages of Goats for Future Adaptation to Climate Change: A Conceptual Overview. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 163, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morais, L.J.H.G.; Façanha, D.A.E.; Delgado, B.J.V.; Guilhermino, M.M.; Bermejo, L.A. Adaptive Assessment of Small Ruminants in Arid and Semi-arid Regions. Small Rumin. Res. 2021, 203, 106497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paraskevopoulou, C.; Theodoridis, A.; Johnson, M.; Ragkos, A.; Arguile, L.; Smith, L.; Vlachos, D.; Arsenos, G. Sustainability Assessment of Goat and Sheep Farms: A Comparison Between European Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reshma-Nair, M.R.; Sejian, V.; Silpa, M.V.; Fonsêca, V.F.C.; de Melo Costa, C.C.; Devaraj, C.; Krishnan, G.; Bagath, M.; Nameer, P.O.; Bhatta, R. Goat as the Ideal Climate-Resilient Animal Model in Tropical Environment: Revisiting Advantages Over Other Livestock Species. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2021, 65, 2229–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, A. Chapter 6 Climate-smart Small Ruminant Production. In Impact of Climate Change on Livestock Health and Production; Nayak, G.D., Sardar, K.K., Das, B.C., Das, D.P., Eds.; New India Publishing Agency: New Delhi, India, 2021; pp. 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silanikove, N.; Koluman, N. Impact of Climate Change on the Dairy Industry in Temperate Zones: Predications on the Overall Negative Impact and on the Positive Role of Dairy Goats in Adaptation to Earth Warming. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 123, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wodajo, H.D.; Gemeda, B.A.; Kinati, W.; Mulem, A.A.; van Eerdewijk, A.; Wieland, B. Contribution of Small Ruminants to Food Security for Ethiopian Smallholder Farmers. Small. Rumin. Res. 2020, 184, 106064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejian, V.; Bagath, M.; Krishnan, G.; Rashamol, V.P.; Pragna, P.; Devaraj, C.; Bhatta, R. Genes for Resilience to Heat Stress in Small Ruminants: A Review. Small. Rumin. Res. 2019, 173, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulrahman, S.; Mani, J.R.; Oladimeji, Y.U.; Abdulazeez, R.O.; Ibrahim, L.A. Analysis of Entrepreneural Management and Food Security Strategies of Small Ruminant Women Farmers in Kirikassamma Local Government Area of Jigawa State. J. Anim. Prod. Res. 2017, 29, 419–429. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/yusuf-oladimeji-2/publication/319932858_analysis_of_entrepreneural_management_and_food_security_strategies_of_small_ruminant_women_farmers_in_kirikassamma_local_government_area_of_jigawa_state/links/59c25a29a6fdcc69b92fc316/analysis-of-entrepreneural-management-and-food-security-strategies-of-small-ruminant-women-farmers-in-kirikassamma-local-government-area-of-jigawa-state.pdf (accessed on 11 September 2024).
- Pragna, P.; Sejian, V.; Bagath, M.; Krishnan, G.; Archana, P.R.; Soren, N.M.; Beena, V.; Bhatta, R. Comparative Assessment of Growth Performance of Three Different Indigenous Goat Breeds Exposed to Summer Heat Stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejian, V.; Silpa, M.V.; Lees, A.M.; Krishnan, G.; Devaraj, C.; Bagath, M.; Anisha, J.P.; Reshma-Nair, M.R.; Manimaran, A.; Bhatta, R.; et al. Chapter 12 Opportunities, Challenges, and Ecological Footprint of Sustaining Small Ruminant Production in the Changing Climate Scenario. In Agroecological Footprints Management for Sustainable Food System; Banerjee, A., Swaroop-Meena, R., Kumar-Jhariya, M., Kumar-Yadav, D., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2021; pp. 365–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteiro, A.; Costa, J.M.; Lima, M.J. Chapter 16 Goat System Productions: Advantages and Disadvantages to the Animal, Environment and Farmer. In Goat Science; Kukovics, S., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2018; pp. 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amills, M.; Capote, J.; Tosser-Klopp, G. Goat Domestication and Breeding: A Jigsaw of Historical, Biological and Molecular Data with Missing Pieces. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aldridge, M.E.; Fearon, J.E.; Haynes, B.P.; Miller, H.M.; Sanford, K.Y.; Scott, R.R.; Anglin, W.W.; Blalock, L.S.; Burkes, B.L.; Cohn-White, O.L.; et al. Solutions for Grand Challenges in Goat and Sheep Production. Biotropia 2018, 26, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohini, M.; Malla, B.A.; Mondal, G. Small Ruminant Sector in India: Present Status, Feeding Systems and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. EC Vet. Sci. 2018, 3, 281–289. Available online: https://ecronicon.net/assets/ecve/pdf/ECVE-03-00040.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2024).
- Yildirir, M.; Koncagül, S.; Öner, Y.; Akin, A.O. Analysis for Prioritizing Risk Status and Sustainable Utilization of Cattle, Sheep, and Goat Breeds in Türkiye. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2023, 47, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, P.; Nayak, V.K.; Sinha, R.; Ganaie, B.A. Review on Small Ruminant Conservation Status and Prospects in India. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 2020, 52, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kichamu, N.; Wanjala, G.; Cziszter, L.T.; Strausz, P.; Astuti, P.K.; Bagi, Z.; Kusza, S. Assessing the Population Structure and Genetic Variability of Kenyan Native Goats Under Extensive Production System. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 16342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Ahmed, Z.; Luo, Y.; Qin, M.; Qiong Yang, Q.; Long, Z.; Le, C.; Yi, K. Whole-genome Resequencing Reveals Diversity and Selective Signals in the Wuxue Goat. Anim. Genet. 2024, 55, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennett, C. Key Ingredients of the Mediterranean Diet: The Nutritious Sum of Delicious Parts. Today’s Dietitian 2016, 18, 28–33. Available online: https://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/0516p28.shtml (accessed on 15 September 2024).
- 076 Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). Agricoltura e Zootecnia. 2017. Available online: http://www.istat.it/it/ (accessed on 15 September 2024).
- Hellenic Statistical Authority (HSA). Agriculture, Livestock, Fishery. 2017. Available online: https://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/agr (accessed on 15 September 2024).
- Idamokoro, E.M. The Significance of Goat Milk in Enhancing Nutrition Security: A Scientiometric Evaluation of Research Studies from 1966 to 2020. Agric. Food Secur. 2023, 12, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L. The Importance of Animals in Sacrificial Rituals and Socio-religious Occasions Practised by the Indigenous Communities of Morocco and Strategies to Conserve them from Extinction. Biologia 2024, 79, 753–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, S.; Goswami, A.; Nanda, S.M.; Paul, B. Goat Farming in Sustainable Livelihood Security of Rural Poor People. Trends Clin. Dis. Prod. Manag. Goats 2024, 1, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jandyal, M.; Malav, O.P.; Singh, S. Goat Milk: Nutritional Value, Therapeutic Benefits and Market Trends. Vet Alumnus 2024, 46, 88–93. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ashwani-Kumar-54/publication/382242207_Vet_Alumnus_ISSN_2319_5762_June_2024_461/links/6693b34b3e0edb1e0fe14282/Vet-Alumnus-ISSN-2319-5762-June-2024-461.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2024).
- Yadav, R.K.; Singh, N.; Chandra, V.; Fozdar, A.; Dilawar, M. Importance of Different Species of Milk, Such as Goat, Sheep, Camel, Donkey, Buffalo, and Cattle Milk. Indian Farmer 2024, 11, 56–58. Available online: https://indianfarmer.net/uploads/IndFarmVol11Issue01_16.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2024).
- Thakur, R.; Biswal, P.; Sari, T.P.; Kumar, D.; Sagar, N.A.; Bhardwaj, S.; Pandey, H.O.; Chandratre, G.A.; Tarafdar, A. Therapeutic Effect of Goat Milk and its Value-Addition: Current Status and way Forward. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 61, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sailer, L.M.; Holinger, M.; Burla, J.B.; Wechsler, B.; Zanolari, P.; Friedli, K. Influence of Housing and Management on Claw Health in Swiss Dairy Goats. Animals 2021, 11, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulou, A.; Ragkos, A.; Theodoridis, A.; Skordos, D.; Parissi, Z.; Abraham, E. Evaluation of the Contribution of Pastures on the Economic Sustainability of Small Ruminant Farms in a Typical Greek Area. Agronomy 2020, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias-Silva, T.P.; Abdalla-Filho, A.L. Sheep and Goat Feeding Behavior Profile in Grazing Systems. Acta Sci.-Anim. Sci. 2021, 43, e51265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellado, M. Dietary Selection by Goats and the Implications for Range Management in the Chihuahuan Desert: A Review. Rangel. J. 2016, 38, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyamukanza, C.C.; Sebata, A. Effect of Leaf Type on Browse Selection by Free-Ranging Goats in a Southern African Savanna. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zobel, G.; Nawroth, C. Current State of Knowledge on the Cognitive Capacities of Goats and its Potential to Inform Species-Specific Enrichment. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 192, 106208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chniter, M.; Dhaoui, A.; Ben-Nasr, J. Chapter 21 Economics and Profitability of Goat Breeding in the Maghreb Region. In Goat Science—Environment, Health and Economy Science; Kukovics, S., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2021; 13p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gnanda, B.I.; N’Diaye, A.W.; Sanon, H.O.; Somda, J.; Nianogo, J.A. Rôle et Place de la Chèvre Dans les Ménages du Sahel burkinabé. Tropicultura 2016, 34, 10–25. Available online: http://www.tropicultura.org/text/v34n1/10.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2024).
- Atoui, A.; Najari, S.; Díaz, C.; Abdennebi, M.; Carabaño, M.J. On the Modelling of Weights of Kids to Enhance Growth in a Local Goat Population Under Tunisian Arid Conditions: The Maternal Effects. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 2022, 54, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chniter, M.; Dhaoui, A.; Houidheg, A.; Atigui, M.; Hammadi, M. Socio-economic Aspects and Farming Practices of Goats in Southern Tunisia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kdidi, S.; Yahyaoui, M.H.; Conte, M.; Chiappini, B.; Hammadi, M.; Khorchani, T.; Vaccari, G. Genetic Variation in the Prion Protein Gene (PRNP) of Two Tunisian Goat Populations. Animals 2021, 11, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheyyat, H.E.; Madidi, S.E. Goat Farming in the Arganeraie of Agadir in Morocco: Livestock System and Production Parameters. Asian J. Res. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 5, 20–28. Available online: http://article.publish4promo.com/id/eprint/1314/1/83-Article%20Text-166-2-10-20220921.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2024). [CrossRef]
- Arce, C.; Díaz-Gaona, C.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, M.; Sanz-Fernández, S.; López-Fariña, M.D.; Rodríguez-Estévez, V. The Role of Women on Dairy Goat Farms in Southern Spain. Animals 2022, 12, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assan, N. Goat-A Sustainable and Holistic Approach in Addressing Triple Challenges of Gender Inequality, Climate Change Effects, Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Rural Communities of Sub-Saharan Africa; Intech Open: London, UK, 2021; 446p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kariuki, J.; Galie, A.; Birner, R.; Oyieng, E.; Chagunda, M.G.G.; Jakinda, S.; Milia, D.; Ojango, J.M.K. Does the Gender of Farmers Matter for Improving Small Ruminant Productivity? A Kenyan Case Study. Small Rumin. Res. 2022, 206, 106574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinati, W.; Temple, E.C.; Baker, D.; Najjar, D. Small Ruminant Value Chain and Empowerment: A Gendered Baseline Study from Ethiopia. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1165792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogolla, K.O.; Chemuliti, J.K.; Ngutu, M.; Kimani, W.W.; Anyona, D.N.; Nyamongo, I.K.; Bukachi, S.A. Women’s Empowerment and Intra-Household Gender Dynamics and Practices Around Sheep and Goat Production in South East Kenya. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, H.W.; Favarin, S. The Economic Importance of Dairy Goat Breeding for Rural Development. Rev. Cient. Rural 2020, 22, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakchaure, N.; Sethi, R.S. Chapter 18 Entrepreneurship in Goat Farming. In Trends in Clinical Diseases, Production and Management of Goats; Rana, T., Ed.; Academic Press—Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayasekara, P.P.; Theppangna, W.; Olmo, L.; Xaikhue, T.; Jenkins, C.; Gerber, P.F.; Walkden-Brown, S.W. Disease as a Constraint on Goat Production in Lao PDR and Trade to Neighbouring Countries: A Review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2024, 64, AN23412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subharat, S.; Meunsene, D.; Putthana, V.; Tiwari, H.; Firestone, S.M. Field Epidemiology Capacity of the National Veterinary Services of Lao PDR: An Online Survey. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1096554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Satpute, T.; Sriranga, K.R.; Harini, K.R.; Tomar, D.S.; Singh, B.; Ukey, A. Integrated Goat Farming. Indian J. Livest. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2023, 3, 186–192. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gaurav-Jain-53/publication/376798959_GOAT_PRODUCTION_AND_MANAGEMENT/links/6589139e2468df72d3d1ce8c/GOAT-PRODUCTION-AND-MANAGEMENT.pdf#page=191 (accessed on 30 September 2024).
- Al-Barakeh, F.; Khashroum, A.O.; Tarawneh, R.A.; Al-Lataifeh, F.A.; Al-Yacoub, A.N.; Dayoub, M.; Al-Najjar, K. Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan. Ruminants 2024, 4, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domagała, J.; Najgebauer-Lejko, D.; Walczycka, M. Chapter 12 Traditional Unfermented and Fermented Liquid Milk Products from the Malopolska Region. In Cultural Heritage—Possibilities for Land—Centered Societal Development—Environmental History; Hernik, J., Walczycka, M., Sankowski, E., Harris, B.J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 13, pp. 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, A.; Goldman, M.J. Beyond Payments for Ecosystem Services: Considerations of Trust, Livelihoods and Tenure Security in Community-Based Conservation Projects. Oryx 2017, 53, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsoner, T.; Vigl, L.E.; Manck, F.; Jaritz, G.; Tappeiner, U.; Tasser, E. Indigenous Livestock Breeds as Indicators for Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Spatial Analysis Within the Alpine Space. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ovaska, U.; Bläuer, A.; Kroløkke, C.; Kjetså, M.; Kantanen, J.; Honkatukia, M. The Conservation of Native Domestic Animal Breeds in Nordic Countries: From Genetic Resources to Cultural Heritage and Good Governance. Animals 2021, 11, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Area | Population (Mh) | % | Yield (kg h−1 y−1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Goat | Dairy Goat | |||
World | 1145.386 | 214.013 | 18.68 | 89.70 |
Europe | 14.836 | 10.712 | 72.20 | 285.40 |
Asia | 581.189 | 105.507 | 18.15 | 102.80 |
America | 38.791 | 9.108 | 23.48 | 90.90 |
Africa | 506.160 | 88.685 | 17.52 | 50.30 |
Oceania | 4.411 | 0.001 | 0.03 | 29.40 |
Area/Year | 1970 | 2020 | 2050 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
World | 76.01 | 100% 2 | 213.89 | 100% | 328.22 | 100% |
Asia | 36.89 | 48.53% | 105.26 | 49.21% | 154.37 | 47.03% |
India | 6.50 | 8.55% | 36.32 | 16.98% | 40.31 | 12.28% |
Bangladesh | 4.35 | 5.72% | 18.80 | 8.79% | 54.72 | 16.67% |
Indonesia | 2.60 | 3.42% | 7.32 | 3.42% | 10.63 | 3.24% |
Mongolia | 0.55 | 0.72% | 6.48 | 3.03% | 18.63 | 5.68% |
Pakistan | 1.94 | 2.55% | 6.80 | 3.18% | 13.34 | 4.06% |
Africa | 25.40 | 33.42% | 88.63 | 41.44% | 158.04 | 48.15% |
Mali | 2.20 | 2.89% | 20.86 | 9.75% | 48.82 | 14.88% |
Sudan | 1.71 | 2.26% | 18.21 | 8.51% | 27.39 | 8.35% |
South Sudan | 0.69 | 0.90% | 8.49 | 3.97% | 11.30 | 3.44% |
Niger | 3.10 | 4.08% | 6.59 | 3.08% | 15.83 | 4.82% |
Somalia | 7.84 | 10.31% | 6.14 | 2.87% | 7.70 | 2.35% |
Europe | 8.63 | 11.35% | 11.07 | 5.18% | 12.38 | 3.77% |
Greece | 3.09 | 4.06% | 2.33 | 1.09% | 3.00 | 0.91% |
Spain | MV 3 | MV | 1.89 | 0.88% | 5.02 | 1.53% |
Romania | MV | MV | 1.29 | 0.60% | 1.03 | 0.31% |
France | 0.76 | 1.00% | 1.18 | 0.55% | 1.50 | 0.46% |
Italy | 0.80 | 1.05% | 0.83 | 0.39% | 1.25 | 0.38% |
America | 5.09 | 6.70% | 8.93 | 4.18% | 10.87 | 3.31% |
Brazil | 2.29 | 3.01% | 5.67 | 2.65% | 6.87 | 2.09% |
Mexico | 1.25 | 1.64% | 0.77 | 0.36% | 1.47 | 0.45% |
Haiti | 0.53 | 0.70% | 0.62 | 0.29% | 1.16 | 0.35% |
Jamaica | MV | MV | 0.54 | 0.25% | 1.03 | 0.31% |
Bolivia | 0.35 | 0.46% | 0.47 | 0.22% | 0.88 | 0.27% |
Area/Year | 1970 | 2020 | 2050 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
World | 6.48 | 100% 2 | 19.18 | 100% | 32.87 | 100% |
Asia | 2.57 | 39.67% | 10.69 | 55.73% | 19.75 | 60.06% |
India | 0.62 | 9.63% | 6.26 | 32.65% | 12.64 | 38.45% |
Pakistan | 0.18 | 2.72% | 0.97 | 5.03% | 1.43 | 4.35% |
Bangladesh | 0.35 | 5.36% | 0.75 | 3.90% | 1.23 | 3.73% |
Turkey | 0.48 | 7.43% | 0.59 | 3.07% | 0.86 | 2.61% |
Indonesia | 0.10 | 1.60% | 0.36 | 1.88% | 0.47 | 1.44% |
Africa | 1.52 | 23.49% | 4.53 | 23.63% | 7.77 | 23.63% |
Sudan | 0.21 3 | 3.20% | 1.17 | 6.08% | 1.90 | 5.77% |
South Sudan | 0.09 3 | 1.37% | 0.54 | 2.83% | 0.84 | 2.56% |
Somalia | 0.44 | 6.79% | 0.37 | 1.93% | 0.41 | 1.23% |
Niger | 0.16 | 2.39% | 0.41 | 2.12% | 0.97 | 2.95% |
Algeria | 0.12 | 1.87% | 0.33 | 1.74% | 0.78 | 2.38% |
Europe | 2.06 | 31.77% | 3.15 | 16.41% | 4.30 | 13.08% |
France | 0.28 | 4.30% | 0.71 | 3.70% | 1.03 | 3.12% |
Spain | 0.31 | 4.85% | 0.52 | 2.73% | 0.68 | 2.05% |
Netherlands | MV 4 | MV | 0.41 | 2.12% | 1.54 | 4.69% |
Greece | 0.35 | 5.36% | 0.36 | 1.88% | 0.46 | 1.41% |
Russia | MV | MV | 0.25 | 1.33% | 0.22 | 0.66% |
America | 0.33 | 5.07% | 0.81 | 4.23% | 1.06 | 3.22% |
Brazil | 0.07 | 1.06% | 0.29 | 1.52% | 0.38 | 1.15% |
Jamaica | MV | MV | 0.19 | 1.00% | 0.26 | 0.78% |
Mexico | 0.19 | 2.99% | 0.17 | 0.88% | 0.26 | 0.78% |
Haiti | 0.02 | 0.33% | 0.05 | 0.26% | 0.06 | 0.20% |
Bolivia | 0.01 | 0.17% | 0.03 | 0.15% | 0.04 | 0.14% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Navarrete-Molina, C.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; De Santiago-Miramontes, A.; Valenzuela-Núñez, L.M.; Marin-Tinoco, R.I.; Soto-Cardenas, M.A.; Sariñana-Navarrete, M.A. Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Cultural Importance Across Time (1970–2022) and Possible Scenarios (2050). Resources 2024, 13, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13120177
Navarrete-Molina C, Meza-Herrera CA, De Santiago-Miramontes A, Valenzuela-Núñez LM, Marin-Tinoco RI, Soto-Cardenas MA, Sariñana-Navarrete MA. Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Cultural Importance Across Time (1970–2022) and Possible Scenarios (2050). Resources. 2024; 13(12):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13120177
Chicago/Turabian StyleNavarrete-Molina, Cayetano, Cesar A. Meza-Herrera, Angeles De Santiago-Miramontes, Luis M. Valenzuela-Núñez, Ruben I. Marin-Tinoco, Miguel A. Soto-Cardenas, and Maria A. Sariñana-Navarrete. 2024. "Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Cultural Importance Across Time (1970–2022) and Possible Scenarios (2050)" Resources 13, no. 12: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13120177
APA StyleNavarrete-Molina, C., Meza-Herrera, C. A., De Santiago-Miramontes, A., Valenzuela-Núñez, L. M., Marin-Tinoco, R. I., Soto-Cardenas, M. A., & Sariñana-Navarrete, M. A. (2024). Dairy Goat Production: Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Cultural Importance Across Time (1970–2022) and Possible Scenarios (2050). Resources, 13(12), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13120177